91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (133) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Sicherheit (58)
- Safety (57)
- Bewertung (40)
- Evaluation (assessment) (40)
- Vehicle (39)
- Fahrzeug (38)
- Anfahrversuch (34)
- Impact test (veh) (31)
- Conference (28)
- Test method (28)
- Versuch (27)
- Konferenz (26)
- Prüfverfahren (26)
- Test (26)
- Accident (22)
- Unfall (22)
- Fußgänger (20)
- Pedestrian (20)
- Anthropometric dummy (19)
- Deutschland (19)
- Germany (19)
- Car (18)
- Dummy (17)
- Collision (16)
- Pkw (16)
- Compatibility (15)
- Kompatibilität (15)
- Simulation (15)
- Driver assistance system (14)
- Method (14)
- Passive safety system (14)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (14)
- Verfahren (14)
- Zusammenstoß (14)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (13)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (13)
- Head on collision (13)
- Gesetzgebung (12)
- Legislation (12)
- Research project (12)
- Unfallverhütung (12)
- Accident prevention (11)
- Child (11)
- Forschungsarbeit (11)
- Kind (11)
- Analyse (math) (10)
- Analysis (math) (10)
- EU (10)
- Europa (10)
- Europe (10)
- Injury (10)
- Schlag (10)
- Shock (10)
- Verletzung (10)
- Autonomes Fahren (9)
- Autonomous driving (9)
- Driver (9)
- Driver information (9)
- Fahrer (9)
- Fahrerinformation (9)
- Fahrstabilität (9)
- Insasse (9)
- Lkw (9)
- Lorry (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (9)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (9)
- Vehicle handling (9)
- Vehicle occupant (9)
- Vehicle regulations (9)
- Active safety system (8)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (8)
- Automatic (8)
- Automatisch (8)
- Biomechanics (8)
- Biomechanik (8)
- Electronic driving aid (8)
- Elektronische Fahrhilfe (8)
- Improvement (8)
- Measurement (8)
- Messung (8)
- Motorcycle (8)
- Motorrad (8)
- Severity (accid (8)
- Severity (accid, injury) (8)
- Technologie (8)
- Technology (8)
- Verbesserung (8)
- injury) (8)
- Cyclist (7)
- Fahrzeugführung (7)
- Head (7)
- Kopf (7)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (7)
- Side impact (7)
- Standardisierung (7)
- Belastung (6)
- Bemessung (6)
- Braking (6)
- Bremsung (6)
- Design (overall design) (6)
- Driving (veh) (6)
- Impact test (6)
- Load (6)
- Prevention (6)
- Risiko (6)
- Safety belt (6)
- Sicherheitsgurt (6)
- Verletzung) (6)
- Alte Leute (5)
- Anti locking device (5)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (5)
- Ausrüstung (5)
- Benutzung (5)
- Communication (5)
- Deformation (5)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (5)
- Development (5)
- Entwicklung (5)
- Equipment (5)
- Ergonomics (5)
- Geschwindigkeit (5)
- Headlamp (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Kommunikation (5)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (5)
- Official approval (5)
- Reifen (5)
- Richtlinien (5)
- Risk (5)
- Scheinwerfer (5)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (5)
- Specifications (5)
- Speed (5)
- Standardization (5)
- Steering (process) (5)
- Tyre (5)
- Use (5)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (5)
- Accident rate (4)
- Aufprallschlitten (4)
- Bein (menschl) (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Collision avoidance system (4)
- Cost benefit analysis (4)
- Datenbank (4)
- Decrease (4)
- Driver training (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Ergonomie (4)
- Fahrausbildung (4)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (4)
- Fahrzeugsitz (4)
- Impact sled (4)
- Interior (veh) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Nacht (4)
- Night (4)
- Norm (tech) (4)
- Old people (4)
- Perception (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Road user (4)
- Seat (veh) (4)
- Sichtbarkeit (4)
- Specification (standard) (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (4)
- Verformung (4)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (4)
- Verminderung (4)
- Sichtbarkeit (4)
- Wahrnehmung (4)
- Airbag (3)
- Antikollisionssystem (3)
- Auffahrunfall (3)
- Bend (road) (3)
- Bicycle (3)
- Brake (3)
- Bremse (3)
- Bus (3)
- Database (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Error (3)
- Fahrleistung (3)
- Fahrrad (3)
- Fehler (3)
- Gewicht (3)
- Human body (3)
- Knie (menschl) (3)
- Kraftfahrzeug (3)
- Leuchtdichte (3)
- Luminance (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Messgerät (3)
- Modification (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Policy (3)
- Politik (3)
- Rear end collision (3)
- Reflectivity (3)
- Reflexionsgrad (3)
- Spikesreifen (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Statistik (3)
- Straßenkurve (3)
- Straßenverkehr (3)
- Studded tyre (3)
- Unterfahrschutz (3)
- Vehicle mile (3)
- Verhütung (3)
- Warning (3)
- Weight (3)
- Windschutzscheibe (3)
- Windscreen (veh) (3)
- Active safety (2)
- Adolescent (2)
- Age (2)
- Air bag (restraint system) (2)
- Aktive Sicherheit (2)
- Alter (2)
- Ankündigung (2)
- Apparatus (measuring) (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Baumusterzulassung (2)
- Bicyclist (2)
- Blendung (2)
- Body (car) (2)
- Braking distance (2)
- Bremsweg (2)
- Cause (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Data acquisition (2)
- Datenerfassung (2)
- Delivery vehicle (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Electric vehicle (2)
- Elektrofahrzeug (2)
- Empfindlichkeit (2)
- Fahranfänger (2)
- Fatality (2)
- Federung (2)
- Forschungsbericht (2)
- France (2)
- Frankreich (2)
- Glare (2)
- Griffigkeit (2)
- Highway traffic (2)
- Impact study (2)
- Individueller Verkehr (2)
- Industrie (2)
- Industry (2)
- International (2)
- Jugendlicher (2)
- Karosserie (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Kunststoff (2)
- Landstraße (2)
- Mathematical model (2)
- Nummer (2)
- Plastic material (2)
- Private transport (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Prüfstand (2)
- Rear view mirror (2)
- Recently qualified driver (2)
- Rechenmodell (2)
- Reconstruction (accid) (2)
- Reflectorized material (2)
- Reflexstoffe (2)
- Road network (2)
- Rural road (2)
- Rückspiegel (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Sensitivity (2)
- Sensor (2)
- Skidding resistance (2)
- Straßennetz (2)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (2)
- Suspension (veh) (2)
- Test rig (2)
- Traffic count (2)
- Transport (2)
- Tödlicher Unfall (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vehicle inspection (2)
- Verkehrserhebung (2)
- Versuchspuppe (2)
- Veränderung (2)
- Visual display (2)
- Zahl (2)
- Zulassung (tech) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- Abdomen (1)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (1)
- Acceleration (1)
- Accident data (1)
- Accident proneness (1)
- Accompanied driving (1)
- Adaptive cruise control (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anhänger (1)
- Anti blocking device (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Attention (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Axle (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Baustoff (1)
- Begleitetes Fahren (1)
- Begrenzungsleuchten (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Benefit cost analysis (1)
- Berechnung (1)
- Beschleunigung (1)
- Betriebsverhalten (1)
- Bibliographie (1)
- Bibliography (1)
- Bildschirm (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Bonnet (car) (1)
- Brake light (1)
- Bremslicht (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Bumper (1)
- Calculation (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Carriageway (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Coefficient of friction (1)
- Colour (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Components of the car (1)
- Compression (1)
- Construction (1)
- Contact (tyre road) (1)
- Control (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crash helmet (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Cycle car (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Data security (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Daytime running light (1)
- Deceleration (1)
- Decke (Straße) (1)
- Deckschicht (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Demand (econ) (1)
- Demographie (1)
- Deutschland ; Konferenz (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Dimension (1)
- Disabled person (1)
- Distribution (gen) (1)
- Driver experience (1)
- Driving aptitude (1)
- Durability (1)
- Durchsichtigkeit (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emission (1)
- Emission control (1)
- Emissionskontrolle (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Environment (1)
- Environment protection (1)
- Erfahrung (menschl) (1)
- Erste Hilfe (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Experience (human) (1)
- Experimental road (1)
- Expert system (1)
- Expertensystem (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahn (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrbare Barriere (1)
- Fahrstreifen (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrtauglichkeit (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugabstand (1)
- Fahrzeugachse (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Fahrzeugteile (1)
- Failure (1)
- Farbe (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- First aid (1)
- Force (1)
- Form (1)
- Four wheel drive (1)
- Fracht (1)
- Frau (1)
- Freight (1)
- Front (1)
- Fuel consumption (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Gebiet (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Gestaltung (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Gussasphalt (1)
- Haftung (jur) (1)
- Halogen (1)
- Halogene (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Hazard (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Hell (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- In service behaviour (1)
- In situ (1)
- Intelligent transport system (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Interview (1)
- Italien (1)
- Italy (1)
- Itinerary (1)
- Japan (1)
- Kamera (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Kleinwagen (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kraft (1)
- Kraftstoffverbrauch (1)
- Körperstellung (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Layout (1)
- Liability (1)
- Lichtstärke (1)
- Lieferfahrzeug (1)
- Light (colour) (1)
- Light intensity (1)
- Limit (1)
- Location (1)
- Lochstreifen (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Material (constr) (1)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Mobile barrier (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Mobilität (1)
- Motorhaube (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nachfrage (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Naturalistic Driving (1)
- Naturalistic driving (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Oberfläche (1)
- On the spot accident investigation (1)
- Optimum (1)
- Optische Anzeige (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Overturning (veh) (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Population (1)
- Posture (1)
- Properties (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public relations (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Punched tape (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radial (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Rear (1)
- Region (1)
- Reibungsbeiwert (1)
- Reiseweg (1)
- Research report (1)
- Retread tyre (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road (1)
- Road traffic (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rolling resistance (1)
- Rollwiderstand (1)
- Runderneuerter Reifen (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Saftey (1)
- Sample (stat) (1)
- Schall (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schutzhelm (1)
- Schweregrad (unfall (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Schwingung (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Side (1)
- Side light (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Sound (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Stability (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- Standfestigkeit (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steuerung (1)
- Stichprobe (1)
- Stoßstange (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Surface (1)
- Surfacing (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Tagesfahrlicht (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (1)
- Technische Überwachung (1)
- Technische Überwachung (Fahrzeug) (1)
- Teenage driver (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Temperatur (1)
- Temperature (1)
- Tests (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic lanes (1)
- Traffic motivation (1)
- Traffic regulation (1)
- Traffic regulations (1)
- Traffic sign (1)
- Traffic survey (1)
- Trailer (1)
- Train (1)
- Transparent (1)
- Transport infrastructure (1)
- Trend (stat) (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- USA (1)
- Umwelt (1)
- Umweltschutz (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfalldaten (1)
- Unfallneigung (1)
- Unfallverhuetung (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Unterleib (1)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle Regulations (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle spacing (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (1)
- Verkehrsmotivation (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Verkehrsuntersuchung (1)
- Verkehrszeichen (1)
- Versuchsstrecke (1)
- Verteilung (allg) (1)
- Verzögerung (1)
- Vibration (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Vierradantrieb (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Warnung (1)
- Wearing course (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- verletzung) (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
- Überschlagen (1)
Safety of light goods vehicles - findings from the German joint project of BASt, DEKRA, UDV and VDA
(2011)
Light goods vehicles (LGVs) are an important part of the vehicle fleet, providing a vital component in the European transportation system. On the other hand, LGVs are in the focus of public discussion regarding road safety. In order to analyse the accident situation of LGVs in an objective manner, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt), VDA, DEKRA and German Insurers Accident Research (UDV) launched a joint project. The aim of this project, which will be finished by mid of 2011, is to identify reasonable measures which will further improve the safety of LGVs. For the first time, these partners jointly together conducted a research project and put together their know-how in accident research. Analyses are based on real-life accident data from the GIDAS database, the Accident Database of UDV (UDB), the DEKRA database and national statistics. The findings deliver answers to questions within the arena of future legislative actions and consumer protection activities. The analyses of databases cover areas of primary and secondary safety of LGVs with a special focus on advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), driver behaviour as well as partner and occupant protection. Key figures from national statistics are used to highlight hotspots of accidents of LGVs in Germany. Finally, the proposed countermeasures are assessed regarding their potential effectiveness. Amongst others, the results show that the accident situation of LGVs is very similar to that of passenger cars. Noteworthy variations could be found in collisions with pedestrians, at reversing and regarding accident causes. Occupant safety of LGVs is on a higher level compared to cars. Results indicate that seatbelt use is on a significantly lower level compared to cars. This leads to higher-than-average injury risk for unbelted LGV occupants. When it comes to partner protection, there are problems with compatibility at LGVs. For car occupants there is a very high injury risk when colliding with a LGV. It indicates that higher passive safety test standards for LGVs would be counterproductive if they further increase stiffness of LGVs. The analysis of LGV-pedestrian accidents shows that pedestrian kinematic differs significantly from car-pedestrian accidents. At this point, existing pedestrian related test standards developed for cars cannot be adopted to LGVs. When it comes to active safety, ESC proved its effectiveness once again. Beyond that, rear view cameras, advanced emergency braking systems and lane departure warning systems show a safety potential, too. In addition to any technical countermeasures previously discussed, the importance of the driver behavior and attitude regarding the accident risk was investigated. In order to develop successful actions it is important to understand the main target population. In the case of LGV especially the crafts business and smaller companies are the major contributors the safety issue.
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection based on developments by the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) have been introduced in world-wide regulations and consumer test programmes, with considerable harmonization between these programmes. Nevertheless, latest accident investigations reveal a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads running the risk of not meeting the European Union- goal of halving the number of road fatalities by the year 2020. The branch of external road user safety within the EC-funded research project SENIORS under the HORIZON 2020 framework programme focuses on investigating the benefit of modifications to pedestrian test and assessment procedures and their impactors for vulnerable road users with focus on the elderly. Injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists derived from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) show a trend of AIS 2+ and AIS 3+ injuries getting more relevant for the thorax region in crashes with newer cars (Wisch et al., 2017), while maintaining the relevance for head and lower extremities. Several crash databases from Europe such as GIDAS and the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition (STRADA) also show that head, thorax and lower extremities are the key affected body regions not only for the average population but in particular for the elderly. Therefore, the SENIORS project is focusing on an improvement of currently available impactors and procedures in terms of biofidelity and injury assessment ability towards a better protection of the affected body regions, incorporating previous results from FP 6 project APROSYS and subsequent studies carried out by BASt. The paper describes the overall methodology to develop revised FE impactor models. Matched human body model and impactor simulations against generic test rigs provide transfer functions that will be used for the derivation of impactor criteria from human injury risk functions for the affected body regions. In a later step, the refined impactors will be validated by simulations against actual vehicle front-ends. Prototyping and adaptation of test and assessment procedures as well as an impact assessment will conclude the work of the project at the final stage. The work will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users focusing on the elderly. The use of advanced human body models to develop applicable assessment criteria for the revised impactors is intended to cope with the paucity of actual biomechanical data focusing on elderly pedestrians. In order to achieve optimized results in the future, the improved test methods need to be implemented within an integrated approach, combining active with passive safety measures. In order to address the developments in road accidents and injury patterns of vulnerable road users, established test and assessment procedures need to be continuously verified and, where needed, to be revised. The demographic change as well as changes in the vehicle fleet, leading to a variation of accident scenarios, injury frequencies and injury patterns of vulnerable road users are addressed by the work provided by the SENIORS project, introducing updated impactors for pedestrian test and assessment procedures.
The GRSP informal group on child restraint systems (CRS) finalised phase 1 of a new regulation for the homologation of CRS . This regulation is the subject of several discussions concerning the safety benefits and the advantages and disadvantages that certain specific points may bring. However, these discussions are sometimes not based on scientific facts and do not consider the whole package but only single items. Based on the experience of the CASPER partners in the fields of human behaviour, accident analysis, test procedures and biomechanics in the area of child safety, a consideration of the safety benefits of phase 1 of the new regulation and recommendations for phase 2 will be given.
A reduction of around 48% of all road fatalities was achieved in Europe in the past years including a reduced number of fatalities with an older age. However, among all road fatalities, the proportion of elderly is steadily increasing. In an ageing society, the European (Horizon2020) project SENIORS aims to improve the safe mobility of older road users, who have different transportation habits compared to other age groups. To increase their level of safe mobility by determining appropriate requirements for vehicle safety systems, the characteristics of current road traffic collisions involving the elderly and the injuries that they sustain need to be understood in detail. Hereby, the paper focuses on their traffic participation as pedestrian, cyclist or passenger car occupant. Following a literature review, several national and international crash databases and hospital statistics have been analysed to determine the body regions most frequently and severely injured, specific injuries sustained and types of crashes involved, always comparing older road users (65 years and more) with mid-aged road users (25-64 years). The most important crash scenarios were highlighted. The data sources included European statistics from CARE, data on national level from Germany, Sweden, Italy, United Kingdom and Spain as well as in-depth crash information from GIDAS (Germany), RAIDS (UK), CIREN and NASS-CDS (US). In addition, familiar hospital data from Germany (TraumaRegister DGU-®), Italy (Italian Register of Acute Traumas) and UK hospital statistics (TARN) were included in the study to gain further insight into specific injury patterns. Comprehensive data analyses were performed showing injury patterns of older road users in crashes. When comparing with mid-aged road users, all databases showed that the thorax body region is of particularly high importance for the older car occupant with injury severities of AIS 2 or AIS 3+, whereas the body regions lower extremities, head and thorax need to be considered for the older pedestrians and cyclists. Besides these comparisons, the most frequent and severe top 5 injuries were highlighted per road user group. Further, the most important crash configurations were identified and injury risk functions are provided per age group and road user group. Although several databases have been analysed, the picture on the road safety situation of older road users in Europe was not complete, as only Western European data was available. The linkage between crash data and hospital data could only be made on a general level as their inclusion criteria were quite different.
Supported by field accident data and monitoring results of European Regulation (EC) No. 78/2009, recent plans of the European Commission regarding a way forward to improve passive safety of vulnerable road users include, amongst other things, an extension of the head test area. The inclusion of passive cyclist safety is also being considered by Euro NCAP. Although passenger car to cyclist collisions are often severe and have a significant share within the accident statistics, cyclists are neither considered sufficiently in the legislative nor in the consumer ratings tests. Therefore, a test procedure to assess the protection potential of vehicle fronts in a collision with cyclists has been developed within a current research project. For this purpose, the existing pedestrian head impact test procedures were modified in order to include boundary conditions relevant for cyclists as the second big group of vulnerable road users. Based on an in-depth analysis of passenger car to cyclist accidents in Germany the three most representative accident constellations have been initially defined. The development of the test procedure itself was based on corresponding simulations with representative vehicle and bicycle models. In addition to different cyclist heights, reaching from a 6-year-old child to a 95%-male, also four pedal positions were considered. By reconstruction of a real accident the defined simulation parameters could be validated in advance. The conducted accident kinematics analysis shows for a large portion of the constellations an increased head impact area, which can reach beyond the roof leading edge, as well as high average values for head impact velocity and angle. Based on the simulation data obtained for the different vehicle models, cyclist-specific test parameters for impactor tests have been derived, which have been further examined in the course of head and leg impact tests. In order to study the cyclist accident kinematics under real test conditions, different full scale tests with a Polar-II dummy positioned on a bicycle have been conducted. Overall, the tests showed a good correlation with the simulations and support the defined boundary test conditions. Typical accident scenarios and simulations reveal higher head impact locations, angles and velocities. An extended head impact area with modified test parameters will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users including cyclists. However, due to significantly differing impact kinematics and postures between the lower extremities of pedestrians and cyclists, these injuries cannot be addressed by the means of current test tools such as the flexible pedestrian legform impactor FlexPLI. Based on the findings obtained within the project as well as the existing pedestrian protection requirements a cyclist protection test procedure for use in legislation and consumer test programmes has been developed, whose requirements have been transferred into a corresponding test specification. This specification provides common head test boundary conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, whereby the existing requirements are modified and two parallel test procedures are avoided.
Das Ziel des Forschungsprojekts "Quantifizierung der Passiven Sicherheit für Pkw-Insassen" besteht darin, Messergebnisse in Form von Dummybelastungswerten zu einem Sicherheitsindex zu verdichten. Zur Formulierung des dazu erforderlichen Bewertungsalgorithmus wurden folgende Zusammenhänge erarbeitet: 1. Beziehung zwischen Verletzungsschwere und Dummybelastungsgröße für relevante Körperteile, 2. Relevanzfaktoren zur Wichtung der Teilergebnisse und 3. Zusammenhang zwischen körperteilspezifischen Schutzkriterien und dem entsprechenden Erfüllungsgrad. Die wesentliche Aufmerksamkeit erforderte die Bereitstellung der Relevanzstruktur, da mit den einzelnen Relevanzfaktoren die gemessenen Belastungen entsprechend der Bedeutung der im realen Unfallgeschehen beobachteten Verletzungen bewertet werden sollten. Im Bereich der experimentellen Simulation lag das Hauptaugenmerk auf der Bereitstellung der Versuchsbedingungen, wobei die gesetzlich vorgeschriebenen Sicherheitsversuche zu berücksichtigen waren. Daraus ergab sich die Festlegung auf folgende Versuchskonstellationen: 1. Frontaler Wandaufprall, 2. Seitenaufprall einer fahrbaren Barriere auf den stehenden Pkw und 3. Kompatibilitätsversuch, bei dem ein Fahrzeug seitlich mit einem anderen Fahrzeug gleichen Typs kollidiert. Mit Hilfe eines erarbeiteten Bewertungsalgorithmus werden die versuchstechnisch gemessenen Belastungswerte normiert und der Bewertungsfunktion zugeführt. Die so ermittelten Erfüllungsgrade erhalten durch die Relevanzfaktoren eine unfallspezifische Wichtung und lassen sich über Teilsicherheitsindizes zu einem Gesamt-Sicherheitsindex zusammenfassen. Dieser Sicherheitsindex soll Aufschluss über das Niveau der inneren Sicherheit von Pkw geben.
Seit Anfang der 70er Jahre kann im Bereich der passiven Sicherheit eine stetige Verbesserung durch die Abnahme der im Verkehr verletzten und getöteten Personen beobachtet werden. Weitere fahrzeugtechnische Optimierungen zur Verbesserung von Selbst- und Partnerschutz, unterstützt und forciert durch flankierende legislative Maßnahmen, sind durchzuführen, wobei parallel die Effizienz bereits getroffener Maßnahmen zu prüfen ist. In der Pilotstudie wird der Versuch gemacht, ausgehend von bekannten Erkenntnissen der Unfallanalyse, das Gesamtunfallgeschehen Pkw zu realitätsbezogenen, in ihren Wirkungsmechanismen gleichartigen Unfallkonstellationen zusammenzufassen. Die Reduzierung auf wenige Kollisionstypen schafft die Möglichkeit zur Erarbeitung von Testbedingungen. Die im Test nachzufahrenden Unfallkonstellationen und die statisch/dynamische Untersuchung einzelner Fahrzeugkomponenten dokumentieren sich in physikalischen Messwerten und fahrzeugbezogenen Größen. Ein Bewertungssystem addiert die Messwerte auf und versieht sie mit relevanzproportionalen Wichtungsfaktoren zu einem Sicherheitsgrad. Praktische Bedeutung hat das Projekt zum Beispiel für die quantitative Ermittlung des Sicherheitsfortschrittes innerhalb eines Zeitraumes von 10 bis 15 Jahren, der Untersuchung von Sicherheitskomponenten und der Effizienzüberprüfung legislativer Sicherheitsverordnungen etc.
Für eine Reihe von EU Regelungen im Bereich Fahrzeugsicherheit erlaubt eine Verordnung bereits seit dem Jahr 2010 virtuelles Testen für die Typzulassungsprüfung. Technische Details bzw. konkrete Prozeduren für spezifische Regelungen sind in dieser Verordnung jedoch nicht enthalten. Das Hauptziel des europäischen Projekts IMVITER (lmplementation of Virtual Testing in Safety Regulations) war es, basierend auf der neuen Verordnung ein virtuelles Testverfahren auszuarbeiten und dabei offene Fragen zu berücksichtigen. Um die im Projekt-Konsortium unter Berücksichtigung der Anliegen aller Interessensgruppen wie Autohersteller, Zulassungsbehörden und technischer Dienste erarbeiteten offenen Punkte zu adressieren, wurde ein generisches Flussdiagramm entwickelt, das den Ablauf einer virtuell basierten Typprüfung darstellt. ln diesem Diagramm ist der virtuelle Typgenehmigungsprozess in drei aufeinander folgende Phasen aufgeteilt, die Verifikations-, Validierungs- und Typgenehmigungsphase. Von entscheidender Bedeutung ist die Phase der Validierung des Simulationsmodells, für die im IMVITER-Projekt eine Methodik vorgeschlagen wurde. Mit der im Projekt vorgeschlagenen Validierungsmethode ist kein Austausch des Simulationsmodells zwischen Fahrzeughersteller und technischem Dienst notwendig, so dass die Vertraulichkeit von Betriebsgeheimnissen nicht gefährdet ist. Zur Validierung des Modells werden jedoch immer Versuche notwendig sein. Dies gilt sowohl für die Überpruefung von passiven als auch aktiven Fahrzeugsicherheitssystemen. Eine zusammenfassende Betrachtung der Erfahrungen aus dem IMVITER-Projekt ergab, dass mit der Einführung von virtuellem Testen keine Erhöhung der Anforderungen an die Fahrzeugsicherheit bzgl. bestehender Regelungen verbunden sein sollte. Jedoch werden auch weiterhin neue zusäztliche Regelungen erforderlich sein, da sich das Unfallgeschehen und die Fahrzeugtechnologie weiterentwickeln und ändern werden. Diese sollten von Beginn an die Möglichkeiten des virtuellen Testens nutzen, insbesondere bei Testverfahren für neue Technologien, z.B. aktiver Fahrzeugsicherheitssysteme. Hier bieten virtuelle Testverfahren nicht nur eine Kosten- oder Zeitersparnis, sondern ermöglichen teilweise erst die sinnvolle Abprüfung von neuen Sicherheitssystemen, die mit aktuellen auf Hardware-Test basierenden Verfahren überhaupt nicht möglich wären.
According to the German road traffic regulations children up to the age of 12 or a height below 150 cm have to use approved and appropriate child restraint systems (CRS). CRS must be approved according to UN-ECE Regulation No. 44. The regulation classifies CRS in 5 weight categories. The upper weight group is approved for children from 22 to 36 kg. However, studies show that already today many children weigh more than 36 kg although they have not reached a height of 150 cm. Therefore, no ECE R44 approved CRS is available for these overweight children. In conclusion, today's sizes and weights of children are no longer represented by the current version of the ECE R44. The heaviest used dummy (P10) weighs just 32.6 kg and has a height of 137.9 cm. Statistical data of German children show that already 5% of the children at a height of 137.9 cm have a weight above 45.3 kg. Regarding children at a height of 145 cm, the 95th percentile limit is at a weight of 53.3 kg. Based on these data 4 dummies with different heights and weights were defined and produced. Two of them are overweight. Up to now, there is no experience how current child restraint systems perform in a car crash if they are used by children with a weight above 36 kg and a height smaller than 150 cm. In the future, different child restraint systems will be tested with respect to the ECE R44 regulation using these overweight dummies.
The use of proper child restraint systems (CRS) is mandatory for children travelling in cars in most countries of the world. The analysis of the quantity of restrained children shows that more than 90% of the children in Germany are restrained. Looking at the quality of the protection, a large discrepancy between restrained and well protected children can be seen. Two out of three children in Germany are not properly restrained. In addition, considerable difference exists with respect to the technical performance of CRS. For that reason investigations and optimisations on two different topics are necessary: The technical improvement of CRS and the ease of use of CRS. Consideration of the knowledge gained by the comparison of different CRS in crash tests would lead to some improvements of the CRS. But improvement of child safety is not only a technical issue. People should use CRS in the correct way. Misuse and incorrect handling could lead to less safety than correct usage of a poor CRS. For that reason new technical issues are necessary to improve the child safety AND the ease of use. Only the combination of both parts can significantly increase child safety. For the assessment of the safety level of common CRS, frontal and lateral sled tests simulating different severity levels were conducted comparing pairs of CRS which were felt to be good and CRS which were felt to be poor. The safety of some CRS is currently at a high level. All well known products were not damaged in the performed tests. The performance of non-branded CRS was mostly worse than that of the well known products. Although the branded child restraint systems already show a high safety level it is still possible to further improve their technical performance as demonstrated with a baby shell and a harness type CRS.
Proposal for a test procedure of assistance systems regarding preventive pedestrian protection
(2011)
This paper is showing a proposal for a test procedure regarding preventive pedestrian protection based on accident analysis. Over the past years pedestrian protection has become an increasing importance also during the development phase of new vehicles. After a phase of focusing on secondary safety, there are current activities to detect a possible collision by assistance systems. Such systems have the task to inform the driver and/or automatically activate the brakes. How practical is such a system? In which kind of traffic situations will it work? How is it possible to check the effectiveness of such a system? To test the effectiveness, currently there are no generally approved identifiable procedures. It is reasonable that such a test should be based on real accidents. The test procedure should be designed to test all systems, independent of the system- working principle. The vFSS group (advanced Forward-looking Safety Systems) was founded to develop a proposal for a technology independent test procedure, which reflects the real accident situation. This contribution is showing the results of vFSS. The developed test procedure focuses on accidents between passenger cars and pedestrians. The results are based on analysis results of in-depth databases of GIDAS, German insurers and DEKRA and added by analysis of national and international statistics. The in-depth analysis includes many pre-crash situations with several influencing factors. The factors are e. g. speed of the car, speed of the pedestrian, moving direction and a possible obscuration of the pedestrian by an object. The results comprise also the different situations of adults and children. Furthermore, they include details regarding influence of the lighting conditions (daylight or night) especially with respect to the accident consequences. In fact, more accidents happen at daylight, but fatal accidents are more often at night. A clustering of parameter combinations was found which represents typical accident scenarios. There are six typical accident scenarios which were merged in four test scenarios. The test scenarios are varying the starting position of the pedestrian, the pedestrian size (adult or child) and the speed of the pedestrian, whereas the speed of the car will not be varied. To ensure the independency from used sensing technologies it is necessary to use a suitable dummy. For example, if sensors are based on infrared, the dummy should emit the temperature of a human being. The test procedure will identify the collision speed as the key parameter for assessing the effectiveness of the tested system. The collision speed is defined as the reduction between initial test speed of the car and impact speed. The assessment of the speed reduction value regarding the safety benefit, however, will be part of a separate procedure.
To improve vehicle safety in frontal collisions, the crash compatibility between the colliding vehicles is crucial. Compatibility aims to improve both the self and partner protection properties of vehicles. Although compatibility has received worldwide attention for many years, no final assessment approach has been defined. Within the Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research (FIMCAR) project, different frontal impact test procedures (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test as currently used for Economic Commission for Europe [ECE] R94, progressive deformable barrier test as proposed by France for a new ECE regulation, moveable deformable barrier test as discussed worldwide, full-width rigid barrier test as used in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard [FMVSS] 208, and full-width deformable barrier test) were analyzed regarding their potential for future frontal impact legislation. The research activities focused on car-to-car frontal impact accidents based on accident investigations involving newer cars. Test procedures were developed with both a crash test program and numerical simulations. The proposal from FIMCAR is to use a full-width test procedure with a deformable element and compatibility metrics in combination with the current offset test as a frontal impact assessment approach that also addresses compatibility. By adding a full-width test to the current ODB test it is possible to better address the issues of structural misalignment and injuries resulting from high acceleration accidents as observed in the current fleet. The estimated benefit ranges from a 5 to 12 percent reduction of fatalities and serious injuries resulting from frontal impact accidents. By using a deformable element in the full-width test, the test conditions are more representative of real-world situations with respect to acceleration pulse, restraint system triggering time, and deformation pattern of the front structure. The test results are therefore expected to better represent real-world performance of the tested car. Furthermore, the assessment of the structural alignment is more robust than in the rigid wall test.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
A means of assessing the passive safety of automobiles is a desirable instrument for legislative bodies, the automobile industry, and the consumer. As opposed to the dominating motor vehicle assessment criteria, such as engine power, spaciousness, aerodynamics and consumption, there are no clear and generally accepted criteria for assessing the passive safety of cars. The proposed method of assessment combines the results of experimental safety tests, carried out according to existing legally prescribed or currently discussed testing conditions, and a biomechanical validation of the loading values determined in the test. This evaluation is carried out with the aid of risk functions which are specified for individual parts of the body by correlating the results of accident analysis with those obtained by computer simulation. The degree of conformance to the respective protection criterion thus deduced is then weighted with factors which take into account the frequency of occurrence and the severity of the accident on the basis of resulting costs. Each of the test series includes at least two frontal and one lateral crash test against a deformable barrier. The computer-aided analysis and evaluation of the simulation results enables a vehicle-specific overall safety index as well as partial and individual safety values to be determined and plotted graphically. The passive safety provided by the respective vehicle under test can be defined for specific seating positions, special types of accident, or for individual endangered parts of the body.
The off-set assessment procedure potentially contributes to the FIMCAR objectives to maintain the compartment strength and to assess load spreading in frontal collisions. Furthermore it provides the opportunity to assess the restraint system performance with different pulses if combined with a full-width assessment procedure in the frontal assessment approach. Originally it was expected that the PDB assessment procedure would be selected for the FIMCAR assessment approach. However, it was not possible to deliver a compatibility metric in time so that the current off-set procedure (ODB as used in UNECE R94) with some minor modifications was proposed for the FIMCAR Assessment Approach. Nevertheless the potential to assess load spreading, which appears not to be possible with any other assessed frontal impact assessment procedure was considered to be still high. Therefore the development work for the PDB assessment procedure did not stop with the decision not to select the PDB procedure. As a result of the decisions to use the current ODB and to further develop the PDB procedure, both are covered within this deliverable. The deliverable describes the off-set test procedure that will be recommended by FIMCAR consortium, this corresponds to the ODB test as it is specified in UN-ECE Regulation 94 (R94), i.e. EEVC deformable element with 40% overlap at a test speed of 56 km/h. In addition to the current R94 requirements, FIMCAR will recommend to introduce some structural requirements which will guarantee sufficiently strong occupant compartments by enforcing the stability of the forward occupant cell. With respect to the PDB assessment procedure a new metric, Digital Derivative in Y direction - DDY, was developed, described, analysed, and compared with other metrics. The DDY metric analyses the deformation gradients laterally across the PDB face. The more even the deformation, the lower the DDY values and the better the metric- result. In order analyse the different metrics, analysis of the existing PDB test results and the results of the performed simulation studies was performed. In addition, an assessment of artificial deformation profiles with the metrics took place. This analysis shows that there are still issues with the DDY metric but it appears that it is possible to solve them with future optimisations. For example the current metric assesses only the area within 60% of the half vehicle width. For vehicles that have the longitudinals further outboard, the metric is not effective. In addition to the metric development, practical issues of the PDB tests such as the definition of a scan procedure for the analysis of the deformation pattern including the validation of the scanning procedure by the analysis of 3 different scans at different locations of the same barrier were addressed. Furthermore the repeatability and reproducibility of the PDB was analysed. The barrier deformation readings seem to be sensitive with respect to the impact accuracy. In total, the deliverable is meant to define the FIMCAR off-set assessment procedure and to be a starting point for further development of the PDB assessment procedure.
Mit der EU-Verordnung Nummer 661/2009 zur Typgenehmigung und allgemeinen Sicherheit von Kraftfahrzeugen wird von der EU für schwere Nutzfahrzeuge der Einbau von Spurverlassenswarnsystemen und automatischen Notbremssystemen vorgeschrieben. Mit dem obligatorischen Einbau der Systeme wird eine Reduktion der Abkommens- und Auffahrunfälle von Nutzfahrzeugen aus den Klassen M2, M3, N2 und N3, die auf Grund der hohen Masse der Fahrzeuge folgenschwer sind, erwartet. Als Einführungsdaten werden der 1. November 2013 für neue Fahrzeugtypen und der 1. November 2015 für neue Fahrzeuge genannt. Leistungsanforderungen beziehungsweise technische Spezifikationen, denen die Systeme genügen müssen, liegen jedoch noch nicht vor. Diese werden derzeit von einer Expertengruppe auf UN-ECE-Ebene entwickelt. Dabei wird versucht, technologieneutrale Beschreibungen für die Ausgestaltung der Systeme zu erstellen, die gleichzeitig sowohl den gewünschten Nutzen für die Verkehrssicherheit garantieren, sich aber auch an der derzeit vorhandenen und realisierbaren Technologie orientieren. Darüber hinaus müssen die Systemkosten in einem vernünftigen Verhältnis zum Sicherheitsnutzen stehen. Ziel ist es, im Laufe des Jahres 2011 Vorschläge für die Legislative vorzulegen. Es wird über den Stand der Arbeiten, offene Fragestellungen, Herausforderungen bei der Ausgestaltung der technischen Anforderungen sowie sich abzeichnende Ergebnisse berichtet. Dabei sind die Arbeiten in Bezug auf Lane Departure Warning Systems (LDWS) bereits weiter fortgeschritten als zu Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS).
PROSPECT (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) is a collaborative research project involving most of the relevant partners from the automotive industry (including important active safety vehicle manufacturers and tier-1 suppliers) as well as academia and independent test labs, funded by the European Commission in the Horizon 2020 research program. PROSPECT's primary goal is the development of novel active safety functions, to be finally demonstrated to the public in three prototype vehicles. A sound benefit assessment of the prototype vehicle's functionality requires a broad testing methodology which goes beyond what has currently been used. Since PROSPECT functions are developed to prevent accidents in intersections, a key aspect of the test methodology is the reproduction of natural driving styles on the test track with driving robots. For this task, data from a real driving study with subjects in a suburb of Munich, Germany was used. Further data from Barcelona will be available soon. The data suggests that intersection crossing can be broken down into five phases, two phases with straight deceleration / acceleration, one phase with constant radius and speed turning, and two phases where the bend is imitated or ended. In these latter phases, drivers mostly combine lateral and longitudinal accelerations and drive what is called a clothoid, a curve with curvature proportional to distance travelled, in order to change lateral acceleration smoothly rather than abrupt. The data suggests that the main parameter of the clothoid, the ratio distance travelled to curvature, is mostly constant during the intersections. This parameter together with decelerations and speeds allows the generation of synthetic robot program files for a reproduction of natural driving styles using robots, allowing a much greater reproducibility than what is possible with human test drivers. First tests show that in principle it is possible to use the driving robots for vehicle control in that manner; a challenge currently is the control performance of the robot system in terms of speed control, but it is anticipated that this problem will be solved soon. Further elements of the PROSPECT test methodology are a standard intersection marking to be implemented on the test track which allows the efficient testing of all PROSPECT test cases, standard mobile and light obstruction elements for quick reproduction of obstructions of view, and a concept for tests in realistic surroundings. First tests using the PROSPECT test methodology will be conducted over the summer 2017, and final tests of the prototype vehicles developed within PROSPECT will be conducted in early 2018
The head impact of pedestrians in the windscreen area shows a high relevance in real-world accidents. Nevertheless, there are neither biomechanical limits nor elaborated testing procedures available. Furthermore, the development of deployable protection systems like pop-up bonnets or external airbags has made faster progress than the corresponding testing methods. New requirements which are currently not considered are taken into account within a research project of BASt and the EC funded APROSYS (Advanced PROtection SYStems) integrated project relating to passive pedestrian protection. Testing procedures for head impact in the windscreen area should address these new boundary conditions. The presented modular procedure combines the advantages of virtual testing, including full-scale multi-body and finite element simulations, as well as hardware testing containing impactor tests based on the existing procedures of EEVC WG 17. To meet the efforts of harmonization in legislation, it refers to the Global Technical Regulation of UNECE (GTR No. 9). The basis for this combined hardware and virtual testing procedure is a robust categorization covering all passenger cars and light commercial vehicles and defining the testing zone including the related kinematics. The virtual testing part supports also the choice of the impact points for the hardware test and determines head impact timing for testing deployable systems. The assessment of the neck rotation angle and sharp edge contact in the rear gap of pop-up bonnets is included. For the demonstration of this procedure, a hardware sedan shaped vehicle was modified by integrating an airbag system. In addition, tests with the Honda Polar-II Dummy were performed for an evaluation of the new testing procedure. Comparing these results, it was concluded that a combination of simulation and updated subsystem tests forms an important step towards enhanced future pedestrian safety systems considering the windscreen area and the deployable systems.
Neue Herausforderungen an die Unfallforschung durch Fahrerassistenz und automatisiertes Fahren
(2019)
Unfallrekonstruktion hat die Ableitung von Maßnahmen zur Minimierung der Unfallfolgen ermöglicht, vor allem durch Verbesserungen bei passiven Sicherheitseinrichtungen, aber auch durch die Verbesserung der Rettungskette, beispielsweise eCall. Heute können aktive Sicherheitssysteme die Unfallfolgen bereits vor der eigentlichen Kollision reduzieren oder durch Umfeldwahrnehmung und mittels Eingriff in die Fahrzeugsteuerung gegebenenfalls sogar vollständig verhindern. Funktionen, die aktiv in die Fahrzeugsteuerung eingreifen, lassen sich nach ihrer Wirkweise unterscheiden: zum einen handelt es sich um kontinuierlich automatisierende Funktionen, die meist länger aktiv bleiben (zum Beispiel ACC). Zum anderen um Funktionen, die in kritischen Fahrsituationen temporär in die Fahrzeugsteuerung eingreifen. Aufgezeigt wird, welche Konsequenzen und Risiken in Bezug auf diese Systeme sowie für bestimmte (zum Beispiel kritikale) Fahrsituationen anzunehmen sind. Zur Bewertung von aktiven Reglern, die in kritischen Fahrsituationen eingreifen, sind Unfalldaten nur noch eingeschränkt tauglich. Ähnliches gilt für die Bewertung von Ereignissen/ Zuständen im Rahmen kontinuierlicher Fahrzeugsteuerung, vor allem, wenn diese weiter vorausliegen. Wirkzusammenhänge automatisierter Fahrfunktionen müssen jedoch - gerade für den Mischverkehr mit konventionell gesteuerten Fahrzeugen - identifiziert werden. Dafür wird eine Szenariendatenbank mit relevanten Verkehrssituationen benötigt, in die Daten aus Naturalistic Driving Studies (NDS), aus Fahrversuchen oder Versuchen im Fahrsimulator eingehen können. Die zunehmende Durchdringung der Fahrzeugflotte mit kontinuierlich automatisierten Fahrfunktionen lässt eine Abnahme kritischer Fahrsituationen und eine Reduktion der Zahl der Verkehrsopfer erwarten. Allerdings verbleibt eine Restzahl an systemimmanenten Unfällen, die als unvermeidbar gelten müssen.
Sowohl mit dem 3. Road Safety Action Programme der Europäischen Kommission als auch mit dem deutschen Verkehrssicherheitsprogramm werden die verkehrspolitischen Zielsetzungen zur Erhöhung der Verkehrssicherheit in Europa und Deutschland festgelegt. Hierbei muss die passive Fahrzeugsicherheit auch weiterhin eine bedeutende Rolle übernehmen. Es ist jedoch auch festzustellen, dass durch den zunehmenden Einsatz von Elektronik im Fahrzeug die klassischen Bereiche der aktiven und passiven Fahrzeugsicherheit mehr und mehr ineinander greifen. Der Fortschritt in der Elektronik ermöglicht eine Integration der Systeme der aktiven und passiven Sicherheit. Dadurch lässt sich die Fahrzeugsicherheit weiter steigern. Durch die Vernetzung der Systeme lassen sich sogar Kosten einsparen. Der europäische Regierungsausschuss EEVC (European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee), die Verbraucherschutzorganisation Euro NCAP (European New Car Assessment Programme) und die Europäische Kommission mit der eSafety Initiative haben diesen Trend erkannt und entsprechende Aktivitäten eingeleitet.
Within the process of integrating passenger airbags in the vehicle fleet a problem of compatibility between the passenger airbag and rear-facing child restraint systems was recognised. Especially in the US several accidents with children killed by the passenger airbag were recorded. Taking into account these accidents the deactivation of a present passenger airbag is mandatory if a child is carried in a rear-facing child restraint system at the front passenger seat in all member states of the European Union. This rule is in force since the deadline of 2003/20/EC at the latest. In the past a passenger airbag either could not be disabled or could only be disabled by a garage. Today there are a lot of different possibilities for the car driver himself to disable the airbag. Solutions like an on/off-switch or the automatic detection of a child restraint system are mentioned as an example. Taking into account the need for the deactivation of front passenger airbags two types of misuse can occur: transportation of an infant while the airbag is (still) enabled and transportation of an adult, while the airbag is disabled, respectively. Within a research project funded by BASt both options of misuse were analysed utilising two different types of surveys amongst users (field observations and interviews, Internet-questionnaires). In addition both analysis of accident data and crash tests for an updated assessment of the injury risk caused by the front passenger airbag were conducted. Both surveys indicate a low risk of misuse. Most of the misuse cases were observed in older cars, which offer no easy way to disable the airbag. For systems, which detect a child seat automatically, no misuse could be found. The majority of misuses in cars equipped with a manual switch were caused by reasons of oblivion. Also the accident analysis indicates a minor risk of misuse. From more than 300 cases of the GIDAS accident sample that were analysed, only 24 children were using the front passenger seat in cars equipped with a front passenger airbag. In most of these cases the airbag was deactivated. When misuse occurred the injury severity was low. However, when analysing German single accidents the fatality risk caused by the front passenger airbag became obvious. From the technical point of view, there were important changes in the design of passenger airbags in recent years. Not only volume and shape were modified, but also the mounting position of the entire airbag module was changed fundamentally. Even if these findings do not allow obtaining general conclusions, a clear tendency of less danger by airbags could be identified. For future vehicle development a safe combination of airbags and rear faced baby seats seems to be possible in the long term. This would mean that both types of misuse could be eliminated. For parents an easier use of child seat and car would be the result.
Ziel des Projektes war die Untersuchung der fahrdynamischen Besonderheiten der stationären, besonders jedoch der instationären Kurvenfahrt (Kurvenbremsung) von einspurigen Kraftfahrzeugen. Hierbei waren die Bewertung von Bremswirkung und Fahrstabilität unterschiedlicher Bremssysteme (Standardbremse, Kombibremse, ABV-Systeme) bei Kurvenbremsung sowie die Quantifizierung fahrer-, fahrzeug-, und fahrbahnseitiger Einflussparameter von besonderer Bedeutung. Hierzu werden zunächst die physikalischen und fahrdynamischen Grundlagen erarbeitet und der theoretische Ablauf der Kurvenbremsung betrachtet. Es folgte die experimentelle Erfassung des Kurvenbremsverhaltens im Straßenfahrversuch unter Verwendung der unterschiedlichen Bremssysteme und der Variation aller relevanter Parameter. Anschließend erfolgte die rechnergestützte Auswertung der experimentellen Ergebnisse sowie die Bewertung der unterschiedlichen Bremssysteme und Einflussgrößen. Als wichtigste Ergebnisse der Untersuchung können folgende Punkte gelten: - Alle untersuchten Bremssysteme können hinsichtlich des querdynamischen Verhaltens (Kurshaltung, Fahrstabilität) nicht befriedigen. - Effiziente Abbremsung in Kurvenfahrt mit ausreichender Bremssicherheit ist mit einer ABV-geregelten Kombibremsanlage zu erreichen unter der Voraussetzung, dass die ABV-Regelung nicht aktiviert wird, sondern das ABV-System lediglich als Überbremsungsschutz fungiert. - Die herkömmliche ungeregelte Standardbremse birgt mit zunehmender Querbeschleunigung eskalierende Sturzrisiken. Beim derzeitigen Stand der Technik lassen ABV-Systeme eine ausreichend fahr- und kursstabile Kurvenbremsung mit befriedigender Verzögerung zu, wenn nahe an der Regelungsschwelle gebremst wird. Wegen des hierbei dominierenden Einflusses des Vorderrades ist die Verbindung eines auf beide Räder wirkenden ABV-Systems mit einer lastabhängigen Kombibremse und voreilend überbremstem Hinterrad zu empfehlen.
Mit den Schwerpunkten Fahrstabilität, Kurshaltung und Kraftschlussausnutzung wurden die theoretischen und fahrdynamischen Grundlagen für die fahrsichere Motorrad-Kurvenbremsung mit einem kurventauglichen Bremssystem untersucht. In theoretischen Betrachtungen wurden ein Bremskraftregelungs- und das zugehörige Sensorkonzept sowie Maßnahmen zur Schräglaufbegrenzung (Fahrstabilität/Kraftschlussausnutzung) und zur Ausschaltung des Bremslenkmoments (Kurshaltung) erarbeitet. Die elektronische Bremskraftregelung baut auf einer dynamisch lastabhängigen Kombibremse mit voreilend überbremstem Hinterrad auf. Die Sensorik umfasst Raddrehzahlen (bzw. -änderungen), dynamische Radlasten, Radseitenkräfte und Fahrzeugrollwinkel. Das Sensorkonzept ermöglicht indirekte Messung des aktuellen Umfangs- und Seitenkraftschlussbedarfs und bietet einen Ansatz für eine kraftschlussorientierte Bremskraftregelung. Die Radkraftmessung erkennt den Beginn einer querdynamischen Destabilisierung frühzeitig und eindeutig; dies konnte im fahrdynamischen Experiment ebenso bestätigt werden wie die Praxistauglichkeit der von der Forschungsstelle neu entwickelten und gebauten Sensorik. Die kraftschlussorientierte Radregelung ist notwendigerweise angewiesen auf die Kenntnis des Reifenkraftübertragungsverhaltens. Dieses wurde mit einem Motorradreifenmessanhänger der Forschungsstelle auf realen Fahrbahnen exemplarisch untersucht. Mit seiner Hilfe kann für jeden Betriebspunkt der Kurvenbremsung der aktuelle Schräglauf an beiden Rädern bestimmt werden. Alle erfassten Daten können für weitere zukünftige Sicherheitssysteme genutzt werden. Es ist vorgesehen, das entworfene Bremskraftregelungskonzept einschließlich der Maßnahmen zur Schräglauf- und Bremslenkmomentbegrenzung zu realisieren und die hiermit zu erzielenden Verbesserungen im fahrdynamischen Experiment nachzuweisen. Die Messungen zum Reifenverhalten sollen fortgesetzt und auf den dynamischen Bereich ausgedehnt werden.
Teil 1: Die vorliegende Untersuchung befasst sich mit der optimalen Kennzeichnung von Lkw und Anhängern. Der Bericht ist in vier Abschnitte unterteilt: Nach einer Einleitung mit Informationen über die Seh- und Wahrnehmungsbedingungen werden die internationalen Kennzeichnungsvorschriften dargestellt.Der zweite Teil beschäftigt sich mit Grundlagenuntersuchungen zur Gestaltung und Wirksamkeit von zusätzlichen Kennzeichnungen für Lkw. Die Vorgängeruntersuchungen mit homogenem Umfeld werden neuen Ergebnissen der Untersuchungen von Lkw und Anhängern in strukturierten Umfeldern gegenübergestellt. In Bezug auf die Wahrnehmbarkeit und die Erkennbarkeit zeigen sich sowohl in homogenen als auch in strukturierten Umfeldern, dass eine Linien- oder Konturkennzeichnung am besten geeignet ist. Darüber hinaus bieten diese Kennzeichnungen die Möglichkeit, den Lkw zu identifizieren. Hingegen werden die heute üblichen punktartigen Kennzeichungen oft mit anderen Verkehrsteilnehmern verwechselt, was zu gefährlichen Verkehrssituationen bei Nacht führen kann. Für optimale Wahrnehmbarkeit müssen diese Kennzeichnungen eine Leuchtdichte von etwa 10 cd/m2 aufweisen. Im dritten Teil werden neuere Messungen des Feldversuches dargestellt. Neben den Angaben über spezifische Rückstrahlwerte der Kennzeichnungen werden deren auftretende Leuchtdichten im Verkehr gezeigt. Ferner werden Hinweise gegeben, in welcher Form die Kennzeichnungen an den verschiedenen Lkw-Aufbauten angebracht werden können. Abschließend wird eine Unfallanalyse dargestellt.Zum einen wurden hier in Zusammenarbeit mit dem HUK-Verband sämtliche Lkw-Unfälle in Bayern aus dem Jahre 1984 ausgewertet. Es zeigte sich, dass mehr als ein Drittel aller nächtlichen Lkw-Seiten- und Heck-Unfälle auf die Unfallursache "nicht oder zu spät erkannter Lkw" zurückzuführen sind. Eine begleitende Unfallanalyse der Lkw im Feldversuch für das Jahr 1991 ergab, dass sich in der gekennzeichneten Gruppe ein Unfall mit dieser Unfallursache ereignete. In der etwa gleich großen Vergleichsgruppe ergaben sich 15 Unfälle mit dieser Ursache. Damit konnten die Ergebnisse des Vorjahres bestätigt werden, die den positiven Einfluss von Linien- und Konturkennzeichnungen für Lkw auf das Unfallgeschehen zeigten.rnTeil 2: Der vorliegende Bericht enthält die Entwürfe für eine Neuformulierung der ECE-Regelungen 69 und 70, die sich mit Mitteln zur besseren Wahrnehmbarkeit und Erkennbarkeit von LKW, Anhängern und langsam fahrenden Fahrzeugen beschäftigen. Die Originalversionen von ECE-Regelung 69 (Stand Oktober 1989) und Regelung 70 (Stand März 1990) sind teilweise neuformuliert oder erweitert. Der hauptsächliche Änderungsvorschlag im Entwurf der ECE-Regelung 69 besteht in einem Ersatz des rot-fluoreszierenden inneren Dreiecks durch ein rot retroreflektierendes Dreieck. Der Entwurf der ECE-Regelung 70 wurde um die seitliche und rückwärtige Linien- und Konturkennzeichnung erweitert. Die rückwärtigen Kennzeichnungstafeln (Kennzeichnungsschilder) sollen weiter verwendet werden dürfen, wobei auch hier die rot-fluroeszierenden Flächen durch rot-retroreflektierende Flächen ersetzt werden sollen. Es wird der Oberbegriff der Markierung eingeführt, der sich in einzelne Klassen aufteilt: Klasse 1: Hintere Kennzeichnungstafel (Hinteres Kennzeichnungsschild) für Kraftfahrzeuge (Motorfahrzeuge); Klasse 2: Hintere Kennzeichnungstafel (Hinteres Kennzeichnungsschild) für Anhänger; Klasse 5: Seitliche und rückwärtige Linienkennzeichnung; Klasse 6: Seitliche und rückwärtige rechteckige Konturkennzeichnung; Klasse 7: rückwärtige runde und ovale Konturkennzeichnung.
Ziel des Forschungsprojektes war der Vergleich verschiedener lichttechnischer Einrichtungen an Fahrrädern zur besseren Erkennbarkeit im nächtlichen Straßenverkehr. Dabei sollten neben der Wahrnehmbarkeit auch der Symbolcharakter der lichttechnischen Einrichtungen untersucht werden. Die Versuche teilten sich in Laboruntersuchungen und dynamische Fahrversuche. Dabei wurden die Wahrnehmbarkeit und die Erkennbarkeit der unterschiedlichen Muster bewertet. Für die Kenntlichmachung von Fahrrädern nach vorne und hinten erwiesen sich großflächige passive Markierungen als sinnvolle Ergänzungen zum Scheinwerfer und Rücklicht. Die beste Wahrnehmbarkeit eines Radfahrers von hinten wird erzielt, indem man ihn mit einem zusätzlichen Scheinwerfer beleuchtet. Als Kenntlichmachung zur Seite eignet sich am besten eine geschlossene oder segmentierte Konturmarkierung der Reifen. Neben einer nur geringen notwendigen Leuchtdichte zur Wahrnehmung erlauben diese Kenntlichmachungen auch sofort die Zuordnung zu einem Fahrrad.
Es wird über das Ende 2002 abgeschlossene EU-Projekt ADVISORS berichtet. Ziel dieses Projektes, an dem sich 16 Organisationen aus 10 europäischen Ländern beteiligten, war es, die Entwicklung, Testung und Implementierung von Fahrerassistenzsystemen (FAS) zu unterstützen. Es wurde eine umfassende Methodik zur Bewertung von FAS entwickelt und auf dieser Basis wurden eine Reihe von Evaluationsstudien zu ausgewählten FAS durchgeführt. Des Weiteren wurden Implementierungsstrategien für bestimmte FAS entwickelt und mit Experten verschiedener Länder diskutiert.
In Form einer Pilotstudie wurden eine Literaturrecherche, eine Befragung von Experten der Automobilindustrie und theoretische Untersuchungen zur Frage der Head-Up-Display-Technik (HUD) im Kraftfahrzeug durchgeführt. Auf der Suche nach neuen, die Sicherheit des Kraftfahrzeugverkehrs fördernden Anzeigen findet das HUD zunehmend Interesse. Das Prinzip des HUD im Kraftfahrzeug besteht darin, dass die Informationen des Displays über den in die Windschutzscheibe integrierten Combiner in die Verkehrsszene als virtuelles Bild eingeblendet werden. In Europa wurden von Automobil- und Zulieferfirmen ca. ein Dutzend HUD-Systeme als Experimentalsysteme entwickelt. In den europäischen Forschungsprogrammen PROMETHEUS und DRIVE wird das HUD als eine von mehreren neuen Anzeigetechniken untersucht. In den USA und Japan befinden sich HUD-Systeme in Serienfahrzeugen bereits seit einigen Jahren auf dem Markt. Informationen auf einem HUD im Kraftfahrzeug werden schneller und sicherer abgelesen, als auf der konventionellen Instrumententafel. Insbesondere die physiologischen Anteile des Wahrnehmungsvorganges, das heißt die Augenbewegung, das Akkommodieren und das Adaptieren, erfolgen mit einem HUD schneller. Allerdings kann die Verquickung der Verkehrsszene mit bordeigenen Informationen zu verändertem Fahrverhalten und zu anderen Beobachtungsstrategien der Kraftfahrer führen. Die HUD-Technik ist zwar relativ fortgeschritten, jedoch liegen nur wenige fundierte experimentelle Ergebnisse vor. Es wurde daher eine Untersuchungsreihe mit Labor-, Simulator- und Feldexperimenten entworfen, die offene Fragen zu Nutzen, Informationsinhalten und Gestaltung von HUD-Anzeigen beantworten sollen. Gesetzliche Vorschriften der StVZO und die sie tangierenden EG-Richtlinien beziehungsweise ECE-Regelungen legen die Mindestanforderungen an die Sicht aus Kraftfahrzeugen fest, und es bestehen Vorgaben sowohl für die mögliche Position der HUD-Anzeigen, als auch für die Transmission und für die Farberkennung der Verkehrsobjekte.
The objective of this deliverable is to describe the expected influence of the candidate test procedures developed in FIMCAR for frontal impact on other impact types. The other impact types of primary interest are front-to-side impacts, collisions with road restraint systems (e.g. guardrails), and heavy goods vehicle impacts. These collision types were chosen as they involve structures that can be adapted to improve safety. Collisions with vulnerable road users (VRU) were not explicitly investigated in FIMCAR. It is expected that the vehicle structures of interest in FIMCAR can be designed into a VRU friendly shell. Information used for this deliverable comes from simulations and car-to-car crash tests conducted in FIMCAR or review of previous research. Three test configurations (full width, offset, and moving deformable barriers) were the input to the FIMCAR selection process. There are three different types of offset tests and two different full width tests. During the project test procedures could be divided into three groups that provide different influences or outcomes on vehicle designs: 1. The ODB barrier provides a method to assess part of the vehicles energy absorption capabilities and compartment test in one test. 2. The FWRB and FWDB have similar capabilities to control structural alignment, further assess energy absorption capabilities, and promote the improvements in the occupant restraint system for high deceleration impacts. 3. The PDB and MPDB can be used to promote better load spreading in the vehicle structures, in addition to assessing energy absorption and occupant compartment strength in an offset configuration. The consortium selected the ODB and FWDB as the two best candidates for short term application in international rulemaking. The review of how all candidates would affect vehicle performance in other impacts (beside front-to-front vehicle or frontal impacts with fixed obstacles) however is reported in this deliverable to support the benefit analysis reported in FIMCAR. The grouping presented above is used to discuss all five test candidates using similarities between certain tests and thereby simplify the discussion.
Despite the steadily declining number of pedestrian fatalities and injuries in most European countries during recent decades, pedestrian protection is still of great importance in the European Union as well as in Germany. This is because they still constitute a large proportion of road user casualties and are more likely to suffer serious and fatal injuries than most other road users. In 1999 only car occupants suffered more fatal injuries than pedestrians in Germany. In December 1998, EEVC WG 17 completed their review and updating of the EEVC WG 10 pedestrian test procedure that made it possible to evaluate the protection afforded to pedestrians by the front of passenger cars in an accident. Within the scope of this procedure, four different impactors are used representing those parts of the body which are injured very often and/or very seriously in vehicle-pedestrian-collisions. In a project executed by IKA and BASt, a small family car was tested according to the EEVC WG 17 test procedure. Afterwards modifications to the car were carried out in order to improve the pedestrian protection provided by the vehicle design. There were certain restrictions placed on the level of modifications undertaken, e.g. only minor modifications to vehicle styling and to the vehicle structures, which provide passenger protection. The redesigned vehicle was tested again using the WG 17 test procedure. The test results of the modified vehicle were compared with those of the standard vehicle and evaluated. The results show that considered measures for pedestrian protection in many areas of the vehicle front structure and the use of innovative techniques can lead to a significant reduction of the loads of pedestrians at an acceptable expense.
This paper provides an overview of the research work of the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) in the field of crash compatibility between passenger cars. Since July 1997 the EC Commission is partly funding the research work of EEVC. The running period of this project will be two years. The progress of five working packages of this research project is presented: Literature review, Accident analysis, Structural survey of cars, Crash testing, and Mathematical modelling. According to the planned time schedule the progress of research work is different for the five working packages.
Recent accident statistics from the German national database state bicyclists being the second endangered group of vulnerable road users besides pedestrians. With 399 fatalities, more than 14.000 seriously injured and more than 61.000 slightly injured persons on german roads in the year 2011, the group of bicyclists is ranked second of all road user groups (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2012). While the overall bicycle helmet usage frequency in Germany is very low, evidence is given that its usage leads to a significant reduction of severe head injuries. After an estimation of the benefit of bicycle helmet usage as well as an appropriate test procedure for bicyclists, this paper describes two different approaches for the improvement of bicyclist safety. While the first one is focusing on the assessment of the vehicle based protection potential for bicyclists, the second one is concentrating on the safety assessment of bicycle helmets. Within the first part of the study the possible revision of the existing pedestrian testing protocols is being examined, using in depth accident data, full scale simulation and hardware testing. Within the second part of the study, the results of tests according to supplemental test procedures for the safety assessment of bicycle helmets developed by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) are presented. An additional full scale test performed at reduced impact speed proves that measures of active vehicle safety as e.g. braking before the collision event do not necessarily always lead to a reduction of injury severity.
A flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been evaluated by a Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG) of the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN-ECE). It will be implemented within phase 2 of the global technical regulation (GTR 9) as well as within a new ECE regulation on pedestrian safety as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents (UN-ECE 2010-1, 2010-2 and 2010-3). Due to its biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia section, the FlexPLI is found to having an improved knee and tibia injury assessment ability when being compared to the current legislative test tool, the lower legform impactor developed by the Pedestrian Safety Working Group of the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC WG 17). However, due to a lack of biofidelity in terms of kinematics and loadings in the femur part of the FlexPLI, an appropriate assessment of femur injuries is still outstanding. The study described in this paper is aimed to close this gap. Impactor tests with the FlexPLI at different impact heights on three vehicle frontends with Sedan, SUV and FFV shape are performed and compared to tests with a modified FlexPLI with upper body mass. Full scale validation tests using a modified crash test dummy with attached FlexPLI that are carried out for the first time prove the more humanlike responses of the femur section with applied upper body mass. Apart from that they also show that the impact conditions described in the current technical provisions for tests with the FlexPLI don"t necessarily compensate the missing torso mass in terms of knee and tibia loadings either. Therefore it can be concluded that an applied upper body mass will contribute to a more biofidelic overall behavior of the legform and subsequently an improved injury assessment ability of all lower extremity injuries addressed by the FlexPLI. Nevertheless, the validity of the original as well as the modified legform for tests against vehicles with extraordinary high bumpers as well as flat front vehicles still needs to be evaluated in detail. A first clue is given by the application of an additional accelerometer to the legform.
The market introduction and penetration of electric vehicles can be seen as a milestone in order to reduce the environmental burden imposed by the transport sector. The wide-spread use of electric vehicles powered by electricity from renewable sources promises a substantial reduction of local emissions in urban areas as well as greenhouse gas emissions. To be a successful mobility alternative several obstacles and challenges have to be overcome first. Especially the customers' purchase decision determines finally whether an innovation like electromobility will be successful. Therefore, this paper concentrates on demand-related obstacles and barriers for a broad market deployment of electric cars. Within the Electromobility+ project eMAP these issues are investigated via a consumer survey. It was designed to identify the awareness of potential consumers of electric cars as well as give an estimate of the attitude towards this new technology. In addition to the picture of potential demand-related obstacles the consumers were asked to evaluate the suitability of various promotion measures.
The "Autonomous driving on the roads of the future: Villa Ladenburg Project" by the Daimler und Benz-Stiftung looks at degrees of automation that will only become technically feasible in the distant future. The treatment of the legal questions in the present chapter therefore draws heavily on the description of the use cases, which begin to provide a concrete basis for evaluating individual issues. Uncertainties in predicting future technical developments can be expected and will have a commensurate impact on the assumptions and conclusions of this chapter. The resulting uncertainty is nevertheless unavoidable if one wants to press ahead with important interrelated issues. This chapter is therefore intended as a contribution to the debate on societal aspects of automated driving from a legal perspective and not as a legalistic evaluation of the subject. The consideration will largely focus on the situation within the context of current German law. The legal views expressed are those of the author and are based on nine years of experience in the field of driver assistance system research. In terms of the underlying conception presented here, the societal dimension of autonomous vehicles addressed in the present project goes well beyond the adjustments to the legal framework currently being called for in Germany. The following will examine the question of "societal acceptance" in the context of the legal questions raised by autonomous vehicles. This line of investigation is not immediately obvious and covers only a segment of the more thoroughgoing focus of the project.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and the final report to the steering committee on frontal impact [Faerber 2007] and the FP5 VC-COMPAT[Edwards 2007] project activities, two test approaches were identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis will be performed. In the FIMCAR Deliverable D 3.1 [Adolph 2013] the development and assessment of criteria and associated performance limits for the full width test procedure were reported. In this Deliverable D3.2 analyses of the test data (full width tests, car-to-car tests and component tests), further development and validation of the full width assessment protocol and development of the load cell and load cell wall specification are reported. The FIMCAR full-width assessment procedure consists of a 50 km/h test against the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB). The Load Cell Wall behind the deformable element assesses whether or not important Energy Absorbing Structures are within the Common Interaction Zone as defined based on the US part 581 zone. The metric evaluates the row forces and requires that the forces directly above and below the centre line of the Common Interaction Zone exceed a minimum threshold. Analysis of the load spreading showed that metrics that rely on sum forces of rows and columns are within acceptable tolerances. Furthermore it was concluded that the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the FWDB test is acceptable. The FWDB test was shown to be capable to detect lower load paths that are beneficial in car-to-car impacts.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were to review existing full-width test procedures and their discussed compatibility metrics, to report recent activities and findings with respect to full-width assessment procedures and to assess test procedures and metrics. Starting with a review of previous work, candidate metrics and associated performance limits to assess a vehicle- structural interaction potential, in particular its structural alignment, have been developed for both the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB) and Full Width Rigid Barrier (FWRB) tests. Initial work was performed to develop a concept to assess a vehicle- frontal force matching. However, based on the accident analyses performed within FIMCAR frontal force matching was not evaluated as a first priority and thus in line with FIMCAR strategy the focus was put on the development of metrics for the assessment of structural interaction which was evaluated as a first priority.
The term driver assistance systems in the chapter title shall be understood to include vehicle automation. This chapter starts with a homogeneous and consistent classification and nomenclature of all kinds of driver assistance systems known and under discussion today (including vehicle automation). It thereby builds upon familiar classification schemes by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and the standardization body SAE international. Detailed evaluation of the German legal situation for driver assistance systems and vehicle automation is provided in the following Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, an overview is given on the legal system in the US to reveal aspects relevant for vehicle automation. This is intended as initial information for those not acquainted to the US legal system which has been the first to regulate automation in several federal states. Finally, in Sect. 4, the current rating scheme of the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) is presented in comparison to legal instruments. The model of a consumer protection based approach proves to be a flexible instrument with great advantages in promoting new technologies. Technical vehicle regulations on the other hand rule minimum requirements. Both approaches are needed to achieve maximum vehicle safety.
Für eine quantitativ exakte Beschreibung der mit der Gefahrgutbeförderung verbundenen Risiken fehlen sowohl statistische Voraussetzungen als auch eine wissenschaftlich begründete Risikoanalyse. Eine Risikoanalyse der Gefahrgutbeförderung soll zweckmäßigerweise auf Transportketten und nicht auf den direkten Vergleich von Verkehrsträgern abstellen. Zentrale Kategorie zur Definition des Risikos sollte dabei der Unfall sein. Zusammen mit der Transportleistung sollte er das Risiko als Wahrscheinlichkeitsaussage beschreiben. Mit in die Risikobestimmung einzubeziehen ist die Unfallschwere. Im Rahmen des Beitrages schlägt eine Projektgruppe eine dreistufig angelegte Risikoanalyse vor. Die Bausteine dieser Risikoanalyse bestehen aus 1. einer mathematisch-statistischen Risikoanalyse, 2. einer Schwachstellenanalyse und 3. einem Systemmodell zur ständigen Analyse des Gefahrgutbeförderungsrisikos. Dazu werden in dem Forschungsbericht grundsätzliche Überlegungen zur Risikobewertung angestellt, auf das Regelwerk des Gefahrguttransportes eingegangen, Ausbildung, Training und Überprüfung der Fahrzeugführer behandelt sowie auf das Gefahrgut und die Gefahrgutumschließung eingegangen. Ferner befasst sich der Bericht mit der Fahrzeugtechnik, der Verkehrsinfrastruktur, Informationssystemen und der Sicherheit im Gefahrguttransport in den neuen Bundesländern. Zum Schluss werden Forschungsempfehlungen bezüglich der Sicherheit in der Gefahrgutbeförderung formuliert.
Although the bus belongs to the safest traffic means, single accidents can be particularly severe and concern many passengers. Especially in case of fires a high number of injured and killed persons can be the outcome. Fire safety of buses therefore is of high importance. With the increase of synthetic and plastic materials as a material for the interior equipment of buses and coaches because of their ood mechanical properties combined with low weight, the question arises whether the safety level has decreased in case of a fire during the last years - also compared to other means of transport. Because of the combustible plastics and their ability to release a high amount of heat the main fire load in buses is no longer the fuel but the plastic materials which are also often easy to ignite. Besides the flammability of the equipments, the production of smoke, the smoke development and propagation and its toxicity for the people as well as the testing methods and limit values are of interest. For those reasons research projects were initiated on behalf of the German Federal Highway Research Institute. At the one hand the fire behavior of coach interiors was examined in general focusing on fire propagation as well as fire detection and signalling. As result, recommendations with regard to early fire detection systems for the engine compartments and on-board extinguishing equipment were elaborated. At the other hand research is carried out to examine heat release, smoke, smoke propagation and its toxicity due to burning bus interior materials. The paper describes which effective and economically reasonable fire safety requirements for interiors of buses would improve the current situation. Proposals for amendments of current requirements are recommended including the specification of appropriate limit values. In particular, it is taken into consideration which reasonable fire safety standards from other transport sectors, especially the rail sector, should be transferred to buses.
The objectives of the FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) project are to answer the remaining open questions identified in earlier projects (such as understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of force based metrics and barrier deformation based metrics, confirmation of specific compatibility issues such as structural interaction, investigation of force matching) and to finalise the frontal impact test procedures required to assess compatibility. Research strategies and priorities were based on earlier research programs and the FIMCAR accident data analysis. The identified real world safety issues were used to develop a list of compatibility characteristics which were then prioritised within the consortium. This list was the basis for evaluating the different test candidates. This analysis resulted in the combination of the Full Width Deformable Barrier test (FWDB) with compatibility metrics and the existing Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) as described in UN-ECE Regulation 94 with additional cabin integrity requirement as being proposed as the FIMCAR assessment approach. The proposed frontal impact assessment approach addresses many of the issues identified by the FIMCAR consortium but not all frontal impact and compatibility issues could be addressed.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions, the crash compatibility between the colliding vehicles is crucial. Compatibility compromises both the self protection and the partner protection properties of vehicles. For the accident data analysis, the CCIS (GB) and GIDAS (DE) in-depth data bases were used. Selection criteria were frontal car accidents with car in compliance with ECE R94. For this study belted adult occupants in the front seats sustaining MAIS 2+ injuries were studied. Following this analysis FIMCAR concluded that the following compatibility issues are relevant: - Poor structural interaction (especially low overlap and over/underriding) - Compartment strength - Frontal force mismatch with lower priority than poor structural interaction In addition injuries arising from the acceleration loading of the occupant are present in a significant portion of frontal crashes. Based on the findings of the accident analysis the aims that shall be addressed by the proposed assessment approach were defined and priorities were allocated to them. The aims and priorities shall help to decide on suitable test procedures and appropriate metrics. In general it is anticipated that a full overlap and off-set test procedure is the most appropriate set of tests to assess a vehicle- frontal impact self and partner protection.
New vehicle types are extensively tested to check almost all factors that influence ride and handling. With reference to the Association of German Car Tuners" (VDAT e.V.) valuations, approximately 10% of all cars in Germany are being modified by their owners. 28 % of those modifications" sales are divergent wheel-tire combinations, 13 % are tuning measures on the chassis suspension or wheel spacers. In almost all cases the singular modifications present a general permission for specific vehicles they have been tested in. Combined tuning measures, however, are often checked by just one inspector, following a procedure of mostly subjective assessment criteria. Today, critical attributes are only being observed, in case a vehicle is involved in an accident and the modifications are identified as crash causal factors or as a cofactor on the development of a crash. For the first time, a field study allows a survey of safety affecting chassis modifications. The test layout has to comply with some basic conditions. Different vehicle concepts with a wide margin of modifications are required to get a high transferability of the results. A total amount of more than 150 tested vehicles serves the same purpose. The tests are limited concerning the installation time of measurement techniques and the requirement that no damage, defilement or immoderate wear of the vehicles are accepted by their owners. Due to such factors as well as the driver Ìs acceptance, the vehicles are controlled by its owners instead of robots or test drivers. For keeping down the driver- influence, the lane has narrow boundaries and the driver has to drive in strictly adherence to the given instructions. After gathering all modifications, as well as static and kinematic parameters like the toe and camber angle, dynamic testing of predominantly lateral dynamics is conducted. Besides standardized tests like the ISO 3888-2 (Obstacle Avoidance) or the ISO 14512 (Braking on Surfaces with Split Coefficient of Friction), to test the influence of modified kingpin offsets caused by wheel spacers, some deviant tests are conducted. Those are required due to the demand of objective test results for road tests with vertical induced stimulation of the chassis suspension. Hence, new tests on corner braking with and without vertical stimulation have been developed. The interpretation of data includes thresholds, e.g. the maximum entrance velocity without hitting cones, on the one hand, and the analysis of characteristics of data concerning time and frequency range, "1-second values" and peak response times on the other hand. Besides the thresholds as indicators for the achievable velocities, which are mainly affected by friction coefficients, the vehicle reaction in the course of time characterizes the vehicle reaction in the threshold range and consequently the operational demands on the driver. The field study has started and promises the first long-range analysis of chassis modifications. The results offer a basis for hypothesis and resultant further test layouts for oncoming studies of the identified critical tuning measures.
Vor dem Hintergrund der derzeitigen Verkehrs- und Unfallsituation sowie verkehrsrechtlicher Vorschriften wurde durch Auswertung humanwissenschaftlicher und technischer Literatur eine Sachstandsbeschreibung erstellt, die die in Zusammenhang mit Auffahrunfällen und ihrer Verhinderung stehenden Aspekte aufzeigt. Als fahrzeugtechnische Hilfen zur Einhaltung eines ausreichenden Abstandes zwischen hintereinander fahrenden Fahrzeugen werden dabei vorrangig autarke Systeme - das sind solche, bei denen sich alle notwendigen Vorrichtungen im Fahrzeug befinden - betrachtet. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der bekannten technischen Hilfsmittel, insbesondere der Abstandswarn- und Abstandsregelungseinrichtungen werden aufgezeigt. Es stellte sich heraus, dass den Warnstrategien sowie ihren Auswirkungen auf den Verkehrsablauf und die Verkehrssicherheit besondere Bedeutung zukommt. In diesem Zusammenhang werden auch Zielkonflikte, insbesondere zwischen Sicherheitsforderungen und Fahrerakzeptanz, deutlich. Im Teil I des Berichts erfolgt die zusammenfassende Beschreibung und kritische Wertung des Sachstandes. Im Teil II werden die Auswerteergebnisse zu den angesprochenen Fragenkomplexen im einzelnen dargestellt. Teil III enthält eine Kurzdokumentation der für die Erstellung des Berichts wesentlichsten Literaturstellen.
Die zukünftige Entwicklung der Straßenverkehrssicherheit und damit auch der Fahrzeugsicherheit wird durch gesellschaftliche, wirtschaftliche, klimapolitische und verkehrspolitische Rand- und Rahmenbedingungen und die voranschreitende technische Entwicklung geprägt sein, die auch für den Gesetzgeber eine Herausforderung darstellen. So wird sich auch das Folgeprogramm des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS) für das derzeitige aus dem Jahr 2001 stammende "Programm für mehr Sicherheit im Straßenverkehr" an den Schwerpunkten des "4th Road Safety Action Programme" ausrichten, das im Frühjahr 2010 durch die EU-Kommission veröffentlicht werden soll. Im Prozess zu einer weiteren Verbesserung der Straßenverkehrssicherheit werden unter anderem der demografische Wandel in unserer Gesellschaft, die durch eine erforderliche CO2-Reduktion bedingte Einführung alternativer Antriebe (Elektromobilität) verbunden mit Leichtbau sowie die gesetzlichen Rahmenbedingung (Wiener Abkommen) eine bedeutende Rolle spielen. Die Klärung der gesetzlichen Rahmenbedingungen ist unerlässlich, um die Vision vom unfallfreien Fahren Realität werden lassen zu können.
Ziel des Forschungsvorhabens war es, durch gezielte Auswertung des Unfallgeschehens den Einfluss von Fahrerverhaltensweisen beziehungsweise -merkmalen und technischen Fahrzeugparametern auf die Unfallhäufigkeit und die Unfallart zu ermitteln. Zunächst wurde eine Auswertung der Literatur und die Beschaffung und Aufbereitung des Datenmaterials vorgenommen. Die Grundlage der Auswertungen bildeten die Unfälle mit Pkw-Beteiligung im Bundesland Nordrhein-Westfalen aus dem Jahre 1980. Die Datensätze waren vom Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt in Flensburg um fahrzeugtechnische Angaben erweitert worden. Zur Relativierung der Unfallzahlen wurden fahrzeugtypenspezifische jährliche Fahrleistungen und Bestände berechnet. Weiterhin wurde das Geschwindigkeitsverhalten im freien Verkehr in Abhängigkeit vom Fahreralter sowie vom Fahrzeugtyp ermittelt. Um die Wechselwirkungen von Fahrer- und Fahrzeugeigenschaften im Unfallgeschehen unabhängig voneinander betrachten zu können, war es notwendig, einen "Normalfahrer" zu definieren. Der "Normalfahrer" wurde anhand von Analysen ausgewählter Unfallsituationen mit dem Ziel beschrieben, mit diesen Fahrern Fahrversuche mit Pkw durchführen zu können, deren Ergebnisse weder durch besonders gute noch durch besonders schlechte, sondern vielmehr durch eine durchschnittliche Eignung des Fahrers zum Führen eines Kraftfahrzeuges geprägt sein sollen. Anhand dieser Fahrversuche sollen Grenzen von Kennwerten, die Fahrzeugeigenschaften und das Fahrverhalten beschreiben, abgeleitet werden, die sich als dem "Normalfahrer" angepasst erweisen. Aufgrund der aufgezeigten Zusammenhänge zwischen dem Fahreralter und der ursächlichen Beteiligung an bestimmten Unfalltypen ist es nunmehr möglich, durchschnittlich gute Fahrer als Probanden auszuwählen, die je nach Art des Versuches entweder zur Gruppe der jüngeren und älteren Fahrer gehören. Nach vorheriger Festlegung eines Anteilswertes von Fahrern, die als "normal" anzusehen sind, können bei gleichzeitiger Berücksichtigung der für jüngere und ältere Fahrer typischen Versagensarten die Altersintervalle bestimmt werden, aus denen die "Normalfahrer" für die Fahrversuche auszuwählen sind.
Beschrieben wird die Evaluierung eines Testverfahrens der Arbeitsgruppe 10 des European Experimental Vehicle Committee, mit dem die "Fußgängerverträglichkeit" von Frontflächen von Personenkraftwagen bestimmt werden kann. Dabei werden verschiedene Anprallarten von Fußgängern an Fahrzeugen simuliert: der Anprall eines Beines an den Stoßfänger, der Anprall des Oberschenkels an die Vorderkante der Fronthaube und der Anprall des Kopfes auf die Fronthaube. Im Beitrag wird auf die Durchführung von Tests zum Oberschenkelanprall und zum Beinanprall an drei verschiedenen Fahrzeugtypen eingegangen. Beschrieben werden Testverfahren, Versuchsaufbau und Versuchsdurchführung. Die Versuchsreihe zeigte, dass das entwickelte Testverfahren praktikabel ist.
Thoracic injury is one of the predominant types of severe injuries in frontal accidents. The assessment of the injury risk to the thorax in the current frontal impact test procedures is based on the uni-axial chest deflection measured in the dummy Hybrid III. Several studies have shown that criteria based on the linear chest potentiometer are not sensitive enough to distinguish between different restraint systems, and cannot indicate asymmetric chest loading, which has been shown to correlate to increased injury risk. Furthermore, the measurement is sensitive to belt position on the dummy chest. The objective of this study was to evaluate the optical multipoint chest deflection measurement system "RibEye" in frontal impact sled tests. Therefore the sensitivity of the RibEyesystem to different restraint system parameters was investigated. Furthermore, the issue of signal drop out at the 6 th rib was investigated in this study.A series of sled tests were conducted with the RibEye system in the Hybrid III 50%. The sled environment consisted of a rigid seat and a standard production three-point seat belt system. Rib deflections were recorded with the RibEye system and additionally with the standard chest potentiometer. The tests were carried out at crash pulses of two different velocities (30 km/h and 64 km/h). The tests were conducted with different belt routing to investigate the sensitivity of chest deflection measurements to belt position on the dummy chest. Furthermore, different restraint system parameters were investigated (force limiter level, with or without pretensioning) to evaluate if the RibEye measurements provide additional information to distinguish between restraint system configurations . The results showed that with the RibEye system it was possible to identify the effect of belt routing in more detail. The chest deflections measured with the standard chest potentiometer as well as the maximum deflection measured by RibEye allowed the distinction to be made between different force limiter levels. The RibEye system was also able to clearly show the asymmetric deflection of the rib cage due to belt loading. In some configurations, differences of more than 15 mm were observed between the left and side areas of the chest. Furthermore, the abdomen insert was identified as source of the problem of signal drop out at the 6th rib. Possible solutions are discussed. In conclusion, the RibEye system provided valuable additional information regarding the assessment of restraint systems. It has the potential to enable the evaluation of thoracic injury risk due to asymmetric loading. Further investigations with the RibEye should be extended to tests in a vehicle environment, which include a vehicle seat and other restraint system components such as an airbag.
Evaluation of the performance of competitive headforms as test tools for interior headform testing
(2009)
The European Research Project APROSYS has evaluated the interior headform test procedure developed by EEVC WG 13, representing the head contact in the car during a lateral impact. One important aspect within this test procedure was the selection of an appropriate impactor. The WG13 procedure currently uses the Free Motion Headform as used within the FMVSS 201. The ACEA 3.5 kg headform used in Phase 1 of the European Directive and the future European Regulation on Pedestrian Protection is still discussed as a possible alternative. This paper reports work performed by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) as a part of the APROSYS Task 1.1.3. The study compares the two headform impactors according to FMVSS and ACEA, in a series of basic tests in order to evaluate their sensitivity towards different impact angles, impact accuracy, the effect of differences to impactors of the same type and the effects of the repeatability and reproducibility of the test results. The test surface consisted of a steel tube covered with PU foam and PVC, representing the car interior to be tested. Despite of the higher mass of the FMH the HIC values of this impactor were generally lower than those of the ACEA headform. The FMH showed a higher repeatability of test results but a high sensitivity on the angle of roll, the spherical ACEA impactor performed better with regards to the reproducibility. In case of the ACEA impactor-, the angle of roll had no influence.
The PDB, BASt and Opel conducted two test series to evaluate possible effects on the results obtained using the EEVC WG17 Lower Legform Impactor as a test tool for the assessment of pedestrian safety. The reproducibility and repeatability of the test results were assessed using six legform impactors while keeping the test parameters constant. In the second series one impactor was used and the test parameters were varied to assess the effects on the readings of the legform. The test parameters were velocity, temperature, relative humidity, the point of first contact regarding the deviation in z-direction and the deviations of the pitch, roll and yaw angle. The tests were performed using an inverse setup, i.e. the legform was hit by a guided linear impactor equipped with a honeycomb deformation element. This setup was chosen to be able to vary each single parameter while avoiding variations of the other test parameters at the same time. The test parameters were varied stronger than allowed in regulatory use in order to determine possible dependencies between the parameters and the readings which were acceleration, bending angle and shear displacement.
It is well known that most accidents with pedestrians are caused by the driver not being alert or misinterpreting the situation. For that reason advanced forward looking safety systems have a high potential to improve safety for this group of vulnerable road users. Active pedestrian protection systems combine reduction of impact speed by driver warning and/or autonomous braking with deployment of protective devices shortly before the imminent impact. According to the Euro NCAP roadmap the Autonomous Emergency Braking system tests for Pedestrians Protection will be set in force from 2016 onwards. Various projects and organisations in Europe are developing performance tests and assessment procedures as accompanying measures to the Euro NCAP initiative. To provide synthesised input to Euro NCAP so-called Harmonisation Platforms (HP-) have been established. Their main goal is to foster exchange of information on key subjects, thereby generating a clear overview of similarities and differences on the approaches chosen and, on that basis, recommend on future test procedures. In this paper activities of the Harmonisation Platform 2 on the development of Test Equipment are presented. For the testing targets that mimic humans different sensing technologies are required. A first set of specifications for pedestrian targets and the propulsion systems as collected by Harmonisation Platform 2 are presented together with a first evaluation for a number of available tools.