91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (133) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Sicherheit (58)
- Safety (57)
- Bewertung (40)
- Evaluation (assessment) (40)
- Vehicle (39)
- Fahrzeug (38)
- Anfahrversuch (34)
- Impact test (veh) (31)
- Conference (28)
- Test method (28)
- Versuch (27)
- Konferenz (26)
- Prüfverfahren (26)
- Test (26)
- Accident (22)
- Unfall (22)
- Fußgänger (20)
- Pedestrian (20)
- Anthropometric dummy (19)
- Deutschland (19)
- Germany (19)
- Car (18)
- Dummy (17)
- Collision (16)
- Pkw (16)
- Compatibility (15)
- Kompatibilität (15)
- Simulation (15)
- Driver assistance system (14)
- Method (14)
- Passive safety system (14)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (14)
- Verfahren (14)
- Zusammenstoß (14)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (13)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (13)
- Head on collision (13)
- Gesetzgebung (12)
- Legislation (12)
- Research project (12)
- Unfallverhütung (12)
- Accident prevention (11)
- Child (11)
- Forschungsarbeit (11)
- Kind (11)
- Analyse (math) (10)
- Analysis (math) (10)
- EU (10)
- Europa (10)
- Europe (10)
- Injury (10)
- Schlag (10)
- Shock (10)
- Verletzung (10)
- Autonomes Fahren (9)
- Autonomous driving (9)
- Driver (9)
- Driver information (9)
- Fahrer (9)
- Fahrerinformation (9)
- Fahrstabilität (9)
- Insasse (9)
- Lkw (9)
- Lorry (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (9)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (9)
- Vehicle handling (9)
- Vehicle occupant (9)
- Vehicle regulations (9)
- Active safety system (8)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (8)
- Automatic (8)
- Automatisch (8)
- Biomechanics (8)
- Biomechanik (8)
- Electronic driving aid (8)
- Elektronische Fahrhilfe (8)
- Improvement (8)
- Measurement (8)
- Messung (8)
- Motorcycle (8)
- Motorrad (8)
- Severity (accid (8)
- Severity (accid, injury) (8)
- Technologie (8)
- Technology (8)
- Verbesserung (8)
- injury) (8)
- Cyclist (7)
- Fahrzeugführung (7)
- Head (7)
- Kopf (7)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (7)
- Side impact (7)
- Standardisierung (7)
- Belastung (6)
- Bemessung (6)
- Braking (6)
- Bremsung (6)
- Design (overall design) (6)
- Driving (veh) (6)
- Impact test (6)
- Load (6)
- Prevention (6)
- Risiko (6)
- Safety belt (6)
- Sicherheitsgurt (6)
- Verletzung) (6)
- Alte Leute (5)
- Anti locking device (5)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (5)
- Ausrüstung (5)
- Benutzung (5)
- Communication (5)
- Deformation (5)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (5)
- Development (5)
- Entwicklung (5)
- Equipment (5)
- Ergonomics (5)
- Geschwindigkeit (5)
- Headlamp (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Kommunikation (5)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (5)
- Official approval (5)
- Reifen (5)
- Richtlinien (5)
- Risk (5)
- Scheinwerfer (5)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (5)
- Specifications (5)
- Speed (5)
- Standardization (5)
- Steering (process) (5)
- Tyre (5)
- Use (5)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (5)
- Accident rate (4)
- Aufprallschlitten (4)
- Bein (menschl) (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Collision avoidance system (4)
- Cost benefit analysis (4)
- Datenbank (4)
- Decrease (4)
- Driver training (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Ergonomie (4)
- Fahrausbildung (4)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (4)
- Fahrzeugsitz (4)
- Impact sled (4)
- Interior (veh) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Nacht (4)
- Night (4)
- Norm (tech) (4)
- Old people (4)
- Perception (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Road user (4)
- Seat (veh) (4)
- Sichtbarkeit (4)
- Specification (standard) (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (4)
- Verformung (4)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (4)
- Verminderung (4)
- Sichtbarkeit (4)
- Wahrnehmung (4)
- Airbag (3)
- Antikollisionssystem (3)
- Auffahrunfall (3)
- Bend (road) (3)
- Bicycle (3)
- Brake (3)
- Bremse (3)
- Bus (3)
- Database (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Error (3)
- Fahrleistung (3)
- Fahrrad (3)
- Fehler (3)
- Gewicht (3)
- Human body (3)
- Knie (menschl) (3)
- Kraftfahrzeug (3)
- Leuchtdichte (3)
- Luminance (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Messgerät (3)
- Modification (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Policy (3)
- Politik (3)
- Rear end collision (3)
- Reflectivity (3)
- Reflexionsgrad (3)
- Spikesreifen (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Statistik (3)
- Straßenkurve (3)
- Straßenverkehr (3)
- Studded tyre (3)
- Unterfahrschutz (3)
- Vehicle mile (3)
- Verhütung (3)
- Warning (3)
- Weight (3)
- Windschutzscheibe (3)
- Windscreen (veh) (3)
- Active safety (2)
- Adolescent (2)
- Age (2)
- Air bag (restraint system) (2)
- Aktive Sicherheit (2)
- Alter (2)
- Ankündigung (2)
- Apparatus (measuring) (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Baumusterzulassung (2)
- Bicyclist (2)
- Blendung (2)
- Body (car) (2)
- Braking distance (2)
- Bremsweg (2)
- Cause (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Data acquisition (2)
- Datenerfassung (2)
- Delivery vehicle (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Electric vehicle (2)
- Elektrofahrzeug (2)
- Empfindlichkeit (2)
- Fahranfänger (2)
- Fatality (2)
- Federung (2)
- Forschungsbericht (2)
- France (2)
- Frankreich (2)
- Glare (2)
- Griffigkeit (2)
- Highway traffic (2)
- Impact study (2)
- Individueller Verkehr (2)
- Industrie (2)
- Industry (2)
- International (2)
- Jugendlicher (2)
- Karosserie (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Kunststoff (2)
- Landstraße (2)
- Mathematical model (2)
- Nummer (2)
- Plastic material (2)
- Private transport (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Prüfstand (2)
- Rear view mirror (2)
- Recently qualified driver (2)
- Rechenmodell (2)
- Reconstruction (accid) (2)
- Reflectorized material (2)
- Reflexstoffe (2)
- Road network (2)
- Rural road (2)
- Rückspiegel (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Sensitivity (2)
- Sensor (2)
- Skidding resistance (2)
- Straßennetz (2)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (2)
- Suspension (veh) (2)
- Test rig (2)
- Traffic count (2)
- Transport (2)
- Tödlicher Unfall (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vehicle inspection (2)
- Verkehrserhebung (2)
- Versuchspuppe (2)
- Veränderung (2)
- Visual display (2)
- Zahl (2)
- Zulassung (tech) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- Abdomen (1)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (1)
- Acceleration (1)
- Accident data (1)
- Accident proneness (1)
- Accompanied driving (1)
- Adaptive cruise control (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anhänger (1)
- Anti blocking device (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Attention (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Axle (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Baustoff (1)
- Begleitetes Fahren (1)
- Begrenzungsleuchten (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Benefit cost analysis (1)
- Berechnung (1)
- Beschleunigung (1)
- Betriebsverhalten (1)
- Bibliographie (1)
- Bibliography (1)
- Bildschirm (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Bonnet (car) (1)
- Brake light (1)
- Bremslicht (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Bumper (1)
- Calculation (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Carriageway (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Coefficient of friction (1)
- Colour (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Components of the car (1)
- Compression (1)
- Construction (1)
- Contact (tyre road) (1)
- Control (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crash helmet (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Cycle car (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Data security (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Daytime running light (1)
- Deceleration (1)
- Decke (Straße) (1)
- Deckschicht (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Demand (econ) (1)
- Demographie (1)
- Deutschland ; Konferenz (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Dimension (1)
- Disabled person (1)
- Distribution (gen) (1)
- Driver experience (1)
- Driving aptitude (1)
- Durability (1)
- Durchsichtigkeit (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emission (1)
- Emission control (1)
- Emissionskontrolle (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Environment (1)
- Environment protection (1)
- Erfahrung (menschl) (1)
- Erste Hilfe (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Experience (human) (1)
- Experimental road (1)
- Expert system (1)
- Expertensystem (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahn (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrbare Barriere (1)
- Fahrstreifen (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrtauglichkeit (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugabstand (1)
- Fahrzeugachse (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Fahrzeugteile (1)
- Failure (1)
- Farbe (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- First aid (1)
- Force (1)
- Form (1)
- Four wheel drive (1)
- Fracht (1)
- Frau (1)
- Freight (1)
- Front (1)
- Fuel consumption (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Gebiet (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Gestaltung (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Gussasphalt (1)
- Haftung (jur) (1)
- Halogen (1)
- Halogene (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Hazard (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Hell (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- In service behaviour (1)
- In situ (1)
- Intelligent transport system (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Interview (1)
- Italien (1)
- Italy (1)
- Itinerary (1)
- Japan (1)
- Kamera (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Kleinwagen (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kraft (1)
- Kraftstoffverbrauch (1)
- Körperstellung (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Layout (1)
- Liability (1)
- Lichtstärke (1)
- Lieferfahrzeug (1)
- Light (colour) (1)
- Light intensity (1)
- Limit (1)
- Location (1)
- Lochstreifen (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Material (constr) (1)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Mobile barrier (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Mobilität (1)
- Motorhaube (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nachfrage (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Naturalistic Driving (1)
- Naturalistic driving (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Oberfläche (1)
- On the spot accident investigation (1)
- Optimum (1)
- Optische Anzeige (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Overturning (veh) (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Population (1)
- Posture (1)
- Properties (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public relations (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Punched tape (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radial (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Rear (1)
- Region (1)
- Reibungsbeiwert (1)
- Reiseweg (1)
- Research report (1)
- Retread tyre (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road (1)
- Road traffic (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rolling resistance (1)
- Rollwiderstand (1)
- Runderneuerter Reifen (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Saftey (1)
- Sample (stat) (1)
- Schall (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schutzhelm (1)
- Schweregrad (unfall (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Schwingung (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Side (1)
- Side light (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Sound (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Stability (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- Standfestigkeit (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steuerung (1)
- Stichprobe (1)
- Stoßstange (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Surface (1)
- Surfacing (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Tagesfahrlicht (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (1)
- Technische Überwachung (1)
- Technische Überwachung (Fahrzeug) (1)
- Teenage driver (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Temperatur (1)
- Temperature (1)
- Tests (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic lanes (1)
- Traffic motivation (1)
- Traffic regulation (1)
- Traffic regulations (1)
- Traffic sign (1)
- Traffic survey (1)
- Trailer (1)
- Train (1)
- Transparent (1)
- Transport infrastructure (1)
- Trend (stat) (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- USA (1)
- Umwelt (1)
- Umweltschutz (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfalldaten (1)
- Unfallneigung (1)
- Unfallverhuetung (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Unterleib (1)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle Regulations (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle spacing (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (1)
- Verkehrsmotivation (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Verkehrsuntersuchung (1)
- Verkehrszeichen (1)
- Versuchsstrecke (1)
- Verteilung (allg) (1)
- Verzögerung (1)
- Vibration (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Vierradantrieb (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Warnung (1)
- Wearing course (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- verletzung) (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
- Überschlagen (1)
The levels of continuous vehicle automation have become common knowledge. They facilitate overall understanding of the issue. Yet, continuous vehicle automation described therein does not cover "automated driving" as a whole: Functions intervening temporarily in accident-prone situations can obviously not be classified by means of continuous levels. Continuous automation describes the shift in workload from purely human driven vehicles to full automation. Duties of the driver are assigned to the machine as automation levels rise. Emergency braking, e.g., is obviously discontinuous and intensive automation. It cannot be classified under this regime. The resulting absence of visibility of these important functions cannot satisfy " especially in the light of effect they take on traffic safety. Therefore, in order to reach a full picture of vehicle automation, a comprehensive approach is proposed that can map out different characteristics as "Principle of Operation" at top level. On this basis informing and warning functions as well as functions intervening only temporarily in near-accident situations can be described. To reach a complete picture, levels for the discontinuous, temporarily intervening functions are proposed " meant to be the counterpart of the continuous levels already in place. This results in a detailed and independent classification for accident-prone situations. This finally provides for the visibility these important functions deserve.
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection based on developments by the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) have been introduced in world-wide regulations and consumer test programmes, with considerable harmonization between these programmes. Nevertheless, latest accident investigations reveal a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads running the risk of not meeting the European Union- goal of halving the number of road fatalities by the year 2020. The branch of external road user safety within the EC-funded research project SENIORS under the HORIZON 2020 framework programme focuses on investigating the benefit of modifications to pedestrian test and assessment procedures and their impactors for vulnerable road users with focus on the elderly. Injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists derived from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) show a trend of AIS 2+ and AIS 3+ injuries getting more relevant for the thorax region in crashes with newer cars (Wisch et al., 2017), while maintaining the relevance for head and lower extremities. Several crash databases from Europe such as GIDAS and the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition (STRADA) also show that head, thorax and lower extremities are the key affected body regions not only for the average population but in particular for the elderly. Therefore, the SENIORS project is focusing on an improvement of currently available impactors and procedures in terms of biofidelity and injury assessment ability towards a better protection of the affected body regions, incorporating previous results from FP 6 project APROSYS and subsequent studies carried out by BASt. The paper describes the overall methodology to develop revised FE impactor models. Matched human body model and impactor simulations against generic test rigs provide transfer functions that will be used for the derivation of impactor criteria from human injury risk functions for the affected body regions. In a later step, the refined impactors will be validated by simulations against actual vehicle front-ends. Prototyping and adaptation of test and assessment procedures as well as an impact assessment will conclude the work of the project at the final stage. The work will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users focusing on the elderly. The use of advanced human body models to develop applicable assessment criteria for the revised impactors is intended to cope with the paucity of actual biomechanical data focusing on elderly pedestrians. In order to achieve optimized results in the future, the improved test methods need to be implemented within an integrated approach, combining active with passive safety measures. In order to address the developments in road accidents and injury patterns of vulnerable road users, established test and assessment procedures need to be continuously verified and, where needed, to be revised. The demographic change as well as changes in the vehicle fleet, leading to a variation of accident scenarios, injury frequencies and injury patterns of vulnerable road users are addressed by the work provided by the SENIORS project, introducing updated impactors for pedestrian test and assessment procedures.
Supported by field accident data and monitoring results of European Regulation (EC) No. 78/2009, recent plans of the European Commission regarding a way forward to improve passive safety of vulnerable road users include, amongst other things, an extension of the head test area. The inclusion of passive cyclist safety is also being considered by Euro NCAP. Although passenger car to cyclist collisions are often severe and have a significant share within the accident statistics, cyclists are neither considered sufficiently in the legislative nor in the consumer ratings tests. Therefore, a test procedure to assess the protection potential of vehicle fronts in a collision with cyclists has been developed within a current research project. For this purpose, the existing pedestrian head impact test procedures were modified in order to include boundary conditions relevant for cyclists as the second big group of vulnerable road users. Based on an in-depth analysis of passenger car to cyclist accidents in Germany the three most representative accident constellations have been initially defined. The development of the test procedure itself was based on corresponding simulations with representative vehicle and bicycle models. In addition to different cyclist heights, reaching from a 6-year-old child to a 95%-male, also four pedal positions were considered. By reconstruction of a real accident the defined simulation parameters could be validated in advance. The conducted accident kinematics analysis shows for a large portion of the constellations an increased head impact area, which can reach beyond the roof leading edge, as well as high average values for head impact velocity and angle. Based on the simulation data obtained for the different vehicle models, cyclist-specific test parameters for impactor tests have been derived, which have been further examined in the course of head and leg impact tests. In order to study the cyclist accident kinematics under real test conditions, different full scale tests with a Polar-II dummy positioned on a bicycle have been conducted. Overall, the tests showed a good correlation with the simulations and support the defined boundary test conditions. Typical accident scenarios and simulations reveal higher head impact locations, angles and velocities. An extended head impact area with modified test parameters will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users including cyclists. However, due to significantly differing impact kinematics and postures between the lower extremities of pedestrians and cyclists, these injuries cannot be addressed by the means of current test tools such as the flexible pedestrian legform impactor FlexPLI. Based on the findings obtained within the project as well as the existing pedestrian protection requirements a cyclist protection test procedure for use in legislation and consumer test programmes has been developed, whose requirements have been transferred into a corresponding test specification. This specification provides common head test boundary conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, whereby the existing requirements are modified and two parallel test procedures are avoided.
Established in 1997, the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) provides consumers with a safety performance assessment for the majority of the most popular cars in Europe. Thanks to its rigorous crash tests, Euro NCAP has rapidly become an important driver safety improvement to new cars. After ten years of rating vehicles, Euro NCAP felt that a change was necessary to stay in tune with rapidly emerging driver assistance and crash avoidance systems and to respond to shifting priorities in road safety. A new overall rating system was introduced that combines the most important aspects of vehicle safety under a single star rating. The overall rating system has allowed Euro NCAP to continue to push for better fitment and higher performance for vehicles sold on the European market. In the coming years, the safety rating is expected to play an important role in the support of the roll-out of highly automated vehicles.
Motorcycling is a fascinating kind of transportation. While the riders' direct exposure to the environment and the unique driving dynamics are essential to this fascination, they both cause a risk potential which is several times higher than when driving a car. This chapter gives a detailed introduction to the fundamentals of motorcycle dynamics and shows how its peculiarities and limitations place high demands on the layout of dynamics control systems, especially when cornering. The basic principles of dynamic stabilization and directional control are addressed along with four characteristic modes of instability (capsize, wobble, weave, and kickback). Special attention is given to the challenges of braking (brake force distribution, dynamic over-braking, kinematic instability, and brake steer torque induced righting behavior). It is explained how these challenges are addressed by state-of-the-art brake, traction, and suspension control systems in terms of system layout and principles of function. It is illustrated how the integration of additional sensors " essentially roll angle assessment " enhances the cornering performance in all three categories, fostering a trend to higher system integration levels. An outlook on potential future control systems shows exemplarily how the undesired righting behavior when braking in curves can be controlled, e.g., by means of a so-called brake steer torque avoidance mechanism (BSTAM), forming the basis for predictive brake assist (PBA) or even autonomous emergency braking (AEB). Finally, the very limited potential of brake and chassis control to stabilize yaw and roll motion during unbraked cornering accidents is regarded, closing with a promising glance at roll stabilization through a pair of gimbaled gyroscopes.
Automated driving will provide many kinds of benefits - some direct and some indirect. The benefits originate at the individual level, from changes in the behaviour of drivers and travellers with regard to driving and mobility, ending up with benefits at the social level via changes in the whole transport system and society, where many of the current planning and operations paradigms are likely to be transformed by automated driving. There may also be disbenefits, particularly at a social level, for example in intensity of travel which could result in additional congestion and increased use of natural resources. There may also be unintended consequences. For example, we do not know the impacts on public transport: driverless vehicles could provide a means to a lower cost service provision, but the availability of automated cars could lead to more car travel at the expense of collective transport.
The goal of the project FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) was to define an integrated set of test procedures and associated metrics to assess a vehicle's frontal impact protection, which includes self- and partner-protection. For the development of the set, two different full-width tests (full-width deformable barrier [FWDB] test, full-width rigid barrier test) and three different offset tests (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test, progressive deformable barrier [PDB] test, moveable deformable barrier with the PDB barrier face [MPDB] test) have been investigated. Different compatibility assessment procedures were analysed and metrics for assessing structural interaction (structural alignment, vertical and horizontal load spreading) as well as several promising metrics for the PDB/MPDB barrier were developed. The final assessment approach consists of a combination of the most suitable full-width and offset tests. For the full-width test (FWDB), a metric was developed to address structural alignment based on load cell wall information in the first 40 ms of the test. For the offset test (ODB), the existing ECE R94 was chosen. Within the paper, an overview of the final assessment approach for the frontal impact test procedures and their development is given.
The market introduction and penetration of electric vehicles can be seen as a milestone in order to reduce the environmental burden imposed by the transport sector. The wide-spread use of electric vehicles powered by electricity from renewable sources promises a substantial reduction of local emissions in urban areas as well as greenhouse gas emissions. To be a successful mobility alternative several obstacles and challenges have to be overcome first. Especially the customers' purchase decision determines finally whether an innovation like electromobility will be successful. Therefore, this paper concentrates on demand-related obstacles and barriers for a broad market deployment of electric cars. Within the Electromobility+ project eMAP these issues are investigated via a consumer survey. It was designed to identify the awareness of potential consumers of electric cars as well as give an estimate of the attitude towards this new technology. In addition to the picture of potential demand-related obstacles the consumers were asked to evaluate the suitability of various promotion measures.
The off-set assessment procedure potentially contributes to the FIMCAR objectives to maintain the compartment strength and to assess load spreading in frontal collisions. Furthermore it provides the opportunity to assess the restraint system performance with different pulses if combined with a full-width assessment procedure in the frontal assessment approach. Originally it was expected that the PDB assessment procedure would be selected for the FIMCAR assessment approach. However, it was not possible to deliver a compatibility metric in time so that the current off-set procedure (ODB as used in UNECE R94) with some minor modifications was proposed for the FIMCAR Assessment Approach. Nevertheless the potential to assess load spreading, which appears not to be possible with any other assessed frontal impact assessment procedure was considered to be still high. Therefore the development work for the PDB assessment procedure did not stop with the decision not to select the PDB procedure. As a result of the decisions to use the current ODB and to further develop the PDB procedure, both are covered within this deliverable. The deliverable describes the off-set test procedure that will be recommended by FIMCAR consortium, this corresponds to the ODB test as it is specified in UN-ECE Regulation 94 (R94), i.e. EEVC deformable element with 40% overlap at a test speed of 56 km/h. In addition to the current R94 requirements, FIMCAR will recommend to introduce some structural requirements which will guarantee sufficiently strong occupant compartments by enforcing the stability of the forward occupant cell. With respect to the PDB assessment procedure a new metric, Digital Derivative in Y direction - DDY, was developed, described, analysed, and compared with other metrics. The DDY metric analyses the deformation gradients laterally across the PDB face. The more even the deformation, the lower the DDY values and the better the metric- result. In order analyse the different metrics, analysis of the existing PDB test results and the results of the performed simulation studies was performed. In addition, an assessment of artificial deformation profiles with the metrics took place. This analysis shows that there are still issues with the DDY metric but it appears that it is possible to solve them with future optimisations. For example the current metric assesses only the area within 60% of the half vehicle width. For vehicles that have the longitudinals further outboard, the metric is not effective. In addition to the metric development, practical issues of the PDB tests such as the definition of a scan procedure for the analysis of the deformation pattern including the validation of the scanning procedure by the analysis of 3 different scans at different locations of the same barrier were addressed. Furthermore the repeatability and reproducibility of the PDB was analysed. The barrier deformation readings seem to be sensitive with respect to the impact accuracy. In total, the deliverable is meant to define the FIMCAR off-set assessment procedure and to be a starting point for further development of the PDB assessment procedure.
The objective of this deliverable is to describe the expected influence of the candidate test procedures developed in FIMCAR for frontal impact on other impact types. The other impact types of primary interest are front-to-side impacts, collisions with road restraint systems (e.g. guardrails), and heavy goods vehicle impacts. These collision types were chosen as they involve structures that can be adapted to improve safety. Collisions with vulnerable road users (VRU) were not explicitly investigated in FIMCAR. It is expected that the vehicle structures of interest in FIMCAR can be designed into a VRU friendly shell. Information used for this deliverable comes from simulations and car-to-car crash tests conducted in FIMCAR or review of previous research. Three test configurations (full width, offset, and moving deformable barriers) were the input to the FIMCAR selection process. There are three different types of offset tests and two different full width tests. During the project test procedures could be divided into three groups that provide different influences or outcomes on vehicle designs: 1. The ODB barrier provides a method to assess part of the vehicles energy absorption capabilities and compartment test in one test. 2. The FWRB and FWDB have similar capabilities to control structural alignment, further assess energy absorption capabilities, and promote the improvements in the occupant restraint system for high deceleration impacts. 3. The PDB and MPDB can be used to promote better load spreading in the vehicle structures, in addition to assessing energy absorption and occupant compartment strength in an offset configuration. The consortium selected the ODB and FWDB as the two best candidates for short term application in international rulemaking. The review of how all candidates would affect vehicle performance in other impacts (beside front-to-front vehicle or frontal impacts with fixed obstacles) however is reported in this deliverable to support the benefit analysis reported in FIMCAR. The grouping presented above is used to discuss all five test candidates using similarities between certain tests and thereby simplify the discussion.
The objectives of the FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) project are to answer the remaining open questions identified in earlier projects (such as understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of force based metrics and barrier deformation based metrics, confirmation of specific compatibility issues such as structural interaction, investigation of force matching) and to finalise the frontal impact test procedures required to assess compatibility. Research strategies and priorities were based on earlier research programs and the FIMCAR accident data analysis. The identified real world safety issues were used to develop a list of compatibility characteristics which were then prioritised within the consortium. This list was the basis for evaluating the different test candidates. This analysis resulted in the combination of the Full Width Deformable Barrier test (FWDB) with compatibility metrics and the existing Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) as described in UN-ECE Regulation 94 with additional cabin integrity requirement as being proposed as the FIMCAR assessment approach. The proposed frontal impact assessment approach addresses many of the issues identified by the FIMCAR consortium but not all frontal impact and compatibility issues could be addressed.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were to review existing full-width test procedures and their discussed compatibility metrics, to report recent activities and findings with respect to full-width assessment procedures and to assess test procedures and metrics. Starting with a review of previous work, candidate metrics and associated performance limits to assess a vehicle- structural interaction potential, in particular its structural alignment, have been developed for both the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB) and Full Width Rigid Barrier (FWRB) tests. Initial work was performed to develop a concept to assess a vehicle- frontal force matching. However, based on the accident analyses performed within FIMCAR frontal force matching was not evaluated as a first priority and thus in line with FIMCAR strategy the focus was put on the development of metrics for the assessment of structural interaction which was evaluated as a first priority.
Accident analysis
(2014)
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the EC funded FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in today- research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The specific objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were: - Determine if previously identified compatibility issues are still relevant in current vehicle fleet: Structural interaction, Frontal force matching, Compartment strength in particular for light cars. - Determine nature of injuries and injury mechanisms: Body regions injured o Injury mechanism: Contact with intrusion, Contact, Deceleration / restraint induced. The main data sources for this report were the CCIS and Stats 19 databases from Great Britain and the GIDAS database from Germany. The different sampling and reporting schemes for the detailed databases (CCIS & GIDAS) sometimes do not allow for direct comparisons of the results. However the databases are complementary " CCIS captures more severe collisions highlighting structure and injury issues while GIDAS provides detailed data for a broader range of crash severities. The following results represent the critical points for further development of test procedures in FIMCAR.
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and the final report to the steering committee on frontal impact [Faerber 2007] and the FP5 VC-COMPAT[Edwards 2007] project activities, two test approaches were identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis will be performed. In the FIMCAR Deliverable D 3.1 [Adolph 2013] the development and assessment of criteria and associated performance limits for the full width test procedure were reported. In this Deliverable D3.2 analyses of the test data (full width tests, car-to-car tests and component tests), further development and validation of the full width assessment protocol and development of the load cell and load cell wall specification are reported. The FIMCAR full-width assessment procedure consists of a 50 km/h test against the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB). The Load Cell Wall behind the deformable element assesses whether or not important Energy Absorbing Structures are within the Common Interaction Zone as defined based on the US part 581 zone. The metric evaluates the row forces and requires that the forces directly above and below the centre line of the Common Interaction Zone exceed a minimum threshold. Analysis of the load spreading showed that metrics that rely on sum forces of rows and columns are within acceptable tolerances. Furthermore it was concluded that the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the FWDB test is acceptable. The FWDB test was shown to be capable to detect lower load paths that are beneficial in car-to-car impacts.
In the European Project FIMCAR, a proposal for a frontal impact test configuration was developed which included an additional full width deformable barrier (FWDB) test. Motivation for the deformable element was partly to measure structural forces as well as to produce a severe crash pulse different from that in the offset test. The objective of this study was to analyze the safety performance of vehicles in the full width rigid barrier test (FWRB) and in the full width deformable barrier test (FWDB). In total, 12 vehicles were crashed in both configurations. Comparison of these tests to real world accident data was used to identify the crash barrier most representative of real world crashes. For all vehicles, the airbag visible times were later in the FWDB configuration. This was attributed to the attenuation of the initial acceleration peak, observed in FWRB tests, by the addition of the deformable element. These findings were in alignment with airbag triggering times seen in real world crash data. Also, the dummy loadings were slightly worse in FWDB compared to FWRB tests, which is possibly linked to the airbag firing and a more realistic loading of the vehicle crash structures in the FWDB configuration. Evaluations of the lower extremities have shown a general increasing of the tibia index with the crash pulse severity.
In 2012 the fifth ESAR conference (Expert Symposium on Accident Research) was held in Hannover. ESAR is an international convention of experts, who analyze traffic accidents all over the world and discuss their results in this context, conducted at the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover every 2 years. It connected representatives of public authorities, engineers in automotive development and scientists and offers a forum with particular emphasis on In-Depth-Analyses of accident statistics and accident analyses. Special focus is placed on research on the basis of so-called "In-Depth-Accident-Investigations" [data collections at the sites of the accidents], which are characterized by extensive documentations of the sites of the accidents, of the vehicles as well as of the injuries, encompassing several scientific fields. ESAR aims at a multi-disciplinary compilation of scientific results and at discussing them on an international, scientific level. It is thus a scientific colloquium and a platform for exchanging information for all accident researchers. Experiences in accident prevention as well as in the complex field of accident reconstruction are stated and new research fields are added. Existing results of long-term research work in Europe, the US, Australia and Japan include different infrastructural correlations and give findings on population, vehicle population and driver characteristics, which offer a basis for recommendations to be derived and measures for increasing road safety.
To improve vehicle safety in frontal collisions, the crash compatibility between the colliding vehicles is crucial. Compatibility aims to improve both the self and partner protection properties of vehicles. Although compatibility has received worldwide attention for many years, no final assessment approach has been defined. Within the Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research (FIMCAR) project, different frontal impact test procedures (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test as currently used for Economic Commission for Europe [ECE] R94, progressive deformable barrier test as proposed by France for a new ECE regulation, moveable deformable barrier test as discussed worldwide, full-width rigid barrier test as used in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard [FMVSS] 208, and full-width deformable barrier test) were analyzed regarding their potential for future frontal impact legislation. The research activities focused on car-to-car frontal impact accidents based on accident investigations involving newer cars. Test procedures were developed with both a crash test program and numerical simulations. The proposal from FIMCAR is to use a full-width test procedure with a deformable element and compatibility metrics in combination with the current offset test as a frontal impact assessment approach that also addresses compatibility. By adding a full-width test to the current ODB test it is possible to better address the issues of structural misalignment and injuries resulting from high acceleration accidents as observed in the current fleet. The estimated benefit ranges from a 5 to 12 percent reduction of fatalities and serious injuries resulting from frontal impact accidents. By using a deformable element in the full-width test, the test conditions are more representative of real-world situations with respect to acceleration pulse, restraint system triggering time, and deformation pattern of the front structure. The test results are therefore expected to better represent real-world performance of the tested car. Furthermore, the assessment of the structural alignment is more robust than in the rigid wall test.
Das Ziel der Untersuchung war, die Grenzen der Belastbarkeit eines Rollstuhl- und Personenrückhaltesystems mit Kraftknoten nach DIN 75078-2 zu ermitteln. Dazu wurden dynamische Schlittenversuche durchgeführt, bei denen die Verzögerungspulse sowie das Gesamtgewicht von Rollstuhl und Prüfpuppe variiert wurden. Für die Untersuchungen kamen ein Prüfrollstuhl, definiert nach ISO 10542, und Rückhaltesysteme mit Kraftknoten gemäß DIN 75078-2 zum Einsatz. Das Rückhaltesystem bestand aus einem Rollstuhl- und einem Personenrückhaltesystem, wobei das Rollstuhlrückhaltesystem (RRS) mit vier bzw. sechs Gurten und entsprechenden Retraktoren an einem dynamischen Schlittenaufbau befestigt wurde. Das Personenrückhaltesystem (PRS) bestand aus einem am Rollstuhl integrierten Beckengurt sowie einem Schulterschräggurt, der am Beckengurt und am Schlittenaufbau befestigt wurde. Ferner wurden bei den Versuchen Prüfpuppen verschiedener Alters- und Gewichtsklassen (P6, HIII 5 %, HIII 50 % und HIII 95 %) eingesetzt Die Belastungsanforderungen für das Rückhaltesystem wurden sukzessiv erweitert, indem einerseits das Gesamtgewicht (Rollstuhl und Prüfpuppe) und andererseits auch die Verzögerungspulse bis zur Versagensgrenze erhöht wurden. Das Vier-Gurt-Rückhaltesystem konnte bei einem Verzögerungspuls von 10 g einem Gesamtgewicht von bis zu 221 kg standhalten. Bei einem Verzögerungspuls von 20 g und einem Gesamtgewicht von 134 kg wurde das Vier-Gurt-System bis über die Grenzen belastet. Das Sechs-Gurt-Rückhaltesystem hat Belastungen bis 221 kg standgehalten. Infolgedessen ist bei einer Erhöhung der Verzögerungspulse auf 20 g und einem Gesamtgewicht von mehr als 109 kg ein Sechs-Gurt-System zu empfehlen.
Although the bus belongs to the safest traffic means, single accidents can be particularly severe and concern many passengers. Especially in case of fires a high number of injured and killed persons can be the outcome. Fire safety of buses therefore is of high importance. With the increase of synthetic and plastic materials as a material for the interior equipment of buses and coaches because of their ood mechanical properties combined with low weight, the question arises whether the safety level has decreased in case of a fire during the last years - also compared to other means of transport. Because of the combustible plastics and their ability to release a high amount of heat the main fire load in buses is no longer the fuel but the plastic materials which are also often easy to ignite. Besides the flammability of the equipments, the production of smoke, the smoke development and propagation and its toxicity for the people as well as the testing methods and limit values are of interest. For those reasons research projects were initiated on behalf of the German Federal Highway Research Institute. At the one hand the fire behavior of coach interiors was examined in general focusing on fire propagation as well as fire detection and signalling. As result, recommendations with regard to early fire detection systems for the engine compartments and on-board extinguishing equipment were elaborated. At the other hand research is carried out to examine heat release, smoke, smoke propagation and its toxicity due to burning bus interior materials. The paper describes which effective and economically reasonable fire safety requirements for interiors of buses would improve the current situation. Proposals for amendments of current requirements are recommended including the specification of appropriate limit values. In particular, it is taken into consideration which reasonable fire safety standards from other transport sectors, especially the rail sector, should be transferred to buses.