91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (133) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Sicherheit (58)
- Safety (57)
- Bewertung (40)
- Evaluation (assessment) (40)
- Vehicle (39)
- Fahrzeug (38)
- Anfahrversuch (34)
- Impact test (veh) (31)
- Conference (28)
- Test method (28)
- Versuch (27)
- Konferenz (26)
- Prüfverfahren (26)
- Test (26)
- Accident (22)
- Unfall (22)
- Fußgänger (20)
- Pedestrian (20)
- Anthropometric dummy (19)
- Deutschland (19)
- Germany (19)
- Car (18)
- Dummy (17)
- Collision (16)
- Pkw (16)
- Compatibility (15)
- Kompatibilität (15)
- Simulation (15)
- Driver assistance system (14)
- Method (14)
- Passive safety system (14)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (14)
- Verfahren (14)
- Zusammenstoß (14)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (13)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (13)
- Head on collision (13)
- Gesetzgebung (12)
- Legislation (12)
- Research project (12)
- Unfallverhütung (12)
- Accident prevention (11)
- Child (11)
- Forschungsarbeit (11)
- Kind (11)
- Analyse (math) (10)
- Analysis (math) (10)
- EU (10)
- Europa (10)
- Europe (10)
- Injury (10)
- Schlag (10)
- Shock (10)
- Verletzung (10)
- Autonomes Fahren (9)
- Autonomous driving (9)
- Driver (9)
- Driver information (9)
- Fahrer (9)
- Fahrerinformation (9)
- Fahrstabilität (9)
- Insasse (9)
- Lkw (9)
- Lorry (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (9)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (9)
- Vehicle handling (9)
- Vehicle occupant (9)
- Vehicle regulations (9)
- Active safety system (8)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (8)
- Automatic (8)
- Automatisch (8)
- Biomechanics (8)
- Biomechanik (8)
- Electronic driving aid (8)
- Elektronische Fahrhilfe (8)
- Improvement (8)
- Measurement (8)
- Messung (8)
- Motorcycle (8)
- Motorrad (8)
- Severity (accid (8)
- Severity (accid, injury) (8)
- Technologie (8)
- Technology (8)
- Verbesserung (8)
- injury) (8)
- Cyclist (7)
- Fahrzeugführung (7)
- Head (7)
- Kopf (7)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (7)
- Side impact (7)
- Standardisierung (7)
- Belastung (6)
- Bemessung (6)
- Braking (6)
- Bremsung (6)
- Design (overall design) (6)
- Driving (veh) (6)
- Impact test (6)
- Load (6)
- Prevention (6)
- Risiko (6)
- Safety belt (6)
- Sicherheitsgurt (6)
- Verletzung) (6)
- Alte Leute (5)
- Anti locking device (5)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (5)
- Ausrüstung (5)
- Benutzung (5)
- Communication (5)
- Deformation (5)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (5)
- Development (5)
- Entwicklung (5)
- Equipment (5)
- Ergonomics (5)
- Geschwindigkeit (5)
- Headlamp (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Kommunikation (5)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (5)
- Official approval (5)
- Reifen (5)
- Richtlinien (5)
- Risk (5)
- Scheinwerfer (5)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (5)
- Specifications (5)
- Speed (5)
- Standardization (5)
- Steering (process) (5)
- Tyre (5)
- Use (5)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (5)
- Accident rate (4)
- Aufprallschlitten (4)
- Bein (menschl) (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Collision avoidance system (4)
- Cost benefit analysis (4)
- Datenbank (4)
- Decrease (4)
- Driver training (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Ergonomie (4)
- Fahrausbildung (4)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (4)
- Fahrzeugsitz (4)
- Impact sled (4)
- Interior (veh) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Nacht (4)
- Night (4)
- Norm (tech) (4)
- Old people (4)
- Perception (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Road user (4)
- Seat (veh) (4)
- Sichtbarkeit (4)
- Specification (standard) (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (4)
- Verformung (4)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (4)
- Verminderung (4)
- Sichtbarkeit (4)
- Wahrnehmung (4)
- Airbag (3)
- Antikollisionssystem (3)
- Auffahrunfall (3)
- Bend (road) (3)
- Bicycle (3)
- Brake (3)
- Bremse (3)
- Bus (3)
- Database (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Error (3)
- Fahrleistung (3)
- Fahrrad (3)
- Fehler (3)
- Gewicht (3)
- Human body (3)
- Knie (menschl) (3)
- Kraftfahrzeug (3)
- Leuchtdichte (3)
- Luminance (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Messgerät (3)
- Modification (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Policy (3)
- Politik (3)
- Rear end collision (3)
- Reflectivity (3)
- Reflexionsgrad (3)
- Spikesreifen (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Statistik (3)
- Straßenkurve (3)
- Straßenverkehr (3)
- Studded tyre (3)
- Unterfahrschutz (3)
- Vehicle mile (3)
- Verhütung (3)
- Warning (3)
- Weight (3)
- Windschutzscheibe (3)
- Windscreen (veh) (3)
- Active safety (2)
- Adolescent (2)
- Age (2)
- Air bag (restraint system) (2)
- Aktive Sicherheit (2)
- Alter (2)
- Ankündigung (2)
- Apparatus (measuring) (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Baumusterzulassung (2)
- Bicyclist (2)
- Blendung (2)
- Body (car) (2)
- Braking distance (2)
- Bremsweg (2)
- Cause (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Data acquisition (2)
- Datenerfassung (2)
- Delivery vehicle (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Electric vehicle (2)
- Elektrofahrzeug (2)
- Empfindlichkeit (2)
- Fahranfänger (2)
- Fatality (2)
- Federung (2)
- Forschungsbericht (2)
- France (2)
- Frankreich (2)
- Glare (2)
- Griffigkeit (2)
- Highway traffic (2)
- Impact study (2)
- Individueller Verkehr (2)
- Industrie (2)
- Industry (2)
- International (2)
- Jugendlicher (2)
- Karosserie (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Kunststoff (2)
- Landstraße (2)
- Mathematical model (2)
- Nummer (2)
- Plastic material (2)
- Private transport (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Prüfstand (2)
- Rear view mirror (2)
- Recently qualified driver (2)
- Rechenmodell (2)
- Reconstruction (accid) (2)
- Reflectorized material (2)
- Reflexstoffe (2)
- Road network (2)
- Rural road (2)
- Rückspiegel (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Sensitivity (2)
- Sensor (2)
- Skidding resistance (2)
- Straßennetz (2)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (2)
- Suspension (veh) (2)
- Test rig (2)
- Traffic count (2)
- Transport (2)
- Tödlicher Unfall (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vehicle inspection (2)
- Verkehrserhebung (2)
- Versuchspuppe (2)
- Veränderung (2)
- Visual display (2)
- Zahl (2)
- Zulassung (tech) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- Abdomen (1)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (1)
- Acceleration (1)
- Accident data (1)
- Accident proneness (1)
- Accompanied driving (1)
- Adaptive cruise control (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anhänger (1)
- Anti blocking device (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Attention (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Axle (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Baustoff (1)
- Begleitetes Fahren (1)
- Begrenzungsleuchten (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Benefit cost analysis (1)
- Berechnung (1)
- Beschleunigung (1)
- Betriebsverhalten (1)
- Bibliographie (1)
- Bibliography (1)
- Bildschirm (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Bonnet (car) (1)
- Brake light (1)
- Bremslicht (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Bumper (1)
- Calculation (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Carriageway (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Coefficient of friction (1)
- Colour (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Components of the car (1)
- Compression (1)
- Construction (1)
- Contact (tyre road) (1)
- Control (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crash helmet (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Cycle car (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Data security (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Daytime running light (1)
- Deceleration (1)
- Decke (Straße) (1)
- Deckschicht (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Demand (econ) (1)
- Demographie (1)
- Deutschland ; Konferenz (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Dimension (1)
- Disabled person (1)
- Distribution (gen) (1)
- Driver experience (1)
- Driving aptitude (1)
- Durability (1)
- Durchsichtigkeit (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emission (1)
- Emission control (1)
- Emissionskontrolle (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Environment (1)
- Environment protection (1)
- Erfahrung (menschl) (1)
- Erste Hilfe (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Experience (human) (1)
- Experimental road (1)
- Expert system (1)
- Expertensystem (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahn (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrbare Barriere (1)
- Fahrstreifen (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrtauglichkeit (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugabstand (1)
- Fahrzeugachse (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Fahrzeugteile (1)
- Failure (1)
- Farbe (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- First aid (1)
- Force (1)
- Form (1)
- Four wheel drive (1)
- Fracht (1)
- Frau (1)
- Freight (1)
- Front (1)
- Fuel consumption (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Gebiet (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Gestaltung (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Gussasphalt (1)
- Haftung (jur) (1)
- Halogen (1)
- Halogene (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Hazard (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Hell (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- In service behaviour (1)
- In situ (1)
- Intelligent transport system (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Interview (1)
- Italien (1)
- Italy (1)
- Itinerary (1)
- Japan (1)
- Kamera (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Kleinwagen (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kraft (1)
- Kraftstoffverbrauch (1)
- Körperstellung (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Layout (1)
- Liability (1)
- Lichtstärke (1)
- Lieferfahrzeug (1)
- Light (colour) (1)
- Light intensity (1)
- Limit (1)
- Location (1)
- Lochstreifen (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Material (constr) (1)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Mobile barrier (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Mobilität (1)
- Motorhaube (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nachfrage (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Naturalistic Driving (1)
- Naturalistic driving (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Oberfläche (1)
- On the spot accident investigation (1)
- Optimum (1)
- Optische Anzeige (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Overturning (veh) (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Population (1)
- Posture (1)
- Properties (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public relations (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Punched tape (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radial (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Rear (1)
- Region (1)
- Reibungsbeiwert (1)
- Reiseweg (1)
- Research report (1)
- Retread tyre (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road (1)
- Road traffic (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rolling resistance (1)
- Rollwiderstand (1)
- Runderneuerter Reifen (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Saftey (1)
- Sample (stat) (1)
- Schall (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schutzhelm (1)
- Schweregrad (unfall (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Schwingung (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Side (1)
- Side light (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Sound (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Stability (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- Standfestigkeit (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steuerung (1)
- Stichprobe (1)
- Stoßstange (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Surface (1)
- Surfacing (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Tagesfahrlicht (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (1)
- Technische Überwachung (1)
- Technische Überwachung (Fahrzeug) (1)
- Teenage driver (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Temperatur (1)
- Temperature (1)
- Tests (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic lanes (1)
- Traffic motivation (1)
- Traffic regulation (1)
- Traffic regulations (1)
- Traffic sign (1)
- Traffic survey (1)
- Trailer (1)
- Train (1)
- Transparent (1)
- Transport infrastructure (1)
- Trend (stat) (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- USA (1)
- Umwelt (1)
- Umweltschutz (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfalldaten (1)
- Unfallneigung (1)
- Unfallverhuetung (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Unterleib (1)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle Regulations (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle spacing (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (1)
- Verkehrsmotivation (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Verkehrsuntersuchung (1)
- Verkehrszeichen (1)
- Versuchsstrecke (1)
- Verteilung (allg) (1)
- Verzögerung (1)
- Vibration (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Vierradantrieb (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Warnung (1)
- Wearing course (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- verletzung) (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
- Überschlagen (1)
Safety of light goods vehicles - findings from the German joint project of BASt, DEKRA, UDV and VDA
(2011)
Light goods vehicles (LGVs) are an important part of the vehicle fleet, providing a vital component in the European transportation system. On the other hand, LGVs are in the focus of public discussion regarding road safety. In order to analyse the accident situation of LGVs in an objective manner, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt), VDA, DEKRA and German Insurers Accident Research (UDV) launched a joint project. The aim of this project, which will be finished by mid of 2011, is to identify reasonable measures which will further improve the safety of LGVs. For the first time, these partners jointly together conducted a research project and put together their know-how in accident research. Analyses are based on real-life accident data from the GIDAS database, the Accident Database of UDV (UDB), the DEKRA database and national statistics. The findings deliver answers to questions within the arena of future legislative actions and consumer protection activities. The analyses of databases cover areas of primary and secondary safety of LGVs with a special focus on advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), driver behaviour as well as partner and occupant protection. Key figures from national statistics are used to highlight hotspots of accidents of LGVs in Germany. Finally, the proposed countermeasures are assessed regarding their potential effectiveness. Amongst others, the results show that the accident situation of LGVs is very similar to that of passenger cars. Noteworthy variations could be found in collisions with pedestrians, at reversing and regarding accident causes. Occupant safety of LGVs is on a higher level compared to cars. Results indicate that seatbelt use is on a significantly lower level compared to cars. This leads to higher-than-average injury risk for unbelted LGV occupants. When it comes to partner protection, there are problems with compatibility at LGVs. For car occupants there is a very high injury risk when colliding with a LGV. It indicates that higher passive safety test standards for LGVs would be counterproductive if they further increase stiffness of LGVs. The analysis of LGV-pedestrian accidents shows that pedestrian kinematic differs significantly from car-pedestrian accidents. At this point, existing pedestrian related test standards developed for cars cannot be adopted to LGVs. When it comes to active safety, ESC proved its effectiveness once again. Beyond that, rear view cameras, advanced emergency braking systems and lane departure warning systems show a safety potential, too. In addition to any technical countermeasures previously discussed, the importance of the driver behavior and attitude regarding the accident risk was investigated. In order to develop successful actions it is important to understand the main target population. In the case of LGV especially the crafts business and smaller companies are the major contributors the safety issue.
It is well known that most accidents with pedestrians are caused by the driver not being alert or misinterpreting the situation. For that reason advanced forward looking safety systems have a high potential to improve safety for this group of vulnerable road users. Active pedestrian protection systems combine reduction of impact speed by driver warning and/or autonomous braking with deployment of protective devices shortly before the imminent impact. According to the Euro NCAP roadmap the Autonomous Emergency Braking system tests for Pedestrians Protection will be set in force from 2016 onwards. Various projects and organisations in Europe are developing performance tests and assessment procedures as accompanying measures to the Euro NCAP initiative. To provide synthesised input to Euro NCAP so-called Harmonisation Platforms (HP-) have been established. Their main goal is to foster exchange of information on key subjects, thereby generating a clear overview of similarities and differences on the approaches chosen and, on that basis, recommend on future test procedures. In this paper activities of the Harmonisation Platform 2 on the development of Test Equipment are presented. For the testing targets that mimic humans different sensing technologies are required. A first set of specifications for pedestrian targets and the propulsion systems as collected by Harmonisation Platform 2 are presented together with a first evaluation for a number of available tools.
For a number of EU regulatory acts Virtual Testing (VT) is already allowed for type approval (see Commission Regulation No. 371/2010 of 16 April 2010 amending the Framework Directive 2007/46/EC). However, only a very general procedure on how to apply VT for type approval is provided. Technical details for specific regulatory acts are not given yet. The main objective of the European project IMVITER (IMplementation of VIrtual TEsting in Safety Regulations) was to promote the implementation of VT in safety regulations. When proposing VT procedures the new regulation was taken into account, in particular, addressing open issues. Special attention was paid to pedestrian protection as pilot cases. A key aspect for VT implementation is to demonstrate that the employed simulation models are reliable. This paper describes how the Verification and Validation (V&V) method defined by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers was adapted for pedestrian protection VT based assessment. or the certification of headform impactors an extensive study was performed at two laboratories to assess the variability in calibration tests and equivalent results from a set of simulation models. Based on these results a methodology is defined for certification of headform impactor simulation models. A similar study was also performed with one vehicle in the type approval test setup. Its bonnet was highly instrumented and subjected to 45 impacts in five different positions at two laboratories in order to obtain an estimation of the variability in the physical tests. An equivalent study was performed using stochastic simulation with a metamodel fed with observed variability in impact conditions of physical headforms. An estimation of the test method uncertainty was obtained and used in the definition of a validation corridor for simulation models. Validation metric and criteria were defined in cooperation with the ISO TC22 SC10 and SC12 WG4 "Virtual Testing". A complete validation procedure including different test setups, physical magnitudes and evaluation criteria is provided. A detailed procedural flowchart is developed for VT implementation in EC Regulation No 78/2009 based on a so called "Hybrid VT" approach, which combines real hardware based head impact tests and simulations. This detailed flowchart is shown and explained within this paper. Another important point within the virtual testing based procedures is the documentation of relevant information resulting from the verification and validation process of the numerical models used. For this purpose report templates were developed within the project. The proposed procedure fixes minimum V&V requirements for numerical models to be confidently used within the type-approval process. It is not intended to be a thorough guide on how to build such reliable models. Different modeling methodologies are therefore possible, according to particular OEM know-how. These requirements respond to a balance amongst the type-approval stakeholders interests. A cost-benefit analysis, which was also performed within the IMVITER project, supports this approach, showing the conditions in which VT implementation is beneficial. Based on the experience gained in the project and the background of the experts involved an outlook is given as a roadmap of VT implementation, identifying the most important milestones to be reached along the way to a future vehicle type approval procedure supported by VT. The results presented in this paper show an important step addressing open questions and fostering the future acceptance of virtual testing in pedestrian protection type approval procedures.
The objectives of the FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) project are to answer the remaining open questions identified in earlier projects (such as understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of force based metrics and barrier deformation based metrics, confirmation of specific compatibility issues such as structural interaction, investigation of force matching) and to finalise the frontal impact test procedures required to assess compatibility. Research strategies and priorities were based on earlier research programs and the FIMCAR accident data analysis. The identified real world safety issues were used to develop a list of compatibility characteristics which were then prioritised within the consortium. This list was the basis for evaluating the different test candidates. This analysis resulted in the combination of the Full Width Deformable Barrier test (FWDB) with compatibility metrics and the existing Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) as described in UN-ECE Regulation 94 with additional cabin integrity requirement as being proposed as the FIMCAR assessment approach. The proposed frontal impact assessment approach addresses many of the issues identified by the FIMCAR consortium but not all frontal impact and compatibility issues could be addressed.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and the final report to the steering committee on frontal impact [Faerber 2007] and the FP5 VC-COMPAT[Edwards 2007] project activities, two test approaches were identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis will be performed. In the FIMCAR Deliverable D 3.1 [Adolph 2013] the development and assessment of criteria and associated performance limits for the full width test procedure were reported. In this Deliverable D3.2 analyses of the test data (full width tests, car-to-car tests and component tests), further development and validation of the full width assessment protocol and development of the load cell and load cell wall specification are reported. The FIMCAR full-width assessment procedure consists of a 50 km/h test against the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB). The Load Cell Wall behind the deformable element assesses whether or not important Energy Absorbing Structures are within the Common Interaction Zone as defined based on the US part 581 zone. The metric evaluates the row forces and requires that the forces directly above and below the centre line of the Common Interaction Zone exceed a minimum threshold. Analysis of the load spreading showed that metrics that rely on sum forces of rows and columns are within acceptable tolerances. Furthermore it was concluded that the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the FWDB test is acceptable. The FWDB test was shown to be capable to detect lower load paths that are beneficial in car-to-car impacts.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were to review existing full-width test procedures and their discussed compatibility metrics, to report recent activities and findings with respect to full-width assessment procedures and to assess test procedures and metrics. Starting with a review of previous work, candidate metrics and associated performance limits to assess a vehicle- structural interaction potential, in particular its structural alignment, have been developed for both the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB) and Full Width Rigid Barrier (FWRB) tests. Initial work was performed to develop a concept to assess a vehicle- frontal force matching. However, based on the accident analyses performed within FIMCAR frontal force matching was not evaluated as a first priority and thus in line with FIMCAR strategy the focus was put on the development of metrics for the assessment of structural interaction which was evaluated as a first priority.
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
The objective of this deliverable is to describe the expected influence of the candidate test procedures developed in FIMCAR for frontal impact on other impact types. The other impact types of primary interest are front-to-side impacts, collisions with road restraint systems (e.g. guardrails), and heavy goods vehicle impacts. These collision types were chosen as they involve structures that can be adapted to improve safety. Collisions with vulnerable road users (VRU) were not explicitly investigated in FIMCAR. It is expected that the vehicle structures of interest in FIMCAR can be designed into a VRU friendly shell. Information used for this deliverable comes from simulations and car-to-car crash tests conducted in FIMCAR or review of previous research. Three test configurations (full width, offset, and moving deformable barriers) were the input to the FIMCAR selection process. There are three different types of offset tests and two different full width tests. During the project test procedures could be divided into three groups that provide different influences or outcomes on vehicle designs: 1. The ODB barrier provides a method to assess part of the vehicles energy absorption capabilities and compartment test in one test. 2. The FWRB and FWDB have similar capabilities to control structural alignment, further assess energy absorption capabilities, and promote the improvements in the occupant restraint system for high deceleration impacts. 3. The PDB and MPDB can be used to promote better load spreading in the vehicle structures, in addition to assessing energy absorption and occupant compartment strength in an offset configuration. The consortium selected the ODB and FWDB as the two best candidates for short term application in international rulemaking. The review of how all candidates would affect vehicle performance in other impacts (beside front-to-front vehicle or frontal impacts with fixed obstacles) however is reported in this deliverable to support the benefit analysis reported in FIMCAR. The grouping presented above is used to discuss all five test candidates using similarities between certain tests and thereby simplify the discussion.
Accident analysis
(2014)
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the EC funded FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in today- research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The specific objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were: - Determine if previously identified compatibility issues are still relevant in current vehicle fleet: Structural interaction, Frontal force matching, Compartment strength in particular for light cars. - Determine nature of injuries and injury mechanisms: Body regions injured o Injury mechanism: Contact with intrusion, Contact, Deceleration / restraint induced. The main data sources for this report were the CCIS and Stats 19 databases from Great Britain and the GIDAS database from Germany. The different sampling and reporting schemes for the detailed databases (CCIS & GIDAS) sometimes do not allow for direct comparisons of the results. However the databases are complementary " CCIS captures more severe collisions highlighting structure and injury issues while GIDAS provides detailed data for a broader range of crash severities. The following results represent the critical points for further development of test procedures in FIMCAR.
The off-set assessment procedure potentially contributes to the FIMCAR objectives to maintain the compartment strength and to assess load spreading in frontal collisions. Furthermore it provides the opportunity to assess the restraint system performance with different pulses if combined with a full-width assessment procedure in the frontal assessment approach. Originally it was expected that the PDB assessment procedure would be selected for the FIMCAR assessment approach. However, it was not possible to deliver a compatibility metric in time so that the current off-set procedure (ODB as used in UNECE R94) with some minor modifications was proposed for the FIMCAR Assessment Approach. Nevertheless the potential to assess load spreading, which appears not to be possible with any other assessed frontal impact assessment procedure was considered to be still high. Therefore the development work for the PDB assessment procedure did not stop with the decision not to select the PDB procedure. As a result of the decisions to use the current ODB and to further develop the PDB procedure, both are covered within this deliverable. The deliverable describes the off-set test procedure that will be recommended by FIMCAR consortium, this corresponds to the ODB test as it is specified in UN-ECE Regulation 94 (R94), i.e. EEVC deformable element with 40% overlap at a test speed of 56 km/h. In addition to the current R94 requirements, FIMCAR will recommend to introduce some structural requirements which will guarantee sufficiently strong occupant compartments by enforcing the stability of the forward occupant cell. With respect to the PDB assessment procedure a new metric, Digital Derivative in Y direction - DDY, was developed, described, analysed, and compared with other metrics. The DDY metric analyses the deformation gradients laterally across the PDB face. The more even the deformation, the lower the DDY values and the better the metric- result. In order analyse the different metrics, analysis of the existing PDB test results and the results of the performed simulation studies was performed. In addition, an assessment of artificial deformation profiles with the metrics took place. This analysis shows that there are still issues with the DDY metric but it appears that it is possible to solve them with future optimisations. For example the current metric assesses only the area within 60% of the half vehicle width. For vehicles that have the longitudinals further outboard, the metric is not effective. In addition to the metric development, practical issues of the PDB tests such as the definition of a scan procedure for the analysis of the deformation pattern including the validation of the scanning procedure by the analysis of 3 different scans at different locations of the same barrier were addressed. Furthermore the repeatability and reproducibility of the PDB was analysed. The barrier deformation readings seem to be sensitive with respect to the impact accuracy. In total, the deliverable is meant to define the FIMCAR off-set assessment procedure and to be a starting point for further development of the PDB assessment procedure.