Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (45) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (18)
- Konferenz (18)
- Impact test (veh) (16)
- Anfahrversuch (15)
- Test method (15)
- Bewertung (14)
- Evaluation (assessment) (14)
- Prüfverfahren (14)
- Anthropometric dummy (12)
- Dummy (12)
- Fußgänger (11)
- Injury (11)
- Pedestrian (11)
- Verletzung (11)
- Accident (9)
- Simulation (9)
- Unfall (9)
- Analyse (math) (8)
- Analysis (math) (8)
- Collision (8)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (8)
- Head on collision (8)
- Biomechanics (7)
- Biomechanik (7)
- Deutschland (7)
- Germany (7)
- Radfahrer (7)
- Safety (7)
- Sicherheit (7)
- Zusammenstoß (7)
- Child (6)
- Cyclist (6)
- Driver assistance system (6)
- Europa (6)
- Europe (6)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (6)
- Kind (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (6)
- Severity (accid, injury) (6)
- Car (5)
- Head (5)
- Insasse (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Kopf (5)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (5)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (5)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (5)
- Side impact (5)
- Vehicle occupant (5)
- Verletzung) (5)
- injury) (5)
- Alte Leute (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Driver (4)
- Fahrer (4)
- Fahrzeug (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Passive safety system (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Severity (accid (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Accident prevention (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Bemessung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Compatibility (3)
- Database (3)
- Datenbank (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (3)
- Design (overall design) (3)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (3)
- Fahrzeugsitz (3)
- Front (3)
- Improvement (3)
- Interior (veh) (3)
- Kompatibilität (3)
- Modification (3)
- Old people (3)
- Pkw (3)
- Seat (veh) (3)
- Standardisierung (3)
- Standardization (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Statistik (3)
- Unfallverhütung (3)
- Use (3)
- Vehicle (3)
- Verbesserung (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Active safety system (2)
- Airbag (2)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (2)
- Automatic (2)
- Automatisch (2)
- Autonomes Fahren (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous driving (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Belastung (2)
- Braking (2)
- Bremsung (2)
- Classification (2)
- Cost benefit analysis (2)
- Deformation (2)
- Driver information (2)
- Error (2)
- Fahrerinformation (2)
- Fahrstabilität (2)
- Fatality (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Forecast (2)
- Gesetzgebung (2)
- Hospital (2)
- Human body (2)
- Intelligent transport system (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Krankenhaus (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Load (2)
- Menschlicher Körper (2)
- Motorcyclist (2)
- Motorradfahrer (2)
- On the spot accident investigation (2)
- Prognose (2)
- Safety belt (2)
- Sicherheitsgurt (2)
- Technologie (2)
- Technology (2)
- Tödlicher Unfall (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (2)
- Vehicle handling (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (2)
- (menschl) (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Accident reconstruction (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anti locking device (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antikollisionssystem (1)
- Aufprallschlitten (1)
- Ausrüstung (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Bein (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Cause (1)
- Cervical vertebrae (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Collision avoidance system (1)
- Communication (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Crash Test (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Data security (1)
- Datenerfassung (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Detection (1)
- Detektion (1)
- Development (1)
- Durability (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Empfindlichkeit (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Equipment (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Foot (not a measure) (1)
- Forschungsarbeit (1)
- Frau (1)
- Fuß (1)
- Gewicht (1)
- Halswirbel (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Impact sled (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Impact test (1)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interface (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knie (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Kraftfahrzeug (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (1)
- Mathematical model (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Messung (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorcycle (1)
- Motorrad (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Norm (tech) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Prototyp (1)
- Prototype (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Rear (1)
- Rechenmodell (1)
- Reconstruction (accid) (1)
- Research project (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Risiko (1)
- Risk (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Schnittstelle (1)
- Schutz (1)
- Seite (1)
- Sensitivity (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Severity (acid (1)
- Side (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Spain (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Specification (standard) (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Spinal column (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Stress (psychol) (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Test (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Ursache (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle regulations (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verformung (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Versuch (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Weight (1)
- Windschutzscheibe (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirbelsäule (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zusammenstoss (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (45) (entfernen)
In the European Project FIMCAR, a proposal for a frontal impact test configuration was developed which included an additional full width deformable barrier (FWDB) test. Motivation for the deformable element was partly to measure structural forces as well as to produce a severe crash pulse different from that in the offset test. The objective of this study was to analyze the safety performance of vehicles in the full width rigid barrier test (FWRB) and in the full width deformable barrier test (FWDB). In total, 12 vehicles were crashed in both configurations. Comparison of these tests to real world accident data was used to identify the crash barrier most representative of real world crashes. For all vehicles, the airbag visible times were later in the FWDB configuration. This was attributed to the attenuation of the initial acceleration peak, observed in FWRB tests, by the addition of the deformable element. These findings were in alignment with airbag triggering times seen in real world crash data. Also, the dummy loadings were slightly worse in FWDB compared to FWRB tests, which is possibly linked to the airbag firing and a more realistic loading of the vehicle crash structures in the FWDB configuration. Evaluations of the lower extremities have shown a general increasing of the tibia index with the crash pulse severity.
In general the passive safety capability is much greater in newer versus older cars due to the stiff compartment preventing intrusion in severe collisions. However, the stiffer structure which increases the deceleration can lead to a change in injury patterns. In order to analyse possible injury mechanisms for thoracic and lumbar spine injuries, data from the German Inâ€Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) were used in this study. A twoâ€step approach of statistical and caseâ€byâ€case analysis was applied for this investigation. In total 4,289 collisions were selected involving 8,844 vehicles, 5,765 injured persons and 9,468 coded injuries. Thoracic and lumbar spine injuries such as burst, compression or dislocation fractures as well as soft tissue injuries were found to occur in frontal impacts even without intrusion to the passenger compartment. If a MAIS 2+ injury occurred, in 15% of the cases a thoracic and/or lumbar spine injury is included. Considering AIS 2+ thoracic and lumbar spine, most injuries were fractures and occurred in the lumbar spine area. From the case by case analyses it can be concluded that lumbar spine fractures occur in accidents without the engagement of longitudinals, lateral loading to the occupant and/or very severe accidents with MAIS being much higher than the spine AIS.
Advancing active safety towards the protection of vulnerable road users: the PROSPECT project
(2017)
Accidents involving Vulnerable Road Users (VRU) are still a very significant issue for road safety. According to the World Health Organisation, pedestrian and cyclist deaths account for more than 25% of all road traffic deaths worldwide. Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems have the potential to improve safety for these VRU groups. The PROSPECT project (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) aims to significantly improve the effectiveness of active VRU safety systems compared to those currently on the market by expanding the scope of scenarios addressed by the systems and improving the overall system performance. The project pursues an integrated approach: Newest available accident data combined with naturalistic observations and HMI guidelines represent key inputs for the system specifications, which form the basis for the system development. For system development, two main aspects are considered: advanced sensor processing with situation analysis, and intervention strategies including braking and steering. All these concepts are implemented in several vehicle prototypes. Special emphasis is put on balancing system performance in critical scenarios and avoiding undesired system activations. For system validation, testing in realistic scenarios will be done. Results will allow the performance assessment of the developed concepts and a cost-benefit analysis. The findings within the PROSPECT project will contribute to the generation of state -of-the-art knowledge, technical innovations, assessment methodologies and tools for advancing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems towards the protection of VRUs. The introduction of a new generation safety system in the market will enhance VRU road safety in 2020-2025, contributing to the "Vision Zero" objective of no fatalities or serious injuries in road traffic set out in the Transport White Paper. Furthermore, the test methodologies and tools developed within the project shall be considered for the New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) future roadmaps, supporting the European Commission goal of halving the road toll in the 2011-2020 timeframe.
According to the German road traffic regulations children up to the age of 12 or a height below 150 cm have to use approved and appropriate child restraint systems (CRS). CRS must be approved according to UN-ECE Regulation No. 44. The regulation classifies CRS in 5 weight categories. The upper weight group is approved for children from 22 to 36 kg. However, studies show that already today many children weigh more than 36 kg although they have not reached a height of 150 cm. Therefore, no ECE R44 approved CRS is available for these overweight children. In conclusion, today's sizes and weights of children are no longer represented by the current version of the ECE R44. The heaviest used dummy (P10) weighs just 32.6 kg and has a height of 137.9 cm. Statistical data of German children show that already 5% of the children at a height of 137.9 cm have a weight above 45.3 kg. Regarding children at a height of 145 cm, the 95th percentile limit is at a weight of 53.3 kg. Based on these data 4 dummies with different heights and weights were defined and produced. Two of them are overweight. Up to now, there is no experience how current child restraint systems perform in a car crash if they are used by children with a weight above 36 kg and a height smaller than 150 cm. In the future, different child restraint systems will be tested with respect to the ECE R44 regulation using these overweight dummies.
Die Kommunikation zwischen Fahrzeugen und Infrastrukturkomponenten steht vor der Einführung in Europa. Dieser Beitrag stellt zunächst die grundlegende Technologie zum Austausch von Nachrichten und ein Pilotprojekt vor, innerhalb dessen eine sichere Fahrzeug-zu-Infrastruktur Kommunikation konzipiert und praktisch erprobt wird. Darauf aufbauend werden Sicherheitsfragestellungen von Infrastrukturkomponenten beleuchtet und ein Einblick in das Schlüsselmanagement sowohl für Fahrzeuge als auch Infrastrukturkomponenten gegeben.
The head impact of pedestrians in the windscreen area shows a high relevance in real-world accidents. Nevertheless, there are neither biomechanical limits nor elaborated testing procedures available. Furthermore, the development of deployable protection systems like pop-up bonnets or external airbags has made faster progress than the corresponding testing methods. New requirements which are currently not considered are taken into account within a research project of BASt and the EC funded APROSYS (Advanced PROtection SYStems) integrated project relating to passive pedestrian protection. Testing procedures for head impact in the windscreen area should address these new boundary conditions. The presented modular procedure combines the advantages of virtual testing, including full-scale multi-body and finite element simulations, as well as hardware testing containing impactor tests based on the existing procedures of EEVC WG 17. To meet the efforts of harmonization in legislation, it refers to the Global Technical Regulation of UNECE (GTR No. 9). The basis for this combined hardware and virtual testing procedure is a robust categorization covering all passenger cars and light commercial vehicles and defining the testing zone including the related kinematics. The virtual testing part supports also the choice of the impact points for the hardware test and determines head impact timing for testing deployable systems. The assessment of the neck rotation angle and sharp edge contact in the rear gap of pop-up bonnets is included. For the demonstration of this procedure, a hardware sedan shaped vehicle was modified by integrating an airbag system. In addition, tests with the Honda Polar-II Dummy were performed for an evaluation of the new testing procedure. Comparing these results, it was concluded that a combination of simulation and updated subsystem tests forms an important step towards enhanced future pedestrian safety systems considering the windscreen area and the deployable systems.
Side-impact safety of passenger cars is assessed in Europe in a full-scale test using a moving barrier. The front of this barrier is deformable and represents the stiffness of an 'average' car. The EU Directive 96/27/EC on side impact protection has adopted the EEVC Side Impact Test Procedure, including the original performance specification for the barrier face when impacting a flat dynamometric rigid wall. The requirements of the deformable barrier face, as laid down in the Directive, are related to geometrical characteristics, deformation characteristics and energy dissipation figures. Due to these limited requirements, many variations are possible in designing a deformable barrier face. As a result, several barrier face designs are in the market. However, research institutes and car manufacturers report significant difference in test results when using these different devices. It appears that the present approval test is not able to distinguish between the different designs that may perform differently when they impact real vehicles. Therefore, EEVC Working Group 13 has developed a number of tests to evaluate the different designs. In these tests the barrier faces are loaded and deformed in a specific and/or more representative way. Barrier faces of different design have been evaluated. In the paper the set-up and the reasoning behind the tests is presented. Results showing specific differences in performance are demonstrated.
The frontal crash is still an important contributor to deaths and serious injured resulting from road accidents in Europe. As the Hybrid-III dummy used in crash tests is over two decades old, the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee is studying the potential for a new test device. Key is the availability of a well-defined set of requirements that identifies the minimum level of biofidelity required for an advanced frontal dummy. In this paper, a complete set of frontal impact biofidelity requirements, consisting of references , description of test conditions and corridors, is presented.
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe (EU27) is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car's safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EU-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car's frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation. This paper reports the cost benefit analyses performed to estimate the effect of the following potential changes to the frontal impact regulation: • Option 1 " No change and allow current measures to propagate throughout the vehicle fleet. • Option 2 " Add a full width test to the current offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) test. • Option 3 " Add a full width test and replace the current ODB test with a Progressive Deformable Barrier (PDB) test. For the analyses national data were used from Great Britain (STATS 19) and from Germany (German Federal Statistical Office). In addition in-depth real word crash data were used from CCIS (Great Britain) and GIDAS (Germany). To estimate the benefit a generalised linear model, an injury reduction model and a matched pairs modelling approach were applied. The benefits were estimated to be: for Option 1 "No change" about 2.0%; for Option 2 "FW test" ranging from 5 to 12% and for Option 3 "FW and PDB tests" 9 to 14% of car occupant killed and seriously injured casualties.
One main objective of the EU-Project SENIORS is to provide improved methods to assess thoracic injury risk to elderly occupants. In contribution to this task paired simulations with a THOR dummy model and human body model will be used to develop improved thoracic injury risk functions. The simulation results can provide data for injury criteria development in chest loading conditions that are underrepresented in PMHS test data sets that currently proposed risk functions are based on. To support this approach a new simplified generic but representative sled test fixture and CAE model for testing and simulation were developed. The parameter definition and evaluation of this sled test fixture and model is presented in this paper. The justification and definition of requirements for this test set-up was based on experience from earlier studies. Simple test fixtures like the gold standard sled fixture are easy to build and also to model in CAE, but provide too severe belt-only loading. On the other hand a vehicle buck including production components like airbag and seat is more representative, but difficult to model and to be replicated at a different laboratory. Furthermore some components might not be available for physical tests at later stage. The basis of the SENIORS generic sled test set-up is the gold standard fixture with a cable seat back and foot rest. No knee restraint was used. The seat pan design was modified including a seat ramp. The three-point belt system had a generic adjustable load limiter. A pre-inflated driver airbag assembly was developed for the test fixture. Results of THOR test and simulations in different configurations will be presented. The configurations include different deceleration pulses. Further parameter variations are related to the restraint system including belt geometry and load limiter levels. Additionally different settings of the generic airbag were evaluated. The test set-up was evaluated and optimized in tests with the THOR-M dummy in different test configurations. Belt restraint parameters like D-ring position and load limiter setting were modified to provide moderate chest loading to the occupant. This resulted in dummy readings more representative of the loading in a contemporary vehicle than most available PMHS sled tests reported in the literature. However, to achieve a loading configuration that exposes the occupant to even less severe loading comparable to modern vehicle restraints it might be necessary to further modify the test set-up. The new generic sled test set-up and a corresponding CAE model were developed and applied in tests and simulations with THOR. Within the SENIORS project with this test set-up also volunteer and PMHS as well as HBM simulations are performed, which will be reported in other publications. The test environment can contribute in future studies to the assessment of existing and new frontal impact dummies as well as dummy improvements and related instrumentation. The test set-up and model could also serve as a new standard test environment for PMHS and volunteer tests as well as HBM simulations.