Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (74) (entfernen)
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (74) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Bewertung (20)
- Evaluation (assessment) (19)
- Safety (18)
- Sicherheit (18)
- Anfahrversuch (16)
- Conference (16)
- Konferenz (16)
- Prüfverfahren (16)
- Test method (16)
- Impact test (veh) (15)
- Injury (15)
- Verletzung (15)
- Accident (13)
- Dummy (13)
- Unfall (13)
- Anthropometric dummy (12)
- Fußgänger (12)
- Pedestrian (12)
- Simulation (11)
- Collision (10)
- Europa (10)
- Europe (10)
- Deutschland (9)
- Driver assistance system (9)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (9)
- Germany (9)
- Head on collision (9)
- Zusammenstoß (9)
- Analyse (math) (8)
- Analysis (math) (8)
- Biomechanics (8)
- Biomechanik (8)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (8)
- Fahrzeug (7)
- Radfahrer (7)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (7)
- Verletzung) (7)
- injury) (7)
- Cyclist (6)
- Head (6)
- Kopf (6)
- Messung (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (6)
- Severity (accid, injury) (6)
- Vehicle (6)
- Car (5)
- Child (5)
- Datenbank (5)
- Driver (5)
- Fahrer (5)
- Kind (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Measurement (5)
- Passive safety system (5)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (5)
- Risikobewertung (5)
- Risk assessment (5)
- Severity (accid (5)
- Standardisierung (5)
- Standardization (5)
- Transport infrastructure (5)
- Tunnel (5)
- Accident prevention (4)
- Alte Leute (4)
- Autobahn (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Compatibility (4)
- Deformation (4)
- Fatality (4)
- Impact test (4)
- Improvement (4)
- Insasse (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Kompatibilität (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Motorway (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Research project (4)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (4)
- Side impact (4)
- Test (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Tödlicher Unfall (4)
- Unfallverhütung (4)
- Vehicle occupant (4)
- Verbesserung (4)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (4)
- Versuch (4)
- Autonomes Fahren (3)
- Autonomous driving (3)
- Behaviour (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Bemessung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Braking (3)
- Bremsung (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (3)
- Design (overall design) (3)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (3)
- Forschungsarbeit (3)
- Gefahrenabwehr (3)
- Gesetzgebung (3)
- Hospital (3)
- Interior (veh) (3)
- Krankenhaus (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Modification (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Old people (3)
- Pkw (3)
- Security (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Statistik (3)
- Use (3)
- Verformung (3)
- Verhalten (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Active safety system (2)
- Air pollution (2)
- Airbag (2)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Attitude (psychol) (2)
- Aufprallschlitten (2)
- Automatic (2)
- Automatisch (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Belastung (2)
- Boden (2)
- Cervical vertebrae (2)
- Classification (2)
- Climate change (2)
- Cost benefit analysis (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Data acquisition (2)
- Data bank (2)
- Database (2)
- Datenerfassung (2)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Development (2)
- Driver information (2)
- Driving (veh) (2)
- Durability (2)
- Einstellung (psychol) (2)
- Electric vehicle (2)
- Elektrofahrzeug (2)
- Entwicklung (2)
- Error (2)
- Fahrerinformation (2)
- Fahrstabilität (2)
- Fahrzeugführung (2)
- Fahrzeugsitz (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Fire (2)
- Front (2)
- Halswirbel (2)
- Highway design (2)
- Human body (2)
- Impact sled (2)
- Intelligent transport system (2)
- International (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Klimawandel (2)
- Landstraße (2)
- Load (2)
- Luftverunreinigung (2)
- Mathematical model (2)
- Medical aspects (2)
- Medizinische Gesichtspunkte (2)
- Menschlicher Körper (2)
- Method (2)
- Motorcycle (2)
- Motorrad (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- On the spot accident investigation (2)
- Rechenmodell (2)
- Road network (2)
- Rural road (2)
- Safety belt (2)
- Seat (veh) (2)
- Severity (acid (2)
- Sicherheitsgurt (2)
- Soil (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Spinal column (2)
- Straßenentwurf (2)
- Straßennetz (2)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (2)
- Surfacing (2)
- Technologie (2)
- Technology (2)
- Traffic regulations (2)
- USA (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (2)
- Vehicle handling (2)
- Wirbelsäule (2)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (2)
- (menschl) (1)
- Abfluss (1)
- Absorption (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Air quality management (1)
- Air transport (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anthropmetric dummy (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Apparatus (measuring) (1)
- Arzneimittel (1)
- Asphaltstraße (Oberbau) (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Ausrüstung (1)
- Bau (1)
- Bearing capacity (1)
- Bein (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Brand (1)
- Bridge (1)
- Bridge management system (1)
- Brücke (1)
- Brücken Management System (1)
- Cadaver (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Camera (1)
- Carriageway (1)
- Cause (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Clay (1)
- Communication (1)
- Condition survey (1)
- Construction (1)
- Correlation (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Critical path method (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data base (1)
- Data processing (1)
- Datenverarbeitung (1)
- Decision process (1)
- Decke (Straße) (1)
- Decke [Straße] (1)
- Deicing (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demand (econ) (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Deterioration (1)
- Diagnostik (1)
- Diffusion (1)
- Digitale Bildverarbeitung (1)
- Dispersion (stat) (1)
- Driving aptitude (1)
- Droge (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Drunkenness (1)
- EU (1)
- Earthworks (1)
- Echtzeit (1)
- Education (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emergency (1)
- Empfindlichkeit (1)
- Enteisung (1)
- Entscheidungsprozess (1)
- Environment (1)
- Environment protection (1)
- Equipment (1)
- Erdarbeiten (1)
- Erste Hilfe (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- Erziehung (1)
- Evaluation (Assessment) (1)
- Expert system (1)
- Expertensystem (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahn (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrstreifen (1)
- Fahrtauglichkeit (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fein (mater) (1)
- Feinstaub (1)
- Fernverkehrsstrasse (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Fine (mater) (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- First aid (1)
- Flexible pavement (1)
- Flooding (1)
- Foot (not a measure) (1)
- Frau (1)
- Fugenfüllung (1)
- Fuß (1)
- Fußgängerbereich (1)
- Geomembran (1)
- Geomembrane (1)
- Geschwindigkeit (1)
- Gewicht (1)
- Greenhouse effect (1)
- Griffigkeit (1)
- Ground water (1)
- Grundwasser (1)
- Haftung (jur) (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Heavy metal (1)
- Height (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Image processing (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Incident detection (1)
- Incident management (1)
- Information (1)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interface (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Interview (1)
- Jahreszeit (1)
- Kamera (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knie (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korn (1)
- Kornverteilung (1)
- Korrelation(Math (1)
- Kraftfahrzeug (1)
- Layer (1)
- Learning (1)
- Lebenszyklus (1)
- Leichnam (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (1)
- Lernen (1)
- Level of service (1)
- Liability (1)
- Luftreinhaltung (1)
- Lufttransport (1)
- Main road (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Materialveraenderung (allg) (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medication (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Merging (1)
- Messgerät (1)
- Mesurement (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorisierungsgrad (1)
- Nachfrage (1)
- Network (traffic) (1)
- Netzplantechnik (1)
- Neural network (1)
- Neuronales Netz (1)
- Nitric acid (1)
- Non destructive testing (1)
- Notfall (1)
- Oberfläche (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- PVC (1)
- Particle (1)
- Particle size distribution (1)
- Particulate matter (1)
- Peat (1)
- Pedestrian precinct (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Planning (1)
- Planung (1)
- Policy (1)
- Politik (1)
- Pollutant (1)
- Polyvinylchloride (1)
- Preloading (soil) (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Probability (1)
- Prototyp (1)
- Prototype (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Rain (1)
- Real-time (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Reconstruction (accid) (1)
- Regen (1)
- Regional planning (1)
- Regionalplanung (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Risiko (1)
- Risikoverhalten (1)
- Risk (1)
- Risk taking (1)
- Road (1)
- Road user (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Run off (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Salpetersäure (1)
- Schadstoff (1)
- Schicht (1)
- Schnittstelle (1)
- Schutz (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schwermetall (1)
- Sealing compound (1)
- Season (1)
- Seite (1)
- Sensitivity (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Service life (1)
- Settlement (1)
- Setzung (1)
- Side (1)
- Skidding resistance (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Spain (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Speed (1)
- Stadtplanung (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- Standardabweichung (1)
- Stat) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Straße (1)
- Stress (psychol) (1)
- Störfallentdeckung (1)
- Störfallmanagement (1)
- Subsoil (1)
- Surface (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (1)
- Test procedure (1)
- Ton (Gestein) (1)
- Torf (1)
- Town planning (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Traffic lane (1)
- Traffic restraint (1)
- Tragfähigkeit (1)
- Transport mode (1)
- Treibhauseffekt (1)
- Trunkenheit (1)
- Umwelt (1)
- Umweltschutz (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (1)
- United Kindom (1)
- Untergrund (1)
- Ursache (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle ownership (1)
- Vehicle regulations (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verfahren (1)
- Verfahren ; Verkehrsinfrastruktur (1)
- Verhütung (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrsbeschränkung (1)
- Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Verkehrsnetz (1)
- Verkehrsqualität (1)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (1)
- Verkehrsverflechtung (1)
- Virtual reality (1)
- Virtuelle Realität (1)
- Vorbelastung (Boden) (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Wahrscheinlichkeit (1)
- Weather (1)
- Weight (1)
- Windschutzscheibe (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Witterung (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (1)
- Zusammenstoss (1)
- Zustandsbewertung (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
- Überschwemmung (1)
Institut
- Sonstige (74) (entfernen)
In general the passive safety capability is much greater in newer versus older cars due to the stiff compartment preventing intrusion in severe collisions. However, the stiffer structure which increases the deceleration can lead to a change in injury patterns. In order to analyse possible injury mechanisms for thoracic and lumbar spine injuries, data from the German Inâ€Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) were used in this study. A twoâ€step approach of statistical and caseâ€byâ€case analysis was applied for this investigation. In total 4,289 collisions were selected involving 8,844 vehicles, 5,765 injured persons and 9,468 coded injuries. Thoracic and lumbar spine injuries such as burst, compression or dislocation fractures as well as soft tissue injuries were found to occur in frontal impacts even without intrusion to the passenger compartment. If a MAIS 2+ injury occurred, in 15% of the cases a thoracic and/or lumbar spine injury is included. Considering AIS 2+ thoracic and lumbar spine, most injuries were fractures and occurred in the lumbar spine area. From the case by case analyses it can be concluded that lumbar spine fractures occur in accidents without the engagement of longitudinals, lateral loading to the occupant and/or very severe accidents with MAIS being much higher than the spine AIS.
Immediate user self-evacuation is crucial in case of fire in road tunnels. This study investigated the effects of information with or without additional virtual reality (VR) behavioural training on self-evacuation during a simulated emergency situation in a road tunnel. Forty-three participants were randomly assigned to three groups with accumulating preventive training: The control group only filled in questionnaires, the informed group additionally read an information brochure on tunnel safety, and the VR training group received an additional behavioural training in a VR tunnel scenario. One week later, during the test session, all participants conducted a drive through a real road tunnel in which they were confronted with a collision of two vehicles and intense smoke. The informed and the behaviourally trained participants evacuated themselves more reliably from the tunnel than participants of the control group. Trained participants showed better and faster behavioural responses than informed only participants. Interestingly, the few participants in the control group who reacted adequately to the scenario were all female. A 1 year follow-up online questionnaire showed a decrease of safety knowledge, but still the trained group had somewhat more safety relevant knowledge than the two other groups. Information and especially VR behavioural training both seem promising to foster adequate self-evacuation during crisis situations in tunnels, although long term beneficial behavioural effects have to be demonstrated. Measures aiming to improve users/ behaviour should take individual difference such as gender into account.
In the project SECMAN " SECurity MANual " a simple four-step procedure for the identification of critical road infrastructures, assessment of these infrastructures regarding various man-made threats and the determination of effective protection measures was developed. These methodologies are summarized and combined into a comprehensive best-practice manual which allows for a trans-national structured and holistic security-risk-management approach for owners and operators of road infrastructures in Europe. This paper presents the developed methodology starting from the assessment procedures of a network's criticality over an object's attractiveness and vulnerability to the selection process of appropriate protection measures.
Improving the security of critical road infrastructure is a major task for owners and operators of tunnels and bridges in the European TEN-T Network (Trans-European Networks of Transport) (European Parliament and Council 1996). Up to now, there has not been a systematic procedure for identifying and assessing critical infrastructure objects and selecting appropriate protection measures. The EC FP7 project SeRoN for the first time presents an innovative methodology in order to support road owners and operators in handling this complex task. This paper describes the methodology and project results in detail by giving an introduction into its practical application.
This thesis gives a detailed picture of how planners, politicians, residents and transport engineers in three societies, Britain, Germany and the United States reacted to one of the most powerful inventions of the late nineteenth century, the motor car. Misjudgments of the potential growth of motor vehicle ownership and its adverse effects had serious repercussions in the coming decades, primarily in the dense urban areas. Disturbing has been the underestimation of the importance of public transport as a real alternative to the motor car in urban areas, first by the United States and even several decades later by Britain. Of the three countries, only Germany seems to have struck a better balance. Not surprisingly, already at the beginning of the twentieth century, conflicts occurred between the weaker road participants (pedestrians and cyclists), the existing urban fabric and the motor vehicle. A more comprehensive comparison between Britain and Germany shows that both countries developed specific patterns and had different attitudes towards road transport. Far more has been invested and planned in Germany whereas Britain has shown not so much a lack of foresight in planning but 'in investment in road transport. This major difference has had very visible effects an today's urban structure and transport situation. The demand for restraint of motor traffic had different motives in the two countries, and is not such a new idea as is often assumed. While in Germany even in the 1920s and 30s the protection of historic inheritance was a decisive motive, in Britain that was not the case. Questions of traffic restraint were however raised in connection with road safety and later in the 60s as a means of improving the urban environment. The turning point of nearly unlimited promotion of car use in urban areas took place in Germany during the 60s and 70s, whereas the Buchanan Report had already warned in the early 60s against the adverse effects cars could have in urban areas if they were not controlled. Although even in Britain the report was misunderstood and largely not put into practice, the wave of protest against road building occurred earlier there than in Germany. As a whole, Britain has shown a brillance of ideas in restraining motor vehicles which was lacking in the Federal Republic. At the beginning of the 70s, discussions started seriously in Germany an traffic calming concepts which were slowly transformed into reality, Britain seems to have followed these examples, but with a considerable time lag.
Despite the steadily declining number of pedestrian fatalities and injuries in most European countries during recent decades, pedestrian protection is still of great importance in the European Union as well as in Germany. This is because they still constitute a large proportion of road user casualties and are more likely to suffer serious and fatal injuries than most other road users. In 1999 only car occupants suffered more fatal injuries than pedestrians in Germany. In December 1998, EEVC WG 17 completed their review and updating of the EEVC WG 10 pedestrian test procedure that made it possible to evaluate the protection afforded to pedestrians by the front of passenger cars in an accident. Within the scope of this procedure, four different impactors are used representing those parts of the body which are injured very often and/or very seriously in vehicle-pedestrian-collisions. In a project executed by IKA and BASt, a small family car was tested according to the EEVC WG 17 test procedure. Afterwards modifications to the car were carried out in order to improve the pedestrian protection provided by the vehicle design. There were certain restrictions placed on the level of modifications undertaken, e.g. only minor modifications to vehicle styling and to the vehicle structures, which provide passenger protection. The redesigned vehicle was tested again using the WG 17 test procedure. The test results of the modified vehicle were compared with those of the standard vehicle and evaluated. The results show that considered measures for pedestrian protection in many areas of the vehicle front structure and the use of innovative techniques can lead to a significant reduction of the loads of pedestrians at an acceptable expense.
An approach to the standardization of accident and injury registration systems (STAIRS) in Europe
(1998)
STAIRS is a European Commission funded study whose aim is to produce a set of guidelines for a harmonised, crash injury database. The need to evaluate the effectiveness of the forthcoming European Union front and side impact directives has emphasised the need for real world crash injury data-sets that can be representative of the crash population throughout Europe. STAIRS will provide a methodology to achieve this. The ultimate aim of STAIRS is to produce a set of data collection tools which will aid decision making on vehicle crashworthiness as well as providing a means to evaluate the effectiveness of safety regulations. This paper will disseminate the up-to-date findings of the group as they try to harmonise their methods. The stage has been reached where studies into the diverse methods of the UK, French and German systems of crash injury investigation have been undertaken. An assessment has already been made of the relationships between the three current systems in order to define the areas of agreement and divergence. The conclusions reached stated that there were many areas that are already closely related and that the differences were only at the detailed level. With the emphasis on secondary safety and injury causation, core data sets were decided upon, taking into account: vehicle description, collision configuration, structural response of vehicles, restraint and airbag performance, child restraint performance, Euro NCAP, pedestrian and vehicle occupant kinematics, injury description and causation. Each variable was studied objectively, the important elements isolated and developed into a form that all partners were agreeable on. A glossary of terms is being developed as the project progresses which includes ISO standards and other definitions from the associated CAREPLUS project, which addresses the comparability of national data sets. A major consideration of the group was the data collection method to be employed. The strengths and weaknesses of each study were investigated to obtain a clear idea of which aspects offered the best way forward. The quality of this information and transference into a common format, as well as the necessary error checking systems to be employed have just been completed and are described. In tandem with this area of study the problem of the statistical relationship of each sample to the national population is also being investigated. The study proposes a mechanism to use a sample of crash injury data to represent the national and international crash injury problem
A means of assessing the passive safety of automobiles is a desirable instrument for legislative bodies, the automobile industry, and the consumer. As opposed to the dominating motor vehicle assessment criteria, such as engine power, spaciousness, aerodynamics and consumption, there are no clear and generally accepted criteria for assessing the passive safety of cars. The proposed method of assessment combines the results of experimental safety tests, carried out according to existing legally prescribed or currently discussed testing conditions, and a biomechanical validation of the loading values determined in the test. This evaluation is carried out with the aid of risk functions which are specified for individual parts of the body by correlating the results of accident analysis with those obtained by computer simulation. The degree of conformance to the respective protection criterion thus deduced is then weighted with factors which take into account the frequency of occurrence and the severity of the accident on the basis of resulting costs. Each of the test series includes at least two frontal and one lateral crash test against a deformable barrier. The computer-aided analysis and evaluation of the simulation results enables a vehicle-specific overall safety index as well as partial and individual safety values to be determined and plotted graphically. The passive safety provided by the respective vehicle under test can be defined for specific seating positions, special types of accident, or for individual endangered parts of the body.
This paper provides an overview of the research work of the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) in the field of crash compatibility between passenger cars. Since July 1997 the EC Commission is partly funding the research work of EEVC. The running period of this project will be two years. The progress of five working packages of this research project is presented: Literature review, Accident analysis, Structural survey of cars, Crash testing, and Mathematical modelling. According to the planned time schedule the progress of research work is different for the five working packages.
Side-impact safety of passenger cars is assessed in Europe in a full-scale test using a moving barrier. The front of this barrier is deformable and represents the stiffness of an 'average' car. The EU Directive 96/27/EC on side impact protection has adopted the EEVC Side Impact Test Procedure, including the original performance specification for the barrier face when impacting a flat dynamometric rigid wall. The requirements of the deformable barrier face, as laid down in the Directive, are related to geometrical characteristics, deformation characteristics and energy dissipation figures. Due to these limited requirements, many variations are possible in designing a deformable barrier face. As a result, several barrier face designs are in the market. However, research institutes and car manufacturers report significant difference in test results when using these different devices. It appears that the present approval test is not able to distinguish between the different designs that may perform differently when they impact real vehicles. Therefore, EEVC Working Group 13 has developed a number of tests to evaluate the different designs. In these tests the barrier faces are loaded and deformed in a specific and/or more representative way. Barrier faces of different design have been evaluated. In the paper the set-up and the reasoning behind the tests is presented. Results showing specific differences in performance are demonstrated.