Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (97)
- Buch (Monographie) (49)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (45)
- Arbeitspapier (13)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (5)
Sprache
- Englisch (106)
- Deutsch (101)
- Mehrsprachig (2)
Schlagworte
- Safety (77)
- Sicherheit (76)
- Fahrzeug (57)
- Vehicle (57)
- Bewertung (51)
- Deutschland (46)
- Germany (46)
- Anfahrversuch (45)
- Evaluation (assessment) (45)
- Impact test (veh) (42)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (209) (entfernen)
Regarding to the German road traffic licensing regulations it is mandatory to have a light system using a bicycle in public traffic. All attached components must be approved. The admission requires additional restrictions such as a dynamo as energy source with a nominal voltage of 6 V. Batteries are only allowed in addition to this. To adopt the German bicycle regulation to the state of art of an energy efficient lighting, additional power sources such as a battery respectively rechargeable batterie should be evaluated. The project will propose amendments for German Road Traffic Regulations and technical requirements.
A biofidelic flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been developed from the year 2000 onwards and evaluated by a technical evaluation group (Flex-TEG) of UN-ECE GRSP. A recently established UN-ECE GRSP Informal Group on GTR9 Phase 2 is aiming at introducing the FlexPLI within world-wide regulations on pedestrian safety (Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 as well as the new UN regulation 127 on pedestrian safety) as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents. Besides, the FlexPLI has already been introduced within JNCAP and is on the Euro NCAP roadmap for 2014. Despite of the biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia sections, several open issues related to the FlexPLI, like the estimation of the cost benefit, the feasibility of vehicle compliance with the threshold values, the robustness of the impactor and of the test results, the comparability between prototype and production level and the finalization of certification corridors still needed to be solved. Furthermore, discussions with stakeholders about a harmonized lower legform to bumper test area are still going on. This paper describes several studies carried out by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) regarding the benefit due to the introduction of the FlexPLI within legislation for type approval, the robustness of test results, the establishment of new assembly certification corridors and a proposal for a harmonized legform to bumper test area. Furthermore, a report on vehicle tests that previously had been carried out with three prototype legforms and were now being repeated using legforms with serial production status, is given. Finally, the paper gives a status report on the ongoing simulation and testing activities with respect to the development and evaluation of an improved test procedure with upper body mass for assessing pedestrian femur injuries.
For a number of EU regulatory acts Virtual Testing (VT) is already allowed for type approval (see Commission Regulation No. 371/2010 of 16 April 2010 amending the Framework Directive 2007/46/EC). However, only a very general procedure on how to apply VT for type approval is provided. Technical details for specific regulatory acts are not given yet. The main objective of the European project IMVITER (IMplementation of VIrtual TEsting in Safety Regulations) was to promote the implementation of VT in safety regulations. When proposing VT procedures the new regulation was taken into account, in particular, addressing open issues. Special attention was paid to pedestrian protection as pilot cases. A key aspect for VT implementation is to demonstrate that the employed simulation models are reliable. This paper describes how the Verification and Validation (V&V) method defined by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers was adapted for pedestrian protection VT based assessment. or the certification of headform impactors an extensive study was performed at two laboratories to assess the variability in calibration tests and equivalent results from a set of simulation models. Based on these results a methodology is defined for certification of headform impactor simulation models. A similar study was also performed with one vehicle in the type approval test setup. Its bonnet was highly instrumented and subjected to 45 impacts in five different positions at two laboratories in order to obtain an estimation of the variability in the physical tests. An equivalent study was performed using stochastic simulation with a metamodel fed with observed variability in impact conditions of physical headforms. An estimation of the test method uncertainty was obtained and used in the definition of a validation corridor for simulation models. Validation metric and criteria were defined in cooperation with the ISO TC22 SC10 and SC12 WG4 "Virtual Testing". A complete validation procedure including different test setups, physical magnitudes and evaluation criteria is provided. A detailed procedural flowchart is developed for VT implementation in EC Regulation No 78/2009 based on a so called "Hybrid VT" approach, which combines real hardware based head impact tests and simulations. This detailed flowchart is shown and explained within this paper. Another important point within the virtual testing based procedures is the documentation of relevant information resulting from the verification and validation process of the numerical models used. For this purpose report templates were developed within the project. The proposed procedure fixes minimum V&V requirements for numerical models to be confidently used within the type-approval process. It is not intended to be a thorough guide on how to build such reliable models. Different modeling methodologies are therefore possible, according to particular OEM know-how. These requirements respond to a balance amongst the type-approval stakeholders interests. A cost-benefit analysis, which was also performed within the IMVITER project, supports this approach, showing the conditions in which VT implementation is beneficial. Based on the experience gained in the project and the background of the experts involved an outlook is given as a roadmap of VT implementation, identifying the most important milestones to be reached along the way to a future vehicle type approval procedure supported by VT. The results presented in this paper show an important step addressing open questions and fostering the future acceptance of virtual testing in pedestrian protection type approval procedures.
A series of drop tests and vehicle tests with the adult head impactor according to Regulation (EC) 631/2009 and drop tests with the phantom head impactor according to UN Regulation No. 43 have been carried out by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development (BMVBS). Aim of the test series was to study the injury risk for vulnerable road users, especially pedestrians, in case of being impacted by a motor vehicle in a way described within the European Regulations (EC) 78/2009 and (EC) 631/2009. Furthermore, the applicability of the phantom head drop test described in UN Regulation No. 43 for plastic glazing should be investigated. In total, 30 drop tests, thereof 18 with the adult head impactor and 12 with the phantom head impactor, and 49 vehicle tests with the adult head impactor were carried out on panes of laminated safety glass (VSG), polycarbonate (PC) and laminated polycarbonate (L-PC). The influence of parameters such as the particular material properties, test point locations, fixations, ambient conditions (temperature and impact angle) was investigated in detail. In general, higher values of the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) were observed in tests on polycarbonate glazing. As the HIC is the current criterion for the assessment of head injury risk, polycarbonate glazing has to be seen as more injurious in terms of vulnerable road user protection. In addition, the significantly higher rebound of the head observed in tests with polycarbonate glazing is suspected to lead to higher neck loads and may also cause higher injury risks in secondary impacts of vulnerable road users. However, as in all tests with PC glazing no damage of the panes was observed, the risk of skin cut injuries may be expected to be reduced significantly. The performed test series give no indication for the test procedure prescribed in UN Regulation No. 43 as a methodology to approve glass windscreen not being feasible for polycarbonate glazing, as all PC panes tested fulfilled the UN R 43 requirements. The performance of the windscreen area will not be relevant for vehicle type approval according to the upcoming UN Regulation for pedestrian protection. However, it is recommended that pedestrian protection being considered for plastic windscreens to ensure at least the same level of protection as glass windscreens.
Recent accident statistics from the German national database state bicyclists being the second endangered group of vulnerable road users besides pedestrians. With 399 fatalities, more than 14.000 seriously injured and more than 61.000 slightly injured persons on german roads in the year 2011, the group of bicyclists is ranked second of all road user groups (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2012). While the overall bicycle helmet usage frequency in Germany is very low, evidence is given that its usage leads to a significant reduction of severe head injuries. After an estimation of the benefit of bicycle helmet usage as well as an appropriate test procedure for bicyclists, this paper describes two different approaches for the improvement of bicyclist safety. While the first one is focusing on the assessment of the vehicle based protection potential for bicyclists, the second one is concentrating on the safety assessment of bicycle helmets. Within the first part of the study the possible revision of the existing pedestrian testing protocols is being examined, using in depth accident data, full scale simulation and hardware testing. Within the second part of the study, the results of tests according to supplemental test procedures for the safety assessment of bicycle helmets developed by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) are presented. An additional full scale test performed at reduced impact speed proves that measures of active vehicle safety as e.g. braking before the collision event do not necessarily always lead to a reduction of injury severity.
Die Initiative der Einführung kooperativer Systeme in einem Korridor von Rotterdam über Frankfurt/Main nach Wien, dem sogenannten C-ITS Corridor, und damit auch in Deutschland wurde im Juni 2013 durch die Unterzeichnung einer entsprechenden Absichtserklärung des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung mit den Verkehrsministern der Niederlande und Österreichs offiziell gestartet. In vielen Forschungsprojekten wurden vorher die Grundlagen erarbeitet, um eine solche Einführung technisch überhaupt erst möglich zu machen. Im Beitrag werden diese Ergebnisse nochmals kurz aufgegriffen und um den aktuellen Stand bei den Entwicklungen im C-ITS Corridor erweitert. Als erstes Einführungsszenario wurden die Baustellenwarnung und Kooperatives Verkehrsmanagement unter Einbeziehung von Fahrzeugdaten gewählt. Nicht verschwiegen werden sollen hierbei auch die wesentlichen Herausforderungen, die im Übergang von Forschung und Feldtests zu realen Anwendungen liegen.
The goal of the project FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) was to define an integrated set of test procedures and associated metrics to assess a vehicle's frontal impact protection, which includes self- and partner-protection. For the development of the set, two different full-width tests (full-width deformable barrier [FWDB] test, full-width rigid barrier test) and three different offset tests (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test, progressive deformable barrier [PDB] test, moveable deformable barrier with the PDB barrier face [MPDB] test) have been investigated. Different compatibility assessment procedures were analysed and metrics for assessing structural interaction (structural alignment, vertical and horizontal load spreading) as well as several promising metrics for the PDB/MPDB barrier were developed. The final assessment approach consists of a combination of the most suitable full-width and offset tests. For the full-width test (FWDB), a metric was developed to address structural alignment based on load cell wall information in the first 40 ms of the test. For the offset test (ODB), the existing ECE R94 was chosen. Within the paper, an overview of the final assessment approach for the frontal impact test procedures and their development is given.
Müdigkeit am Steuer ist eine bedeutsame Ursache von Straßenverkehrsunfällen. Es steht eine Fülle unterschiedlicher Methoden zur Verfügung, um Müdigkeit beim Fahrer zu erkennen. Ziel des vorliegenden Projekts war es, auf Basis einer mehrstufigen Befragung von zwölf Experten aus Industrie- und Hochschulforschung die Stärken und Schwächen der derzeit validesten objektiven Müdigkeitsmessverfahren vergleichend zu beschreiben. Als Basis der Bewertung diente ein eigens erarbeiteter Gütekriterienkatalog. Zu den validesten Müdigkeitsmessverfahren gehören aus Expertensicht Lenkverhalten und Spurhaltung, Indikatoren des Lidschlussverhaltens und des EEG, das videobasierte Expertenrating sowie der kontrovers diskutierte Pupillografische Schläfrigkeitstest. Die Güteprofile der sechs ausgewählten Messverfahren werden aufgeführt. Je nach Einsatzgebiet sind alle ausgewählten Messverfahren (Forschung und Entwicklung), nur einige (Müdigkeitswarnsystem im Fahrzeug), oder kein einziges (Verkehrskontrolle) geeignet. Dem Urteil der Experten nach bedarf eine valide Müdigkeitserfassung der Kombination von mindestens zwei Messverfahren unter Berücksichtigung der spezifischen Stärke-Schwächenprofile.
The off-set assessment procedure potentially contributes to the FIMCAR objectives to maintain the compartment strength and to assess load spreading in frontal collisions. Furthermore it provides the opportunity to assess the restraint system performance with different pulses if combined with a full-width assessment procedure in the frontal assessment approach. Originally it was expected that the PDB assessment procedure would be selected for the FIMCAR assessment approach. However, it was not possible to deliver a compatibility metric in time so that the current off-set procedure (ODB as used in UNECE R94) with some minor modifications was proposed for the FIMCAR Assessment Approach. Nevertheless the potential to assess load spreading, which appears not to be possible with any other assessed frontal impact assessment procedure was considered to be still high. Therefore the development work for the PDB assessment procedure did not stop with the decision not to select the PDB procedure. As a result of the decisions to use the current ODB and to further develop the PDB procedure, both are covered within this deliverable. The deliverable describes the off-set test procedure that will be recommended by FIMCAR consortium, this corresponds to the ODB test as it is specified in UN-ECE Regulation 94 (R94), i.e. EEVC deformable element with 40% overlap at a test speed of 56 km/h. In addition to the current R94 requirements, FIMCAR will recommend to introduce some structural requirements which will guarantee sufficiently strong occupant compartments by enforcing the stability of the forward occupant cell. With respect to the PDB assessment procedure a new metric, Digital Derivative in Y direction - DDY, was developed, described, analysed, and compared with other metrics. The DDY metric analyses the deformation gradients laterally across the PDB face. The more even the deformation, the lower the DDY values and the better the metric- result. In order analyse the different metrics, analysis of the existing PDB test results and the results of the performed simulation studies was performed. In addition, an assessment of artificial deformation profiles with the metrics took place. This analysis shows that there are still issues with the DDY metric but it appears that it is possible to solve them with future optimisations. For example the current metric assesses only the area within 60% of the half vehicle width. For vehicles that have the longitudinals further outboard, the metric is not effective. In addition to the metric development, practical issues of the PDB tests such as the definition of a scan procedure for the analysis of the deformation pattern including the validation of the scanning procedure by the analysis of 3 different scans at different locations of the same barrier were addressed. Furthermore the repeatability and reproducibility of the PDB was analysed. The barrier deformation readings seem to be sensitive with respect to the impact accuracy. In total, the deliverable is meant to define the FIMCAR off-set assessment procedure and to be a starting point for further development of the PDB assessment procedure.
The objective of this deliverable is to describe the expected influence of the candidate test procedures developed in FIMCAR for frontal impact on other impact types. The other impact types of primary interest are front-to-side impacts, collisions with road restraint systems (e.g. guardrails), and heavy goods vehicle impacts. These collision types were chosen as they involve structures that can be adapted to improve safety. Collisions with vulnerable road users (VRU) were not explicitly investigated in FIMCAR. It is expected that the vehicle structures of interest in FIMCAR can be designed into a VRU friendly shell. Information used for this deliverable comes from simulations and car-to-car crash tests conducted in FIMCAR or review of previous research. Three test configurations (full width, offset, and moving deformable barriers) were the input to the FIMCAR selection process. There are three different types of offset tests and two different full width tests. During the project test procedures could be divided into three groups that provide different influences or outcomes on vehicle designs: 1. The ODB barrier provides a method to assess part of the vehicles energy absorption capabilities and compartment test in one test. 2. The FWRB and FWDB have similar capabilities to control structural alignment, further assess energy absorption capabilities, and promote the improvements in the occupant restraint system for high deceleration impacts. 3. The PDB and MPDB can be used to promote better load spreading in the vehicle structures, in addition to assessing energy absorption and occupant compartment strength in an offset configuration. The consortium selected the ODB and FWDB as the two best candidates for short term application in international rulemaking. The review of how all candidates would affect vehicle performance in other impacts (beside front-to-front vehicle or frontal impacts with fixed obstacles) however is reported in this deliverable to support the benefit analysis reported in FIMCAR. The grouping presented above is used to discuss all five test candidates using similarities between certain tests and thereby simplify the discussion.
The objectives of the FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) project are to answer the remaining open questions identified in earlier projects (such as understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of force based metrics and barrier deformation based metrics, confirmation of specific compatibility issues such as structural interaction, investigation of force matching) and to finalise the frontal impact test procedures required to assess compatibility. Research strategies and priorities were based on earlier research programs and the FIMCAR accident data analysis. The identified real world safety issues were used to develop a list of compatibility characteristics which were then prioritised within the consortium. This list was the basis for evaluating the different test candidates. This analysis resulted in the combination of the Full Width Deformable Barrier test (FWDB) with compatibility metrics and the existing Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) as described in UN-ECE Regulation 94 with additional cabin integrity requirement as being proposed as the FIMCAR assessment approach. The proposed frontal impact assessment approach addresses many of the issues identified by the FIMCAR consortium but not all frontal impact and compatibility issues could be addressed.
Road markings are an essential component of a safe road. In particular, the optical guidance at night and under wet conditions rates high. Special surface textures of road markings can enhance the nighttime visibility during wetness, but they can lead on the other hand to noise emission during passages of vehicles and thus annoy residents. In the present study the tyre/road marking noise is analysed based on two different measurement methods for traffic noise: Several different road markings with increased nighttime visibility during wetness were overrun and the noise was determined by controlled coast-by measurements as well as close-proximity measurements. For both measuring methods the averaged A-weighted sound pressure levels were determined and an analysis of the third octave spectra was performed in order to identify annoying tonal components. The results of both measurement methods were compared with each other. Limitations of the individual measurement methods were overcome by combining the data. Properties of road marking noise depending on the texture of the marking are discussed in relation to those of road surface noise. The results will help specifying road marking texture types that ensure less annoyance and at the same time good visibility at wetness and night-time.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were to review existing full-width test procedures and their discussed compatibility metrics, to report recent activities and findings with respect to full-width assessment procedures and to assess test procedures and metrics. Starting with a review of previous work, candidate metrics and associated performance limits to assess a vehicle- structural interaction potential, in particular its structural alignment, have been developed for both the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB) and Full Width Rigid Barrier (FWRB) tests. Initial work was performed to develop a concept to assess a vehicle- frontal force matching. However, based on the accident analyses performed within FIMCAR frontal force matching was not evaluated as a first priority and thus in line with FIMCAR strategy the focus was put on the development of metrics for the assessment of structural interaction which was evaluated as a first priority.
Accident analysis
(2014)
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the EC funded FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in today- research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The specific objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were: - Determine if previously identified compatibility issues are still relevant in current vehicle fleet: Structural interaction, Frontal force matching, Compartment strength in particular for light cars. - Determine nature of injuries and injury mechanisms: Body regions injured o Injury mechanism: Contact with intrusion, Contact, Deceleration / restraint induced. The main data sources for this report were the CCIS and Stats 19 databases from Great Britain and the GIDAS database from Germany. The different sampling and reporting schemes for the detailed databases (CCIS & GIDAS) sometimes do not allow for direct comparisons of the results. However the databases are complementary " CCIS captures more severe collisions highlighting structure and injury issues while GIDAS provides detailed data for a broader range of crash severities. The following results represent the critical points for further development of test procedures in FIMCAR.
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and the final report to the steering committee on frontal impact [Faerber 2007] and the FP5 VC-COMPAT[Edwards 2007] project activities, two test approaches were identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis will be performed. In the FIMCAR Deliverable D 3.1 [Adolph 2013] the development and assessment of criteria and associated performance limits for the full width test procedure were reported. In this Deliverable D3.2 analyses of the test data (full width tests, car-to-car tests and component tests), further development and validation of the full width assessment protocol and development of the load cell and load cell wall specification are reported. The FIMCAR full-width assessment procedure consists of a 50 km/h test against the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB). The Load Cell Wall behind the deformable element assesses whether or not important Energy Absorbing Structures are within the Common Interaction Zone as defined based on the US part 581 zone. The metric evaluates the row forces and requires that the forces directly above and below the centre line of the Common Interaction Zone exceed a minimum threshold. Analysis of the load spreading showed that metrics that rely on sum forces of rows and columns are within acceptable tolerances. Furthermore it was concluded that the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the FWDB test is acceptable. The FWDB test was shown to be capable to detect lower load paths that are beneficial in car-to-car impacts.
In the European Project FIMCAR, a proposal for a frontal impact test configuration was developed which included an additional full width deformable barrier (FWDB) test. Motivation for the deformable element was partly to measure structural forces as well as to produce a severe crash pulse different from that in the offset test. The objective of this study was to analyze the safety performance of vehicles in the full width rigid barrier test (FWRB) and in the full width deformable barrier test (FWDB). In total, 12 vehicles were crashed in both configurations. Comparison of these tests to real world accident data was used to identify the crash barrier most representative of real world crashes. For all vehicles, the airbag visible times were later in the FWDB configuration. This was attributed to the attenuation of the initial acceleration peak, observed in FWRB tests, by the addition of the deformable element. These findings were in alignment with airbag triggering times seen in real world crash data. Also, the dummy loadings were slightly worse in FWDB compared to FWRB tests, which is possibly linked to the airbag firing and a more realistic loading of the vehicle crash structures in the FWDB configuration. Evaluations of the lower extremities have shown a general increasing of the tibia index with the crash pulse severity.
Es wird zunächst eine Übersicht über typische Systembausteine und wesentliche Akteure für den Betrieb Intelligenter Verkehrssysteme (IVS) in Deutschland gegeben. Unter Verwendung der IVS-Systembausteine werden für die vier Systemsparten Intelligenter Verkehrssysteme - die Straßenverkehrstelematik, - die Verkehrsinformationsdienste, - die autonomen Fahrerassistenzsysteme und - die kooperativen Systeme einfache funktionale Anwendungsbeispiele skizziert und analysiert. Die Anwendungsbeispiele bilden den Ausgangspunkt für eine Rekombination der Systembausteine. Die so erreichte Auflösung der Systemgrenzen hin zur Modularisierung der einzelnen Szenarien liefert eine Vielzahl neuer Kombinationsmöglichkeiten der identifizierten Bausteine intelligenter Verkehrssysteme in einer Matrix. Der vorliegende Bericht verdeutlicht und veranschaulicht die Potenziale dieses Baukastens, benennt außerdem aber auch die noch zu bewältigenden Herausforderungen im organisatorischen, funktionalen und technischen Bereich. Der Bericht ist als Grundlagenarbeit zu verstehen, die in eine Vielzahl weiterführender Aktivitäten in Deutschland als harmonisierte Analyse eingeflossen ist und noch einfließen wird.
Rastanlagen an BAB - Verbesserung der Auslastung und Erhöhung der Kapazität durch Telematiksysteme
(2014)
Erhebungen im Auftrag des damaligen Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS) im März 2008 belegten, dass auf und an den Bundesautobahnen etwa 14.000 Lkw-Parkstände fehlen. Neben der baulichen Schaffung neuer Parkstandkapazitäten fördert das Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (BMVI) auch den Einsatz telematischer Systeme zur besseren Auslastung und Kapazitätserhöhung auf Rastanlagen. Auch aufgrund unregelmäßiger Nachfrage ist ein Verteilen der Nachfrage innerhalb eines Streckenabschnitts erforderlich. Dies kann durch den Einsatz von Telematik geleistet werden. Zur Ermittlung der Belegung der Rastanlagen auf einem Streckenabschnitt werden diese mit Detektionstechnik ausgerüstet. Die detektierten Daten über die Belegung von Lkw-Parkständen werden zu Informationen aufbereitet. Diese Parkinformationen können über verschiedene Kommunikationswege (z. B. über elektronische Anzeigen an der Autobahn oder das Internet) den Lkw-Fahrern sowie den Logistikunternehmen übermittelt werden. Für die Güterverkehrsbranche bedeutet dies eine verbesserte Planbarkeit der Lenk- und Ruhezeiten der Lkw-Fahrer. Gleichzeitig soll mittels Parkinformationen eine gleichmäßigere Auslastung des Parkangebots an Bundesautobahnen (BAB) erzielt und somit das Auftreten gefährlicher Situationen durch verkehrsgefährdend abgestellte Fahrzeuge in den Zufahrten von Rastanlagen verhindert werden. Insgesamt ist somit von einer Erhöhung der Sicherheit für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer auf den BAB auszugehen. Bewährte Detektoren, wie Induktivschleifen, stehen auf Rastanlagen vor neuen Herausforderungen. Hierfür bedurfte es neuer technischer Entwicklungen, welche die besonderen Randbedingungen auf einer Rastanlage und die Anforderungen an die Informationsqualität von Parkinformationen berücksichtigen. Neue Detektoren wurden im Rahmen von Pilotprojekten der Bundesländer erprobt. Die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) hat die Pilotprojekte unter wissenschaftlichen Gesichtspunkten mit dem Fokus einer zukünftigen Evaluierung begleitet. Dazu wurde ein einheitliches Bewertungsverfahren für Telematiksysteme auf Rastanlagen entwickelt. Das Bewertungsverfahren erlaubt - im Gegensatz zu Prüfungen gemäß Technischen Lieferbedingungen für Streckenstationen (TLS) -, den Fokus auf die Bewertung des Gesamtkonzeptes zu legen, d. h., das Zusammenspiel aus Detektion, Steuerungsverfahren und Kommunikation zum Verkehrsteilnehmer kann systematisch analysiert werden. Ergebnis bisheriger Tätigkeiten der BASt ist weiterhin die Entwicklung eines neuen Steuerungsverfahrens "Kompaktparken", welches das vorhandene Spektrum telematischer Systeme auf Rastanlagen sinnvoll ergänzt. Kompaktparken basiert auf der Idee, durch zeitliches Sortieren mehr parkende Fahrzeuge auf der Rastanlage zu platzieren, die Flächen von Fahrgassen einzusparen und geordnetes, sicheres Parken zu unterstützen. Als Koordinierungsstelle der deutschen Location Code List und Mitglied in der internationalen Traveller Information Services Association (TISA) unterstützt die BASt die Weiterentwicklung von Diensten zur Bereitstellung von Parkinformationen in die Fahrzeuge. Der vorliegende Bericht fasst den Stand der gewonnenen Erkenntnisse über Maßnahmen zur Auslastung und Erhöhung der Kapazität von Rastanlagen an BAB zusammen. Der Bericht basiert auf Literaturrecherchen, eigenen Untersuchungen und Tätigkeiten der BASt sowie Gesprächen mit Betreibern und Anbietern telematischer Systeme für Rastanlagen. Zunächst werden die derzeit eingesetzten Techniken für Detektion und Kommunikation sowie Steuerungsverfahren vorgestellt. Ergänzend werden mögliche, bislang noch nicht für das telematische Lkw-Parken eingesetzte Techniken betrachtet. Darauf aufbauend wurde ein Konzept entwickelt, wie zukünftig eine intelligente Streckensteuerung wirken kann. Diese soll im Gegensatz zu Parkinformationen für einzelne Rastanlagen die Belegung mehrerer Rastanlagen eines Streckenabschnitts berücksichtigen und Parkempfehlungen für die Nutzer ermöglichen. Dazu wird vom Stand der Technik ausgehend eine mögliche Realisierungsvariante beschrieben und der erforderliche Entwicklungsbedarf aufgezeigt. Vorschläge zur Gestaltung von Parkinformationen runden das Konzept ab. Es ist beabsichtigt, den Bericht im Sinne eines Maßnahmenkataloges mit fortschreitendem Erkenntnisstand zu aktualisieren. Er soll im Besonderen Betreibern und Dienstanbietern Orientierung bei der Systemgestaltung bieten. Gleichzeitig sollen Entwicklungen im Bereich fahrzeugseitiger Parkinformationen angestoßen werden. Das Bewertungsverfahren wiederum soll zukünftig eine vergleichende Bewertung von telematischen Systemen auf Rastanlagen ermöglichen und zu einer kontinuierlichen Verbesserung der Systeme beitragen. Zum Zeitpunkt der Berichtslegung stehen die abschließenden Ergebnisse der einheitlichen Bewertung der Detektoren in den Pilotprojekten aus und sind mit einer Fortschreibung des Berichts zu ergänzen.
Der vom 01.01.2012 bis zum 31.12.2016 andauernde Feldversuch der Bundesregierung mit Lang-Lkw wird durch die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) wissenschaftlich begleitet. Lang-Lkw sind Fahrzeuge und Fahrzeugkombinationen, - die mit bis zu 25,25 m zwar länger als nach den geltenden Regelungen ausgeführt sein dürfen, - im Vergleich zu herkömmlichen Lkw um bis zu 6,50 m länger sind, - aber kein höheres Gesamtgewicht als die auch heute schon geltenden 40 t beziehungsweise 44 t im Vor- und Nachlauf zum Kombinierten Verkehr haben. Im Feldversuch werden die Chancen und Risiken des Einsatzes der Lang-Lkw untersucht. Nach etwa der Hälfte des Feldversuchs wurden die wesentlichen Erkenntnisse aus dem bisherigen Untersuchungszeitraum in einem Zwischenbericht von der BASt zusammengefasst und bewertet. Der Zwischenbericht der BASt gliedert sich thematisch und enthält neben den für die Konzeption der Gesamtuntersuchung erforderlichen rechtlichen Grundlagen und vorliegenden Erkenntnissen aus der Literatur insbesondere die Zusammenfassungen verschiedener Forschungsprojekte zu den hinsichtlich des Einsatzes von Lang-Lkw relevanten Fragestellungen. Die Teilprojekte, die von externen Forschungsnehmern bearbeitet wurden, sind als selbstständige Publikationen verfügbar. Dort finden sich detailliertere Informationen zu den einzelnen Untersuchungen. Insgesamt galt es herauszuarbeiten, welche Auswirkungen der Einsatz von Lang-Lkw im Vergleich zur Situation ohne Lang-Lkw auf die identifizierten Fragestellungen hat. Zusammenfassend lässt sich feststellen, dass sich neben den festgestellten positiven Effekten, wie einem Effizienzgewinn und der Einsparung von Lkw-Fahrten, gravierende Probleme im Feldversuch unter den gegebenen Randbedingungen bislang nicht gezeigt haben. Gemessen an der Vielzahl betrachteter Fragestellungen ist die Anzahl der identifizierten Risiken gering. Zudem sind die identifizierten Risiken bei der derzeit vorhandenen Anzahl von im Feldversuch beteiligten Lang-Lkw und auch noch unter der Annahme von deutlich höheren Anteilen von Lang-Lkw am Güterverkehrsaufkommen als hinnehmbar oder zumindest beherrschbar einzustufen. Einzig für den Umstand der für Lang-Lkw in der Regel zu kurzen Schrägparkstände auf Rastanlagen müssten bei einer steigenden Anzahl an Lang-Lkw Lösungsansätze entwickelt werden, um das regelkonforme Abstellen der Lang-Lkw auch auf Rastanlagen weiterhin gewährleisten zu können. Zu beachten ist hinsichtlich der Gesamteinschätzung zudem, dass den erzielten Ergebnissen in der Regel die ganz spezifischen Randbedingungen des Feldversuchs zugrunde liegen. Teilweise resultieren diese Randbedingungen aus den Vorgaben der Ausnahme-Verordnung zum Feldversuch, in Einzelfällen auch aus dem unter Versuchsbedingungen angepassten Verhalten der Lang-Lkw-Fahrer. Sofern sich an diesen Randbedingungen Änderungen einstellen sollten oder die Unternehmen die heute geltenden Freiheitsgrade deutlicher ausnutzen, sind gewisse Fragestellungen neu zu beleuchten. Somit zeigt der Zwischenbericht in seinem Fazit zusammenfassend auf, dass an einzelnen Punkten weiter Forschungsbedarf besteht. Bis zum Ende des Feldversuchs wird die BASt diesen Fragen nachgehen und Nacherhebungen zur Validierung der bisherigen Ergebnisse durchführen können.