91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (109)
- Buch (Monographie) (60)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (5)
- Bericht (5)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (3)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (89)
- Germany (89)
- Conference (79)
- Konferenz (78)
- Safety (53)
- Sicherheit (52)
- Research report (45)
- Forschungsbericht (44)
- Bewertung (39)
- Evaluation (assessment) (38)
Institut
- Sonstige (183) (entfernen)
Advancing active safety towards the protection of vulnerable road users: the PROSPECT project
(2017)
Accidents involving Vulnerable Road Users (VRU) are still a very significant issue for road safety. According to the World Health Organisation, pedestrian and cyclist deaths account for more than 25% of all road traffic deaths worldwide. Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems have the potential to improve safety for these VRU groups. The PROSPECT project (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) aims to significantly improve the effectiveness of active VRU safety systems compared to those currently on the market by expanding the scope of scenarios addressed by the systems and improving the overall system performance. The project pursues an integrated approach: Newest available accident data combined with naturalistic observations and HMI guidelines represent key inputs for the system specifications, which form the basis for the system development. For system development, two main aspects are considered: advanced sensor processing with situation analysis, and intervention strategies including braking and steering. All these concepts are implemented in several vehicle prototypes. Special emphasis is put on balancing system performance in critical scenarios and avoiding undesired system activations. For system validation, testing in realistic scenarios will be done. Results will allow the performance assessment of the developed concepts and a cost-benefit analysis. The findings within the PROSPECT project will contribute to the generation of state -of-the-art knowledge, technical innovations, assessment methodologies and tools for advancing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems towards the protection of VRUs. The introduction of a new generation safety system in the market will enhance VRU road safety in 2020-2025, contributing to the "Vision Zero" objective of no fatalities or serious injuries in road traffic set out in the Transport White Paper. Furthermore, the test methodologies and tools developed within the project shall be considered for the New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) future roadmaps, supporting the European Commission goal of halving the road toll in the 2011-2020 timeframe.
The presence and performance of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) has increased over last years. Systems available on the market address also conflicts with vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists. Within the European project PROSPECT (Horizon2020, funded by the EC) improved VRU ADAS systems are developed and tested. However, before determining systems" properties and starting testing, an up-to-date analysis of VRU crashes was needed in order to derive the most important Use Cases (detailed crash descriptions) the systems should address. Besides the identified Accident Scenarios (basic crash descriptions), this paper describes in short the method of deriving the Use Cases for car-to-cyclist crashes. Method Crashes involving one passenger car and one cyclist were investigated in several European crash databases looking for all injury severity levels (slight, severe and fatal). These data sources included European statistics from CARE, data on national level from Germany, Sweden and Hungary as well as detailed accident information from these three countries using GIDAS, the Volvo Cars Cyclist Accident database and Hungarian in-depth accident data, respectively. The most frequent accident scenarios were studied and Use Cases were derived considering the key aspects of these crash situations (e.g., view orientation of the cyclist and the car driver- manoeuvre intention) and thus, form an appropriate basis for the development of Test Scenarios. Results Latest information on car-to-cyclist crashes in Europe was compiled including details on the related crash configurations, driving directions, outcome in terms of injury severity, accident location, other environmental aspects and driver responsibilities. The majority of car-to-cyclist crashes occurred during daylight and in clear weather conditions. Car-to-cyclist crashes in which the vehicle was traveling straight and the cyclist is moving in line with the traffic were found to result in the greatest number of fatalities. Considering also slightly and seriously injured cyclists led to a different order of crash patterns according to the three considered European countries. Finally the paper introduced the Use Cases derived from the crash data analysis. A total of 29 Use Cases were derived considering the group of seriously or fatally injured cyclists and 35 Use Cases were derived considering the group of slightly, seriously or fatally injured cyclists. The highest ranked Use Case describes the collision between a car turning to the nearside and a cyclist riding on a bicycle lane against the usual driving direction. A unified European dataset on car-to-cyclist crash scenarios is not available as the data available in CARE is limited, hence national datasets had to be used for the study and further work will be required to extrapolate the results to a European level. Due to the large number of Use Cases, the paper shows only highest ranked ones.
A reduction of around 48% of all road fatalities was achieved in Europe in the past years including a reduced number of fatalities with an older age. However, among all road fatalities, the proportion of elderly is steadily increasing. In an ageing society, the European (Horizon2020) project SENIORS aims to improve the safe mobility of older road users, who have different transportation habits compared to other age groups. To increase their level of safe mobility by determining appropriate requirements for vehicle safety systems, the characteristics of current road traffic collisions involving the elderly and the injuries that they sustain need to be understood in detail. Hereby, the paper focuses on their traffic participation as pedestrian, cyclist or passenger car occupant. Following a literature review, several national and international crash databases and hospital statistics have been analysed to determine the body regions most frequently and severely injured, specific injuries sustained and types of crashes involved, always comparing older road users (65 years and more) with mid-aged road users (25-64 years). The most important crash scenarios were highlighted. The data sources included European statistics from CARE, data on national level from Germany, Sweden, Italy, United Kingdom and Spain as well as in-depth crash information from GIDAS (Germany), RAIDS (UK), CIREN and NASS-CDS (US). In addition, familiar hospital data from Germany (TraumaRegister DGU-®), Italy (Italian Register of Acute Traumas) and UK hospital statistics (TARN) were included in the study to gain further insight into specific injury patterns. Comprehensive data analyses were performed showing injury patterns of older road users in crashes. When comparing with mid-aged road users, all databases showed that the thorax body region is of particularly high importance for the older car occupant with injury severities of AIS 2 or AIS 3+, whereas the body regions lower extremities, head and thorax need to be considered for the older pedestrians and cyclists. Besides these comparisons, the most frequent and severe top 5 injuries were highlighted per road user group. Further, the most important crash configurations were identified and injury risk functions are provided per age group and road user group. Although several databases have been analysed, the picture on the road safety situation of older road users in Europe was not complete, as only Western European data was available. The linkage between crash data and hospital data could only be made on a general level as their inclusion criteria were quite different.
Supported by field accident data and monitoring results of European Regulation (EC) No. 78/2009, recent plans of the European Commission regarding a way forward to improve passive safety of vulnerable road users include, amongst other things, an extension of the head test area. The inclusion of passive cyclist safety is also being considered by Euro NCAP. Although passenger car to cyclist collisions are often severe and have a significant share within the accident statistics, cyclists are neither considered sufficiently in the legislative nor in the consumer ratings tests. Therefore, a test procedure to assess the protection potential of vehicle fronts in a collision with cyclists has been developed within a current research project. For this purpose, the existing pedestrian head impact test procedures were modified in order to include boundary conditions relevant for cyclists as the second big group of vulnerable road users. Based on an in-depth analysis of passenger car to cyclist accidents in Germany the three most representative accident constellations have been initially defined. The development of the test procedure itself was based on corresponding simulations with representative vehicle and bicycle models. In addition to different cyclist heights, reaching from a 6-year-old child to a 95%-male, also four pedal positions were considered. By reconstruction of a real accident the defined simulation parameters could be validated in advance. The conducted accident kinematics analysis shows for a large portion of the constellations an increased head impact area, which can reach beyond the roof leading edge, as well as high average values for head impact velocity and angle. Based on the simulation data obtained for the different vehicle models, cyclist-specific test parameters for impactor tests have been derived, which have been further examined in the course of head and leg impact tests. In order to study the cyclist accident kinematics under real test conditions, different full scale tests with a Polar-II dummy positioned on a bicycle have been conducted. Overall, the tests showed a good correlation with the simulations and support the defined boundary test conditions. Typical accident scenarios and simulations reveal higher head impact locations, angles and velocities. An extended head impact area with modified test parameters will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users including cyclists. However, due to significantly differing impact kinematics and postures between the lower extremities of pedestrians and cyclists, these injuries cannot be addressed by the means of current test tools such as the flexible pedestrian legform impactor FlexPLI. Based on the findings obtained within the project as well as the existing pedestrian protection requirements a cyclist protection test procedure for use in legislation and consumer test programmes has been developed, whose requirements have been transferred into a corresponding test specification. This specification provides common head test boundary conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, whereby the existing requirements are modified and two parallel test procedures are avoided.
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection based on developments by the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) have been introduced in world-wide regulations and consumer test programmes, with considerable harmonization between these programmes. Nevertheless, latest accident investigations reveal a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads running the risk of not meeting the European Union- goal of halving the number of road fatalities by the year 2020. The branch of external road user safety within the EC-funded research project SENIORS under the HORIZON 2020 framework programme focuses on investigating the benefit of modifications to pedestrian test and assessment procedures and their impactors for vulnerable road users with focus on the elderly. Injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists derived from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) show a trend of AIS 2+ and AIS 3+ injuries getting more relevant for the thorax region in crashes with newer cars (Wisch et al., 2017), while maintaining the relevance for head and lower extremities. Several crash databases from Europe such as GIDAS and the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition (STRADA) also show that head, thorax and lower extremities are the key affected body regions not only for the average population but in particular for the elderly. Therefore, the SENIORS project is focusing on an improvement of currently available impactors and procedures in terms of biofidelity and injury assessment ability towards a better protection of the affected body regions, incorporating previous results from FP 6 project APROSYS and subsequent studies carried out by BASt. The paper describes the overall methodology to develop revised FE impactor models. Matched human body model and impactor simulations against generic test rigs provide transfer functions that will be used for the derivation of impactor criteria from human injury risk functions for the affected body regions. In a later step, the refined impactors will be validated by simulations against actual vehicle front-ends. Prototyping and adaptation of test and assessment procedures as well as an impact assessment will conclude the work of the project at the final stage. The work will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users focusing on the elderly. The use of advanced human body models to develop applicable assessment criteria for the revised impactors is intended to cope with the paucity of actual biomechanical data focusing on elderly pedestrians. In order to achieve optimized results in the future, the improved test methods need to be implemented within an integrated approach, combining active with passive safety measures. In order to address the developments in road accidents and injury patterns of vulnerable road users, established test and assessment procedures need to be continuously verified and, where needed, to be revised. The demographic change as well as changes in the vehicle fleet, leading to a variation of accident scenarios, injury frequencies and injury patterns of vulnerable road users are addressed by the work provided by the SENIORS project, introducing updated impactors for pedestrian test and assessment procedures.
Das Fahren mit Licht am Tag wird seit dem 1. Oktober 2005 vom damaligen Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS) empfohlen. Weiterhin wurde im Februar 2011 auf europäischer Ebene beschlossen, alle neuen Fahrzeugtypen der Fahrzeugklasse M1 (Fahrzeuge zur Personenbeförderung mit vier Rädern und maximal 8 Sitzplätzen außer dem Fahrersitz) sowie der Fahrzeugklasse N1 (Kraftfahrzeuge zur Güterbeförderung mit mindestens vier Rädern und mit einem zulässigen Gesamtgewicht bis zu 3,5 t) mit speziellen Tagfahrleuchten (TFL) auszustatten. Seit August 2012 gilt diese Regelung auch für alle anderen Fahrzeugklassen. Vor dem Hintergrund dieser Entwicklung wird davon ausgegangen, dass sich das Fahren mit Licht am Tag immer weiter verbreitet. Um daraus resultierende Sicherheitsgewinne bewerten zu können, ist eine kontinuierliche Beobachtung der Lichteinschaltquoten am Tag erforderlich. Die Grundidee der kontinuierlichen Erfassung der Lichteinschaltquoten am Tag mit der angewendeten Erhebungsmethodik wird beschrieben. Im Fokus stehen die neuen Qualitätssicherungsmaßnahmen. Abschließend werden die bisher ermittelten Zeitreihen analysiert.
Dieser Schlussbericht bezieht sich sehr eng auf den Vorgängerbericht gleichen Titels. Der damalige Fragebogen wurde im Kern beibehalten, jedoch an die geänderte Frageweise angepasst und um einige vertiefende Zusatzfragen ergänzt. Die damalige Fahrprobe wurde jetzt weggelassen. Die theoretischen psychologischen Fragen zum Lang-Lkw wurden im Vorgängerbericht ausführlich diskutiert und wurden deshalb hier nicht wiederaufgenommen. Der entscheidende Unterschied zwischen der ersten und der zweiten Erhebungsphase besteht darin, dass jetzt ein Zwei-Gruppen-Versuchsplan mit Fahrern von Lang-Lkw und von herkömmlichen Lkw gewählt wurde. Darüber hinaus wurde die Datenbasis mit der Untersuchung von 100 Lang-Lkw- und 102 Lkw-Fahrern wesentlich vergrössert. Von den Lang-Lkw-Fahrern hatten n = 24 schon an der Vorgängeruntersuchung teilgenommen, sodass bei ihnen ein Nachher-Vorher-Vergleich mit abhängigen Daten möglich war. Die damit gegebenen Auswertungsmöglichkeiten haben das Bild über die Psychologie des Lang-Lkw wesentlich erweitert und vertieft. Die Vorteile des Lang-Lkw treten jetzt deutlicher hervor. Die drei Fragenblöcke "Fahreigenschaften/Fahrmanöver", "22 Fahrsituationen" und "Semantisches Differential Fahrerleben" zeigten eine klar "gute" bis "sehr gute" absolute Beurteilung des Lang-Lkw. Die Lkw-Fahrer zeigten vergleichbare Profile, jedoch signifikant um etwa einen viertel bis einen halben Punkt in Richtung "nicht gut" verschoben. Das steht im Gegensatz zu der leichten Verschlechterung des Lang-Lkw gegenüber dem Lkw in den Vergleichsurteilen der Vorgängerstudie. Bei den Vergleichsurteilen sollten jetzt beide Fahrergruppen beide Fahrzeugtypen mental miteinander vergleichen. Die Lang-Lkw-Fahrer zeigten praktisch die gleichen Profile wie früher, allerdings wieder ohne die genannte leichte Verschlechterung. Das spricht für die Stabilität der gemessenen Merkmale und ihre Konstanz über die Zeit. Die Lkw-Fahrer gaben im Schnitt einen halben Punkt in Richtung "schlechter" verschobene Profile an. Man gibt also für den Lang-Lkw ein wesentlich besseres Vergleichsurteil ab, wenn man ihn fährt, als wenn man ihn nicht fährt. Die Verbesserung zeigt sich sogar schon, wenn man sich nur mit ihm beschäftigt. Der Vergleich zwischen beiden Zeitpunkten brachte bei den drei Fragenblöcken für die 24 Personen, die zweimal teilgenommen haben, praktisch identische Profile. Die herausragenden positiven Bewertungsspitzen "Kurvenfahren" und "Kreisverkehr" zeigten sich jedoch bei der zweiten Teilnahme nicht mehr. Auch über alle Teilnehmer der neuen Untersuchung ließ sich keine Auswirkung der Dauer und Intensität der Lkw-Nutzung auf die Beurteilungen zeigen. Über diese Untersuchungsteile hinaus wurde eine Fülle von Details erfragt, deren bloße Aufzählung schon über die Länge dieser Kurzfassung hinausgehen würde. Die größten Herausforderungen wurden beim Parken und Rasten sowie bei Fahrstreifen-Verengungen und -Verschränkungen gesehen, und zwar wiederum von den Lang-Lkw-Fahrern in deutlich geringerem Ausmaß als von den Lkw-Fahrern. Sie erscheinen u. a. durch Baumaßnahmen oder Ummarkierungen behebbar. Andere Herausforderungen werden bei Stau und Straßensperrungen sowie den Einschränkungen für das Überholen gesehen. Für erhöhten Stress auf dem Arbeitsplatz Lang-Lkw finden sich auch jetzt wieder kaum Hinweise. Er wird von den Lang-Lkw-Fahrern als deutlich geringer beurteilt als von den Lkw-Fahrern. Eine Erhöhung der Unfallgefahr für einzelne Gruppen anderer Verkehrsteilnehmer durch die Einführung des Lang-Lkw sehen die Lang-Lkw-Fahrer nicht. Anders die Lkw-Fahrer: das Profil ist bei ihnen um durchschnittlich einen halben Punkt in Richtung "deutlich höher" verschoben. Die Einweisung in den Lang-Lkw dauerte im Durch-schnitt 6 Stunden und wurde von der Hälfte der Fahrer als "sehr hilfreich" empfunden. Verbesserungsvorschläge gehen überwiegend in Richtung "mehr praktisches Üben". Zusammengefasst ist die Sicht- und Erlebnisweise der Lang-Lkw-Fahrer in dieser Folgeuntersuchung klarer, prägnanter und positiver geworden. In der Schlussfrage antworteten 100 % von ihnen zustimmend auf die Frage "Sollte der Lang-Lkw nach der Testphase generell zugelassen werden?", 84 % "Ja, mit weniger Einschränkungen", 16 % "Ja, mit Einschränkungen wie bisher".
Im Rahmen dieses Forschungsvorhabens wurde ein Verfahren entwickelt und validiert, mit dem sich reale Emissionsfaktoren für motorisierte Zweiräder in der Systematik des HBEFA generieren lassen. Das Verfahren basiert auf Fahrzeug-Emissionsmessungen in realen Testzyklen, vermessen am Rollenprüfstand oder auf der Straße, als Eingabe für ein Simulationsmodell. Das Modell erzeugt aus den Messungen Motorkennfelder, in denen die Abgasemissionen und der Kraftstoffverbrauch über normierter Motordrehzahl und normierter Motorleistung abgelegt werden. Für jedes gemessene Kfz ergibt sich ein normiertes Emissions-Motorkennfeld. Aus den einzelnen Kennfeldern können dann Durchschnittskennfelder je Fahrzeugkategorie (z.B. Motorrad über 500ccm, EURO 3) gebildet werden. Die Motordrehzahl muss in den Emissionstests entweder gemessen, oder aus Geschwindigkeit, Gang, Reifenumfang und Übersetzungen berechnet werden. Die Motorleistung kann mittels gemessenem CO2-Massenstrom und der Drehzahl aus "generischen CO2-Kennfeldern" ermittelt werden, da im Allgemeinen keine gemessene Leistung vorliegt. Um mit dem Modell dann Emissionsfaktoren für beliebige Fahrzyklen zu bestimmen, wird die Motorleistung aus der Fahrzeuglängsdynamik, den Verlusten im Antriebstrang und dem Leistungsbedarf von Nebenaggregaten aus dem jeweils vorgegebenen Geschwindigkeits- und Steigungsverlauf berechnet. Zur Bestimmung der Drehzahl wird zuerst ein passender Gang berechnet und dann aus den Übersetzungen die Motordrehzahl. Steht die geforderte Motorleistung in keinem Gang zur Verfügung, wird die Beschleunigung im betroffenen Zeitschritt so reduziert, dass sich ein Volllastbetrieb ergibt. Die Berechnungen erfolgen in 1Hz Auflösung. Für jede Sekunde werden dann aus dem zugehörigen Motorkennfeld die Emissionen entsprechend der Drehzahl und Leistung interpoliert. Die integrierten Emissionswerte über den Zyklus ergeben die Summenemissionen, die Division durch die zurückgelegte Strecke die Emissionsfaktoren in g/km. Die Methode wurde im Simulationsprogramm PHEM implementiert. Da PHEM bereits in einem ähnlichen Verfahren Emissionsfaktoren für PKW, LNF und SNF berechnet, war der Zusatzaufwand zum Einbau von Zweirädern nieder und alle Zusatzfunktionen von PHEM können auch für Zweiräder verwendet werden (z.B. Dynamikkorrekturen, automatisierte CO2-basierte Kennfelderzeugung, Batch-Modus, etc.). In dem Projekt wurde die Modellentwicklung und Validierung anhand von 4 gemessenen Zweirädern durchgeführt. Die Tests umfassten Abgasmessungen auf einem Rollenprüfstand sowie On-Road-Messungen mittels PEMS. Die Messkampagne wurde auch genutzt, um einen Vorschlag für ein einheitliches Minimalmessprogramm zur Bestimmung von Emissionsfaktoren von Zweirädern zu erarbeiten. Dazu wurden umfangreiche Fahrversuche im realen Betrieb durchgeführt, die gemessenen Zyklen in Teilstücke verschiedener Verkehrssituationen unterteilt und je Verkehrssituation ein repräsentatives Teilstück bestimmt. Diese wurden dann zu "Real World Rollenzyklen" zusammengefügt. Bei einem Motorradzyklus ist auch ein sportlicher Fahranteil mit Steigung enthalten. Damit ist sichergestellt, dass die Motorkennfelder mit diesen Rollentests gut abgedeckt sind und bei der Berechnung von Emissionsfaktoren keine Extrapolationen von Emissionswerten erforderlich sind. Die am Markt befindlichen PEMS Systeme sind für die Verwendung bei Zweirädern wegen deren Gewicht und Baugröße nicht für alle Fahrzeuge geeignet. PEMS Messungen sind vorerst nur bei größeren Motorrädern im realen Verkehr möglich. Die Emissionskennfelder enthalten jeweils CO, CO2, NOx, HC sowie optional auch die vom FTIR gemessenen Komponenten und Partikelanzahl. Die nicht limitierten Abgaskomponenten aus der FTIR Messung können, wegen der teilweise sehr niederen Emissionsniveaus, nur unsicher zeitaufgelöst gemessen und simuliert werden, so dass hier die Verwendung von Zyklusmittelwerten in [g/km] oder von mittleren Prozentwerten an den HC und NOx Emissionen empfohlen wird. Mit der entwickelten Methode und der Software PHEM bestehen nunmehr die Grundlagen, Emissionsfaktoren für Zweiräder in gleicher Qualität wie sie bei PKW und Nutzfahrzeugen bereits Standard ist, zu gerieren. Die Methoden und mögliche gemeinsame Messprogramme werden in der ERMES Gruppe bereits diskutiert und werden hoffentlich schon 2018 zu einer deutlichen Verbreiterung der Datengrundlage zum Emissionsverhalten von Zweirädern führen.
Die Schwerpunkte dieses Projekts lagen in der Untersuchung der Fahrerverfügbarkeit und Müdigkeit sowie in der Herstellung natürlichen Verhaltens bei längeren hochautomatisierten Fahrten. Es konnte im Rahmen von zwei Fahrsimulationsversuchen mit 15 und 42 Probanden gezeigt werden, dass bei hochautomatisierten Fahrten von 60 Minuten Müdigkeit auftreten kann, bei Ausprägung und Zeitpunkt des Auftretens jedoch große individuelle Unterschiede bestehen. Da eine zu kleine Stichprobe sich zum Zeitpunkt der Übernahme in einem entsprechend müden Zustand befand, kann die Auswirkung von Müdigkeit auf das Übernahmeverhalten nicht abschließend beurteilt werden. Hierfür empfehlen sich für die Zukunft Studien mit einem zustandsabhängigen Versuchsdesign. Der Einsatz von natürlichen fahrfremden Tätigkeiten, mit denen die Probanden sich frei beschäftigen durften, zeigte sowohl in der Probandstudie im Fahrsimulator als auch bei einem Expertenworkshop im Realfahrzeug eine hohe Involviertheit der Probanden in die Tätigkeiten während der gesamten 60 Minuten hochautomatisierten Fahrens. Es wird vermutet, dass dies auf die hohe intrinsische Motivation und den hohen Unterhaltungswert der selbstgewählten Aktivitäten zurückzuführen ist. Es zeigte sich außerdem, dass die Wahl der Tätigkeit vom Alter der Probanden abhängig ist. Eine Fahrtdauer von 60 Minuten wurde aufgrund der Ergebnisse aus allen drei Versuchen als realistisches Zukunftsszenario eingestuft und besitzt daher eine hohe Relevanz. Sowohl für die Bewertung von Müdigkeit als auch von Ablenkung war das Blickverhalten am meisten aufschlussreich. Für die Bewertung von Müdigkeit während der Beschäftigung mit fahrfremden Tätigkeiten wird jedoch ein kopfbasiertes Blickerfassungssystem, welches in der Lage ist, den Augenöffnungsgrad zu erfassen, oder videobasierte Verhaltensbeobachtung empfohlen.
Das Fahrzeugsegment der leichten Nutzfahrzeuge (LNF) hat in den vergangenen Jahren in Deutschland stark an Bedeutung gewonnen. Der Bestand ist im Jahr 2014 auf rund 2,1 Mio. Fahrzeuge angewachsen " das entspricht einem Wachstum von +133 % gegenüber 1990. Die Fahrleistungen der LNF haben nach den Annahmen für TREMOD im gleichen Zeitraum sogar um +170 % zugenommen. Die zunehmende Bedeutung der LNF sowie die heutige Vielfalt der Einsatzzwecke spiegeln sich in der Modellierung der Emissionen von LNF in Deutschland zum Teil nicht wieder. Die Datengrundlagen für das Verkehrsemissionsmodell TREMOD (Transport Emission Model) sowie für das Handbuch für Emissionsfaktoren des Straßenverkehrs (HBEFA) sind teilweise mehr als 20 Jahre alt. Die Aufteilung der Fahrleistung nach Verkehrssituationen und Längsneigungsklassen geht beispielsweise auf eine Analyse von HEUSCH/BOESEFELDT aus dem Jahr 1996 zurück. Die Fahrzyklen, die den Verkehrssituationen und damit auch den Emissionsfaktoren zugrunde liegen, basieren gerade für leichte Nutzfahrzeuge auf wenigen Daten oder sind von Pkw abgeleitet. Zudem stehen nur eine beschränkte Anzahl von Emissionsmessungen für LNF zur Verfügung, auf deren Basis die Emissionsfaktoren für HBEFA abgeleitet werden. Die Gesamtfahrleistung (Inlandsfahrleistung) der LNF in TREMOD basiert im Wesentlichen noch auf der Fahrleistungserhebung (FLE) 2002. Die Inlandsfahrleistung der LNF war hierbei etwa gleich hoch wie die Inländerfahrleistung. Jedoch wurde nur ca. die Hälfte der Fahrleistungen auf den freien Strecken gemäß Straßenverkehrszählung der BASt erfasst und die Differenz den Innerorts- und Gemeindestraßen in TREMOD zugeordnet. Die Fortschreibung der Fahrleistungen von 2002 bis 2014 erfolgte u.a. über die Straßenverkehrszählungen und die Bestandsentwicklung. Auswertungen der (bei Berichtslegung noch nicht definitiv vorliegenden) Fahrleistungserhebung 2014 müssen zeigen, ob die angenommenen Entwicklungen der Gesamtfahrleistung der LNF sowie pro Straßenkategorie plausibel sind. Vorläufige Ergebnisse der FLE 2014 zeigen deutlich höhere LNF-Inlandsfahrleistungen als aktuell in TREMOD hinterlegt. Eine Detailanalyse und Interpretation der Ergebnisse konnte aber im Rahmen dieses Projektes noch nicht erfolgen. Neben den bisher in TREMOD verwendeten Quellen wurden weitere Fahrleistungsdaten untersucht. Für das Jahr 2013 veröffentlichte das Kraftfahrtbundesamt (KBA) erstmals Inländerfahrleistungen je Fahrzeugkategorie und Fahrzeugalter, basierend auf Tachostandinformationen von 26,5 Mio. deutschen Kraftfahrzeugen. Es wird empfohlen die Fahrleistungsstatistik vom KBA in zukünftige TREMOD-Aktualisierungen einzubeziehen. Für die Herleitung der in HBEFA den LNF zugrunde gelegten Fahrmustern wurde bislang nicht nach Pkw und LNF unterschieden. Vergleiche der verfügbaren LNF- und Pkw-Fahrmuster bezüglich der Geschwindigkeit und der Wegedauer zeigen leichte Abweichungen in der Form, dass LNF tendenziell öfter mit geringeren Geschwindigkeiten und kürzerer Wegedauer unterwegs sind als Pkw. Die Unterschiede sind jedoch durchwegs gering. Es können auf der Basis der verfügbaren Datengrundlagen keine eigenständigen LNF-Fahrzyklen abgeleitet werden. Die Emissionsfaktoren in HBEFA werden über das Simulationsmodell PHEM der FVT-TU Graz generiert. Aufgrund der unzureichenden Datenlage konnten bisher für PHEM keine LNF-spezifischen Emissionskennfelder verwendet werden, d.h. es wurden modifizierte Pkw-Kennfelder für die Modellierung der Emissionsfaktoren verwendet. Mittlerweile stehen weitere LNF-Messungen für die Herleitung von Emissionskennfeldern zur Verfügung. Für die hinsichtlich der heutigen Fahrleistungen relevanten LNF-Fahrzeugschicht (N1-III-Diesel-Euro-5) liegen beispielsweise aktuell 10 zeitlich hochaufgelöste Emissionsmessungen vor, welche bei der nächsten Aktualisierung von HBEFA genutzt werden können.
The goal of the project FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) was to define an integrated set of test procedures and associated metrics to assess a vehicle's frontal impact protection, which includes self- and partner-protection. For the development of the set, two different full-width tests (full-width deformable barrier [FWDB] test, full-width rigid barrier test) and three different offset tests (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test, progressive deformable barrier [PDB] test, moveable deformable barrier with the PDB barrier face [MPDB] test) have been investigated. Different compatibility assessment procedures were analysed and metrics for assessing structural interaction (structural alignment, vertical and horizontal load spreading) as well as several promising metrics for the PDB/MPDB barrier were developed. The final assessment approach consists of a combination of the most suitable full-width and offset tests. For the full-width test (FWDB), a metric was developed to address structural alignment based on load cell wall information in the first 40 ms of the test. For the offset test (ODB), the existing ECE R94 was chosen. Within the paper, an overview of the final assessment approach for the frontal impact test procedures and their development is given.
Bus or heavy vehicle passenger accidents are rare events, compared with car accidents, but sometimes leads to a large number of victims especially in rollover crash scenarios. Two accidents occurred in Portugal in 2007 and 2013 in which 28 people died and more than 50 are injured, shown the importance of the investigation of such accidents. For the investigation of these accidents multidisciplinary teams are constituted with engineers and police officers. All the factors involved are taken into consideration including road design, traffic signs, maintenance and hardware, human factors, and vehicle factors. In this work a methodology to an accurate collection of the data is proposed. From the information collected the accident is reconstructed using the PC-CrashTM software. From this all the contribution factors are determined and recommendations to mitigate these crashes are listed. These two accidents are rollover accidents and the analysis of the injuries and its correlation with the use of retention systems is very important. From the medical data and with the dynamics of the accident determined simulations of the occupants with biomechanical models are carried out in order to evaluate the effect of the retention systems in the injuries. This analysis is based on injury criteria (such as Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) or Injury Severity Scale (ISS)). With this it is possible to determine if the seat belt was worn or not.
Since its creation in 2011 the Pre-Crash-Matrix (PCM) offers the possibility to observe the pre-crash phase until five seconds before crash for a wide range of accidents. Currently the PCM contains more than 8.000 reconstructed accidents out of the GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study) database and is enlarged continuously by more than 1.000 cases per year. Hence, a detailed investigation of active safety systems in real accident situations has been made feasible. The PCM contains all relevant data in database format to simulate the pre-crash phase until the first collision of the accident for a maximum of two participants. This includes the definition of the participants and their characteristics, the dynamic behavior of the participants as time-dependent course for five seconds before crash as well as the geometry of the traffic infrastructure. The digital sketch of the accident and information from GIDAS as well as from supplementary databases represent the main input for the simulation of the pre-crash phase of an accident with the VUFO simulation model VAST (Vufo Accident Simulation Tool). This simulation in turn embodies the foundation of the PCM. The PCM underlies continual improvements and enhancements in consultation with its users. In addition to collisions of cars with other cars, pedestrians, bicycles and motorcycles the PCM now also covers car to object and car to truck collisions. The paper illustrates car to truck collisions as a showcase and explains perspectives for further developments. In 2016 a more detailed definition of the contour of the vehicle was added. Furthermore, the geometrical surroundings of the accident site will be provided in a new structure with a higher level of detail. Thus, a precise classification of road marks and objects is possible to further improve the support of developing and evaluating ADAS. This paper gives an overview about the latest developments of the PCM with its innovations and provides an outlook to upcoming enhancements. Besides potential areas of application for the development of ADAS are shown.
This work describes the results of the experimental activity, illustrating the driving behavior observed in different conditions, relating them to the different methods of ADAS intervention and comparing the driver behavior without ADAS. In the present study, driver behavior was studied in road accidents involving elderly pedestrians, with different ADAS HMIs, as a base to develop a driver model in near missing pedestrian accidents. A literature research was conducted with the aim of finding out the main influencing factors, including environment, boundary conditions, configuration of impact, pedestrian and driver information, when pedestrian fatalities occur and an analysis of frequent road accidents was conducted to get more detailed information about the driver- behavior. In order to obtain more detailed information about pedestrian accidents, real road accidents were reconstructed with multibody simulations on PC-Crash and, by the comparison between literature findings and reconstructions, a generic accident scenario was defined. The generic accident scenario was implemented on the full scale dynamic driving simulator in use at the Laboratory for Safety and Traffic Accident Analysis (LaSIS, University of Florence, Italy) in order to analyse the driving behaviors of volunteers, also considering the influence of ADAS devices. Forty-five young volunteers were enrolled for this study, resulting in forty valid tests on different testing scenarios. Two different scenarios consisted in driving with or without ADAS in the vehicle. Different kinds of ADAS, acoustic and optical, with different time of intervention were tested in order to study the different reactions of the driver. The tests showed some interesting differences between driver's behavior when approaching the critical situation. Drivers with ADAS reacted earlier, but more slowly, depending also on the type of alarm, and often with double reaction when braking. In fact, the results of the activity showed that with ADAS intervention the time to collision (TTC) increases, but the reaction time and braking modality change: a) there is a sort of "latency" time between the accelerator pedal release and the brake pressure; b) the brake pressure is initially less intense. So the driver only partially takes advance from the TTC increase. These differences were valued not only qualitatively, but quantitatively as well. This work revealed to be useful to improve the knowledge of drivers" behavior, in order to realize a driver model that can be implemented to help attaining and assessing higher levels of automation through new technology.
The advent of active safety systems calls for the development of appropriate testing methods. These methods aim to assess the effectivity of active safety systems based on criteria such as their capability to avoid accidents or lower impact speeds and thus mitigate the injury severity. For prospective effectivity studies, simulation becomes an important tool that needs valid models not only to simulate driving dynamics and safety systems, but also to resolve the collision mechanics. This paper presents an impact model which is based on solving momentum conservation equations and uses it in an effectivity study of a generic collision mitigation system in reconstructed real accidents at junctions. The model assumes an infinitely short crash duration and computes output parameters such as post-crash velocities, delta-v, force directions, etc. and is applicable for all impact collision configurations such as oblique, excentric collisions. Requiring only very little computational effort, the model is especially useful for effectivity studies where large numbers of simulations are necessary. Validation of the model is done by comparison with results from the widely used reconstruction software PC-Crash. Vehicles involved in the accidents are virtually equipped with a collision mitigation system for junctions using the software X-RATE, and the simulations (referred to as system simulations) are started sufficiently early before the collision occurred. In order to assess the effectivity, the real accident (referred to as baseline) is compared with the system simulations by computing the reduction of the impact speeds and delta-v.
For more than a decade, ADAC accident researchers have analysed road accidents with severe injuries, recording some 20,000 accidents. An important task in accident research is to determine the causative factors of road accidents. Apart from vehicle engineering and human factors, accident research also focuses on infrastructural and environmental aspects. To find out what accident scenarios are the most common in ADAC accident research and what driver assistance systems can prevent them, our first task was to conduct a detailed accident analysis. Using CarMaker, we performed a realistic simulation of accident scenarios, including crashes, with varying parameters. To begin with, we made an initial selection of driver assistance systems in order to determine those with the greatest accident prevention potential. One important finding of this study is that the safety potential of the individual driver assistance systems can actually be examined. It also turned out that active safety offers even much more potential for development and innovation than passive safety. At the same time, testing becomes more demanding, too, as new systems keep entering the market, many of them differing in functional details. ADAC will continue to test all driver assistance systems as realistically as possible so as to be able to provide advice to car buyers. Therefore, it will be essential to develop and improve test conditions and criteria.
Twenty-eight percent of traffic accidents in Japan are rear-end collisions, and of these, 13% are multiple collisions (three or more vehicles and/or roadside objects). A post-crash braking system enables the driver to stop the vehicle in a short distance after a rear-end collision to prevent secondary collisions. In this study, the effectiveness of a post-crash braking system was examined using a drive recorder database. In 64% of rear-end collisions, the driver's braking was interrupted after the collision. The stopping distance was estimated with time data from the drive recorder. We predict that the brake assist would be effective in preventing secondary collisions in 21% of cases.
Injury probability functions for pedestrians and bicyclists based on real-world accident data
(2017)
The paper is focusing on the modelling of injury severity probabilities, often called as Injury Risk Functions (IRF). These are mathematical functions describing the probability for a defined population and for possible explanatory factors (variables) to sustain a certain injury severity. Injury risk functions are becoming more and more important as basis for the assessment of automotive safety systems. They contribute to the understanding of injury mechanisms, (prospective) evaluation of safety systems and definition of protection criteria or are used within regulation and/or consumer ratings. In all cases, knowledge about the correlation between mechanical behavior and injury severity is needed. IRFs are often based on biomechanical data. This paper is focusing on the derivation of injury probability models from real world accident data of the GIDAS database (German In-depth Accident Study). In contrast to most academic terms there is no explicit term definition or definition of creation processes existing for injury probability models based on empirical data. Different approaches are existing for such kind of models in the field of accident research. There is a need for harmonization in terms of the used methods and data as well as the handling with the existing challenges. These are preparation of the dataset, model assumptions, censored/unknown data, evaluation of model accuracy, definition of dependent and independent variable, and others. In the presented study, several empirical, statistical and phenomenological approaches were analyzed regarding their advantages and disadvantages and also their applicability. Furthermore, the identification of appropriate prediction parameters for the injury severity of pedestrians has been considered. Due to its main effect on injuries of pedestrians and bicyclists, the importance of the secondary impact has also been analyzed. Finally, the model accuracy, evaluated by several criteria, is the rating factor that gives the quality and reliability for application of the resulting models. After the investigation and evaluation of statistical approaches one method was chosen and appropriate prediction variables were examined. Finally, all findings were summarized and injury risk functions for pedestrians in real world accidents were created. Additionally, the paper gives instructions for the interpretation and usage of such functions. The presented results include IRFs for several injury severity levels and age groups. The presented models are based on a high amount of real world accidents and describe very well the injury severity probability of pedestrians and bicyclists in frontal collisions with current vehicles. The functions can serve as basis for the evaluation of effectiveness of systems like Pedestrian-AEB or Bicycle-AEB.
In most of developed countries, the progress made in passive safety during the last three decades allowed to drastically reduce the number of killed and severely injured especially for occupants of passenger cars. This reduction is mainly observed for frontal impacts for which the AIS3+ injuries has been reduced about 52% for drivers and 38% for front passengers. The stiffening of the cars' structure coupled with the generalization of airbags and the improvement of the seatbelt restraint (load limiter, pretension, etc.) allowed to protect vital body regions such as head, neck and thorax. However, the abdomen did not take advantage with so much success of this progress. The objective of this study is to draw up an inventory on the abdominal injuries of the belted car occupants involved in frontal impact, to present adapted counter-measures and to assess their potential effectiveness. In the first part the stakes corresponding to the abdominal injuries will be defined according to types of impact, seat location, occupants' age and type of injured organs. Then, we shall focus on the abdominal injury risk curves for adults involved in frontal impact and on the comparisons of the average risks according to the seat location. In the second part we will list counter-measures and we shall calculate their effectiveness. The method of case control will be used in order to estimate odds ratio, comparing two samples, given by occupants having or not having the studied safety system. For this study, two type of data sources are used: national road injured accident census and retrospective in-depth accident data collection. Abdominal injuries are mainly observed in frontal impact (52%). Fatal or severe abdominal occupant- injuries are observed at least in 27% of cases, ranking this body region as the most injured just after the thorax (51%). In spite of a twice lower occupation rate in the back seats compared to the front seats, the number of persons sustaining abdominal injuries at the rear place is higher than in the front place. In recent cars, the risk of having a serious or fatal abdominal injury in a frontal impact is 1.6% for the driver, 3.6% for the front passenger and 6.3% for the rear occupants. The most frequently hurt organs are the small intestine (17%), the spleen (16%) and the liver (13%). The most common countermeasures have a good efficiency in the reduction of the abdominal injuries for the adults: the stiffness of the structure of the seats allows decreasing the abdominal injury risk from 54% (driver) to 60% (front occupant), the seatbelt pretensioners decrease also this risk from 90% (driver) to 83% (front passenger).
From an automotive safety occupant protection standpoint, effective occupant restraint requires a system capable of providing non-injurious occupant ride down of anticipated crash forces. This is not only the case for frontal collisions, where occupant restraint is provided primarily by seatbelts and airbags, but is also critical for other crash modes such as side impacts, rear impacts, rollovers, as well as multiple impact events. In the rear impact crash mode, occupant restraint is provided primarily by the seatbacks and to some extent the seatbelts. Foundationally, therefore, what becomes fundamental to the seatback's role in rear occupant protection is its ability to contain the occupant within the seat, preventing occupant ramping, as well as preventing the seat's, and/or its occupant's, dangerous intrusion into the rear occupant's survival space where contact with rear compartment components and/ or rear seated occupants can present a significant injury risk. An analysis is presented of a series of rear impact sled testing conducted by the authors that evaluates the timing, position and extent of the front seatback's reward displacement toward and into the rear occupant compartment as well as consideration of the front seat occupant' ramping potential and its injury potential relative to the rear compartment. Additionally, three other series of testing are presented which assess various seat designs occupant retention capabilities. Lastly, a matched-pair comparison test series is presented which evaluates occupant motion in rear impact with and without use of a typical vehicle body mounted 3-point seatbelt. Discussion of restraint system performance observed in all the testing is included along with ATD biofidelity and thigh-gap considerations. The data collected and presented includes accelerometer instrumentation and high speed video analysis.