91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (133) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Sicherheit (58)
- Safety (57)
- Bewertung (40)
- Evaluation (assessment) (40)
- Vehicle (39)
- Fahrzeug (38)
- Anfahrversuch (34)
- Impact test (veh) (31)
- Conference (28)
- Test method (28)
- Versuch (27)
- Konferenz (26)
- Prüfverfahren (26)
- Test (26)
- Accident (22)
- Unfall (22)
- Fußgänger (20)
- Pedestrian (20)
- Anthropometric dummy (19)
- Deutschland (19)
- Germany (19)
- Car (18)
- Dummy (17)
- Collision (16)
- Pkw (16)
- Compatibility (15)
- Kompatibilität (15)
- Simulation (15)
- Driver assistance system (14)
- Method (14)
- Passive safety system (14)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (14)
- Verfahren (14)
- Zusammenstoß (14)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (13)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (13)
- Head on collision (13)
- Gesetzgebung (12)
- Legislation (12)
- Research project (12)
- Unfallverhütung (12)
- Accident prevention (11)
- Child (11)
- Forschungsarbeit (11)
- Kind (11)
- Analyse (math) (10)
- Analysis (math) (10)
- EU (10)
- Europa (10)
- Europe (10)
- Injury (10)
- Schlag (10)
- Shock (10)
- Verletzung (10)
- Autonomes Fahren (9)
- Autonomous driving (9)
- Driver (9)
- Driver information (9)
- Fahrer (9)
- Fahrerinformation (9)
- Fahrstabilität (9)
- Insasse (9)
- Lkw (9)
- Lorry (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (9)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (9)
- Vehicle handling (9)
- Vehicle occupant (9)
- Vehicle regulations (9)
- Active safety system (8)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (8)
- Automatic (8)
- Automatisch (8)
- Biomechanics (8)
- Biomechanik (8)
- Electronic driving aid (8)
- Elektronische Fahrhilfe (8)
- Improvement (8)
- Measurement (8)
- Messung (8)
- Motorcycle (8)
- Motorrad (8)
- Severity (accid (8)
- Severity (accid, injury) (8)
- Technologie (8)
- Technology (8)
- Verbesserung (8)
- injury) (8)
- Cyclist (7)
- Fahrzeugführung (7)
- Head (7)
- Kopf (7)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (7)
- Side impact (7)
- Standardisierung (7)
- Belastung (6)
- Bemessung (6)
- Braking (6)
- Bremsung (6)
- Design (overall design) (6)
- Driving (veh) (6)
- Impact test (6)
- Load (6)
- Prevention (6)
- Risiko (6)
- Safety belt (6)
- Sicherheitsgurt (6)
- Verletzung) (6)
- Alte Leute (5)
- Anti locking device (5)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (5)
- Ausrüstung (5)
- Benutzung (5)
- Communication (5)
- Deformation (5)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (5)
- Development (5)
- Entwicklung (5)
- Equipment (5)
- Ergonomics (5)
- Geschwindigkeit (5)
- Headlamp (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Kommunikation (5)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (5)
- Official approval (5)
- Reifen (5)
- Richtlinien (5)
- Risk (5)
- Scheinwerfer (5)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (5)
- Specifications (5)
- Speed (5)
- Standardization (5)
- Steering (process) (5)
- Tyre (5)
- Use (5)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (5)
- Accident rate (4)
- Aufprallschlitten (4)
- Bein (menschl) (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Collision avoidance system (4)
- Cost benefit analysis (4)
- Datenbank (4)
- Decrease (4)
- Driver training (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Ergonomie (4)
- Fahrausbildung (4)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (4)
- Fahrzeugsitz (4)
- Impact sled (4)
- Interior (veh) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Nacht (4)
- Night (4)
- Norm (tech) (4)
- Old people (4)
- Perception (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Road user (4)
- Seat (veh) (4)
- Sichtbarkeit (4)
- Specification (standard) (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (4)
- Verformung (4)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (4)
- Verminderung (4)
- Sichtbarkeit (4)
- Wahrnehmung (4)
- Airbag (3)
- Antikollisionssystem (3)
- Auffahrunfall (3)
- Bend (road) (3)
- Bicycle (3)
- Brake (3)
- Bremse (3)
- Bus (3)
- Database (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Error (3)
- Fahrleistung (3)
- Fahrrad (3)
- Fehler (3)
- Gewicht (3)
- Human body (3)
- Knie (menschl) (3)
- Kraftfahrzeug (3)
- Leuchtdichte (3)
- Luminance (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Messgerät (3)
- Modification (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Policy (3)
- Politik (3)
- Rear end collision (3)
- Reflectivity (3)
- Reflexionsgrad (3)
- Spikesreifen (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Statistik (3)
- Straßenkurve (3)
- Straßenverkehr (3)
- Studded tyre (3)
- Unterfahrschutz (3)
- Vehicle mile (3)
- Verhütung (3)
- Warning (3)
- Weight (3)
- Windschutzscheibe (3)
- Windscreen (veh) (3)
- Active safety (2)
- Adolescent (2)
- Age (2)
- Air bag (restraint system) (2)
- Aktive Sicherheit (2)
- Alter (2)
- Ankündigung (2)
- Apparatus (measuring) (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Baumusterzulassung (2)
- Bicyclist (2)
- Blendung (2)
- Body (car) (2)
- Braking distance (2)
- Bremsweg (2)
- Cause (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Data acquisition (2)
- Datenerfassung (2)
- Delivery vehicle (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Electric vehicle (2)
- Elektrofahrzeug (2)
- Empfindlichkeit (2)
- Fahranfänger (2)
- Fatality (2)
- Federung (2)
- Forschungsbericht (2)
- France (2)
- Frankreich (2)
- Glare (2)
- Griffigkeit (2)
- Highway traffic (2)
- Impact study (2)
- Individueller Verkehr (2)
- Industrie (2)
- Industry (2)
- International (2)
- Jugendlicher (2)
- Karosserie (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Kunststoff (2)
- Landstraße (2)
- Mathematical model (2)
- Nummer (2)
- Plastic material (2)
- Private transport (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Prüfstand (2)
- Rear view mirror (2)
- Recently qualified driver (2)
- Rechenmodell (2)
- Reconstruction (accid) (2)
- Reflectorized material (2)
- Reflexstoffe (2)
- Road network (2)
- Rural road (2)
- Rückspiegel (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Sensitivity (2)
- Sensor (2)
- Skidding resistance (2)
- Straßennetz (2)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (2)
- Suspension (veh) (2)
- Test rig (2)
- Traffic count (2)
- Transport (2)
- Tödlicher Unfall (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vehicle inspection (2)
- Verkehrserhebung (2)
- Versuchspuppe (2)
- Veränderung (2)
- Visual display (2)
- Zahl (2)
- Zulassung (tech) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- Abdomen (1)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (1)
- Acceleration (1)
- Accident data (1)
- Accident proneness (1)
- Accompanied driving (1)
- Adaptive cruise control (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anhänger (1)
- Anti blocking device (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Attention (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Axle (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Baustoff (1)
- Begleitetes Fahren (1)
- Begrenzungsleuchten (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Benefit cost analysis (1)
- Berechnung (1)
- Beschleunigung (1)
- Betriebsverhalten (1)
- Bibliographie (1)
- Bibliography (1)
- Bildschirm (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Bonnet (car) (1)
- Brake light (1)
- Bremslicht (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Bumper (1)
- Calculation (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Carriageway (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Coefficient of friction (1)
- Colour (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Components of the car (1)
- Compression (1)
- Construction (1)
- Contact (tyre road) (1)
- Control (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crash helmet (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Cycle car (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Data security (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Daytime running light (1)
- Deceleration (1)
- Decke (Straße) (1)
- Deckschicht (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Demand (econ) (1)
- Demographie (1)
- Deutschland ; Konferenz (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Dimension (1)
- Disabled person (1)
- Distribution (gen) (1)
- Driver experience (1)
- Driving aptitude (1)
- Durability (1)
- Durchsichtigkeit (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emission (1)
- Emission control (1)
- Emissionskontrolle (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Environment (1)
- Environment protection (1)
- Erfahrung (menschl) (1)
- Erste Hilfe (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Experience (human) (1)
- Experimental road (1)
- Expert system (1)
- Expertensystem (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahn (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrbare Barriere (1)
- Fahrstreifen (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrtauglichkeit (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugabstand (1)
- Fahrzeugachse (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Fahrzeugteile (1)
- Failure (1)
- Farbe (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- First aid (1)
- Force (1)
- Form (1)
- Four wheel drive (1)
- Fracht (1)
- Frau (1)
- Freight (1)
- Front (1)
- Fuel consumption (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Gebiet (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Gestaltung (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Gussasphalt (1)
- Haftung (jur) (1)
- Halogen (1)
- Halogene (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Hazard (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Hell (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- In service behaviour (1)
- In situ (1)
- Intelligent transport system (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Interview (1)
- Italien (1)
- Italy (1)
- Itinerary (1)
- Japan (1)
- Kamera (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Kleinwagen (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kraft (1)
- Kraftstoffverbrauch (1)
- Körperstellung (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Layout (1)
- Liability (1)
- Lichtstärke (1)
- Lieferfahrzeug (1)
- Light (colour) (1)
- Light intensity (1)
- Limit (1)
- Location (1)
- Lochstreifen (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Material (constr) (1)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Mobile barrier (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Mobilität (1)
- Motorhaube (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nachfrage (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Naturalistic Driving (1)
- Naturalistic driving (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Oberfläche (1)
- On the spot accident investigation (1)
- Optimum (1)
- Optische Anzeige (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Overturning (veh) (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Population (1)
- Posture (1)
- Properties (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public relations (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Punched tape (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radial (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Rear (1)
- Region (1)
- Reibungsbeiwert (1)
- Reiseweg (1)
- Research report (1)
- Retread tyre (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road (1)
- Road traffic (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rolling resistance (1)
- Rollwiderstand (1)
- Runderneuerter Reifen (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Saftey (1)
- Sample (stat) (1)
- Schall (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schutzhelm (1)
- Schweregrad (unfall (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Schwingung (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Side (1)
- Side light (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Sound (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Stability (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- Standfestigkeit (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steuerung (1)
- Stichprobe (1)
- Stoßstange (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Surface (1)
- Surfacing (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Tagesfahrlicht (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (1)
- Technische Überwachung (1)
- Technische Überwachung (Fahrzeug) (1)
- Teenage driver (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Temperatur (1)
- Temperature (1)
- Tests (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic lanes (1)
- Traffic motivation (1)
- Traffic regulation (1)
- Traffic regulations (1)
- Traffic sign (1)
- Traffic survey (1)
- Trailer (1)
- Train (1)
- Transparent (1)
- Transport infrastructure (1)
- Trend (stat) (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- USA (1)
- Umwelt (1)
- Umweltschutz (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfalldaten (1)
- Unfallneigung (1)
- Unfallverhuetung (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Unterleib (1)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle Regulations (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle spacing (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (1)
- Verkehrsmotivation (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Verkehrsuntersuchung (1)
- Verkehrszeichen (1)
- Versuchsstrecke (1)
- Verteilung (allg) (1)
- Verzögerung (1)
- Vibration (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Vierradantrieb (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Warnung (1)
- Wearing course (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- verletzung) (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
- Überschlagen (1)
Recent accident statistics from the German national database state bicyclists being the second endangered group of vulnerable road users besides pedestrians. With 399 fatalities, more than 14.000 seriously injured and more than 61.000 slightly injured persons on german roads in the year 2011, the group of bicyclists is ranked second of all road user groups (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2012). While the overall bicycle helmet usage frequency in Germany is very low, evidence is given that its usage leads to a significant reduction of severe head injuries. After an estimation of the benefit of bicycle helmet usage as well as an appropriate test procedure for bicyclists, this paper describes two different approaches for the improvement of bicyclist safety. While the first one is focusing on the assessment of the vehicle based protection potential for bicyclists, the second one is concentrating on the safety assessment of bicycle helmets. Within the first part of the study the possible revision of the existing pedestrian testing protocols is being examined, using in depth accident data, full scale simulation and hardware testing. Within the second part of the study, the results of tests according to supplemental test procedures for the safety assessment of bicycle helmets developed by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) are presented. An additional full scale test performed at reduced impact speed proves that measures of active vehicle safety as e.g. braking before the collision event do not necessarily always lead to a reduction of injury severity.
A flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been evaluated by a Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG) of the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN-ECE). It will be implemented within phase 2 of the global technical regulation (GTR 9) as well as within a new ECE regulation on pedestrian safety as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents (UN-ECE 2010-1, 2010-2 and 2010-3). Due to its biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia section, the FlexPLI is found to having an improved knee and tibia injury assessment ability when being compared to the current legislative test tool, the lower legform impactor developed by the Pedestrian Safety Working Group of the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC WG 17). However, due to a lack of biofidelity in terms of kinematics and loadings in the femur part of the FlexPLI, an appropriate assessment of femur injuries is still outstanding. The study described in this paper is aimed to close this gap. Impactor tests with the FlexPLI at different impact heights on three vehicle frontends with Sedan, SUV and FFV shape are performed and compared to tests with a modified FlexPLI with upper body mass. Full scale validation tests using a modified crash test dummy with attached FlexPLI that are carried out for the first time prove the more humanlike responses of the femur section with applied upper body mass. Apart from that they also show that the impact conditions described in the current technical provisions for tests with the FlexPLI don"t necessarily compensate the missing torso mass in terms of knee and tibia loadings either. Therefore it can be concluded that an applied upper body mass will contribute to a more biofidelic overall behavior of the legform and subsequently an improved injury assessment ability of all lower extremity injuries addressed by the FlexPLI. Nevertheless, the validity of the original as well as the modified legform for tests against vehicles with extraordinary high bumpers as well as flat front vehicles still needs to be evaluated in detail. A first clue is given by the application of an additional accelerometer to the legform.
The market introduction and penetration of electric vehicles can be seen as a milestone in order to reduce the environmental burden imposed by the transport sector. The wide-spread use of electric vehicles powered by electricity from renewable sources promises a substantial reduction of local emissions in urban areas as well as greenhouse gas emissions. To be a successful mobility alternative several obstacles and challenges have to be overcome first. Especially the customers' purchase decision determines finally whether an innovation like electromobility will be successful. Therefore, this paper concentrates on demand-related obstacles and barriers for a broad market deployment of electric cars. Within the Electromobility+ project eMAP these issues are investigated via a consumer survey. It was designed to identify the awareness of potential consumers of electric cars as well as give an estimate of the attitude towards this new technology. In addition to the picture of potential demand-related obstacles the consumers were asked to evaluate the suitability of various promotion measures.
The "Autonomous driving on the roads of the future: Villa Ladenburg Project" by the Daimler und Benz-Stiftung looks at degrees of automation that will only become technically feasible in the distant future. The treatment of the legal questions in the present chapter therefore draws heavily on the description of the use cases, which begin to provide a concrete basis for evaluating individual issues. Uncertainties in predicting future technical developments can be expected and will have a commensurate impact on the assumptions and conclusions of this chapter. The resulting uncertainty is nevertheless unavoidable if one wants to press ahead with important interrelated issues. This chapter is therefore intended as a contribution to the debate on societal aspects of automated driving from a legal perspective and not as a legalistic evaluation of the subject. The consideration will largely focus on the situation within the context of current German law. The legal views expressed are those of the author and are based on nine years of experience in the field of driver assistance system research. In terms of the underlying conception presented here, the societal dimension of autonomous vehicles addressed in the present project goes well beyond the adjustments to the legal framework currently being called for in Germany. The following will examine the question of "societal acceptance" in the context of the legal questions raised by autonomous vehicles. This line of investigation is not immediately obvious and covers only a segment of the more thoroughgoing focus of the project.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and the final report to the steering committee on frontal impact [Faerber 2007] and the FP5 VC-COMPAT[Edwards 2007] project activities, two test approaches were identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis will be performed. In the FIMCAR Deliverable D 3.1 [Adolph 2013] the development and assessment of criteria and associated performance limits for the full width test procedure were reported. In this Deliverable D3.2 analyses of the test data (full width tests, car-to-car tests and component tests), further development and validation of the full width assessment protocol and development of the load cell and load cell wall specification are reported. The FIMCAR full-width assessment procedure consists of a 50 km/h test against the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB). The Load Cell Wall behind the deformable element assesses whether or not important Energy Absorbing Structures are within the Common Interaction Zone as defined based on the US part 581 zone. The metric evaluates the row forces and requires that the forces directly above and below the centre line of the Common Interaction Zone exceed a minimum threshold. Analysis of the load spreading showed that metrics that rely on sum forces of rows and columns are within acceptable tolerances. Furthermore it was concluded that the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the FWDB test is acceptable. The FWDB test was shown to be capable to detect lower load paths that are beneficial in car-to-car impacts.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were to review existing full-width test procedures and their discussed compatibility metrics, to report recent activities and findings with respect to full-width assessment procedures and to assess test procedures and metrics. Starting with a review of previous work, candidate metrics and associated performance limits to assess a vehicle- structural interaction potential, in particular its structural alignment, have been developed for both the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB) and Full Width Rigid Barrier (FWRB) tests. Initial work was performed to develop a concept to assess a vehicle- frontal force matching. However, based on the accident analyses performed within FIMCAR frontal force matching was not evaluated as a first priority and thus in line with FIMCAR strategy the focus was put on the development of metrics for the assessment of structural interaction which was evaluated as a first priority.
The term driver assistance systems in the chapter title shall be understood to include vehicle automation. This chapter starts with a homogeneous and consistent classification and nomenclature of all kinds of driver assistance systems known and under discussion today (including vehicle automation). It thereby builds upon familiar classification schemes by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and the standardization body SAE international. Detailed evaluation of the German legal situation for driver assistance systems and vehicle automation is provided in the following Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, an overview is given on the legal system in the US to reveal aspects relevant for vehicle automation. This is intended as initial information for those not acquainted to the US legal system which has been the first to regulate automation in several federal states. Finally, in Sect. 4, the current rating scheme of the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) is presented in comparison to legal instruments. The model of a consumer protection based approach proves to be a flexible instrument with great advantages in promoting new technologies. Technical vehicle regulations on the other hand rule minimum requirements. Both approaches are needed to achieve maximum vehicle safety.
Für eine quantitativ exakte Beschreibung der mit der Gefahrgutbeförderung verbundenen Risiken fehlen sowohl statistische Voraussetzungen als auch eine wissenschaftlich begründete Risikoanalyse. Eine Risikoanalyse der Gefahrgutbeförderung soll zweckmäßigerweise auf Transportketten und nicht auf den direkten Vergleich von Verkehrsträgern abstellen. Zentrale Kategorie zur Definition des Risikos sollte dabei der Unfall sein. Zusammen mit der Transportleistung sollte er das Risiko als Wahrscheinlichkeitsaussage beschreiben. Mit in die Risikobestimmung einzubeziehen ist die Unfallschwere. Im Rahmen des Beitrages schlägt eine Projektgruppe eine dreistufig angelegte Risikoanalyse vor. Die Bausteine dieser Risikoanalyse bestehen aus 1. einer mathematisch-statistischen Risikoanalyse, 2. einer Schwachstellenanalyse und 3. einem Systemmodell zur ständigen Analyse des Gefahrgutbeförderungsrisikos. Dazu werden in dem Forschungsbericht grundsätzliche Überlegungen zur Risikobewertung angestellt, auf das Regelwerk des Gefahrguttransportes eingegangen, Ausbildung, Training und Überprüfung der Fahrzeugführer behandelt sowie auf das Gefahrgut und die Gefahrgutumschließung eingegangen. Ferner befasst sich der Bericht mit der Fahrzeugtechnik, der Verkehrsinfrastruktur, Informationssystemen und der Sicherheit im Gefahrguttransport in den neuen Bundesländern. Zum Schluss werden Forschungsempfehlungen bezüglich der Sicherheit in der Gefahrgutbeförderung formuliert.
Although the bus belongs to the safest traffic means, single accidents can be particularly severe and concern many passengers. Especially in case of fires a high number of injured and killed persons can be the outcome. Fire safety of buses therefore is of high importance. With the increase of synthetic and plastic materials as a material for the interior equipment of buses and coaches because of their ood mechanical properties combined with low weight, the question arises whether the safety level has decreased in case of a fire during the last years - also compared to other means of transport. Because of the combustible plastics and their ability to release a high amount of heat the main fire load in buses is no longer the fuel but the plastic materials which are also often easy to ignite. Besides the flammability of the equipments, the production of smoke, the smoke development and propagation and its toxicity for the people as well as the testing methods and limit values are of interest. For those reasons research projects were initiated on behalf of the German Federal Highway Research Institute. At the one hand the fire behavior of coach interiors was examined in general focusing on fire propagation as well as fire detection and signalling. As result, recommendations with regard to early fire detection systems for the engine compartments and on-board extinguishing equipment were elaborated. At the other hand research is carried out to examine heat release, smoke, smoke propagation and its toxicity due to burning bus interior materials. The paper describes which effective and economically reasonable fire safety requirements for interiors of buses would improve the current situation. Proposals for amendments of current requirements are recommended including the specification of appropriate limit values. In particular, it is taken into consideration which reasonable fire safety standards from other transport sectors, especially the rail sector, should be transferred to buses.
The objectives of the FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) project are to answer the remaining open questions identified in earlier projects (such as understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of force based metrics and barrier deformation based metrics, confirmation of specific compatibility issues such as structural interaction, investigation of force matching) and to finalise the frontal impact test procedures required to assess compatibility. Research strategies and priorities were based on earlier research programs and the FIMCAR accident data analysis. The identified real world safety issues were used to develop a list of compatibility characteristics which were then prioritised within the consortium. This list was the basis for evaluating the different test candidates. This analysis resulted in the combination of the Full Width Deformable Barrier test (FWDB) with compatibility metrics and the existing Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) as described in UN-ECE Regulation 94 with additional cabin integrity requirement as being proposed as the FIMCAR assessment approach. The proposed frontal impact assessment approach addresses many of the issues identified by the FIMCAR consortium but not all frontal impact and compatibility issues could be addressed.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions, the crash compatibility between the colliding vehicles is crucial. Compatibility compromises both the self protection and the partner protection properties of vehicles. For the accident data analysis, the CCIS (GB) and GIDAS (DE) in-depth data bases were used. Selection criteria were frontal car accidents with car in compliance with ECE R94. For this study belted adult occupants in the front seats sustaining MAIS 2+ injuries were studied. Following this analysis FIMCAR concluded that the following compatibility issues are relevant: - Poor structural interaction (especially low overlap and over/underriding) - Compartment strength - Frontal force mismatch with lower priority than poor structural interaction In addition injuries arising from the acceleration loading of the occupant are present in a significant portion of frontal crashes. Based on the findings of the accident analysis the aims that shall be addressed by the proposed assessment approach were defined and priorities were allocated to them. The aims and priorities shall help to decide on suitable test procedures and appropriate metrics. In general it is anticipated that a full overlap and off-set test procedure is the most appropriate set of tests to assess a vehicle- frontal impact self and partner protection.
New vehicle types are extensively tested to check almost all factors that influence ride and handling. With reference to the Association of German Car Tuners" (VDAT e.V.) valuations, approximately 10% of all cars in Germany are being modified by their owners. 28 % of those modifications" sales are divergent wheel-tire combinations, 13 % are tuning measures on the chassis suspension or wheel spacers. In almost all cases the singular modifications present a general permission for specific vehicles they have been tested in. Combined tuning measures, however, are often checked by just one inspector, following a procedure of mostly subjective assessment criteria. Today, critical attributes are only being observed, in case a vehicle is involved in an accident and the modifications are identified as crash causal factors or as a cofactor on the development of a crash. For the first time, a field study allows a survey of safety affecting chassis modifications. The test layout has to comply with some basic conditions. Different vehicle concepts with a wide margin of modifications are required to get a high transferability of the results. A total amount of more than 150 tested vehicles serves the same purpose. The tests are limited concerning the installation time of measurement techniques and the requirement that no damage, defilement or immoderate wear of the vehicles are accepted by their owners. Due to such factors as well as the driver Ìs acceptance, the vehicles are controlled by its owners instead of robots or test drivers. For keeping down the driver- influence, the lane has narrow boundaries and the driver has to drive in strictly adherence to the given instructions. After gathering all modifications, as well as static and kinematic parameters like the toe and camber angle, dynamic testing of predominantly lateral dynamics is conducted. Besides standardized tests like the ISO 3888-2 (Obstacle Avoidance) or the ISO 14512 (Braking on Surfaces with Split Coefficient of Friction), to test the influence of modified kingpin offsets caused by wheel spacers, some deviant tests are conducted. Those are required due to the demand of objective test results for road tests with vertical induced stimulation of the chassis suspension. Hence, new tests on corner braking with and without vertical stimulation have been developed. The interpretation of data includes thresholds, e.g. the maximum entrance velocity without hitting cones, on the one hand, and the analysis of characteristics of data concerning time and frequency range, "1-second values" and peak response times on the other hand. Besides the thresholds as indicators for the achievable velocities, which are mainly affected by friction coefficients, the vehicle reaction in the course of time characterizes the vehicle reaction in the threshold range and consequently the operational demands on the driver. The field study has started and promises the first long-range analysis of chassis modifications. The results offer a basis for hypothesis and resultant further test layouts for oncoming studies of the identified critical tuning measures.
Vor dem Hintergrund der derzeitigen Verkehrs- und Unfallsituation sowie verkehrsrechtlicher Vorschriften wurde durch Auswertung humanwissenschaftlicher und technischer Literatur eine Sachstandsbeschreibung erstellt, die die in Zusammenhang mit Auffahrunfällen und ihrer Verhinderung stehenden Aspekte aufzeigt. Als fahrzeugtechnische Hilfen zur Einhaltung eines ausreichenden Abstandes zwischen hintereinander fahrenden Fahrzeugen werden dabei vorrangig autarke Systeme - das sind solche, bei denen sich alle notwendigen Vorrichtungen im Fahrzeug befinden - betrachtet. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der bekannten technischen Hilfsmittel, insbesondere der Abstandswarn- und Abstandsregelungseinrichtungen werden aufgezeigt. Es stellte sich heraus, dass den Warnstrategien sowie ihren Auswirkungen auf den Verkehrsablauf und die Verkehrssicherheit besondere Bedeutung zukommt. In diesem Zusammenhang werden auch Zielkonflikte, insbesondere zwischen Sicherheitsforderungen und Fahrerakzeptanz, deutlich. Im Teil I des Berichts erfolgt die zusammenfassende Beschreibung und kritische Wertung des Sachstandes. Im Teil II werden die Auswerteergebnisse zu den angesprochenen Fragenkomplexen im einzelnen dargestellt. Teil III enthält eine Kurzdokumentation der für die Erstellung des Berichts wesentlichsten Literaturstellen.
Die zukünftige Entwicklung der Straßenverkehrssicherheit und damit auch der Fahrzeugsicherheit wird durch gesellschaftliche, wirtschaftliche, klimapolitische und verkehrspolitische Rand- und Rahmenbedingungen und die voranschreitende technische Entwicklung geprägt sein, die auch für den Gesetzgeber eine Herausforderung darstellen. So wird sich auch das Folgeprogramm des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS) für das derzeitige aus dem Jahr 2001 stammende "Programm für mehr Sicherheit im Straßenverkehr" an den Schwerpunkten des "4th Road Safety Action Programme" ausrichten, das im Frühjahr 2010 durch die EU-Kommission veröffentlicht werden soll. Im Prozess zu einer weiteren Verbesserung der Straßenverkehrssicherheit werden unter anderem der demografische Wandel in unserer Gesellschaft, die durch eine erforderliche CO2-Reduktion bedingte Einführung alternativer Antriebe (Elektromobilität) verbunden mit Leichtbau sowie die gesetzlichen Rahmenbedingung (Wiener Abkommen) eine bedeutende Rolle spielen. Die Klärung der gesetzlichen Rahmenbedingungen ist unerlässlich, um die Vision vom unfallfreien Fahren Realität werden lassen zu können.
Ziel des Forschungsvorhabens war es, durch gezielte Auswertung des Unfallgeschehens den Einfluss von Fahrerverhaltensweisen beziehungsweise -merkmalen und technischen Fahrzeugparametern auf die Unfallhäufigkeit und die Unfallart zu ermitteln. Zunächst wurde eine Auswertung der Literatur und die Beschaffung und Aufbereitung des Datenmaterials vorgenommen. Die Grundlage der Auswertungen bildeten die Unfälle mit Pkw-Beteiligung im Bundesland Nordrhein-Westfalen aus dem Jahre 1980. Die Datensätze waren vom Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt in Flensburg um fahrzeugtechnische Angaben erweitert worden. Zur Relativierung der Unfallzahlen wurden fahrzeugtypenspezifische jährliche Fahrleistungen und Bestände berechnet. Weiterhin wurde das Geschwindigkeitsverhalten im freien Verkehr in Abhängigkeit vom Fahreralter sowie vom Fahrzeugtyp ermittelt. Um die Wechselwirkungen von Fahrer- und Fahrzeugeigenschaften im Unfallgeschehen unabhängig voneinander betrachten zu können, war es notwendig, einen "Normalfahrer" zu definieren. Der "Normalfahrer" wurde anhand von Analysen ausgewählter Unfallsituationen mit dem Ziel beschrieben, mit diesen Fahrern Fahrversuche mit Pkw durchführen zu können, deren Ergebnisse weder durch besonders gute noch durch besonders schlechte, sondern vielmehr durch eine durchschnittliche Eignung des Fahrers zum Führen eines Kraftfahrzeuges geprägt sein sollen. Anhand dieser Fahrversuche sollen Grenzen von Kennwerten, die Fahrzeugeigenschaften und das Fahrverhalten beschreiben, abgeleitet werden, die sich als dem "Normalfahrer" angepasst erweisen. Aufgrund der aufgezeigten Zusammenhänge zwischen dem Fahreralter und der ursächlichen Beteiligung an bestimmten Unfalltypen ist es nunmehr möglich, durchschnittlich gute Fahrer als Probanden auszuwählen, die je nach Art des Versuches entweder zur Gruppe der jüngeren und älteren Fahrer gehören. Nach vorheriger Festlegung eines Anteilswertes von Fahrern, die als "normal" anzusehen sind, können bei gleichzeitiger Berücksichtigung der für jüngere und ältere Fahrer typischen Versagensarten die Altersintervalle bestimmt werden, aus denen die "Normalfahrer" für die Fahrversuche auszuwählen sind.
Beschrieben wird die Evaluierung eines Testverfahrens der Arbeitsgruppe 10 des European Experimental Vehicle Committee, mit dem die "Fußgängerverträglichkeit" von Frontflächen von Personenkraftwagen bestimmt werden kann. Dabei werden verschiedene Anprallarten von Fußgängern an Fahrzeugen simuliert: der Anprall eines Beines an den Stoßfänger, der Anprall des Oberschenkels an die Vorderkante der Fronthaube und der Anprall des Kopfes auf die Fronthaube. Im Beitrag wird auf die Durchführung von Tests zum Oberschenkelanprall und zum Beinanprall an drei verschiedenen Fahrzeugtypen eingegangen. Beschrieben werden Testverfahren, Versuchsaufbau und Versuchsdurchführung. Die Versuchsreihe zeigte, dass das entwickelte Testverfahren praktikabel ist.
Thoracic injury is one of the predominant types of severe injuries in frontal accidents. The assessment of the injury risk to the thorax in the current frontal impact test procedures is based on the uni-axial chest deflection measured in the dummy Hybrid III. Several studies have shown that criteria based on the linear chest potentiometer are not sensitive enough to distinguish between different restraint systems, and cannot indicate asymmetric chest loading, which has been shown to correlate to increased injury risk. Furthermore, the measurement is sensitive to belt position on the dummy chest. The objective of this study was to evaluate the optical multipoint chest deflection measurement system "RibEye" in frontal impact sled tests. Therefore the sensitivity of the RibEyesystem to different restraint system parameters was investigated. Furthermore, the issue of signal drop out at the 6 th rib was investigated in this study.A series of sled tests were conducted with the RibEye system in the Hybrid III 50%. The sled environment consisted of a rigid seat and a standard production three-point seat belt system. Rib deflections were recorded with the RibEye system and additionally with the standard chest potentiometer. The tests were carried out at crash pulses of two different velocities (30 km/h and 64 km/h). The tests were conducted with different belt routing to investigate the sensitivity of chest deflection measurements to belt position on the dummy chest. Furthermore, different restraint system parameters were investigated (force limiter level, with or without pretensioning) to evaluate if the RibEye measurements provide additional information to distinguish between restraint system configurations . The results showed that with the RibEye system it was possible to identify the effect of belt routing in more detail. The chest deflections measured with the standard chest potentiometer as well as the maximum deflection measured by RibEye allowed the distinction to be made between different force limiter levels. The RibEye system was also able to clearly show the asymmetric deflection of the rib cage due to belt loading. In some configurations, differences of more than 15 mm were observed between the left and side areas of the chest. Furthermore, the abdomen insert was identified as source of the problem of signal drop out at the 6th rib. Possible solutions are discussed. In conclusion, the RibEye system provided valuable additional information regarding the assessment of restraint systems. It has the potential to enable the evaluation of thoracic injury risk due to asymmetric loading. Further investigations with the RibEye should be extended to tests in a vehicle environment, which include a vehicle seat and other restraint system components such as an airbag.
Evaluation of the performance of competitive headforms as test tools for interior headform testing
(2009)
The European Research Project APROSYS has evaluated the interior headform test procedure developed by EEVC WG 13, representing the head contact in the car during a lateral impact. One important aspect within this test procedure was the selection of an appropriate impactor. The WG13 procedure currently uses the Free Motion Headform as used within the FMVSS 201. The ACEA 3.5 kg headform used in Phase 1 of the European Directive and the future European Regulation on Pedestrian Protection is still discussed as a possible alternative. This paper reports work performed by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) as a part of the APROSYS Task 1.1.3. The study compares the two headform impactors according to FMVSS and ACEA, in a series of basic tests in order to evaluate their sensitivity towards different impact angles, impact accuracy, the effect of differences to impactors of the same type and the effects of the repeatability and reproducibility of the test results. The test surface consisted of a steel tube covered with PU foam and PVC, representing the car interior to be tested. Despite of the higher mass of the FMH the HIC values of this impactor were generally lower than those of the ACEA headform. The FMH showed a higher repeatability of test results but a high sensitivity on the angle of roll, the spherical ACEA impactor performed better with regards to the reproducibility. In case of the ACEA impactor-, the angle of roll had no influence.
The PDB, BASt and Opel conducted two test series to evaluate possible effects on the results obtained using the EEVC WG17 Lower Legform Impactor as a test tool for the assessment of pedestrian safety. The reproducibility and repeatability of the test results were assessed using six legform impactors while keeping the test parameters constant. In the second series one impactor was used and the test parameters were varied to assess the effects on the readings of the legform. The test parameters were velocity, temperature, relative humidity, the point of first contact regarding the deviation in z-direction and the deviations of the pitch, roll and yaw angle. The tests were performed using an inverse setup, i.e. the legform was hit by a guided linear impactor equipped with a honeycomb deformation element. This setup was chosen to be able to vary each single parameter while avoiding variations of the other test parameters at the same time. The test parameters were varied stronger than allowed in regulatory use in order to determine possible dependencies between the parameters and the readings which were acceleration, bending angle and shear displacement.
It is well known that most accidents with pedestrians are caused by the driver not being alert or misinterpreting the situation. For that reason advanced forward looking safety systems have a high potential to improve safety for this group of vulnerable road users. Active pedestrian protection systems combine reduction of impact speed by driver warning and/or autonomous braking with deployment of protective devices shortly before the imminent impact. According to the Euro NCAP roadmap the Autonomous Emergency Braking system tests for Pedestrians Protection will be set in force from 2016 onwards. Various projects and organisations in Europe are developing performance tests and assessment procedures as accompanying measures to the Euro NCAP initiative. To provide synthesised input to Euro NCAP so-called Harmonisation Platforms (HP-) have been established. Their main goal is to foster exchange of information on key subjects, thereby generating a clear overview of similarities and differences on the approaches chosen and, on that basis, recommend on future test procedures. In this paper activities of the Harmonisation Platform 2 on the development of Test Equipment are presented. For the testing targets that mimic humans different sensing technologies are required. A first set of specifications for pedestrian targets and the propulsion systems as collected by Harmonisation Platform 2 are presented together with a first evaluation for a number of available tools.