91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (37)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (17)
- Arbeitspapier (7)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (5)
- Bericht (2)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (1)
Schlagworte
- Versuch (69) (entfernen)
Die vorliegende Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit den Auswirkungen alternativer Antriebskonzepte auf die Fahrdynamik von Pkw. Es werden einleitend die konventionellen und alternativen Antriebskonzepte sowie Unterschiede in Hinblick auf die Fahrdynamik herausgearbeitet. Die Ergebnisse einer Recherche zur Fahrwerksentwicklung von Hybrid- und Elektrofahrzeugen zeigen keine klaren Trends zu neuartigen oder geänderten Fahrwerkskonzepten, sodass auf eine getrennte Betrachtung von Fahrwerken für Fahrzeuge mit konventionellen und alternativen Antrieben verzichtet werden kann. Die erarbeiteten Unterschiede zwischen konventionellen und alternativen Antrieben zeigen, dass die Möglichkeit der Rekuperation von Hybrid- und E-Fahrzeugen insbesondere bei kombinierten Längs- und Querkräften zu deutlichen Auswirkungen auf die Fahrdynamik führen kann. Im nächsten Schritt werden daher Fahrmanöver zusammengestellt und in Bezug auf die Relevanz für die Rekuperation analysiert. Dabei erweist sich das nach DIN ISO 7975 genormte Fahrmanöver "Bremsen im Kreis" als zielführend, die Auswirkungen der Rekuperation auf die Fahrdynamik zu analysieren. Außerdem wird das Fahrzeugverhalten bei einer Geradeausbremsung und folgender Lenkanregung sowie bei einer Bremsung auf μ-Split untersucht, da auch hier Wechselwirkungen von Antrieb und Fahrwerk auftreten. Zur Beurteilung der Ergebnisse wird neben der Fahrstabilität auch die Wahrnehmbarkeit eines geänderten Fahrverhaltens betrachtet. Anhand einer Literaturrecherche wurde für die Giergeschwindigkeit ein Schwellwert von 3-°/s für die Wahrnehmbarkeit gefunden. Die Ergebnisse einer Simulationsstudie mit zwei Fahrzeugkonzepten (Front-/Heckantrieb) in den drei genannten Fahrmanövern zeigen, dass die Rekuperation in weiten Bereichen der Längsverzögerungen sinnvoll eingesetzt werden kann. Bei der Bremsung in der Kurve führt die Rekuperation an der Vorderachse zu einer deutlichen Reduzierung störender Fahrzeugreaktionen und kann auch bei höheren Querbeschleunigungen verwendet werden. Bei der Rekuperation an der Hinterachse kann es insbesondere auf Niedrigreibwerten bei Bremsungen in der Kurve zu kritischen Fahrzuständen kommen. Durch die Begrenzung des Rekuperationsmomentes bei großen Schlupfwerten kann die Stabilität des Fahrzeugs jedoch sichergestellt werden. Auch die Ergebnisse der Simulationen der anderen Fahrmanöver zeigen, dass bei geringen Schlupfwerten keine wahrnehmbaren fahrdynamischen Unterschiede festzustellen sind.
Fahrerassistenzsystemen mit Umfeldwahrnehmung wird ein hohes Potenzial zur Unfallvermeidung zugeschrieben, wenn diese umfassender und intensiver in die Fahrdynamik von Fahrzeugen eingreifen und weiter vernetzt werden. Diese erweiterten Eingriffsmöglichkeiten erzeugen auch neue Risiken, welche vor der Genehmigung und Zulassung für den öffentlichen Straßenverkehr abgesichert werden müssen. Neuartig ist bei diesen Systemen, dass sie nur über eine Situationsrepräsentation die unfallvermeidenden Handlungen ableiten können. Somit kommt zum Risiko des Versagens von Systemkomponenten, das bereits durch die ISO 26262-Norm zur funktionalen Sicherheit adressiert ist, das Risiko aufgrund einer falschen Interpretation auftretenden, nicht situationsgemaessen Auslösung, z. B. durch Situationskonstellationen, die bei der Entwicklung nicht berücksichtigt wurden und daher in den Funktionsspezifikationen nicht enthalten sind. Um die Anforderungen an Absicherungsmethoden für diese Assistenzsysteme zu identifizieren, werden diese zusammengestellt und der Absicherungsaufwand mit bestehenden Methoden, bspw. aufbauend auf den Anforderungen der ISO 26262, bestimmt. Die Analyse zeigt, dass bisherige Ansätze sowohl hinsichtlich der objektiven Nachweisbarkeit der Vollständigkeit der theoretisch möglichen Situationen Lücken aufweisen als auch hinsichtlich des Umfangs der notwendigen Spezifikationen und deren Prüfung in Versuchen. Aufgrund des daher zu erwartenden Aufwands für den Nachweis eines sicheren Verhaltens der Systeme sind eine Priorisierung von Fahrsituationen und die Gewährleistung einer hohen Übertragbarkeit von Bewertungsergebnissen notwendig. Um die Vollständigkeitsproblematik zu adressieren, wird ein Ansatz vorgestellt, der eine objektive Bewertung und den Vergleich von Fahrsituationen ermöglicht. Abschließend werden die Erkenntnisse zusammengefasst und notwendige weitere Schritte für die Schaffung einer einheitlichen Absicherungsstrategie für Fahrerassistenzsysteme abgeleitet.
Although the bus belongs to the safest traffic means, single accidents can be particularly severe and concern many passengers. Especially in case of fires a high number of injured and killed persons can be the outcome. Fire safety of buses therefore is of high importance. With the increase of synthetic and plastic materials as a material for the interior equipment of buses and coaches because of their ood mechanical properties combined with low weight, the question arises whether the safety level has decreased in case of a fire during the last years - also compared to other means of transport. Because of the combustible plastics and their ability to release a high amount of heat the main fire load in buses is no longer the fuel but the plastic materials which are also often easy to ignite. Besides the flammability of the equipments, the production of smoke, the smoke development and propagation and its toxicity for the people as well as the testing methods and limit values are of interest. For those reasons research projects were initiated on behalf of the German Federal Highway Research Institute. At the one hand the fire behavior of coach interiors was examined in general focusing on fire propagation as well as fire detection and signalling. As result, recommendations with regard to early fire detection systems for the engine compartments and on-board extinguishing equipment were elaborated. At the other hand research is carried out to examine heat release, smoke, smoke propagation and its toxicity due to burning bus interior materials. The paper describes which effective and economically reasonable fire safety requirements for interiors of buses would improve the current situation. Proposals for amendments of current requirements are recommended including the specification of appropriate limit values. In particular, it is taken into consideration which reasonable fire safety standards from other transport sectors, especially the rail sector, should be transferred to buses.
New vehicle types are extensively tested to check almost all factors that influence ride and handling. With reference to the Association of German Car Tuners" (VDAT e.V.) valuations, approximately 10% of all cars in Germany are being modified by their owners. 28 % of those modifications" sales are divergent wheel-tire combinations, 13 % are tuning measures on the chassis suspension or wheel spacers. In almost all cases the singular modifications present a general permission for specific vehicles they have been tested in. Combined tuning measures, however, are often checked by just one inspector, following a procedure of mostly subjective assessment criteria. Today, critical attributes are only being observed, in case a vehicle is involved in an accident and the modifications are identified as crash causal factors or as a cofactor on the development of a crash. For the first time, a field study allows a survey of safety affecting chassis modifications. The test layout has to comply with some basic conditions. Different vehicle concepts with a wide margin of modifications are required to get a high transferability of the results. A total amount of more than 150 tested vehicles serves the same purpose. The tests are limited concerning the installation time of measurement techniques and the requirement that no damage, defilement or immoderate wear of the vehicles are accepted by their owners. Due to such factors as well as the driver Ìs acceptance, the vehicles are controlled by its owners instead of robots or test drivers. For keeping down the driver- influence, the lane has narrow boundaries and the driver has to drive in strictly adherence to the given instructions. After gathering all modifications, as well as static and kinematic parameters like the toe and camber angle, dynamic testing of predominantly lateral dynamics is conducted. Besides standardized tests like the ISO 3888-2 (Obstacle Avoidance) or the ISO 14512 (Braking on Surfaces with Split Coefficient of Friction), to test the influence of modified kingpin offsets caused by wheel spacers, some deviant tests are conducted. Those are required due to the demand of objective test results for road tests with vertical induced stimulation of the chassis suspension. Hence, new tests on corner braking with and without vertical stimulation have been developed. The interpretation of data includes thresholds, e.g. the maximum entrance velocity without hitting cones, on the one hand, and the analysis of characteristics of data concerning time and frequency range, "1-second values" and peak response times on the other hand. Besides the thresholds as indicators for the achievable velocities, which are mainly affected by friction coefficients, the vehicle reaction in the course of time characterizes the vehicle reaction in the threshold range and consequently the operational demands on the driver. The field study has started and promises the first long-range analysis of chassis modifications. The results offer a basis for hypothesis and resultant further test layouts for oncoming studies of the identified critical tuning measures.
The ASSESS project is a collaborative project that develops test procedures for pre-crash safety systems like Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB). One key criterion for the effectiveness of e.g. AEB is reduction in collision speed compared to baseline scenarios without AEB. The speed reduction for a given system can only be determined in real world tests that will end with a collision. Soft targets that are crashable up to velocities of 80 km/h are state of the art for these assessments, but ordinary balloon cars are usually stationary targets. The ASSESS project goes one step further and defines scenarios with moving targets. These scenarios define vehicle speeds of up to 100 km/h, different collision scenarios and relative collision speeds of up to 80km/h. This paper describes the development of a propulsion system for a soft target that aims to be used with these demanding scenario specifications. The Federal Highway Research Institute- (BASt-) approach to move the target is a self-driving small cart. The cart is controlled either by a driver (open-loop control via remote-control) or by a computer (closed-loop control). Its weight is limited to achieve a good crashability without damages to the test vehicle. To the extent of our knowledge BASt- approach is unique in this field (other carts cannot move at such high velocities or are not crashable). This paper describes in detail the challenges and solutions that were found both for the mechanical construction and the implementation of the control and safety system. One example for the mechanical challenges is e.g. the position of the vehicle- center of gravity (CG). An optimum compromise had to be found between a low CG oriented to the front of the vehicle (good for driveability) and a high CG oriented to the rear of the vehicle (good for crashability). The soft target itself which is also developed within the ASSESS project will not be covered in detail as this is work of a project partner. Publications on this will follow. The paper also shows first test results, describes current limitations and gives an outlook. It is expected that the presented test tools for AEB and other pre-crash safety systems is introduced in the future into consumer testing (NCAP) as well as regulatory testing.
The objectives of the FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) project are to answer the remaining open questions identified in earlier projects (such as understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of force based metrics and barrier deformation based metrics, confirmation of specific compatibility issues such as structural interaction, investigation of force matching) and to finalise the frontal impact test procedures required to assess compatibility. Research strategies and priorities were based on earlier research programs and the FIMCAR accident data analysis. The identified real world safety issues were used to develop a list of compatibility characteristics which were then prioritised within the consortium. This list was the basis for evaluating the different test candidates. This analysis resulted in the combination of the Full Width Deformable Barrier test (FWDB) with compatibility metrics and the existing Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) as described in UN-ECE Regulation 94 with additional cabin integrity requirement as being proposed as the FIMCAR assessment approach. The proposed frontal impact assessment approach addresses many of the issues identified by the FIMCAR consortium but not all frontal impact and compatibility issues could be addressed.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and the final report to the steering committee on frontal impact [Faerber 2007] and the FP5 VC-COMPAT[Edwards 2007] project activities, two test approaches were identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis will be performed. In the FIMCAR Deliverable D 3.1 [Adolph 2013] the development and assessment of criteria and associated performance limits for the full width test procedure were reported. In this Deliverable D3.2 analyses of the test data (full width tests, car-to-car tests and component tests), further development and validation of the full width assessment protocol and development of the load cell and load cell wall specification are reported. The FIMCAR full-width assessment procedure consists of a 50 km/h test against the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB). The Load Cell Wall behind the deformable element assesses whether or not important Energy Absorbing Structures are within the Common Interaction Zone as defined based on the US part 581 zone. The metric evaluates the row forces and requires that the forces directly above and below the centre line of the Common Interaction Zone exceed a minimum threshold. Analysis of the load spreading showed that metrics that rely on sum forces of rows and columns are within acceptable tolerances. Furthermore it was concluded that the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the FWDB test is acceptable. The FWDB test was shown to be capable to detect lower load paths that are beneficial in car-to-car impacts.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were to review existing full-width test procedures and their discussed compatibility metrics, to report recent activities and findings with respect to full-width assessment procedures and to assess test procedures and metrics. Starting with a review of previous work, candidate metrics and associated performance limits to assess a vehicle- structural interaction potential, in particular its structural alignment, have been developed for both the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB) and Full Width Rigid Barrier (FWRB) tests. Initial work was performed to develop a concept to assess a vehicle- frontal force matching. However, based on the accident analyses performed within FIMCAR frontal force matching was not evaluated as a first priority and thus in line with FIMCAR strategy the focus was put on the development of metrics for the assessment of structural interaction which was evaluated as a first priority.
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
The objective of this deliverable is to describe the expected influence of the candidate test procedures developed in FIMCAR for frontal impact on other impact types. The other impact types of primary interest are front-to-side impacts, collisions with road restraint systems (e.g. guardrails), and heavy goods vehicle impacts. These collision types were chosen as they involve structures that can be adapted to improve safety. Collisions with vulnerable road users (VRU) were not explicitly investigated in FIMCAR. It is expected that the vehicle structures of interest in FIMCAR can be designed into a VRU friendly shell. Information used for this deliverable comes from simulations and car-to-car crash tests conducted in FIMCAR or review of previous research. Three test configurations (full width, offset, and moving deformable barriers) were the input to the FIMCAR selection process. There are three different types of offset tests and two different full width tests. During the project test procedures could be divided into three groups that provide different influences or outcomes on vehicle designs: 1. The ODB barrier provides a method to assess part of the vehicles energy absorption capabilities and compartment test in one test. 2. The FWRB and FWDB have similar capabilities to control structural alignment, further assess energy absorption capabilities, and promote the improvements in the occupant restraint system for high deceleration impacts. 3. The PDB and MPDB can be used to promote better load spreading in the vehicle structures, in addition to assessing energy absorption and occupant compartment strength in an offset configuration. The consortium selected the ODB and FWDB as the two best candidates for short term application in international rulemaking. The review of how all candidates would affect vehicle performance in other impacts (beside front-to-front vehicle or frontal impacts with fixed obstacles) however is reported in this deliverable to support the benefit analysis reported in FIMCAR. The grouping presented above is used to discuss all five test candidates using similarities between certain tests and thereby simplify the discussion.