Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (69)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (4)
- Buch (Monographie) (2)
- Bericht (1)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Schlagworte
- Severity (accid, injury) (77) (entfernen)
Institut
In der amtlichen Statistik der Unfälle wird zwischen "Abkommen von der Fahrbahn nach links" und "Abkommen nach rechts" unterschieden. Jene Unfälle sind nicht erfasst, bei denen es zunächst auf der Fahrbahn zu einem leichten Zusammenstoß kommt, infolge dessen ein Auto von der Fahrbahn abkommt, wobei unter Umständen schwere Unfallfolgen entstehen. Im Jahre 1984 wurden unter Unfallart "Abkommen" 2.092 Getötete = 28,5 % aller im Straßenverkehr 1984 Getöteten ausgewiesen. Die Verteilung der Unfälle auf Innerortsstraßen, Landstraßen und Autobahnen wird angegeben. Die Unfallschwere beim Abkommen nach rechts ist bedeutend größer als beim Abkommen nach links. Mehr als 80 % der abkommenden Fahrzeuge verlassen die Fahrbahn unter 20 Grad. Die größere Unfallschwere beim Abkommen nach rechts wird auf Fehlen von Schutzplanken zurückgeführt. Der günstige Einfluss von Randmarkierungen wird nicht erwähnt. An der Zahl schwerer Unfallfolgen haben Bäume an Landstraßen einen 50 %-Anteil. Sie sollten 5 m, in Außenkurven 10 m vom Fahrbahnrand entfernt sein, andernfalls durch Buschgruppen ersetzt oder durch Schutzplanken geschützt werden. Würde man durch wirksame Maßnahmen die Unfälle durch Abkommen nach rechts auf die Zahl der Unfälle durch Abkommen nach links reduzieren, würden sich die volkswirtschaftlichen Kosten um rund. 3 Mrd. DM jährlich vermindern.
Seit der Herausgabe der HLB 1957 (Hinweise für die Anordnung und Ausführung von senkrechten Leiteinrichtungen an Bundesfernstraßen) haben sich Schutzplanken immer mehr zur Verhinderung schwerer Unfälle bewährt. Die neuen Richtlinien für passive Schutzeinrichtungen berücksichtigen die Erfahrungen einer langen Bewährungszeit. Die Entwicklung führte von der streckenweisen Installation zur allgemeinen Anwendung, der einfachen Schutzplanke zur einfachen Distanzschutzplanke und zur doppelten Distanzschutzplanke, wobei nach jeder der Änderungen ein erheblicher Gewinn nachgewiesen wurde. Schutzplanken werden mit Erfolg als Absturzsicherungen auf Brücken verwendet. Am Fahrbahnrand haben sie die Zahl der Unfälle reduziert und den Anteil schwerer Unfälle vermindert. Das neue Merkblatt enthält Hinweise für das Aufstellen von Schutzplanken, Maßnahmen zum Vermeiden von Versagen der Keilverschlüsse und für den Anprallschutz von gestürzten Zweiradfahrern an Schutzplankenpfosten.
Für die Länder Deutschland, Frankreich, Italien, Großbritannien, Niederlande, Belgien, Österreich und Schweiz werden die Entwicklung der Netzlängen der Autobahnen, die Fahrleistungen und die tödlich Verunglückten verglichen. Das Maß für das Risiko ist die Getötetenrate. Es zeigt sich, dass das Sicherheitsniveau auf deutschen Autobahnen im internationalen Vergleich in einer mittleren Position liegt, jedoch noch deutlich von dem in Großbritannien, der Schweiz und den Niederlanden erreichten Stand entfernt ist.
In der Bundesrepublik Deutschland beträgt der Anteil der Fußgänger an den Verkehrstoten derzeit circa 13 Prozent. Um die Verletzungsschwere bei Fahrzeug-Fußgänger-Kollisionen zu reduzieren, wurde 1996 ein vom "European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee" (EEVC) ausgearbeitetes Testverfahren zum Fußgängerschutz als europäischer Gesetzentwurf (III/502/96 EN) veröffentlicht. Das Testverfahren schreibt den Einsatz verschiedener Körperteilmodelle für die Bereiche Kopf, Oberschenkel und Bein zur Prüfung der Fahrzeugvorderwagen vor. Diese Stoßkörper müssen bei der Prüfung verschiedene Beanspruchungsgrenzwerte einhalten. Das vorliegende Projekt befasst sich mit der fußgängerfreundlichen Gestaltung von Fahrzeugfronten unter Berücksichtigung des von der EEVC WG10 ausgearbeiteten Testverfahrens sowie dessen Überarbeitung durch die EEVC WG17. Es werden zunächst eine Mittelklasselimousine und eine Großraumlimousine nach dem Prüfverfahren der EEVC getestet. Auf Basis der Versuchsergebnisse wird die Mittelklasselimousine mit dem Ziel modifiziert, die Prüfergebnisse zu verbessern. Anhand der Analyse der daraufhin realisierten Fahrzeugoptimierung wird anschließend das EEVC Testverfahren einer kritischen Betrachtung unterzogen. Dafür werden Optimierungsmaßnahmen an Fahrzeugen, die zu Verbesserungen der Ergebnisse des EEVC Testverfahrens führen, auf ihre Wirkung bei realen Fußgängerunfällen bewertet. Weiterhin werden Anmerkungen zu der praktischen Durchführung des Testverfahrens gemacht, wobei auch Fahrzeuge mit besonderen Konstruktionsmaßnahmen, wie zum Beispiel aktive Schutzsysteme, berücksichtigt werden.
Thorax injury is one of main causes of serious injury in frontal collisions, especially for elderly car occupants. The anthropometric test device (ATD) THOR‐M provides chest deflection measurements at multiple locations, to assess the risk of thorax injury. For this purpose e, risk functions are needed that relate the potential criteria based on multipoint chest deflection measurement to in jury risk. Different thorax injury criteria and risk functions for THOR have been proposed [2‐3]. The criteria and functions are based on the traditional approach to developing injury risk functions using matched ATD and PMHS tests by relating the injury (number of fractures) to injury criteria. Regarding these studies, some limitations have been identified, in particular concerning the loading conditions of the data used (mainly 3‐point‐belt loading, high loading severity, out‐of‐date ATD versions. To extend the data set and overcome these limitations, a new approach for improved thorax injury criteria was applied within the EC‐funded project SENIORS. The new approach is based on matched frontal impact sled computer simulations with a model representing the latest THOR‐M ATD version, and matching simulations with a human body model (HBM) representing an elderly car occupant.
Accidents between right turning trucks and straight riding cyclists often show massive consequences. Accident severity is much higher than in other accidents. The situation is critical especially due to the fact that, in spite of the six mirrors that are mandatory for ensuring a minimum field of sight for the truck drivers, cyclists in some situations cannot be seen or are not seen by the driver. Either the cyclist is overlooked or is in a blind spot area that results from the turning manoeuvre of the truck and its articulation if it is a truck trailer or truck semitrailer combination. At present driver assistance systems are discussed that can support the driver in the turning situation by giving a warning when cyclists are riding parallel to the truck just before or in the turning manoeuvre. Such systems would generally bear a high potential to avoid accidents of right turning trucks and cyclists no matter if they ride on the road or on a parallel bicycle path. However, performance requirements for such turning assist systems or even test procedures do not exist yet. This paper describes the development of a testing method and requirements for turning assist systems for trucks. The starting point of each development of test procedures is an analysis of accident data. A general study of accident figures determines the size of the problem. In-depth accident data is evaluated case by case in order to find out which are representative critical situations. These findings serve to determine characteristic parameters (e.g. boundary conditions, trajectories of truck and cyclist, speeds during the critical situation, impact points). Based on these parameters and technical feasibility by current sensor and actuator technology, representative test scenarios and pass/fail-criteria are defined. The outcome of the study is an overview of the accident situation between right turning trucks and straight driving cyclists in Germany as well as a corresponding test procedure for driver assistance systems that at this first stage will be informing or warning the driver. This test procedure is meant to be the basis for an international discussion on introducing turning assist systems in vehicle regulations.
Upcoming test procedures and regulations consider the use of Q-dummies. Especially Q6 and Q10 will be introduced to assess the safety of child occupants in vehicle rear seats. Therefore detailed knowledge of these dummies is important to improve safety. As recent studies have shown, chest deflection measurements of both dummies are influenced by parameters like belt geometry. This could lead to a non optimized design of child restraint systems (CRS) and belt systems. The objective of this study is to obtain a more detailed understanding of the sensitivity of chest measurements to restraint parameters and to investigate the possibilities of chest acceleration as an alternative for the assessment of chest injury risks. A study of frontal impact sled tests was performed with Q6 and Q10 in a generic rear seat environment on a bench. Belt parameters like modified belt attachment locations were varied. For the Q6 dummy, different positioning settings of the CRS (booster with backrest) and of the dummy itself were investigated. The Q10 dummy was seated on a booster cushion. Here the position of the upper belt anchorage point was varied. To simulate the influence of vehicle rotation in the ODB crash configuration, the bench was pre-rotated on the sled in additional tests with the Q10. This configuration was tested with and without pretensioner and load limiter. Chest deflection in Q6 showed a high sensitivity to changes in positioning of the CRS and the dummy itself. A more slouched position of the CRS or dummy resulted in a reduction of measured chest deflection, whereas chest acceleration increased for a more slouched position of the CRS. Chest deflection in Q10 is sensitive to belt geometry as already shown in other studies. In a more outboard position of the shoulder belt anchorage the measured chest deflection is higher. Chest acceleration shows the opposite tendency, which is highest for the rearmost location of the upper belt anchorage. On a pre-rotated bench the highest chest deflection within this test series was observed without load limiter/pretensioner and an outboard belt position. By optimizing the belt location and the use of pretensioner/load limier the chest deflection was significantly reduced. For the Q6 a criterion based on chest acceleration as well as deflection measured at two locations might be the most reliable approach, which requires further research with an additional upper deflection sensor. In the Q10 the measured chest deflection does not always correctly reflect the severity of chest loading. The deflection is depending on initial belt position and restraint parameters as well as test conditions, which result in different directions of belt migration. A3ms chest acceleration might be a better indicator for severity of chest loading independent of different conditions like belt geometries. However, in some cases the benefit of an optimized restraint system could only be shown by deflection. These findings suggest that further research is needed to identify a chest injury assessment method, which could be based on deflection as well as acceleration or other parameters related to belt to occupant interaction.
Frontal impact is still the most relevant impact direction in terms of injury causation amongst car occupants. Especially for car-to-car frontal impacts the mass ratio between the involved vehicles has a significant impact on the injury risk (the heavier the opponent car the higher the injury risk). In order to address this issue frontal Mobile Deformable Barrier test procedures have been developed world-wide (for example the MPDB procedure that was fully described during the FIMCAR Project). The objective of this study was to investigate how vehicles of different weight classes perform in a mobile barrier test procedure compared to a fixed barrier test procedure (the full width rigid and offset deformable barrier test). Beyond that, the influence of vehicle mass and vehicle deformation on injuries was evaluated based on real world accident data. Five vehicle types were selected and tested in a fixed offset test procedure (ODB), a full width rigid barrier test procedure (FWRB) and a mobile offset test procedure (MPDB). For the accident analyses data from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) was evaluated with a focus on MAIS 2+ injured belted front row car (UN-R 94 compliant cars) occupants in frontal impact accidents. Test data indicates higher dummy loadings, in particular for the head acceleration and chest acceleration, in the MPDB test for the vehicles with a mass lighter than the trolley (1,500 kg) compared to the FWRB test. The trend of increased vehicle stiffness (especially illustrated by tests with the MPDB and small cars) shows the need of a further improvement of passive restraint systems to reduce the occupant loading and with it the injury risk. The analyzed GIDAS data confirm the higher injury risk for occupants in cars with an accident weight of less than 1,500 kg compared to those with a crash weight above 1,500 kg in car-to-car and car-to-object or car-to-HGV, respectively. Furthermore the injury risk increases with decreasing mass ratio (i.e., the opponent car is heavier) in car-to-car accidents. Independent from the higher injury risk, the risk for passenger compartment intrusion in frontal impact appears not to be independent on the crash weight of the car.
The Intersection 2020 project was initiated to develop a test procedure for Automatic Emergency Braking systems in intersection car-to-car scenarios to be transferred to Euro NCAP. The project aims to address current road traffic accidents on European roads and therefore sets a priority of the identification of the most important car-to-car accidents and Use Cases. Taking into account technological and practical limitations, Test Scenarios are derived from the Use Cases in a later stage of the project. This paper presents parts of a larger study and provides an overview of common car-to-vehicle(at least four wheels) collision types at junctions in Europe and specifies seven Accident Scenarios from which the three scenarios “Straight Crossing Paths (SCP)”, “Left Turn Across Path – Opposite Direction Conflict (LTAP/OD)” and “Left Turn Across Path – Lateral Direction (LTAP/LD)” are most important due to their high relevance regarding severe car-to-car accidents. Technical details about crash parameters such as collision and initial speeds are delivered. The analysis work performed is input for the definition and selection of the Use Cases as well as for the project’s benefit estimation. The numbers of accidents and fatalities in accidents at intersections involving a passenger car were shown per intersection type. In both statistics, it was found that accidents at crossroads and T- or staggered junctions are of highest relevance, followed by roundabouts. Focusing on accidents at intersections between one passenger car and another road user shows that around one-third of all accidents and related fatalities could have been assigned to car-to-PTW accidents and one-fifth of all accidents and fatalities to car-to-car accidents. Regarding car-to-car accidents with at least serious injury outcome 38% out of 34,489 car-to-car accidents happened at intersections. These figures correspond to 18% of the fatalities (4,236 fatalities in total). Considering all intersection types, around half of all related accidents happened in urban environments whereas this number decreased to one-third of all fatalities. Further, the proportion of road fatalities per country occurring at intersections varies widely across the EU. Also, there are proportionately more fatalities in daylight or twilight conditions at junctions. Use Cases are supposed to be derived from Accident Scenarios and by adding detailed information for example about the road layout, right-of-way and the vehicle trajectories prior to the collision. Instead of applying cluster algorithms to the accident data, a pragmatic approach was finally preferred to create them. Note: Use Cases serve as an intermediate step between the Accident Scenarios and the Test Scenarios which describe the actual testing conditions. Finally, 74 Use Cases were identified. This large number indicates the complexity of intersection crashes due to the combination of several parameters.
Bedingt durch ihre Definition - mindestens 24-stündiger Klinikaufenthalt - umfasst die Kategorie der Schwerverletzten in der amtlichen Verkehrsunfallstatistik eine große Breite tatsächlicher Verletzungsschweregrade. Durch das hohe persönliche Leid sowie die bedeutsamen volkswirtschaftlichen Kosten sind innerhalb dieser Gruppe die Schwerstverletzten von besonderem Interesse. Es werden drei Studien der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) vorgestellt, in denen auf Grundlage verschiedener Datenquellen Verletzungsmuster und Verletzungsschwere in Zusammenhang mit Parametern des Unfallgeschehens gebracht wurden. Zusammengefasst zeigt sich, dass (a) die Zahl der Schwerstverletzten sich in den letzten Jahren nicht in gleichem Maße reduziert hat, wie die Zahlen Schwerverletzter und Getöteter; (b) sich über verschiedene Datenquellen (GIDAS, TraumaRegister DGU, Rettungsdienst, Polizei) ähnliche Verletzungsmuster in Abhängigkeit der Verkehrsteilnahme zeigen; (c) durch die Verbindung von medizinischen Daten des TraumaRegisters mit Daten der Polizei gute Voraussetzungen für eine umfangreiche Erfassung Schwerstverletzter in Deutschland geschaffen werden könnten.