Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (252)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (123)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (111)
- Arbeitspapier (13)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (9)
- Bericht (5)
- Sonstiges (1)
Schlagworte
- Safety (514) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (243)
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (115)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (89)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (79)
- Abteilung Brücken- und Ingenieurbau (22)
- Stabstelle Presse und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (12)
- Präsident (6)
- Abteilung Straßenbautechnik (5)
- Stabstelle Forschungscontrolling, Qualitätsmanagement (2)
The 2BeSafe project (2-Wheeler Behaviour and Safety) is a collaborative project (co financed by the European Commission) that aims to study the naturalistic behaviour of Powered-Two-Wheeler (PTW) riders in normal and critical riding situations. That includes the interaction between PTW riders and other road users and possible conflicts between them. One of the predominant causes of accidents involving PTWs is that PTWs are often overlooked by other road users. One task of the project lead by BASt therefore deals with possible improvements in conspicuity and the development of recommendations. Particularly using the findings of the studies on conflict situations, promising lighting arrangements to enhance conspicuity of PTWs during the day and at night are selected. An abstract recognizing pattern for PTWs is defined, enabling other road users (e.g. car drivers) to clearly identify riders. Lamps and outfit like lighting configurations of different colours, different helmet lights, reflect / luminescent clothing parts and retro-reflective markings are designed and manufactured. Then, the different solutions are tested in a laboratory setting using experimental motorcycles together with riders to which the equipment is fitted. As result a proposal for a uniform signal pattern or lamp configuration in the front of all motorcycles and riders will be outlined. The contribution first gives a short overview of the topics of the research project that deal with conflicts and their connection with poor conspicuity and then presents in detail the methods used in the activities concerning solutions for the improvement of conspicuity together with first results.
Durch den zukünftig zu erwartenden Anstieg des Radverkehrsanteils am Gesamtverkehrsaufkommen und der Veränderung des Fahrzeugkollektivs sowie der Nutzergruppen durch die Zunahme von Elektrofahrrädern werden die Anforderungen an die Verkehrssicherheit im Radverkehr kontinuierlich steigen. Aus diesem Grund ist in dem vorliegenden Forschungsprojekt unter Berücksichtigung verschiedener Fachdisziplinen untersucht worden, welche Sicherheitskenngrößen im Radverkehr neben den bisher üblich verwendeten Unfallkennwerten geeignet sind, die Verkehrssicherheit zukünftig zu bewerten und darzustellen. Zur Identifikation von "neuen" bzw. zusätzlichen Sicherheitskenngrößen wurde eine Struktur zur Differenzierung von Sicherheitskenngrößen für unterschiedliche Stufen einer Fahrradfahrt von der Quelle bis zum Ziel bzw. einem potenziellen Unfall erstellt. Die Ergebnisse wurden in einem Expertenworkshop vor- und zur Diskussion gestellt und im Nachgang entsprechend der Diskussionsergebnisse überarbeitet und angepasst. Durch Heranziehen von Verkehrs- und Unfalldaten mit Radverkehrsbeteiligung aus abgeschlossenen (Forschungs-)Projekten wird für den verkehrsplanerischen Bereich in Anwendungsbeispielen dargestellt, wie für unterschiedliche Stufen einer Fahrradfahrt durch Kombination von bestehenden Unfallkennwerten und Sicherheitsindikatoren "neue" Sicherheitskenngrößen abgeleitet werden können. Aufgrund eines fehlenden einheitlichen Verkehrssicherheitsverständnisses der unterschiedlichen Fachdisziplinen und der teilweise schwachen empirischen Datengrundlage, konnte keine Grundlage zur Identifikation von interdisziplinären Sicherheitskenngrößen geschaffen werden. Aus diesem Grund beschränken sich die Ergebnisse primär auf den Bereich der Verkehrsplanung. Für zukünftige Untersuchungen wird daher empfohlen, auf Grundlage der vorliegenden Ergebnisse eine Methodik zur interdisziplinären Bewertung der Verkehrssicherheit im Radverkehr zu erarbeiten.
Ziel des Projektes war es, bedingt durch die wachsende Anzahl der im Verkehr befindlichen elektrisch und hybrid-elektrisch betriebenen Fahrzeuge, notwendige Anpassungen der periodisch technischen Überwachung zu erarbeiten. Dazu wurden von verschiedenen Fahrzeugen die relevanten Bauteile des elektrischen Antriebsstrangs identifiziert und deren Ausfallverhalten analysiert. Um die Degradationsauswirkungen einzelner Bauteile und Funktionen auf das gesamte System bestimmen zu können, hat die FSD ein Simulationsmodell erstellt. Die daraus ermittelten Ergebnisse waren Grundlage für die Bestimmung verkehrssicherheits- und umweltkritischer Bauteile sowie deren Funktionen. Diese Modellaussagen wurden mit Realversuchen an Fahrzeugen validiert. Zusätzlich konnten in einem Feldversuch 2.560 Fahrzeuge mit elektrischem Antriebsstrang untersucht werden. Aus diesen Ergebnissen lassen sich Änderungsvorschläge für die Untersuchungen und Vorgaben ableiten. Dafür ist für einen Großteil dieser Untersuchungen die Nutzung von Diagnosedaten eine geeignete Möglichkeit. Die 47. Verordnung zur Änderung straßenverkehrsrechtlicher Vorschriften berücksichtigt bereits an vielen Stellen die neuen Antriebskonzepte. Von daher werden lediglich geringe Anpassungen in der StVZO für -§ 19 und den Beispielkatalog dazu, -§ 29, Anlage VIIIa, Anlage VIIId sowie die HU-Richtlinie vorgeschlagen. Für die Durchführung der Untersuchungspunkte zum HV-System ist die Entwicklung einer Hochvolt-Richtlinie empfehlenswert. Einige wichtige Prüfverfahren lassen sich derzeit technisch noch nicht umsetzen. Dazu sind Änderungen der internationalen Bau- und Betriebsvorschriften notwendig. Diese werden bei der EU/UNECE anzuregen sein. Es besteht über dieses Projekt hinaus weiterhin Forschungsbedarf, um sich intensiv mit diesen Fahrzeugen zu befassen und deren Weiterentwicklung zu beobachten, damit notwendige Auswirkungen auf die PTI rechtzeitig erkannt werden können.
Aktive Systeme der passiven Fahrzeugsicherheit zum Fußgängerschutz, sogenannte crash-aktive Fußgängerschutzsysteme, werden seit 2005 zur Erfüllung der gesetzlichen Anforderungen (siehe Verordnung (EG) Nr. 78/2009 und 631/2009) in Serienfahrzeugen eingesetzt. Diese crash-aktiven Fußgängerschutzsysteme stellen im Gegensatz zu den rein passiven Systemen nur eine instationäre Lösung dar. Da die innerhalb der gesetzlichen Anforderungen definierten Testverfahren zur Bewertung stationärer Systeme entwickelt wurden, können derzeit mögliche Risiken instationärer Systeme nicht berücksichtigt werden. Im Rahmen dieses Forschungsprojektes soll ein Bewertungsverfahren für diese crash-aktiven Fußgängerschutzsysteme entwickelt werden, welches das reale Potential dieser Systeme möglichst gut wiedergibt. Basis hierfür soll eine umfangreiche Untersuchung zusätzlicher Risiken bilden. Die hier untersuchten instationären Schutzmaßnahmen werden nur im Falle eines Fahrzeuganpralls gegen Fußgänger aktiviert, der daher zuverlässig erkannt werden muss. Für die hierfür eingesetzten, kontaktbasierten Sensorsysteme stellen Fußgänger mit geringen Lasteinträgen in die Fahrzeugfront eine große Herausforderung dar. Die Lasteinträge hängen von zahlreichen Faktoren, wie bspw. der Höhe der entsprechenden Krafteinleitungspfade sowie der Größe und dem Gewichts des Fußgängers, ab. Mit Hilfe von umfangreichen Anprallversuchen und -simulationen wird gezeigt, dass die bisher eingesetzten Prüfkörper nur zum Teil für die Erfüllung dieser Anforderungen geeignet sind. Für ein geeignetes Prüfverfahren müssen daher neue Prüfkörper entwickelt werden. Durch die Aktivierung der Schutzmaßnahme soll bei den crash-aktiven Systemen vor allem das Verletzungsrisiko beim Kopfanprall verringert werden. Hierfür wird häufig die hintere Motorhaubenkante angehoben, um zusätzlichen Deformationsfreiraum zur Verfügung zu stellen. Die Haubenanhebung kann jedoch auch in zusätzlichen Verletzungsrisiken resultieren, bspw. durch die exponierte hintere Haubenkante oder die Verringerung des Deformationsfreiraums in Folge des Oberkörperanpralls. Ein Ersatzprüfverfahren zur Bewertung der Haubendeformation mit Hilfe des Hüftimpaktors wird vorgestellt. Ein hybrides Testverfahren bestehend aus Simulation und Versuch eignet sich für eine objektive Bewertung dieser Systeme, wobei die entsprechenden Versuchsparameter mit Hilfe der vorherigen Simulation bestimmt werden können.
The objectives of the FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) project are to answer the remaining open questions identified in earlier projects (such as understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of force based metrics and barrier deformation based metrics, confirmation of specific compatibility issues such as structural interaction, investigation of force matching) and to finalise the frontal impact test procedures required to assess compatibility. Research strategies and priorities were based on earlier research programs and the FIMCAR accident data analysis. The identified real world safety issues were used to develop a list of compatibility characteristics which were then prioritised within the consortium. This list was the basis for evaluating the different test candidates. This analysis resulted in the combination of the Full Width Deformable Barrier test (FWDB) with compatibility metrics and the existing Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) as described in UN-ECE Regulation 94 with additional cabin integrity requirement as being proposed as the FIMCAR assessment approach. The proposed frontal impact assessment approach addresses many of the issues identified by the FIMCAR consortium but not all frontal impact and compatibility issues could be addressed.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and the final report to the steering committee on frontal impact [Faerber 2007] and the FP5 VC-COMPAT[Edwards 2007] project activities, two test approaches were identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis will be performed. In the FIMCAR Deliverable D 3.1 [Adolph 2013] the development and assessment of criteria and associated performance limits for the full width test procedure were reported. In this Deliverable D3.2 analyses of the test data (full width tests, car-to-car tests and component tests), further development and validation of the full width assessment protocol and development of the load cell and load cell wall specification are reported. The FIMCAR full-width assessment procedure consists of a 50 km/h test against the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB). The Load Cell Wall behind the deformable element assesses whether or not important Energy Absorbing Structures are within the Common Interaction Zone as defined based on the US part 581 zone. The metric evaluates the row forces and requires that the forces directly above and below the centre line of the Common Interaction Zone exceed a minimum threshold. Analysis of the load spreading showed that metrics that rely on sum forces of rows and columns are within acceptable tolerances. Furthermore it was concluded that the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the FWDB test is acceptable. The FWDB test was shown to be capable to detect lower load paths that are beneficial in car-to-car impacts.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were to review existing full-width test procedures and their discussed compatibility metrics, to report recent activities and findings with respect to full-width assessment procedures and to assess test procedures and metrics. Starting with a review of previous work, candidate metrics and associated performance limits to assess a vehicle- structural interaction potential, in particular its structural alignment, have been developed for both the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB) and Full Width Rigid Barrier (FWRB) tests. Initial work was performed to develop a concept to assess a vehicle- frontal force matching. However, based on the accident analyses performed within FIMCAR frontal force matching was not evaluated as a first priority and thus in line with FIMCAR strategy the focus was put on the development of metrics for the assessment of structural interaction which was evaluated as a first priority.
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
The objective of this deliverable is to describe the expected influence of the candidate test procedures developed in FIMCAR for frontal impact on other impact types. The other impact types of primary interest are front-to-side impacts, collisions with road restraint systems (e.g. guardrails), and heavy goods vehicle impacts. These collision types were chosen as they involve structures that can be adapted to improve safety. Collisions with vulnerable road users (VRU) were not explicitly investigated in FIMCAR. It is expected that the vehicle structures of interest in FIMCAR can be designed into a VRU friendly shell. Information used for this deliverable comes from simulations and car-to-car crash tests conducted in FIMCAR or review of previous research. Three test configurations (full width, offset, and moving deformable barriers) were the input to the FIMCAR selection process. There are three different types of offset tests and two different full width tests. During the project test procedures could be divided into three groups that provide different influences or outcomes on vehicle designs: 1. The ODB barrier provides a method to assess part of the vehicles energy absorption capabilities and compartment test in one test. 2. The FWRB and FWDB have similar capabilities to control structural alignment, further assess energy absorption capabilities, and promote the improvements in the occupant restraint system for high deceleration impacts. 3. The PDB and MPDB can be used to promote better load spreading in the vehicle structures, in addition to assessing energy absorption and occupant compartment strength in an offset configuration. The consortium selected the ODB and FWDB as the two best candidates for short term application in international rulemaking. The review of how all candidates would affect vehicle performance in other impacts (beside front-to-front vehicle or frontal impacts with fixed obstacles) however is reported in this deliverable to support the benefit analysis reported in FIMCAR. The grouping presented above is used to discuss all five test candidates using similarities between certain tests and thereby simplify the discussion.
Accident analysis
(2014)
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the EC funded FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in today- research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The specific objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were: - Determine if previously identified compatibility issues are still relevant in current vehicle fleet: Structural interaction, Frontal force matching, Compartment strength in particular for light cars. - Determine nature of injuries and injury mechanisms: Body regions injured o Injury mechanism: Contact with intrusion, Contact, Deceleration / restraint induced. The main data sources for this report were the CCIS and Stats 19 databases from Great Britain and the GIDAS database from Germany. The different sampling and reporting schemes for the detailed databases (CCIS & GIDAS) sometimes do not allow for direct comparisons of the results. However the databases are complementary " CCIS captures more severe collisions highlighting structure and injury issues while GIDAS provides detailed data for a broader range of crash severities. The following results represent the critical points for further development of test procedures in FIMCAR.