Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (72)
- Buch (Monographie) (71)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (23)
- Arbeitspapier (10)
- Bericht (3)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (2)
Schlagworte
- Vehicle (181) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (80)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (64)
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (17)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (15)
- Stabstelle Presse und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (6)
- Präsident (3)
- Abteilung Brücken- und Ingenieurbau (2)
- Abteilung Straßenbautechnik (2)
- Stabstelle Forschungscontrolling, Qualitätsmanagement (1)
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
The objective of this deliverable is to describe the expected influence of the candidate test procedures developed in FIMCAR for frontal impact on other impact types. The other impact types of primary interest are front-to-side impacts, collisions with road restraint systems (e.g. guardrails), and heavy goods vehicle impacts. These collision types were chosen as they involve structures that can be adapted to improve safety. Collisions with vulnerable road users (VRU) were not explicitly investigated in FIMCAR. It is expected that the vehicle structures of interest in FIMCAR can be designed into a VRU friendly shell. Information used for this deliverable comes from simulations and car-to-car crash tests conducted in FIMCAR or review of previous research. Three test configurations (full width, offset, and moving deformable barriers) were the input to the FIMCAR selection process. There are three different types of offset tests and two different full width tests. During the project test procedures could be divided into three groups that provide different influences or outcomes on vehicle designs: 1. The ODB barrier provides a method to assess part of the vehicles energy absorption capabilities and compartment test in one test. 2. The FWRB and FWDB have similar capabilities to control structural alignment, further assess energy absorption capabilities, and promote the improvements in the occupant restraint system for high deceleration impacts. 3. The PDB and MPDB can be used to promote better load spreading in the vehicle structures, in addition to assessing energy absorption and occupant compartment strength in an offset configuration. The consortium selected the ODB and FWDB as the two best candidates for short term application in international rulemaking. The review of how all candidates would affect vehicle performance in other impacts (beside front-to-front vehicle or frontal impacts with fixed obstacles) however is reported in this deliverable to support the benefit analysis reported in FIMCAR. The grouping presented above is used to discuss all five test candidates using similarities between certain tests and thereby simplify the discussion.
Accident analysis
(2014)
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the EC funded FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in today- research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The specific objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were: - Determine if previously identified compatibility issues are still relevant in current vehicle fleet: Structural interaction, Frontal force matching, Compartment strength in particular for light cars. - Determine nature of injuries and injury mechanisms: Body regions injured o Injury mechanism: Contact with intrusion, Contact, Deceleration / restraint induced. The main data sources for this report were the CCIS and Stats 19 databases from Great Britain and the GIDAS database from Germany. The different sampling and reporting schemes for the detailed databases (CCIS & GIDAS) sometimes do not allow for direct comparisons of the results. However the databases are complementary " CCIS captures more severe collisions highlighting structure and injury issues while GIDAS provides detailed data for a broader range of crash severities. The following results represent the critical points for further development of test procedures in FIMCAR.
The off-set assessment procedure potentially contributes to the FIMCAR objectives to maintain the compartment strength and to assess load spreading in frontal collisions. Furthermore it provides the opportunity to assess the restraint system performance with different pulses if combined with a full-width assessment procedure in the frontal assessment approach. Originally it was expected that the PDB assessment procedure would be selected for the FIMCAR assessment approach. However, it was not possible to deliver a compatibility metric in time so that the current off-set procedure (ODB as used in UNECE R94) with some minor modifications was proposed for the FIMCAR Assessment Approach. Nevertheless the potential to assess load spreading, which appears not to be possible with any other assessed frontal impact assessment procedure was considered to be still high. Therefore the development work for the PDB assessment procedure did not stop with the decision not to select the PDB procedure. As a result of the decisions to use the current ODB and to further develop the PDB procedure, both are covered within this deliverable. The deliverable describes the off-set test procedure that will be recommended by FIMCAR consortium, this corresponds to the ODB test as it is specified in UN-ECE Regulation 94 (R94), i.e. EEVC deformable element with 40% overlap at a test speed of 56 km/h. In addition to the current R94 requirements, FIMCAR will recommend to introduce some structural requirements which will guarantee sufficiently strong occupant compartments by enforcing the stability of the forward occupant cell. With respect to the PDB assessment procedure a new metric, Digital Derivative in Y direction - DDY, was developed, described, analysed, and compared with other metrics. The DDY metric analyses the deformation gradients laterally across the PDB face. The more even the deformation, the lower the DDY values and the better the metric- result. In order analyse the different metrics, analysis of the existing PDB test results and the results of the performed simulation studies was performed. In addition, an assessment of artificial deformation profiles with the metrics took place. This analysis shows that there are still issues with the DDY metric but it appears that it is possible to solve them with future optimisations. For example the current metric assesses only the area within 60% of the half vehicle width. For vehicles that have the longitudinals further outboard, the metric is not effective. In addition to the metric development, practical issues of the PDB tests such as the definition of a scan procedure for the analysis of the deformation pattern including the validation of the scanning procedure by the analysis of 3 different scans at different locations of the same barrier were addressed. Furthermore the repeatability and reproducibility of the PDB was analysed. The barrier deformation readings seem to be sensitive with respect to the impact accuracy. In total, the deliverable is meant to define the FIMCAR off-set assessment procedure and to be a starting point for further development of the PDB assessment procedure.
Annual report 2011/2012
(2013)
Traffic on German roads is increasing continuously. The research of the Federal Institute for Materials Research (BASt) is concerned with a road system that will be functioning well in the future, that is safe and economically and ecologically sustainable. Every two years, BASt reports on its tasks, research projects and selected administrative topics. The current report comprises the years of 2011 and 2012. On 151 pages, it provides an idea of current research about important topics of roads and traffic. The projects SKRIBT and SKRIBTPlus examined the behaviour of drivers in tunnels in hazardous situations. It was discovered that in situations like this many people often react inadequately and too late. The collected data were used to develop new concepts that improve behaviour in hazardous situations in tunnels. In recent years, new safety systems that improve braking behaviour in hazardous situations have been installed in vehicles. However, for end users it is difficult to compare different systems because they have no access to suitable assessments. The EU project ASSESS (Assessment of Integrated Vehicle Safety Systems for improved vehicle safety) in which BASt is involved as a key partner therefore developed a uniform procedure for assessment and legal questions. Many European countries agree: Alcohol, drugs and medication in road traffic constitute a safety risk on European roads. In order to gain new insights and to develop suitable countermeasures, the European Commission approved of the largest research project to improve road safety to date: DRUID (Driving Under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines). This BASt-coordinated project took five years and involved institutes from 18 European countries. The result is a comprehensive stock taking and concrete suggestions on measures to be taken. A mayor part of the work of BASt also comprises extension and maintenance of the entire road infrastructure. The report "How will we make constructions in the future: Road construction without oil?" for instance examines the question how we will maintain and extend our roads in the future with resources becoming scarcer and more expensive. Furthermore, the campaign "on" the road plays a major part at BASt. For years there has been a shortage of parking spaces for trucks on federal highways. To remedy this situation, BAST has developed a new control approach: The so-called compact parking system increases capacities and uses them more effectively by parking trucks in a line according to their planned departure time.
There is a need to continue to set the right vehicle safety policy priorities in the future. Research has to point out the most cost efficient and safety relevant measures to further reduce the number of road traffic casualties. The overall development shows that the constant and rapid decrease in the number of road casualties slows down. New innovations need to enter the vehicle market soon, in order to continue the success achieved in the last decade. Priorities for vehicle safety are driven by safety and mobility demands. It is necessary to keep a strong lid on all aspects of elderly and vulnerable road users. The fraction of powered-two-wheelers (PTW) is a priority group. PTWs have a risk of being involved in an accident, 14times higher than that of a passenger car. However, the figures do also show that every second fatality is a car occupant. Therefore passenger car safety remains to be top priority. Heavy goods vehicles are overly represented in fatal accidents, addressing the need to make these vehicles more compatible with other road users. These facts highlight the necessity not only to increase vehicles" self protection, but also to make cars - and trucks - more compatible and safe. Cycling is a strongly increasing mode of transport. This is a further reason to demand better protection for cyclists and pedestrians from car design and car active and integrated safety systems. Another priority for future vehicle safety is related to demographics. It is less known that the purely demographic effect will be superimposed by an increasing wish of elderly people to be mobile. However, elderly people show deficits concerning their biomechanics. This emphasizes the need for better and more adaptive restraint systems, but also further technological challenges and demands for active safety systems. However, in order to progress, current technological limitations have to be overcome. Cost benefit considerations, but also consumer acceptance and desires, will drive this process.
Haftung bei kooperativen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsystemen : Forschungsprojekt FE 89.0251/2010
(2012)
Die Untersuchung zum Forschungsprojekt FE 89.0251/2010 "Haftung bei kooperativen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsystemen" beschäftigt sich mit der rechtlichen Analyse verschiedener haftungsrechtlich relevanter Szenarien im Straßenverkehr, bei denen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsysteme bereits eingebunden sind, oder aber eine Einbindung in naher Zukunft zu erwarten ist. Berücksichtigt sind nur Informations- und Warnsysteme. Als relevante Szenarien werden die lokale Gefahrenwarnung und die optimale Verkehrsflusssteuerung für Lichtsignalanlagen identifiziert. Bei der lokalen Gefahrenwarnung ist zu unterschieden, ob sicherheitsrelevante Informationen von den beteiligten Verkehrs- bzw. Fahrerassistenzsystemen nur weitergeleitet oder auch bearbeitet und ausgewertet werden. Die untersuchten Fälle berücksichtigen verschiedene Fehlerquellen und unterscheiden danach, ob die involvierte Infrastruktur von öffentlicher Hand oder von einem privaten Unternehmen betrieben wird. Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojektes sind: a) Haftungsrechtliche Anspruchsgrundlagen ergeben sich aus dem allgemeinen Deliktsrecht (-§ 823 BGB), der Produkt- und Produzentenhaftung (ProdHaftG bzw. -§ 823 BGB), dem Straßenverkehrsrecht (-§-§ 7, 18 StVG), sowie der Amtshaftung (-§ 839 BGB i.V.m. Art. 34 GG). b) Informatorische oder warnende kooperative Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsysteme dienen alleine einer zusätzlichen Unterstützung des Fahrers und können diesen nicht von der Pflicht befreien, die im Verkehr gebotene Sorgfalt zu beachten. c) Die Hersteller von kooperativen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsystemen müssen wie bei jedem anderen Produkt auch die berechtigten Sicherheitserwartungen der Käufer erfüllen. d) Die öffentliche Hand kommt durch das Betreiben der genannten Systeme ihrer Straßenverkehrssicherungspflicht nach. Nur wenn sie diese nicht mit der nötigen Sorgfalt erfüllt, kommt eine Haftung in Betracht. e) Durch die Verwendung von informatorischen oder warnenden kooperativen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsystemen ist keine grundsätzliche Haftungsverschiebung festzustellen. Weitere Empfehlungen: Informatorische oder warnende kooperative Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsysteme können ohne zusätzliches systemspezifisches Haftungsrisiko in den Straßenverkehr eingeführt werden.
Teil 1, Informations- und Kommunikationstechniken zur Optimierung des Betriebsdienst-Managements: In vielen Arbeits- und Organisationsprozessen des Straßenbetriebsdienstes werden Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (IuK-Technologien) eingesetzt, um Arbeitsabläufe einfacher, besser und sicherer zu gestalten sowie umfassende Daten für die Abrechnung und weitere Planung bereit zu stellen. Die Potenziale der IuK-Technologien werden im Straßenbetriebsdienst häufig nur unvollständig genutzt. Ziel des FE-Vorhabens war die systematische Aufbereitung von Anforderungen und Möglichkeiten der IuK-Technologien. Die Anforderungen des Straßenbetriebsdienstes an den Einsatz der IuK-Technologien berücksichtigen neben der derzeitigen Praxis auch künftige Entwicklungen, die sich beispielsweise aus der Einführung der wirtschaftlichkeitsorientierten Steuerung des Betriebsdienstes ergeben. Damit IuK-Technologien erfolgreich betrieben werden können, ist neben Funktionalität und Qualität der technischen Komponenten auch die Berücksichtigung der organisatorischen und betrieblichen Abläufe im Straßenbetriebsdienst von großer Bedeutung. In den Untersuchungen zur mobilen Sprach- und Datenkommunikation wurde deutlich, dass bei Auslaufen des Analogfunks neben dem Aufbau eigenständiger Digitalfunknetze auch die Nutzung des kommerziellen Mobilfunks in Betracht gezogen werden sollte. Wesentliche Grundlagen für die wirtschaftliche Steuerung sind die automatisierte Einsatzdatenerfassung sowie ein umfassendes Bestandsdatenmanagement, wobei Bestandsobjekte auch mit Hilfe von RFID-Chips identifiziert werden können. Im Winterdienst sollten verstärkt berührungslose Sensoren für die Erfassung von Fahrbahntemperatur und "zustand zum Einsatz kommen. Salzmanagementsysteme ermöglichen u.a. die Überwachung von Streustoffvorräten an nicht besetzten Standorten sowie eine übergeordnete Logistik bei Lieferengpässen. Wichtig sind auch Systeme zur Unterstützung der Fahrer von Winterdienstfahrzeugen, durch die Einsätze anforderungsgerechter und flexibler erfolgen können. Es wurden auch innovative IuK-Technologien analysiert, die große Potentiale für den Straßenbetriebsdienst erkennen lassen. Hierzu zählen die mobile Erfassung des Straßenzustandes für den Winterdienst durch Einsatzfahrzeuge oder Fahrzeuge des Individualverkehrs, alternative Kommunikationswege für die Warnung der Verkehrsteilnehmer vor Arbeitsstellen im Verkehrsraum sowie das autonome Fahren von Absperr- und Vorwarnanhängern, durch das die Gefährdung des Personals im Verkehrsraum deutlich reduziert werden kann. Es besteht jedoch noch erheblicher Forschungs- und Entwicklungsbedarf, um diese Technologien effizient im Straßenbetriebsdienst einzusetzen sowie ihren Nutzen umfassend bewerten zu können. Teil 2, Autonomes Fahren für den Straßenbetriebsdienst: Mitarbeiter des Betriebsdienstes sind in Arbeitsstellen auf Autobahnen enormen Unfallgefahren ausgesetzt. Weiterhin erfordert die Sicherung von Arbeitsstellen kürzerer Dauer (AkD) einen hohen personellen und zeitlichen Aufwand. Das FE-Projekt "Informations- und Kommunikationstechniken zur Optimierung des Betriebsdienst-Managements" zeigte, dass die Anwendung autonomer Fahrzeuge im Betriebsdienst die Gefährdung des Personals im Verkehrsraum reduzieren kann. In Ergänzung dazu wurde der Entwicklungsansatz "Autonomes Fahren für den Straßenbetriebsdienst" konkretisiert. Eine untersuchte Minimallösung beinhaltet ein autonom fahrendes Absperrfahrzeug, welches einem Führungsfahrzeug auf der Autobahn folgt. In einem zweiten Gesamtkonzept ist die Automatisierung einer gesamten Absicherungskolonne mit Absperr- und Vorwarnfahrzeugen incl. der unbemannten Anfahrt zur Autobahn auf nicht öffentlichen Straßen vorgesehen. In der technischen Umsetzung handelt es sich bei den Einsatzszenarien der unbemannten Fahrzeuge um Formationsfahrten oder Folgefahrt-Szenarien auf der Autobahn. Unbemannte Fahrzeuge mit den dargestellten Funktionsweisen können deutliche Sicherheitssteigerungen für Betriebsdienstmitarbeiter bieten. Eine erste Abschätzung ergab, dass rund 70 % der Mitarbeiter, welche in AkD auf Autobahnen beim Aufenthalt in Fahrzeugen verunglücken, durch den Einsatz unbemannter Arbeitsstellensicherung geschützt werden können. Dies entspricht rund der Hälfte der insgesamt bei Unfällen in AkD verunglückten Mitarbeiter. Für die Realisierung unbemannter Sicherungsfahrzeuge sind viele technische Fragestellungen zu klären, insbesondere bezüglich der Prognose und Detektion von Fehlfunktionen. Für den Einsatz der vorgeschlagenen Systeme ist eine allgemeine Genehmigung für den täglichen Betrieb notwendig. Hierzu sind zahlreiche rechtliche Fragestellungen zu beantworten. Somit kann die Implementierung unbemannter Sicherungsfahrzeuge im Betriebsdienst als Pilotprojekt für unbemanntes Fahren im Allgemeinen bzw. in anderen Branchen dienen.
Since 2008, the authors inspected fatal traffic accidents on the spot every year, with the cooperation of Toyota police station in Aichi pref. In the jurisdiction, numbers of fatal accidents were 18 in 2008, 12 in 2009, 14 accidents in 2010, and 16 in 2011. We here report the results of our analysis of information obtained by detailed inspection for those that occurred from 2008 to 2010. We focused on vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents, which accounted for about 45% of all accidents in 2008. Because many accidents occurred on residential roads not far from pedestrians" homes, it was revealed that the decrease of the collision speed by traffic calming such as humps and zone speed management, was highly effective. On the other hand, pedestrian detection technologies seemed to be also effective as a countermeasure on vehicle side. Every pedestrian position against a vehicle was clarified and TTC (Time to Collision) was calculated provisionally. Pedestrian accidents in intersections were also examined. Among the intersection pedestrian accidents within the jurisdiction, compared with the national average in Japan, the ratio of intersections without a signal and the ratio without a pedestrian crossing were high. According to the comparison of the Japanese traffic accident patterns between 2001 and 2008, pedestrian accidents during turning right and turning left did not decrease much. For elderly drivers, these accidents occurred very often. Finally, single vehicle accidents were analysed with the accident pattern analysis methods used above. There were high numbers of single vehicle accidents against object on single roads. Although fatal accidents against guardrails decreased, the numbers of fatal accidents against a utility pole and a sign pole were nearly constant. As for the impact with narrow width objects such as utility poles, the fatality rate was very high, and countermeasures of both road infrastructure and vehicles seem to be effective.
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe (EU27) is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car's safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EU-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car's frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation. This paper reports the cost benefit analyses performed to estimate the effect of the following potential changes to the frontal impact regulation: • Option 1 " No change and allow current measures to propagate throughout the vehicle fleet. • Option 2 " Add a full width test to the current offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) test. • Option 3 " Add a full width test and replace the current ODB test with a Progressive Deformable Barrier (PDB) test. For the analyses national data were used from Great Britain (STATS 19) and from Germany (German Federal Statistical Office). In addition in-depth real word crash data were used from CCIS (Great Britain) and GIDAS (Germany). To estimate the benefit a generalised linear model, an injury reduction model and a matched pairs modelling approach were applied. The benefits were estimated to be: for Option 1 "No change" about 2.0%; for Option 2 "FW test" ranging from 5 to 12% and for Option 3 "FW and PDB tests" 9 to 14% of car occupant killed and seriously injured casualties.