Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (18) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Fußgänger (18) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (18) (entfernen)
Europe has benefited from a decreasing number of road traffic fatalities. However, the proportion of older road users increases steadily. In an ageing society, the SENIORS project aims to improve the safe mobility of older road users by determining appropriate requirements towards passive vehicle safety systems. Therefore, the characteristics of road traffic crashes involving the elderly people need to be understood. This paper focuses on car occupants and pedestrians or cyclists in crashes with modern passenger cars. Ten crash databases and four hospital statistics from Europe have been analysed to answer the questions on which body regions are most frequently and severely injured in the elderly, and specific injuries sustained by always comparing older (65 years and above) with midâ€aged road users (25â€64 years). It was found that the body region thorax is of particularly high importance for the older car occupant with injury severities of AIS2 or AIS3+, where as the lower extremities, head and the thorax need to be considered for older pedestrians and cyclists. Further, injury risk functions were provided. The hospital data analysis showed less difference between the age groups. The linkage between crash and hospital data could only be made on a general level as their inclusion criteria were quite different.
Advancing active safety towards the protection of vulnerable road users: the PROSPECT project
(2017)
Accidents involving Vulnerable Road Users (VRU) are still a very significant issue for road safety. According to the World Health Organisation, pedestrian and cyclist deaths account for more than 25% of all road traffic deaths worldwide. Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems have the potential to improve safety for these VRU groups. The PROSPECT project (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) aims to significantly improve the effectiveness of active VRU safety systems compared to those currently on the market by expanding the scope of scenarios addressed by the systems and improving the overall system performance. The project pursues an integrated approach: Newest available accident data combined with naturalistic observations and HMI guidelines represent key inputs for the system specifications, which form the basis for the system development. For system development, two main aspects are considered: advanced sensor processing with situation analysis, and intervention strategies including braking and steering. All these concepts are implemented in several vehicle prototypes. Special emphasis is put on balancing system performance in critical scenarios and avoiding undesired system activations. For system validation, testing in realistic scenarios will be done. Results will allow the performance assessment of the developed concepts and a cost-benefit analysis. The findings within the PROSPECT project will contribute to the generation of state -of-the-art knowledge, technical innovations, assessment methodologies and tools for advancing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems towards the protection of VRUs. The introduction of a new generation safety system in the market will enhance VRU road safety in 2020-2025, contributing to the "Vision Zero" objective of no fatalities or serious injuries in road traffic set out in the Transport White Paper. Furthermore, the test methodologies and tools developed within the project shall be considered for the New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) future roadmaps, supporting the European Commission goal of halving the road toll in the 2011-2020 timeframe.
A reduction of around 48% of all road fatalities was achieved in Europe in the past years including a reduced number of fatalities with an older age. However, among all road fatalities, the proportion of elderly is steadily increasing. In an ageing society, the European (Horizon2020) project SENIORS aims to improve the safe mobility of older road users, who have different transportation habits compared to other age groups. To increase their level of safe mobility by determining appropriate requirements for vehicle safety systems, the characteristics of current road traffic collisions involving the elderly and the injuries that they sustain need to be understood in detail. Hereby, the paper focuses on their traffic participation as pedestrian, cyclist or passenger car occupant. Following a literature review, several national and international crash databases and hospital statistics have been analysed to determine the body regions most frequently and severely injured, specific injuries sustained and types of crashes involved, always comparing older road users (65 years and more) with mid-aged road users (25-64 years). The most important crash scenarios were highlighted. The data sources included European statistics from CARE, data on national level from Germany, Sweden, Italy, United Kingdom and Spain as well as in-depth crash information from GIDAS (Germany), RAIDS (UK), CIREN and NASS-CDS (US). In addition, familiar hospital data from Germany (TraumaRegister DGU-®), Italy (Italian Register of Acute Traumas) and UK hospital statistics (TARN) were included in the study to gain further insight into specific injury patterns. Comprehensive data analyses were performed showing injury patterns of older road users in crashes. When comparing with mid-aged road users, all databases showed that the thorax body region is of particularly high importance for the older car occupant with injury severities of AIS 2 or AIS 3+, whereas the body regions lower extremities, head and thorax need to be considered for the older pedestrians and cyclists. Besides these comparisons, the most frequent and severe top 5 injuries were highlighted per road user group. Further, the most important crash configurations were identified and injury risk functions are provided per age group and road user group. Although several databases have been analysed, the picture on the road safety situation of older road users in Europe was not complete, as only Western European data was available. The linkage between crash data and hospital data could only be made on a general level as their inclusion criteria were quite different.
Supported by field accident data and monitoring results of European Regulation (EC) No. 78/2009, recent plans of the European Commission regarding a way forward to improve passive safety of vulnerable road users include, amongst other things, an extension of the head test area. The inclusion of passive cyclist safety is also being considered by Euro NCAP. Although passenger car to cyclist collisions are often severe and have a significant share within the accident statistics, cyclists are neither considered sufficiently in the legislative nor in the consumer ratings tests. Therefore, a test procedure to assess the protection potential of vehicle fronts in a collision with cyclists has been developed within a current research project. For this purpose, the existing pedestrian head impact test procedures were modified in order to include boundary conditions relevant for cyclists as the second big group of vulnerable road users. Based on an in-depth analysis of passenger car to cyclist accidents in Germany the three most representative accident constellations have been initially defined. The development of the test procedure itself was based on corresponding simulations with representative vehicle and bicycle models. In addition to different cyclist heights, reaching from a 6-year-old child to a 95%-male, also four pedal positions were considered. By reconstruction of a real accident the defined simulation parameters could be validated in advance. The conducted accident kinematics analysis shows for a large portion of the constellations an increased head impact area, which can reach beyond the roof leading edge, as well as high average values for head impact velocity and angle. Based on the simulation data obtained for the different vehicle models, cyclist-specific test parameters for impactor tests have been derived, which have been further examined in the course of head and leg impact tests. In order to study the cyclist accident kinematics under real test conditions, different full scale tests with a Polar-II dummy positioned on a bicycle have been conducted. Overall, the tests showed a good correlation with the simulations and support the defined boundary test conditions. Typical accident scenarios and simulations reveal higher head impact locations, angles and velocities. An extended head impact area with modified test parameters will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users including cyclists. However, due to significantly differing impact kinematics and postures between the lower extremities of pedestrians and cyclists, these injuries cannot be addressed by the means of current test tools such as the flexible pedestrian legform impactor FlexPLI. Based on the findings obtained within the project as well as the existing pedestrian protection requirements a cyclist protection test procedure for use in legislation and consumer test programmes has been developed, whose requirements have been transferred into a corresponding test specification. This specification provides common head test boundary conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, whereby the existing requirements are modified and two parallel test procedures are avoided.
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection based on developments by the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) have been introduced in world-wide regulations and consumer test programmes, with considerable harmonization between these programmes. Nevertheless, latest accident investigations reveal a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads running the risk of not meeting the European Union- goal of halving the number of road fatalities by the year 2020. The branch of external road user safety within the EC-funded research project SENIORS under the HORIZON 2020 framework programme focuses on investigating the benefit of modifications to pedestrian test and assessment procedures and their impactors for vulnerable road users with focus on the elderly. Injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists derived from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) show a trend of AIS 2+ and AIS 3+ injuries getting more relevant for the thorax region in crashes with newer cars (Wisch et al., 2017), while maintaining the relevance for head and lower extremities. Several crash databases from Europe such as GIDAS and the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition (STRADA) also show that head, thorax and lower extremities are the key affected body regions not only for the average population but in particular for the elderly. Therefore, the SENIORS project is focusing on an improvement of currently available impactors and procedures in terms of biofidelity and injury assessment ability towards a better protection of the affected body regions, incorporating previous results from FP 6 project APROSYS and subsequent studies carried out by BASt. The paper describes the overall methodology to develop revised FE impactor models. Matched human body model and impactor simulations against generic test rigs provide transfer functions that will be used for the derivation of impactor criteria from human injury risk functions for the affected body regions. In a later step, the refined impactors will be validated by simulations against actual vehicle front-ends. Prototyping and adaptation of test and assessment procedures as well as an impact assessment will conclude the work of the project at the final stage. The work will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users focusing on the elderly. The use of advanced human body models to develop applicable assessment criteria for the revised impactors is intended to cope with the paucity of actual biomechanical data focusing on elderly pedestrians. In order to achieve optimized results in the future, the improved test methods need to be implemented within an integrated approach, combining active with passive safety measures. In order to address the developments in road accidents and injury patterns of vulnerable road users, established test and assessment procedures need to be continuously verified and, where needed, to be revised. The demographic change as well as changes in the vehicle fleet, leading to a variation of accident scenarios, injury frequencies and injury patterns of vulnerable road users are addressed by the work provided by the SENIORS project, introducing updated impactors for pedestrian test and assessment procedures.
Ältere Menschen als Fußgänger im Straßenverkehr. Eine Wirksamkeitsstudie zum DVR-Sicherheitsprogramm
(1991)
Grundlage für die Untersuchungen waren zwei repräsentative Umfragen bei 973 älteren Verkehrsteilnehmern und bei 680 Verkehrsteilnehmern zwischen 18 und 60 Jahren, offene Interviews mit 50 Moderator(inne)n und Leiterinnen von Senioreneinrichtungen sowie Intensiverhebungen (Befragungen und Verhaltensbeobachtungen) bei insgesamt 720 Seniorinnen und Senioren. Die Erhebungen wurden 1987 durchgeführt. Die Wirksamkeitsstudie umfasst 4 Untersuchungsbereiche: (1) Bekanntheitsgrad und Verbreitung des Programms: Die Untersuchungsergebnisse zeigen eine Bekanntheit des Verkehrssicherheitsprogramms bei einem Fünftel der 18- bis 60jährigen und einem Drittel der Seniorenschaft. Die Seniorenveranstaltungen konnten bis Ende 1987 etwa zehn Prozent aller Senioren erreichen. Das Potential ist damit noch nicht ausgeschöpft. Vielen Senioren waren solche Veranstaltungen noch gar nicht bekannt. Ein Fünftel der repräsentativ befragten Senioren würde, das Angebot vorausgesetzt, "sofort" eine Seniorenveranstaltung besuchen. (2) Bisherige Auswirkungen der Medienaktivitäten: Auswirkungen durch die öffentlichkeitsbezogenen Maßnahmen waren insofern festzustellen, als sich in allen befragten Altersgruppen Personen, die das Programm kennen, über Verhaltensregeln von Fußgängern und über spezielle Belange älterer Fußgänger für deutlich informierter hielten als Nichtkenner des Programms. (3) Erfahrungen bei der Programmumsetzung: Das pädagogisch-didaktische Konzept des DVR-Programms, das im Rahmen eines Moderationsansatzes und in Abgrenzung zu einem Vortragsstil die aktive Auseinandersetzung der Senioren mit ihrer Verkehrsteilnehmerrolle anstrebt, wurde von den Moderatoren ausnahmslos befürwortet. Von den Seniorenkreisleitungen wurde der Nutzen von Verkehrssicherheitsarbeit generell anerkannt. Die aktive Beteiligung der Senioren und die Kontinuität von Verkehrssicherheitsarbeit erschienen hier jedoch nicht überall als ein erstrangiges Anliegen. (4) Wirksamkeitsanalyse: Die Seniorenveranstaltungen führten bei ihren Teilnehmern in erster Linie zu einer Verbesserung des Verkehrswissens, vor allem über das richtige, altersangemessene Überqueren einer Fahrbahn. Dieser Aufklärungserfolg bleibt offensichtlich nicht folgenlos für das Verhalten im Straßenverkehr, denn Teilnehmer an Seniorenveranstaltungen erwiesen sich im Vergleich zu Nichtteilnehmern bei den Verhaltensbeobachtungen als die sicheren Verkehrsteilnehmer. Insgesamt lässt sich ein positives Gesamtergebnis erkennen. Die festgestellten Wirkungen des DVR-Programms können als ein Beitrag zu einer verbesserten Verkehrssicherheit der älteren Fußgänger gewertet werden und sollten daher zu weiteren und verstärkten Anstrengungen in der Programmumsetzung ermutigen.
Die Zielsetzung der Arbeit bestand darin, Erkenntnisse über das "Dunkelfeld" beziehungsweise die "Unfalldunkelziffer" der amtlichen Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik in Deutschland zu gewinnen. Dazu wurde eine Datenerhebung in einem begrenzten Gebiet durchgeführt. Die Untersuchung sollte Hinweise ermöglichen über die Größe der Unfalldunkelziffer in Abhängigkeit von bestimmten Unfallmerkmalen sowie über die Struktur des Dunkelfeldes im Vergleich zur amtlichen Statistik. Als unterer Grenzwert für die Unfalldunkelziffer in der Pilotstudie wird ein Wert von 44 % angesehen. Die Untersuchung zeigt eine deutliche Abhängigkeit der Dunkelziffer von der Unfallschwere. Die Dunkelziffer liegt geringer bei Unfällen mit "ungeschützten" Unfallobjekten (Unfälle mit Fußgängern und Zweiradfahrern). Der Erfassungsgrad für Nachtunfälle ist größer als für Tagunfälle. Die Untersuchungsergebnisse zeigen insgesamt, dass die Struktur der amtlichen Statistik deutlich von der Struktur des Dunkelfeldes abweicht. Es wird die begründete Annahme ausgesprochen, dass die amtliche Verkehrsunfallstatistik unvollständig ist, wobei der Erfassungsgrad nicht einheitlich ist, sondern von verschiedenen Merkmalen (Unfallschwere, Unfallart, etc.) abhängt.
Zwischen der Situation des Fahrradverkehrs in Großbritannien (GB) und der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (D) bestehen große Unterschiede hinsichtlich der Bedeutung des Fahrrades im Verkehrsgeschehen sowie der verkehrlichen und infrastrukturellen Rahmenbedingungen. In beiden Ländern stehen jedoch in dem Bestreben nach einer Förderung des Fahrradverkehrs Fragen der Erhöhung der Verkehrssicherheit im Vordergrund. Aufgabe des Forschungsprojektes war es deshalb, das Unfallgeschehen sowie andere für den Radverkehr sicherheitsrelevante Aspekte in beiden Ländern zu analysieren und vergleichend gegenüberzustellen. Dazu wurden neben einer Auswertung der bereits in beiden Ländern vorliegenden Erkenntnisse in je drei ausgewählten Untersuchungsstädten Unfallanalysen, Verhaltensbeobachtungen und Befragungen von Radfahrern durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse lassen zusammengefasst erkennen, dass Radfahren in GB sowohl hinsichtlich des Unfallrisikos als auch der Unfallschwere nicht sicherer ist als in D. Die Unfallcharakteristik in beiden Ländern unterscheidet sich jedoch in der Zusammensetzung der Unfallbeteiligten, der örtlichen Verteilung der Unfälle im Straßennetz und insbesondere in den typischen Unfallverläufen. Hier wirken sich die Unterschiede in der verkehrlichen Infrastruktur, zum Beispiel bezüglich der Knotenpunktformen und der Ausstattung mit Radverkehrsanlagen sehr deutlich aus. Generell wird deutlich, dass Radverkehrsanlagen bei unzureichender Qualität keine Garantie für eine geringe Unfallgefährdung darstellen. Dies gilt insbesondere für die in D üblichen straßenbegleitenden Radwege. Um die Sicherheit der Radfahrer zu erhöhen, kommt es deshalb weniger auf das "Wieviel?" als auf das "Wie?" der Radverkehrsanlagen an. Speziell in GB besteht noch erheblicher Nachholbedarf im Hinblick auf eine Förderung des Fahrradverkehrs. Auch wenn mit einer Zunahme des Radverkehrs in der Regel auch eine Zunahme der Radverkehrsunfälle verbunden ist, bedeutet dies nicht, dass es zu einem Anstieg der Zahl aller Verkehrsunfälle kommt. Zudem bekräftigt die Untersuchung den Eindruck, dass mit zunehmendem Radverkehr die Gefährdung des einzelnen Radfahrers abnimmt, da die Kraftfahrer dann offenbar eher mit Radfahrern rechnen.
Ein Beitrag zur Beschreibung des Sicherheitsempfindens von Fußgängern auf innerstädtischen Straßen
(1987)
Für Planungsmaßnahmen, die einer umweltorientierten Beurteilung unterzogen werden sollen, nennt der Entwurf zum "Merkblatt für die Berücksichtigung von Umweltkriterien bei der Verkehrsplanung" der Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen elf planungsrelevante Umwelteinflüsse, denen als Primäreinflüsse entscheidende Bedeutung zukommt. Für das im Merkblattentwurf aufgeführte Umweltkriterium "Sicherheitsempfinden" liegen bislang weder eine eindeutige Definition noch anwendungsfähige Quantifizierungsansätze vor. Mit der vorliegenden Arbeit wird der Versuch unternommen, über eine Abgrenzung zu Umweltkriterien ähnlicher Thematik einen Quantifizierungsansatz für das Sicherheitsempfinden abzuleiten und beispielhaft zu erproben. Das Sicherheitsempfinden wird als eine Größe definiert, die mit Hilfe objektiv erfassbarer Kenngrößen von Verkehrswegen, Verkehrsabläufen und weiterer damit verbundener Randbedingungen, das subjektiv von Anwohnern und Nutzern im Rahmen ihrer Verkehrsteilnahme als Fußgänger empfundene Sicherheits- bzw. Unsicherheitsgefühl bei der Benutzung unterschiedlich gestalteter Straßen erklärbar machen soll. Es soll dabei als Umwelteinfluss den Wirkungszusammenhang zwischen den Einflussgrößen - Empfinden von Personen bei der Verkehrsteilnahme als Fußgänger, - Verhaltensmuster von Personen im Verkehr, - Verkehrsverhältnisse sowie - Straßen- und Umfeldcharakteristik herstellen. Die Betrachtung dieser mit Hilfe verschiedener Erhebungsverfahren für einzelne Straßenabschnitte innerstädtischer Bereiche erfassten Einflussgrößen soll es ermöglichen, über die Beurteilung der Verkehrssicherheit auf der Basis von Unfallzahlen hinaus, die subjektiven Sicherheitsansprüche der Anwohner an ihr Wohnumfeld zu berücksichtigen. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchungen zeigen, dass bei einer Betrachtung aller Einflussgrößen des Sicherheitsempfindens eine für diesen Untersuchungsraum interpretierbare Bewertung von der befragten Personengruppe, sowohl für einzelne Straßenabschnitte als auch für zurückgelegte Wege, vorgenommen wurde. In vielen Bereichen sind die Ergebnisse allerdings über ein sehr weites Empfindungsspektrum gestreut und sie bilden keine geeignete Grundlage, um alle Straßen eines Untersuchungsraumes zu bewerten. Hinzu kommt, dass die Aussagen nur für die untersuchten Gebiete Gültigkeit haben und nicht ohne weiteres auf Gebiete ähnlicher Struktur übertragen werden können. Aufgrund dieser Ergebnisse wird es nicht für möglich gehalten, mit Hilfe dieses Quantifizierungsansatzes Quantifizierungsmaßstäbe für das Sicherheitsempfinden zu entwickeln, die allgemein auf innerstädtische Straßen anwendbar sind.
Verkehrsgerechte Lage von Haltestellen im Straßenraum unter dem Aspekt der Verkehrssicherheit
(1989)
Im Rahmen des Forschungsprogramms "Innerstädtische Planung als Einflussgröße auf die Verkehrssicherheit" der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen befasst sich das Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet Öffentliche Verkehrs- und Transportsysteme der Bergischen Universität - Gesamthochschule Wuppertal seit mehreren Jahren mit der verkehrsgerechten Lage und Anlage von Haltestellen des Öffentlichen Personennahverkehrs. In einer Pilotstudie wurden "Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung der Sicherheit an Haltestellen im Straßenraum" untersucht, ohne jedoch empirische Erhebungen durchzuführen. In einem Anschlussauftrag sind die "Auswirkungen busbeeinflusster Lichtsignalanlagen auf die Sicherheit im Haltestellenbereich" geklärt worden. In dem jetzt abgeschlossenen Forschungsvorhaben sind unter dem Aspekt der Verkehrssicherheit die Anforderungen an die Lage und Ausstattung von Haltestellen im Straßenraum, insbesondere von Haltestellen mit erhöhtem Schüleraufkommen, erarbeitet worden. Dies geschah in Bezug auf die vier grundsätzlichen Haltestellenformen: Haltestellen in Mittellage mit Haltestelleninsel; Haltestelleninsel in Mittellage ohne Haltestelleninsel; Haltestellen in Seitenlage mit Haltestellenbucht; Haltestellen in Seitenlage ohne Haltestellenbucht. Untersucht wurden die Verhaltensweisen von Kraftfahrern, Fahrern öffentlicher Verkehrsmittel, Radfahrer, Fahrgäste und Passanten. Es zeigt sich, dass in zahlreichen Verkehrssituationen zwischen den verschiedenen Verkehrsteilnehmern Gefahrenpotentiale vorhanden sind. Verschiedene Problembereiche, wie das Erreichen und Verlassen der Wartefläche, die Erkennbarkeit einer Haltestelle, die An- und Abfahrt öffentlicher Verkehrsmittel an Haltestellen und die Gefährdung von Radfahrern im Bereich von haltenden Bussen, treten an allen Haltestellenformen auf und lassen sich auf gleiche Ursachen zurückführen. Teilweise können die Gefahrenpotentiale durch einfache Maßnahmen wie die Verbesserung der Fahrstreifenführung und der Markierung oder durch technische Sicherungsmaßnahmen (Türsignale an Fahrzeugen oder Lichtsignalanlagen) gemindert oder eleminiert werden. Zur Steigerung der Verkehrssicherheit werden teilweise aber auch bauliche Maßnahmen wie Verbesserung der Sichtverhältnisse, Anlage von Haltestellen-Kaps oder Radwegen, Änderung der Fahrstreifenführung oder der gegenseitigen Zuordnung der Teilhaltestellen vorgeschlagen. Haltestellen mit starkem Schüleraufkommen, auf deren Untersuchung ein Schwerpunkt dieser Forschungsarbeit lag, erfordern außer einer großzügigen Bemessung der Wartefläche, zusätzlichen Sitz- und Ablagegelegenheiten und ungefährlichen oder gesicherten Zuwegen keine besonderen Maßnahmen. Am Ende der Arbeit wird eine Check-Liste vorgestellt, mit deren Hilfe eine Bestandsaufnahme der Merkmale vorhandener und geplanter Haltestellen möglich ist. Damit der Planer in der Praxis eine Hilfe erhält, sollte nun die Herausgabe eines Merkblattes zur verkehrsgerechten Lage und Anlage von Haltestellen vorangetrieben werden, wozu die vorliegende Forschungsarbeit als Vorbereitung dienen kann.
This thesis gives a detailed picture of how planners, politicians, residents and transport engineers in three societies, Britain, Germany and the United States reacted to one of the most powerful inventions of the late nineteenth century, the motor car. Misjudgments of the potential growth of motor vehicle ownership and its adverse effects had serious repercussions in the coming decades, primarily in the dense urban areas. Disturbing has been the underestimation of the importance of public transport as a real alternative to the motor car in urban areas, first by the United States and even several decades later by Britain. Of the three countries, only Germany seems to have struck a better balance. Not surprisingly, already at the beginning of the twentieth century, conflicts occurred between the weaker road participants (pedestrians and cyclists), the existing urban fabric and the motor vehicle. A more comprehensive comparison between Britain and Germany shows that both countries developed specific patterns and had different attitudes towards road transport. Far more has been invested and planned in Germany whereas Britain has shown not so much a lack of foresight in planning but 'in investment in road transport. This major difference has had very visible effects an today's urban structure and transport situation. The demand for restraint of motor traffic had different motives in the two countries, and is not such a new idea as is often assumed. While in Germany even in the 1920s and 30s the protection of historic inheritance was a decisive motive, in Britain that was not the case. Questions of traffic restraint were however raised in connection with road safety and later in the 60s as a means of improving the urban environment. The turning point of nearly unlimited promotion of car use in urban areas took place in Germany during the 60s and 70s, whereas the Buchanan Report had already warned in the early 60s against the adverse effects cars could have in urban areas if they were not controlled. Although even in Britain the report was misunderstood and largely not put into practice, the wave of protest against road building occurred earlier there than in Germany. As a whole, Britain has shown a brillance of ideas in restraining motor vehicles which was lacking in the Federal Republic. At the beginning of the 70s, discussions started seriously in Germany an traffic calming concepts which were slowly transformed into reality, Britain seems to have followed these examples, but with a considerable time lag.
Zur Quantifizierung eines Maßstabes für die Sicherheit von Fußgängerquerungen wurde eine Kombination aus Methoden wie Geschwindigkeitsmessungen, Verkehrsstrombeobachtungen und -mengenerhebungen mit Interaktionsbeobachtungen zwischen Fußgänger und Kraftfahrzeug (Konflikttechnik) an 12 umgestalteten Querungsanlagen im Vorher-Nachher-Vergleich angewandt. Als Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten wurden Aufpflasterungen sowie Einengungen auf eine Fahrspur und Mittelinseln berücksichtigt. Die Darstellung der Ergebnisse bezieht sich auf die Schwere der Konflikte zwischen Fußgänger und Kraftfahrzeug, die Geschwindigkeiten der Fahrzeuge sowie auf die Akzeptanz der Fußgängerüberwege (Nutzungshäufigkeit). In einem Bewertungsansatz wurden die drei Größen zu einem Kennwert zusammengefasst, der das Ausmaß der Gefährdung wiedergibt. Da das Risiko für den Fußgänger, an alternativen Überwegen bei einer Kollision ums Leben zu kommen, um circa 10 Prozent geringer ist als am Zebrastreifen, wird der alternative Überweg als sinnvolle Ergänzung zum Zebrastreifen betrachtet.
Despite the steadily declining number of pedestrian fatalities and injuries in most European countries during recent decades, pedestrian protection is still of great importance in the European Union as well as in Germany. This is because they still constitute a large proportion of road user casualties and are more likely to suffer serious and fatal injuries than most other road users. In 1999 only car occupants suffered more fatal injuries than pedestrians in Germany. In December 1998, EEVC WG 17 completed their review and updating of the EEVC WG 10 pedestrian test procedure that made it possible to evaluate the protection afforded to pedestrians by the front of passenger cars in an accident. Within the scope of this procedure, four different impactors are used representing those parts of the body which are injured very often and/or very seriously in vehicle-pedestrian-collisions. In a project executed by IKA and BASt, a small family car was tested according to the EEVC WG 17 test procedure. Afterwards modifications to the car were carried out in order to improve the pedestrian protection provided by the vehicle design. There were certain restrictions placed on the level of modifications undertaken, e.g. only minor modifications to vehicle styling and to the vehicle structures, which provide passenger protection. The redesigned vehicle was tested again using the WG 17 test procedure. The test results of the modified vehicle were compared with those of the standard vehicle and evaluated. The results show that considered measures for pedestrian protection in many areas of the vehicle front structure and the use of innovative techniques can lead to a significant reduction of the loads of pedestrians at an acceptable expense.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
Proposal for a test procedure of assistance systems regarding preventive pedestrian protection
(2011)
This paper is showing a proposal for a test procedure regarding preventive pedestrian protection based on accident analysis. Over the past years pedestrian protection has become an increasing importance also during the development phase of new vehicles. After a phase of focusing on secondary safety, there are current activities to detect a possible collision by assistance systems. Such systems have the task to inform the driver and/or automatically activate the brakes. How practical is such a system? In which kind of traffic situations will it work? How is it possible to check the effectiveness of such a system? To test the effectiveness, currently there are no generally approved identifiable procedures. It is reasonable that such a test should be based on real accidents. The test procedure should be designed to test all systems, independent of the system- working principle. The vFSS group (advanced Forward-looking Safety Systems) was founded to develop a proposal for a technology independent test procedure, which reflects the real accident situation. This contribution is showing the results of vFSS. The developed test procedure focuses on accidents between passenger cars and pedestrians. The results are based on analysis results of in-depth databases of GIDAS, German insurers and DEKRA and added by analysis of national and international statistics. The in-depth analysis includes many pre-crash situations with several influencing factors. The factors are e. g. speed of the car, speed of the pedestrian, moving direction and a possible obscuration of the pedestrian by an object. The results comprise also the different situations of adults and children. Furthermore, they include details regarding influence of the lighting conditions (daylight or night) especially with respect to the accident consequences. In fact, more accidents happen at daylight, but fatal accidents are more often at night. A clustering of parameter combinations was found which represents typical accident scenarios. There are six typical accident scenarios which were merged in four test scenarios. The test scenarios are varying the starting position of the pedestrian, the pedestrian size (adult or child) and the speed of the pedestrian, whereas the speed of the car will not be varied. To ensure the independency from used sensing technologies it is necessary to use a suitable dummy. For example, if sensors are based on infrared, the dummy should emit the temperature of a human being. The test procedure will identify the collision speed as the key parameter for assessing the effectiveness of the tested system. The collision speed is defined as the reduction between initial test speed of the car and impact speed. The assessment of the speed reduction value regarding the safety benefit, however, will be part of a separate procedure.
Safety of light goods vehicles - findings from the German joint project of BASt, DEKRA, UDV and VDA
(2011)
Light goods vehicles (LGVs) are an important part of the vehicle fleet, providing a vital component in the European transportation system. On the other hand, LGVs are in the focus of public discussion regarding road safety. In order to analyse the accident situation of LGVs in an objective manner, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt), VDA, DEKRA and German Insurers Accident Research (UDV) launched a joint project. The aim of this project, which will be finished by mid of 2011, is to identify reasonable measures which will further improve the safety of LGVs. For the first time, these partners jointly together conducted a research project and put together their know-how in accident research. Analyses are based on real-life accident data from the GIDAS database, the Accident Database of UDV (UDB), the DEKRA database and national statistics. The findings deliver answers to questions within the arena of future legislative actions and consumer protection activities. The analyses of databases cover areas of primary and secondary safety of LGVs with a special focus on advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), driver behaviour as well as partner and occupant protection. Key figures from national statistics are used to highlight hotspots of accidents of LGVs in Germany. Finally, the proposed countermeasures are assessed regarding their potential effectiveness. Amongst others, the results show that the accident situation of LGVs is very similar to that of passenger cars. Noteworthy variations could be found in collisions with pedestrians, at reversing and regarding accident causes. Occupant safety of LGVs is on a higher level compared to cars. Results indicate that seatbelt use is on a significantly lower level compared to cars. This leads to higher-than-average injury risk for unbelted LGV occupants. When it comes to partner protection, there are problems with compatibility at LGVs. For car occupants there is a very high injury risk when colliding with a LGV. It indicates that higher passive safety test standards for LGVs would be counterproductive if they further increase stiffness of LGVs. The analysis of LGV-pedestrian accidents shows that pedestrian kinematic differs significantly from car-pedestrian accidents. At this point, existing pedestrian related test standards developed for cars cannot be adopted to LGVs. When it comes to active safety, ESC proved its effectiveness once again. Beyond that, rear view cameras, advanced emergency braking systems and lane departure warning systems show a safety potential, too. In addition to any technical countermeasures previously discussed, the importance of the driver behavior and attitude regarding the accident risk was investigated. In order to develop successful actions it is important to understand the main target population. In the case of LGV especially the crafts business and smaller companies are the major contributors the safety issue.
It is well known that most accidents with pedestrians are caused by the driver not being alert or misinterpreting the situation. For that reason advanced forward looking safety systems have a high potential to improve safety for this group of vulnerable road users. Active pedestrian protection systems combine reduction of impact speed by driver warning and/or autonomous braking with deployment of protective devices shortly before the imminent impact. According to the Euro NCAP roadmap the Autonomous Emergency Braking system tests for Pedestrians Protection will be set in force from 2016 onwards. Various projects and organisations in Europe are developing performance tests and assessment procedures as accompanying measures to the Euro NCAP initiative. To provide synthesised input to Euro NCAP so-called Harmonisation Platforms (HP-) have been established. Their main goal is to foster exchange of information on key subjects, thereby generating a clear overview of similarities and differences on the approaches chosen and, on that basis, recommend on future test procedures. In this paper activities of the Harmonisation Platform 2 on the development of Test Equipment are presented. For the testing targets that mimic humans different sensing technologies are required. A first set of specifications for pedestrian targets and the propulsion systems as collected by Harmonisation Platform 2 are presented together with a first evaluation for a number of available tools.
A flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) with biofidelic characteristics is aimed to be implemented within global legislation on pedestrian protection. Therefore, it is being evaluated by a technical evaluation group (Flex-TEG) of GRSP with respect to its biofidelity, robustness, durability, usability and protection level (Zander, 2008). Previous studies at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and other laboratories already showed good progress concerning the general development, but also the need for further improvement and further research in various areas. An overview is provided of the different levels of development and all kinds of evaluation activities of the Flex-TEG, starting with the Polar II full scale pedestrian dummy as its origin and ending up with the latest legform impactor built level GTR that is expected to be finalized by the end of the year 2009. Using the latest built levels as a basis, gaps are revealed that should be closed by future developments, like the usage of an upper body mass (UBM), the validation of the femur loads, injury risk functions for the cruciate knee ligaments and an appropriate certification method. A recent study on an additional upper body mass being applied for the first time to the Flex-GT is used as means of validation of recently proposed modified impact conditions. Therefore, two test series on a modern vehicle front using an impactor with and without upper body mass are compared. A test series with the Flex-GTR will be used to study both the comparability of the impact behavior of the GT and GTR built level as well as the consistency of test results. Recommendations for implementation within legislation on pedestrian protection are made.