Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (1354)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (637)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (542)
- Bericht (83)
- Arbeitspapier (53)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (40)
- Sonstiges (25)
Sprache
- Deutsch (2249)
- Englisch (482)
- Mehrsprachig (3)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (1083)
- Germany (1079)
- Forschungsbericht (724)
- Research report (704)
- Safety (514)
- Sicherheit (514)
- Unfall (444)
- Accident (434)
- Bewertung (423)
- Conference (413)
Institut
- Sonstige (1197)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (425)
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (395)
- Abteilung Straßenbautechnik (268)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (267)
- Abteilung Brücken- und Ingenieurbau (230)
- Stabstelle Presse und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (24)
- Präsident (11)
- Zentralabteilung (8)
- Stabstelle Forschungscontrolling, Qualitätsmanagement (2)
The off-set assessment procedure potentially contributes to the FIMCAR objectives to maintain the compartment strength and to assess load spreading in frontal collisions. Furthermore it provides the opportunity to assess the restraint system performance with different pulses if combined with a full-width assessment procedure in the frontal assessment approach. Originally it was expected that the PDB assessment procedure would be selected for the FIMCAR assessment approach. However, it was not possible to deliver a compatibility metric in time so that the current off-set procedure (ODB as used in UNECE R94) with some minor modifications was proposed for the FIMCAR Assessment Approach. Nevertheless the potential to assess load spreading, which appears not to be possible with any other assessed frontal impact assessment procedure was considered to be still high. Therefore the development work for the PDB assessment procedure did not stop with the decision not to select the PDB procedure. As a result of the decisions to use the current ODB and to further develop the PDB procedure, both are covered within this deliverable. The deliverable describes the off-set test procedure that will be recommended by FIMCAR consortium, this corresponds to the ODB test as it is specified in UN-ECE Regulation 94 (R94), i.e. EEVC deformable element with 40% overlap at a test speed of 56 km/h. In addition to the current R94 requirements, FIMCAR will recommend to introduce some structural requirements which will guarantee sufficiently strong occupant compartments by enforcing the stability of the forward occupant cell. With respect to the PDB assessment procedure a new metric, Digital Derivative in Y direction - DDY, was developed, described, analysed, and compared with other metrics. The DDY metric analyses the deformation gradients laterally across the PDB face. The more even the deformation, the lower the DDY values and the better the metric- result. In order analyse the different metrics, analysis of the existing PDB test results and the results of the performed simulation studies was performed. In addition, an assessment of artificial deformation profiles with the metrics took place. This analysis shows that there are still issues with the DDY metric but it appears that it is possible to solve them with future optimisations. For example the current metric assesses only the area within 60% of the half vehicle width. For vehicles that have the longitudinals further outboard, the metric is not effective. In addition to the metric development, practical issues of the PDB tests such as the definition of a scan procedure for the analysis of the deformation pattern including the validation of the scanning procedure by the analysis of 3 different scans at different locations of the same barrier were addressed. Furthermore the repeatability and reproducibility of the PDB was analysed. The barrier deformation readings seem to be sensitive with respect to the impact accuracy. In total, the deliverable is meant to define the FIMCAR off-set assessment procedure and to be a starting point for further development of the PDB assessment procedure.
Die Bewertung von Projekten im Rahmen von Kosten-Nutzen-Analysen erfordert quantitative Input-Informationen zu den Kosten von Verkehrsunfällen. In der deutschen Bewertungspraxis werden bislang ausschließlich die mittel- und unmittelbar anfallenden monetären Folgen von Verkehrsunfällen quantitativ berücksichtigt, während die immateriellen Folgen wie Schmerz, Leid, Verlust an Lebensqualität bzw. die Zahlungsbereitschaft der Bevölkerung zur Verringerung/Vermeidung dieser Folgen unberücksichtigt bleiben. Die hier vorgelegte Vorstudie fasst den heutigen Stand der Forschung zur Quantifizierung von Zahlungsbereitschaften für die Verkehrssicherheit durch eine umfassende und systematische Übersicht der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zusammen. Die fünf Verfahren hedonische Preisbildung, kontingente Bewertungsmethode, Risiko-Risiko-Analyse, Standardlotteriemethode und Stated-Choice (SC) werden hinsichtlich ihrer theoretischen Fundierung, der verwendeten methodischen Ansätze (Art der Befragung, Modellierung etc.) und den Anwendungserfahrungen untersucht. Unter den verfügbaren Verfahren stellen die SC-Methoden den heutigen State-of-the-Art in der Forschung zur Ermittlung der Zahlungsbereitschaft der Bevölkerung für nicht marktfähige Güter dar. Allerdings liegen die meisten Anwendungserfahrungen mit SC-Ansätzen bislang für die Bewertung der Reisezeit und der Zuverlässigkeit vor. Zusammenfassend ist festzustellen, dass im Laufe der letzten Jahre eine Lücke zwischen dem Stand der Forschung (SC-Methoden) und dem Stand der Praxis (andere Methoden) entstanden ist, die mit Anwendungserfahrungen gefüllt werden sollte. Insbesondere für Deutschland liegt ein wesentlicher Forschungsbedarf vor. Basierend auf diesem Überblick werden daher Vorschläge für die weitere Forschung entwickelt.
The BASt-project group "Legal consequences of an increase in vehicle automation" has identified, defined and consequently compiled different automation degrees beyond Driver Assistance Systems. These are partial-, high- and full automation. According to German regulatory law, i.e. the German Road Traffic Code, it has been identified that the distinctive feature of different degrees of automation is the permanent attention of the driver to the task of driving as well as the constant availability of control over the vehicle. Partial automation meets these requirements. The absence of the driver- concentration to the traffic situation and to execute control is in conflict with the use of higher degrees of vehicle automation (i.e. high and full automation). Their use is therefore presently not compatible with German law, as the human driver would violate his obligations stipulated in the Road Traffic Code when fully relying on the degree of automation these systems would offer. As far as higher degrees of automation imply free-hand driving, further research in terms of behavioural psychology is required to determine whether this hinders the driver in the execution of permanent caution as required by sec. 1 para. 1 StVO (German Road Traffic Code). As far as liabilities according to the StVG (German Road Traffic Act) are concerned, the presently reversed burden of proof on the driver within sec. 18 para. 1 S. 2 StVG might no longer be considered adequate in case of higher degrees of automation that allow the driver to draw attention from the task of driving (in case making such use of a system would be permitted by the German Road Traffic Code). The liability of the vehicle "keeper", according to the German Road Traffic Act, would remain applicable to all defined degrees of automation. In case of partial automation, the use of systems according to their limits is accentuated. The range of use that remains within the intended must be defined closely and unmistakeably. Affecting user expectations properly can immensely help to maintain safe use, in case design-measures that exclude overreliance are not available according to the current state of the art (otherwise such measures would have to be applied primarily). In case of the higher degrees of automation that no longer require the driver- permanent attention (under the presupposition their use would be permitted by the German Road Traffic Code), every accident potentially bears the risk to cause product liability on the side of the manufacturer. Liability of the manufacturer might only be excluded in case of a breach of traffic rules by a third party or in case of overriding/ oversteering by the driver. In so far aspects of German procedural law and the burden of proof are of great importance. The project group has identified the need for further continuative research not only to advance legal assessment but also to improve basic technical conditions for vehicle automation as well as product reliability.
Straßenverkehrszählungen (SVZ) mit mobilen Mess-Systemen : Erhebungs- und Hochrechnungsmethodik
(2013)
Für die nächste Straßenverkehrszählung (SVZ) im Jahre 2015 soll für Abschnitte zweistreifiger Bundesstraßen der temporäre Einsatz mobiler Messsysteme nach einem Rotationsprinzip ermöglicht werden. Dazu wurde in einer 1. Stufe ein Erhebungs- und Hochrechnungskonzept entwickelt, um mit möglichst wenigen Geräten die jährliche Verkehrsstärke und spezielle Kennwerte zuverlässig abzuleiten. Die Grundlage der Hochrechnung bilden die zeitgleich (synchron) zu den temporären Zählungen betriebenen Dauerzählstellen in einer Raumeinheit. Anhand dieser Daten wurden die zentralen Fragen wie Dauer, Häufigkeit und Lage der Zählungen innerhalb des Jahres untersucht. Das Einsatzmodell sieht insgesamt drei Wochen vor. Werktags- und Sonntagsverkehr werden mit zwei um einige Monate versetzte Wochenzählungen außerhalb der Ferien erfasst, der Urlaubsverkehr durch eine Wochenzählung innerhalb der Sommerferien. Die Hochrechnungsfaktoren für die einzelnen Zählwochen ergeben sich aus linearen multiplen Regressionsfunktionen. Deren Koeffizienten werden aus den Dauerzählstellen mit den Einflussgrößen Ferienverkehrs-, Sonntags- und Freitagsfaktoren errechnet. Die Kennwerte, insbesondere "Lärmwerte" und Bemessungsverkehrsstärken, können zum Teil direkt aus den Zähldaten bzw. indirekt über Regressiosansätze abgeleitet werden. In einer 2. Stufe wurde anhand von Dauerzählstellen der Jahre 2000 bis 2010 analysiert, wie die einzelnen Jahresergebnisse auf ein einheitliches Basisjahr übertragen werden können. Wegen der größeren Entwicklungsunterschiede sollte dabei zwischen Werktags- und Sonntagsverkehr sowie zwischen Personen- und Güterverkehr unterschieden werden. In einer 3. Stufe wurden Wege aufgezeigt, wie für Zählungen im Rahmen von Sonderuntersuchungen eine schnelle Ergebnisbereitstellung ermöglicht werden kann. Dies ist notwendig, da die endgültigen Ergebnisse der Dauerzählstellen, die Voraussetzung für die Ableitung der Hochrechnungsfaktoren sind, erst am Anfang des Folgejahres vorliegen. Je nach Einsatzzeit können die Ergebnisse aus den Wochenzählungen als Näherungswerte übernommen werden. Für allgemeine Anwendungen wurden Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Software-Lösung gegeben.
Um die zukünftige Entwicklung von Fahrzeugen mit alternativem Antrieb in Deutschland verfolgen, analysieren und mögliche negative Auswirkungen auf die Verkehrssicherheit zeitnah identifizieren zu können, hat die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) im Jahr 2010 die Einrichtung einer langfristigen Beobachtung des Fahrzeugmarktes und des Unfallgeschehens von Pkw mit alternativen Antriebsarten initiiert. Die Daten des vorliegenden Berichtes dokumentieren die Marktdurchdringung von Personenkraftwagen mit alternativen Antriebsarten und informieren über die Unfallbeteiligung von Fahrzeugen mit alternativem Antrieb bis 2011. Es hat sich gezeigt, dass Fahrzeuge mit Hybridantrieb nach wie vor ein starkes Marktwachstum aufweisen. Die Zuwachsrate ist nahezu auf dem gleichen hohen Niveau wie in den Vorjahren (ca. 28%, getypter Bestand). Bei den reinen Elektrofahrzeugen ist die Anzahl getypter Fahrzeuge sehr stark angestiegen, von 212 im Jahr 2010 auf 1880 im Jahr 2011. Der reale Bestand an Elektrofahrzeugen (inklusive ungetypter Fahrzeuge) hat sich demgegenüber von 2010 auf 2011 auf 4.541 Pkw verdoppelt. Dies deutet auf eine zunehmende Serienreife von Elektro-Kfz hin. Pkw mit alternativem Antrieb weisen 2011 (bis auf Gas) einen höheren Anteil an Unfällen innerorts auf als Pkw mit herkömmlichem Antrieb. Hybrid Fahrzeuge haben dabei eine erhöhte Beteiligungsquote innerorts von ca. 76%. Der relativ hohe Anteil von Innerortsunfällen von alternativ betriebenen Fahrzeugen ist vor allem vor dem Hintergrund der Nutzung der Fahrzeuge zu interpretieren.
Since its beginning in 1999, the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) evolved into the presumably leading representative road traffic accident investigation in Europe, based on the work started in Hanover in 1973. The detailed and comprehensive description of traffic accidents forms an essential basis for vehicle safety research. Due to the ongoing extension of demands of researchers, there is a continuous progress in the techniques and systematic of accident investigation within GIDAS. This paper presents some of the most important developments over the last years. Primary vehicle safety systems are expected to have a significant and increasing influence on reducing accidents. GIDAS therefore began to include and collect active safety parameters as new variables from the year 2005 onwards. This will facilitate to assess the impact of present and future active safety measures. A new system to analyse causation factors of traffic accidents, called ACASS, was implemented in GIDAS in the year 2008. The whole process of data handling was optimised. Since 2005 the on-scene data acquisition is completely conducted with mobile tablet PCs. Comprehensive plausibility checks assure a high data quality. Multi-language codebooks are automatically generated from the database structure itself and interfaces ensure the connection to various database management systems. Members of the consortium can download database and codebook, and synchronize half a terabyte of photographic documentation through a secured online access. With the introduction of the AIS 2005 in the year 2006, some medical categorizations have been revised. To ensure the correct assignment of AIS codes to specific injuries an application based on a diagnostic dictionary was developed. Furthermore a coding tool for the AO classification was introduced. All these enhancements enable GIDAS to be up to date for future research questions.
A flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) with biofidelic characteristics is aimed to be implemented within global legislation on pedestrian protection. Therefore, it is being evaluated by a technical evaluation group (Flex-TEG) of GRSP with respect to its biofidelity, robustness, durability, usability and protection level (Zander, 2008). Previous studies at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and other laboratories already showed good progress concerning the general development, but also the need for further improvement and further research in various areas. An overview is provided of the different levels of development and all kinds of evaluation activities of the Flex-TEG, starting with the Polar II full scale pedestrian dummy as its origin and ending up with the latest legform impactor built level GTR that is expected to be finalized by the end of the year 2009. Using the latest built levels as a basis, gaps are revealed that should be closed by future developments, like the usage of an upper body mass (UBM), the validation of the femur loads, injury risk functions for the cruciate knee ligaments and an appropriate certification method. A recent study on an additional upper body mass being applied for the first time to the Flex-GT is used as means of validation of recently proposed modified impact conditions. Therefore, two test series on a modern vehicle front using an impactor with and without upper body mass are compared. A test series with the Flex-GTR will be used to study both the comparability of the impact behavior of the GT and GTR built level as well as the consistency of test results. Recommendations for implementation within legislation on pedestrian protection are made.
According to the German road traffic regulations children up to the age of 12 or a height below 150 cm have to use approved and appropriate child restraint systems (CRS). CRS must be approved according to UN-ECE Regulation No. 44. The regulation classifies CRS in 5 weight categories. The upper weight group is approved for children from 22 to 36 kg. However, studies show that already today many children weigh more than 36 kg although they have not reached a height of 150 cm. Therefore, no ECE R44 approved CRS is available for these overweight children. In conclusion, today's sizes and weights of children are no longer represented by the current version of the ECE R44. The heaviest used dummy (P10) weighs just 32.6 kg and has a height of 137.9 cm. Statistical data of German children show that already 5% of the children at a height of 137.9 cm have a weight above 45.3 kg. Regarding children at a height of 145 cm, the 95th percentile limit is at a weight of 53.3 kg. Based on these data 4 dummies with different heights and weights were defined and produced. Two of them are overweight. Up to now, there is no experience how current child restraint systems perform in a car crash if they are used by children with a weight above 36 kg and a height smaller than 150 cm. In the future, different child restraint systems will be tested with respect to the ECE R44 regulation using these overweight dummies.
The head impact of pedestrians in the windscreen area shows a high relevance in real-world accidents. Nevertheless, there are neither biomechanical limits nor elaborated testing procedures available. Furthermore, the development of deployable protection systems like pop-up bonnets or external airbags has made faster progress than the corresponding testing methods. New requirements which are currently not considered are taken into account within a research project of BASt and the EC funded APROSYS (Advanced PROtection SYStems) integrated project relating to passive pedestrian protection. Testing procedures for head impact in the windscreen area should address these new boundary conditions. The presented modular procedure combines the advantages of virtual testing, including full-scale multi-body and finite element simulations, as well as hardware testing containing impactor tests based on the existing procedures of EEVC WG 17. To meet the efforts of harmonization in legislation, it refers to the Global Technical Regulation of UNECE (GTR No. 9). The basis for this combined hardware and virtual testing procedure is a robust categorization covering all passenger cars and light commercial vehicles and defining the testing zone including the related kinematics. The virtual testing part supports also the choice of the impact points for the hardware test and determines head impact timing for testing deployable systems. The assessment of the neck rotation angle and sharp edge contact in the rear gap of pop-up bonnets is included. For the demonstration of this procedure, a hardware sedan shaped vehicle was modified by integrating an airbag system. In addition, tests with the Honda Polar-II Dummy were performed for an evaluation of the new testing procedure. Comparing these results, it was concluded that a combination of simulation and updated subsystem tests forms an important step towards enhanced future pedestrian safety systems considering the windscreen area and the deployable systems.
Evaluation of the performance of competitive headforms as test tools for interior headform testing
(2009)
The European Research Project APROSYS has evaluated the interior headform test procedure developed by EEVC WG 13, representing the head contact in the car during a lateral impact. One important aspect within this test procedure was the selection of an appropriate impactor. The WG13 procedure currently uses the Free Motion Headform as used within the FMVSS 201. The ACEA 3.5 kg headform used in Phase 1 of the European Directive and the future European Regulation on Pedestrian Protection is still discussed as a possible alternative. This paper reports work performed by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) as a part of the APROSYS Task 1.1.3. The study compares the two headform impactors according to FMVSS and ACEA, in a series of basic tests in order to evaluate their sensitivity towards different impact angles, impact accuracy, the effect of differences to impactors of the same type and the effects of the repeatability and reproducibility of the test results. The test surface consisted of a steel tube covered with PU foam and PVC, representing the car interior to be tested. Despite of the higher mass of the FMH the HIC values of this impactor were generally lower than those of the ACEA headform. The FMH showed a higher repeatability of test results but a high sensitivity on the angle of roll, the spherical ACEA impactor performed better with regards to the reproducibility. In case of the ACEA impactor-, the angle of roll had no influence.