Annual Report 2024 with the following key topics: Predictive infrastructure management, Sustainable construction, Sustainable use of energy, Environmentally friendly transport, Active mobility, Proactive road safety, Automated and connected driving, Digital transport, Securing the supply of skilled labour

Today, both in-vehicle human drivers and automated driving systems (ADS) can be in charge of driving the vehicle. In addition, in the near future, it will be possible to drive a vehicle equipped with Level 4 or Level 5 ADS from a remote position, or to provide information to such a vehicle from a remote position. This new form of vehicle motion control is known as teleoperation. In 2021, Germany has introduced the possibility to provide information to a Level 4 or Level 5 ADS-equipped vehicle: According to the German Road Traffic Act (StVG), this so-called remote assistance is performed by the technical supervisor within the meaning of §1d (3) StVG. At the time of writing this report, the direct influence on the execution of vehicle motion control, i.e. remote driving, is not legally regulated yet, and has only been possible in the context of individually authorised test drives in public road traffic. Remote driving covers a wide range of potentially possible future use cases: Examples are the distribution of car-sharing vehicles in public place via remote driving, or transporting goods via remote driving as "hub-to-hub" transport, and much more. It is also conceivable that remote driving adds value to Level 4 or Level 5 ADS-equipped vehicles when they are provided with remote driving to drive through complex trip sections that the ADS cannot handle yet. This technical report formulates open research questions relevant to remote assistance and remote driving. For a socially accepted, safe introduction of this new form of vehicle motion control, the functionally reliable design of the vehicle technology is essential. Furthermore, it is crucial that the respective task that is to be performed remotely, can be well performed by a person from a distance, and that this person has appropriate skills and fitness to drive for the tasks to be performed. The connection via communication technology between the vehicle and the workstation is a constitutive component of teleoperation, and as such, is also focus of this report. This results in five focus areas into which this report is divided.

Annual report with the following key topics: Predictive infrastructure management, Sustainable construction, Sustainable use of energy, Environmentally friendly transport, Active mobility, Proactive road safety, Automated and connected driving, Digital transport and Securing the supply of skilled labour.

This project report describes an investigation into the influence powered trailers may have on the driving dynamics of vehicle combinations compared with non-powered trailers.

The focus of the Annual Report 2020 is on selected research results from all fields of activity of the BASt. Among the topics are for example the re-evaluation of the alcohol ban for novice drivers, the effectiveness of emergency braking systems for trucks or risk factors in motorbike traffic. ‘Talking’ workplaces will be discussed as well as the communication of automated vehicles with non-automated road users and airbag safety systems for cyclists. The traffic barometer shows how traffic developed during the Corona pandemic. Also presented are technical developments to avoid road closures, the RITUN guide for resilient road tunnels, concrete roadway 4.0, how occupational safety demands and promotes innovation, and cross-national research cooperation in road construction. Results on safe rural roads through suitable protective devices, on the use of digital technologies in engineering structures, on sustainable innovative replacement of concrete bridges as well as BASt activities in the BMVI Network of Experts are also presented. Highlights as well as facts and figures complete the report.

Eine Expertengruppe der OECD über "Großversuche für den Straßenoberbau" (Pilotland: Schweiz) hat gemeinsame Versuche zur Messung von Dehnungen in bituminös gebundenen Schichten organisiert. Die Versuche fanden im April 1984 auf der Versuchspiste von Nardo (Italien) statt, mit der Teilnahme von 10 Ländern. Alle Teilnehmer haben auf einem speziell gebauten Versuchsoberbau mit Belastung durch Lastwagen ihre eigenen messtechnischen Verfahren und ihre Geräte gebraucht. Die verwendeten Messfühler werden beschrieben und verschiedene Versuchsparameter analysiert (Eigenschaften des Oberbaus, der Belastungsfahrzeuge, Temperaturen, usw.). Beim Vergleich der Ergebnisse wurden auch analytische Methoden angewendet, um aufgrund von Feld- und Laborergebnissen die wahren Dehnungswerte zu schätzen. In Anbetracht der Streuung verschiedener Parameter können die verwendeten Methoden als zuverlässig beurteilt werden. Auf dieser Grundlage kann sich eine weitere internationale Zusammenarbeit entwickeln.

Technische Sicherheitsverbesserungen führen im Mensch-Maschine-System Straßenverkehr nicht zwangsläufig zu Sicherheitsgewinnen. Von den Einstellungen und Verhaltensgewohnheiten der Fahrzeugführer hängt es ab, ob vergrößerte sicherheitspotenziale adäquat genutzt oder durch Verhaltensanpassungen wieder verspielt werden. Anhand ausgewählter theoretischer Modelle und empirischer Forschungsergebnisse (OECD-Studie Behavioural adaptations to changes in the road transport system) wird dies diskutiert, und es werden Kriterien zur Vermeidung unerwünschter Adaptationen abgeleitet, die bereits bei der Planung und Realisierung technischer Verbesserungen Berücksichtigung finden sollten.

Structured road markings are becoming popular as edge line on high speed roads, ensuring night time visibility (retroreflection) during rain. These markings are often also "audio-tactile": vehicles (un)intentionally driving over it may produce much more tyre/road sound, which may be observed in the vehicle but also in the vicinity. The sound increase inside the car can be considered as a positive side effect, as it alarms the driver and may be very helpful for the prevention of "doze off" traffic accidents. The sound increase perceived outside the car however, may have a positive aspect as it can warn people on the emergency lane about the approaching vehicle, but it may as well annoy people living around. A method for the assessment of the acoustic properties of audio-tactile markings has been developed. It is mainly based on the "Close Proximity" (CPX) method, an ISO method intended for the acoustic assessment of pavements. The results of measurement campaigns with CPX trailers in Belgium and Germany according to a specially designed procedure are presented. The feasibility of the method is discussed. The research has been carried out in the frame of the standardization activities of the CEN working group CEN/TC226/WG2 "Horizontal signalization".

AEB Systems are becoming important to increase traffic safety. Test procedures in testing for consumer information, manufacturer self-certification and technical regulations are used to ensure a certain minimum performance of these systems. Consequently, test robustness, test efficiency and finally test cost become increasingly important. The key driver for testing effort and test costs is the required repeatable accuracy in a test design - the higher the accuracy, the higher effort and test costs. On the other hand, the performance of active safety systems depends on time discretization in the environment perception and other sub-systems: for instance, typical sensors supply information with a cycle time of 50 - 150 ms. Time discretization results in an inherent spread of system performance, even if the test conditions are perfectly equal. The proposed paper shows a methodology to derive requirements for a test setup (e.g. test repeats, use of driving robots, ...) as function of AEB system generation and rating method (e.g. Euro NCAP points awarded, pass/fail, ...). While the methodology itself is applicable to AEB pedestrian and AEB Car-Car scenarios, due to the lack of sufficient test data for AEB Car-Car, the focus of this paper is on AEB pedestrian scenarios. A simulation model for the performance of AEB Pedestrian systems allows for the systematic variation of the discretization time as well as test condition accuracy. This model is calibrated with test results of 4 production vehicles for AEB Pedestrian, all fully tested by BASt according to current Euro NCAP test protocols. Selected parameters to observe the accuracy of the test setup in case of pedestrian AEB is the calculated impact position of pedestrian on the vehicle front (as if no braking would have occurred), and the test vehicle speed accuracy. These variable was shown in real tests to be repeatable in the range of ± 5 cm and ± 0,25 km/h, respectively, with a fully robotized state of the art test setup. The sensitivity of AEB performance (measured in achieved speed reduction as well as overall rating result according to current Euro NCAP rating methods) towards discretization and the sensitivity of performance towards test accuracy then is compared to identify economic yet robust test concepts. These comparisons show that the available repeatability accuracy of current test setups is more than sufficient for today's AEB system capabilities. Time discretization problems dominate the performance spread especially in test scenarios with a limited pedestrian dummy reveal time (e.g. child behind obstruction, running adult scenarios with low car speeds). This would allow to increase test tolerances to decrease test cost. A methodology which allows to derive the required tolerances in active safety tests might be valuable especially for NCAPs of emerging countries that do not have the necessary equipment (e.g. driving robots, positioning units) available for the full-scale and high tolerance EuroNCAP active safety procedures yet still want to rate active safety systems, thus improving the global safety.

Euro NCAP will start to test pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEB) from 2016 on. Test procedures for these tests had been developed by and discussed between the AsPeCSS project and other initiatives (e.g. the AEB group with Thatcham Research from the UK). This paper gives an overview on the development process from the AsPeCSS side, summarizes the current test and assessment procedures as of March 2015 and shows test and assessment results of five cars that had been tested by BASt for AsPeCSS and the respective manufacturer. The test and assessment methodology seems appropriate to rate the performance of different vehicles. The best test result - still one year ahead of the test implementation - is around 80%, while the worst rating result is around 10%. Other vehicles are between these boundaries.

Since the beginning of the testing activities related to passive pedestrian safety, the width of the test area being assessed regarding its protection level for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users has been determined by geometrical measurements at the outer contour of the vehicle. During the past years, the trend of a decreased width of the lower extremity test and assessment area realized by special features of the outer vehicle frontend design could be observed. This study discusses different possibilities for counteracting this development and thus finding a robust definition for this area including all structures with high injury risk for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users in the event of a collision with a motor vehicle. While Euro NCAP is addressing the described problem by defining a test area under consideration of the stiff structures underneath the bumper fascia, a detailed study was carried out on behalf of the European Commission, aiming at a robust, worldwide harmonized definition of the bumper test area for legislation, taking into account the specific requirements of different certification procedures of the contracting parties of the UN/ECE agreements from 1958 and 1998. This paper details the work undertaken by BASt, also serving as a contribution to the TF-BTA of the UN/ECE GRSP, towards a harmonized test area in order to better protect the lower extremities of vulnerable road users. The German In-Depth Accident Database GIDAS is studied with respect to the potential benefit of a revised test area. Several practical options are discussed and applied to actual vehicles, investigating the differences and possible effects. Tests are carried out and the results studied in detail. Finally, a proposal for a feasible definition is given and a suggestion is made for solving possible open issues at angled surfaces due to rotation of the impactor. The study shows that, in principle, there is a need for the entire vehicle width being assessed with regard to the protection potential for lower extremities of vulnerable road users. It gives evidence on the necessity for a robust definition of the lower extremity test area including stiff and thus injurious structures at the vehicle frontend, especially underneath the bumper fascia. The legal definition of the lower extremity test area will shortly be almost harmonized with the robust Euro NCAP requirements, as already endorsed by GRSP, taking into account injurious structures and thus contributing to the enhanced protection of vulnerable road users. After finalization of the development of a torso mass for the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) it is recommended to consider again the additional benefit of assessing the entire vehicle width.

This study aimed to better understand nitrate transport in the soil system in a part of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, in Germany, and to aid in the development of groundwater protection plans. An advection-diffusion (AD) cell was used in a miscible displacement experiment setup to characterize nitrate transport in 12 different soil samples from the study area. The three nitrate sorption isotherms were tested to define the exact nitrate interaction with the soil matrix. Soils varied in their properties which in its turn explain the variations in nitrate transport rates. Soil texture and organic matter content showed to have the most important effect on nitrate recovery and retardation. The miscible displacement experiment indicated a decrease in retardation by increasing sand fraction, and an increase in retardation by increasing soil organic matter content. Soil samples with high sand fractions (up to 94 %) exhibited low nitrate sorption capacity of less than 10 %, while soils with high organic matter content showed higher sorption of about 30 %. Based on parameterization for nitrate transport equation, the pore water velocity for both sandy and loamy soils were significantly different (P < 0.001). Pore water velocity in sandy soil (about 4 x 10 high 3 m/s) was about 100 to 1000 larger than in loamy soils (8.7 x 10 high 5 m/s). On the other hand, the reduction in nitrate transport in soils associated with high organic matter was due to fine pore pathways clogged by fine organic colloids. It is expected that the existing micro-phobicity increased the nitrate recovery from 9 to 32 % resulting in maximum diffusion rates of about 3.5 x 10 high 5 m/s2 in sandy soils (sample number CS-04) and about 1.4 x 10 high 7 m/s2 in silt loam soils (sample number FS-02).