Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (36) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- injury) (36) (entfernen)
Institut
In line with the new definition introduced by the European Commission (EC), the number of seriously injured road casualties in Germany for 2014 is assessed in this study. The number of MAIS3+ casualties is estimated by two different methodological approaches. The first approach is based on data from the German Inâ€Depth Accident Study (GIDAS), which is closely related to the German Road Traffic Accident Statistics. The second approach is based on data from the German TraumaRegister DGU-® (TRâ€DGU), which includes many more hospitals but not all MAIS3+ injuries.
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection based on developments by the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) have been introduced in world-wide regulations and consumer test programmes, with considerable harmonization between these programmes. Nevertheless, latest accident investigations reveal a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads running the risk of not meeting the European Union- goal of halving the number of road fatalities by the year 2020. The branch of external road user safety within the EC-funded research project SENIORS under the HORIZON 2020 framework programme focuses on investigating the benefit of modifications to pedestrian test and assessment procedures and their impactors for vulnerable road users with focus on the elderly. Injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists derived from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) show a trend of AIS 2+ and AIS 3+ injuries getting more relevant for the thorax region in crashes with newer cars (Wisch et al., 2017), while maintaining the relevance for head and lower extremities. Several crash databases from Europe such as GIDAS and the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition (STRADA) also show that head, thorax and lower extremities are the key affected body regions not only for the average population but in particular for the elderly. Therefore, the SENIORS project is focusing on an improvement of currently available impactors and procedures in terms of biofidelity and injury assessment ability towards a better protection of the affected body regions, incorporating previous results from FP 6 project APROSYS and subsequent studies carried out by BASt. The paper describes the overall methodology to develop revised FE impactor models. Matched human body model and impactor simulations against generic test rigs provide transfer functions that will be used for the derivation of impactor criteria from human injury risk functions for the affected body regions. In a later step, the refined impactors will be validated by simulations against actual vehicle front-ends. Prototyping and adaptation of test and assessment procedures as well as an impact assessment will conclude the work of the project at the final stage. The work will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users focusing on the elderly. The use of advanced human body models to develop applicable assessment criteria for the revised impactors is intended to cope with the paucity of actual biomechanical data focusing on elderly pedestrians. In order to achieve optimized results in the future, the improved test methods need to be implemented within an integrated approach, combining active with passive safety measures. In order to address the developments in road accidents and injury patterns of vulnerable road users, established test and assessment procedures need to be continuously verified and, where needed, to be revised. The demographic change as well as changes in the vehicle fleet, leading to a variation of accident scenarios, injury frequencies and injury patterns of vulnerable road users are addressed by the work provided by the SENIORS project, introducing updated impactors for pedestrian test and assessment procedures.
In 2011 399 cyclists died in road accidents in Germany and another 76.351 cyclists have been injured. Since 2000 the number of injured or fatally injured cyclists remained on the same high level. Cyclists form 19% of all casualties in German road traffic, although the modal split rate of this transport mode in 2008 was only 10% of trips and resp. 3% of kilometres per day. The high proportion of fatally and seriously injured shows the high vulnerability of cyclists. The demographic shift towards an older population in Germany and the governmental recommendation of increased bicycle use as an ecological, economical and healthy alternative to other modes of transport lead to the assumption that bicycle use especially of elderly people will increase. Based on these facts about the German cyclists' situation a representative survey of 2.000 cyclists was conducted. Results display use patterns and accident involvement on a descriptive level. Overall 7.7% of cyclists report to have been involved in at least one road traffic accident within the last three years. The performed path model analysis reveals an acceptable model fit. Though the explained variance of accident involvement of the applied psychological factors was low, significant relations between several of these factors and especially risky behaviour could be found.
Unfallgeschehen zwischen rechtsabbiegenden Güterkraftfahrzeugen und geradeausfahrenden Radfahrern
(2014)
Abbiege-Unfälle von Fahrzeugen, bei denen Radfahrer zu Schaden kommen, gehören zu den schweren Radfahrunfällen, insbesondere, wenn sie sich in einer "Tote Winkel"-Situation mit einem Güterkraftfahrzeug ereignen. Unklar ist die genaue Anzahl der Unfälle und die Unfallschwere, welche mit dieser Unfallkonstellation in Zusammenhang stehen können. In der Unfall-Analyse wurden dazu Daten der amtlichen Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik der Jahre 2008 bis 2012 untersucht. Festgestellt wurde, dass diese Unfälle lediglich 1 % aller Radfahrunfälle sowie rund 6 % der insgesamt 406 getöteten Radfahrer darstellen. Durch eine weitere Differenzierung von "Tote Winkel"-Unfällen nach dem zulässigen Gesamtgewicht der Güterkraftfahrzeuge konnte festgestellt werden, dass die schweren Unfälle überwiegend geprägt sind von schweren Güterkraftfahrzeugen mit zulässigem Gesamtgewicht über 7,5 t sowie Sattelschleppern. Theoretisch wird bei jedem 10. "Tote Winkel"-Unfall zwischen einem rechtsabbiegenden, schwerem Güterkraftfahrzeug und einem geradeausfahrenden Radfahrer ungefähr ein Radfahrer getötet. Im laufenden Forschungsvorhaben "Toter Winkel " Konflikt zwischen rechtsabbiegenden Lkw und geradeausfahrendem Radverkehr" sollen die Verkehrssicherheitsdefizite analysiert werden. Des Weiteren wurde ein Forschungsvorhaben "Entwicklung eines Testverfahrens für Nutzfahrzeug-Abbiegeassistenzsysteme" initiiert, um eine Testkonfiguration für die Detektion von Radfahrern und die Warnung des Fahrzeugführers auf Basis von Unfallszenarien abzuleiten.
To improve vehicle safety in frontal collisions, the crash compatibility between the colliding vehicles is crucial. Compatibility aims to improve both the self and partner protection properties of vehicles. Although compatibility has received worldwide attention for many years, no final assessment approach has been defined. Within the Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research (FIMCAR) project, different frontal impact test procedures (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test as currently used for Economic Commission for Europe [ECE] R94, progressive deformable barrier test as proposed by France for a new ECE regulation, moveable deformable barrier test as discussed worldwide, full-width rigid barrier test as used in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard [FMVSS] 208, and full-width deformable barrier test) were analyzed regarding their potential for future frontal impact legislation. The research activities focused on car-to-car frontal impact accidents based on accident investigations involving newer cars. Test procedures were developed with both a crash test program and numerical simulations. The proposal from FIMCAR is to use a full-width test procedure with a deformable element and compatibility metrics in combination with the current offset test as a frontal impact assessment approach that also addresses compatibility. By adding a full-width test to the current ODB test it is possible to better address the issues of structural misalignment and injuries resulting from high acceleration accidents as observed in the current fleet. The estimated benefit ranges from a 5 to 12 percent reduction of fatalities and serious injuries resulting from frontal impact accidents. By using a deformable element in the full-width test, the test conditions are more representative of real-world situations with respect to acceleration pulse, restraint system triggering time, and deformation pattern of the front structure. The test results are therefore expected to better represent real-world performance of the tested car. Furthermore, the assessment of the structural alignment is more robust than in the rigid wall test.
The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Informal Group on GTR No. 7 Phase 2 are working to define a build level for the BioRID II rear impact (whiplash) crash test dummy that ensures repeatable and reproducible performance in a test procedure that has been proposed for future legislation. This includes the specification of dummy hardware, as well as the development of comprehensive certification procedures for the dummy. This study evaluated whether the dummy build level and certification procedures deliver the desired level of repeatability and reproducibility. A custom-designed laboratory seat was made using the seat base, back, and head restraint from a production car seat to ensure a representative interface with the dummy. The seat back was reinforced for use in multiple tests and the recliner mechanism was replaced by an external spring-damper mechanism. A total of 65 tests were performed with 6 BioRID IIg dummies using the draft GTR No.7 sled pulse and seating procedure. All dummies were subject to the build, maintenance, and certification procedures defined by the Informal Group. The test condition was highly repeatable, with a very repeatable pulse, a well-controlled seat back response, and minimal observed degradation of seat foams. The results showed qualitatively reasonable repeatability and reproducibility for the upper torso and head accelerations, as well as for T1 Fx and upper neck Fx. However, reproducibility was not acceptable for T1 and upper neck Fz or for T1 and upper neck My. The Informal Group has not selected injury or seat assessment criteria for use with BioRID II, so it is not known whether these channels would be used in the regulation. However, the ramping-up behavior of the dummy showed poor reproducibility, which would be expected to affect the reproducibility of dummy measurements in general. Pelvis and spine characteristics were found to significantly influence the dummy measurements for which poor reproducibility was observed. It was also observed that the primary neck response in these tests was flexion, not extension. This correlates well with recent findings from Japan and the United States showing a correlation between neck flexion and injury in accident replication simulations and postmortem human subjects (PMHS) studies, respectively. The present certification tests may not adequately control front cervical spine bumper characteristics, which are important for neck flexion response. The certification sled test also does not include the pelvis and so cannot be used to control pelvis response and does not substantially load the lumbar bumpers and so does not control these parts of the dummy. The stiffness of all spine bumpers and of the pelvis flesh should be much more tightly controlled. It is recommended that a method for certifying the front cervical bumpers should be developed. Recommendations are also made for tighter tolerance on the input parameters for the existing certification tests.
In general the passive safety capability is much greater in newer versus older cars due to the stiff compartment preventing intrusion in severe collisions. However, the stiffer structure which increases the deceleration can lead to a change in injury patterns. In order to analyse possible injury mechanisms for thoracic and lumbar spine injuries, data from the German Inâ€Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) were used in this study. A twoâ€step approach of statistical and caseâ€byâ€case analysis was applied for this investigation. In total 4,289 collisions were selected involving 8,844 vehicles, 5,765 injured persons and 9,468 coded injuries. Thoracic and lumbar spine injuries such as burst, compression or dislocation fractures as well as soft tissue injuries were found to occur in frontal impacts even without intrusion to the passenger compartment. If a MAIS 2+ injury occurred, in 15% of the cases a thoracic and/or lumbar spine injury is included. Considering AIS 2+ thoracic and lumbar spine, most injuries were fractures and occurred in the lumbar spine area. From the case by case analyses it can be concluded that lumbar spine fractures occur in accidents without the engagement of longitudinals, lateral loading to the occupant and/or very severe accidents with MAIS being much higher than the spine AIS.
Die Zielsetzung der Arbeit bestand darin, Erkenntnisse über das "Dunkelfeld" beziehungsweise die "Unfalldunkelziffer" der amtlichen Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik in Deutschland zu gewinnen. Dazu wurde eine Datenerhebung in einem begrenzten Gebiet durchgeführt. Die Untersuchung sollte Hinweise ermöglichen über die Größe der Unfalldunkelziffer in Abhängigkeit von bestimmten Unfallmerkmalen sowie über die Struktur des Dunkelfeldes im Vergleich zur amtlichen Statistik. Als unterer Grenzwert für die Unfalldunkelziffer in der Pilotstudie wird ein Wert von 44 % angesehen. Die Untersuchung zeigt eine deutliche Abhängigkeit der Dunkelziffer von der Unfallschwere. Die Dunkelziffer liegt geringer bei Unfällen mit "ungeschützten" Unfallobjekten (Unfälle mit Fußgängern und Zweiradfahrern). Der Erfassungsgrad für Nachtunfälle ist größer als für Tagunfälle. Die Untersuchungsergebnisse zeigen insgesamt, dass die Struktur der amtlichen Statistik deutlich von der Struktur des Dunkelfeldes abweicht. Es wird die begründete Annahme ausgesprochen, dass die amtliche Verkehrsunfallstatistik unvollständig ist, wobei der Erfassungsgrad nicht einheitlich ist, sondern von verschiedenen Merkmalen (Unfallschwere, Unfallart, etc.) abhängt.
Im Anschluss an Erörterungen über das Problem der Unfallstellenbeseitigung und einen Überblick über die Kenngrößen zur Unfallstellenerkennung werden bisherige Verfahren erörtert. Anschließend werden Identifikationsmodelle vorgestellt, die die Gesichtspunkte Unfallhäufigkeit, Unfallschwere und mittleres Risiko jeweils in einem geschlossenen Modell vereinigen. Die Anwendung ist möglich sowohl für den Innerorts- als auch fuü den Ausserortsbereich des Straßennetzes. Um praktische Erfahrung in die Vorschläge zur Grenzwertfestlegung einfließen zu lassen, fand eine versuchsweise Anwendung der Modelle auf Unfalldaten des klassifizierten Straßennetzes im Regierungsbezirk Karlsruhe statt. Mit den Ergebnissen der versuchsweisen Anwendung wurden die theoretischen Annahmen des Arbeitskreises abgesichert. Daneben erfolgte eine Sensitivitätsanalyse für die Modellparameter, die zur Empfehlung bestimmter Werte führte. Die Ergebnisse fügen sich in die von Bund und Ländern entwickelte Auswertungskonzeption ein. Das vorgestellte Identifikationsverfahren führt gegenüber der Unfalltypensteckkarte zu einer besseren Unfallstellenerkennung, kann jedoch nicht in allen Belangen die Unfalltypensteckkarte ersetzen.
Aus der Gegenüberstellung der in England und in Deutschland ermittelten Kenngrößen konnten Vermutungen beziehungsweise Tendenzen bezüglich der Verhaltensweisen abgeleitet werden. Die durch die ermittelten Daten fundierten Aussagen lassen sich wie folgt zusammenfassen: - Die deutschen Fahrer nutzen im Mittel kleinere Zeitlücken beziehungsweise Zeitdifferenzen zum Einfahren in den Hauptstrom als die englischen Fahrer, weshalb ein riskanteres Verhalten vermutet werden kann. - Auf deutschen Landstraßen scheint schneller gefahren zu werden als auf englischen Landstraßen. - Die deutschen Fahrer nähern sich im Nebenstrom dem Knoten mit höherer Geschwindigkeit als die englischen Fahrer, was ebenfalls auf eine größere Risikobereitschaft oder sogar größere Aggressivität schließen läßt. Bezüglich des Unfallgeschehens lässt sich daher vermuten, dass in Deutschland durch riskanteres Einfahren in die Hauptstraße die Unfallzahl, und durch höhere Geschwindigkeiten die Unfallschwere erhöht werden. Es lässt sich weiter vermuten, dass die englische Fahrweise, da sich die Fahrer langsamer der Einmündung nähern, defensiver ist, woraus sich günstige Auswirkungen auf das Unfallgeschehen ergeben. In dieser Studie wurden am Beispiel der Einmündung die Probleme solcher Messungen und Vergleiche aufgezeigt und versucht, die Risikoakzeptanz messtechnisch zu quantifizieren; anhand der Ergebnisse konnte dabei generell ein etwas riskanteres Verhalten der deutschen Fahrer festgestellt werden. Die Aussagen beziehen sich dabei natürlich zunächst nur auf die den Messungen zugrundeliegenden Einmündungen. Um allgemeingültige Aussagen zum Verhalten der Verkehrsteilnehmer zu erhalten, bedarf es weiterführender Untersuchungen, in die weitere typische Verkehrssituationen mit entsprechenden Aufgaben für die Verkehrsteilnehmer aufgenommen werden.