Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (15) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (8)
- Article (3)
- Book (2)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
Language
- English (9)
- German (5)
- Multiple languages (1)
Keywords
- Anfahrversuch (9)
- Bewertung (9)
- Evaluation (assessment) (9)
- Compatibility (8)
- Fahrzeug (8)
- Kompatibilität (8)
- Method (8)
- Safety (8)
- Sicherheit (8)
- Vehicle (8)
- Verfahren (8)
- Impact test (veh) (7)
- Schlag (7)
- Shock (7)
- Test (7)
- Versuch (7)
- Deutschland (3)
- Germany (3)
- Measurement (3)
- Messung (3)
- Telematics (3)
- Telematik (3)
- Driver assistance system (2)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (2)
- Forschungsbericht (2)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (2)
- Head on collision (2)
- Impact test (2)
- Prüfverfahren (2)
- Test method (2)
- Verkehrssteuerung (2)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Airbag (1)
- Anthropometric dummy (1)
- Baustelle (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Car park (1)
- Collision (1)
- Communication (1)
- Construction site (1)
- Contact (tyre road) (1)
- Deformation (1)
- Detection (1)
- Detektion (1)
- Driver (1)
- Driver information (1)
- Dummy (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Electroencephalography (1)
- Elektroencephalographie (1)
- Eye movement (1)
- Fahrbahnmarkierung (1)
- Fahrer (1)
- Fahrerinformation (1)
- Fatigue (human) (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Frequenz (1)
- Improvement (1)
- Incident detection (1)
- Intelligent transport system (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interview (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (1)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (1)
- Lidschlag (1)
- Lkw (1)
- Lorry (1)
- Lärm (1)
- Matrix (1)
- Model (not math) (1)
- Modell (1)
- Müdigkeit (1)
- Nacht (1)
- Nasse Straße (1)
- Night (1)
- Noise (1)
- Oberflächentextur (1)
- Parken (1)
- Parkfläche (1)
- Parking (1)
- Parking place (one veh only) (1)
- Parkstand (einzeln) (1)
- Planning (1)
- Planung (1)
- Quality (1)
- Qualität (1)
- Research report (1)
- Road marking (1)
- Schallpegel (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Service area (1)
- Sichtbarkeit (1)
- Simulation (1)
- Sound level (1)
- Spectrum (1)
- Spektrum (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Steering (process) (1)
- Störfallentdeckung (1)
- Surface texture (1)
- Tank Rast Anlage (1)
- Traffic Control (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Verbesserung (1)
- Verformung (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Visibility (1)
- Wet road (1)
- Zusammenstoß (1)
Institute
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (15) (remove)
Accident analysis
(2014)
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the EC funded FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in today- research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The specific objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were: - Determine if previously identified compatibility issues are still relevant in current vehicle fleet: Structural interaction, Frontal force matching, Compartment strength in particular for light cars. - Determine nature of injuries and injury mechanisms: Body regions injured o Injury mechanism: Contact with intrusion, Contact, Deceleration / restraint induced. The main data sources for this report were the CCIS and Stats 19 databases from Great Britain and the GIDAS database from Germany. The different sampling and reporting schemes for the detailed databases (CCIS & GIDAS) sometimes do not allow for direct comparisons of the results. However the databases are complementary " CCIS captures more severe collisions highlighting structure and injury issues while GIDAS provides detailed data for a broader range of crash severities. The following results represent the critical points for further development of test procedures in FIMCAR.
In the European Project FIMCAR, a proposal for a frontal impact test configuration was developed which included an additional full width deformable barrier (FWDB) test. Motivation for the deformable element was partly to measure structural forces as well as to produce a severe crash pulse different from that in the offset test. The objective of this study was to analyze the safety performance of vehicles in the full width rigid barrier test (FWRB) and in the full width deformable barrier test (FWDB). In total, 12 vehicles were crashed in both configurations. Comparison of these tests to real world accident data was used to identify the crash barrier most representative of real world crashes. For all vehicles, the airbag visible times were later in the FWDB configuration. This was attributed to the attenuation of the initial acceleration peak, observed in FWRB tests, by the addition of the deformable element. These findings were in alignment with airbag triggering times seen in real world crash data. Also, the dummy loadings were slightly worse in FWDB compared to FWRB tests, which is possibly linked to the airbag firing and a more realistic loading of the vehicle crash structures in the FWDB configuration. Evaluations of the lower extremities have shown a general increasing of the tibia index with the crash pulse severity.
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
The goal of the project FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) was to define an integrated set of test procedures and associated metrics to assess a vehicle's frontal impact protection, which includes self- and partner-protection. For the development of the set, two different full-width tests (full-width deformable barrier [FWDB] test, full-width rigid barrier test) and three different offset tests (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test, progressive deformable barrier [PDB] test, moveable deformable barrier with the PDB barrier face [MPDB] test) have been investigated. Different compatibility assessment procedures were analysed and metrics for assessing structural interaction (structural alignment, vertical and horizontal load spreading) as well as several promising metrics for the PDB/MPDB barrier were developed. The final assessment approach consists of a combination of the most suitable full-width and offset tests. For the full-width test (FWDB), a metric was developed to address structural alignment based on load cell wall information in the first 40 ms of the test. For the offset test (ODB), the existing ECE R94 was chosen. Within the paper, an overview of the final assessment approach for the frontal impact test procedures and their development is given.
Die Initiative der Einführung kooperativer Systeme in einem Korridor von Rotterdam über Frankfurt/Main nach Wien, dem sogenannten C-ITS Corridor, und damit auch in Deutschland wurde im Juni 2013 durch die Unterzeichnung einer entsprechenden Absichtserklärung des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung mit den Verkehrsministern der Niederlande und Österreichs offiziell gestartet. In vielen Forschungsprojekten wurden vorher die Grundlagen erarbeitet, um eine solche Einführung technisch überhaupt erst möglich zu machen. Im Beitrag werden diese Ergebnisse nochmals kurz aufgegriffen und um den aktuellen Stand bei den Entwicklungen im C-ITS Corridor erweitert. Als erstes Einführungsszenario wurden die Baustellenwarnung und Kooperatives Verkehrsmanagement unter Einbeziehung von Fahrzeugdaten gewählt. Nicht verschwiegen werden sollen hierbei auch die wesentlichen Herausforderungen, die im Übergang von Forschung und Feldtests zu realen Anwendungen liegen.
Müdigkeit am Steuer ist eine bedeutsame Ursache von Straßenverkehrsunfällen. Es steht eine Fülle unterschiedlicher Methoden zur Verfügung, um Müdigkeit beim Fahrer zu erkennen. Ziel des vorliegenden Projekts war es, auf Basis einer mehrstufigen Befragung von zwölf Experten aus Industrie- und Hochschulforschung die Stärken und Schwächen der derzeit validesten objektiven Müdigkeitsmessverfahren vergleichend zu beschreiben. Als Basis der Bewertung diente ein eigens erarbeiteter Gütekriterienkatalog. Zu den validesten Müdigkeitsmessverfahren gehören aus Expertensicht Lenkverhalten und Spurhaltung, Indikatoren des Lidschlussverhaltens und des EEG, das videobasierte Expertenrating sowie der kontrovers diskutierte Pupillografische Schläfrigkeitstest. Die Güteprofile der sechs ausgewählten Messverfahren werden aufgeführt. Je nach Einsatzgebiet sind alle ausgewählten Messverfahren (Forschung und Entwicklung), nur einige (Müdigkeitswarnsystem im Fahrzeug), oder kein einziges (Verkehrskontrolle) geeignet. Dem Urteil der Experten nach bedarf eine valide Müdigkeitserfassung der Kombination von mindestens zwei Messverfahren unter Berücksichtigung der spezifischen Stärke-Schwächenprofile.
Der vom 01.01.2012 bis zum 31.12.2016 andauernde Feldversuch der Bundesregierung mit Lang-Lkw wird durch die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) wissenschaftlich begleitet. Lang-Lkw sind Fahrzeuge und Fahrzeugkombinationen, - die mit bis zu 25,25 m zwar länger als nach den geltenden Regelungen ausgeführt sein dürfen, - im Vergleich zu herkömmlichen Lkw um bis zu 6,50 m länger sind, - aber kein höheres Gesamtgewicht als die auch heute schon geltenden 40 t beziehungsweise 44 t im Vor- und Nachlauf zum Kombinierten Verkehr haben. Im Feldversuch werden die Chancen und Risiken des Einsatzes der Lang-Lkw untersucht. Nach etwa der Hälfte des Feldversuchs wurden die wesentlichen Erkenntnisse aus dem bisherigen Untersuchungszeitraum in einem Zwischenbericht von der BASt zusammengefasst und bewertet. Der Zwischenbericht der BASt gliedert sich thematisch und enthält neben den für die Konzeption der Gesamtuntersuchung erforderlichen rechtlichen Grundlagen und vorliegenden Erkenntnissen aus der Literatur insbesondere die Zusammenfassungen verschiedener Forschungsprojekte zu den hinsichtlich des Einsatzes von Lang-Lkw relevanten Fragestellungen. Die Teilprojekte, die von externen Forschungsnehmern bearbeitet wurden, sind als selbstständige Publikationen verfügbar. Dort finden sich detailliertere Informationen zu den einzelnen Untersuchungen. Insgesamt galt es herauszuarbeiten, welche Auswirkungen der Einsatz von Lang-Lkw im Vergleich zur Situation ohne Lang-Lkw auf die identifizierten Fragestellungen hat. Zusammenfassend lässt sich feststellen, dass sich neben den festgestellten positiven Effekten, wie einem Effizienzgewinn und der Einsparung von Lkw-Fahrten, gravierende Probleme im Feldversuch unter den gegebenen Randbedingungen bislang nicht gezeigt haben. Gemessen an der Vielzahl betrachteter Fragestellungen ist die Anzahl der identifizierten Risiken gering. Zudem sind die identifizierten Risiken bei der derzeit vorhandenen Anzahl von im Feldversuch beteiligten Lang-Lkw und auch noch unter der Annahme von deutlich höheren Anteilen von Lang-Lkw am Güterverkehrsaufkommen als hinnehmbar oder zumindest beherrschbar einzustufen. Einzig für den Umstand der für Lang-Lkw in der Regel zu kurzen Schrägparkstände auf Rastanlagen müssten bei einer steigenden Anzahl an Lang-Lkw Lösungsansätze entwickelt werden, um das regelkonforme Abstellen der Lang-Lkw auch auf Rastanlagen weiterhin gewährleisten zu können. Zu beachten ist hinsichtlich der Gesamteinschätzung zudem, dass den erzielten Ergebnissen in der Regel die ganz spezifischen Randbedingungen des Feldversuchs zugrunde liegen. Teilweise resultieren diese Randbedingungen aus den Vorgaben der Ausnahme-Verordnung zum Feldversuch, in Einzelfällen auch aus dem unter Versuchsbedingungen angepassten Verhalten der Lang-Lkw-Fahrer. Sofern sich an diesen Randbedingungen Änderungen einstellen sollten oder die Unternehmen die heute geltenden Freiheitsgrade deutlicher ausnutzen, sind gewisse Fragestellungen neu zu beleuchten. Somit zeigt der Zwischenbericht in seinem Fazit zusammenfassend auf, dass an einzelnen Punkten weiter Forschungsbedarf besteht. Bis zum Ende des Feldversuchs wird die BASt diesen Fragen nachgehen und Nacherhebungen zur Validierung der bisherigen Ergebnisse durchführen können.
The objectives of the FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) project are to answer the remaining open questions identified in earlier projects (such as understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of force based metrics and barrier deformation based metrics, confirmation of specific compatibility issues such as structural interaction, investigation of force matching) and to finalise the frontal impact test procedures required to assess compatibility. Research strategies and priorities were based on earlier research programs and the FIMCAR accident data analysis. The identified real world safety issues were used to develop a list of compatibility characteristics which were then prioritised within the consortium. This list was the basis for evaluating the different test candidates. This analysis resulted in the combination of the Full Width Deformable Barrier test (FWDB) with compatibility metrics and the existing Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) as described in UN-ECE Regulation 94 with additional cabin integrity requirement as being proposed as the FIMCAR assessment approach. The proposed frontal impact assessment approach addresses many of the issues identified by the FIMCAR consortium but not all frontal impact and compatibility issues could be addressed.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were to review existing full-width test procedures and their discussed compatibility metrics, to report recent activities and findings with respect to full-width assessment procedures and to assess test procedures and metrics. Starting with a review of previous work, candidate metrics and associated performance limits to assess a vehicle- structural interaction potential, in particular its structural alignment, have been developed for both the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB) and Full Width Rigid Barrier (FWRB) tests. Initial work was performed to develop a concept to assess a vehicle- frontal force matching. However, based on the accident analyses performed within FIMCAR frontal force matching was not evaluated as a first priority and thus in line with FIMCAR strategy the focus was put on the development of metrics for the assessment of structural interaction which was evaluated as a first priority.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and the final report to the steering committee on frontal impact [Faerber 2007] and the FP5 VC-COMPAT[Edwards 2007] project activities, two test approaches were identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis will be performed. In the FIMCAR Deliverable D 3.1 [Adolph 2013] the development and assessment of criteria and associated performance limits for the full width test procedure were reported. In this Deliverable D3.2 analyses of the test data (full width tests, car-to-car tests and component tests), further development and validation of the full width assessment protocol and development of the load cell and load cell wall specification are reported. The FIMCAR full-width assessment procedure consists of a 50 km/h test against the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB). The Load Cell Wall behind the deformable element assesses whether or not important Energy Absorbing Structures are within the Common Interaction Zone as defined based on the US part 581 zone. The metric evaluates the row forces and requires that the forces directly above and below the centre line of the Common Interaction Zone exceed a minimum threshold. Analysis of the load spreading showed that metrics that rely on sum forces of rows and columns are within acceptable tolerances. Furthermore it was concluded that the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the FWDB test is acceptable. The FWDB test was shown to be capable to detect lower load paths that are beneficial in car-to-car impacts.