Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (563)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (404)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (92)
- Bericht (23)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (14)
- Arbeitspapier (13)
Sprache
- Deutsch (771)
- Englisch (337)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Schlagworte
- Germany (575)
- Deutschland (574)
- Research report (413)
- Forschungsbericht (411)
- Conference (329)
- Konferenz (325)
- Accident (229)
- Unfall (229)
- Safety (225)
- Sicherheit (223)
Institut
- Sonstige (1109) (entfernen)
Within the COST Action TU1101 the working group WG 1 is dealing with acceptance criteria and problems in helmet use while bicycling concerning conspicuity, thermal stress, ventilation deficits and other potential confounding. To analyze the helmet usage practice of bicyclists in Europe a questionnaire was developed in the scope of working group 1 to collect relevant information by means of a field study. The questionnaire consists of some 66 questions covering the fields of personal data of the cyclist, riding und helmet usage habits, information concerning the helmet model and the sensation of the helmet, as well as information on previous bicycle accidents. A second complementary study is conducted to analyze if the use of a bicycle helmet influences the seating geometry and the posture of cyclists when riding a bicycle and if the if the helmet vertically limits the vision. For this purpose cyclists with and without helmets were photographed in real world situations and relevant geometrical values such as the decline of the torso, the head posture of the upper vertical vision limit due to the helmet were established from the photos. The interim results of the field studies which were conducted in Germany by the Hannover Medical School are presented in this study. Some 227 questionnaires were filled out, of which 67 participants had used a helmet and 42 of the 227 participants have had a bicycle accident before. For the analysis of the riding position and posture of the cyclist over 40 pictures of riders with a helmet and over 240 pictures of riders without a helmet were measured concerning the seating geometry to describe the influence of using a bicycle helmet. Some results in summary: From the riders interviewed with the questionnaire only 11% of the city bike riders and 12% of the mountain bike riders always used the helmet, while 38% of the racing bike riders and 88% of the e-bike-riders always used the helmet. The helmet use seems not to change the sensation of safety of cycling compared to the use of a car. The arguments for not wearing a helmet are mostly stated to be the short distance of a trip, high temperatures or carelessness and waste of time. The reasons for using a helmet are stated to be the feeling of safety and being used to using a helmet. Being a role model for others was also stated to be a reason for helmet use. Concerning the sensation of the helmet 9% of the riders reported problems with the field of vision when using a helmet, 57% saw the problem of sweating too much, and 10% reported headaches or other unpleasant symptoms like pressure on the forehead when using the helmet. The analysis of the seating posture from the pictures taken of cyclists revealed that older cyclists generally have a riding position where the handle bar is higher than the seat (0-° to 10-° incline from seat to handlebar), while younger riders had a higher variance (between -10-° decline and 20-° incline). Further, elderly riders and riders with helmets seem to have a more upright position of the upper body when cycling. The vertical vision limit due to the helmet is determined by the front rim of the helmet (mostly the sun shade). Typical values here range from 0-° (horizontal line from the eye to the sun shade) to 75-° upwards, in which elderly riders tend to have a slightly higher vertical vision limit possibly due to the helmet being worn more towards the face.
Although the statistics show a decreasing rate of child injuries and fatalities in German road accidents more efforts can be made to protect children in cars e.g. by developing appropriate child restraint systems. An important part in of this work can be achieved with the help of crash tests using child dummies. However these crash tests cannot completely reflect the situation of real world crashes as factors like children moving out of the optimal position or children incorrectly fastened by their parents are difficult to predict. Therefore this study gives an overview over the current accident and injury situation of child occupants in cars in German road accidents.
An increased use of bicycles comes along with an increased number of bicycle accidents. Bicycle accidents are more frequent than recorded by the police. To evaluate the real number of bicycle accidents during 12 months in Münster, Germany, injuries were collected by the Police and in each emergency unit anonymously. 2,153 patients had to be treated in a hospital, nearly triple the number of accidents that were registered by the police. Beside fractures of the upper extremities with major surgery, traumatic brain injuries were the leading cause for hospital admission. Bicycle helmet use can reduce traumatic brain injuries and the related number of deaths and hospital admissions. Laws on bicycle helmet might decrease the use of bicycles and therefore the reduction of positive health benefits. Other methods of accident prevention may lead to positive effects as helmet legislation as well, while having no reduction in bicycle use.
Ermittlung der Schadstoffbelastung in einem Tunnelbauwerk mit geschlitzter Decke an der EB 42 n
(1987)
Eine Schnellstraße durch einen Tunnel mit einer in der Mitte geschlitzten Decke zu führen, wie an der EB 42n im Bereich Königswinter-Oberdollendorf, ist in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland ohne Vorbild. Zur Klärung, welche Umweltbelastungen von einem derartigen Bauwerk ausgehen können, wurde in einer Messkampagne untersucht, welche Schadstoffbelastungen im Tunnel und außerhalb des Tunnels auftreten. Bei einem Verkehrsstau auf einer Richtungsfahrbahn von mehreren Kilometern Länge im Bereich des Tunnelbauwerkes wurden im Tunnel Kohlenmonoxidkonzentrationen gemessen, die um mehr als den Faktor 5 unter dem Grenzwert aus den Richtlinien für die Ausstattung und den Betrieb von Straßentunneln (RABT) lagen. Die Schadstoffbelastungen am Schlitz des Tunnels sind gering. Sie unterschreiten sowohl die Grenzwerte nach TA Luft, wie auch die Grenzwerte nach der VDI-Richtlinie 2310, die wegen fehlender Grenzwerte für den Straßenbau als Orientierungshilfen herangezogen wurden. Betrachtet wurden die Stoffe Kohlenmonoxid, Stickstoffdioxid und Ozon. Durch die Entwicklung eines physikalischen Modells zur Berechnung der Konzentrationsprofile in den beiden Tunnelröhren könnte das Prinzip der natürlichen Lüftung erklärt und gezeigt werden, dass ca. 75 % bis 78 % der im Tunnel emitierten Schadstoffe über den Schlitz in der Tunneldecke und die restlichen 22 % bis 25 % über die beiden Portale abgeführt werden. Unter dem Aspekt der Luftreinhaltung ist dieses Bauwerk als umweltfreundlich anzusehen.
As bearing capacity measurements become more and more important, the necessity of assuring quality by establishing a QA system becomes more relevant. Within this context, the FGSV recommends the introduction of comparative measurements. Since 2015, two pilot events took place, with the main aim of introducing repetitive comparative measurements, in which all FWD operators shall participate. The results of the comparative measurements show that the basic principles behind comparative measurements (of the FWD), elaborated as a Europe-wide consensus and put into practice in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, are valid, but still there is a variety of questions to be answered concerning certain details of the measuring system itself, e. g. measurement of the temperatures (air, pavement) and the impact of load introduction. All in all, the two pilot events in 2015 and 2016 proved that the comparability of the different FWD measuring devices is satisfactory.
Um ihre wichtige Verkehrsführungsfunktion vollständig erfüllen zu können, müssen Fahrbahnmarkierungen jederzeit eindeutig und unzweifelhaft erkennbar sein. Dies erfordert den flächendeckenden Einsatz von Typ II-Markierungen, weil nur sie auch bei Nacht und Nässe ausreichend erkennbar sind. Die in den Zusätzlichen Technischen Vertragsbedingungen und Richtlinien für Markierungsarbeiten im Straßenbau, Ausgabe 2002 (ZTV M 02) festgelegten verkehrstechnischen Eigenschaften für Typ II-Markierungen gelten für den Neu- und Gebrauchszustand. Sie stellen jedoch keine Beschaffenheits- oder Haltbarkeitsgarantie dar. Das bloße Unterschreiten eines Wertes beweist daher noch keinen Mangel. Nur wenn für die Wertunterschreitung ein Fehler ursächlich war, der der Markierung bereits zum Zeitpunkt der Abnahme irgendwie anhaftete, ist darin ein vom Auftragnehmer zu vertretener Mangel zu sehen. Normaler gebrauchsbedingter Verschleiß ist kein Mangel. Viele der vom Auftragnehmer zu vertretenden Fehler lassen sich nur bei oder unmittelbar nach der Applikation sicher feststellen. Die derzeit gängige Praxis, Markierungen erstmals wenige Tage vor Ablauf der Verjährungsfrist für Sachmangelansprüche zu begutachten beziehungsweise ausschließlich zu messen, sollte aufgegeben werden. Denn zu diesem Zeitpunkt lässt sich kaum noch feststellen, ob eine mögliche Wertunterschreitung vom Auftragnehmer zu vertreten ist oder nur normaler Verschleiß vorliegt. Es sollte verstärkt von den in den ZTV M 02 vorgesehenen Kontrollmechanismen bei der Applikation und an der fertigen Markierung durch fachkundiges Personal oder anerkannte Prüfstellen Gebrauch gemacht werden. Hierfür sollten Hinweise und Checklisten erstellt werden.
Since a number of human models have been developed it appears sensible to use these models also in the accident analysis. Especially the understanding of injury mechanisms and probably even injury risk curves can be significantly improved when interesting accidents are reconstructed using human body models. However, an important limitation for utilising human models for accident reconstruction is the effort needed to develop detailed FE models of the accident partners or to prepare the human model reconstruction by running physical accident reconstructions. The proposed approach for using human models for accident reconstruction is to use simplified and parametric car models. These models can be adapted to the crash opponents in a fast and cost effective way. Although, accuracy is less compared to detailed FE models, the relevant change in velocity can be simulated well, indicating that the computation of a detailed crash pulse is not needed. Two frontal impact test accidents that were reconstructed experimentally and using the parametric car models are indicating sufficient correlation of the adapted parametric car models with the full scale crash reconstructions. However, further developments of the parametric models to be capable for the use in lateral impacts and rear impacts are needed. For the PC Crash simulation runs the output sampling rate is too large to allow sufficient analysis. In addition the performance appears to be too general.
Within the process of integrating passenger airbags in the vehicle fleet a problem of compatibility between the passenger airbag and rear-facing child restraint systems was recognised. Especially in the US several accidents with children killed by the passenger airbag were recorded. Taking into account these accidents the deactivation of a present passenger airbag is mandatory if a child is carried in a rear-facing child restraint system at the front passenger seat in all member states of the European Union. This rule is in force since the deadline of 2003/20/EC at the latest. In the past a passenger airbag either could not be disabled or could only be disabled by a garage. Today there are a lot of different possibilities for the car driver himself to disable the airbag. Solutions like an on/off-switch or the automatic detection of a child restraint system are mentioned as an example. Taking into account the need for the deactivation of front passenger airbags two types of misuse can occur: transportation of an infant while the airbag is (still) enabled and transportation of an adult, while the airbag is disabled, respectively. Within a research project funded by BASt both options of misuse were analysed utilising two different types of surveys amongst users (field observations and interviews, Internet-questionnaires). In addition both analysis of accident data and crash tests for an updated assessment of the injury risk caused by the front passenger airbag were conducted. Both surveys indicate a low risk of misuse. Most of the misuse cases were observed in older cars, which offer no easy way to disable the airbag. For systems, which detect a child seat automatically, no misuse could be found. The majority of misuses in cars equipped with a manual switch were caused by reasons of oblivion. Also the accident analysis indicates a minor risk of misuse. From more than 300 cases of the GIDAS accident sample that were analysed, only 24 children were using the front passenger seat in cars equipped with a front passenger airbag. In most of these cases the airbag was deactivated. When misuse occurred the injury severity was low. However, when analysing German single accidents the fatality risk caused by the front passenger airbag became obvious. From the technical point of view, there were important changes in the design of passenger airbags in recent years. Not only volume and shape were modified, but also the mounting position of the entire airbag module was changed fundamentally. Even if these findings do not allow obtaining general conclusions, a clear tendency of less danger by airbags could be identified. For future vehicle development a safe combination of airbags and rear faced baby seats seems to be possible in the long term. This would mean that both types of misuse could be eliminated. For parents an easier use of child seat and car would be the result.
The share of high-tensile steel in car bodies has increased over the last years. While occupant safety has generally benefited from this measure, there is a potential risk that, as a result, rescue time may increase considerably. In more than 60% of all car occupant fatalities a technical rescue has been necessary. These are in particular those cases where occupants die immediately at the accident scene. Therefore, in these cases "rescue time" is a very sensitive parameter. In addition to the general analysis of the need of technical rescue and the actual rescue time depending on model years, the injury pattern of occupants requiring technical rescue will be analysed to provide advice for rescue teams. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of rescue measures for the most popular car models depending on the safety cell design is given.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions, the crash compatibility between the colliding vehicles is crucial. Compatibility compromises both the self protection and the partner protection properties of vehicles. For the accident data analysis, the CCIS (GB) and GIDAS (DE) in-depth data bases were used. Selection criteria were frontal car accidents with car in compliance with ECE R94. For this study belted adult occupants in the front seats sustaining MAIS 2+ injuries were studied. Following this analysis FIMCAR concluded that the following compatibility issues are relevant: - Poor structural interaction (especially low overlap and over/underriding) - Compartment strength - Frontal force mismatch with lower priority than poor structural interaction In addition injuries arising from the acceleration loading of the occupant are present in a significant portion of frontal crashes. Based on the findings of the accident analysis the aims that shall be addressed by the proposed assessment approach were defined and priorities were allocated to them. The aims and priorities shall help to decide on suitable test procedures and appropriate metrics. In general it is anticipated that a full overlap and off-set test procedure is the most appropriate set of tests to assess a vehicle- frontal impact self and partner protection.