Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (48)
- Deutsch (5)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (54) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Bewertung (18)
- Evaluation (assessment) (18)
- Anfahrversuch (17)
- Test method (17)
- Prüfverfahren (16)
- Conference (15)
- Impact test (veh) (15)
- Konferenz (15)
- Dummy (14)
- Anthropometric dummy (13)
- Safety (13)
- Sicherheit (13)
- Injury (12)
- Verletzung (12)
- Fußgänger (11)
- Pedestrian (11)
- Accident (10)
- Collision (10)
- Driver assistance system (10)
- Unfall (10)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (9)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (9)
- Head on collision (9)
- Zusammenstoß (9)
- Analyse (math) (8)
- Analysis (math) (8)
- Biomechanics (8)
- Biomechanik (8)
- Simulation (8)
- Radfahrer (7)
- Child (6)
- Cyclist (6)
- Deutschland (6)
- Europa (6)
- Europe (6)
- Fahrzeug (6)
- Germany (6)
- Head (6)
- Kind (6)
- Kopf (6)
- Passive safety system (6)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (6)
- Severity (accid, injury) (6)
- Verletzung) (6)
- injury) (6)
- Car (5)
- Driver (5)
- Fahrer (5)
- Impact test (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Vehicle (5)
- Alte Leute (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Compatibility (4)
- Deformation (4)
- Improvement (4)
- Insasse (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Kompatibilität (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Safety belt (4)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (4)
- Severity (accid (4)
- Sicherheitsgurt (4)
- Side impact (4)
- Standardisierung (4)
- Standardization (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Vehicle occupant (4)
- Verbesserung (4)
- Accident prevention (3)
- Aufprallschlitten (3)
- Autonomes Fahren (3)
- Autonomous driving (3)
- Behaviour (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Belastung (3)
- Bemessung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Braking (3)
- Bremsung (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (3)
- Design (overall design) (3)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (3)
- Fahrzeugsitz (3)
- Fatality (3)
- Gesetzgebung (3)
- Impact sled (3)
- Interior (veh) (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Load (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Old people (3)
- Pkw (3)
- Seat (veh) (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Statistik (3)
- Technologie (3)
- Technology (3)
- Tödlicher Unfall (3)
- Unfallverhütung (3)
- Use (3)
- Verformung (3)
- Verhalten (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Airbag (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Ausrüstung (2)
- Automatic (2)
- Automatisch (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Cervical vertebrae (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Database (2)
- Datenbank (2)
- Development (2)
- Driver information (2)
- Entwicklung (2)
- Equipment (2)
- Error (2)
- Fahrerinformation (2)
- Fahrstabilität (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Forschungsarbeit (2)
- Front (2)
- Gewicht (2)
- Halswirbel (2)
- Hospital (2)
- Human body (2)
- Intelligent transport system (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Krankenhaus (2)
- Measurement (2)
- Menschlicher Körper (2)
- Messung (2)
- Modification (2)
- Motorcycle (2)
- Motorrad (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- Research project (2)
- Severity (acid (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Spinal column (2)
- Test (2)
- Traffic (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Vehicle handling (2)
- Verkehr (2)
- Versuch (2)
- Veränderung (2)
- Weight (2)
- Wirbelsäule (2)
- (menschl) (1)
- Abnutzung (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Active safety system (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anhänger (1)
- Anthropmetric dummy (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Apparatus (measuring) (1)
- Asphaltstraße (Oberbau) (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Baustelle (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Bein (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Bridge (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Brücke (1)
- Cadaver (1)
- Cause (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Communication (1)
- Construction site (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Cost benefit analysis (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Data security (1)
- Datenerfassung (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Deceleration (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Detection (1)
- Detektion (1)
- Disabled person (1)
- Driving (veh) (1)
- Durability (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electroencephalography (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektroencephalographie (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Empfindlichkeit (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- Eye movement (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugführung (1)
- Failure (1)
- Fatigue (human) (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Flexible pavement (1)
- Foot (not a measure) (1)
- Force (1)
- Forschungsbericht (1)
- Frau (1)
- Fuß (1)
- Haftung (jur) (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Incident detection (1)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interface (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Interview (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knie (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Kraft (1)
- Kraftfahrzeug (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Leichnam (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (1)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (1)
- Liability (1)
- Lidschlag (1)
- Lkw (1)
- Lorry (1)
- Mathematical model (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Messgerät (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Müdigkeit (1)
- On the spot accident investigation (1)
- Optimum (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Pavement Management System (1)
- Pavement management system (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Prototyp (1)
- Prototype (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Quality (1)
- Qualität (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Rechenmodell (1)
- Research report (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Risiko (1)
- Risk (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Rutting (wheel) (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Schnittstelle (1)
- Schutz (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Seite (1)
- Sensitivity (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Side (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Spain (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Spurrinne (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steering (process) (1)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (1)
- Stress (psychol) (1)
- Störfallentdeckung (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic regulations (1)
- Trailer (1)
- Transport (1)
- USA (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (1)
- Ursache (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle regulations (1)
- Verhütung (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Verzögerung (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Wear (1)
- Windschutzscheibe (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zusammenstoss (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (54) (entfernen)
Motorcycling is a fascinating kind of transportation. While the riders' direct exposure to the environment and the unique driving dynamics are essential to this fascination, they both cause a risk potential which is several times higher than when driving a car. This chapter gives a detailed introduction to the fundamentals of motorcycle dynamics and shows how its peculiarities and limitations place high demands on the layout of dynamics control systems, especially when cornering. The basic principles of dynamic stabilization and directional control are addressed along with four characteristic modes of instability (capsize, wobble, weave, and kickback). Special attention is given to the challenges of braking (brake force distribution, dynamic over-braking, kinematic instability, and brake steer torque induced righting behavior). It is explained how these challenges are addressed by state-of-the-art brake, traction, and suspension control systems in terms of system layout and principles of function. It is illustrated how the integration of additional sensors " essentially roll angle assessment " enhances the cornering performance in all three categories, fostering a trend to higher system integration levels. An outlook on potential future control systems shows exemplarily how the undesired righting behavior when braking in curves can be controlled, e.g., by means of a so-called brake steer torque avoidance mechanism (BSTAM), forming the basis for predictive brake assist (PBA) or even autonomous emergency braking (AEB). Finally, the very limited potential of brake and chassis control to stabilize yaw and roll motion during unbraked cornering accidents is regarded, closing with a promising glance at roll stabilization through a pair of gimbaled gyroscopes.
The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Informal Group on GTR No. 7 Phase 2 are working to define a build level for the BioRID II rear impact (whiplash) crash test dummy that ensures repeatable and reproducible performance in a test procedure that has been proposed for future legislation. This includes the specification of dummy hardware, as well as the development of comprehensive certification procedures for the dummy. This study evaluated whether the dummy build level and certification procedures deliver the desired level of repeatability and reproducibility. A custom-designed laboratory seat was made using the seat base, back, and head restraint from a production car seat to ensure a representative interface with the dummy. The seat back was reinforced for use in multiple tests and the recliner mechanism was replaced by an external spring-damper mechanism. A total of 65 tests were performed with 6 BioRID IIg dummies using the draft GTR No.7 sled pulse and seating procedure. All dummies were subject to the build, maintenance, and certification procedures defined by the Informal Group. The test condition was highly repeatable, with a very repeatable pulse, a well-controlled seat back response, and minimal observed degradation of seat foams. The results showed qualitatively reasonable repeatability and reproducibility for the upper torso and head accelerations, as well as for T1 Fx and upper neck Fx. However, reproducibility was not acceptable for T1 and upper neck Fz or for T1 and upper neck My. The Informal Group has not selected injury or seat assessment criteria for use with BioRID II, so it is not known whether these channels would be used in the regulation. However, the ramping-up behavior of the dummy showed poor reproducibility, which would be expected to affect the reproducibility of dummy measurements in general. Pelvis and spine characteristics were found to significantly influence the dummy measurements for which poor reproducibility was observed. It was also observed that the primary neck response in these tests was flexion, not extension. This correlates well with recent findings from Japan and the United States showing a correlation between neck flexion and injury in accident replication simulations and postmortem human subjects (PMHS) studies, respectively. The present certification tests may not adequately control front cervical spine bumper characteristics, which are important for neck flexion response. The certification sled test also does not include the pelvis and so cannot be used to control pelvis response and does not substantially load the lumbar bumpers and so does not control these parts of the dummy. The stiffness of all spine bumpers and of the pelvis flesh should be much more tightly controlled. It is recommended that a method for certifying the front cervical bumpers should be developed. Recommendations are also made for tighter tolerance on the input parameters for the existing certification tests.
Automated driving will provide many kinds of benefits - some direct and some indirect. The benefits originate at the individual level, from changes in the behaviour of drivers and travellers with regard to driving and mobility, ending up with benefits at the social level via changes in the whole transport system and society, where many of the current planning and operations paradigms are likely to be transformed by automated driving. There may also be disbenefits, particularly at a social level, for example in intensity of travel which could result in additional congestion and increased use of natural resources. There may also be unintended consequences. For example, we do not know the impacts on public transport: driverless vehicles could provide a means to a lower cost service provision, but the availability of automated cars could lead to more car travel at the expense of collective transport.
Established in 1997, the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) provides consumers with a safety performance assessment for the majority of the most popular cars in Europe. Thanks to its rigorous crash tests, Euro NCAP has rapidly become an important driver safety improvement to new cars. After ten years of rating vehicles, Euro NCAP felt that a change was necessary to stay in tune with rapidly emerging driver assistance and crash avoidance systems and to respond to shifting priorities in road safety. A new overall rating system was introduced that combines the most important aspects of vehicle safety under a single star rating. The overall rating system has allowed Euro NCAP to continue to push for better fitment and higher performance for vehicles sold on the European market. In the coming years, the safety rating is expected to play an important role in the support of the roll-out of highly automated vehicles.
Side-impact safety of passenger cars is assessed in Europe in a full-scale test using a moving barrier. The front of this barrier is deformable and represents the stiffness of an 'average' car. The EU Directive 96/27/EC on side impact protection has adopted the EEVC Side Impact Test Procedure, including the original performance specification for the barrier face when impacting a flat dynamometric rigid wall. The requirements of the deformable barrier face, as laid down in the Directive, are related to geometrical characteristics, deformation characteristics and energy dissipation figures. Due to these limited requirements, many variations are possible in designing a deformable barrier face. As a result, several barrier face designs are in the market. However, research institutes and car manufacturers report significant difference in test results when using these different devices. It appears that the present approval test is not able to distinguish between the different designs that may perform differently when they impact real vehicles. Therefore, EEVC Working Group 13 has developed a number of tests to evaluate the different designs. In these tests the barrier faces are loaded and deformed in a specific and/or more representative way. Barrier faces of different design have been evaluated. In the paper the set-up and the reasoning behind the tests is presented. Results showing specific differences in performance are demonstrated.
The term test procedure refers to a method that describes how a system has to be tested to identify and assess specific behavior or properties by experiments. This also includes the specification of required tools, equipment, boundary conditions, and evaluation methods. Test procedures are an essential tool to check whether desired product properties are present, which of course also applies to the development of driver assistance systems. In addition to development and release testing that mainly is performed by the vehicle or system manufacturer, there are tests with the purpose of an independent product testing that are conducted by external test organizations. These tests are needed for vehicle type approval (for admission to a specific market), in the context of applying the standard for functional safety (in both cases mainly executed by technical services (being accredited as certification laboratory)) or for customer information purposes (by a test institute for consumer protection). The focus of this chapter is these "external" test methods. After a taxonomy of test procedures, the differences between legislation (type approval) and consumer testing are highlighted. Typical tests and the associated test setup, tools, and assessment criteria are discussed, and an outlook toward testing in the near and mid-future is given.
The Swedish National Road Administration (SNRA), the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) and the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) are co-operating in the International Harmonized Research Activities on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IHRA-ITS). Under this umbrella a joint study was conducted. The overall objective of this study was to contribute to the definition and validation of a "battery of tools" which enables a prediction and an assessment of changes in driver workload due to the use of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) while driving. In this sense \"validation\" means to produce empirical evidence from which it can be concluded that these methods reliably discriminate between IVIS which differ in terms of relevant features of the HMI-design. Additionally these methods should also be sensitive to the task demands imposed on the driver by the traffic situation and their interactions with HMI-design. To achieve these goals experimental validation studies (on-road and in the simulator) were performed in Sweden, Germany and Japan. As a common element these studies focused on the secondary task methodology as an approach to the study of driver workload. In a joint German-Swedish on-road study the Peripheral Detection Task (PDT) was assessed with respect to its sensitivity to the complexity of traffic situations and effects of different types of navigation systems. Results show that the PDT performance of both the German and the Swedish subjects reflects the task demands of the traffic situations better than those of the IVIS. However, alternative explanations are possible which will be examined by further analyses. Results of this study are supplemented by the Japanese study where informational demands induced by various traffic situations were analysed by using a simple arithmetic task as a secondary task. Results of this study show that relatively large task demands can be expected even from simple traffic situations.
Wegen der wachsenden Verbreitung von Fahrradanhängern zum Kindertransport und der möglichen Unfallgefährdung ist im vorliegenden Forschungsprojekt deren passive Sicherheit untersucht worden. Zudem wurde der Frage nachgegangen, ob der Transport von Kindern im Fahrradanhänger sicherer ist als mit dem Fahrrad mit Kindersitzen. In Absprache mit Herstellern und Vertreibern wurden verschiedene Untersuchungen durchgeführt. Es handelte sich um Anprallversuche (Anfahrversuche), Rollwagenversuche (Schlittenversuche) sowie Kopffreiheitsprüfungen und Fallversuche. Bei den Versuchen waren die Prüfobjekte mit einem oder zwei Dummies besetzt, die mit Messdatenaufnehmern ausgestattet waren. Verschiedene Messdaten, zum Beispiel Kopf- und Brustbeschleunigung, wurden erfasst und ausgewertet. Zusätzlich wurde das Kopfschutzkriterium (HPC) berechnet und bewertet. Entstandene Schäden an den Prüfobjekten wurden aufgenommen und durch Fotos dokumentiert. Die Versuchsabläufe selbst wurden mit Hochgeschwindigkeitskameras aus verschiedenen Positionen aufgezeichnet. Beim Anfahrversuch mit einem Pkw gegen ein Gespann aus Fahrrad und Anhänger waren direkte Anstöße der Anhängerinsassen an die Pkw-Front zu erkennen. Die Beschleunigungswerte waren dabei relativ hoch. Anstöße gegen Anhängerinnenteile waren bei fast allen Versuchen zu beobachten. Teilweise wurden Radaufhängungen und Radnaben beschädigt. Durch die Rollwagenversuche wurden konstruktive Schwächen bei den Sitzen und Rückhaltesystemen festgestellt. Nähte, Befestigungen und Verstellösen wurden zerstört. Es stellte sich heraus, dass die Qualität des Gurtsystems, die Steifigkeit des Anhängeraufbaus, die Sitzposition der Kinder und die vorhandene Kopffreiheit ausschlaggebend für das Verletzungsrisiko der Insassen sind. Bei den Versuchen mit Fahrradsitzen ergaben sich hohe Beschleunigungswerte durch den direkten Kontakt des Radfahrers mit der Fahrzeugfront und/oder der Fahrbahn. Das Gewicht des Radfahrers, des Fahrrades und auch Fahrradteile bergen ein erhöhtes Verletzungsrisiko für das Kind. Zusätzlich besteht die Gefahr überfahren zu werden, wenn das Kind nach dem Sturz des Fahrrades ungeschützt auf der Fahrbahn liegt. Ein direkter Vergleich der beiden Transportmöglichkeiten war aufgrund der geringen Daten der Versuche mit Fahrradkindersitzen nur bedingt möglich. Tendenziell ist der Transport der Kinder im Fahrradanhänger als weniger gefährlich zu bewerten. Es werden die Vor- und Nachteile dargestellt. Zur Bewertung der Sicherheit von Fahrradanhängern wurden die folgenden Prüfmethoden erarbeitet: - Pendelschlagprüfung für die gesamte Chassisstruktur; - Kopffreiheitsprüfung; - Belastungsprüfung der Aufbaustruktur; - Festigkeitsprüfung der Gurtsysteme. Die Prüfungen sind so aufgebaut, dass sie mit einfachen Mitteln durchzuführen sind. Es sollte somit jedem Anhängerhersteller möglich sein, die passive Sicherheit seiner Produkte umfassend zu untersuchen. Die Prüfverfahren für die Sicherheitsbewertung sollen in eine DIN-Norm und in das Merkblatt für Fahrradanhänger einfließen. Der Original-Forschungsbericht enthält einen umfangreichen Fotoband zu den Einzelheiten der Versuche und Versuchsaufbauten sowie zu den Beschädigungen der Prüfobjekte und kann bei der BASt eingesehen werden.
Die Kommunikation zwischen Fahrzeugen und Infrastrukturkomponenten steht vor der Einführung in Europa. Dieser Beitrag stellt zunächst die grundlegende Technologie zum Austausch von Nachrichten und ein Pilotprojekt vor, innerhalb dessen eine sichere Fahrzeug-zu-Infrastruktur Kommunikation konzipiert und praktisch erprobt wird. Darauf aufbauend werden Sicherheitsfragestellungen von Infrastrukturkomponenten beleuchtet und ein Einblick in das Schlüsselmanagement sowohl für Fahrzeuge als auch Infrastrukturkomponenten gegeben.
Safety of light goods vehicles - findings from the German joint project of BASt, DEKRA, UDV and VDA
(2011)
Light goods vehicles (LGVs) are an important part of the vehicle fleet, providing a vital component in the European transportation system. On the other hand, LGVs are in the focus of public discussion regarding road safety. In order to analyse the accident situation of LGVs in an objective manner, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt), VDA, DEKRA and German Insurers Accident Research (UDV) launched a joint project. The aim of this project, which will be finished by mid of 2011, is to identify reasonable measures which will further improve the safety of LGVs. For the first time, these partners jointly together conducted a research project and put together their know-how in accident research. Analyses are based on real-life accident data from the GIDAS database, the Accident Database of UDV (UDB), the DEKRA database and national statistics. The findings deliver answers to questions within the arena of future legislative actions and consumer protection activities. The analyses of databases cover areas of primary and secondary safety of LGVs with a special focus on advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), driver behaviour as well as partner and occupant protection. Key figures from national statistics are used to highlight hotspots of accidents of LGVs in Germany. Finally, the proposed countermeasures are assessed regarding their potential effectiveness. Amongst others, the results show that the accident situation of LGVs is very similar to that of passenger cars. Noteworthy variations could be found in collisions with pedestrians, at reversing and regarding accident causes. Occupant safety of LGVs is on a higher level compared to cars. Results indicate that seatbelt use is on a significantly lower level compared to cars. This leads to higher-than-average injury risk for unbelted LGV occupants. When it comes to partner protection, there are problems with compatibility at LGVs. For car occupants there is a very high injury risk when colliding with a LGV. It indicates that higher passive safety test standards for LGVs would be counterproductive if they further increase stiffness of LGVs. The analysis of LGV-pedestrian accidents shows that pedestrian kinematic differs significantly from car-pedestrian accidents. At this point, existing pedestrian related test standards developed for cars cannot be adopted to LGVs. When it comes to active safety, ESC proved its effectiveness once again. Beyond that, rear view cameras, advanced emergency braking systems and lane departure warning systems show a safety potential, too. In addition to any technical countermeasures previously discussed, the importance of the driver behavior and attitude regarding the accident risk was investigated. In order to develop successful actions it is important to understand the main target population. In the case of LGV especially the crafts business and smaller companies are the major contributors the safety issue.