Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (45) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (18)
- Konferenz (18)
- Impact test (veh) (16)
- Anfahrversuch (15)
- Test method (15)
- Bewertung (14)
- Evaluation (assessment) (14)
- Prüfverfahren (14)
- Anthropometric dummy (12)
- Dummy (12)
- Fußgänger (11)
- Injury (11)
- Pedestrian (11)
- Verletzung (11)
- Accident (9)
- Simulation (9)
- Unfall (9)
- Analyse (math) (8)
- Analysis (math) (8)
- Collision (8)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (8)
- Head on collision (8)
- Biomechanics (7)
- Biomechanik (7)
- Deutschland (7)
- Germany (7)
- Radfahrer (7)
- Safety (7)
- Sicherheit (7)
- Zusammenstoß (7)
- Child (6)
- Cyclist (6)
- Driver assistance system (6)
- Europa (6)
- Europe (6)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (6)
- Kind (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (6)
- Severity (accid, injury) (6)
- Car (5)
- Head (5)
- Insasse (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Kopf (5)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (5)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (5)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (5)
- Side impact (5)
- Vehicle occupant (5)
- Verletzung) (5)
- injury) (5)
- Alte Leute (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Driver (4)
- Fahrer (4)
- Fahrzeug (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Passive safety system (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Severity (accid (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Accident prevention (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Bemessung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Compatibility (3)
- Database (3)
- Datenbank (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (3)
- Design (overall design) (3)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (3)
- Fahrzeugsitz (3)
- Front (3)
- Improvement (3)
- Interior (veh) (3)
- Kompatibilität (3)
- Modification (3)
- Old people (3)
- Pkw (3)
- Seat (veh) (3)
- Standardisierung (3)
- Standardization (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Statistik (3)
- Unfallverhütung (3)
- Use (3)
- Vehicle (3)
- Verbesserung (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Active safety system (2)
- Airbag (2)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (2)
- Automatic (2)
- Automatisch (2)
- Autonomes Fahren (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous driving (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Belastung (2)
- Braking (2)
- Bremsung (2)
- Classification (2)
- Cost benefit analysis (2)
- Deformation (2)
- Driver information (2)
- Error (2)
- Fahrerinformation (2)
- Fahrstabilität (2)
- Fatality (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Forecast (2)
- Gesetzgebung (2)
- Hospital (2)
- Human body (2)
- Intelligent transport system (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Krankenhaus (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Load (2)
- Menschlicher Körper (2)
- Motorcyclist (2)
- Motorradfahrer (2)
- On the spot accident investigation (2)
- Prognose (2)
- Safety belt (2)
- Sicherheitsgurt (2)
- Technologie (2)
- Technology (2)
- Tödlicher Unfall (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (2)
- Vehicle handling (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (2)
- (menschl) (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Accident reconstruction (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anti locking device (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antikollisionssystem (1)
- Aufprallschlitten (1)
- Ausrüstung (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Bein (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Cause (1)
- Cervical vertebrae (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Collision avoidance system (1)
- Communication (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Crash Test (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Data security (1)
- Datenerfassung (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Detection (1)
- Detektion (1)
- Development (1)
- Durability (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Empfindlichkeit (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Equipment (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Foot (not a measure) (1)
- Forschungsarbeit (1)
- Frau (1)
- Fuß (1)
- Gewicht (1)
- Halswirbel (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Impact sled (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Impact test (1)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interface (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knie (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Kraftfahrzeug (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (1)
- Mathematical model (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Messung (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorcycle (1)
- Motorrad (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Norm (tech) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Prototyp (1)
- Prototype (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Rear (1)
- Rechenmodell (1)
- Reconstruction (accid) (1)
- Research project (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Risiko (1)
- Risk (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Schnittstelle (1)
- Schutz (1)
- Seite (1)
- Sensitivity (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Severity (acid (1)
- Side (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Spain (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Specification (standard) (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Spinal column (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Stress (psychol) (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Test (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Ursache (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle regulations (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verformung (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Versuch (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Weight (1)
- Windschutzscheibe (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirbelsäule (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zusammenstoss (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (45) (entfernen)
A flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been evaluated by a Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG) of the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN-ECE). It will be implemented within phase 2 of the global technical regulation (GTR 9) as well as within a new ECE regulation on pedestrian safety as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents (UN-ECE 2010-1, 2010-2 and 2010-3). Due to its biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia section, the FlexPLI is found to having an improved knee and tibia injury assessment ability when being compared to the current legislative test tool, the lower legform impactor developed by the Pedestrian Safety Working Group of the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC WG 17). However, due to a lack of biofidelity in terms of kinematics and loadings in the femur part of the FlexPLI, an appropriate assessment of femur injuries is still outstanding. The study described in this paper is aimed to close this gap. Impactor tests with the FlexPLI at different impact heights on three vehicle frontends with Sedan, SUV and FFV shape are performed and compared to tests with a modified FlexPLI with upper body mass. Full scale validation tests using a modified crash test dummy with attached FlexPLI that are carried out for the first time prove the more humanlike responses of the femur section with applied upper body mass. Apart from that they also show that the impact conditions described in the current technical provisions for tests with the FlexPLI don"t necessarily compensate the missing torso mass in terms of knee and tibia loadings either. Therefore it can be concluded that an applied upper body mass will contribute to a more biofidelic overall behavior of the legform and subsequently an improved injury assessment ability of all lower extremity injuries addressed by the FlexPLI. Nevertheless, the validity of the original as well as the modified legform for tests against vehicles with extraordinary high bumpers as well as flat front vehicles still needs to be evaluated in detail. A first clue is given by the application of an additional accelerometer to the legform.
A flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) with biofidelic characteristics is aimed to be implemented within global legislation on pedestrian protection. Therefore, it is being evaluated by a technical evaluation group (Flex-TEG) of GRSP with respect to its biofidelity, robustness, durability, usability and protection level (Zander, 2008). Previous studies at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and other laboratories already showed good progress concerning the general development, but also the need for further improvement and further research in various areas. An overview is provided of the different levels of development and all kinds of evaluation activities of the Flex-TEG, starting with the Polar II full scale pedestrian dummy as its origin and ending up with the latest legform impactor built level GTR that is expected to be finalized by the end of the year 2009. Using the latest built levels as a basis, gaps are revealed that should be closed by future developments, like the usage of an upper body mass (UBM), the validation of the femur loads, injury risk functions for the cruciate knee ligaments and an appropriate certification method. A recent study on an additional upper body mass being applied for the first time to the Flex-GT is used as means of validation of recently proposed modified impact conditions. Therefore, two test series on a modern vehicle front using an impactor with and without upper body mass are compared. A test series with the Flex-GTR will be used to study both the comparability of the impact behavior of the GT and GTR built level as well as the consistency of test results. Recommendations for implementation within legislation on pedestrian protection are made.
Supported by field accident data and monitoring results of European Regulation (EC) No. 78/2009, recent plans of the European Commission regarding a way forward to improve passive safety of vulnerable road users include, amongst other things, an extension of the head test area. The inclusion of passive cyclist safety is also being considered by Euro NCAP. Although passenger car to cyclist collisions are often severe and have a significant share within the accident statistics, cyclists are neither considered sufficiently in the legislative nor in the consumer ratings tests. Therefore, a test procedure to assess the protection potential of vehicle fronts in a collision with cyclists has been developed within a current research project. For this purpose, the existing pedestrian head impact test procedures were modified in order to include boundary conditions relevant for cyclists as the second big group of vulnerable road users. Based on an in-depth analysis of passenger car to cyclist accidents in Germany the three most representative accident constellations have been initially defined. The development of the test procedure itself was based on corresponding simulations with representative vehicle and bicycle models. In addition to different cyclist heights, reaching from a 6-year-old child to a 95%-male, also four pedal positions were considered. By reconstruction of a real accident the defined simulation parameters could be validated in advance. The conducted accident kinematics analysis shows for a large portion of the constellations an increased head impact area, which can reach beyond the roof leading edge, as well as high average values for head impact velocity and angle. Based on the simulation data obtained for the different vehicle models, cyclist-specific test parameters for impactor tests have been derived, which have been further examined in the course of head and leg impact tests. In order to study the cyclist accident kinematics under real test conditions, different full scale tests with a Polar-II dummy positioned on a bicycle have been conducted. Overall, the tests showed a good correlation with the simulations and support the defined boundary test conditions. Typical accident scenarios and simulations reveal higher head impact locations, angles and velocities. An extended head impact area with modified test parameters will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users including cyclists. However, due to significantly differing impact kinematics and postures between the lower extremities of pedestrians and cyclists, these injuries cannot be addressed by the means of current test tools such as the flexible pedestrian legform impactor FlexPLI. Based on the findings obtained within the project as well as the existing pedestrian protection requirements a cyclist protection test procedure for use in legislation and consumer test programmes has been developed, whose requirements have been transferred into a corresponding test specification. This specification provides common head test boundary conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, whereby the existing requirements are modified and two parallel test procedures are avoided.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection based on developments by the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) have been introduced in world-wide regulations and consumer test programmes, with considerable harmonization between these programmes. Nevertheless, latest accident investigations reveal a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads running the risk of not meeting the European Union- goal of halving the number of road fatalities by the year 2020. The branch of external road user safety within the EC-funded research project SENIORS under the HORIZON 2020 framework programme focuses on investigating the benefit of modifications to pedestrian test and assessment procedures and their impactors for vulnerable road users with focus on the elderly. Injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists derived from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) show a trend of AIS 2+ and AIS 3+ injuries getting more relevant for the thorax region in crashes with newer cars (Wisch et al., 2017), while maintaining the relevance for head and lower extremities. Several crash databases from Europe such as GIDAS and the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition (STRADA) also show that head, thorax and lower extremities are the key affected body regions not only for the average population but in particular for the elderly. Therefore, the SENIORS project is focusing on an improvement of currently available impactors and procedures in terms of biofidelity and injury assessment ability towards a better protection of the affected body regions, incorporating previous results from FP 6 project APROSYS and subsequent studies carried out by BASt. The paper describes the overall methodology to develop revised FE impactor models. Matched human body model and impactor simulations against generic test rigs provide transfer functions that will be used for the derivation of impactor criteria from human injury risk functions for the affected body regions. In a later step, the refined impactors will be validated by simulations against actual vehicle front-ends. Prototyping and adaptation of test and assessment procedures as well as an impact assessment will conclude the work of the project at the final stage. The work will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users focusing on the elderly. The use of advanced human body models to develop applicable assessment criteria for the revised impactors is intended to cope with the paucity of actual biomechanical data focusing on elderly pedestrians. In order to achieve optimized results in the future, the improved test methods need to be implemented within an integrated approach, combining active with passive safety measures. In order to address the developments in road accidents and injury patterns of vulnerable road users, established test and assessment procedures need to be continuously verified and, where needed, to be revised. The demographic change as well as changes in the vehicle fleet, leading to a variation of accident scenarios, injury frequencies and injury patterns of vulnerable road users are addressed by the work provided by the SENIORS project, introducing updated impactors for pedestrian test and assessment procedures.