Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (74) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Bewertung (74) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (74) (entfernen)
Im Rahmen seiner Tätigkeit hat sich der Arbeitskreis "Unterhaltungs- und Betriebsdienst" der Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen in den letzten Jahren wieder verstärkt dem Thema der von Dritten verursachten Unfälle mit Beteiligung des Unterhaltungs- und Betriebsdienstes auf Autobahnen gewidmet. Mit Hilfe der Erkenntnisse aus früheren Untersuchungen und der Auswertung von neueren Unfalldaten aus einer schweizerischen und einigen deutschen Straßenbauverwaltungen sollten vermutete Tendenzen überprüft und vorhandene Entwicklungen aufgezeigt werden. Eine Zunahme von Unfällen mit Personenschaden in den letzten Jahren war nicht zu erkennen, eher eine Stagnation der Unfallzahlen trotz steigendem Verkehrsaufkommens. Eine Betrachtung des individuellen Todesfallrisikos des Straßenbetriebsdienstpersonals, welches um ein Vielfaches größer ist als das anderer Berufsgruppen oder das der Verkehrsteilnehmer, zeigt allerdings die grundlegende Bedeutung der Problematik. In den Auswertungen lassen sich eine Reihe von häufig auftretenden Unfallmustern sowie einige Zusammenhänge mit dem Verkehrsgeschehen erkennen und daraus folgenden Ansätze zur Unfallvermeidung ableiten. Zukünftig sollen mit den Ergebnissen eine Sensibilisierung der Öffentlichkeit für die Gefährdung des Straßenbetriebspersonals erreicht und in weiteren Untersuchungen Möglichkeiten für eine Verbesserung der Absicherung von Arbeitsstellen erarbeitet werden.
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection based on developments by the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) have been introduced in world-wide regulations and consumer test programmes, with considerable harmonization between these programmes. Nevertheless, latest accident investigations reveal a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads running the risk of not meeting the European Union- goal of halving the number of road fatalities by the year 2020. The branch of external road user safety within the EC-funded research project SENIORS under the HORIZON 2020 framework programme focuses on investigating the benefit of modifications to pedestrian test and assessment procedures and their impactors for vulnerable road users with focus on the elderly. Injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists derived from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) show a trend of AIS 2+ and AIS 3+ injuries getting more relevant for the thorax region in crashes with newer cars (Wisch et al., 2017), while maintaining the relevance for head and lower extremities. Several crash databases from Europe such as GIDAS and the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition (STRADA) also show that head, thorax and lower extremities are the key affected body regions not only for the average population but in particular for the elderly. Therefore, the SENIORS project is focusing on an improvement of currently available impactors and procedures in terms of biofidelity and injury assessment ability towards a better protection of the affected body regions, incorporating previous results from FP 6 project APROSYS and subsequent studies carried out by BASt. The paper describes the overall methodology to develop revised FE impactor models. Matched human body model and impactor simulations against generic test rigs provide transfer functions that will be used for the derivation of impactor criteria from human injury risk functions for the affected body regions. In a later step, the refined impactors will be validated by simulations against actual vehicle front-ends. Prototyping and adaptation of test and assessment procedures as well as an impact assessment will conclude the work of the project at the final stage. The work will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users focusing on the elderly. The use of advanced human body models to develop applicable assessment criteria for the revised impactors is intended to cope with the paucity of actual biomechanical data focusing on elderly pedestrians. In order to achieve optimized results in the future, the improved test methods need to be implemented within an integrated approach, combining active with passive safety measures. In order to address the developments in road accidents and injury patterns of vulnerable road users, established test and assessment procedures need to be continuously verified and, where needed, to be revised. The demographic change as well as changes in the vehicle fleet, leading to a variation of accident scenarios, injury frequencies and injury patterns of vulnerable road users are addressed by the work provided by the SENIORS project, introducing updated impactors for pedestrian test and assessment procedures.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
A flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) with biofidelic characteristics is aimed to be implemented within global legislation on pedestrian protection. Therefore, it is being evaluated by a technical evaluation group (Flex-TEG) of GRSP with respect to its biofidelity, robustness, durability, usability and protection level (Zander, 2008). Previous studies at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and other laboratories already showed good progress concerning the general development, but also the need for further improvement and further research in various areas. An overview is provided of the different levels of development and all kinds of evaluation activities of the Flex-TEG, starting with the Polar II full scale pedestrian dummy as its origin and ending up with the latest legform impactor built level GTR that is expected to be finalized by the end of the year 2009. Using the latest built levels as a basis, gaps are revealed that should be closed by future developments, like the usage of an upper body mass (UBM), the validation of the femur loads, injury risk functions for the cruciate knee ligaments and an appropriate certification method. A recent study on an additional upper body mass being applied for the first time to the Flex-GT is used as means of validation of recently proposed modified impact conditions. Therefore, two test series on a modern vehicle front using an impactor with and without upper body mass are compared. A test series with the Flex-GTR will be used to study both the comparability of the impact behavior of the GT and GTR built level as well as the consistency of test results. Recommendations for implementation within legislation on pedestrian protection are made.
A flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been evaluated by a Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG) of the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN-ECE). It will be implemented within phase 2 of the global technical regulation (GTR 9) as well as within a new ECE regulation on pedestrian safety as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents (UN-ECE 2010-1, 2010-2 and 2010-3). Due to its biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia section, the FlexPLI is found to having an improved knee and tibia injury assessment ability when being compared to the current legislative test tool, the lower legform impactor developed by the Pedestrian Safety Working Group of the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC WG 17). However, due to a lack of biofidelity in terms of kinematics and loadings in the femur part of the FlexPLI, an appropriate assessment of femur injuries is still outstanding. The study described in this paper is aimed to close this gap. Impactor tests with the FlexPLI at different impact heights on three vehicle frontends with Sedan, SUV and FFV shape are performed and compared to tests with a modified FlexPLI with upper body mass. Full scale validation tests using a modified crash test dummy with attached FlexPLI that are carried out for the first time prove the more humanlike responses of the femur section with applied upper body mass. Apart from that they also show that the impact conditions described in the current technical provisions for tests with the FlexPLI don"t necessarily compensate the missing torso mass in terms of knee and tibia loadings either. Therefore it can be concluded that an applied upper body mass will contribute to a more biofidelic overall behavior of the legform and subsequently an improved injury assessment ability of all lower extremity injuries addressed by the FlexPLI. Nevertheless, the validity of the original as well as the modified legform for tests against vehicles with extraordinary high bumpers as well as flat front vehicles still needs to be evaluated in detail. A first clue is given by the application of an additional accelerometer to the legform.
Die Wirksamkeit der von Winkler, Jacobshagen und Nickel (1988) nach 36 Monaten Bewährungszeitraum untersuchten Kursmodelle für alkoholauffällige Kraftfahrer (IFT, IRAK, LEER) wurde nach einer Beobachtungszeit von 60 Monaten bei 1.667 Kursteilnehmern (Experimentalgruppe) erneut analysiert. 1.467 bei der medizinisch-psychologischen Untersuchung als "geeignet" und damit als gering rückfallgefährdet beurteilte Personen dienten als Kontrollgruppe. Auch nach dieser Zeit sind die Bewährungsdaten der Kursteilnehmer insgesamt signifikant besser als die der mit einem geringeren Rückfallrisiko behafteten Kontrollgruppenmitglieder. 21,6 % der Kursteilnehmer wurden erneut einschlägig auffällig, die Kontrollgruppenmitglieder jedoch zu 26,4 %. Die Kursmodelle unterscheiden sich in ihrer Wirksamkeit weiterhin nicht signifikant voneinander. Die nach einer Beobachtungszeit von drei Jahren gefundenen Rückfallprädikatoren erweisen sich auch bei einer Beobachtungszeit von fünf Jahren als valide. Insgesamt bestätigen die Ergebnisse das Institut der Nachschulung als wirksame Komponente des Fahrerlaubniswesens der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
Die Berücksichtigung privater Nutzen und Kosten bei der Bewertung von Verkehrssicherheitsmaßnahmen
(1988)
In der Untersuchung wird eine Verbindung zwischen der Theorie der öffentlichen Güter und der Praxis der Bewertung von Verkehrssicherheitsmaßnahmen hergestellt. Die Arbeit besteht aus zwei Teilen. Im ersten Teil wird aus der Theorie der öffentlichen Güter und der Theorie der Mischgüter ein Bewertungsverfahren abgeleitet. Im zweiten Teil wird an vier Beispielen die Anwendbarkeit und Praktikabilität des Verwertungsverfahrens untersucht. Bei den Beispielen handelt es sich um den Sicherheitsgurt, das Autonotfunk-System, den Kinder-Verkehrs-Club sowie Verkehrsberuhigungsmaßnahmen.
Ziel des Projektes war die Untersuchung der fahrdynamischen Besonderheiten der stationären, besonders jedoch der instationären Kurvenfahrt (Kurvenbremsung) von einspurigen Kraftfahrzeugen. Hierbei waren die Bewertung von Bremswirkung und Fahrstabilität unterschiedlicher Bremssysteme (Standardbremse, Kombibremse, ABV-Systeme) bei Kurvenbremsung sowie die Quantifizierung fahrer-, fahrzeug-, und fahrbahnseitiger Einflussparameter von besonderer Bedeutung. Hierzu werden zunächst die physikalischen und fahrdynamischen Grundlagen erarbeitet und der theoretische Ablauf der Kurvenbremsung betrachtet. Es folgte die experimentelle Erfassung des Kurvenbremsverhaltens im Straßenfahrversuch unter Verwendung der unterschiedlichen Bremssysteme und der Variation aller relevanter Parameter. Anschließend erfolgte die rechnergestützte Auswertung der experimentellen Ergebnisse sowie die Bewertung der unterschiedlichen Bremssysteme und Einflussgrößen. Als wichtigste Ergebnisse der Untersuchung können folgende Punkte gelten: - Alle untersuchten Bremssysteme können hinsichtlich des querdynamischen Verhaltens (Kurshaltung, Fahrstabilität) nicht befriedigen. - Effiziente Abbremsung in Kurvenfahrt mit ausreichender Bremssicherheit ist mit einer ABV-geregelten Kombibremsanlage zu erreichen unter der Voraussetzung, dass die ABV-Regelung nicht aktiviert wird, sondern das ABV-System lediglich als Überbremsungsschutz fungiert. - Die herkömmliche ungeregelte Standardbremse birgt mit zunehmender Querbeschleunigung eskalierende Sturzrisiken. Beim derzeitigen Stand der Technik lassen ABV-Systeme eine ausreichend fahr- und kursstabile Kurvenbremsung mit befriedigender Verzögerung zu, wenn nahe an der Regelungsschwelle gebremst wird. Wegen des hierbei dominierenden Einflusses des Vorderrades ist die Verbindung eines auf beide Räder wirkenden ABV-Systems mit einer lastabhängigen Kombibremse und voreilend überbremstem Hinterrad zu empfehlen.
The use of proper child restraint systems (CRS) is mandatory for children travelling in cars in most countries of the world. The analysis of the quantity of restrained children shows that more than 90% of the children in Germany are restrained. Looking at the quality of the protection, a large discrepancy between restrained and well protected children can be seen. Two out of three children in Germany are not properly restrained. In addition, considerable difference exists with respect to the technical performance of CRS. For that reason investigations and optimisations on two different topics are necessary: The technical improvement of CRS and the ease of use of CRS. Consideration of the knowledge gained by the comparison of different CRS in crash tests would lead to some improvements of the CRS. But improvement of child safety is not only a technical issue. People should use CRS in the correct way. Misuse and incorrect handling could lead to less safety than correct usage of a poor CRS. For that reason new technical issues are necessary to improve the child safety AND the ease of use. Only the combination of both parts can significantly increase child safety. For the assessment of the safety level of common CRS, frontal and lateral sled tests simulating different severity levels were conducted comparing pairs of CRS which were felt to be good and CRS which were felt to be poor. The safety of some CRS is currently at a high level. All well known products were not damaged in the performed tests. The performance of non-branded CRS was mostly worse than that of the well known products. Although the branded child restraint systems already show a high safety level it is still possible to further improve their technical performance as demonstrated with a baby shell and a harness type CRS.
At the 2005 ESV conference, the International Harmonisation of Research Activities (IHRA) side impact working group proposed a 4 part draft test procedure, to form the basis of harmonisation of regulation world-wide and to help advances in car occupant protection. This paper presents the work performed by a European Commission 6th framework project, called APROSYS, an further development and evaluation of the proposed procedure from a European perspective. The 4 parts of the proposed procedure are: - A Mobile Deformable Barrier test; - An oblique Pole side impact test; - Interior headform tests; - Side Out of Position (OOP) tests. Full scale test and modelling work to develop the Advanced European Mobile Deformable Barrier (AE-MDB) further is described, resulting in a recommendation to revise the barrier face to include a bumper beam element. An evaluation of oblique and perpendicular pole tests was made from tests and numerical simulations using ES-2 and WorldSID 50th percentile dummies. It was concluded that an oblique pole test is feasible but that a perpendicular test would be preferable for Europe. The interior headform test protocol was evaluated to assess its repeatability and reproducibility and to solve issues such as the head impact angle and limitation zones. Recommendations for updates to the test protocol are made. Out-of-position (OOP) tests applicable for the European situation were performed, which included additional tests with Child Restraint Systems (CRS) which use is mandatory in Europe. It was concluded that the proposed IHRA OOP tests do cover the worst case situations, but the current test protocol is not ready for regulatory use.