Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (106) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Anfahrversuch (37)
- Safety (35)
- Impact test (veh) (34)
- Sicherheit (34)
- Bewertung (30)
- Conference (29)
- Evaluation (assessment) (29)
- Konferenz (29)
- Fahrzeug (26)
- Test method (25)
- Vehicle (25)
- Prüfverfahren (24)
- Dummy (20)
- Fußgänger (20)
- Pedestrian (20)
- Accident (19)
- Unfall (19)
- Anthropometric dummy (18)
- Verletzung (18)
- Deutschland (17)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (17)
- Germany (17)
- Injury (17)
- Collision (16)
- Head on collision (16)
- Simulation (16)
- Kompatibilität (15)
- Compatibility (14)
- Driver assistance system (14)
- Versuch (14)
- Zusammenstoß (14)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (13)
- Test (13)
- Analyse (math) (12)
- Analysis (math) (12)
- Biomechanics (11)
- Biomechanik (11)
- Europa (11)
- Europe (11)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (10)
- injury) (10)
- Car (9)
- Child (9)
- Head (9)
- Kind (9)
- Kopf (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (9)
- Severity (accid, injury) (9)
- Side impact (9)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (9)
- Verletzung) (9)
- Bemessung (8)
- Cyclist (8)
- Design (overall design) (8)
- Forschungsarbeit (8)
- Method (8)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (8)
- Research project (8)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (8)
- Severity (accid (8)
- Vehicle regulations (8)
- Verfahren (8)
- Automatic (7)
- Automatisch (7)
- Driver (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (7)
- Improvement (7)
- Insasse (7)
- Interior (veh) (7)
- Passive safety system (7)
- Standardisierung (7)
- Vehicle occupant (7)
- Verbesserung (7)
- Active safety system (6)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (6)
- Brustkorb (6)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (6)
- Gesetzgebung (6)
- Knee (human) (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Perception (6)
- Pkw (6)
- Schlag (6)
- Shock (6)
- Thorax (6)
- Unfallverhütung (6)
- Wahrnehmung (6)
- Accident prevention (5)
- Autonomes Fahren (5)
- Autonomous driving (5)
- Behaviour (5)
- Braking (5)
- Bremsung (5)
- Cost benefit analysis (5)
- Datenbank (5)
- Deformation (5)
- Development (5)
- Driver information (5)
- Entwicklung (5)
- Fahrerinformation (5)
- Fatality (5)
- Forschungsbericht (5)
- Impact test (5)
- Lkw (5)
- Lorry (5)
- Research report (5)
- Standardization (5)
- Tödlicher Unfall (5)
- Verhalten (5)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (5)
- Alte Leute (4)
- Aufprallschlitten (4)
- Database (4)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (4)
- Fahrstabilität (4)
- Impact sled (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Measurement (4)
- Messung (4)
- Modification (4)
- Motorcycle (4)
- Motorrad (4)
- Prevention (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Statistics (4)
- Statistik (4)
- Technologie (4)
- Technology (4)
- Vehicle handling (4)
- Verformung (4)
- Airbag (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Belastung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Body (car) (3)
- Collision avoidance system (3)
- Communication (3)
- EU (3)
- Efficiency (3)
- Empfindlichkeit (3)
- Ergonomics (3)
- Error (3)
- Fahrzeugführung (3)
- Fahrzeugsitz (3)
- Fehler (3)
- Front (3)
- Gewicht (3)
- Halswirbel (3)
- Human body (3)
- Intelligent transport system (3)
- Karosserie (3)
- Kommunikation (3)
- Kraftfahrzeug (3)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (3)
- Load (3)
- Mathematical model (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Official approval (3)
- Old people (3)
- Reaction (human) (3)
- Reaktionsverhalten (3)
- Rechenmodell (3)
- Risiko (3)
- Risk (3)
- Safety belt (3)
- Seat (veh) (3)
- Sensitivity (3)
- Sensor (3)
- Sicherheitsgurt (3)
- Steering (process) (3)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (3)
- Use (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Visual display (3)
- Weight (3)
- Wirbelsäule (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Ablenkung (psychol) (2)
- Anthropmetric dummy (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Antikollisionssystem (2)
- Auffahrunfall (2)
- Ausrüstung (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Bildschirm (2)
- Cause (2)
- Cervical vertebrae (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Decrease (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Distraction (2)
- Driving (veh) (2)
- Emission (2)
- Equipment (2)
- Forecast (2)
- Geschwindigkeit (2)
- Haftung (jur) (2)
- Headlamp (2)
- Hospital (2)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (2)
- Interface (2)
- International (2)
- Kamera (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Krankenhaus (2)
- Kunststoff (2)
- Leuchtdichte (2)
- Liability (2)
- Luminance (2)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (2)
- Messgerät (2)
- Nacht (2)
- Night (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- On the spot accident investigation (2)
- Organisation (2)
- Plastic material (2)
- Prognose (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Rear end collision (2)
- Rear view mirror (2)
- Rückspiegel (2)
- Scheinwerfer (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Severity (acid (2)
- Sichtbarkeit (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Speed (2)
- Spinal column (2)
- Stress (psychol) (2)
- Traffic (2)
- Traffic regulations (2)
- Transport infrastructure (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Unterfahrschutz (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (2)
- Verhütung (2)
- Verkehr (2)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (2)
- Verminderung (2)
- Sichtbarkeit (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Windschutzscheibe (2)
- Windscreen (veh) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- (menschl) (1)
- Ablenkung (1)
- Accessibility (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Accident reconstruction (1)
- Achslast (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Angle (1)
- Ankündigung (1)
- Anordnung (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Apparatus (measuring) (1)
- Articulated vehicle (1)
- Attention (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Augenbewegungen (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Axle load (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Baumusterzulassung (1)
- Baustelle (1)
- Beanspruchung (1)
- Bein (1)
- Benchmark (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Brake light (1)
- Bremslicht (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Bus (1)
- Cadaver (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Camera (1)
- Car park (1)
- Carbon dioxide (1)
- Cervical vertebrae; Conference; Evaluation (assessment); Injury; Spinal column; Test (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Compression (1)
- Congestion (traffic) (1)
- Construction (1)
- Construction site (1)
- Contact (tyre road) (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Datenerfassung (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Decke (Straße) (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Detection response task (1)
- Deterioration (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Dimension (1)
- Disstraction (1)
- Driver (veh) (1)
- Driver information system (1)
- Driving aptitude (1)
- Durability (1)
- Dynamic penetration test (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- EU directive (1)
- EU-Richtlinie (1)
- Echtzeit (1)
- Economic efficiency (1)
- Economics of transport (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emergency (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Ergonomie (1)
- Ersatzfahraufgabe (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Eye movement (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahnmarkierung (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrerinformationssystem (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrsimulator (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrtauglichkeit (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Failure (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- Foot (not a measure) (1)
- Form (1)
- Frau (1)
- Freight transport (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Frequenz (1)
- Fuel consumption (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Fuß (1)
- Gelenkfahrzeug (1)
- Grenzfläche (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Güterverkehr (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Herstellung (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Impact study (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- Increase (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kognitive Aufgabenanforderung (1)
- Kohlendioxid (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Kontrolle (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kraftstoffverbrauch (1)
- Laborexperiment (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Layout (1)
- Leichnam (1)
- Limit (1)
- Location (1)
- Lärm (1)
- Man-machine interface (1)
- Manufacture (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Materialveränderung (allg) (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nasse Straße (1)
- Noise (1)
- Notfall (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Oberfläche (1)
- Oberflächentextur (1)
- Optimum (1)
- Optische Anzeige (1)
- Organization (1)
- Organization (association) (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Parkfläche (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Productivity (1)
- Properties (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Radio (1)
- Rammsondierung (1)
- Real time (1)
- Rear (1)
- Reconstruction (accid) (1)
- Reflectorized material (1)
- Reflexstoffe (1)
- Reifen (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road marking (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rundfunk (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Safety glass (1)
- Schallpegel (1)
- Schnittstelle (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Sicherheitsglas (1)
- Side (1)
- Simulator (driving) (1)
- Size and weight regulations (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Sound level (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Soziologie (1)
- Spain (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Specification (standard ) (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Spectrum (1)
- Spektrum (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- Standard (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Stress (1)
- Stress (psycho) (1)
- Surface (1)
- Surface texture (1)
- Surfacing (1)
- Surrogate driving set-up (1)
- Surveillance (1)
- Tactile perception (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Taktiles Signal (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Tracking task (1)
- Trackingaufgabe (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic regulation (1)
- Train (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- Tyre (1)
- USA (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle regulation (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Vergrößerung (1)
- Verkehrsstauung (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Verkehrswirtschaft (1)
- Vibration (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Warning (1)
- Weather (1)
- Wet road (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Wirtschaftlichkeit (1)
- Witterung (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zugänglichkeit (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zulassung (tech) (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
The term test procedure refers to a method that describes how a system has to be tested to identify and assess specific behavior or properties by experiments. This also includes the specification of required tools, equipment, boundary conditions, and evaluation methods. Test procedures are an essential tool to check whether desired product properties are present, which of course also applies to the development of driver assistance systems. In addition to development and release testing that mainly is performed by the vehicle or system manufacturer, there are tests with the purpose of an independent product testing that are conducted by external test organizations. These tests are needed for vehicle type approval (for admission to a specific market), in the context of applying the standard for functional safety (in both cases mainly executed by technical services (being accredited as certification laboratory)) or for customer information purposes (by a test institute for consumer protection). The focus of this chapter is these "external" test methods. After a taxonomy of test procedures, the differences between legislation (type approval) and consumer testing are highlighted. Typical tests and the associated test setup, tools, and assessment criteria are discussed, and an outlook toward testing in the near and mid-future is given.
The "Autonomous driving on the roads of the future: Villa Ladenburg Project" by the Daimler und Benz-Stiftung looks at degrees of automation that will only become technically feasible in the distant future. The treatment of the legal questions in the present chapter therefore draws heavily on the description of the use cases, which begin to provide a concrete basis for evaluating individual issues. Uncertainties in predicting future technical developments can be expected and will have a commensurate impact on the assumptions and conclusions of this chapter. The resulting uncertainty is nevertheless unavoidable if one wants to press ahead with important interrelated issues. This chapter is therefore intended as a contribution to the debate on societal aspects of automated driving from a legal perspective and not as a legalistic evaluation of the subject. The consideration will largely focus on the situation within the context of current German law. The legal views expressed are those of the author and are based on nine years of experience in the field of driver assistance system research. In terms of the underlying conception presented here, the societal dimension of autonomous vehicles addressed in the present project goes well beyond the adjustments to the legal framework currently being called for in Germany. The following will examine the question of "societal acceptance" in the context of the legal questions raised by autonomous vehicles. This line of investigation is not immediately obvious and covers only a segment of the more thoroughgoing focus of the project.
The term driver assistance systems in the chapter title shall be understood to include vehicle automation. This chapter starts with a homogeneous and consistent classification and nomenclature of all kinds of driver assistance systems known and under discussion today (including vehicle automation). It thereby builds upon familiar classification schemes by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and the standardization body SAE international. Detailed evaluation of the German legal situation for driver assistance systems and vehicle automation is provided in the following Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, an overview is given on the legal system in the US to reveal aspects relevant for vehicle automation. This is intended as initial information for those not acquainted to the US legal system which has been the first to regulate automation in several federal states. Finally, in Sect. 4, the current rating scheme of the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) is presented in comparison to legal instruments. The model of a consumer protection based approach proves to be a flexible instrument with great advantages in promoting new technologies. Technical vehicle regulations on the other hand rule minimum requirements. Both approaches are needed to achieve maximum vehicle safety.
Automated driving will provide many kinds of benefits - some direct and some indirect. The benefits originate at the individual level, from changes in the behaviour of drivers and travellers with regard to driving and mobility, ending up with benefits at the social level via changes in the whole transport system and society, where many of the current planning and operations paradigms are likely to be transformed by automated driving. There may also be disbenefits, particularly at a social level, for example in intensity of travel which could result in additional congestion and increased use of natural resources. There may also be unintended consequences. For example, we do not know the impacts on public transport: driverless vehicles could provide a means to a lower cost service provision, but the availability of automated cars could lead to more car travel at the expense of collective transport.
Motorcycling is a fascinating kind of transportation. While the riders' direct exposure to the environment and the unique driving dynamics are essential to this fascination, they both cause a risk potential which is several times higher than when driving a car. This chapter gives a detailed introduction to the fundamentals of motorcycle dynamics and shows how its peculiarities and limitations place high demands on the layout of dynamics control systems, especially when cornering. The basic principles of dynamic stabilization and directional control are addressed along with four characteristic modes of instability (capsize, wobble, weave, and kickback). Special attention is given to the challenges of braking (brake force distribution, dynamic over-braking, kinematic instability, and brake steer torque induced righting behavior). It is explained how these challenges are addressed by state-of-the-art brake, traction, and suspension control systems in terms of system layout and principles of function. It is illustrated how the integration of additional sensors " essentially roll angle assessment " enhances the cornering performance in all three categories, fostering a trend to higher system integration levels. An outlook on potential future control systems shows exemplarily how the undesired righting behavior when braking in curves can be controlled, e.g., by means of a so-called brake steer torque avoidance mechanism (BSTAM), forming the basis for predictive brake assist (PBA) or even autonomous emergency braking (AEB). Finally, the very limited potential of brake and chassis control to stabilize yaw and roll motion during unbraked cornering accidents is regarded, closing with a promising glance at roll stabilization through a pair of gimbaled gyroscopes.
In line with the new definition introduced by the European Commission (EC), the number of seriously injured road casualties in Germany for 2014 is assessed in this study. The number of MAIS3+ casualties is estimated by two different methodological approaches. The first approach is based on data from the German Inâ€Depth Accident Study (GIDAS), which is closely related to the German Road Traffic Accident Statistics. The second approach is based on data from the German TraumaRegister DGU-® (TRâ€DGU), which includes many more hospitals but not all MAIS3+ injuries.
Established in 1997, the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) provides consumers with a safety performance assessment for the majority of the most popular cars in Europe. Thanks to its rigorous crash tests, Euro NCAP has rapidly become an important driver safety improvement to new cars. After ten years of rating vehicles, Euro NCAP felt that a change was necessary to stay in tune with rapidly emerging driver assistance and crash avoidance systems and to respond to shifting priorities in road safety. A new overall rating system was introduced that combines the most important aspects of vehicle safety under a single star rating. The overall rating system has allowed Euro NCAP to continue to push for better fitment and higher performance for vehicles sold on the European market. In the coming years, the safety rating is expected to play an important role in the support of the roll-out of highly automated vehicles.
Estimation of the effects of new emission standards on motorcycle emissions by means of modeling
(2016)
Road traffic is, in addition to the energy sector and the industry, one main source of air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions. Although most countries and manufacturers agreed to environmental regulations to reduce the pollutant emissions, particularly in urban areas with high traffic density, the impact of road traffic emissions on the environment and human health has been growing in importance steadily. Due to stricter emission standards and the binding use of emission-reducing systems (e.g. three-way catalyst) hydrocarbon emissions from passenger cars have been reduced significantly since the last two decades. Unlike to passenger cars the emissions standards of powered two-wheelers have not been adjusted since 2006 although their share of hydrocarbon emissions to the total amount of hydrocarbon emissions of road traffic is estimated to be disproportionately high. Due to the new regulation (EU) No. 168/2013 powered two-wheelers have to fulfill new emission standards from 2016 (Euro 4) and 2020 (Euro 5) onwards. Besides new limits for the tailpipe emissions the evaporative emissions are regulated separately for the first time, as they make up a high proportion to the total hydrocarbon emissions in this vehicle class. In this context, the calculation and forecast of road traffic emissions is an important tool to verify compliance of climate targets and to assess the reduction potential of emission-reducing systems. For that purpose the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) uses the emission- and calculation tool TREMOD (Transport Emission Model) which provides baseline data and calculated results for pollutants in almost every differentiation e.g. vehicle category, traffic situation and road type. Moreover, estimations of future emission trends, stock information and mileage distribution can be made. The main objective is to illustrate the impact of the upcoming emission standards Euro 4 and Euro 5 on the operational hydrocarbon emissions of powered two-wheelers based on statistical estimations. The significant aspect is to generate scenarios to show the reduction potential of hydrocarbon emissions of powered two-wheelers, differentiated into motorcycles and small motorcycles, in relation to the total share of hydrocarbon emissions in this vehicle class and to the total hydrocarbon emissions from road traffic. As a part of their research, the authors can make initial statements about the possible effect of the new emission standards of regulation (EU) No. 168/2013 by means of modeling with TREMOD.
There is considerable evidence for the negative effects of driver distraction on road safety. In many experimental studies, drivers have been primarily viewed as passive receivers of distraction. Thus, there is a lack of research on the mediating role of their self-regulatory behavior. The aim of the current study was to compare drivers' performance when engaged in a system-paced secondary task with a self-paced version of this task and how both differed from baseline driving performance without distraction. Thirty-nine participants drove in a simulator while performing a secondary visual"manual task. One group of drivers had to work on this task in predefined situations under time pressure, whereas the other group was free to decide when to work on the secondary task (self-regulation group). Drivers' performance (e.g., lateral and longitudinal control, brake reaction times) was also compared with a baseline condition without any secondary task. For the system-paced secondary task, distraction was associated with high decrements in driving performance (especially in keeping the lateral position). No effects were found for the number of collisions, probably because of the lower driving speeds while distracted (compensatory behavior). For the self-regulation group, only small impairments in driving performance were found. Drivers engaged less in the secondary task during foreseeable demanding or critical driving situations. Overall, drivers in the self-regulation group were able to anticipate the demands of different traffic situations and to adapt their engagement in the secondary task, so that only small impairments in driving performance occurred. Because in real traffic drivers are mostly free to decide when to engage in secondary tasks, it can be concluded that self-regulation should be considered in driver distraction research to ensure ecological validity.
Except for corrective steering functions automatic steering is up to now only allowed at speeds up to 10 km/h according to UN Regulation No. 79. Progress in automotive engineering with regard to driver assistance systems and automation of driving tasks is that far that it would be technically feasible to realise automatically commanded steering functions also at higher vehicle speeds. Besides improvements in terms of comfort these automated systems are expected to contribute to road traffic safety as well. However, this safety potential will only be exhausted if automated steering systems are properly designed. Especially possible new risks due to automated steering have to be addressed and reduced to a minimum. For these reasons work is currently ongoing on UNECE level with the aim to amend the regulation dealing with provisions concerning the approval of steering equipment. It is the aim to revise requirements for automatically commanded steering functions (ACSF) so that they can be approved also for higher speeds if certain performance requirements are fulfilled. The paper at hand describes the derivation of reasonable system specifications from an analysis of relevant driving situations with an automated steering system. Needs are explained with regard to covering normal driving, sudden unexpected critical events, transition to manual driving, driver availability and manoeuvres to reach a state of minimal risk. These issues form the basis for the development of test procedures for automated steering to be implemented in international regulations. This holds for system functionalities like automatic lane keeping or automatic lane change as well as for addressing transition situations in which the system has to hand over steering to the driver or addressing emergency situations in which the system has to react instead of the driver.
One main objective of the EU-Project SENIORS is to provide improved methods to assess thoracic injury risk to elderly occupants. In contribution to this task paired simulations with a THOR dummy model and human body model will be used to develop improved thoracic injury risk functions. The simulation results can provide data for injury criteria development in chest loading conditions that are underrepresented in PMHS test data sets that currently proposed risk functions are based on. To support this approach a new simplified generic but representative sled test fixture and CAE model for testing and simulation were developed. The parameter definition and evaluation of this sled test fixture and model is presented in this paper. The justification and definition of requirements for this test set-up was based on experience from earlier studies. Simple test fixtures like the gold standard sled fixture are easy to build and also to model in CAE, but provide too severe belt-only loading. On the other hand a vehicle buck including production components like airbag and seat is more representative, but difficult to model and to be replicated at a different laboratory. Furthermore some components might not be available for physical tests at later stage. The basis of the SENIORS generic sled test set-up is the gold standard fixture with a cable seat back and foot rest. No knee restraint was used. The seat pan design was modified including a seat ramp. The three-point belt system had a generic adjustable load limiter. A pre-inflated driver airbag assembly was developed for the test fixture. Results of THOR test and simulations in different configurations will be presented. The configurations include different deceleration pulses. Further parameter variations are related to the restraint system including belt geometry and load limiter levels. Additionally different settings of the generic airbag were evaluated. The test set-up was evaluated and optimized in tests with the THOR-M dummy in different test configurations. Belt restraint parameters like D-ring position and load limiter setting were modified to provide moderate chest loading to the occupant. This resulted in dummy readings more representative of the loading in a contemporary vehicle than most available PMHS sled tests reported in the literature. However, to achieve a loading configuration that exposes the occupant to even less severe loading comparable to modern vehicle restraints it might be necessary to further modify the test set-up. The new generic sled test set-up and a corresponding CAE model were developed and applied in tests and simulations with THOR. Within the SENIORS project with this test set-up also volunteer and PMHS as well as HBM simulations are performed, which will be reported in other publications. The test environment can contribute in future studies to the assessment of existing and new frontal impact dummies as well as dummy improvements and related instrumentation. The test set-up and model could also serve as a new standard test environment for PMHS and volunteer tests as well as HBM simulations.
The levels of continuous vehicle automation have become common knowledge. They facilitate overall understanding of the issue. Yet, continuous vehicle automation described therein does not cover "automated driving" as a whole: Functions intervening temporarily in accident-prone situations can obviously not be classified by means of continuous levels. Continuous automation describes the shift in workload from purely human driven vehicles to full automation. Duties of the driver are assigned to the machine as automation levels rise. Emergency braking, e.g., is obviously discontinuous and intensive automation. It cannot be classified under this regime. The resulting absence of visibility of these important functions cannot satisfy " especially in the light of effect they take on traffic safety. Therefore, in order to reach a full picture of vehicle automation, a comprehensive approach is proposed that can map out different characteristics as "Principle of Operation" at top level. On this basis informing and warning functions as well as functions intervening only temporarily in near-accident situations can be described. To reach a complete picture, levels for the discontinuous, temporarily intervening functions are proposed " meant to be the counterpart of the continuous levels already in place. This results in a detailed and independent classification for accident-prone situations. This finally provides for the visibility these important functions deserve.
PROSPECT (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) is a collaborative research project involving most of the relevant partners from the automotive industry (including important active safety vehicle manufacturers and tier-1 suppliers) as well as academia and independent test labs, funded by the European Commission in the Horizon 2020 research program. PROSPECT's primary goal is the development of novel active safety functions, to be finally demonstrated to the public in three prototype vehicles. A sound benefit assessment of the prototype vehicle's functionality requires a broad testing methodology which goes beyond what has currently been used. Since PROSPECT functions are developed to prevent accidents in intersections, a key aspect of the test methodology is the reproduction of natural driving styles on the test track with driving robots. For this task, data from a real driving study with subjects in a suburb of Munich, Germany was used. Further data from Barcelona will be available soon. The data suggests that intersection crossing can be broken down into five phases, two phases with straight deceleration / acceleration, one phase with constant radius and speed turning, and two phases where the bend is imitated or ended. In these latter phases, drivers mostly combine lateral and longitudinal accelerations and drive what is called a clothoid, a curve with curvature proportional to distance travelled, in order to change lateral acceleration smoothly rather than abrupt. The data suggests that the main parameter of the clothoid, the ratio distance travelled to curvature, is mostly constant during the intersections. This parameter together with decelerations and speeds allows the generation of synthetic robot program files for a reproduction of natural driving styles using robots, allowing a much greater reproducibility than what is possible with human test drivers. First tests show that in principle it is possible to use the driving robots for vehicle control in that manner; a challenge currently is the control performance of the robot system in terms of speed control, but it is anticipated that this problem will be solved soon. Further elements of the PROSPECT test methodology are a standard intersection marking to be implemented on the test track which allows the efficient testing of all PROSPECT test cases, standard mobile and light obstruction elements for quick reproduction of obstructions of view, and a concept for tests in realistic surroundings. First tests using the PROSPECT test methodology will be conducted over the summer 2017, and final tests of the prototype vehicles developed within PROSPECT will be conducted in early 2018
The UN Regulation No. 79 is going to be amended to allow automatically commanded steering functions (ACSF) at speeds above 10 km/h. Hence, requirements concerning the approval of automatically performed steering manoeuvres have to be set in order to allow safe use of automatic steering on public roads as well as improve overall road safety for the driver and the surroundings. By order of the German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI), BASt developed and verified physical test procedures for automatic steering to be implemented in UN Regulation No. 79. The usability of currently available test tools was examined. The paper at hand describes these test procedures and presents results from verification tests. The designated tests are divided in three sections: functionality tests, verifications for the transition of control and emergency tests. System functionality tests are auto matic lane keeping, automatic lane change and an automatic abort of an initiated lane change due to traffic. Those tests check if the vehicle remains in its lane (under normal operating conditions), is able to perform safe automatic lane change manoeuvres and if it considers other road users during its manoeuvres. Transition tests examine the vehicle's behaviour when the driver fails to monitor the system and in situations when the system has to hand over the steering control back to the driver. For instance these tests provoke driver-in-the-loop requests by approaching system boundary limitations, like missing lane markings, surpassing maximum lateral acceleration in a bend or even a major system failure. Even further the driver and his inputs are monitored and if the system detects that he is overriding system actions or contrary want to quit the driving task and unfastens the seat belt, it has to shut down and put the human back into manually control and the responsibility of driving. The last series of test consists of two emergency situations in which the system has to react to a time critical event: A hard decelerating vehicle and a stationary vehicle in front both with no lane change possibility for the ACSF vehicle. Some of the tests, especially the emergency manoeuvres, require special target vehicles and propulsion systems. Since no fully automatic steering vehicles are available, a current Mercedes E-Class with Mercedes' "drive pilot" system was used. It was shown that the vehicle is automatically able to brake to a full stop towards a static Euro NCAP target from partial-automatic driving at 90 km/h, that it could brake towards a rapidly decelerating lead vehicle when travelling at 70 km/h, that it was able during partially automatic driving to remain in its lane in normal operation conditions and to perform a automatic (driver initiated) lane change while surveilling the driver- activities.
Europe has benefited from a decreasing number of road traffic fatalities. However, the proportion of older road users increases steadily. In an ageing society, the SENIORS project aims to improve the safe mobility of older road users by determining appropriate requirements towards passive vehicle safety systems. Therefore, the characteristics of road traffic crashes involving the elderly people need to be understood. This paper focuses on car occupants and pedestrians or cyclists in crashes with modern passenger cars. Ten crash databases and four hospital statistics from Europe have been analysed to answer the questions on which body regions are most frequently and severely injured in the elderly, and specific injuries sustained by always comparing older (65 years and above) with midâ€aged road users (25â€64 years). It was found that the body region thorax is of particularly high importance for the older car occupant with injury severities of AIS2 or AIS3+, where as the lower extremities, head and the thorax need to be considered for older pedestrians and cyclists. Further, injury risk functions were provided. The hospital data analysis showed less difference between the age groups. The linkage between crash and hospital data could only be made on a general level as their inclusion criteria were quite different.
Accidents between right turning trucks and straight driving cyclists often show massive consequences. Accident severity in terms of seriously or fatally injured cyclists that are involved is much higher than in accidents of other traffic participants in other situations. It seems clear that adding additional mirrors will very likely not improve the situation. At ESV 2015, a methodology to derive test procedures and first test cases as well as requirements for a driver assist system to address blind spot accidents has been presented. However, it was unclear if and how testing of these cases is feasible, to what extent characteristics of different truck concepts (e.g. articulated vehicles, rigid vehicles) influence the test conduction and outcome, and what tolerances should be selected for the different variables. This work is important for the acceptance of a draft regulation in the UN working group on general safety. In the meantime, three test series using a single tractor vehicle, a tractor-semitrailer combination and a rigid vehicle have been conducted. The test tools (e.g. surrogate devices) have been refined. A fully crashable, commercially available bicycle dummy has been tested. If used correct, this dummy does follow a straight line quite precisely and it does not cause any damage to the truck under test in case of accidental impact. The dummy specifications are freely available. During testing, the different vehicle categories resulted in different trajectories being driven. Articulated vehicle combinations did first execute a turn into the opposite direction, and on the other hand, single tractor vehicles did behave comparable to passenger cars. A possible solution to take these behaviors into account is to require the vehicles to drive through a corridor that is narrow for a precise straight-driving phase and extends during the turn. Other investigated parameters are the dummy and vehicle speed tolerances. The results from this research make it possible to draft a regulation for a driver assistance system that helps to avoid blind spot accidents: test cases have been refined, their feasibility has been checked, and corridors for the vehicles and for important parameters (e.g. test speeds) have been set. The test procedure is applicable to all types of heavy goods vehicles. In combination with the accidentology (ESV 2015 paper), the work provides the basis for a regulation for such an assistance system.
Advancing active safety towards the protection of vulnerable road users: the PROSPECT project
(2017)
Accidents involving Vulnerable Road Users (VRU) are still a very significant issue for road safety. According to the World Health Organisation, pedestrian and cyclist deaths account for more than 25% of all road traffic deaths worldwide. Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems have the potential to improve safety for these VRU groups. The PROSPECT project (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) aims to significantly improve the effectiveness of active VRU safety systems compared to those currently on the market by expanding the scope of scenarios addressed by the systems and improving the overall system performance. The project pursues an integrated approach: Newest available accident data combined with naturalistic observations and HMI guidelines represent key inputs for the system specifications, which form the basis for the system development. For system development, two main aspects are considered: advanced sensor processing with situation analysis, and intervention strategies including braking and steering. All these concepts are implemented in several vehicle prototypes. Special emphasis is put on balancing system performance in critical scenarios and avoiding undesired system activations. For system validation, testing in realistic scenarios will be done. Results will allow the performance assessment of the developed concepts and a cost-benefit analysis. The findings within the PROSPECT project will contribute to the generation of state -of-the-art knowledge, technical innovations, assessment methodologies and tools for advancing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems towards the protection of VRUs. The introduction of a new generation safety system in the market will enhance VRU road safety in 2020-2025, contributing to the "Vision Zero" objective of no fatalities or serious injuries in road traffic set out in the Transport White Paper. Furthermore, the test methodologies and tools developed within the project shall be considered for the New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) future roadmaps, supporting the European Commission goal of halving the road toll in the 2011-2020 timeframe.
The presence and performance of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) has increased over last years. Systems available on the market address also conflicts with vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists. Within the European project PROSPECT (Horizon2020, funded by the EC) improved VRU ADAS systems are developed and tested. However, before determining systems" properties and starting testing, an up-to-date analysis of VRU crashes was needed in order to derive the most important Use Cases (detailed crash descriptions) the systems should address. Besides the identified Accident Scenarios (basic crash descriptions), this paper describes in short the method of deriving the Use Cases for car-to-cyclist crashes. Method Crashes involving one passenger car and one cyclist were investigated in several European crash databases looking for all injury severity levels (slight, severe and fatal). These data sources included European statistics from CARE, data on national level from Germany, Sweden and Hungary as well as detailed accident information from these three countries using GIDAS, the Volvo Cars Cyclist Accident database and Hungarian in-depth accident data, respectively. The most frequent accident scenarios were studied and Use Cases were derived considering the key aspects of these crash situations (e.g., view orientation of the cyclist and the car driver- manoeuvre intention) and thus, form an appropriate basis for the development of Test Scenarios. Results Latest information on car-to-cyclist crashes in Europe was compiled including details on the related crash configurations, driving directions, outcome in terms of injury severity, accident location, other environmental aspects and driver responsibilities. The majority of car-to-cyclist crashes occurred during daylight and in clear weather conditions. Car-to-cyclist crashes in which the vehicle was traveling straight and the cyclist is moving in line with the traffic were found to result in the greatest number of fatalities. Considering also slightly and seriously injured cyclists led to a different order of crash patterns according to the three considered European countries. Finally the paper introduced the Use Cases derived from the crash data analysis. A total of 29 Use Cases were derived considering the group of seriously or fatally injured cyclists and 35 Use Cases were derived considering the group of slightly, seriously or fatally injured cyclists. The highest ranked Use Case describes the collision between a car turning to the nearside and a cyclist riding on a bicycle lane against the usual driving direction. A unified European dataset on car-to-cyclist crash scenarios is not available as the data available in CARE is limited, hence national datasets had to be used for the study and further work will be required to extrapolate the results to a European level. Due to the large number of Use Cases, the paper shows only highest ranked ones.
A reduction of around 48% of all road fatalities was achieved in Europe in the past years including a reduced number of fatalities with an older age. However, among all road fatalities, the proportion of elderly is steadily increasing. In an ageing society, the European (Horizon2020) project SENIORS aims to improve the safe mobility of older road users, who have different transportation habits compared to other age groups. To increase their level of safe mobility by determining appropriate requirements for vehicle safety systems, the characteristics of current road traffic collisions involving the elderly and the injuries that they sustain need to be understood in detail. Hereby, the paper focuses on their traffic participation as pedestrian, cyclist or passenger car occupant. Following a literature review, several national and international crash databases and hospital statistics have been analysed to determine the body regions most frequently and severely injured, specific injuries sustained and types of crashes involved, always comparing older road users (65 years and more) with mid-aged road users (25-64 years). The most important crash scenarios were highlighted. The data sources included European statistics from CARE, data on national level from Germany, Sweden, Italy, United Kingdom and Spain as well as in-depth crash information from GIDAS (Germany), RAIDS (UK), CIREN and NASS-CDS (US). In addition, familiar hospital data from Germany (TraumaRegister DGU-®), Italy (Italian Register of Acute Traumas) and UK hospital statistics (TARN) were included in the study to gain further insight into specific injury patterns. Comprehensive data analyses were performed showing injury patterns of older road users in crashes. When comparing with mid-aged road users, all databases showed that the thorax body region is of particularly high importance for the older car occupant with injury severities of AIS 2 or AIS 3+, whereas the body regions lower extremities, head and thorax need to be considered for the older pedestrians and cyclists. Besides these comparisons, the most frequent and severe top 5 injuries were highlighted per road user group. Further, the most important crash configurations were identified and injury risk functions are provided per age group and road user group. Although several databases have been analysed, the picture on the road safety situation of older road users in Europe was not complete, as only Western European data was available. The linkage between crash data and hospital data could only be made on a general level as their inclusion criteria were quite different.
Supported by field accident data and monitoring results of European Regulation (EC) No. 78/2009, recent plans of the European Commission regarding a way forward to improve passive safety of vulnerable road users include, amongst other things, an extension of the head test area. The inclusion of passive cyclist safety is also being considered by Euro NCAP. Although passenger car to cyclist collisions are often severe and have a significant share within the accident statistics, cyclists are neither considered sufficiently in the legislative nor in the consumer ratings tests. Therefore, a test procedure to assess the protection potential of vehicle fronts in a collision with cyclists has been developed within a current research project. For this purpose, the existing pedestrian head impact test procedures were modified in order to include boundary conditions relevant for cyclists as the second big group of vulnerable road users. Based on an in-depth analysis of passenger car to cyclist accidents in Germany the three most representative accident constellations have been initially defined. The development of the test procedure itself was based on corresponding simulations with representative vehicle and bicycle models. In addition to different cyclist heights, reaching from a 6-year-old child to a 95%-male, also four pedal positions were considered. By reconstruction of a real accident the defined simulation parameters could be validated in advance. The conducted accident kinematics analysis shows for a large portion of the constellations an increased head impact area, which can reach beyond the roof leading edge, as well as high average values for head impact velocity and angle. Based on the simulation data obtained for the different vehicle models, cyclist-specific test parameters for impactor tests have been derived, which have been further examined in the course of head and leg impact tests. In order to study the cyclist accident kinematics under real test conditions, different full scale tests with a Polar-II dummy positioned on a bicycle have been conducted. Overall, the tests showed a good correlation with the simulations and support the defined boundary test conditions. Typical accident scenarios and simulations reveal higher head impact locations, angles and velocities. An extended head impact area with modified test parameters will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users including cyclists. However, due to significantly differing impact kinematics and postures between the lower extremities of pedestrians and cyclists, these injuries cannot be addressed by the means of current test tools such as the flexible pedestrian legform impactor FlexPLI. Based on the findings obtained within the project as well as the existing pedestrian protection requirements a cyclist protection test procedure for use in legislation and consumer test programmes has been developed, whose requirements have been transferred into a corresponding test specification. This specification provides common head test boundary conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, whereby the existing requirements are modified and two parallel test procedures are avoided.