Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (106) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Anfahrversuch (37)
- Safety (35)
- Impact test (veh) (34)
- Sicherheit (34)
- Bewertung (30)
- Conference (29)
- Evaluation (assessment) (29)
- Konferenz (29)
- Fahrzeug (26)
- Test method (25)
- Vehicle (25)
- Prüfverfahren (24)
- Dummy (20)
- Fußgänger (20)
- Pedestrian (20)
- Accident (19)
- Unfall (19)
- Anthropometric dummy (18)
- Verletzung (18)
- Deutschland (17)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (17)
- Germany (17)
- Injury (17)
- Collision (16)
- Head on collision (16)
- Simulation (16)
- Kompatibilität (15)
- Compatibility (14)
- Driver assistance system (14)
- Versuch (14)
- Zusammenstoß (14)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (13)
- Test (13)
- Analyse (math) (12)
- Analysis (math) (12)
- Biomechanics (11)
- Biomechanik (11)
- Europa (11)
- Europe (11)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (10)
- injury) (10)
- Car (9)
- Child (9)
- Head (9)
- Kind (9)
- Kopf (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (9)
- Severity (accid, injury) (9)
- Side impact (9)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (9)
- Verletzung) (9)
- Bemessung (8)
- Cyclist (8)
- Design (overall design) (8)
- Forschungsarbeit (8)
- Method (8)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (8)
- Research project (8)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (8)
- Severity (accid (8)
- Vehicle regulations (8)
- Verfahren (8)
- Automatic (7)
- Automatisch (7)
- Driver (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (7)
- Improvement (7)
- Insasse (7)
- Interior (veh) (7)
- Passive safety system (7)
- Standardisierung (7)
- Vehicle occupant (7)
- Verbesserung (7)
- Active safety system (6)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (6)
- Brustkorb (6)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (6)
- Gesetzgebung (6)
- Knee (human) (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Perception (6)
- Pkw (6)
- Schlag (6)
- Shock (6)
- Thorax (6)
- Unfallverhütung (6)
- Wahrnehmung (6)
- Accident prevention (5)
- Autonomes Fahren (5)
- Autonomous driving (5)
- Behaviour (5)
- Braking (5)
- Bremsung (5)
- Cost benefit analysis (5)
- Datenbank (5)
- Deformation (5)
- Development (5)
- Driver information (5)
- Entwicklung (5)
- Fahrerinformation (5)
- Fatality (5)
- Forschungsbericht (5)
- Impact test (5)
- Lkw (5)
- Lorry (5)
- Research report (5)
- Standardization (5)
- Tödlicher Unfall (5)
- Verhalten (5)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (5)
- Alte Leute (4)
- Aufprallschlitten (4)
- Database (4)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (4)
- Fahrstabilität (4)
- Impact sled (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Measurement (4)
- Messung (4)
- Modification (4)
- Motorcycle (4)
- Motorrad (4)
- Prevention (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Statistics (4)
- Statistik (4)
- Technologie (4)
- Technology (4)
- Vehicle handling (4)
- Verformung (4)
- Airbag (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Belastung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Body (car) (3)
- Collision avoidance system (3)
- Communication (3)
- EU (3)
- Efficiency (3)
- Empfindlichkeit (3)
- Ergonomics (3)
- Error (3)
- Fahrzeugführung (3)
- Fahrzeugsitz (3)
- Fehler (3)
- Front (3)
- Gewicht (3)
- Halswirbel (3)
- Human body (3)
- Intelligent transport system (3)
- Karosserie (3)
- Kommunikation (3)
- Kraftfahrzeug (3)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (3)
- Load (3)
- Mathematical model (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Official approval (3)
- Old people (3)
- Reaction (human) (3)
- Reaktionsverhalten (3)
- Rechenmodell (3)
- Risiko (3)
- Risk (3)
- Safety belt (3)
- Seat (veh) (3)
- Sensitivity (3)
- Sensor (3)
- Sicherheitsgurt (3)
- Steering (process) (3)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (3)
- Use (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Visual display (3)
- Weight (3)
- Wirbelsäule (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Ablenkung (psychol) (2)
- Anthropmetric dummy (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Antikollisionssystem (2)
- Auffahrunfall (2)
- Ausrüstung (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Bildschirm (2)
- Cause (2)
- Cervical vertebrae (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Decrease (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Distraction (2)
- Driving (veh) (2)
- Emission (2)
- Equipment (2)
- Forecast (2)
- Geschwindigkeit (2)
- Haftung (jur) (2)
- Headlamp (2)
- Hospital (2)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (2)
- Interface (2)
- International (2)
- Kamera (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Krankenhaus (2)
- Kunststoff (2)
- Leuchtdichte (2)
- Liability (2)
- Luminance (2)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (2)
- Messgerät (2)
- Nacht (2)
- Night (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- On the spot accident investigation (2)
- Organisation (2)
- Plastic material (2)
- Prognose (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Rear end collision (2)
- Rear view mirror (2)
- Rückspiegel (2)
- Scheinwerfer (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Severity (acid (2)
- Sichtbarkeit (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Speed (2)
- Spinal column (2)
- Stress (psychol) (2)
- Traffic (2)
- Traffic regulations (2)
- Transport infrastructure (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Unterfahrschutz (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (2)
- Verhütung (2)
- Verkehr (2)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (2)
- Verminderung (2)
- Sichtbarkeit (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Windschutzscheibe (2)
- Windscreen (veh) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- (menschl) (1)
- Ablenkung (1)
- Accessibility (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Accident reconstruction (1)
- Achslast (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Angle (1)
- Ankündigung (1)
- Anordnung (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Apparatus (measuring) (1)
- Articulated vehicle (1)
- Attention (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Augenbewegungen (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Axle load (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Baumusterzulassung (1)
- Baustelle (1)
- Beanspruchung (1)
- Bein (1)
- Benchmark (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Brake light (1)
- Bremslicht (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Bus (1)
- Cadaver (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Camera (1)
- Car park (1)
- Carbon dioxide (1)
- Cervical vertebrae; Conference; Evaluation (assessment); Injury; Spinal column; Test (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Compression (1)
- Congestion (traffic) (1)
- Construction (1)
- Construction site (1)
- Contact (tyre road) (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Datenerfassung (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Decke (Straße) (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Detection response task (1)
- Deterioration (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Dimension (1)
- Disstraction (1)
- Driver (veh) (1)
- Driver information system (1)
- Driving aptitude (1)
- Durability (1)
- Dynamic penetration test (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- EU directive (1)
- EU-Richtlinie (1)
- Echtzeit (1)
- Economic efficiency (1)
- Economics of transport (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emergency (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Ergonomie (1)
- Ersatzfahraufgabe (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Eye movement (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahnmarkierung (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrerinformationssystem (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrsimulator (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrtauglichkeit (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Failure (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- Foot (not a measure) (1)
- Form (1)
- Frau (1)
- Freight transport (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Frequenz (1)
- Fuel consumption (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Fuß (1)
- Gelenkfahrzeug (1)
- Grenzfläche (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Güterverkehr (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Herstellung (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Impact study (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- Increase (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kognitive Aufgabenanforderung (1)
- Kohlendioxid (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Kontrolle (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kraftstoffverbrauch (1)
- Laborexperiment (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Layout (1)
- Leichnam (1)
- Limit (1)
- Location (1)
- Lärm (1)
- Man-machine interface (1)
- Manufacture (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Materialveränderung (allg) (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nasse Straße (1)
- Noise (1)
- Notfall (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Oberfläche (1)
- Oberflächentextur (1)
- Optimum (1)
- Optische Anzeige (1)
- Organization (1)
- Organization (association) (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Parkfläche (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Productivity (1)
- Properties (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Radio (1)
- Rammsondierung (1)
- Real time (1)
- Rear (1)
- Reconstruction (accid) (1)
- Reflectorized material (1)
- Reflexstoffe (1)
- Reifen (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road marking (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rundfunk (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Safety glass (1)
- Schallpegel (1)
- Schnittstelle (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Sicherheitsglas (1)
- Side (1)
- Simulator (driving) (1)
- Size and weight regulations (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Sound level (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Soziologie (1)
- Spain (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Specification (standard ) (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Spectrum (1)
- Spektrum (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- Standard (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Stress (1)
- Stress (psycho) (1)
- Surface (1)
- Surface texture (1)
- Surfacing (1)
- Surrogate driving set-up (1)
- Surveillance (1)
- Tactile perception (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Taktiles Signal (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Tracking task (1)
- Trackingaufgabe (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic regulation (1)
- Train (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- Tyre (1)
- USA (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle regulation (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Vergrößerung (1)
- Verkehrsstauung (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Verkehrswirtschaft (1)
- Vibration (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Warning (1)
- Weather (1)
- Wet road (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Wirtschaftlichkeit (1)
- Witterung (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zugänglichkeit (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zulassung (tech) (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
When the EEVC proposed the full-scale side impact test procedure, it recommended that consideration should be given to an interior headform test in addition. This was to evaluate areas of contact not assessed by the dummy. EEVC Working Group 13 has been researching the parameters of a possible European headform test procedure in four phases. Earlier stages of the research have been presented at previous ESV conferences. The conclusions from these have suggested that the US free motion headform should be used in any European test procedure and that it should be a free flight test, not guided. This research has now culminated in proposals for a European test procedure. This paper presents the proposed EEVC side impact interior headform test procedure, giving the rationale for the test and the first results from the validation phase of the test protocol.
The objective of European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) Working Group (WG) 15 Car Crash Compatibility and Frontal Impact is to develop a test procedure(s) with associated performance criteria and limits for car frontal impact compatibility. This work should lead to improved car to car frontal compatibility and self protection without decreasing the safety in other impact configurations such as impacts with car sides, trucks, and pedestrians. The WG consists of national government representatives who are supported by industrial advisers. The WG serves as a focal point for European research conducted by national and industry sponsored projects. The WG is responsible for collating the results from this research to achieve its objectives. EEVC WG 15 serves as a steering group for the car-to-car activities in the "Improvement of Vehicle Crash Compatibility through the Development of Crash Test Procedures"(VC-COMPAT) project partly funded by the European Commission. This paper presents a review of the current European research status. It also identifies current issues with candidate test procedures and lists the parameters that should be considered in assessing compatibility. The current candidate test procedures are: an offset barrier test with the progressive deformable barrier (PDB) face; a full width wall test with or without a deformable aluminium honeycomb face and a high resolution load cell wall; an offset barrier test with the EEVC barrier and load cell wall. These candidate test procedures must allow assessment of structural interaction, frontal force levels and compartment strength. The WG will report its findings to the EEVC Steering Committee and propose a test procedure in November 2006.
The European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) Working Group 13 for Side Impact Protection has been developing an Interior Headform Test Procedure to complement the full-scale Side Impact Test Procedure for Europe and for the proposed IHRA test procedures. In real world accidents interior head contacts with severe head injuries still occur, which are not always observed in standard side impact tests with dummies. Thus a means is needed to encourage further progress in head protection. At the 2003 ESV-Conference EEVC Working Group 13 reported the results on Interior Headform Testing. Further research has been performed since and the test procedure has been improved. This paper gives an overview of its latest status. The paper presents new aspects which are included in the latest test procedure and the research work leading to these enhancements. One topic of improvement is the definition of the Free Motion Headform (FMH) impactor alignment procedure to provide guidelines to minimize excessive headform chin contact and to minimize potential variability. Research activities have also been carried out on the definition of reasonable approach head angles to avoid unrealistic test conditions. Further considerations have been given to the evaluation of head airbags, their potential benefits and a means of ensuring protection for occupants regardless of seating position and sitting height. The paper presents the research activities that have been made since the last ESV Conference in 2003 and the final proposal of the EEVC Headform Test Procedure.
The European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee wants to promote the use of more biofidelic child dummies and biomechanical based tolerance limits in regulatory and consumer testing. This study has investigated the feasibility and potential impact of Q-dummies and new injury criteria for child restraint system assessment in frontal impact. European accident statistics have been reviewed for all ECE-R44 CRS groups. For frontal impact, injury measures are recommended for the head, neck, chest and abdomen. Priority of body segment protection depends on the ECE-R44 group. The Q-dummy family is able to reflect these injuries, because of its biofidelity performance and measurement capabilities for these body segments. Currently, the Q0, Q1, Q1.5, Q3 and Q6 are available representing children of 0, 1, 1.5, 3 and 6 years old. These Q-dummies cover almost all dummy weight groups as defined in ECE-R44. Q10, representing a 10 year-old child, is under development. New child dummy injury criteria are under discussion in EEVC WG12. Therefore, the ECE-R44 criteria are assessed by comparing the existing P-dummies and new Q-dummies in ECE-R44 frontal impact sled tests. In total 300 tests covering 30 CRSs of almost all existing child seat categories are performed by 11 European organizations. From this benchmark study, it is concluded that the performance of the Q-dummy family is good with respect to repeatability of the measurement signals and the durability of the dummies. Applying ECE-R44 criteria, the first impression is that results for P- and Q-dummy are similar. For child seat evaluation the potential merits of the Q-dummy family lie in the extra measurement possibilities of these dummies and in the more biofidelic response.
In spite of today's highly sophisticated crash test procedures like the different NCAP programs running world-wide, bad real world crash performance of cars is still an issue. There are crash situations which are not sufficiently represented by actual test configurations. This is especially true for car to car, as well as for car to object impacts. The paper describes reasons for this bad performance. The reasons are in principal bad structural interaction between the car and its impact partners (geometric incompatibility), unadjusted front end stiffness (stiffness incompatibility) and collapse of passenger compartments. To show the efficiency of improving cars' structural behaviour in accidents with different impact partners an accident data analysis has been taken out by members of European Project VC-COMPAT. Accident data analysis has shown that in Germany between 15,000 and 20,000 of the now severely injured car occupants might get less injured and between 600 and 900 car occupant fatalities might be saved. Similar results arise for the UK.
As set out in the Terms of Reference, the objective of European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) Working Group (WG) 15 Car Crash Compatibility and Frontal Impact is to develop a test procedure(s) with associated performance criteria for car frontal impact compatibility. This work should lead to improved car to car frontal compatibility and self protection without decreasing the safety in other impact configuration such as impacts with car sides, trucks, and pedestrians. Since 2003, EEVC WG 15 served as a steering group for the car-to-car activities in the "Improvement of Vehicle Crash Compatibility through the development of Crash Test Procedures" (VC-COMPAT) project that was finalised at the end of 2006 and partly funded by the European Commission. This paper presents the research work carried out in the VC-COMPAT project and the results of its assessment by EEVC WG 15. Other additional work presented by the UK and French governments and industry " in particular the European industry - was taken into consideration. It also identifies current issues with candidate testing approaches. The candidate test approaches are: - an offset barrier test with the progressive deformable barrier (PDB) face in combination with a full width rigid barrier test - a full width wall test with a deformable aluminium honeycomb face and a high resolution load cell wall supplemented by the forces measured in the offset deformable barrier (ODB) test with the current EEVC barrier. These candidate test approaches must assess the structural interaction and give information of frontal force levels and compartment strength for passenger vehicles. Further, this paper presents the planned route map of EEVC WG 15 for the evaluation of the proposed test procedures and assessment criteria.
At the 2005 ESV conference, the International Harmonisation of Research Activities (IHRA) side impact working group proposed a 4 part draft test procedure, to form the basis of harmonisation of regulation world-wide and to help advances in car occupant protection. This paper presents the work performed by a European Commission 6th framework project, called APROSYS, an further development and evaluation of the proposed procedure from a European perspective. The 4 parts of the proposed procedure are: - A Mobile Deformable Barrier test; - An oblique Pole side impact test; - Interior headform tests; - Side Out of Position (OOP) tests. Full scale test and modelling work to develop the Advanced European Mobile Deformable Barrier (AE-MDB) further is described, resulting in a recommendation to revise the barrier face to include a bumper beam element. An evaluation of oblique and perpendicular pole tests was made from tests and numerical simulations using ES-2 and WorldSID 50th percentile dummies. It was concluded that an oblique pole test is feasible but that a perpendicular test would be preferable for Europe. The interior headform test protocol was evaluated to assess its repeatability and reproducibility and to solve issues such as the head impact angle and limitation zones. Recommendations for updates to the test protocol are made. Out-of-position (OOP) tests applicable for the European situation were performed, which included additional tests with Child Restraint Systems (CRS) which use is mandatory in Europe. It was concluded that the proposed IHRA OOP tests do cover the worst case situations, but the current test protocol is not ready for regulatory use.
The use of proper child restraint systems (CRS) is mandatory for children travelling in cars in most countries of the world. The analysis of the quantity of restrained children shows that more than 90% of the children in Germany are restrained. Looking at the quality of the protection, a large discrepancy between restrained and well protected children can be seen. Two out of three children in Germany are not properly restrained. In addition, considerable difference exists with respect to the technical performance of CRS. For that reason investigations and optimisations on two different topics are necessary: The technical improvement of CRS and the ease of use of CRS. Consideration of the knowledge gained by the comparison of different CRS in crash tests would lead to some improvements of the CRS. But improvement of child safety is not only a technical issue. People should use CRS in the correct way. Misuse and incorrect handling could lead to less safety than correct usage of a poor CRS. For that reason new technical issues are necessary to improve the child safety AND the ease of use. Only the combination of both parts can significantly increase child safety. For the assessment of the safety level of common CRS, frontal and lateral sled tests simulating different severity levels were conducted comparing pairs of CRS which were felt to be good and CRS which were felt to be poor. The safety of some CRS is currently at a high level. All well known products were not damaged in the performed tests. The performance of non-branded CRS was mostly worse than that of the well known products. Although the branded child restraint systems already show a high safety level it is still possible to further improve their technical performance as demonstrated with a baby shell and a harness type CRS.
Today, Euro NCAP is a well established rating system for passive car safety. The significance of the ratings must however be evaluated by comparison with national accident data. For this purpose accidents with involvement of two passenger cars have been taken from the German National Road Accident Register (record years 1998 to 2004) to evaluate the results of the NCAP frontal impact test configuration. Injury data from both drivers involved in frontal car to car collisions have been sampled and have been compared, using a "Bradley Terry Model" which is well established in the area of paired comparisons. Confounders " like mass ratio of the cars involved, gender of the driver, etc. " have been accounted for in the statistical model. Applying the Bradley Terry Model to the national accident data the safety ranking from Euro NCAP has been validated (safety level: 1star <2 star <3 star <4 star). Significant safety differences are found between cars of the 1 and 2 star category as compared to cars of the 3 and 4 star category. The impact of the mass ratio was highly significant and most influential. Changing the mass ratio by an amount of 10% will raise the chance for the driver of the heavier car to get better off by about 18%. The impact of driver gender was again highly significant, showing a nearly 2 times lower injury risk for male drivers. With regard to the NCAP rating drivers of a high rated car are more than 2 times more probable (70% chance) to get off less injured in a frontal collision as compared to the driver of a low rated car.
Since 2005 the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) also records aspects of active vehicle safety. This is done because vehicles are fitted with an increasing number of active safety devices which have undoubtedly an influence on the number, severity and course of accidents. Accident researchers expect that collecting active safety data will facilitate to assess and quantify the impact of these and future devices. It is the aim of this paper to outline benefits and limitations associated with the recording of active safety aspects within indepth studies. An overview about possible areas where active safety data can be useful will be given. For that purpose single safety or comfort systems will be selected to estimate the effects of an accident database which includes variables associated with these systems. Questions with regard to the limitations of collecting active safety data will be addressed. Possible items are for example the usability of the data recorded, the real accident cause, the small number of relevant accidents, the time span needed to gather a sufficient dataset, the small share of vehicles equipped with a certain system or different functionalities of systems that are supposed to fall in the same category. As a result user needs for a reasonable data collection of active safety elements will be elaborated.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
The PDB, BASt and Opel conducted two test series to evaluate possible effects on the results obtained using the EEVC WG17 Lower Legform Impactor as a test tool for the assessment of pedestrian safety. The reproducibility and repeatability of the test results were assessed using six legform impactors while keeping the test parameters constant. In the second series one impactor was used and the test parameters were varied to assess the effects on the readings of the legform. The test parameters were velocity, temperature, relative humidity, the point of first contact regarding the deviation in z-direction and the deviations of the pitch, roll and yaw angle. The tests were performed using an inverse setup, i.e. the legform was hit by a guided linear impactor equipped with a honeycomb deformation element. This setup was chosen to be able to vary each single parameter while avoiding variations of the other test parameters at the same time. The test parameters were varied stronger than allowed in regulatory use in order to determine possible dependencies between the parameters and the readings which were acceleration, bending angle and shear displacement.
Powered Two Wheelers (PTWs) accidents constitute one of the road safety problems in Europe. PTWs fatalities represent 22% at EU level in 2006, having increased during last years, representing an opposite trend compared to other road users" figures. In order to reduce these figures it is necessary to investigate the accident causation mechanisms from different points of view (e.g.: human factor, vehicle characteristics, influence of the environment, type of accident). SAFERIDER project ("Advanced telematics for enhancing the SAFEty and comfort of motorcycle RIDERs", under the European Commission "7th Framework Program") has investigated PTW accident mechanisms through literature review and statistical analyses of National and In-depth accident databases; detecting and describing all the possible PTW's accident configurations where the implementation of ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) and IVIS (In-Vehicle Information Systems) could contribute to avoid an accident or mitigate its severity. DIANA, the Spanish in-depth database developed by CIDAUT, has been analyzed for that purpose. DIANA comprises of accident investigation teams, in close cooperation with police forces, medical services, forensic surgeons, garages and scrap yards. An important innovation is the fact that before injured people arrive to hospitals, photographs and explanations about the possible accident injury mechanisms are sent to the respective hospitals (via 3G GPRS technology). By this, additional information to medical staff can be provided in order to predict in advance possible internal injuries and select the best medical treatment. This methodology is presented in this paper. On the other hand, the main results (corresponding to road, rider and PTW characteristics; pre and post-accident manoeuvres; road layout; rider behaviour; impact points; accident causations;...) from the analyses of the PTW accidents used for SAFERIDER are shown. Only accident types relevant to ADAS and IVIS devices have been considered.
Since its beginning in 1999, the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) evolved into the presumably leading representative road traffic accident investigation in Europe, based on the work started in Hanover in 1973. The detailed and comprehensive description of traffic accidents forms an essential basis for vehicle safety research. Due to the ongoing extension of demands of researchers, there is a continuous progress in the techniques and systematic of accident investigation within GIDAS. This paper presents some of the most important developments over the last years. Primary vehicle safety systems are expected to have a significant and increasing influence on reducing accidents. GIDAS therefore began to include and collect active safety parameters as new variables from the year 2005 onwards. This will facilitate to assess the impact of present and future active safety measures. A new system to analyse causation factors of traffic accidents, called ACASS, was implemented in GIDAS in the year 2008. The whole process of data handling was optimised. Since 2005 the on-scene data acquisition is completely conducted with mobile tablet PCs. Comprehensive plausibility checks assure a high data quality. Multi-language codebooks are automatically generated from the database structure itself and interfaces ensure the connection to various database management systems. Members of the consortium can download database and codebook, and synchronize half a terabyte of photographic documentation through a secured online access. With the introduction of the AIS 2005 in the year 2006, some medical categorizations have been revised. To ensure the correct assignment of AIS codes to specific injuries an application based on a diagnostic dictionary was developed. Furthermore a coding tool for the AO classification was introduced. All these enhancements enable GIDAS to be up to date for future research questions.
In the last years there has been a decline in accident figures in Germany especially for four wheeled vehicles. At the same time, accident figures for motorcycles remained nearly constant. About 17 % of road traffic fatalities in the year 2006 were motorcyclists. 33 % of these riders were killed in single vehicle crashes. This leads to the conclusion that improving driving dynamics and driving stability of powered two wheelers would yield considerable safety gains. However, the well-known measures for cars and trucks with their proven effectiveness cannot be transferred easily to motorcycles. Therefore studies were carried out to examine the safety potential of Anti Lock Braking Systems (ABS) and Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) for motorcycles by means of accident analysis, driving tests and economical as well as technical assessment of the systems. With regard to ABS, test persons were assigned braking tasks (straight and in-curve) with five different brake systems with and without ABS. Stopping distances as well as stress and strain on the riders were measured for 9 test riders who completed 105 braking manoeuvres each. Knowing the ability of ABS to avoid falls during braking in advance of a crash and taking into account the system costs, a cost benefit analysis for ABS for motorcycles was carried out for different market penetration of ABS, i.e. equipment rates, and different time horizons. The potential of VSC for motorcycles was estimated in two steps. First the kinds of accidents that could be prevented by such a system at all have been analysed. For these accident configurations, simulations and driving tests were then performed to determine if a VSC was able to detect the critical driving situation and if it was technically possible to implement an actuator which would help to stabilise the critical situation.
Within the process of integrating passenger airbags in the vehicle fleet a problem of compatibility between the passenger airbag and rear-facing child restraint systems was recognised. Especially in the US several accidents with children killed by the passenger airbag were recorded. Taking into account these accidents the deactivation of a present passenger airbag is mandatory if a child is carried in a rear-facing child restraint system at the front passenger seat in all member states of the European Union. This rule is in force since the deadline of 2003/20/EC at the latest. In the past a passenger airbag either could not be disabled or could only be disabled by a garage. Today there are a lot of different possibilities for the car driver himself to disable the airbag. Solutions like an on/off-switch or the automatic detection of a child restraint system are mentioned as an example. Taking into account the need for the deactivation of front passenger airbags two types of misuse can occur: transportation of an infant while the airbag is (still) enabled and transportation of an adult, while the airbag is disabled, respectively. Within a research project funded by BASt both options of misuse were analysed utilising two different types of surveys amongst users (field observations and interviews, Internet-questionnaires). In addition both analysis of accident data and crash tests for an updated assessment of the injury risk caused by the front passenger airbag were conducted. Both surveys indicate a low risk of misuse. Most of the misuse cases were observed in older cars, which offer no easy way to disable the airbag. For systems, which detect a child seat automatically, no misuse could be found. The majority of misuses in cars equipped with a manual switch were caused by reasons of oblivion. Also the accident analysis indicates a minor risk of misuse. From more than 300 cases of the GIDAS accident sample that were analysed, only 24 children were using the front passenger seat in cars equipped with a front passenger airbag. In most of these cases the airbag was deactivated. When misuse occurred the injury severity was low. However, when analysing German single accidents the fatality risk caused by the front passenger airbag became obvious. From the technical point of view, there were important changes in the design of passenger airbags in recent years. Not only volume and shape were modified, but also the mounting position of the entire airbag module was changed fundamentally. Even if these findings do not allow obtaining general conclusions, a clear tendency of less danger by airbags could be identified. For future vehicle development a safe combination of airbags and rear faced baby seats seems to be possible in the long term. This would mean that both types of misuse could be eliminated. For parents an easier use of child seat and car would be the result.
In the EC FP6 Integrated Project Advanced Protection Systems, APROSYS, the first WorldSID small female prototype was developed and evaluated by BASt, FTSS, INRETS, TRL and UPM-INSIA during 2006 and 2007. Results were presented at the ESV 2007 conference (Been et al., 2007). With the prototype dummy scoring a biofidelity rating higher than 6.7 out of 10 according to ISO/TR9790, the results were very promising. Also opportunities for further development were identified by the evaluation group. A revised prototype, Revision1, was subsequently developed in the 2007-2008 period to address comments from the evaluation group. The Revision1 dummy includes changes in the half arms and the suit (anthropometry and arm biomechanics), the thorax and abdomen ribs and sternum (rib durability), the abdomen/lumbar area and the lower legs (mass distribution). Also a two-dimensional chest deflection measurement system was developed to measure deflection in both lateral and anterior-posterior direction to improve oblique thorax loading sensitivity. Two Revision1 prototype dummies have now been evaluated by FTSS, TRL, UPM-INSIA and BASt. The updated prototype dummies were subjected to an extensive matrix of biomechanical tests, such as full body pendulum tests and lateral sled impact tests as specified by Wayne State University, Heidelberg University and Medical College of Wisconsin. The results indicated a significant improvement of dummy biofidelity. The overall dummy biofidelity in the ISO rating system has significantly improved from 6.7 to 7.6 on a scale between 0-10. The small female WorldSID has now obtained the same biofidelity rating as the WorldSID mid size male dummy. Also repeatability improved with respect to the prototype. In conclusion the recommended updates were all executed and all successfully contributed in achieving improved performance of the dummy.
According to the German road traffic regulations children up to the age of 12 or a height below 150 cm have to use approved and appropriate child restraint systems (CRS). CRS must be approved according to UN-ECE Regulation No. 44. The regulation classifies CRS in 5 weight categories. The upper weight group is approved for children from 22 to 36 kg. However, studies show that already today many children weigh more than 36 kg although they have not reached a height of 150 cm. Therefore, no ECE R44 approved CRS is available for these overweight children. In conclusion, today's sizes and weights of children are no longer represented by the current version of the ECE R44. The heaviest used dummy (P10) weighs just 32.6 kg and has a height of 137.9 cm. Statistical data of German children show that already 5% of the children at a height of 137.9 cm have a weight above 45.3 kg. Regarding children at a height of 145 cm, the 95th percentile limit is at a weight of 53.3 kg. Based on these data 4 dummies with different heights and weights were defined and produced. Two of them are overweight. Up to now, there is no experience how current child restraint systems perform in a car crash if they are used by children with a weight above 36 kg and a height smaller than 150 cm. In the future, different child restraint systems will be tested with respect to the ECE R44 regulation using these overweight dummies.
This paper describes the methodology for the assessment of the socio-economic impact of SAFESPOT applications. The applications selected for the assessment cover vehicle to vehicle (v2v) as well as vehicle to infrastructure (v2i) communication systems. The applications address main problem areas of road safety: accidents at intersections, accidents due to hazardous road and weather conditions and accidents due to over speeding and inappropriate distance. The assessment methodology relies in its core on cost-benefit analysis (CBA) as the most widespread tool to assess the profitability of applications form the society point of view. The assessment is however not limited to CBA but also considers the economic effects for particular stakeholder groups such as users, public authorities and the like. Their individual cost and benefits can be investigated in stakeholder analyses. Both elements, CBA and stakeholder analysis, form an integrated assessment approach which is applied here. The assessment makes use of the sound methodological base which was provided by projects such as SEiSS and eIMPACT. Some characteristics of co-operative systems however call for special attention within the assessment. Most prominently, the assessment will concentrate on a bundle of applications. The impact of this bundle will be assessed under the conditions of different business and service models. These issues will be addressed in the paper. Moreover, this paper also provides insight in likely patterns of results and first results of socio-economic impact assessment itself.