91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (164) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (100)
- Konferenz (97)
- Germany (53)
- Deutschland (52)
- Accident (48)
- Unfall (48)
- Safety (44)
- Sicherheit (44)
- Fahrzeug (38)
- Vehicle (36)
- Simulation (34)
- Anfahrversuch (33)
- Bewertung (33)
- Evaluation (assessment) (33)
- Active safety system (31)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (30)
- Fußgänger (30)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (30)
- Pedestrian (30)
- Impact test (veh) (28)
- Test method (27)
- Collision (26)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (26)
- Injury (26)
- Passive safety system (26)
- Prüfverfahren (26)
- Verletzung (26)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (25)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (25)
- Severity (accid, injury) (24)
- Analyse (math) (23)
- Car (23)
- Zusammenstoß (23)
- Analysis (math) (22)
- Driver assistance system (22)
- Accident prevention (21)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (20)
- Unfallverhütung (20)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (19)
- Verletzung) (19)
- injury) (19)
- Efficiency (18)
- Head on collision (18)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (18)
- Severity (accid (18)
- Anthropometric dummy (17)
- Reconstruction (accid) (17)
- Versuch (17)
- Datenbank (16)
- Dummy (16)
- Test (16)
- Driver (14)
- Pkw (14)
- Europa (13)
- Europe (13)
- Fahrer (13)
- Radfahrer (13)
- Child (12)
- Data bank (12)
- Insasse (12)
- Kind (12)
- Statistics (12)
- Cyclist (11)
- On the spot accident investigation (11)
- Prevention (11)
- Statistik (11)
- Antikollisionssystem (10)
- Biomechanics (10)
- Biomechanik (10)
- Collision avoidance system (10)
- Improvement (10)
- Vehicle occupant (10)
- Verbesserung (10)
- Autonomes Fahren (9)
- Autonomous driving (9)
- Development (9)
- Entwicklung (9)
- Forschungsarbeit (9)
- Research project (9)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (9)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (9)
- Vehicle regulations (9)
- Accident reconstruction (8)
- Auffahrunfall (8)
- Automatisch (8)
- International (8)
- Kompatibilität (8)
- Lorry (8)
- Method (8)
- Side impact (8)
- Standardisierung (8)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (8)
- Verfahren (8)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (8)
- Automatic (7)
- Compatibility (7)
- Cost benefit analysis (7)
- Datenerfassung (7)
- Fahrzeugsitz (7)
- Fehler (7)
- Geschwindigkeit (7)
- Head (7)
- Kopf (7)
- PKW (7)
- Rear end collision (7)
- Risiko (7)
- Sicherheitsgurt (7)
- Speed (7)
- Verhütung (7)
- Verminderung (7)
- Alte Leute (6)
- Bemessung (6)
- Benutzung (6)
- Braking (6)
- Bremsung (6)
- Cause (6)
- Data acquisition (6)
- Decrease (6)
- Deformation (6)
- Design (overall design) (6)
- Error (6)
- Fahrstabilität (6)
- Fatality (6)
- Interior (veh) (6)
- Knee (human) (6)
- Lkw (6)
- Mathematical model (6)
- Motorrad (6)
- Official approval (6)
- Rechenmodell (6)
- Risk (6)
- Road user (6)
- Safety belt (6)
- Seat (veh) (6)
- Standardization (6)
- Tödlicher Unfall (6)
- Ursache (6)
- Use (6)
- Vehicle handling (6)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (6)
- Überschlagen (6)
- Airbag (5)
- Aufprallschlitten (5)
- Body (car) (5)
- Brustkorb (5)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (5)
- EU (5)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (5)
- Gesetzgebung (5)
- Impact sled (5)
- Impact test (5)
- Interview (5)
- Karosserie (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Motorcycle (5)
- Old people (5)
- Policy (5)
- Politik (5)
- Prognose (5)
- Sensor (5)
- Technologie (5)
- Technology (5)
- Thorax (5)
- Verformung (5)
- Behaviour (4)
- Bremse (4)
- Cervical vertebrae (4)
- Database (4)
- Detection (4)
- Digital model (4)
- Driver information (4)
- Electronic stability program (4)
- Fahrzeugführung (4)
- Halswirbel (4)
- Japan (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Modification (4)
- Motorcyclist (4)
- Motorradfahrer (4)
- Numerisches Modell (4)
- Overturning (veh) (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Verhalten (4)
- Accident rate (3)
- Advanced driver assistance system (3)
- Air bag (restraint system) (3)
- Attitude (psychol) (3)
- Ausrüstung (3)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (3)
- Autonomous vehicle (3)
- Baumusterzulassung (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Belastung (3)
- Berechnung (3)
- Brake (3)
- Bus (3)
- Correlation (math, stat) (3)
- Crashtest (3)
- Damage (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Delivery vehicle (3)
- Detektion (3)
- Driver training (3)
- Driving (veh) (3)
- Einstellung (psychol) (3)
- Electric vehicle (3)
- Elektrofahrzeug (3)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (3)
- Equipment (3)
- Fahranfänger (3)
- Fahrausbildung (3)
- Forecast (3)
- Front (3)
- Gewicht (3)
- Head restraint (3)
- Human body (3)
- Impact study (3)
- Intelligent transport system (3)
- Knotenpunkt (3)
- Kopfstütze (3)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (3)
- Leg (human) (3)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (3)
- Load (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Recently qualified driver (3)
- Sachschaden (3)
- Sichtbarkeit (3)
- Steering (process) (3)
- Steifigkeit (3)
- Stiffness (3)
- Straßenverkehr (3)
- Traffic (3)
- USA (3)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (3)
- United Kingdom (3)
- Unterfahrschutz (3)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (3)
- Verkehr (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Sichtbarkeit (3)
- Warning (3)
- Warnung (3)
- Weight (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Active safety (2)
- Adolescent (2)
- Age (2)
- Aktive Sicherheit (2)
- Alter (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (2)
- Arbeitsgruppe (2)
- Automatische Notbremsung (2)
- Autonomous emergency braking (2)
- Bicyclist (2)
- Bremsweg (2)
- Calculation (2)
- Classification (2)
- Coach (2)
- Data security (2)
- Datensicherheit (2)
- Dynamics (2)
- Dynamik (2)
- Effectiveness (2)
- Electronic driving aid (2)
- Elektronische Fahrhilfe (2)
- Empfindlichkeit (2)
- Entdeckung (2)
- Erste Hilfe (2)
- Estimation (2)
- Fahrdatenschreiber (2)
- Fahrerinformation (2)
- Feuer (2)
- Fire (2)
- First aid (2)
- Form (2)
- France (2)
- Frankreich (2)
- Frau (2)
- Headlamp (2)
- Highway traffic (2)
- Hinten (2)
- Individueller Verkehr (2)
- Information (2)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (2)
- Intersection (2)
- Jugendlicher (2)
- Kamera (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Kontrolle (2)
- Kraftfahrzeug (2)
- LKW (2)
- Landstraße (2)
- Lieferfahrzeug (2)
- Location (2)
- Measurement (2)
- Messung (2)
- Nacht (2)
- Night (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- Occupant (veh) (2)
- Ort (Position) (2)
- Passenger (2)
- Perception (2)
- Post crash (2)
- Private transport (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Rear (2)
- Regression analysis (2)
- Regressionsanalyse (2)
- Reifen (2)
- Reisebus (2)
- Restraint system (2)
- Richtlinien (2)
- Risikobewertung (2)
- Risk assessment (2)
- Road network (2)
- Rural road (2)
- Sample (mater) (2)
- Scheinwerfer (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Schweden (2)
- Seite (2)
- Sensitivity (2)
- Side (2)
- Spain (2)
- Spanien (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Specifications (2)
- Spinal column (2)
- Straßennetz (2)
- Surveillance (2)
- Technische Vorschriften (2)
- Tyre (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallverhuetung (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Untersuchung am unfallort (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Wahrnehmung (2)
- Windschutzscheibe (2)
- Wirbelsäule (2)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (2)
- Working group (2)
- Zulassung (tech) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- Ablenkung (psychol) (1)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (1)
- Accident data (1)
- Accompanied driving (1)
- Accuracy (1)
- Active safety system; Automatic; Brake; Car; Collision avoidance system; Conference; Driver assistance system; Germany; Impact test (veh); Rear end collision; Severity (accid (1)
- Activity report (1)
- Adaptive cruise control (1)
- Administration (1)
- Adult (1)
- Advanced vehicle control systems (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Airbag (restraint system) (1)
- Angle (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Atives Sicherheitssystem (1)
- Attention (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Aufzeichung (1)
- Austria (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Befreiung (Bergung) (1)
- Begleitetes Fahren (1)
- Benefit cost analysis (1)
- Bewehrung (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bildschirm (1)
- Blickfeld (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Braking distance (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Budget (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Camera (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Clothing (1)
- Collision test (veh) (1)
- Comfort (1)
- Communication (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Components of the vehicle (1)
- Compression (1)
- Computation (1)
- Construction (1)
- Contact (tyre (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Crash Test (1)
- Crash helmet (1)
- Crash test (1)
- Cross roads (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Customer (1)
- Damping (1)
- Data collection (1)
- Data processing (1)
- Data transmission (1)
- Datenverarbeitung (1)
- Datenübertragung (telekom) (1)
- Dauer (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Demand (econ) (1)
- Demographie (1)
- Deutschland ; Konferenz (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital computer (1)
- Digitalrechner (1)
- Displacement (1)
- Distraction (1)
- Driver experience (1)
- Driving (1)
- Driving aid (electronic) (1)
- Dtetection (1)
- Durability (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- Dämpfung (1)
- EU directive (1)
- EU-Richtlinie (1)
- Echtzeit (1)
- Education (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Eins (1)
- Ejection (1)
- Electric bicycle (1)
- Elektrofahrrad (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogram (1)
- Emission control (1)
- Emissionskontrolle (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Environment protection (1)
- Ergonomics (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- Erziehung (1)
- Eu (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- European Union (1)
- Event data recorder (Road vehicle) (1)
- Event data recorder (road vehicle) (1)
- Extrication (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrer ; Fahrerassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrerinformationen (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrsimulator (1)
- Fahrstreifen (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Fahrzeugdach (1)
- Fahrzeugflotte (1)
- Fahrzeugteil (Sicherheit) (1)
- Fahrzeugteile (1)
- Failure (1)
- Field of vision (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fleet of vehicles (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Geometry (shape) (1)
- Gesetzesdurchführung (1)
- Gestaltung (1)
- Government (national) (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Harmonisation (1)
- Harmonisierung (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Hazard (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Herausschleudern (1)
- Highway (1)
- Homogeneity (1)
- Homogenität (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Human machine interface (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- Inertia reel safety belt (1)
- Information documentation (1)
- Information management (1)
- Injury) (1)
- Installation (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interactive model (1)
- Interaktives Modell (1)
- Itinerary (1)
- Junction (1)
- Kleidung (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Komfort (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Kreuzung (1)
- Kunde (1)
- Kunststoff (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Lap strap (1)
- Lateral collision (1)
- Law enforcement (1)
- Layout (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (Allg.) (1)
- Leuchtdichte (1)
- Limit (1)
- Luminance (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Massenunfall (1)
- Matrix (1)
- Mensch Maschine Schnittstelle (1)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (1)
- Messgerät (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Mobilität (1)
- Model (not math) (1)
- Modell (1)
- Montage (1)
- Moped (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Multiple collision (1)
- Nachfrage (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Nasse Straße (1)
- Naturalistic Driving (1)
- Naturalistic driving (1)
- Nigeria (1)
- On the scene accident investigation (1)
- One (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Output (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Overturning (1)
- Passive restraint system (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Plastic material (1)
- Police (1)
- Polizei (1)
- Population (1)
- Portugal (1)
- Probability (1)
- Probe (1)
- Properties (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Prüfkörper (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Quality (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualität (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radar (1)
- Radio (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Real time (1)
- Rear view mirror (1)
- Recording (1)
- Reduction (decrease) (1)
- Reflectorized material (1)
- Reflexstoffe (1)
- Regierung (staat) (1)
- Reifenprofil (1)
- Reinforcement (in mater) (1)
- Reiseweg (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road (1)
- Road traffic (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Roll over (veh) (1)
- Roof (veh) (1)
- Rotation (1)
- Route guidance (1)
- Rundfunk (1)
- Rückspiegel (1)
- Safety harness (1)
- Safety system (1)
- Schlag (1)
- Schleudertrauma (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzhelm (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Seat (1)
- Seat belt (1)
- Seat harness (1)
- Severity (accid, injuy) (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shock (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Simulator (driving) (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Stochastic process (1)
- Stochastischer Prozess (1)
- Stopping distance (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Straße (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Sweden (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Teenage driver (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telefon (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telephone (1)
- Tension (1)
- Tests (1)
- Time (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic lanes (1)
- Train (1)
- Transport infrastructure (1)
- Tunnel (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- Tyre tread (1)
- Tätigkeitsbericht (1)
- Umweltschutz (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfalldaten (1)
- Unfallfolgemaßnahme (1)
- Unfallfolgephase (1)
- Unfallverhütug (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Untersuchung am Umfallort (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Usa (1)
- Vehicle Regulations (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle safety (1)
- Vehicle safety device (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreichl (1)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Vermeidung (1)
- Verschiebung (1)
- Versuchspuppe (1)
- Verwaltung (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Visual display (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Wahrscheinlichkeit (1)
- Wet road (1)
- Whiplash injury (1)
- Window (veh) (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Women (1)
- Zeit (1)
- Zielführungssystem (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zug (mech) (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- ZusammenstoÃüï-¿-½Ãƒ-¯Ã‚-¿Ã‚-½ (1)
- efficiency (1)
- head (1)
- road) (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Österreich (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
For more than a decade, ADAC accident researchers have analysed road accidents with severe injuries, recording some 20,000 accidents. An important task in accident research is to determine the causative factors of road accidents. Apart from vehicle engineering and human factors, accident research also focuses on infrastructural and environmental aspects. To find out what accident scenarios are the most common in ADAC accident research and what driver assistance systems can prevent them, our first task was to conduct a detailed accident analysis. Using CarMaker, we performed a realistic simulation of accident scenarios, including crashes, with varying parameters. To begin with, we made an initial selection of driver assistance systems in order to determine those with the greatest accident prevention potential. One important finding of this study is that the safety potential of the individual driver assistance systems can actually be examined. It also turned out that active safety offers even much more potential for development and innovation than passive safety. At the same time, testing becomes more demanding, too, as new systems keep entering the market, many of them differing in functional details. ADAC will continue to test all driver assistance systems as realistically as possible so as to be able to provide advice to car buyers. Therefore, it will be essential to develop and improve test conditions and criteria.
At IAM RoadSmart we share the excitement about autonomous cars " who wouldn't! However over half of the drivers we polled supported concentrating on making drivers safer " among IAM RoadSmart members it was 70%. Driverless cars are still years away but delivering safer drivers can help reduce death and injury from tomorrow. Governments, academics and car makers need to work hard to convince sceptical British and American drivers that autonomous cars can deliver the benefits promised such as a 90% plus reduction in road deaths.
The advent of active safety systems calls for the development of appropriate testing methods. These methods aim to assess the effectivity of active safety systems based on criteria such as their capability to avoid accidents or lower impact speeds and thus mitigate the injury severity. For prospective effectivity studies, simulation becomes an important tool that needs valid models not only to simulate driving dynamics and safety systems, but also to resolve the collision mechanics. This paper presents an impact model which is based on solving momentum conservation equations and uses it in an effectivity study of a generic collision mitigation system in reconstructed real accidents at junctions. The model assumes an infinitely short crash duration and computes output parameters such as post-crash velocities, delta-v, force directions, etc. and is applicable for all impact collision configurations such as oblique, excentric collisions. Requiring only very little computational effort, the model is especially useful for effectivity studies where large numbers of simulations are necessary. Validation of the model is done by comparison with results from the widely used reconstruction software PC-Crash. Vehicles involved in the accidents are virtually equipped with a collision mitigation system for junctions using the software X-RATE, and the simulations (referred to as system simulations) are started sufficiently early before the collision occurred. In order to assess the effectivity, the real accident (referred to as baseline) is compared with the system simulations by computing the reduction of the impact speeds and delta-v.
The incidence of side impacts was investigated from GIDAS data. Both vehicle-fixed object and vehicle-vehicle collisions were analysed as these are enclosed within the consumer testing program. Vehicle-fixed object collisions were stratified according to ESC availability. Results indicated that vehicles equipped with ESC rarely have pure-lateral impacts. An increase in oblique collisions was seen for the vehicles with ESC whereby most vehicle were driving in left curves. The analysis of vehicle-vehicle collisions developed injury risk curves were developed at the AIS3+ injury severity for the vehicle-vehicle side impacts. Results suggested that greatest injury risk occurred when a Pre Euro NCAP vehicle was struck by a Post Euro-NCAP vehicle. The remaining curves did not show different behaviour, indicating that stiffness increased have been equally combated. This was attributable to the few Post Euro-NCAP vehicles that had a deployed curtain airbag available in the sample. The integration of Euro NCAP testing has shown to improve vehicle crashworthiness for pole collisions, as those vehicles with ESC rarely incur lateral impacts.
Injury probability functions for pedestrians and bicyclists based on real-world accident data
(2017)
The paper is focusing on the modelling of injury severity probabilities, often called as Injury Risk Functions (IRF). These are mathematical functions describing the probability for a defined population and for possible explanatory factors (variables) to sustain a certain injury severity. Injury risk functions are becoming more and more important as basis for the assessment of automotive safety systems. They contribute to the understanding of injury mechanisms, (prospective) evaluation of safety systems and definition of protection criteria or are used within regulation and/or consumer ratings. In all cases, knowledge about the correlation between mechanical behavior and injury severity is needed. IRFs are often based on biomechanical data. This paper is focusing on the derivation of injury probability models from real world accident data of the GIDAS database (German In-depth Accident Study). In contrast to most academic terms there is no explicit term definition or definition of creation processes existing for injury probability models based on empirical data. Different approaches are existing for such kind of models in the field of accident research. There is a need for harmonization in terms of the used methods and data as well as the handling with the existing challenges. These are preparation of the dataset, model assumptions, censored/unknown data, evaluation of model accuracy, definition of dependent and independent variable, and others. In the presented study, several empirical, statistical and phenomenological approaches were analyzed regarding their advantages and disadvantages and also their applicability. Furthermore, the identification of appropriate prediction parameters for the injury severity of pedestrians has been considered. Due to its main effect on injuries of pedestrians and bicyclists, the importance of the secondary impact has also been analyzed. Finally, the model accuracy, evaluated by several criteria, is the rating factor that gives the quality and reliability for application of the resulting models. After the investigation and evaluation of statistical approaches one method was chosen and appropriate prediction variables were examined. Finally, all findings were summarized and injury risk functions for pedestrians in real world accidents were created. Additionally, the paper gives instructions for the interpretation and usage of such functions. The presented results include IRFs for several injury severity levels and age groups. The presented models are based on a high amount of real world accidents and describe very well the injury severity probability of pedestrians and bicyclists in frontal collisions with current vehicles. The functions can serve as basis for the evaluation of effectiveness of systems like Pedestrian-AEB or Bicycle-AEB.
Bus or heavy vehicle passenger accidents are rare events, compared with car accidents, but sometimes leads to a large number of victims especially in rollover crash scenarios. Two accidents occurred in Portugal in 2007 and 2013 in which 28 people died and more than 50 are injured, shown the importance of the investigation of such accidents. For the investigation of these accidents multidisciplinary teams are constituted with engineers and police officers. All the factors involved are taken into consideration including road design, traffic signs, maintenance and hardware, human factors, and vehicle factors. In this work a methodology to an accurate collection of the data is proposed. From the information collected the accident is reconstructed using the PC-CrashTM software. From this all the contribution factors are determined and recommendations to mitigate these crashes are listed. These two accidents are rollover accidents and the analysis of the injuries and its correlation with the use of retention systems is very important. From the medical data and with the dynamics of the accident determined simulations of the occupants with biomechanical models are carried out in order to evaluate the effect of the retention systems in the injuries. This analysis is based on injury criteria (such as Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) or Injury Severity Scale (ISS)). With this it is possible to determine if the seat belt was worn or not.
In most of developed countries, the progress made in passive safety during the last three decades allowed to drastically reduce the number of killed and severely injured especially for occupants of passenger cars. This reduction is mainly observed for frontal impacts for which the AIS3+ injuries has been reduced about 52% for drivers and 38% for front passengers. The stiffening of the cars' structure coupled with the generalization of airbags and the improvement of the seatbelt restraint (load limiter, pretension, etc.) allowed to protect vital body regions such as head, neck and thorax. However, the abdomen did not take advantage with so much success of this progress. The objective of this study is to draw up an inventory on the abdominal injuries of the belted car occupants involved in frontal impact, to present adapted counter-measures and to assess their potential effectiveness. In the first part the stakes corresponding to the abdominal injuries will be defined according to types of impact, seat location, occupants' age and type of injured organs. Then, we shall focus on the abdominal injury risk curves for adults involved in frontal impact and on the comparisons of the average risks according to the seat location. In the second part we will list counter-measures and we shall calculate their effectiveness. The method of case control will be used in order to estimate odds ratio, comparing two samples, given by occupants having or not having the studied safety system. For this study, two type of data sources are used: national road injured accident census and retrospective in-depth accident data collection. Abdominal injuries are mainly observed in frontal impact (52%). Fatal or severe abdominal occupant- injuries are observed at least in 27% of cases, ranking this body region as the most injured just after the thorax (51%). In spite of a twice lower occupation rate in the back seats compared to the front seats, the number of persons sustaining abdominal injuries at the rear place is higher than in the front place. In recent cars, the risk of having a serious or fatal abdominal injury in a frontal impact is 1.6% for the driver, 3.6% for the front passenger and 6.3% for the rear occupants. The most frequently hurt organs are the small intestine (17%), the spleen (16%) and the liver (13%). The most common countermeasures have a good efficiency in the reduction of the abdominal injuries for the adults: the stiffness of the structure of the seats allows decreasing the abdominal injury risk from 54% (driver) to 60% (front occupant), the seatbelt pretensioners decrease also this risk from 90% (driver) to 83% (front passenger).
This work describes the results of the experimental activity, illustrating the driving behavior observed in different conditions, relating them to the different methods of ADAS intervention and comparing the driver behavior without ADAS. In the present study, driver behavior was studied in road accidents involving elderly pedestrians, with different ADAS HMIs, as a base to develop a driver model in near missing pedestrian accidents. A literature research was conducted with the aim of finding out the main influencing factors, including environment, boundary conditions, configuration of impact, pedestrian and driver information, when pedestrian fatalities occur and an analysis of frequent road accidents was conducted to get more detailed information about the driver- behavior. In order to obtain more detailed information about pedestrian accidents, real road accidents were reconstructed with multibody simulations on PC-Crash and, by the comparison between literature findings and reconstructions, a generic accident scenario was defined. The generic accident scenario was implemented on the full scale dynamic driving simulator in use at the Laboratory for Safety and Traffic Accident Analysis (LaSIS, University of Florence, Italy) in order to analyse the driving behaviors of volunteers, also considering the influence of ADAS devices. Forty-five young volunteers were enrolled for this study, resulting in forty valid tests on different testing scenarios. Two different scenarios consisted in driving with or without ADAS in the vehicle. Different kinds of ADAS, acoustic and optical, with different time of intervention were tested in order to study the different reactions of the driver. The tests showed some interesting differences between driver's behavior when approaching the critical situation. Drivers with ADAS reacted earlier, but more slowly, depending also on the type of alarm, and often with double reaction when braking. In fact, the results of the activity showed that with ADAS intervention the time to collision (TTC) increases, but the reaction time and braking modality change: a) there is a sort of "latency" time between the accelerator pedal release and the brake pressure; b) the brake pressure is initially less intense. So the driver only partially takes advance from the TTC increase. These differences were valued not only qualitatively, but quantitatively as well. This work revealed to be useful to improve the knowledge of drivers" behavior, in order to realize a driver model that can be implemented to help attaining and assessing higher levels of automation through new technology.
From an automotive safety occupant protection standpoint, effective occupant restraint requires a system capable of providing non-injurious occupant ride down of anticipated crash forces. This is not only the case for frontal collisions, where occupant restraint is provided primarily by seatbelts and airbags, but is also critical for other crash modes such as side impacts, rear impacts, rollovers, as well as multiple impact events. In the rear impact crash mode, occupant restraint is provided primarily by the seatbacks and to some extent the seatbelts. Foundationally, therefore, what becomes fundamental to the seatback's role in rear occupant protection is its ability to contain the occupant within the seat, preventing occupant ramping, as well as preventing the seat's, and/or its occupant's, dangerous intrusion into the rear occupant's survival space where contact with rear compartment components and/ or rear seated occupants can present a significant injury risk. An analysis is presented of a series of rear impact sled testing conducted by the authors that evaluates the timing, position and extent of the front seatback's reward displacement toward and into the rear occupant compartment as well as consideration of the front seat occupant' ramping potential and its injury potential relative to the rear compartment. Additionally, three other series of testing are presented which assess various seat designs occupant retention capabilities. Lastly, a matched-pair comparison test series is presented which evaluates occupant motion in rear impact with and without use of a typical vehicle body mounted 3-point seatbelt. Discussion of restraint system performance observed in all the testing is included along with ATD biofidelity and thigh-gap considerations. The data collected and presented includes accelerometer instrumentation and high speed video analysis.
Twenty-eight percent of traffic accidents in Japan are rear-end collisions, and of these, 13% are multiple collisions (three or more vehicles and/or roadside objects). A post-crash braking system enables the driver to stop the vehicle in a short distance after a rear-end collision to prevent secondary collisions. In this study, the effectiveness of a post-crash braking system was examined using a drive recorder database. In 64% of rear-end collisions, the driver's braking was interrupted after the collision. The stopping distance was estimated with time data from the drive recorder. We predict that the brake assist would be effective in preventing secondary collisions in 21% of cases.
This study investigates the protection offered by passive head-restraints with different stiffness and energy dissipation properties. For this purpose, computational multi-body models of a generic car seat and a biofidelic 50thpercentile male human for rear impact are used to study different seat designs and passive head-restraints. The validated seat-occupant model is also used in the design of two different car-seat models which are shown to effectively mitigate whiplash by utilising a crash-energy distribution technique. Five different passive head-restraints with varying stiffness (low-medium-high) and energy dissipation percentages (low-high) are successively attached to four different car-seat models. The simulation results indicate that the protection offered by head restraints is strongly dependent on the seat design. It has also been shown that the stiffness of the passive head-restraint has much more influence on whiplash-risk in comparison to its energy dissipation capacity.
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection based on developments by the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) have been introduced in world-wide regulations and consumer test programmes, with considerable harmonization between these programmes. Nevertheless, latest accident investigations reveal a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads running the risk of not meeting the European Union- goal of halving the number of road fatalities by the year 2020. The branch of external road user safety within the EC-funded research project SENIORS under the HORIZON 2020 framework programme focuses on investigating the benefit of modifications to pedestrian test and assessment procedures and their impactors for vulnerable road users with focus on the elderly. Injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists derived from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) show a trend of AIS 2+ and AIS 3+ injuries getting more relevant for the thorax region in crashes with newer cars (Wisch et al., 2017), while maintaining the relevance for head and lower extremities. Several crash databases from Europe such as GIDAS and the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition (STRADA) also show that head, thorax and lower extremities are the key affected body regions not only for the average population but in particular for the elderly. Therefore, the SENIORS project is focusing on an improvement of currently available impactors and procedures in terms of biofidelity and injury assessment ability towards a better protection of the affected body regions, incorporating previous results from FP 6 project APROSYS and subsequent studies carried out by BASt. The paper describes the overall methodology to develop revised FE impactor models. Matched human body model and impactor simulations against generic test rigs provide transfer functions that will be used for the derivation of impactor criteria from human injury risk functions for the affected body regions. In a later step, the refined impactors will be validated by simulations against actual vehicle front-ends. Prototyping and adaptation of test and assessment procedures as well as an impact assessment will conclude the work of the project at the final stage. The work will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users focusing on the elderly. The use of advanced human body models to develop applicable assessment criteria for the revised impactors is intended to cope with the paucity of actual biomechanical data focusing on elderly pedestrians. In order to achieve optimized results in the future, the improved test methods need to be implemented within an integrated approach, combining active with passive safety measures. In order to address the developments in road accidents and injury patterns of vulnerable road users, established test and assessment procedures need to be continuously verified and, where needed, to be revised. The demographic change as well as changes in the vehicle fleet, leading to a variation of accident scenarios, injury frequencies and injury patterns of vulnerable road users are addressed by the work provided by the SENIORS project, introducing updated impactors for pedestrian test and assessment procedures.
Supported by field accident data and monitoring results of European Regulation (EC) No. 78/2009, recent plans of the European Commission regarding a way forward to improve passive safety of vulnerable road users include, amongst other things, an extension of the head test area. The inclusion of passive cyclist safety is also being considered by Euro NCAP. Although passenger car to cyclist collisions are often severe and have a significant share within the accident statistics, cyclists are neither considered sufficiently in the legislative nor in the consumer ratings tests. Therefore, a test procedure to assess the protection potential of vehicle fronts in a collision with cyclists has been developed within a current research project. For this purpose, the existing pedestrian head impact test procedures were modified in order to include boundary conditions relevant for cyclists as the second big group of vulnerable road users. Based on an in-depth analysis of passenger car to cyclist accidents in Germany the three most representative accident constellations have been initially defined. The development of the test procedure itself was based on corresponding simulations with representative vehicle and bicycle models. In addition to different cyclist heights, reaching from a 6-year-old child to a 95%-male, also four pedal positions were considered. By reconstruction of a real accident the defined simulation parameters could be validated in advance. The conducted accident kinematics analysis shows for a large portion of the constellations an increased head impact area, which can reach beyond the roof leading edge, as well as high average values for head impact velocity and angle. Based on the simulation data obtained for the different vehicle models, cyclist-specific test parameters for impactor tests have been derived, which have been further examined in the course of head and leg impact tests. In order to study the cyclist accident kinematics under real test conditions, different full scale tests with a Polar-II dummy positioned on a bicycle have been conducted. Overall, the tests showed a good correlation with the simulations and support the defined boundary test conditions. Typical accident scenarios and simulations reveal higher head impact locations, angles and velocities. An extended head impact area with modified test parameters will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users including cyclists. However, due to significantly differing impact kinematics and postures between the lower extremities of pedestrians and cyclists, these injuries cannot be addressed by the means of current test tools such as the flexible pedestrian legform impactor FlexPLI. Based on the findings obtained within the project as well as the existing pedestrian protection requirements a cyclist protection test procedure for use in legislation and consumer test programmes has been developed, whose requirements have been transferred into a corresponding test specification. This specification provides common head test boundary conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, whereby the existing requirements are modified and two parallel test procedures are avoided.
Neue Herausforderungen an die Unfallforschung durch Fahrerassistenz und automatisiertes Fahren
(2019)
Unfallrekonstruktion hat die Ableitung von Maßnahmen zur Minimierung der Unfallfolgen ermöglicht, vor allem durch Verbesserungen bei passiven Sicherheitseinrichtungen, aber auch durch die Verbesserung der Rettungskette, beispielsweise eCall. Heute können aktive Sicherheitssysteme die Unfallfolgen bereits vor der eigentlichen Kollision reduzieren oder durch Umfeldwahrnehmung und mittels Eingriff in die Fahrzeugsteuerung gegebenenfalls sogar vollständig verhindern. Funktionen, die aktiv in die Fahrzeugsteuerung eingreifen, lassen sich nach ihrer Wirkweise unterscheiden: zum einen handelt es sich um kontinuierlich automatisierende Funktionen, die meist länger aktiv bleiben (zum Beispiel ACC). Zum anderen um Funktionen, die in kritischen Fahrsituationen temporär in die Fahrzeugsteuerung eingreifen. Aufgezeigt wird, welche Konsequenzen und Risiken in Bezug auf diese Systeme sowie für bestimmte (zum Beispiel kritikale) Fahrsituationen anzunehmen sind. Zur Bewertung von aktiven Reglern, die in kritischen Fahrsituationen eingreifen, sind Unfalldaten nur noch eingeschränkt tauglich. Ähnliches gilt für die Bewertung von Ereignissen/ Zuständen im Rahmen kontinuierlicher Fahrzeugsteuerung, vor allem, wenn diese weiter vorausliegen. Wirkzusammenhänge automatisierter Fahrfunktionen müssen jedoch - gerade für den Mischverkehr mit konventionell gesteuerten Fahrzeugen - identifiziert werden. Dafür wird eine Szenariendatenbank mit relevanten Verkehrssituationen benötigt, in die Daten aus Naturalistic Driving Studies (NDS), aus Fahrversuchen oder Versuchen im Fahrsimulator eingehen können. Die zunehmende Durchdringung der Fahrzeugflotte mit kontinuierlich automatisierten Fahrfunktionen lässt eine Abnahme kritischer Fahrsituationen und eine Reduktion der Zahl der Verkehrsopfer erwarten. Allerdings verbleibt eine Restzahl an systemimmanenten Unfällen, die als unvermeidbar gelten müssen.