91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (64) (entfernen)
Sprache
- Englisch (64) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Anfahrversuch (23)
- Conference (23)
- Impact test (veh) (22)
- Konferenz (22)
- Bewertung (19)
- Evaluation (assessment) (19)
- Test method (19)
- Prüfverfahren (18)
- Fußgänger (17)
- Pedestrian (17)
- Safety (17)
- Sicherheit (17)
- Anthropometric dummy (16)
- Dummy (16)
- Accident (13)
- Collision (13)
- Unfall (13)
- Fahrzeug (12)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (11)
- Simulation (11)
- Vehicle (11)
- Zusammenstoß (11)
- Head on collision (10)
- Analyse (math) (9)
- Analysis (math) (9)
- Deutschland (9)
- Germany (9)
- Biomechanics (8)
- Biomechanik (8)
- Car (8)
- Child (8)
- Kind (8)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (8)
- Europa (7)
- Europe (7)
- Kompatibilität (7)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (7)
- Radfahrer (7)
- Severity (accid, injury) (7)
- Bemessung (6)
- Compatibility (6)
- Cyclist (6)
- Design (overall design) (6)
- Forschungsarbeit (6)
- Passive safety system (6)
- Pkw (6)
- Research project (6)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (6)
- Severity (accid (6)
- Side impact (6)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (6)
- Vehicle regulations (6)
- injury) (6)
- Active safety system (5)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (5)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (5)
- Driver assistance system (5)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (5)
- Improvement (5)
- Injury (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Standardisierung (5)
- Verbesserung (5)
- Verletzung (5)
- Verletzung) (5)
- Automatic (4)
- Automatisch (4)
- Autonomes Fahren (4)
- Autonomous driving (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Cost benefit analysis (4)
- Fahrstabilität (4)
- Head (4)
- Insasse (4)
- Kopf (4)
- Modification (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (4)
- Test (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Vehicle handling (4)
- Vehicle occupant (4)
- Versuch (4)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (4)
- Accident prevention (3)
- Alte Leute (3)
- Aufprallschlitten (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Body (car) (3)
- Collision avoidance system (3)
- Datenbank (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Deformation (3)
- Driver (3)
- EU (3)
- Efficiency (3)
- Error (3)
- Fahrer (3)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (3)
- Fahrzeugsitz (3)
- Fehler (3)
- Gesetzgebung (3)
- Human body (3)
- Impact sled (3)
- Interior (veh) (3)
- Karosserie (3)
- Knie (menschl) (3)
- Leg (human) (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (3)
- Lkw (3)
- Lorry (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Motorcycle (3)
- Motorrad (3)
- Official approval (3)
- Safety belt (3)
- Seat (veh) (3)
- Sicherheitsgurt (3)
- Standardization (3)
- Unfallverhütung (3)
- Use (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Airbag (2)
- Antikollisionssystem (2)
- Ausrüstung (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Behaviour (2)
- Belastung (2)
- Braking (2)
- Bremsung (2)
- Cause (2)
- Database (2)
- Decrease (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Development (2)
- Empfindlichkeit (2)
- Entwicklung (2)
- Equipment (2)
- Forecast (2)
- Front (2)
- Gewicht (2)
- Headlamp (2)
- Impact test (2)
- Knie (2)
- Kraftfahrzeug (2)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (2)
- Load (2)
- Mathematical model (2)
- Measurement (2)
- Messung (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- Old people (2)
- Prevention (2)
- Prognose (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Rechenmodell (2)
- Scheinwerfer (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Sensitivity (2)
- Sensor (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Steering (process) (2)
- Technologie (2)
- Technology (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unterfahrschutz (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (2)
- Verformung (2)
- Verhalten (2)
- Verminderung (2)
- Weight (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- Abdomen (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Accident reconstruction (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anti locking device (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Baumusterzulassung (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Bildschirm (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Bus (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Classification (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Compression (1)
- Construction (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crash Test (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Datenerfassung (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Durability (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Ergonomics (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Failure (1)
- Fatality (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- Form (1)
- Frau (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Geschwindigkeit (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Impact study (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- Intelligent transport system (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- International (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Kamera (1)
- Klassifizierung (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kunststoff (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Leuchtdichte (1)
- Limit (1)
- Luminance (1)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (1)
- Messgerät (1)
- Method (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nacht (1)
- Night (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Perception (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Plastic material (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Rear (1)
- Rear view mirror (1)
- Reflectorized material (1)
- Reflexstoffe (1)
- Reifen (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Risiko (1)
- Risk (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Rückspiegel (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Sichtbarkeit (1)
- Side (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Speed (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Statistics (1)
- Statistik (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Train (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- Tyre (1)
- Tödlicher Unfall (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Unterleib (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Verfahren (1)
- Verhütung (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Sichtbarkeit (1)
- Visual display (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Wahrnehmung (1)
- Windschutzscheibe (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zulassung (tech) (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (64) (entfernen)
The objective was to develop and validate a crash trolley (reference vehicle) equipped with a compartment and a full restraint system for driver and front seat passenger which can be used in full scale crash testing. Furthermore, the crash trolley should have a suspension to show rotation and nick effects similar to real vehicles. Within the development phase the reference vehicle was build based on a European family car. Special attention was needed to provide appropriate strength to the trolley and its suspension. The reference vehicle is equipped with a restraint system consisting of airbags, pedals, seats, dashboard, and windscreen. On the front of the vehicle different crash barriers can be installed to provide miscellaneous deceleration pulses. For the validation phase a series of low and high speed crash tests with HIII dummies were conducted and compared with full scale tests. For the comparison deceleration pulse, dummy numbers and vehicle movement were analyzed. Validation tests with velocities up to 60 km/h showed promising results. The compartment and the suspension systems stayed stable. Rotation effects were comparable with full scale car crash tests. The airbags and seat belt system worked reasonable. The acceleration pulse compared to an Euro NCAP test had a similar characteristic but was in general slightly lower. After the successful validation the reference vehicle is already in use in different studies in the field of vehicle safety research at BASt.
In the European Project FIMCAR, a proposal for a frontal impact test configuration was developed which included an additional full width deformable barrier (FWDB) test. Motivation for the deformable element was partly to measure structural forces as well as to produce a severe crash pulse different from that in the offset test. The objective of this study was to analyze the safety performance of vehicles in the full width rigid barrier test (FWRB) and in the full width deformable barrier test (FWDB). In total, 12 vehicles were crashed in both configurations. Comparison of these tests to real world accident data was used to identify the crash barrier most representative of real world crashes. For all vehicles, the airbag visible times were later in the FWDB configuration. This was attributed to the attenuation of the initial acceleration peak, observed in FWRB tests, by the addition of the deformable element. These findings were in alignment with airbag triggering times seen in real world crash data. Also, the dummy loadings were slightly worse in FWDB compared to FWRB tests, which is possibly linked to the airbag firing and a more realistic loading of the vehicle crash structures in the FWDB configuration. Evaluations of the lower extremities have shown a general increasing of the tibia index with the crash pulse severity.
Advancing active safety towards the protection of vulnerable road users: the PROSPECT project
(2017)
Accidents involving Vulnerable Road Users (VRU) are still a very significant issue for road safety. According to the World Health Organisation, pedestrian and cyclist deaths account for more than 25% of all road traffic deaths worldwide. Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems have the potential to improve safety for these VRU groups. The PROSPECT project (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) aims to significantly improve the effectiveness of active VRU safety systems compared to those currently on the market by expanding the scope of scenarios addressed by the systems and improving the overall system performance. The project pursues an integrated approach: Newest available accident data combined with naturalistic observations and HMI guidelines represent key inputs for the system specifications, which form the basis for the system development. For system development, two main aspects are considered: advanced sensor processing with situation analysis, and intervention strategies including braking and steering. All these concepts are implemented in several vehicle prototypes. Special emphasis is put on balancing system performance in critical scenarios and avoiding undesired system activations. For system validation, testing in realistic scenarios will be done. Results will allow the performance assessment of the developed concepts and a cost-benefit analysis. The findings within the PROSPECT project will contribute to the generation of state -of-the-art knowledge, technical innovations, assessment methodologies and tools for advancing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems towards the protection of VRUs. The introduction of a new generation safety system in the market will enhance VRU road safety in 2020-2025, contributing to the "Vision Zero" objective of no fatalities or serious injuries in road traffic set out in the Transport White Paper. Furthermore, the test methodologies and tools developed within the project shall be considered for the New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) future roadmaps, supporting the European Commission goal of halving the road toll in the 2011-2020 timeframe.
According to the German road traffic regulations children up to the age of 12 or a height below 150 cm have to use approved and appropriate child restraint systems (CRS). CRS must be approved according to UN-ECE Regulation No. 44. The regulation classifies CRS in 5 weight categories. The upper weight group is approved for children from 22 to 36 kg. However, studies show that already today many children weigh more than 36 kg although they have not reached a height of 150 cm. Therefore, no ECE R44 approved CRS is available for these overweight children. In conclusion, today's sizes and weights of children are no longer represented by the current version of the ECE R44. The heaviest used dummy (P10) weighs just 32.6 kg and has a height of 137.9 cm. Statistical data of German children show that already 5% of the children at a height of 137.9 cm have a weight above 45.3 kg. Regarding children at a height of 145 cm, the 95th percentile limit is at a weight of 53.3 kg. Based on these data 4 dummies with different heights and weights were defined and produced. Two of them are overweight. Up to now, there is no experience how current child restraint systems perform in a car crash if they are used by children with a weight above 36 kg and a height smaller than 150 cm. In the future, different child restraint systems will be tested with respect to the ECE R44 regulation using these overweight dummies.
The UN Regulation No. 79 is going to be amended to allow automatically commanded steering functions (ACSF) at speeds above 10 km/h. Hence, requirements concerning the approval of automatically performed steering manoeuvres have to be set in order to allow safe use of automatic steering on public roads as well as improve overall road safety for the driver and the surroundings. By order of the German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI), BASt developed and verified physical test procedures for automatic steering to be implemented in UN Regulation No. 79. The usability of currently available test tools was examined. The paper at hand describes these test procedures and presents results from verification tests. The designated tests are divided in three sections: functionality tests, verifications for the transition of control and emergency tests. System functionality tests are auto matic lane keeping, automatic lane change and an automatic abort of an initiated lane change due to traffic. Those tests check if the vehicle remains in its lane (under normal operating conditions), is able to perform safe automatic lane change manoeuvres and if it considers other road users during its manoeuvres. Transition tests examine the vehicle's behaviour when the driver fails to monitor the system and in situations when the system has to hand over the steering control back to the driver. For instance these tests provoke driver-in-the-loop requests by approaching system boundary limitations, like missing lane markings, surpassing maximum lateral acceleration in a bend or even a major system failure. Even further the driver and his inputs are monitored and if the system detects that he is overriding system actions or contrary want to quit the driving task and unfastens the seat belt, it has to shut down and put the human back into manually control and the responsibility of driving. The last series of test consists of two emergency situations in which the system has to react to a time critical event: A hard decelerating vehicle and a stationary vehicle in front both with no lane change possibility for the ACSF vehicle. Some of the tests, especially the emergency manoeuvres, require special target vehicles and propulsion systems. Since no fully automatic steering vehicles are available, a current Mercedes E-Class with Mercedes' "drive pilot" system was used. It was shown that the vehicle is automatically able to brake to a full stop towards a static Euro NCAP target from partial-automatic driving at 90 km/h, that it could brake towards a rapidly decelerating lead vehicle when travelling at 70 km/h, that it was able during partially automatic driving to remain in its lane in normal operation conditions and to perform a automatic (driver initiated) lane change while surveilling the driver- activities.
Regarding to the German road traffic licensing regulations it is mandatory to have a light system using a bicycle in public traffic. All attached components must be approved. The admission requires additional restrictions such as a dynamo as energy source with a nominal voltage of 6 V. Batteries are only allowed in addition to this. To adopt the German bicycle regulation to the state of art of an energy efficient lighting, additional power sources such as a battery respectively rechargeable batterie should be evaluated. The project will propose amendments for German Road Traffic Regulations and technical requirements.
The head impact of pedestrians in the windscreen area shows a high relevance in real-world accidents. Nevertheless, there are neither biomechanical limits nor elaborated testing procedures available. Furthermore, the development of deployable protection systems like pop-up bonnets or external airbags has made faster progress than the corresponding testing methods. New requirements which are currently not considered are taken into account within a research project of BASt and the EC funded APROSYS (Advanced PROtection SYStems) integrated project relating to passive pedestrian protection. Testing procedures for head impact in the windscreen area should address these new boundary conditions. The presented modular procedure combines the advantages of virtual testing, including full-scale multi-body and finite element simulations, as well as hardware testing containing impactor tests based on the existing procedures of EEVC WG 17. To meet the efforts of harmonization in legislation, it refers to the Global Technical Regulation of UNECE (GTR No. 9). The basis for this combined hardware and virtual testing procedure is a robust categorization covering all passenger cars and light commercial vehicles and defining the testing zone including the related kinematics. The virtual testing part supports also the choice of the impact points for the hardware test and determines head impact timing for testing deployable systems. The assessment of the neck rotation angle and sharp edge contact in the rear gap of pop-up bonnets is included. For the demonstration of this procedure, a hardware sedan shaped vehicle was modified by integrating an airbag system. In addition, tests with the Honda Polar-II Dummy were performed for an evaluation of the new testing procedure. Comparing these results, it was concluded that a combination of simulation and updated subsystem tests forms an important step towards enhanced future pedestrian safety systems considering the windscreen area and the deployable systems.
Side-impact safety of passenger cars is assessed in Europe in a full-scale test using a moving barrier. The front of this barrier is deformable and represents the stiffness of an 'average' car. The EU Directive 96/27/EC on side impact protection has adopted the EEVC Side Impact Test Procedure, including the original performance specification for the barrier face when impacting a flat dynamometric rigid wall. The requirements of the deformable barrier face, as laid down in the Directive, are related to geometrical characteristics, deformation characteristics and energy dissipation figures. Due to these limited requirements, many variations are possible in designing a deformable barrier face. As a result, several barrier face designs are in the market. However, research institutes and car manufacturers report significant difference in test results when using these different devices. It appears that the present approval test is not able to distinguish between the different designs that may perform differently when they impact real vehicles. Therefore, EEVC Working Group 13 has developed a number of tests to evaluate the different designs. In these tests the barrier faces are loaded and deformed in a specific and/or more representative way. Barrier faces of different design have been evaluated. In the paper the set-up and the reasoning behind the tests is presented. Results showing specific differences in performance are demonstrated.
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe (EU27) is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car's safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EU-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car's frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation. This paper reports the cost benefit analyses performed to estimate the effect of the following potential changes to the frontal impact regulation: • Option 1 " No change and allow current measures to propagate throughout the vehicle fleet. • Option 2 " Add a full width test to the current offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) test. • Option 3 " Add a full width test and replace the current ODB test with a Progressive Deformable Barrier (PDB) test. For the analyses national data were used from Great Britain (STATS 19) and from Germany (German Federal Statistical Office). In addition in-depth real word crash data were used from CCIS (Great Britain) and GIDAS (Germany). To estimate the benefit a generalised linear model, an injury reduction model and a matched pairs modelling approach were applied. The benefits were estimated to be: for Option 1 "No change" about 2.0%; for Option 2 "FW test" ranging from 5 to 12% and for Option 3 "FW and PDB tests" 9 to 14% of car occupant killed and seriously injured casualties.
Thoracic injury is one of the predominant types of severe injuries in frontal accidents. The assessment of the injury risk to the thorax in the current frontal impact test procedures is based on the uni-axial chest deflection measured in the dummy Hybrid III. Several studies have shown that criteria based on the linear chest potentiometer are not sensitive enough to distinguish between different restraint systems, and cannot indicate asymmetric chest loading, which has been shown to correlate to increased injury risk. Furthermore, the measurement is sensitive to belt position on the dummy chest. The objective of this study was to evaluate the optical multipoint chest deflection measurement system "RibEye" in frontal impact sled tests. Therefore the sensitivity of the RibEyesystem to different restraint system parameters was investigated. Furthermore, the issue of signal drop out at the 6 th rib was investigated in this study.A series of sled tests were conducted with the RibEye system in the Hybrid III 50%. The sled environment consisted of a rigid seat and a standard production three-point seat belt system. Rib deflections were recorded with the RibEye system and additionally with the standard chest potentiometer. The tests were carried out at crash pulses of two different velocities (30 km/h and 64 km/h). The tests were conducted with different belt routing to investigate the sensitivity of chest deflection measurements to belt position on the dummy chest. Furthermore, different restraint system parameters were investigated (force limiter level, with or without pretensioning) to evaluate if the RibEye measurements provide additional information to distinguish between restraint system configurations . The results showed that with the RibEye system it was possible to identify the effect of belt routing in more detail. The chest deflections measured with the standard chest potentiometer as well as the maximum deflection measured by RibEye allowed the distinction to be made between different force limiter levels. The RibEye system was also able to clearly show the asymmetric deflection of the rib cage due to belt loading. In some configurations, differences of more than 15 mm were observed between the left and side areas of the chest. Furthermore, the abdomen insert was identified as source of the problem of signal drop out at the 6th rib. Possible solutions are discussed. In conclusion, the RibEye system provided valuable additional information regarding the assessment of restraint systems. It has the potential to enable the evaluation of thoracic injury risk due to asymmetric loading. Further investigations with the RibEye should be extended to tests in a vehicle environment, which include a vehicle seat and other restraint system components such as an airbag.