91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (82)
- Buch (Monographie) (35)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (16)
- Arbeitspapier (12)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (5)
Schlagworte
- Safety (67)
- Sicherheit (66)
- Fahrzeug (50)
- Vehicle (50)
- Bewertung (43)
- Anfahrversuch (39)
- Evaluation (assessment) (39)
- Impact test (veh) (36)
- Deutschland (35)
- Germany (35)
- Test method (34)
- Prüfverfahren (33)
- Versuch (31)
- Test (30)
- Conference (28)
- Fußgänger (28)
- Pedestrian (28)
- Konferenz (27)
- Car (22)
- Forschungsbericht (22)
- Unfall (22)
- Research report (21)
- Accident (20)
- Collision (19)
- Pkw (19)
- Anthropometric dummy (18)
- Driver assistance system (17)
- Dummy (17)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (17)
- Kompatibilität (17)
- Zusammenstoß (17)
- Compatibility (16)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (16)
- Simulation (16)
- Gesetzgebung (15)
- Head on collision (15)
- Legislation (15)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (15)
- Method (14)
- Passive safety system (14)
- Verfahren (14)
- Child (12)
- Injury (12)
- Kind (12)
- Verletzung (12)
- Analyse (math) (11)
- Analysis (math) (11)
- Improvement (11)
- Schlag (11)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (11)
- Shock (11)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (11)
- Unfallverhütung (11)
- Vehicle regulations (11)
- Verbesserung (11)
- Accident prevention (10)
- Automatic (10)
- Automatisch (10)
- Development (10)
- Entwicklung (10)
- Fahrzeugführung (10)
- Prevention (10)
- Radfahrer (10)
- Research project (10)
- Severity (accid, injury) (10)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (10)
- Active safety system (9)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (9)
- Ausrüstung (9)
- Autonomes Fahren (9)
- Autonomous driving (9)
- Biomechanics (9)
- Biomechanik (9)
- Cost benefit analysis (9)
- Driver information (9)
- EU (9)
- Elektronische Fahrhilfe (9)
- Equipment (9)
- Ergonomics (9)
- Europa (9)
- Europe (9)
- Fahrerinformation (9)
- Fahrstabilität (9)
- Forschungsarbeit (9)
- Head (9)
- Kopf (9)
- Motorcycle (9)
- Motorrad (9)
- Technologie (9)
- Technology (9)
- Vehicle handling (9)
- Cyclist (8)
- Driving (veh) (8)
- Electronic driving aid (8)
- Insasse (8)
- Lkw (8)
- Lorry (8)
- Messung (8)
- Severity (accid (8)
- Standardisierung (8)
- Vehicle occupant (8)
- injury) (8)
- Bemessung (7)
- Bremsung (7)
- Decrease (7)
- Design (overall design) (7)
- Driver (7)
- Efficiency (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (7)
- Measurement (7)
- Perception (7)
- Reifen (7)
- Safety belt (7)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (7)
- Sicherheitsgurt (7)
- Side impact (7)
- Tyre (7)
- Verhütung (7)
- Verletzung) (7)
- Verminderung (7)
- Wahrnehmung (7)
- Braking (6)
- Collision avoidance system (6)
- Deformation (6)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (6)
- Ergonomie (6)
- Geschwindigkeit (6)
- Impact test (6)
- Knee (human) (6)
- Prüfstand (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (6)
- Speed (6)
- Standardization (6)
- Statistik (6)
- Test rig (6)
- Antikollisionssystem (5)
- Aufprallschlitten (5)
- Belastung (5)
- Brustkorb (5)
- Communication (5)
- Electric vehicle (5)
- Elektrofahrzeug (5)
- Error (5)
- Fehler (5)
- Fuel consumption (5)
- Gewicht (5)
- Human body (5)
- Impact sled (5)
- Kommunikation (5)
- Kraftstoffverbrauch (5)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (5)
- Load (5)
- Official approval (5)
- Risiko (5)
- Risk (5)
- Steering (process) (5)
- Thorax (5)
- Verformung (5)
- Warning (5)
- Weight (5)
- Accident rate (4)
- Airbag (4)
- Auffahrunfall (4)
- Bein (menschl) (4)
- Body (car) (4)
- Brennstoffzelle (4)
- Datenbank (4)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (4)
- Emission (4)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (4)
- Fahrzeugsitz (4)
- Fuel cell (4)
- Headlamp (4)
- Hybrid vehicle (4)
- Hybridfahrzeug (4)
- Interior (veh) (4)
- Karosserie (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Layout (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Market (4)
- Markt (4)
- Menschlicher Körper (4)
- Modification (4)
- Nachfrage (4)
- Norm (tech) (4)
- Rear end collision (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Richtlinien (4)
- Scheinwerfer (4)
- Seat (veh) (4)
- Sensor (4)
- Specification (standard) (4)
- Specifications (4)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (4)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (4)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (3)
- Adaptive cruise control (3)
- Air bag (restraint system) (3)
- Aktive Sicherheit (3)
- Alte Leute (3)
- Antrieb (tech) (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Bicycle (3)
- Bildschirm (3)
- Brake light (3)
- Bremslicht (3)
- Bruch (mech) (3)
- Database (3)
- Daylight (3)
- Demand (3)
- Emergency (3)
- Fahrrad (3)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (3)
- Failure (3)
- Fatality (3)
- Gestaltung (3)
- Haftung (jur) (3)
- Increase (3)
- Industrie (3)
- Industry (3)
- Intelligent transport system (3)
- Kamera (3)
- Kraftfahrzeug (3)
- Leuchtdichte (3)
- Liability (3)
- Luminance (3)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (3)
- Messgerät (3)
- Notfall (3)
- Oberfläche (3)
- Propulsion (3)
- Prototyp (3)
- Prototype (3)
- Rear view mirror (3)
- Road user (3)
- Rückspiegel (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Surface (3)
- Tageslicht (3)
- Traffic regulations (3)
- Tödlicher Unfall (3)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (3)
- Unterfahrschutz (3)
- Use (3)
- Vehicle inspection (3)
- Vehicle lighting (3)
- Vergrößerung (3)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Visual display (3)
- Warnung (3)
- Windschutzscheibe (3)
- Windscreen (veh) (3)
- Abblendlicht (2)
- Active safety (2)
- Adult (2)
- Ankündigung (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Apparatus (measuring) (2)
- Autobahn (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Baumusterzulassung (2)
- Behaviour (2)
- Bicyclist (2)
- Blind spot (veh) (2)
- Bumper (2)
- Camera (2)
- Carriageway (2)
- Cause (2)
- Classification (2)
- Comfort (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Crashtest (2)
- Data acquisition (2)
- Datenerfassung (2)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (2)
- Decke (Straße) (2)
- Delivery vehicle (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Dipped headlight (2)
- Durability (2)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (2)
- Empfindlichkeit (2)
- Erwachsener (2)
- Evaluation (2)
- Fahrbahn (2)
- Fahrleistung (2)
- Fahrzeugteile (2)
- Forecast (2)
- Freight transport (2)
- Front (2)
- Future transport mode (2)
- Gütertransport (2)
- Highway (2)
- Hinten (2)
- Impact study (2)
- Individueller Verkehr (2)
- Information (2)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (2)
- International (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Knotenpunkt (2)
- Komfort (2)
- Kontakt Reifen-Straße (2)
- Kunststoff (2)
- Landstraße (2)
- Mathematical model (2)
- Motorway (2)
- Nacht (2)
- Night (2)
- Old people (2)
- Optimum (2)
- Plastic material (2)
- Private transport (2)
- Prognose (2)
- Rear (2)
- Rechenmodell (2)
- Reconstruction (accid) (2)
- Road traffic (2)
- Rolling resistance (2)
- Rollwiderstand (2)
- Safety glass (2)
- Sample (mater) (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Sensitivity (2)
- Sicherheitsglas (2)
- Sichtbarkeit (2)
- Stoßstange (2)
- Straße (2)
- Straßenverkehr (2)
- Surfacing (2)
- Technische Überwachung (Fahrzeug) (2)
- Toter Winkel (2)
- Traffic (2)
- Traffic control (2)
- Transport infrastructure (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vehicle mile (2)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (2)
- Verhalten (2)
- Verkehr (2)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (2)
- Verkehrssteuerung (2)
- Versuchspuppe (2)
- Sichtbarkeit (2)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (2)
- Zulassung (tech) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- Abbiegen (1)
- Abdomen (1)
- Accident data (1)
- Accident proneness (1)
- Accident reconstruction (1)
- Achslast (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Alternative Energie (1)
- Alternative energy (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anhänger (1)
- Anordnung (1)
- Anthropometric body (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Aquaplaning (1)
- Arbeitsgruppe (1)
- Armaturenbrett (1)
- Articulated vehicle (1)
- Auspuff (1)
- Axle load (1)
- Ballungsgebiet (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Bearing capacity (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Benefit cost analysis (1)
- Betriebsverhalten (1)
- Blendung (1)
- Bonnet (car) (1)
- Brake (1)
- Breaking (1)
- Breite (1)
- Bremse (1)
- Bridge (1)
- Brücke (1)
- Bus (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Carbon monoxide (1)
- Catalysis (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Colour (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Components of the car (1)
- Components of the vehicle (1)
- Compression (1)
- Construction (1)
- Contact (Tyre road) (1)
- Contact (tyre road) (1)
- Control (1)
- Conurbation (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Corrosion (1)
- Crash helmet (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Damage (1)
- Dashboard (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Data processing (1)
- Data security (1)
- Data transmission (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Datenverarbeitung (1)
- Datenübertragung (telekom) (1)
- Daytime running light (1)
- Deceleration (1)
- Deckschicht (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Demand (econ) (1)
- Demographie (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Disabled person (1)
- Dispersion (stat) (1)
- Driving (1)
- Druck (1)
- Dynamic penetration test (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- EU directive (1)
- EU-Richtlinie (1)
- Echtzeit (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Electrode (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elekronic stability program (1)
- Elektrode (1)
- Emission control (1)
- Emissionskontrolle (1)
- Energieeinsparung (1)
- Energy conservation (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Environment (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Evaluation (Assessment) (1)
- Exhaust pipe (1)
- Expert system (1)
- Expertensystem (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrbare Barriere (1)
- Fahrstreifen (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugabstand (1)
- Farbe (1)
- Federung (1)
- Fernverkehrsstraße (1)
- Festigkeit (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Feuerlöscher (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- Fire extinguisher (1)
- Force (1)
- Form (1)
- France (1)
- Frankreich (1)
- Frau (1)
- Fuel (1)
- Gebraucht (1)
- Gelenkfahrzeug (1)
- Gelände (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Gierverhalten (1)
- Glare (1)
- Goods traffic (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Güterverkehr (1)
- Harmonisation (1)
- Harmonisierung (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Hell (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Hydrocarbon (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- In service behaviour (1)
- In situ (1)
- Information documentation (1)
- Information management (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interactive model (1)
- Interaktives Modell (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Junction (1)
- Katalyse (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Kohlenmonoxid (1)
- Kohlenwasserstoff (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontrolle (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Korrosion (1)
- Kraft (1)
- Kraftstoff (1)
- Kraftübertragung (Fahrzeug) (1)
- Landstrasse (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Lang-Lkw (1)
- Leicht (1)
- Length (1)
- Lenkrad (1)
- Leuchtdiode (1)
- Lichtstärke (1)
- Lieferfahrzeug (1)
- Light (colour) (1)
- Light emitting diode (1)
- Light intensity (1)
- Lightweight (1)
- Limit (1)
- Longer and heavier vehicle (1)
- Länge (1)
- Lärm (1)
- Main road (1)
- Measuring (1)
- Menschlicher körper (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Mobile barrier (1)
- Modell (1)
- Modell (non math) (1)
- Motor (1)
- Motorhaube (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nasse Straße (1)
- Naturalistic Driving (1)
- Naturalistic driving (1)
- Noise (1)
- Nummer (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Oberbau (1)
- On the right (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Passive Sicherheit (1)
- Pavement (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Pkw; Verhütung (1)
- Pollutant (1)
- Population (1)
- Pressure (1)
- Probe (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Prüfkörper (1)
- Psychological aspects (1)
- Psychologische Gesichtspunkte (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Quality (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualität (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radio (1)
- Rammsondierung (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Real time (1)
- Rechts (1)
- Reflectorized material (1)
- Reflexstoffe (1)
- Reifenprofil (1)
- Retread tyre (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road (1)
- Road network (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Route guidance (1)
- Runderneuerter Reifen (1)
- Rundfunk (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Schadstoff (1)
- Schallpegel (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schutzhelm (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Schwingung (1)
- Second hand (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Side (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Sound level (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- Standardabweichung (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Statistic (1)
- Steering wheel (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Steuerung (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Straßennetz (1)
- Strength (mater) (1)
- Surveillance (1)
- Suspension (veh) (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Tagesfahrlicht (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (1)
- Technische Überwachung (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Terrain (1)
- Tests (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Traffic assignment (1)
- Traffic flow (1)
- Traffic lanes (1)
- Traffic regulation (1)
- Traffic sign (1)
- Tragfähigkeit (1)
- Trailer (1)
- Train (1)
- Transmission (veh) (1)
- Transport (1)
- Tunnel (1)
- Turning (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- Tyre tread (1)
- USA (1)
- Umwelt (1)
- Umweltfreundlichkeit (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfalldaten (1)
- Unfallneigung (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Unterleib (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle Regulations (1)
- Vehicle spacing (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Verkehrsfluss (1)
- Verkehrsumlegung (1)
- Verkehrszeichen (1)
- Verzögerung (1)
- Vibration (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Wasser (1)
- Water (1)
- Wearing course (1)
- Wet road (1)
- Width (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Working group (1)
- Yawing (veh) (1)
- Zahl (1)
- Zielführungssystem (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (150) (entfernen)
EEVC Status report
(2001)
EEVC Working Group 15 (Compatibility Between Passenger Cars) has carried out research for several years thanks to collaborative project funded by the E.C. and also by exchanging results of projects funded by national programmes. The main collaborative activity of the EEVC WG15 for the last four years was a research project partly funded by the European Commission, where the group made the first attempt to investigate compatibility between passenger cars in a comprehensive research program. Accident, crash test, and mathematical modelling data were analysed. The main result was that structural incompatibilities were frequently found and identified as the main source of incompatibility problems but were not easy to quantify. Unfortunately as little vehicle information other than mass is recorded in most accident databases, most analyses have only been able to show the effect of mass or mass ratio. Common ideas to improve compatibility have been reached by this group and from discussion with other research groups. They will be investigated in the next phase, where research work will concentrate on the development of methods to assess compatibility of passenger cars. The main idea is that the prerequisite to improve crash compatibility between cars is to improve structural interaction. The most important issue is that improved compatibility must not compromise a vehicle- self protection. Test methods should lead to vehicles which show good structural interaction in car to car accidents. Test methods to prove good compatibility may be an adaptation of existing regulatory test procedures (offset deformable barrier test or full width test like in the USA) for frontal impact or may be new compatibility tests. Additional criteria, e.g. impact force distribution, and maximum vehicle deceleration or maximum vehicle impact force should result in compatible cars. Attempts will be made to estimate the benefit of a more compatible car fleet for the European Community.
At the 2001 ESV-Conference the EEVC working group on compatibility (WG 15) reported the first phase of the research work to investigate the major factors influencing compatibility between passenger cars. Following this, WG15 performed an interim study, which was partly subventioned by the European Commission, the results of which are reported in this paper. In the next phase of work, it is intended to complete the development of a suite of test procedures and associated performance criteria to assess the compatibility of passenger cars in frontal impacts The main areas of work for the interim study were: - in depth accident data analysis - the development of methods to assess the potential benefit of improved compatibility - crash testing. The accident analysis identified the major compatibility problems to be poor structural interaction, stiffness mismatching and compartment strength. Different methods to assess the potential benefit of improved compatibility were applied to in depth accident data. Full scale crash testing including a car to car test was performed to help develop the following candidate compatibility test procedures: - a full width wall test with a deformable aluminium honeycomb face and a high resolution load cell wall - an offset barrier test with the EEVC barrier face and a high resolution load cell wall - an offset barrier test with the progressively deformable barrier (PDB) face. The results of the interim study will be presented in detail and the proposed methodology of the next phase to complete the development of a suite of test procedures for the assessment of car to car compatibility in frontal impacts will be outlined
The objective of European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) Working Group (WG) 15 Car Crash Compatibility and Frontal Impact is to develop a test procedure(s) with associated performance criteria and limits for car frontal impact compatibility. This work should lead to improved car to car frontal compatibility and self protection without decreasing the safety in other impact configurations such as impacts with car sides, trucks, and pedestrians. The WG consists of national government representatives who are supported by industrial advisers. The WG serves as a focal point for European research conducted by national and industry sponsored projects. The WG is responsible for collating the results from this research to achieve its objectives. EEVC WG 15 serves as a steering group for the car-to-car activities in the "Improvement of Vehicle Crash Compatibility through the Development of Crash Test Procedures"(VC-COMPAT) project partly funded by the European Commission. This paper presents a review of the current European research status. It also identifies current issues with candidate test procedures and lists the parameters that should be considered in assessing compatibility. The current candidate test procedures are: an offset barrier test with the progressive deformable barrier (PDB) face; a full width wall test with or without a deformable aluminium honeycomb face and a high resolution load cell wall; an offset barrier test with the EEVC barrier and load cell wall. These candidate test procedures must allow assessment of structural interaction, frontal force levels and compartment strength. The WG will report its findings to the EEVC Steering Committee and propose a test procedure in November 2006.
As set out in the Terms of Reference, the objective of European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) Working Group (WG) 15 Car Crash Compatibility and Frontal Impact is to develop a test procedure(s) with associated performance criteria for car frontal impact compatibility. This work should lead to improved car to car frontal compatibility and self protection without decreasing the safety in other impact configuration such as impacts with car sides, trucks, and pedestrians. Since 2003, EEVC WG 15 served as a steering group for the car-to-car activities in the "Improvement of Vehicle Crash Compatibility through the development of Crash Test Procedures" (VC-COMPAT) project that was finalised at the end of 2006 and partly funded by the European Commission. This paper presents the research work carried out in the VC-COMPAT project and the results of its assessment by EEVC WG 15. Other additional work presented by the UK and French governments and industry " in particular the European industry - was taken into consideration. It also identifies current issues with candidate testing approaches. The candidate test approaches are: - an offset barrier test with the progressive deformable barrier (PDB) face in combination with a full width rigid barrier test - a full width wall test with a deformable aluminium honeycomb face and a high resolution load cell wall supplemented by the forces measured in the offset deformable barrier (ODB) test with the current EEVC barrier. These candidate test approaches must assess the structural interaction and give information of frontal force levels and compartment strength for passenger vehicles. Further, this paper presents the planned route map of EEVC WG 15 for the evaluation of the proposed test procedures and assessment criteria.
Das Ziel der Untersuchung war, die Grenzen der Belastbarkeit eines Rollstuhl- und Personenrückhaltesystems mit Kraftknoten nach DIN 75078-2 zu ermitteln. Dazu wurden dynamische Schlittenversuche durchgeführt, bei denen die Verzögerungspulse sowie das Gesamtgewicht von Rollstuhl und Prüfpuppe variiert wurden. Für die Untersuchungen kamen ein Prüfrollstuhl, definiert nach ISO 10542, und Rückhaltesysteme mit Kraftknoten gemäß DIN 75078-2 zum Einsatz. Das Rückhaltesystem bestand aus einem Rollstuhl- und einem Personenrückhaltesystem, wobei das Rollstuhlrückhaltesystem (RRS) mit vier bzw. sechs Gurten und entsprechenden Retraktoren an einem dynamischen Schlittenaufbau befestigt wurde. Das Personenrückhaltesystem (PRS) bestand aus einem am Rollstuhl integrierten Beckengurt sowie einem Schulterschräggurt, der am Beckengurt und am Schlittenaufbau befestigt wurde. Ferner wurden bei den Versuchen Prüfpuppen verschiedener Alters- und Gewichtsklassen (P6, HIII 5 %, HIII 50 % und HIII 95 %) eingesetzt Die Belastungsanforderungen für das Rückhaltesystem wurden sukzessiv erweitert, indem einerseits das Gesamtgewicht (Rollstuhl und Prüfpuppe) und andererseits auch die Verzögerungspulse bis zur Versagensgrenze erhöht wurden. Das Vier-Gurt-Rückhaltesystem konnte bei einem Verzögerungspuls von 10 g einem Gesamtgewicht von bis zu 221 kg standhalten. Bei einem Verzögerungspuls von 20 g und einem Gesamtgewicht von 134 kg wurde das Vier-Gurt-System bis über die Grenzen belastet. Das Sechs-Gurt-Rückhaltesystem hat Belastungen bis 221 kg standgehalten. Infolgedessen ist bei einer Erhöhung der Verzögerungspulse auf 20 g und einem Gesamtgewicht von mehr als 109 kg ein Sechs-Gurt-System zu empfehlen.
The UN Regulation No. 79 is going to be amended to allow automatically commanded steering functions (ACSF) at speeds above 10 km/h. Hence, requirements concerning the approval of automatically performed steering manoeuvres have to be set in order to allow safe use of automatic steering on public roads as well as improve overall road safety for the driver and the surroundings. By order of the German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI), BASt developed and verified physical test procedures for automatic steering to be implemented in UN Regulation No. 79. The usability of currently available test tools was examined. The paper at hand describes these test procedures and presents results from verification tests. The designated tests are divided in three sections: functionality tests, verifications for the transition of control and emergency tests. System functionality tests are auto matic lane keeping, automatic lane change and an automatic abort of an initiated lane change due to traffic. Those tests check if the vehicle remains in its lane (under normal operating conditions), is able to perform safe automatic lane change manoeuvres and if it considers other road users during its manoeuvres. Transition tests examine the vehicle's behaviour when the driver fails to monitor the system and in situations when the system has to hand over the steering control back to the driver. For instance these tests provoke driver-in-the-loop requests by approaching system boundary limitations, like missing lane markings, surpassing maximum lateral acceleration in a bend or even a major system failure. Even further the driver and his inputs are monitored and if the system detects that he is overriding system actions or contrary want to quit the driving task and unfastens the seat belt, it has to shut down and put the human back into manually control and the responsibility of driving. The last series of test consists of two emergency situations in which the system has to react to a time critical event: A hard decelerating vehicle and a stationary vehicle in front both with no lane change possibility for the ACSF vehicle. Some of the tests, especially the emergency manoeuvres, require special target vehicles and propulsion systems. Since no fully automatic steering vehicles are available, a current Mercedes E-Class with Mercedes' "drive pilot" system was used. It was shown that the vehicle is automatically able to brake to a full stop towards a static Euro NCAP target from partial-automatic driving at 90 km/h, that it could brake towards a rapidly decelerating lead vehicle when travelling at 70 km/h, that it was able during partially automatic driving to remain in its lane in normal operation conditions and to perform a automatic (driver initiated) lane change while surveilling the driver- activities.
In der Europäischen Union (EU) gab es 1999 circa 1,3 Millionen Straßenverkehrsunfälle mit Personenschaden, wobei circa 42.000 Personen getötet wurden. Ziel der EU ist es diese Zahl auf 25.000 im Jahr 2010 zu senken. Die EEVC befasst sich bereits seit Anfang der 80er Jahre mit der Thematik Fußgängerschutz in verschiedenen Arbeitsgruppen. Im Dezember 1998 legte die EEVC-Arbeitsgruppe 17 "Fußgängersicherheit" ihren Abschlussbericht vor, in dessen Anhang ein Prüfverfahren zum fahrzeugseitigen Fußgängerschutz enthalten ist. Dieses Prüfverfahren wird vorgestellt. Es basiert auf Komponententests. Unterschieden werden drei Prüfkörperarten und insgesamt vier Prüfkörper. Aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht und aus Sicht der Unfallforschung empfiehlt die EEVC-Arbeitsgruppe 17 eine umfassende Einführung des vorgeschlagenen Prüfverfahrens mit allen Prüfkörpern, gegebenenfalls in Form einer stufenweisen Einführung.
Since its beginning in 1999, the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) evolved into the presumably leading representative road traffic accident investigation in Europe, based on the work started in Hanover in 1973. The detailed and comprehensive description of traffic accidents forms an essential basis for vehicle safety research. Due to the ongoing extension of demands of researchers, there is a continuous progress in the techniques and systematic of accident investigation within GIDAS. This paper presents some of the most important developments over the last years. Primary vehicle safety systems are expected to have a significant and increasing influence on reducing accidents. GIDAS therefore began to include and collect active safety parameters as new variables from the year 2005 onwards. This will facilitate to assess the impact of present and future active safety measures. A new system to analyse causation factors of traffic accidents, called ACASS, was implemented in GIDAS in the year 2008. The whole process of data handling was optimised. Since 2005 the on-scene data acquisition is completely conducted with mobile tablet PCs. Comprehensive plausibility checks assure a high data quality. Multi-language codebooks are automatically generated from the database structure itself and interfaces ensure the connection to various database management systems. Members of the consortium can download database and codebook, and synchronize half a terabyte of photographic documentation through a secured online access. With the introduction of the AIS 2005 in the year 2006, some medical categorizations have been revised. To ensure the correct assignment of AIS codes to specific injuries an application based on a diagnostic dictionary was developed. Furthermore a coding tool for the AO classification was introduced. All these enhancements enable GIDAS to be up to date for future research questions.
Except for corrective steering functions automatic steering is up to now only allowed at speeds up to 10 km/h according to UN Regulation No. 79. Progress in automotive engineering with regard to driver assistance systems and automation of driving tasks is that far that it would be technically feasible to realise automatically commanded steering functions also at higher vehicle speeds. Besides improvements in terms of comfort these automated systems are expected to contribute to road traffic safety as well. However, this safety potential will only be exhausted if automated steering systems are properly designed. Especially possible new risks due to automated steering have to be addressed and reduced to a minimum. For these reasons work is currently ongoing on UNECE level with the aim to amend the regulation dealing with provisions concerning the approval of steering equipment. It is the aim to revise requirements for automatically commanded steering functions (ACSF) so that they can be approved also for higher speeds if certain performance requirements are fulfilled. The paper at hand describes the derivation of reasonable system specifications from an analysis of relevant driving situations with an automated steering system. Needs are explained with regard to covering normal driving, sudden unexpected critical events, transition to manual driving, driver availability and manoeuvres to reach a state of minimal risk. These issues form the basis for the development of test procedures for automated steering to be implemented in international regulations. This holds for system functionalities like automatic lane keeping or automatic lane change as well as for addressing transition situations in which the system has to hand over steering to the driver or addressing emergency situations in which the system has to react instead of the driver.
The goal of the project FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) was to define an integrated set of test procedures and associated metrics to assess a vehicle's frontal impact protection, which includes self- and partner-protection. For the development of the set, two different full-width tests (full-width deformable barrier [FWDB] test, full-width rigid barrier test) and three different offset tests (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test, progressive deformable barrier [PDB] test, moveable deformable barrier with the PDB barrier face [MPDB] test) have been investigated. Different compatibility assessment procedures were analysed and metrics for assessing structural interaction (structural alignment, vertical and horizontal load spreading) as well as several promising metrics for the PDB/MPDB barrier were developed. The final assessment approach consists of a combination of the most suitable full-width and offset tests. For the full-width test (FWDB), a metric was developed to address structural alignment based on load cell wall information in the first 40 ms of the test. For the offset test (ODB), the existing ECE R94 was chosen. Within the paper, an overview of the final assessment approach for the frontal impact test procedures and their development is given.
The ASSESS project is a collaborative project that develops test procedures for pre-crash safety systems like Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB). One key criterion for the effectiveness of e.g. AEB is reduction in collision speed compared to baseline scenarios without AEB. The speed reduction for a given system can only be determined in real world tests that will end with a collision. Soft targets that are crashable up to velocities of 80 km/h are state of the art for these assessments, but ordinary balloon cars are usually stationary targets. The ASSESS project goes one step further and defines scenarios with moving targets. These scenarios define vehicle speeds of up to 100 km/h, different collision scenarios and relative collision speeds of up to 80km/h. This paper describes the development of a propulsion system for a soft target that aims to be used with these demanding scenario specifications. The Federal Highway Research Institute- (BASt-) approach to move the target is a self-driving small cart. The cart is controlled either by a driver (open-loop control via remote-control) or by a computer (closed-loop control). Its weight is limited to achieve a good crashability without damages to the test vehicle. To the extent of our knowledge BASt- approach is unique in this field (other carts cannot move at such high velocities or are not crashable). This paper describes in detail the challenges and solutions that were found both for the mechanical construction and the implementation of the control and safety system. One example for the mechanical challenges is e.g. the position of the vehicle- center of gravity (CG). An optimum compromise had to be found between a low CG oriented to the front of the vehicle (good for driveability) and a high CG oriented to the rear of the vehicle (good for crashability). The soft target itself which is also developed within the ASSESS project will not be covered in detail as this is work of a project partner. Publications on this will follow. The paper also shows first test results, describes current limitations and gives an outlook. It is expected that the presented test tools for AEB and other pre-crash safety systems is introduced in the future into consumer testing (NCAP) as well as regulatory testing.
The objective was to develop and validate a crash trolley (reference vehicle) equipped with a compartment and a full restraint system for driver and front seat passenger which can be used in full scale crash testing. Furthermore, the crash trolley should have a suspension to show rotation and nick effects similar to real vehicles. Within the development phase the reference vehicle was build based on a European family car. Special attention was needed to provide appropriate strength to the trolley and its suspension. The reference vehicle is equipped with a restraint system consisting of airbags, pedals, seats, dashboard, and windscreen. On the front of the vehicle different crash barriers can be installed to provide miscellaneous deceleration pulses. For the validation phase a series of low and high speed crash tests with HIII dummies were conducted and compared with full scale tests. For the comparison deceleration pulse, dummy numbers and vehicle movement were analyzed. Validation tests with velocities up to 60 km/h showed promising results. The compartment and the suspension systems stayed stable. Rotation effects were comparable with full scale car crash tests. The airbags and seat belt system worked reasonable. The acceleration pulse compared to an Euro NCAP test had a similar characteristic but was in general slightly lower. After the successful validation the reference vehicle is already in use in different studies in the field of vehicle safety research at BASt.
At the 2005 ESV conference, the International Harmonisation of Research Activities (IHRA) side impact working group proposed a 4 part draft test procedure, to form the basis of harmonisation of regulation world-wide and to help advances in car occupant protection. This paper presents the work performed by a European Commission 6th framework project, called APROSYS, an further development and evaluation of the proposed procedure from a European perspective. The 4 parts of the proposed procedure are: - A Mobile Deformable Barrier test; - An oblique Pole side impact test; - Interior headform tests; - Side Out of Position (OOP) tests. Full scale test and modelling work to develop the Advanced European Mobile Deformable Barrier (AE-MDB) further is described, resulting in a recommendation to revise the barrier face to include a bumper beam element. An evaluation of oblique and perpendicular pole tests was made from tests and numerical simulations using ES-2 and WorldSID 50th percentile dummies. It was concluded that an oblique pole test is feasible but that a perpendicular test would be preferable for Europe. The interior headform test protocol was evaluated to assess its repeatability and reproducibility and to solve issues such as the head impact angle and limitation zones. Recommendations for updates to the test protocol are made. Out-of-position (OOP) tests applicable for the European situation were performed, which included additional tests with Child Restraint Systems (CRS) which use is mandatory in Europe. It was concluded that the proposed IHRA OOP tests do cover the worst case situations, but the current test protocol is not ready for regulatory use.
In der Europäischen Gemeinschaft werden derzeit jährlich ca. 50.000 Menschen bei Verkehrsunfällen getötet, ca. 10.000 davon als Fußgänger. Von den 10.600 (1992) in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland bei Straßenverkehrsunfällen Getöteten waren 1.800 Fußgänger (etwa 17 Prozent). Problemgruppen bei Fußgängerunfällen bilden die Kinder wegen ihrer hohen Unfallhäufigkeit und alte Personen wegen ihrer hohen Unfallschwere. Kopfverletzungen sind die häufigste Todesursache bei Fußgängerunfällen. Eine Verringerung der Unfallschwere kann - außer durch Verminderung von Fahr- beziehungsweise Aufprallgeschwindigkeiten der Fahrzeuge - nur durch konstruktive Eingriffe an der vorderen Fahrzeugaußenkontur oder dem Unterbau von Pkw erfolgen. Dazu ist es notwendig, einheitliche Prüfverfahren für die Beurteilung der "Fahrzeugaggressivität" gegenüber Fußgängern bereitzustellen. Die Ableitung eines Prüfvorschlages zur Simulation des Kopfaufpralls auf Fronthauben von Pkw beim Fußgängerunfall, unterteilt in Kopfaufpralltests für Erwachsene und Kinder, ist Gegenstand dieser Arbeit. Es werden, ausgehend von einer Analyse der Unfallstatistik, der Entstehungsmechanismus von Kopfverletzungen erklärt, die für ein Prüfverfahren notwendigen Eingangsparameter (Masse, Geschwindigkeit, Aufprallstellen am Fahrzeug etc.) abgeleitet und die Ergebnisse der gewählten Prüfkörpertestmethode mit Ergebnissen von Leichenversuchen verglichen. Eine Kosten-/Nutzen-Betrachtung am Schluss der Arbeit zeigt, dass sich bei nur geringen Kosten ein volkswirtschaftlicher Nutzen durch eine allgemeine Anwendung des Prüfverfahrens mit ca. 270 Millionen DM allein in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland pro Jahr erzielen ließe.
Ausgehend von den Unfalldaten der letzten Jahre wird die Bedeutung von Fußgängerunfällen im Unfallgeschehen dargestellt. Betrachtet man die bei Unfällen getöteten Verkehrsteilnehmer, so sind am häufigsten Personen in Kraftfahrzeugen betroffen. Am zweithäufigsten werden, gemäß der Unfallstatistik, Fußgänger getötet. Eine Möglichkeit zur Verbesserung des Schutzes von Fußgängern und anderen sogenannten "ungeschützten Verkehrsteilnehmern" im Falle einer Kollision mit einem Kraftfahrzeug sind Maßnahmen am Fahrzeug. Um die Wirksamkeit derartiger Maßnahmen zu beurteilen, wurde durch das EEVC (European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee) ein Prüfverfahren entwickelt. Es handelt sich dabei um ein Komponentenprüfverfahren, mit dem die Frontstruktur von Fahrzeugen, die bei einer Kollision mit einem Fußgänger hauptsächlich betroffen ist, geprüft wird. Es werden keine den gesamten Menschen repräsentierende Dummies verwendet, stattdessen werden Prüfkörper, die einzelne Körperteile simulieren, eingesetzt. Dieser EEVC Vorschlag wird geschildert. Darüber hinaus wird über Aktivitäten außerhalb des EEVC berichtet, sowie über den aktuellen Stand der Bemühungen der Europäischen Kommission in Bezug auf den Fußgängerschutz, die derzeit, auf Grundlage des Prüfvorschlages des EEVC, einen Vorschlag für eine Europäische Richtlinie erarbeitet.
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
In Germany the number of casualties in passenger car to pedestrian crashes has been reduced by a considerable amount of 40% as regards fatalities and 25% with regard to seriously injured pedestrians since the year 2001. Similar trends can be seen in other European countries. The reasons for that positive development are still under investigation. As infrastructural or behavioral changes do in general take a longer time to be effective in real world, explanations related to improved active and passive safety of passenger vehicles can be more relevant in providing answers for this trend. The effect of passive pedestrian protection " specified by the Euro NCAP pedestrian test result " is of particular interest and has already been analyzed by several authors. However, the number of vehicles with some valid Euro NCAP pedestrian score (post 2002 rating) was quite limited in most of those studies. To overcome this problem of small datasets German National Accident Records have been taken to investigate a similar objective but now based on a much bigger dataset. The paper uses German National Accident Records from the years 2009 to 2011. In total 65.140 records of pedestrian to passenger car crashes have been available. Considering crash parameters like accident location (rural / urban areas) etc., 27.143 of those crashes have been classified to be relevant for the analysis of passive pedestrian safety. In those 27.143 records 7.576 Euro NCAP rated vehicles (post 2002 rating) have been identified. In addition it was possible to identify vehicles which comply with pedestrian protection legislation (2003/102/EG) where phase 1 came into force in October 2005. A significant correlation between Euro NCAP pedestrian score and injury outcome in real-life car to pedestrian crashes was found. Comparing a vehicle scoring 5 points and a vehicle scoring 22 points, pedestrians" conditional probability of getting fatally injured is reduced by 35% (from 0.58% to 0.37%) for the later one. At the same time the probability of serious injuries can be reduced by 16% (from 27.4% to 22.9%). No significant injury reducing effect, associated with the introduction of pedestrian protection legislation (phase 1) was detected. Considerable effects have also been identified comparing diesel and gasoline cars. Higher engine displacements are associated with a lower injury risk for pedestrians. The most relevant parameter has been "time of accident", whereas pedestrians face a more than 2 times higher probability to be fatally injured during night and darkness as compared to daytime conditions.
The 2BeSafe project (2-Wheeler Behaviour and Safety) is a collaborative project (co financed by the European Commission) that aims to study the naturalistic behaviour of Powered-Two-Wheeler (PTW) riders in normal and critical riding situations. That includes the interaction between PTW riders and other road users and possible conflicts between them. One of the predominant causes of accidents involving PTWs is that PTWs are often overlooked by other road users. One task of the project lead by BASt therefore deals with possible improvements in conspicuity and the development of recommendations. Particularly using the findings of the studies on conflict situations, promising lighting arrangements to enhance conspicuity of PTWs during the day and at night are selected. An abstract recognizing pattern for PTWs is defined, enabling other road users (e.g. car drivers) to clearly identify riders. Lamps and outfit like lighting configurations of different colours, different helmet lights, reflect / luminescent clothing parts and retro-reflective markings are designed and manufactured. Then, the different solutions are tested in a laboratory setting using experimental motorcycles together with riders to which the equipment is fitted. As result a proposal for a uniform signal pattern or lamp configuration in the front of all motorcycles and riders will be outlined. The contribution first gives a short overview of the topics of the research project that deal with conflicts and their connection with poor conspicuity and then presents in detail the methods used in the activities concerning solutions for the improvement of conspicuity together with first results.
The levels of continuous vehicle automation have become common knowledge. They facilitate overall understanding of the issue. Yet, continuous vehicle automation described therein does not cover "automated driving" as a whole: Functions intervening temporarily in accident-prone situations can obviously not be classified by means of continuous levels. Continuous automation describes the shift in workload from purely human driven vehicles to full automation. Duties of the driver are assigned to the machine as automation levels rise. Emergency braking, e.g., is obviously discontinuous and intensive automation. It cannot be classified under this regime. The resulting absence of visibility of these important functions cannot satisfy " especially in the light of effect they take on traffic safety. Therefore, in order to reach a full picture of vehicle automation, a comprehensive approach is proposed that can map out different characteristics as "Principle of Operation" at top level. On this basis informing and warning functions as well as functions intervening only temporarily in near-accident situations can be described. To reach a complete picture, levels for the discontinuous, temporarily intervening functions are proposed " meant to be the counterpart of the continuous levels already in place. This results in a detailed and independent classification for accident-prone situations. This finally provides for the visibility these important functions deserve.