Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (701)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (209)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (110)
- Bericht (26)
- Arbeitspapier (25)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (12)
Sprache
- Deutsch (907)
- Englisch (174)
- Mehrsprachig (2)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (1083) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (634)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (157)
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (133)
- Abteilung Brücken- und Ingenieurbau (75)
- Abteilung Straßenbautechnik (64)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (50)
- Präsident (10)
- Stabstelle Presse und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (4)
- Stabstelle Forschungscontrolling, Qualitätsmanagement (1)
- Zentralabteilung (1)
The paper gives an overview of the recent (mostly 2012) figures of killed bus/coach occupants (drivers and passengers) in 27 Member States of the European Union as reported by CARE. The Evolution of the figures of bus/coach occupants killed in road accidents urban, rural without motorway and on motorways from 1991 to 2010 in 15 Member States of the EU supplements this information. More detailed are the figures reported for Germany by the Federal Statistics. The paper displays long-term evaluations (1957 to 2012) for killed, seriously and slightly injured occupants in all kinds of buses/coaches. Midterm evaluations (1995 to 2012) of the figures of fatalities and casualties are displayed for different busses according to their identification of road using as coaches, urban buses, school buses, trolley buses and "other buses". To be able to compare the evolutions of the safety of vehicle occupants it is customary to use different risk indicators. Calculations and illustrations for three often used indicators with their development over time are given: fatalities, seriously injured and slightly injured per 100,000 vehicles registered, per 1 billion (109) vehicle-kilometres travelled and per 1 billion (109) person-kilometres. These indicators are shown for occupants of cars, goods vehicles and buses/coaches. For the period from 1957 until 2012 it is obvious, that for all three vehicle categories analysed there was a clear long-term trend towards more occupant safety in terms of casualties per vehicles registered and per vehicle mileage. This was most significant for car occupants but it can be seen for bus/coach occupants and goodsvehicle occupants as well. Figures of killed occupants and of casualties related to person-kilometres are calculated and displayed for the shorter period 1995 to 2012. Here it becomes obvious that the bus/coach is still the safest mode of transport for the occupants of road vehicles. Graphs for the casualty risk indices still show significantly higher risks for car occupants despite the corresponding curve moved sustainable downwards. It is remarkable, that the risks of being killed or injured for the occupants of urban buses is growing whereas the corresponding risk for the occupants of coaches in line traffic tends downwards. The article ends with a short comparison and discussion of the risk indicators which are actually published for the occupants (driver and passengers) of cars and the passengers of buses/coaches, railroads, trams and airplanes. The interpretation of such information depends on the perception and it seems that for a complete view not only one indicator should be used and the evolutions of the indicator values during longer periods (as displayed with examples in the paper) should also be taken into account.
Within the COST Action TU1101 the working group WG 1 is dealing with acceptance criteria and problems in helmet use while bicycling concerning conspicuity, thermal stress, ventilation deficits and other potential confounding. To analyze the helmet usage practice of bicyclists in Europe a questionnaire was developed in the scope of working group 1 to collect relevant information by means of a field study. The questionnaire consists of some 66 questions covering the fields of personal data of the cyclist, riding und helmet usage habits, information concerning the helmet model and the sensation of the helmet, as well as information on previous bicycle accidents. A second complementary study is conducted to analyze if the use of a bicycle helmet influences the seating geometry and the posture of cyclists when riding a bicycle and if the if the helmet vertically limits the vision. For this purpose cyclists with and without helmets were photographed in real world situations and relevant geometrical values such as the decline of the torso, the head posture of the upper vertical vision limit due to the helmet were established from the photos. The interim results of the field studies which were conducted in Germany by the Hannover Medical School are presented in this study. Some 227 questionnaires were filled out, of which 67 participants had used a helmet and 42 of the 227 participants have had a bicycle accident before. For the analysis of the riding position and posture of the cyclist over 40 pictures of riders with a helmet and over 240 pictures of riders without a helmet were measured concerning the seating geometry to describe the influence of using a bicycle helmet. Some results in summary: From the riders interviewed with the questionnaire only 11% of the city bike riders and 12% of the mountain bike riders always used the helmet, while 38% of the racing bike riders and 88% of the e-bike-riders always used the helmet. The helmet use seems not to change the sensation of safety of cycling compared to the use of a car. The arguments for not wearing a helmet are mostly stated to be the short distance of a trip, high temperatures or carelessness and waste of time. The reasons for using a helmet are stated to be the feeling of safety and being used to using a helmet. Being a role model for others was also stated to be a reason for helmet use. Concerning the sensation of the helmet 9% of the riders reported problems with the field of vision when using a helmet, 57% saw the problem of sweating too much, and 10% reported headaches or other unpleasant symptoms like pressure on the forehead when using the helmet. The analysis of the seating posture from the pictures taken of cyclists revealed that older cyclists generally have a riding position where the handle bar is higher than the seat (0-° to 10-° incline from seat to handlebar), while younger riders had a higher variance (between -10-° decline and 20-° incline). Further, elderly riders and riders with helmets seem to have a more upright position of the upper body when cycling. The vertical vision limit due to the helmet is determined by the front rim of the helmet (mostly the sun shade). Typical values here range from 0-° (horizontal line from the eye to the sun shade) to 75-° upwards, in which elderly riders tend to have a slightly higher vertical vision limit possibly due to the helmet being worn more towards the face.
Although the annual traffic accident statistics published by the national police is available in public, the detailed traffic accident data has not been released in Korea. Recently the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport recognized the importance of in-depth accident data to enhance road traffic safety and initiated a research project to establish a collection of the detailed accident data. The main objective of the project is a feasibility study to establish KIDAS (Korea In-Depth Accident Study). Within this project, three university hospitals which are located in mid-size cities have been selected to collect accident data. Annually, more than 500 cases of accidents have been collected from the in-patient's interviews and diagnosis. Unlike GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study), currently on-site investigation can"t be performed by the Korean police. The only available data is patient medical records, patient's description of accident circumstances and the damaged vehicle. Occasionally the police provide the accident investigation reports containing very brief information on accident causation and vehicle safety. In a first step, the concept of KIDAS is to adopt the format of iGLAD (Initiative for the Global Harmonization of Accident Data) for harmonization. Since the currently collected accident information is extremely limited compared with GIDAS, the other sources of data and calculations such as KNCAP vehicle data, pc-crash simulations, vehicle registration information, insurance company data are utilized to complete the iGLAD template. Results from KIDAS_iGLAD and the cases of assessment of active safety devices such as AEBS, ESC, and LDWS will be evaluated.
Der Entwurf und der Betrieb von Tunneln im Zuge von Bundesautobahnen sind in den Richtlinien für die Anlage von Autobahnen (RAA 2008) und in den Richtlinien für die Ausstattung und den Betrieb von Straßentunneln (RABT 2006) geregelt. Hier sind die Hinweise zu der Wahl des Tunnelquerschnittes und zu den anzusetzenden Trassierungsgrenzwerten sowie die Anforderungen hinsichtlich Sicherheit und Betriebsabläufen enthalten. Zielsetzung des Forschungsvorhabens war es daher, die Tunnelbauwerke bezüglich ihrer Verkehrssicherheit zu untersuchen. Auf Grundlage der vorhandenen Informationen zur Trassierung wurden die Tunnelbauwerke gemäß ihrer Besonderheiten typisiert. Die Typisierung der 41 untersuchten Tunnel wurde anhand der Merkmale Fahrstreifenanzahl, dem Vorhandensein von Seitenstreifen und Ein- und Ausfahrten in Tunneln sowie der Höhe der zulässigen Höchstgeschwindigkeit vorgenommen. Im nächsten Arbeitsschritt wurde eine makroskopische Unfallanalyse durchgeführt. Für die Analyse wurden die Verkehrsunfallanzeigen bzw. vergleichbare Unfalldaten aus Lieferungen der Polizeidienststellen herangezogen. Darauf aufbauend wurden Unfallkenngrößen der einzelnen Tunnelröhren ermittelt. Das Tunnelkollektiv umfasste Tunnelstrecken sowohl mit als auch ohne Anschlussstellen. In der makroskopischen Unfallanalyse wurden die ermittelten Unfallkenngrößen der Tunnelteilkollektive gegenübergestellt sowie mit denen der Aussenstrecken verglichen. Die Bewertung des Unfallgeschehens in Tunneln führte zu der Erkenntnis, dass eine Anordnung von Seitenstreifen zur Senkung der Unfallrate und der mittleren Unfallkostenrate bei 2-streifigen Tunnelquerschnitten beitragen kann. In der anschließenden mikroskopischen Unfallanalyse wurden die Anschlussstellen innerhalb der Tunnelbauwerke untersucht. Hierbei wurden vor allem die Unfallmerkmale wie Unfallursachen und Unfallumstände näher betrachtet. Die Betrachtung der Lage von Ein- und Ausfahrten in Tunneln hat ergeben, dass diese keine eindeutige Auswirkung auf das Unfallgeschehen hat. Infolge der Ein und Ausfahrvorgänge treten jedoch vermehrt Unfälle in diesen Bereichen auf. Somit sind die Ein- und Ausfahrten in Tunneln nach Möglichkeit zu vermeiden. Darüber hinaus wurde eine Analyse zum Verkehrsablauf in Tunneln durchgeführt. Im Rahmen dieser Analyse erfolgten für ausgewählte Tunnel die Modellierung von q-V-Beziehungen und die Ermittlung von Kapazitätswerten.
Since a number of human models have been developed it appears sensible to use these models also in the accident analysis. Especially the understanding of injury mechanisms and probably even injury risk curves can be significantly improved when interesting accidents are reconstructed using human body models. However, an important limitation for utilising human models for accident reconstruction is the effort needed to develop detailed FE models of the accident partners or to prepare the human model reconstruction by running physical accident reconstructions. The proposed approach for using human models for accident reconstruction is to use simplified and parametric car models. These models can be adapted to the crash opponents in a fast and cost effective way. Although, accuracy is less compared to detailed FE models, the relevant change in velocity can be simulated well, indicating that the computation of a detailed crash pulse is not needed. Two frontal impact test accidents that were reconstructed experimentally and using the parametric car models are indicating sufficient correlation of the adapted parametric car models with the full scale crash reconstructions. However, further developments of the parametric models to be capable for the use in lateral impacts and rear impacts are needed. For the PC Crash simulation runs the output sampling rate is too large to allow sufficient analysis. In addition the performance appears to be too general.
The main focus of the benefit estimation of advanced safety systems with a warning interface by simulation is on the driver. The driver is the only link between the algorithm of the safety system and the vehicle, which makes the setup of a driver model for such simulations very important. This paper describes an approach for the use of a statistical driver model in simulation. It also gives an outlook on further work on this topic. The build-up process of the model suffices with a distribution of reaction times and a distribution of reaction intensities. Both were combined in different scenarios for every driver. Each scenario has then a specific probability to occur. To use the statistical driver model, every accident scene has to be simulated with each driver scenario (combinations of reaction times and intensities). The results of the simulations are then combined regarding the probabilities to occur, which leads to an overall estimated benefit of the specific system. The model works with one or more equipped participants and delivers a range for the benefit of advanced safety systems with warning interfaces.
The study aimed at estimating the impact of pedelecs (with an assumed higher speed than bicycles) on the traffic accident severity in Germany for different penetration rates. The analysis shows that in many real situations (68%) an electrical support of bicycles has no influence on the sequence of accident events. Taking into account a number of unreported "single bicycle accidents", the adoption of similar traffic behavior and similar age distribution, the authors determined a shift of 400 former slightly to seriously injured cyclists in Germany per year. Overall this would be an increase of approximately 2.3% in case of 10% of pedelec penetration with the pessimistic assumption of 10 km/h speed increase although first natural driving studies predict a much lower average speed increase of pedelecs. The hypothesis verbalized in the initial question whether a higher distribution of pedelecs will result in more severe accidents in Germany is not verified. The study shows that electrical support didn"t result in higher collision speed in general. In many accident situations, the speed of pedelecs has only a minor influence on the accident severity. Further research focusing on a possible change of driver behavior especially in new target groups (elderly people) will be needed.
Mit der Einführung der "Richtlinien für die Anlage von Landstraßen" (RAL, 2012) soll in Deutschland ein weiterer Beitrag zur Erhöhung der Verkehrssicherheit geleistet werden. Durch standardisierte, wieder erkennbare und voneinander unterscheidbare Typen von Landstraßen wird das Ziel verfolgt, dem Kraftfahrer eine für die Netzfunktion einer Landstraße angemessene Fahrweise zu verdeutlichen. Auf den schmalen Straßen mit nahräumiger Verbindungsfunktion sind dafür statt der bisher gebräuchlichen Fahrbahnbegrenzungen (Zeichen 295, StVO) und der Leitlinie in Fahrbahnmitte (Zeichen 340, StVO) seitlich vom Rand der befestigten Fläche abgesetzte Leitlinien vorgesehen, die im Begegnungsfall bei Bedarf überfahren werden können. Die optisch verengte Fläche zwischen diesen Leitlinien und das Fehlen einer Leitlinie in Fahrbahnmitte sollen dem Kraftfahrer signalisieren, dass im Begegnungsfall erhöhte Aufmerksamkeit geboten ist. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, Empfehlungen zur Querschnittsgestaltung und zur zweckmäßigen Art der Markierung für derartige Nahbereichsstraßen zu geben. Die Untersuchungsmethodik umfasst sowohl Untersuchungen zum Fahrverhalten im Fahrsimulator als auch auf Messstrecken in Nordrhein-Westfalen und in Sachsen sowie Untersuchungen zum Gefährdungspotenzial des Radverkehrs als auch Vorher-/Nachher-Unfalluntersuchungen. Die Linienführung der ausgewählten Messstrecken wurde für den Vorher-/Nachher-Vergleich des Fahrverhaltens im Fahrsimulator nachgebildet. Dabei wurden verschiedene Variationen aus Querschnittsbreite, Fahrstreifenaufteilung und Markierungsformen simuliert, um eine Vorzugsvariante für die Umsetzung auf den Messstrecken zu ermitteln. Neben der Auswertung des Fahrverhaltens der Probanden wurden diese zur Akzeptanz der einzelnen Varianten befragt. Ergebnis der Untersuchungen im Fahrsimulator ist eine generelle Präferenz der Probanden zu seitlichen Leitlinien, die einen Meter vom Rand der befestigten Fläche abgesetzt sind. Diese bewirken beim Befahren ohne Gegenverkehr einen höheren Abstand zum befestigten Fahrbahnrand. Unterbrochene Leitlinien zeigen darüber hinaus eine geschwindigkeitsreduzierende Wirkung, die bei einem Strich-Lücke-Verhältnis von 1:1 am größten ist. Ausgehend von diesen Ergebnissen wurden in Abhängigkeit von den befestigten Breiten auf den Messstrecken verschiedene Varianten markiert und deren Wirkung durch einen Vergleich des Spur- und Geschwindigkeitsverhaltens vor und nach Umsetzung der Maßnahme überprüft. Die Untersuchung zum Spurverhalten zeigte, dass die Kraftfahrer ohne Gegenverkehr einen größeren Abstand zum befestigten Rand halten. Die Messungen zeigen ferner, dass die Kraftfahrer rechtzeitig vor der Begegnung mit anderen Fahrzeugen die seitlichen Leitlinien überfahren; Konflikte mit dem Gegenverkehr wurden dabei nicht beobachtet. Bei vorhandenem Radverkehr konnten ebenfalls keine Konflikte festgestellt werden. Die Kraftfahrer halten genügend Abstand während des Überholvorganges zum Radfahrer ein. Die Erwartung, dass die neue Art der Markierung zu geringeren Fahrgeschwindigkeiten führen könnte, hat sich abweichend von Ergebnissen anderer Forschungsarbeiten bei dieser Untersuchung nicht bestätigt. Es wurden im Vergleich zum Vorher-Zustand annähernd identische Geschwindigkeiten gemessen. Dass sich die Geschwindigkeiten kaum verändern, spiegelt sich letztendlich auch im Unfallgeschehen wider. Im Rahmen des Vorher-/ Nachher-Unfallvergleiches konnten keine signifikanten maßnahmebedingten Änderungen des Unfallgeschehens festgestellt werden. Zusammenfassend können aufgrund der vom Kraftfahrer bei der Alleinfahrt gewählten größeren Abstände zum Rand der befestigten Fläche und der bei Gegenverkehr rechtzeitig eingeleiteten Ausweichmanöver die vom befestigten Rand abgesetzten "überfahrbaren" Leitlinien empfohlen werden.
The evaluation of the expected benefit of active safety systems or even ideas of future systems is challenging because this has to be done prospectively. Beside acceptance, the predicted real-world benefit of active safety systems is one of the most important and interesting measures. Therefore, appropriate methods should be used that meet the requirements concerning representativeness, robustness and accuracy. The paper presents the development of a methodology for the assessment of current and future vehicle safety systems. The variety of systems requires several tools and methods and thus, a common tool box was created. This toolbox consists of different levels, regarding different aspects like data sources, scenarios, representativeness, measures like pre-crash-simulations, automated crash computation, single-case-analyses or driving simulator studies. Finally, the benefit of the system(s) is calculated, e.g. by using injury risk functions; giving the number of avoided/mitigated accidents, the reduction of injured or killed persons or the decrease of economic costs.
In North America, frontal crash tests in both the regulatory environment and consumer-based safety rating schemes have historically been based on full-width and moderate-overlap (40%) vehicle to barrier impacts. The combination of improved seat-belt technologies, notably belt tensioning and load limiting systems, together with advanced airbags, has proven very effective in providing occupant protection in these crash modes. Recently, however, concern has been raised over the contribution of narrower frontal impacts, involving primarily the vehicle corners, to the incidence of fatality and serious injury as a result of the potential for increased occupant compartment intrusion and performance limitations of current restraint systems. Drawing on data documented in the National Automotive Sampling System (NASS)/ Crashworthiness Data System (CDS) for calendar years 1999 to 2012, the present study examines the characteristics of existing and proposed corner crash test configurations, and the nature of real-world collisions that approximate the test environments. In this analysis, particular emphasis is placed on crash pulse information extracted from vehicle-based event data recorders (EDR's).