Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (55)
- Buch (Monographie) (15)
- Bericht (1)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (72) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Analyse (math) (72) (entfernen)
Zur Ermittlung einer Mehr- oder Minderbeanspruchung des Straßenoberbaus durch Lang-Lkw wurde eine Stichprobe von 1.746 Fahrten im Direktverkehr und 483 Fahrten im kombinierten Verkehr analysiert. Die durchschnittliche Fahrzeuggesamtmasse der Lang-Lkw betrug 32,3 t. Ca. 9 % der Lang-Lkw fuhren überladen. Das Niveau der Überladungen lag jeweils unterhalb 3 t. Die maximale Achslast betrug 11,7 t. Die Achslastverteilung von Lang-Lkw im kombinierten Verkehr weist ein niedrigeres Niveau als für Lang-Lkw im Direktverkehr auf. Im Vergleich zu äquivalenten konventionellen Lkw ergibt sich für Lang-Lkw eine um 5 % niedrigere Anzahl äquivalenter 10-t-Achsen. Der mittlere Achszahlfaktor fA von Lang-Lkw beträgt 7,40. Das Transportvolumen eines Lang-Lkw entspricht rechnerisch dem Transportvolumen von 1,53 äquivalenten konventionellen Lkw. Mit zunehmendem Anteil Lang-Lkw am Gesamtkollektiv Schwerverkehr (bis zu 9 %) ist eine zunehmende, vergleichsweise geringe Reduzierung der B-Zahl nach RStO 12 zu verzeichnen, was in der Regel jedoch nicht zu einem Wechsel in die nächstkleinere Belastungsklasse führen würde. Mittels Dimensionierung nach RDO Asphalt 09 errechnet sich bei Einsatz von Lang-Lkw nach dem Ende einer 30-jährigen Nutzungsdauer der Straßenbefestigung ein geringfügig niedrigerer Ermüdungsstatus, der zu einer marginalen Verlängerung des Nutzungszeitraums führen würde. Der Einsatz von Lang-Lkw würde unter Einhaltung der im Feldversuch definierten fahrzeugtechnischen Vorgaben und zulässigen Grenzwerte für Fahrzeuggesamtgewichte und Achslasten nicht zur Mehrbeanspruchung des Oberbaus von Straßen führen. Die rechnerisch festgestellte Minderbeanspruchung des Oberbaus im Vergleich zu konventionellen Lkw hat nur marginale Bedeutung und würde sich somit in der Praxis kaum spürbar auf die Nutzungsdauer der Straßen auswirken.
Die Regelwerke RABT 2006 beziehungsweise 2004/54/EG legen heute die einheitlichen Mindestanforderungen an die Ausstattung und den Betrieb von Straßentunneln in Deutschland fest. Wird von diesen Anforderungen in begründeten Fällen abgewichen oder weist ein Tunnel eine besondere Charakteristik auf, so ist durch eine Risikoanalyse aufzuzeigen, dass durch den Einsatz alternativer Maßnahmen ein vergleichbar hohes Sicherheitsniveau gewährleistet werden kann. Um die in den Richtlinien genannte Forderung zu konkretisieren und eine praktische Umsetzung zu ermöglichen, wurde eine quantitative Methodik zur Sicherheitsbewertung von Straßentunneln entwickelt. Als Grundlage für die Herleitung der erforderlichen statistischen Eingangsgrößen wurden im Rahmen einer Unfallanalyse für 80 Tunnel rund 1'000 Unfallprotokolle spezifisch ausgewertet. Mit der Methodik können die Vorgaben für eine einheitliche und vergleichbare Durchführung von Sicherheitsbeurteilungen geschaffen werden. Bei der Entwicklung der Methodik wurden die Erfahrungen aus anderen, vergleichbaren Sicherheitsbereichen herangezogen und die entsprechenden Ansätze auf ihre Tauglichkeit hin für eine Anwendung im vorliegenden Kontext geprüft. Daneben wurden die aktuellen Entwicklungen und methodischen Ansätze zur Umsetzung der Forderungen gemäß Artikel 13 der Richtlinie 2004/54/EG im Ausland analysiert und die entsprechenden Erkenntnisse soweit sinnvoll in die Entwicklung der Methodik einbezogen. Die Methodik basiert in ihren Grundsätzen und dem gewählten Vorgehen auf einem risikoorientierten Ansatz, der er in verschiedenen Ländern zu unterschiedlichsten Sicherheitsfragen bereits erfolgreich angewandt wird. Bei der Erarbeitung der Methodik wurde darauf geachtet, dass der gewählte Ansatz neben der Erarbeitung der wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen im Hinblick auf die künftige Anwendung auch einen engen praxisorientierten Bezug aufweist. Die Methodik gibt aber bewusst nicht zu allen Aspekten "rezeptartige" Vorgaben vor, sondern definiert einen Rahmen, innerhalb dessen die konkrete Anwendung durchzuführen ist. Für das Regelwerk wurden Empfehlungen zum weiteren Vorgehen abgegeben sowie weiterer Forschungsbedarf aufgezeigt, welcher insbesondere die Aspekte der Risikobewertungskriterien sowie der Datengrundlagen betrifft. Um die Suche innerhalb des Berichtes zu erleichtern, wird dieser zusätzlich noch einmal auf der beiliegenden CD angeboten. Sie enthält darüber hinaus die Anlagen und den Bericht in englischer Sprache.
Still correlated with high mortality rates in traffic accidents traumatic aortic ruptures were frequently detected in unprotected car occupants in the early years. This biomechanical analysis investigates the different kinds of injury mechanisms leading to traumatic aortic injuries in todays traffic accidents and how the way of traffic participation affects the frequency of those injuries over the years. Based on GIDAS reported traffic accidents from 1973 to 2014 are analyzed. Results show that traumatic aortic injuries are mainly observed in high-speed accidents with high body deceleration and direct load force to the chest. Mostly chest compression is responsible for the load direction to the cardiac vessels. The main observed load vector is from caudal-ventral and from ventral solely, but also force impact from left and right side and in roll-over events with chest compression lead to traumatic aortic injuries. Classically, the injury appeares at the junction between the well-fixed aortic arch and the pars decendens following a kind of a scoop mechanism, a few cases with a hyperflexion mechanism are also described. In our analysis the deceleration effect alone never led to an aortic rupture. Comparing the past 40 years aortic injuries shift from unprotected car occupants to today's unprotected vulnerable road users like pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists. Still the accident characteristics are linked with chest compression force under high speed impact, no seatbelt and direct body impact.
Causation of traffic accidents with children from the perspective of all involved participants
(2017)
In the year 2014 about 2,800 children between zero and 14 years got injured due to traffic accidents in Austria. More than 50% were taking part in traffic as active road users like cyclists or pedestrians. Within this study 46 real world traffic accidents between vehicles and children as pedestrians were analysed. In 39 cases, car drivers hit the crossing children. In the other cases, the collision opponents were busses, trucks or motorcycles. Most of the children got hit while crossing a road at urban sites. By analysing the traffic accidents from the perspectives of all involved participants, vehicle drivers and injured children, it is possible to identify factors for each participant, which led to the accident and factors that contributed the accident. The main task is to find patterns in the behaviour of crash victims (children and driver) before the collision. One important fact is that in more than 50% of the analysed cases sight obstructions were an important contributing factor for both, the driver and the child. From drivers view situations in which the child moved unexpected into the driven road lane were often found. For the injured child, factors like: no attention to the road traffic or no sufficient traffic observation were found to be relevant. Further it- possible to sensitise children and adults to possible source of critical traffic situations according to the findings of this study.
The national accident statistics demonstrate that the situation of passenger car side impacts is dominated by car to car accidents. Car side to pole impacts are relatively infrequent events. However the importance of car side to pole impacts is significantly increasing with fatal and seriously injured occupants. For the present study the German in-depth database GIDAS (German In-Depth-Accident Study) and the UK based database CCIS (Co-operative Crash Injury Study) were used. Two approaches were undertaken to better understand the scenario of car to pole impacts. The first part is a statistical analysis of passenger car side to pole impacts to describe the characteristics and their importance relevant to other types of impact and to get further knowledge about the main factors influencing the accident outcome. The second part contains a case by case review on passenger cars first registered 1998 onwards to further investigate this type of impact including regression analysis to assess the relationship between injury severity and pole impact relevant factors.
This paper uses the national accident statistics of Great Britain to evaluate the effectiveness of Electronic Stability Control Systems (ESC) to reduce crash involvement rates. The crash experience of 8,951 cars is analysed and compared to a closely matching set of non-ESC cars using case-control methods. This is one of the largest ESC samples analysed to date. Overall the cars with ESC are involved in 3% fewer crashes although the effectiveness is substantially higher under conditions of adverse road friction. ESC equipped cars are involved in 15% fewer fatal crashes although this reduction represents the combined effect of ESC and passive safety improvements.
The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in car occupant injury severity recorded in AIS 2005 compared to AIS 1990 and to outline the likely effects on future data analysis findings. Occupant injury data in the UK Cooperative Crash Injury Study Database (CCIS) were coded for the period February 2006 to November 2007 using both AIS 1990 and AIS 2005. Data for 1,994 occupants with over 6000 coded injuries were reviewed at the AIS and MAIS level of severities and body regions to determine changes between the two coding methodologies. Overall there was an apparent general trend for fewer injuries to be coded at the AIS 4+ severity and more injuries to be coded at the AIS 2 severity. When these injury trends were reviewed in more detail it was found that the body regions which contributed the most to these changes in severity were the head, thorax and extremities. This is one of the first studies to examine the implications for large databases when changing to an updated method for coding injuries.
In order to enable foreseeing or comparing the benefit of safety systems or driver assistance systems in Germany, in the United States and in Japan, the traffic accident databases in those three countries are examined. The variables used are culpable party, collision partner, accident type, and injury level and the method to re-classify the databases for comparison are proposed. The result indicates that single passenger car fatality is the most frequent in Germany and in the United States, while passenger car vs. pedestrian is the most frequent fatality scenario in Japan. When the casualty by fatality ratio is focused, the greatest difference is observed in rear-end collisions. The ratio of slight injuries in Japan yields about eighteen times as many as those in Germany, and about eight times as many as those in the United States.
Crash involvement studies using routine accident and exposure data : a case for case-control designs
(2009)
Fortunately, accident involvement is a rare event: the chance of an individual road user trip to end up in a crash is close to zero. Thus, according to general epidemiological principles one can expect the case-control study design to be especially suitable for quantifying the relative risk (odds ratio) of accident involvement of road users with a certain risk factor as compared to road users that do not have this characteristic. Ideally, of course, the database for such a case-control study should be established by drawing two independent random samples of cases (accidental units) and controls (nonaccidental units), respectively. If, however, special data collection is not an option, it is nevertheless possible to analyze routine accident and exposure data under a case-control design in order to fully exploit the information contained in already existing databases. As a prerequisite, accident and exposure data from different sources are to be combined in a single file of micro or grouped data in a way consistent with the case-control study design. Among other things, the proposed methodological approach offers the possibility to use in-depth data of the GIDAS type also in investigations of active vehicle safety by combining this data with appropriate vehicle trip data collected in mobility surveys.
SEEKING is looking for answers regarding electric powered bicycles and their relation to traffic safety issues. Does a cyclist need "E"? Is it as risky as riding a moped or are E-bikes creating conflicts with other cyclists? The project described herein, funded by the Austrian Ministry of Transport, has the aim of seeking answers to these hot topics. The SEEKING-team shows an in-depth investigation of vehicle dynamic sensing, together with subjective feedback of test riders to detect similarities and differences between conventional cycling and E-biking. Following an overview on the international status quo, measurement runs and their analyses are performed to find a set of preventative measures to make (E-)biking safer. A specific focus is the detection of curve handling, stopping and acceleration phases as well as conflict studies on course-based test rides and "real world" tests on cycling paths (naturalistic riding).