Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Conference (39)
- Konferenz (39)
- Accident (30)
- Unfall (30)
- Germany (25)
- Deutschland (24)
- Injury (23)
- Verletzung (22)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (18)
- Severity (accid, injury) (16)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (15)
- Statistics (12)
- Statistik (12)
- Analysis (math) (11)
- Cyclist (10)
- Data acquisition (10)
- Datenerfassung (10)
- Radfahrer (10)
- Accident reconstruction (9)
- Datenbank (9)
- Fußgänger (9)
- Pedestrian (9)
- Analyse (math) (8)
- Car (8)
- Cause (8)
- Ursache (8)
- Data bank (7)
- Driver (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- On the spot accident investigation (7)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (7)
- injury) (7)
- Motorcyclist (6)
- Motorradfahrer (6)
- Reconstruction (accid) (6)
- Severity (accid (6)
- Europa (5)
- Europe (5)
- Fatality (5)
- Interview (5)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (5)
- Tödlicher Unfall (5)
- Verletzung) (5)
- Zusammenstoß (5)
- Accident rate (4)
- Collision (4)
- Geschwindigkeit (4)
- Head (4)
- Human factor (4)
- Menschlicher Faktor (4)
- PKW (4)
- Pkw (4)
- Safety belt (4)
- Schutzhelm (4)
- Sicherheitsgurt (4)
- Simulation (4)
- Speed (4)
- Wirbelsäule (4)
- Accident prevention (3)
- Anfahrversuch (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Biomechanics (3)
- Biomechanik (3)
- Brustkorb (3)
- China (3)
- Crash helmet (3)
- Fracture (bone) (3)
- Impact test (veh) (3)
- Knochenbruch (3)
- Kopf (3)
- Spinal column (3)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (3)
- Unfallverhütung (3)
- Use (3)
- Age (2)
- Alte Leute (2)
- Alter (2)
- Analyse (Math) (2)
- Angle (2)
- Bewertung (2)
- Bicycle (2)
- Blickfeld (2)
- Child (2)
- Digital model (2)
- Error (2)
- Evaluation (assessment) (2)
- Fahranfänger (2)
- Fahrrad (2)
- Fahrzeug (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Field of vision (2)
- Finite element method (2)
- Front (2)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (2)
- Head on collision (2)
- Kind (2)
- Leg (human) (2)
- Numerisches Modell (2)
- Old people (2)
- Overturning (veh) (2)
- Recently qualified driver (2)
- Risiko (2)
- Risk (2)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (2)
- Side impact (2)
- Vehicle (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Winkel (2)
- Überschlagen (2)
- Acceptability (1)
- Aggression (psycho) (1)
- Aggression (psychol) (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Airbag (1)
- Alcohol (1)
- Alkohol (1)
- Anthropometric dummy (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Australia (1)
- Australien (1)
- Back (human) (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Bein (1)
- Bein (menschl) (1)
- Bemessung (1)
- Berechnung (1)
- Blutkreislauf (1)
- Breaking (1)
- Bremsung (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Calculation (1)
- Cervical vertebrae (1)
- Chest (1)
- Circulation (blood) (1)
- Compression (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Cost (1)
- Crash victim (1)
- Cycle track (1)
- Cycling (1)
- Data base (1)
- Database (1)
- Deformation (1)
- Design (overall design) (1)
- Deutschalnd (1)
- Development (1)
- Digital image processing (1)
- Digitale Bildverarbeitung (1)
- Disablement (1)
- Drei (1)
- Droge (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Durchsichtigkeit (1)
- Dynamics (1)
- Dynamik (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emergency medical aid (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Erste Hilfe (1)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (1)
- Fahrzeugsitz (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Frequenz (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Gesundheit (1)
- Halswirbel (1)
- Health (1)
- Hospitsl (1)
- Human body (1)
- Illness (1)
- Impact (collision) (1)
- Insasse (1)
- Interactive model (1)
- Interaktives Modell (1)
- Interior (veh) (1)
- International (1)
- Japan (1)
- Junction (1)
- Knee (human) (1)
- Knie (menschl) (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kosten (1)
- Krankenhaus (1)
- Krankheit (1)
- Körperstellung (1)
- Langfristig (1)
- Length (1)
- Lkw (1)
- Location (1)
- Long term (1)
- Lorry (1)
- Länge (1)
- Lärm (1)
- Mathematical model (1)
- Menschlicher Körper (1)
- Methode der finite Elemente (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Model (not math) (1)
- Modell (1)
- Movement (1)
- Noise (1)
- Norm (tech) (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Pfosten (1)
- Pole (1)
- Post crash (1)
- Posture (1)
- Properties (1)
- Protective helmet (1)
- Psychological aspects (1)
- Psychologische Gesichtspunkte (1)
- Radfahren (1)
- Radweg (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Rechenmodell (1)
- Reversing (veh) (1)
- Rib (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Risk taking (1)
- Road user (1)
- Rupture (1)
- Rücken (1)
- Rücksichtslosigkeit (1)
- Rückwärtsfahren (1)
- Safety (1)
- Seat (veh) (1)
- Severity (accid, injuy) (1)
- Sicherheit (1)
- Specification (standard) (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Spinal calum (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Thorax (1)
- Three (1)
- Transparent (1)
- USA (1)
- Unfallfolgemaßnahme (1)
- Unfallopfer (1)
- Unfallrate (1)
- Ungeschützter Verkehrsteilnehmer (1)
- Vehicle occupant (1)
- Verformung (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (1)
- Verschiebung (1)
- Versuchspuppe (1)
- Vulnerable road user (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- accident (1)
- Überlappung (1)
Institut
- Sonstige (43) (entfernen)
This contribution introduces a number of psychological methods of analysis that are based on the practice-oriented collection of information directly at the site of an accident and that allow for an analysis and coding of the accident causes. Investigation examples and examples of the data combinations with basic medical and technical data are outlined. Objective of the collection is the inter-disciplinary investigation of human factors in the causes of accidents ("human-factor-analysis"). The psychological data are incorporated according to an integrative model for accident causes based on empiric algorithms in the data base of the accident research, where the clustered evaluation potential of comprehensive factors of the accident development can be illustrated. The central theoretical concept for the basic model of the progress of the accident from a psychological point of view comprises psychological indicators for the evaluation of the site of the accident for the analysis of the perception conditions as well as a classification of the gleaned data into the accident progress model according to chronological and local criteria. Perception conditions, action intentions and executions as well as conditions limiting perception and actions are acquired, using a questionnaire for persons involved in an accident, and are also integrated into the data structure concerning weighted feature characteristics as well as combined with other relevant features. Suitable systematization tools for the collection and coding of psychological accident development parameters have to be provided, which require primarily a model image of the corresponding processes from the persons involved in the accident (perceptions, expectations, decisions, actions). The interactive accident model contains components of the models by KÜTING 1990, MC DONALD 1972, SURREY 1969 and RASMUSSEN 1980. Based on the inter-action of the three partial systems "person", "vehicle" and "environment", the first step is the assessment of the situation by the persons involved in the accident. This is dependent on the personal attitudes and motives, on experiences and expectations concerning the progress of the situation. Subsequently, data concerning the manner of the coping with the ambiguous state as well as with the instable state (emergency reaction immediately before the accident occurs) are collected. The factors relating to the persons involved in the accident are gathered on several levels using corresponding questionnaires. The coding of the found and collected characteristics is conducted in a multidimensional evaluation relating to the technical results of the accident reconstruction and of the psychological classification, which are subsequently integrated in coded form into the data base of the accident research. The result of this analysis is a description of the development of the accident depicted on a chronological vector from a perception and decision theoretical perspective. This is explained in detail using exemplary cases.
Es wurden Unfälle, die im Rahmen des Forschungsprojektes "Erhebungen am Unfallort" dokumentiert wurden, hinsichtlich der Häufigkeit und der Charakteristik von Pkw-Mehrfachkollisionen analysiert. Beschrieben wurden bei einer vergleichenden Gegenüberstellung von Einfach- und Mehrfachkollisionen die Besonderheiten, die die Mehrfachkollisionen prägen, und zwar im Vorfeld des Unfallgeschehens wie auch im Unfallgeschehen selbst. Mit allen beobachteten Unterschieden der Merkmalsausprägungen ist eine Steigerung der Ausgangsgeschwindigkeit, also der Geschwindigkeit, die vor dem Unfallgeschehen gefahren wurde, verbunden. Die Entstehungswahrscheinlichkeit von Mehrfachkollisionen steigt mit der Zunahme der Fahrgeschwindigkeiten. Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede sind lediglich für die Wahl der Ausgangsgeschwindigkeiten vor dem Unfallereignis von Bedeutung. Keine Rolle spielen Fahrzeugeigenschaften bei der Entstehung von Mehrfachkollisionen. Bei Mehrfachkollisionen wurde häufig beobachtet, dass Pkw seitlich mit Objekten am Straßenrand (Leitplanke, Bäume etc.) zusammenstoßen. Bei Seitenkollisionen treten überdurchschnittlich schwere Fahrzeugdeformationen sowie schwere Verletzungen am Kopf, im Thoraxbereich und an den oberen Extremitäten auf. Die Rekonstruktion von Mehrfachkollisionen wird durch ein oftmals komplexes Spuren- und Deformationsbild erschwert. Hilfreich erweisen sich fotogrammetrische Verfahren wie Stereoaufnahmen und Draufsichtfotografie.
The purpose of this study was to analyse the actual injury situation of bicyclists regarding accidents involving more than one bicyclist. Bicyclists were included in a medical and technical analysis to create a basis for preventive measures and discovered repeating accident patterns and circumstances such as daytime, environment, helmet use rate. Technical and medical data were collected at the scene, shortly after accident. The population was compared focusing on bicycle versus bicycle accidents. Technical analysis included speed at crash, type of collision, impact angle, environment, used lane and relative velocity. Medical analysis included injury pattern and severity (AIS, ISS). Included were 578 injured bicyclists in 289 accidents from years 1999 to 2008, 61 percent were male (n=350) and 39 percent female (n=228). Sixty-seven percent ranged between 18 to 64 years of age, twelve percent each between 13 to 17 years of age and older than 65 years, eight percent between 6 to 12 years and one percent between 2 to 5 years.. Crashes took place in urban areas in 92 percent, in rural areas in 8 percent. Weather conditions were dry lanes in 97 percent and wet conditions in 3 percent. Eighty-three percent of all accidents happened during daytime, ten percent during night, and seven percent during dawn. The helmet use rate was only 7,5 percent in all involved bicyclists. The mean Maximum Abbreviated injury scale, Injury severity score was 1,31. Bicyclists are still minimally- or unprotected road users. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. The incidence of bicycle to bicycle crashes is high. Most of these accidents take place in urban areas. The level and pattern of injuries is moderate. Most of the more severe injuries occur to the head and could have been avoided by frequent helmet use.
Still correlated with high mortality rates in traffic accidents traumatic aortic ruptures were frequently detected in unprotected car occupants in the early years. This biomechanical analysis investigates the different kinds of injury mechanisms leading to traumatic aortic injuries in todays traffic accidents and how the way of traffic participation affects the frequency of those injuries over the years. Based on GIDAS reported traffic accidents from 1973 to 2014 are analyzed. Results show that traumatic aortic injuries are mainly observed in high-speed accidents with high body deceleration and direct load force to the chest. Mostly chest compression is responsible for the load direction to the cardiac vessels. The main observed load vector is from caudal-ventral and from ventral solely, but also force impact from left and right side and in roll-over events with chest compression lead to traumatic aortic injuries. Classically, the injury appeares at the junction between the well-fixed aortic arch and the pars decendens following a kind of a scoop mechanism, a few cases with a hyperflexion mechanism are also described. In our analysis the deceleration effect alone never led to an aortic rupture. Comparing the past 40 years aortic injuries shift from unprotected car occupants to today's unprotected vulnerable road users like pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists. Still the accident characteristics are linked with chest compression force under high speed impact, no seatbelt and direct body impact.
The national accident statistics demonstrate that the situation of passenger car side impacts is dominated by car to car accidents. Car side to pole impacts are relatively infrequent events. However the importance of car side to pole impacts is significantly increasing with fatal and seriously injured occupants. For the present study the German in-depth database GIDAS (German In-Depth-Accident Study) and the UK based database CCIS (Co-operative Crash Injury Study) were used. Two approaches were undertaken to better understand the scenario of car to pole impacts. The first part is a statistical analysis of passenger car side to pole impacts to describe the characteristics and their importance relevant to other types of impact and to get further knowledge about the main factors influencing the accident outcome. The second part contains a case by case review on passenger cars first registered 1998 onwards to further investigate this type of impact including regression analysis to assess the relationship between injury severity and pole impact relevant factors.
This study aimed at comparing head Wrap Around Distance (WAD) of Vulnerable Road User (VRU) obtained from the German in-depth Accident Database (GIDAS), the China in-depth Accident Database (CIDAS) and the Japanese in-depth Accident Database (ITARDA micro). Cumulative distribution of WAD of pedestrian and cyclist were obtained for each database (AIS2+) showing that WAD of cyclists were larger than the ones of pedestrians. Comparing three regions, the 50%tile WAD of GIDAS was larger than that of both Asian accident databases. Using linear regression that might predict WAD of pedestrians and cyclists from Impact speed and VRU height, WADs were calculated to be 206cm/219cm (Pedestrian/Cyclist) for GIDAS, 170cm/192cm for CIDAS and 211cm/235cm for ITARDA. In addition, this study may be helpful for reconsideration of WAD measurement alignment between accident reconstruction and test procedures.
Since a number of human models have been developed it appears sensible to use these models also in the accident analysis. Especially the understanding of injury mechanisms and probably even injury risk curves can be significantly improved when interesting accidents are reconstructed using human body models. However, an important limitation for utilising human models for accident reconstruction is the effort needed to develop detailed FE models of the accident partners or to prepare the human model reconstruction by running physical accident reconstructions. The proposed approach for using human models for accident reconstruction is to use simplified and parametric car models. These models can be adapted to the crash opponents in a fast and cost effective way. Although, accuracy is less compared to detailed FE models, the relevant change in velocity can be simulated well, indicating that the computation of a detailed crash pulse is not needed. Two frontal impact test accidents that were reconstructed experimentally and using the parametric car models are indicating sufficient correlation of the adapted parametric car models with the full scale crash reconstructions. However, further developments of the parametric models to be capable for the use in lateral impacts and rear impacts are needed. For the PC Crash simulation runs the output sampling rate is too large to allow sufficient analysis. In addition the performance appears to be too general.
Although the statistics show a decreasing rate of child injuries and fatalities in German road accidents more efforts can be made to protect children in cars e.g. by developing appropriate child restraint systems. An important part in of this work can be achieved with the help of crash tests using child dummies. However these crash tests cannot completely reflect the situation of real world crashes as factors like children moving out of the optimal position or children incorrectly fastened by their parents are difficult to predict. Therefore this study gives an overview over the current accident and injury situation of child occupants in cars in German road accidents.
Within the COST Action TU1101 the working group WG 1 is dealing with acceptance criteria and problems in helmet use while bicycling concerning conspicuity, thermal stress, ventilation deficits and other potential confounding. To analyze the helmet usage practice of bicyclists in Europe a questionnaire was developed in the scope of working group 1 to collect relevant information by means of a field study. The questionnaire consists of some 66 questions covering the fields of personal data of the cyclist, riding und helmet usage habits, information concerning the helmet model and the sensation of the helmet, as well as information on previous bicycle accidents. A second complementary study is conducted to analyze if the use of a bicycle helmet influences the seating geometry and the posture of cyclists when riding a bicycle and if the if the helmet vertically limits the vision. For this purpose cyclists with and without helmets were photographed in real world situations and relevant geometrical values such as the decline of the torso, the head posture of the upper vertical vision limit due to the helmet were established from the photos. The interim results of the field studies which were conducted in Germany by the Hannover Medical School are presented in this study. Some 227 questionnaires were filled out, of which 67 participants had used a helmet and 42 of the 227 participants have had a bicycle accident before. For the analysis of the riding position and posture of the cyclist over 40 pictures of riders with a helmet and over 240 pictures of riders without a helmet were measured concerning the seating geometry to describe the influence of using a bicycle helmet. Some results in summary: From the riders interviewed with the questionnaire only 11% of the city bike riders and 12% of the mountain bike riders always used the helmet, while 38% of the racing bike riders and 88% of the e-bike-riders always used the helmet. The helmet use seems not to change the sensation of safety of cycling compared to the use of a car. The arguments for not wearing a helmet are mostly stated to be the short distance of a trip, high temperatures or carelessness and waste of time. The reasons for using a helmet are stated to be the feeling of safety and being used to using a helmet. Being a role model for others was also stated to be a reason for helmet use. Concerning the sensation of the helmet 9% of the riders reported problems with the field of vision when using a helmet, 57% saw the problem of sweating too much, and 10% reported headaches or other unpleasant symptoms like pressure on the forehead when using the helmet. The analysis of the seating posture from the pictures taken of cyclists revealed that older cyclists generally have a riding position where the handle bar is higher than the seat (0-° to 10-° incline from seat to handlebar), while younger riders had a higher variance (between -10-° decline and 20-° incline). Further, elderly riders and riders with helmets seem to have a more upright position of the upper body when cycling. The vertical vision limit due to the helmet is determined by the front rim of the helmet (mostly the sun shade). Typical values here range from 0-° (horizontal line from the eye to the sun shade) to 75-° upwards, in which elderly riders tend to have a slightly higher vertical vision limit possibly due to the helmet being worn more towards the face.
Since its beginning in 1999, the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) evolved into the presumably leading representative road traffic accident investigation in Europe, based on the work started in Hanover in 1973. The detailed and comprehensive description of traffic accidents forms an essential basis for vehicle safety research. Due to the ongoing extension of demands of researchers, there is a continuous progress in the techniques and systematic of accident investigation within GIDAS. This paper presents some of the most important developments over the last years. Primary vehicle safety systems are expected to have a significant and increasing influence on reducing accidents. GIDAS therefore began to include and collect active safety parameters as new variables from the year 2005 onwards. This will facilitate to assess the impact of present and future active safety measures. A new system to analyse causation factors of traffic accidents, called ACASS, was implemented in GIDAS in the year 2008. The whole process of data handling was optimised. Since 2005 the on-scene data acquisition is completely conducted with mobile tablet PCs. Comprehensive plausibility checks assure a high data quality. Multi-language codebooks are automatically generated from the database structure itself and interfaces ensure the connection to various database management systems. Members of the consortium can download database and codebook, and synchronize half a terabyte of photographic documentation through a secured online access. With the introduction of the AIS 2005 in the year 2006, some medical categorizations have been revised. To ensure the correct assignment of AIS codes to specific injuries an application based on a diagnostic dictionary was developed. Furthermore a coding tool for the AO classification was introduced. All these enhancements enable GIDAS to be up to date for future research questions.