Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (48) (entfernen)
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (48) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Bewertung (16)
- Evaluation (assessment) (16)
- Anfahrversuch (15)
- Conference (15)
- Konferenz (15)
- Test method (15)
- Impact test (veh) (14)
- Prüfverfahren (14)
- Dummy (13)
- Anthropometric dummy (12)
- Injury (12)
- Safety (12)
- Sicherheit (12)
- Verletzung (12)
- Fußgänger (11)
- Pedestrian (11)
- Accident (10)
- Collision (10)
- Unfall (10)
- Driver assistance system (9)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (9)
- Head on collision (9)
- Zusammenstoß (9)
- Analyse (math) (8)
- Analysis (math) (8)
- Biomechanics (8)
- Biomechanik (8)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (8)
- Simulation (8)
- Radfahrer (7)
- Cyclist (6)
- Fahrzeug (6)
- Head (6)
- Kopf (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (6)
- Severity (accid, injury) (6)
- Verletzung) (6)
- injury) (6)
- Car (5)
- Child (5)
- Deutschland (5)
- Europa (5)
- Europe (5)
- Germany (5)
- Kind (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Vehicle (5)
- Alte Leute (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Compatibility (4)
- Deformation (4)
- Driver (4)
- Fahrer (4)
- Impact test (4)
- Improvement (4)
- Insasse (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Kompatibilität (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Passive safety system (4)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (4)
- Severity (accid (4)
- Side impact (4)
- Standardisierung (4)
- Standardization (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Vehicle occupant (4)
- Verbesserung (4)
- Accident prevention (3)
- Autonomes Fahren (3)
- Autonomous driving (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Bemessung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Braking (3)
- Bremsung (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (3)
- Design (overall design) (3)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (3)
- Fatality (3)
- Gesetzgebung (3)
- Interior (veh) (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Old people (3)
- Pkw (3)
- Statistics (3)
- Statistik (3)
- Tödlicher Unfall (3)
- Unfallverhütung (3)
- Use (3)
- Verformung (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Airbag (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Aufprallschlitten (2)
- Automatic (2)
- Automatisch (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Behaviour (2)
- Belastung (2)
- Cervical vertebrae (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Database (2)
- Datenbank (2)
- Development (2)
- Driver information (2)
- Entwicklung (2)
- Error (2)
- Fahrerinformation (2)
- Fahrstabilität (2)
- Fahrzeugsitz (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Forschungsarbeit (2)
- Front (2)
- Halswirbel (2)
- Hospital (2)
- Human body (2)
- Impact sled (2)
- Intelligent transport system (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Krankenhaus (2)
- Load (2)
- Menschlicher Körper (2)
- Modification (2)
- Motorcycle (2)
- Motorrad (2)
- Research project (2)
- Safety belt (2)
- Seat (veh) (2)
- Severity (acid (2)
- Sicherheitsgurt (2)
- Spinal column (2)
- Technologie (2)
- Technology (2)
- Test (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Vehicle handling (2)
- Verhalten (2)
- Versuch (2)
- Veränderung (2)
- Wirbelsäule (2)
- (menschl) (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Active safety system (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anthropmetric dummy (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Apparatus (measuring) (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Ausrüstung (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Bein (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Cadaver (1)
- Cause (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Communication (1)
- Cost benefit analysis (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Datenerfassung (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Detection (1)
- Detektion (1)
- Driving (veh) (1)
- Durability (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Empfindlichkeit (1)
- Equipment (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugführung (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Foot (not a measure) (1)
- Frau (1)
- Fuß (1)
- Gewicht (1)
- Haftung (jur) (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interface (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knie (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Kraftfahrzeug (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Leichnam (1)
- Liability (1)
- Mathematical model (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Messgerät (1)
- Messung (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Norm (tech) (1)
- On the spot accident investigation (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Prototyp (1)
- Prototype (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Rechenmodell (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Risiko (1)
- Risk (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Schnittstelle (1)
- Schutz (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Seite (1)
- Sensitivity (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Side (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Spain (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Specification (standard) (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (1)
- Stress (psychol) (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Traffic regulations (1)
- USA (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (1)
- Ursache (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle regulations (1)
- Verhütung (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Weight (1)
- Windschutzscheibe (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zusammenstoss (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (48) (entfernen)
Supported by field accident data and monitoring results of European Regulation (EC) No. 78/2009, recent plans of the European Commission regarding a way forward to improve passive safety of vulnerable road users include, amongst other things, an extension of the head test area. The inclusion of passive cyclist safety is also being considered by Euro NCAP. Although passenger car to cyclist collisions are often severe and have a significant share within the accident statistics, cyclists are neither considered sufficiently in the legislative nor in the consumer ratings tests. Therefore, a test procedure to assess the protection potential of vehicle fronts in a collision with cyclists has been developed within a current research project. For this purpose, the existing pedestrian head impact test procedures were modified in order to include boundary conditions relevant for cyclists as the second big group of vulnerable road users. Based on an in-depth analysis of passenger car to cyclist accidents in Germany the three most representative accident constellations have been initially defined. The development of the test procedure itself was based on corresponding simulations with representative vehicle and bicycle models. In addition to different cyclist heights, reaching from a 6-year-old child to a 95%-male, also four pedal positions were considered. By reconstruction of a real accident the defined simulation parameters could be validated in advance. The conducted accident kinematics analysis shows for a large portion of the constellations an increased head impact area, which can reach beyond the roof leading edge, as well as high average values for head impact velocity and angle. Based on the simulation data obtained for the different vehicle models, cyclist-specific test parameters for impactor tests have been derived, which have been further examined in the course of head and leg impact tests. In order to study the cyclist accident kinematics under real test conditions, different full scale tests with a Polar-II dummy positioned on a bicycle have been conducted. Overall, the tests showed a good correlation with the simulations and support the defined boundary test conditions. Typical accident scenarios and simulations reveal higher head impact locations, angles and velocities. An extended head impact area with modified test parameters will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users including cyclists. However, due to significantly differing impact kinematics and postures between the lower extremities of pedestrians and cyclists, these injuries cannot be addressed by the means of current test tools such as the flexible pedestrian legform impactor FlexPLI. Based on the findings obtained within the project as well as the existing pedestrian protection requirements a cyclist protection test procedure for use in legislation and consumer test programmes has been developed, whose requirements have been transferred into a corresponding test specification. This specification provides common head test boundary conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, whereby the existing requirements are modified and two parallel test procedures are avoided.
According to the German road traffic regulations children up to the age of 12 or a height below 150 cm have to use approved and appropriate child restraint systems (CRS). CRS must be approved according to UN-ECE Regulation No. 44. The regulation classifies CRS in 5 weight categories. The upper weight group is approved for children from 22 to 36 kg. However, studies show that already today many children weigh more than 36 kg although they have not reached a height of 150 cm. Therefore, no ECE R44 approved CRS is available for these overweight children. In conclusion, today's sizes and weights of children are no longer represented by the current version of the ECE R44. The heaviest used dummy (P10) weighs just 32.6 kg and has a height of 137.9 cm. Statistical data of German children show that already 5% of the children at a height of 137.9 cm have a weight above 45.3 kg. Regarding children at a height of 145 cm, the 95th percentile limit is at a weight of 53.3 kg. Based on these data 4 dummies with different heights and weights were defined and produced. Two of them are overweight. Up to now, there is no experience how current child restraint systems perform in a car crash if they are used by children with a weight above 36 kg and a height smaller than 150 cm. In the future, different child restraint systems will be tested with respect to the ECE R44 regulation using these overweight dummies.
The use of proper child restraint systems (CRS) is mandatory for children travelling in cars in most countries of the world. The analysis of the quantity of restrained children shows that more than 90% of the children in Germany are restrained. Looking at the quality of the protection, a large discrepancy between restrained and well protected children can be seen. Two out of three children in Germany are not properly restrained. In addition, considerable difference exists with respect to the technical performance of CRS. For that reason investigations and optimisations on two different topics are necessary: The technical improvement of CRS and the ease of use of CRS. Consideration of the knowledge gained by the comparison of different CRS in crash tests would lead to some improvements of the CRS. But improvement of child safety is not only a technical issue. People should use CRS in the correct way. Misuse and incorrect handling could lead to less safety than correct usage of a poor CRS. For that reason new technical issues are necessary to improve the child safety AND the ease of use. Only the combination of both parts can significantly increase child safety. For the assessment of the safety level of common CRS, frontal and lateral sled tests simulating different severity levels were conducted comparing pairs of CRS which were felt to be good and CRS which were felt to be poor. The safety of some CRS is currently at a high level. All well known products were not damaged in the performed tests. The performance of non-branded CRS was mostly worse than that of the well known products. Although the branded child restraint systems already show a high safety level it is still possible to further improve their technical performance as demonstrated with a baby shell and a harness type CRS.
Proposal for a test procedure of assistance systems regarding preventive pedestrian protection
(2011)
This paper is showing a proposal for a test procedure regarding preventive pedestrian protection based on accident analysis. Over the past years pedestrian protection has become an increasing importance also during the development phase of new vehicles. After a phase of focusing on secondary safety, there are current activities to detect a possible collision by assistance systems. Such systems have the task to inform the driver and/or automatically activate the brakes. How practical is such a system? In which kind of traffic situations will it work? How is it possible to check the effectiveness of such a system? To test the effectiveness, currently there are no generally approved identifiable procedures. It is reasonable that such a test should be based on real accidents. The test procedure should be designed to test all systems, independent of the system- working principle. The vFSS group (advanced Forward-looking Safety Systems) was founded to develop a proposal for a technology independent test procedure, which reflects the real accident situation. This contribution is showing the results of vFSS. The developed test procedure focuses on accidents between passenger cars and pedestrians. The results are based on analysis results of in-depth databases of GIDAS, German insurers and DEKRA and added by analysis of national and international statistics. The in-depth analysis includes many pre-crash situations with several influencing factors. The factors are e. g. speed of the car, speed of the pedestrian, moving direction and a possible obscuration of the pedestrian by an object. The results comprise also the different situations of adults and children. Furthermore, they include details regarding influence of the lighting conditions (daylight or night) especially with respect to the accident consequences. In fact, more accidents happen at daylight, but fatal accidents are more often at night. A clustering of parameter combinations was found which represents typical accident scenarios. There are six typical accident scenarios which were merged in four test scenarios. The test scenarios are varying the starting position of the pedestrian, the pedestrian size (adult or child) and the speed of the pedestrian, whereas the speed of the car will not be varied. To ensure the independency from used sensing technologies it is necessary to use a suitable dummy. For example, if sensors are based on infrared, the dummy should emit the temperature of a human being. The test procedure will identify the collision speed as the key parameter for assessing the effectiveness of the tested system. The collision speed is defined as the reduction between initial test speed of the car and impact speed. The assessment of the speed reduction value regarding the safety benefit, however, will be part of a separate procedure.
To improve vehicle safety in frontal collisions, the crash compatibility between the colliding vehicles is crucial. Compatibility aims to improve both the self and partner protection properties of vehicles. Although compatibility has received worldwide attention for many years, no final assessment approach has been defined. Within the Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research (FIMCAR) project, different frontal impact test procedures (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test as currently used for Economic Commission for Europe [ECE] R94, progressive deformable barrier test as proposed by France for a new ECE regulation, moveable deformable barrier test as discussed worldwide, full-width rigid barrier test as used in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard [FMVSS] 208, and full-width deformable barrier test) were analyzed regarding their potential for future frontal impact legislation. The research activities focused on car-to-car frontal impact accidents based on accident investigations involving newer cars. Test procedures were developed with both a crash test program and numerical simulations. The proposal from FIMCAR is to use a full-width test procedure with a deformable element and compatibility metrics in combination with the current offset test as a frontal impact assessment approach that also addresses compatibility. By adding a full-width test to the current ODB test it is possible to better address the issues of structural misalignment and injuries resulting from high acceleration accidents as observed in the current fleet. The estimated benefit ranges from a 5 to 12 percent reduction of fatalities and serious injuries resulting from frontal impact accidents. By using a deformable element in the full-width test, the test conditions are more representative of real-world situations with respect to acceleration pulse, restraint system triggering time, and deformation pattern of the front structure. The test results are therefore expected to better represent real-world performance of the tested car. Furthermore, the assessment of the structural alignment is more robust than in the rigid wall test.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
The strong prevalence of human error as a crash causation factor in motorcycle accidents calls for countermeasures that help tackling this issue. Advanced rider assistance systems pursue this goal, providing the riders with support and thus contributing to the prevention of crashes. However, the systems can only enhance riding safety if the riders use them. For this reason, acceptance is a decisive aspect to be considered in the development process of such systems. In order to be able to improve behavioural acceptance, the factors that influence the intention to use the system need to be identified. This paper examines the particularities of motorcycle riding and the characteristics of this user group that should be considered when predicting the acceptance of advanced rider assistance systems. Founded on theories predicting behavioural intention, the acceptance of technologies and the acceptance of driver support systems, a model on the acceptance of advanced rider assistance systems is proposed, including the perceived safety when riding without support, the interface design and the social norm as determinants of the usage intention. Since actual usage cannot be measured in the development stage of the systems, the willingness to have the system installed on the own motorcycle and the willingness to pay for the system are analyzed, constituting relevant conditions that allow for actual usage at a later stage. Its validation with the results from user tests on four advanced rider assistance systems allows confirming the social norm and the interface design as powerful predictors of the acceptance of ARAS, while the extent of perceived safety when riding without support did not have any predictive value in the present study.
A means of assessing the passive safety of automobiles is a desirable instrument for legislative bodies, the automobile industry, and the consumer. As opposed to the dominating motor vehicle assessment criteria, such as engine power, spaciousness, aerodynamics and consumption, there are no clear and generally accepted criteria for assessing the passive safety of cars. The proposed method of assessment combines the results of experimental safety tests, carried out according to existing legally prescribed or currently discussed testing conditions, and a biomechanical validation of the loading values determined in the test. This evaluation is carried out with the aid of risk functions which are specified for individual parts of the body by correlating the results of accident analysis with those obtained by computer simulation. The degree of conformance to the respective protection criterion thus deduced is then weighted with factors which take into account the frequency of occurrence and the severity of the accident on the basis of resulting costs. Each of the test series includes at least two frontal and one lateral crash test against a deformable barrier. The computer-aided analysis and evaluation of the simulation results enables a vehicle-specific overall safety index as well as partial and individual safety values to be determined and plotted graphically. The passive safety provided by the respective vehicle under test can be defined for specific seating positions, special types of accident, or for individual endangered parts of the body.
PROSPECT (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) is a collaborative research project involving most of the relevant partners from the automotive industry (including important active safety vehicle manufacturers and tier-1 suppliers) as well as academia and independent test labs, funded by the European Commission in the Horizon 2020 research program. PROSPECT's primary goal is the development of novel active safety functions, to be finally demonstrated to the public in three prototype vehicles. A sound benefit assessment of the prototype vehicle's functionality requires a broad testing methodology which goes beyond what has currently been used. Since PROSPECT functions are developed to prevent accidents in intersections, a key aspect of the test methodology is the reproduction of natural driving styles on the test track with driving robots. For this task, data from a real driving study with subjects in a suburb of Munich, Germany was used. Further data from Barcelona will be available soon. The data suggests that intersection crossing can be broken down into five phases, two phases with straight deceleration / acceleration, one phase with constant radius and speed turning, and two phases where the bend is imitated or ended. In these latter phases, drivers mostly combine lateral and longitudinal accelerations and drive what is called a clothoid, a curve with curvature proportional to distance travelled, in order to change lateral acceleration smoothly rather than abrupt. The data suggests that the main parameter of the clothoid, the ratio distance travelled to curvature, is mostly constant during the intersections. This parameter together with decelerations and speeds allows the generation of synthetic robot program files for a reproduction of natural driving styles using robots, allowing a much greater reproducibility than what is possible with human test drivers. First tests show that in principle it is possible to use the driving robots for vehicle control in that manner; a challenge currently is the control performance of the robot system in terms of speed control, but it is anticipated that this problem will be solved soon. Further elements of the PROSPECT test methodology are a standard intersection marking to be implemented on the test track which allows the efficient testing of all PROSPECT test cases, standard mobile and light obstruction elements for quick reproduction of obstructions of view, and a concept for tests in realistic surroundings. First tests using the PROSPECT test methodology will be conducted over the summer 2017, and final tests of the prototype vehicles developed within PROSPECT will be conducted in early 2018
The head impact of pedestrians in the windscreen area shows a high relevance in real-world accidents. Nevertheless, there are neither biomechanical limits nor elaborated testing procedures available. Furthermore, the development of deployable protection systems like pop-up bonnets or external airbags has made faster progress than the corresponding testing methods. New requirements which are currently not considered are taken into account within a research project of BASt and the EC funded APROSYS (Advanced PROtection SYStems) integrated project relating to passive pedestrian protection. Testing procedures for head impact in the windscreen area should address these new boundary conditions. The presented modular procedure combines the advantages of virtual testing, including full-scale multi-body and finite element simulations, as well as hardware testing containing impactor tests based on the existing procedures of EEVC WG 17. To meet the efforts of harmonization in legislation, it refers to the Global Technical Regulation of UNECE (GTR No. 9). The basis for this combined hardware and virtual testing procedure is a robust categorization covering all passenger cars and light commercial vehicles and defining the testing zone including the related kinematics. The virtual testing part supports also the choice of the impact points for the hardware test and determines head impact timing for testing deployable systems. The assessment of the neck rotation angle and sharp edge contact in the rear gap of pop-up bonnets is included. For the demonstration of this procedure, a hardware sedan shaped vehicle was modified by integrating an airbag system. In addition, tests with the Honda Polar-II Dummy were performed for an evaluation of the new testing procedure. Comparing these results, it was concluded that a combination of simulation and updated subsystem tests forms an important step towards enhanced future pedestrian safety systems considering the windscreen area and the deployable systems.