91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (164) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (100)
- Konferenz (97)
- Germany (53)
- Deutschland (52)
- Accident (48)
- Unfall (48)
- Safety (44)
- Sicherheit (44)
- Fahrzeug (38)
- Vehicle (36)
- Simulation (34)
- Anfahrversuch (33)
- Bewertung (33)
- Evaluation (assessment) (33)
- Active safety system (31)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (30)
- Fußgänger (30)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (30)
- Pedestrian (30)
- Impact test (veh) (28)
- Test method (27)
- Collision (26)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (26)
- Injury (26)
- Passive safety system (26)
- Prüfverfahren (26)
- Verletzung (26)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (25)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (25)
- Severity (accid, injury) (24)
- Analyse (math) (23)
- Car (23)
- Zusammenstoß (23)
- Analysis (math) (22)
- Driver assistance system (22)
- Accident prevention (21)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (20)
- Unfallverhütung (20)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (19)
- Verletzung) (19)
- injury) (19)
- Efficiency (18)
- Head on collision (18)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (18)
- Severity (accid (18)
- Anthropometric dummy (17)
- Reconstruction (accid) (17)
- Versuch (17)
- Datenbank (16)
- Dummy (16)
- Test (16)
- Driver (14)
- Pkw (14)
- Europa (13)
- Europe (13)
- Fahrer (13)
- Radfahrer (13)
- Child (12)
- Data bank (12)
- Insasse (12)
- Kind (12)
- Statistics (12)
- Cyclist (11)
- On the spot accident investigation (11)
- Prevention (11)
- Statistik (11)
- Antikollisionssystem (10)
- Biomechanics (10)
- Biomechanik (10)
- Collision avoidance system (10)
- Improvement (10)
- Vehicle occupant (10)
- Verbesserung (10)
- Autonomes Fahren (9)
- Autonomous driving (9)
- Development (9)
- Entwicklung (9)
- Forschungsarbeit (9)
- Research project (9)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (9)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (9)
- Vehicle regulations (9)
- Accident reconstruction (8)
- Auffahrunfall (8)
- Automatisch (8)
- International (8)
- Kompatibilität (8)
- Lorry (8)
- Method (8)
- Side impact (8)
- Standardisierung (8)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (8)
- Verfahren (8)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (8)
- Automatic (7)
- Compatibility (7)
- Cost benefit analysis (7)
- Datenerfassung (7)
- Fahrzeugsitz (7)
- Fehler (7)
- Geschwindigkeit (7)
- Head (7)
- Kopf (7)
- PKW (7)
- Rear end collision (7)
- Risiko (7)
- Sicherheitsgurt (7)
- Speed (7)
- Verhütung (7)
- Verminderung (7)
- Alte Leute (6)
- Bemessung (6)
- Benutzung (6)
- Braking (6)
- Bremsung (6)
- Cause (6)
- Data acquisition (6)
- Decrease (6)
- Deformation (6)
- Design (overall design) (6)
- Error (6)
- Fahrstabilität (6)
- Fatality (6)
- Interior (veh) (6)
- Knee (human) (6)
- Lkw (6)
- Mathematical model (6)
- Motorrad (6)
- Official approval (6)
- Rechenmodell (6)
- Risk (6)
- Road user (6)
- Safety belt (6)
- Seat (veh) (6)
- Standardization (6)
- Tödlicher Unfall (6)
- Ursache (6)
- Use (6)
- Vehicle handling (6)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (6)
- Überschlagen (6)
- Airbag (5)
- Aufprallschlitten (5)
- Body (car) (5)
- Brustkorb (5)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (5)
- EU (5)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (5)
- Gesetzgebung (5)
- Impact sled (5)
- Impact test (5)
- Interview (5)
- Karosserie (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Motorcycle (5)
- Old people (5)
- Policy (5)
- Politik (5)
- Prognose (5)
- Sensor (5)
- Technologie (5)
- Technology (5)
- Thorax (5)
- Verformung (5)
- Behaviour (4)
- Bremse (4)
- Cervical vertebrae (4)
- Database (4)
- Detection (4)
- Digital model (4)
- Driver information (4)
- Electronic stability program (4)
- Fahrzeugführung (4)
- Halswirbel (4)
- Japan (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Modification (4)
- Motorcyclist (4)
- Motorradfahrer (4)
- Numerisches Modell (4)
- Overturning (veh) (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Verhalten (4)
- Accident rate (3)
- Advanced driver assistance system (3)
- Air bag (restraint system) (3)
- Attitude (psychol) (3)
- Ausrüstung (3)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (3)
- Autonomous vehicle (3)
- Baumusterzulassung (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Belastung (3)
- Berechnung (3)
- Brake (3)
- Bus (3)
- Correlation (math, stat) (3)
- Crashtest (3)
- Damage (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Delivery vehicle (3)
- Detektion (3)
- Driver training (3)
- Driving (veh) (3)
- Einstellung (psychol) (3)
- Electric vehicle (3)
- Elektrofahrzeug (3)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (3)
- Equipment (3)
- Fahranfänger (3)
- Fahrausbildung (3)
- Forecast (3)
- Front (3)
- Gewicht (3)
- Head restraint (3)
- Human body (3)
- Impact study (3)
- Intelligent transport system (3)
- Knotenpunkt (3)
- Kopfstütze (3)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (3)
- Leg (human) (3)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (3)
- Load (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Recently qualified driver (3)
- Sachschaden (3)
- Sichtbarkeit (3)
- Steering (process) (3)
- Steifigkeit (3)
- Stiffness (3)
- Straßenverkehr (3)
- Traffic (3)
- USA (3)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (3)
- United Kingdom (3)
- Unterfahrschutz (3)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (3)
- Verkehr (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Sichtbarkeit (3)
- Warning (3)
- Warnung (3)
- Weight (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Active safety (2)
- Adolescent (2)
- Age (2)
- Aktive Sicherheit (2)
- Alter (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (2)
- Arbeitsgruppe (2)
- Automatische Notbremsung (2)
- Autonomous emergency braking (2)
- Bicyclist (2)
- Bremsweg (2)
- Calculation (2)
- Classification (2)
- Coach (2)
- Data security (2)
- Datensicherheit (2)
- Dynamics (2)
- Dynamik (2)
- Effectiveness (2)
- Electronic driving aid (2)
- Elektronische Fahrhilfe (2)
- Empfindlichkeit (2)
- Entdeckung (2)
- Erste Hilfe (2)
- Estimation (2)
- Fahrdatenschreiber (2)
- Fahrerinformation (2)
- Feuer (2)
- Fire (2)
- First aid (2)
- Form (2)
- France (2)
- Frankreich (2)
- Frau (2)
- Headlamp (2)
- Highway traffic (2)
- Hinten (2)
- Individueller Verkehr (2)
- Information (2)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (2)
- Intersection (2)
- Jugendlicher (2)
- Kamera (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Kontrolle (2)
- Kraftfahrzeug (2)
- LKW (2)
- Landstraße (2)
- Lieferfahrzeug (2)
- Location (2)
- Measurement (2)
- Messung (2)
- Nacht (2)
- Night (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- Occupant (veh) (2)
- Ort (Position) (2)
- Passenger (2)
- Perception (2)
- Post crash (2)
- Private transport (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Rear (2)
- Regression analysis (2)
- Regressionsanalyse (2)
- Reifen (2)
- Reisebus (2)
- Restraint system (2)
- Richtlinien (2)
- Risikobewertung (2)
- Risk assessment (2)
- Road network (2)
- Rural road (2)
- Sample (mater) (2)
- Scheinwerfer (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Schweden (2)
- Seite (2)
- Sensitivity (2)
- Side (2)
- Spain (2)
- Spanien (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Specifications (2)
- Spinal column (2)
- Straßennetz (2)
- Surveillance (2)
- Technische Vorschriften (2)
- Tyre (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallverhuetung (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Untersuchung am unfallort (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Wahrnehmung (2)
- Windschutzscheibe (2)
- Wirbelsäule (2)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (2)
- Working group (2)
- Zulassung (tech) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- Ablenkung (psychol) (1)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (1)
- Accident data (1)
- Accompanied driving (1)
- Accuracy (1)
- Active safety system; Automatic; Brake; Car; Collision avoidance system; Conference; Driver assistance system; Germany; Impact test (veh); Rear end collision; Severity (accid (1)
- Activity report (1)
- Adaptive cruise control (1)
- Administration (1)
- Adult (1)
- Advanced vehicle control systems (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Airbag (restraint system) (1)
- Angle (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Atives Sicherheitssystem (1)
- Attention (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Aufzeichung (1)
- Austria (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Befreiung (Bergung) (1)
- Begleitetes Fahren (1)
- Benefit cost analysis (1)
- Bewehrung (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bildschirm (1)
- Blickfeld (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Braking distance (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Budget (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Camera (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Clothing (1)
- Collision test (veh) (1)
- Comfort (1)
- Communication (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Components of the vehicle (1)
- Compression (1)
- Computation (1)
- Construction (1)
- Contact (tyre (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Crash Test (1)
- Crash helmet (1)
- Crash test (1)
- Cross roads (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Customer (1)
- Damping (1)
- Data collection (1)
- Data processing (1)
- Data transmission (1)
- Datenverarbeitung (1)
- Datenübertragung (telekom) (1)
- Dauer (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Demand (econ) (1)
- Demographie (1)
- Deutschland ; Konferenz (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital computer (1)
- Digitalrechner (1)
- Displacement (1)
- Distraction (1)
- Driver experience (1)
- Driving (1)
- Driving aid (electronic) (1)
- Dtetection (1)
- Durability (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- Dämpfung (1)
- EU directive (1)
- EU-Richtlinie (1)
- Echtzeit (1)
- Education (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Eins (1)
- Ejection (1)
- Electric bicycle (1)
- Elektrofahrrad (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogram (1)
- Emission control (1)
- Emissionskontrolle (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Environment protection (1)
- Ergonomics (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- Erziehung (1)
- Eu (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- European Union (1)
- Event data recorder (Road vehicle) (1)
- Event data recorder (road vehicle) (1)
- Extrication (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrer ; Fahrerassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrerinformationen (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrsimulator (1)
- Fahrstreifen (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Fahrzeugdach (1)
- Fahrzeugflotte (1)
- Fahrzeugteil (Sicherheit) (1)
- Fahrzeugteile (1)
- Failure (1)
- Field of vision (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fleet of vehicles (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Geometry (shape) (1)
- Gesetzesdurchführung (1)
- Gestaltung (1)
- Government (national) (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Harmonisation (1)
- Harmonisierung (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Hazard (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Herausschleudern (1)
- Highway (1)
- Homogeneity (1)
- Homogenität (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Human machine interface (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- Inertia reel safety belt (1)
- Information documentation (1)
- Information management (1)
- Injury) (1)
- Installation (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interactive model (1)
- Interaktives Modell (1)
- Itinerary (1)
- Junction (1)
- Kleidung (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Komfort (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Kreuzung (1)
- Kunde (1)
- Kunststoff (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Lap strap (1)
- Lateral collision (1)
- Law enforcement (1)
- Layout (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (Allg.) (1)
- Leuchtdichte (1)
- Limit (1)
- Luminance (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Massenunfall (1)
- Matrix (1)
- Mensch Maschine Schnittstelle (1)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (1)
- Messgerät (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Mobilität (1)
- Model (not math) (1)
- Modell (1)
- Montage (1)
- Moped (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Multiple collision (1)
- Nachfrage (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Nasse Straße (1)
- Naturalistic Driving (1)
- Naturalistic driving (1)
- Nigeria (1)
- On the scene accident investigation (1)
- One (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Output (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Overturning (1)
- Passive restraint system (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Plastic material (1)
- Police (1)
- Polizei (1)
- Population (1)
- Portugal (1)
- Probability (1)
- Probe (1)
- Properties (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Prüfkörper (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Quality (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualität (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radar (1)
- Radio (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Real time (1)
- Rear view mirror (1)
- Recording (1)
- Reduction (decrease) (1)
- Reflectorized material (1)
- Reflexstoffe (1)
- Regierung (staat) (1)
- Reifenprofil (1)
- Reinforcement (in mater) (1)
- Reiseweg (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road (1)
- Road traffic (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Roll over (veh) (1)
- Roof (veh) (1)
- Rotation (1)
- Route guidance (1)
- Rundfunk (1)
- Rückspiegel (1)
- Safety harness (1)
- Safety system (1)
- Schlag (1)
- Schleudertrauma (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzhelm (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Seat (1)
- Seat belt (1)
- Seat harness (1)
- Severity (accid, injuy) (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shock (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Simulator (driving) (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Stochastic process (1)
- Stochastischer Prozess (1)
- Stopping distance (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Straße (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Sweden (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Teenage driver (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telefon (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telephone (1)
- Tension (1)
- Tests (1)
- Time (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic lanes (1)
- Train (1)
- Transport infrastructure (1)
- Tunnel (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- Tyre tread (1)
- Tätigkeitsbericht (1)
- Umweltschutz (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfalldaten (1)
- Unfallfolgemaßnahme (1)
- Unfallfolgephase (1)
- Unfallverhütug (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Untersuchung am Umfallort (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Usa (1)
- Vehicle Regulations (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle safety (1)
- Vehicle safety device (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreichl (1)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Vermeidung (1)
- Verschiebung (1)
- Versuchspuppe (1)
- Verwaltung (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Visual display (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Wahrscheinlichkeit (1)
- Wet road (1)
- Whiplash injury (1)
- Window (veh) (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Women (1)
- Zeit (1)
- Zielführungssystem (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zug (mech) (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- ZusammenstoÃüï-¿-½Ãƒ-¯Ã‚-¿Ã‚-½ (1)
- efficiency (1)
- head (1)
- road) (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Österreich (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
The presentation deals with the simulation tool rateEFFECT which intends to answer the following questions: Which active safety systems should be developed to maximize safety benefit in real traffic accidents? What is the effectiveness of a specific active safety system in the real world? How many casualties could be avoided by such a system? It is shown that a lot of information is required to simulate existing accidents in order to estimate ADAS effects. This particularly includes numerical values for the pre-crash and in-crash phase. The database GIDAS provides a required minimum number of these parameters for a statistically significant sample.
Qualität von on-trip Verkehrsinformationen im Straßenverkehr : BASt-Kolloquium 23. und 24.03.2011
(2011)
Am 23. und 24. März 2011 veranstaltete die Bundesanstalt fuer Straßenwesen ein, um die Ergebnisse der erwähnten Projekte und Initiativen präsentieren zu lassen und mit anderen Experten zu diskutieren. Der vorliegende Tagungsband fasst die Ergebnisse des Kolloquiums zur "Qualität von on-trip Verkehrsinformationen" zusammen. Die Bereitstellung von Verkehrsinformationen ist geprägt von vielen Akteuren. Die Wertschöpfungskette beginnt bei der Sammlung grundlegender Verkehrsdaten zur Erstellung von Verkehrsinformationen und setzt sich mit der Datenverarbeitung und -interpretation bis hin zur Meldungserstellung fort. Die Weitergabe kann über verschiedene Übertragungsmedien erfolgen und beim Nutzer (z.B. im Navigationsgerät) empfangen werden. Jeder einzelne Schritt der Wertschoepfungskette kann sowohl von unterschiedlichen Partnern (privat oder öffentlich) übernommen werden als auch in der Hand eines Partners liegen. Diese Komplexität der Zusammenarbeit spiegelt sich demzufolge auch in Qualitätsmanagementprozessen wider. Im Rahmen des Kolloquiums wurden zwei wesentliche Qualitätsaspekte näher betrachtet: - die Datenqualität mit dem Focus auf Aktualitaet, Stimmigkeit der Daten verglichen mit einer gemessenen Realitaet sowohl zu Beginn der Wertschöpfungskette als auch an jeglichen Schnittstellen, - die Prozessqualität, welche sich insbesondere mit der reibungslosen Datenübergabe an den Schnittstellen der Wertschoepfungskette beschäftigt. Beide Qualitätsaspekte helfen zu verstehen, worin die heutigen Qualitätsprobleme bestehen und welche Massnahmen im Einzelnen ergriffen werden müssten, um eine nachhaltige Verbesserung zu erreichen. Einerseits kann es vorkommen, dass die Information über ein Verkehrsereignis an einer oder mehreren Stellen der Wertschöpfungskette korrekt vorliegt, jedoch durch ungenuegende technische oder organisatorische Schnittstellen im Prozessablauf wieder verloren geht und dem Nutzer folglich nicht zur Verfügung steht. Prominentes Beispiel eines solchen Problems in der Prozessqualität ist die fehlerhafte Interpretation der Meldung im Navigationsgerät, denkbar sind solche Informationsverluste jedoch an jeder Stelle der Wertschoepfungskette. Eine wichtige Massnahme zur Verbesserung der Prozessqualität ist die Standardisierung sowie die Überprüfung, ob die definierten Standards an jeder Stelle der Wertschöpfungskette eingehalten werden. Andererseits kann es vorkommen, dass die Datenqualität in Bezug auf ihre Genauigkeit von Anfang an so schlecht ist, dass der Nutzer eine fehlerhafte oder gar keine Nachricht übermittelt bekommt. Beispiel hierfür ist die Vielzahl von Stauereignissen, die entweder nicht gesendet wurden oder gesendet wurden, obwohl sie nicht vorhanden waren. Eine wichtige Massnahme zur Verbesserung dieser Situation ist die Verbesserung der Ereignisdetektion. Der Tagungsband enthaelt Präsentationen, die den Status Quo analysieren, Methoden zur verbesserten Datenerfassung vorschlagen und Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung von Daten- und Prozessqualität vorstellen. Offen geblieben sind darüber hinaus folgende Fragestellungen: - Wie kann die Prozessqualität der gesamten Wertschöpfungskette bei der Vielzahl der Partner kontrolliert werden? Wer überwacht die Wertschöpfungskette? Wird hierfuer überhaupt eine zentrale Stelle benötigt? Oder ist es ausreichend, wenn jeder Partner eine angemessene Eingangs bzw. Ausgangskontrolle durchführt? - Obwohl es nur eine Realität gibt, entsteht doch Wettbewerb über die (Qualität der) Information zu dieser Realität. Wie kann Konsistenz zwischen allen Anbietern von sicherheitsrelevanten Informationen erreicht werden? Wo sollte der Wettbewerb enden und wie kann dies technisch, organisatorisch und wirtschaftlich realisiert werden? - Welche Prozesse sollten geschaffen werden, um Partner zu integrieren, die sich nicht an geschaffene Qualitätsstandards halten (z.B. kommerzielle Diensteanbieter, die nicht mit der Verkehrsinformationsszene vernetzt sind)? - Und nicht zuletzt, wie kann die Wahrnehmung des Nutzers über verschiedene Qualitätslevel unterschiedlicher Produkte verbessert werden? Ist der Nutzer in der Lage, die unterschiedlichen Qualitätsstufen von Verkehrssystemen zu unterscheiden? Falls nicht, welche Art von Unterstuetzung braucht der Kunde? Ein "European Information Services Assessment Programme" vergleichbar zu Euro NCAP für Fahrzeuge? Die Ergebnisse des Kolloquiums sollen die laufende Diskussion um die Verbesserung der Qualität von Verkehrsinformationen unterstützen.
Für eine Reihe von EU Regelungen im Bereich Fahrzeugsicherheit erlaubt eine Verordnung bereits seit dem Jahr 2010 virtuelles Testen für die Typzulassungsprüfung. Technische Details bzw. konkrete Prozeduren für spezifische Regelungen sind in dieser Verordnung jedoch nicht enthalten. Das Hauptziel des europäischen Projekts IMVITER (lmplementation of Virtual Testing in Safety Regulations) war es, basierend auf der neuen Verordnung ein virtuelles Testverfahren auszuarbeiten und dabei offene Fragen zu berücksichtigen. Um die im Projekt-Konsortium unter Berücksichtigung der Anliegen aller Interessensgruppen wie Autohersteller, Zulassungsbehörden und technischer Dienste erarbeiteten offenen Punkte zu adressieren, wurde ein generisches Flussdiagramm entwickelt, das den Ablauf einer virtuell basierten Typprüfung darstellt. ln diesem Diagramm ist der virtuelle Typgenehmigungsprozess in drei aufeinander folgende Phasen aufgeteilt, die Verifikations-, Validierungs- und Typgenehmigungsphase. Von entscheidender Bedeutung ist die Phase der Validierung des Simulationsmodells, für die im IMVITER-Projekt eine Methodik vorgeschlagen wurde. Mit der im Projekt vorgeschlagenen Validierungsmethode ist kein Austausch des Simulationsmodells zwischen Fahrzeughersteller und technischem Dienst notwendig, so dass die Vertraulichkeit von Betriebsgeheimnissen nicht gefährdet ist. Zur Validierung des Modells werden jedoch immer Versuche notwendig sein. Dies gilt sowohl für die Überpruefung von passiven als auch aktiven Fahrzeugsicherheitssystemen. Eine zusammenfassende Betrachtung der Erfahrungen aus dem IMVITER-Projekt ergab, dass mit der Einführung von virtuellem Testen keine Erhöhung der Anforderungen an die Fahrzeugsicherheit bzgl. bestehender Regelungen verbunden sein sollte. Jedoch werden auch weiterhin neue zusäztliche Regelungen erforderlich sein, da sich das Unfallgeschehen und die Fahrzeugtechnologie weiterentwickeln und ändern werden. Diese sollten von Beginn an die Möglichkeiten des virtuellen Testens nutzen, insbesondere bei Testverfahren für neue Technologien, z.B. aktiver Fahrzeugsicherheitssysteme. Hier bieten virtuelle Testverfahren nicht nur eine Kosten- oder Zeitersparnis, sondern ermöglichen teilweise erst die sinnvolle Abprüfung von neuen Sicherheitssystemen, die mit aktuellen auf Hardware-Test basierenden Verfahren überhaupt nicht möglich wären.
According to the German road traffic regulations children up to the age of 12 or a height below 150 cm have to use approved and appropriate child restraint systems (CRS). CRS must be approved according to UN-ECE Regulation No. 44. The regulation classifies CRS in 5 weight categories. The upper weight group is approved for children from 22 to 36 kg. However, studies show that already today many children weigh more than 36 kg although they have not reached a height of 150 cm. Therefore, no ECE R44 approved CRS is available for these overweight children. In conclusion, today's sizes and weights of children are no longer represented by the current version of the ECE R44. The heaviest used dummy (P10) weighs just 32.6 kg and has a height of 137.9 cm. Statistical data of German children show that already 5% of the children at a height of 137.9 cm have a weight above 45.3 kg. Regarding children at a height of 145 cm, the 95th percentile limit is at a weight of 53.3 kg. Based on these data 4 dummies with different heights and weights were defined and produced. Two of them are overweight. Up to now, there is no experience how current child restraint systems perform in a car crash if they are used by children with a weight above 36 kg and a height smaller than 150 cm. In the future, different child restraint systems will be tested with respect to the ECE R44 regulation using these overweight dummies.
The use of proper child restraint systems (CRS) is mandatory for children travelling in cars in most countries of the world. The analysis of the quantity of restrained children shows that more than 90% of the children in Germany are restrained. Looking at the quality of the protection, a large discrepancy between restrained and well protected children can be seen. Two out of three children in Germany are not properly restrained. In addition, considerable difference exists with respect to the technical performance of CRS. For that reason investigations and optimisations on two different topics are necessary: The technical improvement of CRS and the ease of use of CRS. Consideration of the knowledge gained by the comparison of different CRS in crash tests would lead to some improvements of the CRS. But improvement of child safety is not only a technical issue. People should use CRS in the correct way. Misuse and incorrect handling could lead to less safety than correct usage of a poor CRS. For that reason new technical issues are necessary to improve the child safety AND the ease of use. Only the combination of both parts can significantly increase child safety. For the assessment of the safety level of common CRS, frontal and lateral sled tests simulating different severity levels were conducted comparing pairs of CRS which were felt to be good and CRS which were felt to be poor. The safety of some CRS is currently at a high level. All well known products were not damaged in the performed tests. The performance of non-branded CRS was mostly worse than that of the well known products. Although the branded child restraint systems already show a high safety level it is still possible to further improve their technical performance as demonstrated with a baby shell and a harness type CRS.
Proposal for a test procedure of assistance systems regarding preventive pedestrian protection
(2011)
This paper is showing a proposal for a test procedure regarding preventive pedestrian protection based on accident analysis. Over the past years pedestrian protection has become an increasing importance also during the development phase of new vehicles. After a phase of focusing on secondary safety, there are current activities to detect a possible collision by assistance systems. Such systems have the task to inform the driver and/or automatically activate the brakes. How practical is such a system? In which kind of traffic situations will it work? How is it possible to check the effectiveness of such a system? To test the effectiveness, currently there are no generally approved identifiable procedures. It is reasonable that such a test should be based on real accidents. The test procedure should be designed to test all systems, independent of the system- working principle. The vFSS group (advanced Forward-looking Safety Systems) was founded to develop a proposal for a technology independent test procedure, which reflects the real accident situation. This contribution is showing the results of vFSS. The developed test procedure focuses on accidents between passenger cars and pedestrians. The results are based on analysis results of in-depth databases of GIDAS, German insurers and DEKRA and added by analysis of national and international statistics. The in-depth analysis includes many pre-crash situations with several influencing factors. The factors are e. g. speed of the car, speed of the pedestrian, moving direction and a possible obscuration of the pedestrian by an object. The results comprise also the different situations of adults and children. Furthermore, they include details regarding influence of the lighting conditions (daylight or night) especially with respect to the accident consequences. In fact, more accidents happen at daylight, but fatal accidents are more often at night. A clustering of parameter combinations was found which represents typical accident scenarios. There are six typical accident scenarios which were merged in four test scenarios. The test scenarios are varying the starting position of the pedestrian, the pedestrian size (adult or child) and the speed of the pedestrian, whereas the speed of the car will not be varied. To ensure the independency from used sensing technologies it is necessary to use a suitable dummy. For example, if sensors are based on infrared, the dummy should emit the temperature of a human being. The test procedure will identify the collision speed as the key parameter for assessing the effectiveness of the tested system. The collision speed is defined as the reduction between initial test speed of the car and impact speed. The assessment of the speed reduction value regarding the safety benefit, however, will be part of a separate procedure.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
A means of assessing the passive safety of automobiles is a desirable instrument for legislative bodies, the automobile industry, and the consumer. As opposed to the dominating motor vehicle assessment criteria, such as engine power, spaciousness, aerodynamics and consumption, there are no clear and generally accepted criteria for assessing the passive safety of cars. The proposed method of assessment combines the results of experimental safety tests, carried out according to existing legally prescribed or currently discussed testing conditions, and a biomechanical validation of the loading values determined in the test. This evaluation is carried out with the aid of risk functions which are specified for individual parts of the body by correlating the results of accident analysis with those obtained by computer simulation. The degree of conformance to the respective protection criterion thus deduced is then weighted with factors which take into account the frequency of occurrence and the severity of the accident on the basis of resulting costs. Each of the test series includes at least two frontal and one lateral crash test against a deformable barrier. The computer-aided analysis and evaluation of the simulation results enables a vehicle-specific overall safety index as well as partial and individual safety values to be determined and plotted graphically. The passive safety provided by the respective vehicle under test can be defined for specific seating positions, special types of accident, or for individual endangered parts of the body.
An analysis of NASS and FARS was conducted to determine crash conditions that involved injuries that are not currently being directly addressed by vehicle safety standards or by consumer information test protocols. Analysis of both field data and US NCAP tests were conducted to determine the relative safety provided by seating position and by vehicle model year. Opportunities for improvements were determined by crash categories with large populations of injuries that were not addressed by safety tests or smaller numbers that were increasing in frequency. Areas of opportunities include improved occupant restrain in rollovers, improved frontal protection for rear seat occupants and improved fire prevention in frontal and rollover crashes.
This paper set out to examine the possibilities for injury avoidance implications for older drivers in crashes, based on crash and injury patterns among older drivers and current trends in ageing in most western societies. A number of safety technologies were identified and discussed which have potential for improving vehicle older driver crash avoidance and crashworthiness. While there were some promising estimates available of the likely benefits of this technology for improving safety, it is evident that they need to be confirmed for older drivers, given their age-related disabilities and sensory limitations. Further research is urgently required to ensure that these technologies yield safety benefits without any disbenefits for older drivers.rn
From an automotive safety occupant protection standpoint, effective occupant restraint requires a system capable of providing non-injurious occupant ride down of anticipated crash forces. This is not only the case for frontal collisions, where occupant restraint is provided primarily by seatbelts and airbags, but is also critical for other crash modes such as side impacts, rear impacts, rollovers, as well as multiple impact events. In the rear impact crash mode, occupant restraint is provided primarily by the seatbacks and to some extent the seatbelts. Foundationally, therefore, what becomes fundamental to the seatback's role in rear occupant protection is its ability to contain the occupant within the seat, preventing occupant ramping, as well as preventing the seat's, and/or its occupant's, dangerous intrusion into the rear occupant's survival space where contact with rear compartment components and/ or rear seated occupants can present a significant injury risk. An analysis is presented of a series of rear impact sled testing conducted by the authors that evaluates the timing, position and extent of the front seatback's reward displacement toward and into the rear occupant compartment as well as consideration of the front seat occupant' ramping potential and its injury potential relative to the rear compartment. Additionally, three other series of testing are presented which assess various seat designs occupant retention capabilities. Lastly, a matched-pair comparison test series is presented which evaluates occupant motion in rear impact with and without use of a typical vehicle body mounted 3-point seatbelt. Discussion of restraint system performance observed in all the testing is included along with ATD biofidelity and thigh-gap considerations. The data collected and presented includes accelerometer instrumentation and high speed video analysis.
Mit der EU-Verordnung Nummer 661/2009 zur Typgenehmigung und allgemeinen Sicherheit von Kraftfahrzeugen wird von der EU für schwere Nutzfahrzeuge der Einbau von Spurverlassenswarnsystemen und automatischen Notbremssystemen vorgeschrieben. Mit dem obligatorischen Einbau der Systeme wird eine Reduktion der Abkommens- und Auffahrunfälle von Nutzfahrzeugen aus den Klassen M2, M3, N2 und N3, die auf Grund der hohen Masse der Fahrzeuge folgenschwer sind, erwartet. Als Einführungsdaten werden der 1. November 2013 für neue Fahrzeugtypen und der 1. November 2015 für neue Fahrzeuge genannt. Leistungsanforderungen beziehungsweise technische Spezifikationen, denen die Systeme genügen müssen, liegen jedoch noch nicht vor. Diese werden derzeit von einer Expertengruppe auf UN-ECE-Ebene entwickelt. Dabei wird versucht, technologieneutrale Beschreibungen für die Ausgestaltung der Systeme zu erstellen, die gleichzeitig sowohl den gewünschten Nutzen für die Verkehrssicherheit garantieren, sich aber auch an der derzeit vorhandenen und realisierbaren Technologie orientieren. Darüber hinaus müssen die Systemkosten in einem vernünftigen Verhältnis zum Sicherheitsnutzen stehen. Ziel ist es, im Laufe des Jahres 2011 Vorschläge für die Legislative vorzulegen. Es wird über den Stand der Arbeiten, offene Fragestellungen, Herausforderungen bei der Ausgestaltung der technischen Anforderungen sowie sich abzeichnende Ergebnisse berichtet. Dabei sind die Arbeiten in Bezug auf Lane Departure Warning Systems (LDWS) bereits weiter fortgeschritten als zu Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS).
PROSPECT (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) is a collaborative research project involving most of the relevant partners from the automotive industry (including important active safety vehicle manufacturers and tier-1 suppliers) as well as academia and independent test labs, funded by the European Commission in the Horizon 2020 research program. PROSPECT's primary goal is the development of novel active safety functions, to be finally demonstrated to the public in three prototype vehicles. A sound benefit assessment of the prototype vehicle's functionality requires a broad testing methodology which goes beyond what has currently been used. Since PROSPECT functions are developed to prevent accidents in intersections, a key aspect of the test methodology is the reproduction of natural driving styles on the test track with driving robots. For this task, data from a real driving study with subjects in a suburb of Munich, Germany was used. Further data from Barcelona will be available soon. The data suggests that intersection crossing can be broken down into five phases, two phases with straight deceleration / acceleration, one phase with constant radius and speed turning, and two phases where the bend is imitated or ended. In these latter phases, drivers mostly combine lateral and longitudinal accelerations and drive what is called a clothoid, a curve with curvature proportional to distance travelled, in order to change lateral acceleration smoothly rather than abrupt. The data suggests that the main parameter of the clothoid, the ratio distance travelled to curvature, is mostly constant during the intersections. This parameter together with decelerations and speeds allows the generation of synthetic robot program files for a reproduction of natural driving styles using robots, allowing a much greater reproducibility than what is possible with human test drivers. First tests show that in principle it is possible to use the driving robots for vehicle control in that manner; a challenge currently is the control performance of the robot system in terms of speed control, but it is anticipated that this problem will be solved soon. Further elements of the PROSPECT test methodology are a standard intersection marking to be implemented on the test track which allows the efficient testing of all PROSPECT test cases, standard mobile and light obstruction elements for quick reproduction of obstructions of view, and a concept for tests in realistic surroundings. First tests using the PROSPECT test methodology will be conducted over the summer 2017, and final tests of the prototype vehicles developed within PROSPECT will be conducted in early 2018
The head impact of pedestrians in the windscreen area shows a high relevance in real-world accidents. Nevertheless, there are neither biomechanical limits nor elaborated testing procedures available. Furthermore, the development of deployable protection systems like pop-up bonnets or external airbags has made faster progress than the corresponding testing methods. New requirements which are currently not considered are taken into account within a research project of BASt and the EC funded APROSYS (Advanced PROtection SYStems) integrated project relating to passive pedestrian protection. Testing procedures for head impact in the windscreen area should address these new boundary conditions. The presented modular procedure combines the advantages of virtual testing, including full-scale multi-body and finite element simulations, as well as hardware testing containing impactor tests based on the existing procedures of EEVC WG 17. To meet the efforts of harmonization in legislation, it refers to the Global Technical Regulation of UNECE (GTR No. 9). The basis for this combined hardware and virtual testing procedure is a robust categorization covering all passenger cars and light commercial vehicles and defining the testing zone including the related kinematics. The virtual testing part supports also the choice of the impact points for the hardware test and determines head impact timing for testing deployable systems. The assessment of the neck rotation angle and sharp edge contact in the rear gap of pop-up bonnets is included. For the demonstration of this procedure, a hardware sedan shaped vehicle was modified by integrating an airbag system. In addition, tests with the Honda Polar-II Dummy were performed for an evaluation of the new testing procedure. Comparing these results, it was concluded that a combination of simulation and updated subsystem tests forms an important step towards enhanced future pedestrian safety systems considering the windscreen area and the deployable systems.
Neue Herausforderungen an die Unfallforschung durch Fahrerassistenz und automatisiertes Fahren
(2019)
Unfallrekonstruktion hat die Ableitung von Maßnahmen zur Minimierung der Unfallfolgen ermöglicht, vor allem durch Verbesserungen bei passiven Sicherheitseinrichtungen, aber auch durch die Verbesserung der Rettungskette, beispielsweise eCall. Heute können aktive Sicherheitssysteme die Unfallfolgen bereits vor der eigentlichen Kollision reduzieren oder durch Umfeldwahrnehmung und mittels Eingriff in die Fahrzeugsteuerung gegebenenfalls sogar vollständig verhindern. Funktionen, die aktiv in die Fahrzeugsteuerung eingreifen, lassen sich nach ihrer Wirkweise unterscheiden: zum einen handelt es sich um kontinuierlich automatisierende Funktionen, die meist länger aktiv bleiben (zum Beispiel ACC). Zum anderen um Funktionen, die in kritischen Fahrsituationen temporär in die Fahrzeugsteuerung eingreifen. Aufgezeigt wird, welche Konsequenzen und Risiken in Bezug auf diese Systeme sowie für bestimmte (zum Beispiel kritikale) Fahrsituationen anzunehmen sind. Zur Bewertung von aktiven Reglern, die in kritischen Fahrsituationen eingreifen, sind Unfalldaten nur noch eingeschränkt tauglich. Ähnliches gilt für die Bewertung von Ereignissen/ Zuständen im Rahmen kontinuierlicher Fahrzeugsteuerung, vor allem, wenn diese weiter vorausliegen. Wirkzusammenhänge automatisierter Fahrfunktionen müssen jedoch - gerade für den Mischverkehr mit konventionell gesteuerten Fahrzeugen - identifiziert werden. Dafür wird eine Szenariendatenbank mit relevanten Verkehrssituationen benötigt, in die Daten aus Naturalistic Driving Studies (NDS), aus Fahrversuchen oder Versuchen im Fahrsimulator eingehen können. Die zunehmende Durchdringung der Fahrzeugflotte mit kontinuierlich automatisierten Fahrfunktionen lässt eine Abnahme kritischer Fahrsituationen und eine Reduktion der Zahl der Verkehrsopfer erwarten. Allerdings verbleibt eine Restzahl an systemimmanenten Unfällen, die als unvermeidbar gelten müssen.
Motorcycle safety research
(2007)
Honda- global motorcycle sales exceeded the 10 million units mark since 2004, and further expansion is expected. As a responsibility for a company to provide mobility, Honda is focusing on motorcycle safety as top priority and has been working on various activities for both aspects of hardware and software. Here, we present Honda- activity for the safety technology of motorcycles. At present, Honda is promoting motorcycle safety in the four themes of prevention and collision safety such as safety education, recognition assistance, accident prevention and injury reduction. First, in the area of the safety education, the "Honda Safety Driving Promotion Center" was established in 1970, and motorcycle riders and vehicle driver trainings have been organized, and the traffic training centers are used as an actual practice field not only in Japan but also in many other regions in the world. Through our training activities, the new area of safety training with hardware assistance was developed and Honda- unique technology was accumulated such as the riding simulator which can provide experience of potentially dangerous situations without risk. Especially, the "riding trainer", the popular version of the riding simulator, was introduced at several motor shows in various countries and launched in September 2005. It was distributed first in Europe and is expected to expand globally aiming at 3000 units worldwide.. And in Europe, the newest version, which includes the suburban roads program, jointly developed with ADAC, will be released in near future. In the area of recognition assistance, "vehicle to vehicle communication technology" is under development using the advantage of being a manufacturer of both motorcycles and cars. This technology is under research as Honda "ASV-3" in Japan, and as part of C2C activity in Europe. As for the accident prevention, advanced brake systems for motorcycles to assist more effective brake operation have been expanded, Honda signed the European Road Safety Charter in April 2004 with the advanced brake systems commitment and furthermore, they are expanding according to vehicle characteristics and region. Then all models above 250 cc will have a version of the system by 2010. And as the last theme, "motorcycle airbag system" is introduced which is equipped on a mass production motorcycle for the first time in the world. It has been researched and developed for a long time as an injury reduction technology for collision accidents. Honda automobile technology was used for the research and development of the motorcycle airbag, and many specific issues such as the analysis of the collision conditions particular to motorcycles have been solved to realize today- success. It might be known that ADAC in-house crash test held in August this year confirmed the high effectiveness of the airbag system and showed a positive result. This motorcycle airbag system is equipped to the Honda Gold Wing and launched in North America in August, 2006. Also in Europe, it will be sold by the end of this year. Each theme of Honda motorcycle safety technology can be seen at the Honda booth.
Within the process of integrating passenger airbags in the vehicle fleet a problem of compatibility between the passenger airbag and rear-facing child restraint systems was recognised. Especially in the US several accidents with children killed by the passenger airbag were recorded. Taking into account these accidents the deactivation of a present passenger airbag is mandatory if a child is carried in a rear-facing child restraint system at the front passenger seat in all member states of the European Union. This rule is in force since the deadline of 2003/20/EC at the latest. In the past a passenger airbag either could not be disabled or could only be disabled by a garage. Today there are a lot of different possibilities for the car driver himself to disable the airbag. Solutions like an on/off-switch or the automatic detection of a child restraint system are mentioned as an example. Taking into account the need for the deactivation of front passenger airbags two types of misuse can occur: transportation of an infant while the airbag is (still) enabled and transportation of an adult, while the airbag is disabled, respectively. Within a research project funded by BASt both options of misuse were analysed utilising two different types of surveys amongst users (field observations and interviews, Internet-questionnaires). In addition both analysis of accident data and crash tests for an updated assessment of the injury risk caused by the front passenger airbag were conducted. Both surveys indicate a low risk of misuse. Most of the misuse cases were observed in older cars, which offer no easy way to disable the airbag. For systems, which detect a child seat automatically, no misuse could be found. The majority of misuses in cars equipped with a manual switch were caused by reasons of oblivion. Also the accident analysis indicates a minor risk of misuse. From more than 300 cases of the GIDAS accident sample that were analysed, only 24 children were using the front passenger seat in cars equipped with a front passenger airbag. In most of these cases the airbag was deactivated. When misuse occurred the injury severity was low. However, when analysing German single accidents the fatality risk caused by the front passenger airbag became obvious. From the technical point of view, there were important changes in the design of passenger airbags in recent years. Not only volume and shape were modified, but also the mounting position of the entire airbag module was changed fundamentally. Even if these findings do not allow obtaining general conclusions, a clear tendency of less danger by airbags could be identified. For future vehicle development a safe combination of airbags and rear faced baby seats seems to be possible in the long term. This would mean that both types of misuse could be eliminated. For parents an easier use of child seat and car would be the result.
The Traffic Accident Research Institute at University of Technology Dresden investigates about 1,000 accidents annually in the area around and in Dresden. These datasets have been summarized and evaluated in the GIDAS (German Accident In-Depth Study) project for 13 years. During the project it became apparent that the specific traffic situation of a covert exit of a passenger car and an intersecting two-wheeler involves a high risk potential. This critical situation develops in a large part due to the lack of visibility between the driver and the intersecting bike. In this paper the accident avoidance potential of front camera systems with lateral field of view, which allows the driver to have an indirect sight into the crossing street area will be presented.
Injury probability functions for pedestrians and bicyclists based on real-world accident data
(2017)
The paper is focusing on the modelling of injury severity probabilities, often called as Injury Risk Functions (IRF). These are mathematical functions describing the probability for a defined population and for possible explanatory factors (variables) to sustain a certain injury severity. Injury risk functions are becoming more and more important as basis for the assessment of automotive safety systems. They contribute to the understanding of injury mechanisms, (prospective) evaluation of safety systems and definition of protection criteria or are used within regulation and/or consumer ratings. In all cases, knowledge about the correlation between mechanical behavior and injury severity is needed. IRFs are often based on biomechanical data. This paper is focusing on the derivation of injury probability models from real world accident data of the GIDAS database (German In-depth Accident Study). In contrast to most academic terms there is no explicit term definition or definition of creation processes existing for injury probability models based on empirical data. Different approaches are existing for such kind of models in the field of accident research. There is a need for harmonization in terms of the used methods and data as well as the handling with the existing challenges. These are preparation of the dataset, model assumptions, censored/unknown data, evaluation of model accuracy, definition of dependent and independent variable, and others. In the presented study, several empirical, statistical and phenomenological approaches were analyzed regarding their advantages and disadvantages and also their applicability. Furthermore, the identification of appropriate prediction parameters for the injury severity of pedestrians has been considered. Due to its main effect on injuries of pedestrians and bicyclists, the importance of the secondary impact has also been analyzed. Finally, the model accuracy, evaluated by several criteria, is the rating factor that gives the quality and reliability for application of the resulting models. After the investigation and evaluation of statistical approaches one method was chosen and appropriate prediction variables were examined. Finally, all findings were summarized and injury risk functions for pedestrians in real world accidents were created. Additionally, the paper gives instructions for the interpretation and usage of such functions. The presented results include IRFs for several injury severity levels and age groups. The presented models are based on a high amount of real world accidents and describe very well the injury severity probability of pedestrians and bicyclists in frontal collisions with current vehicles. The functions can serve as basis for the evaluation of effectiveness of systems like Pedestrian-AEB or Bicycle-AEB.
This study aimed at developing an injury estimation algorithm for AACN technologies for Germany and compared them to findings based on Japanese data. The data to build and to verify the algorithm was obtained from the German in-depth Accident Database (GIDAS) and split into a training and a validation dataset. Significant input variables and the generalized linear regression model to predict severe injuries (ISS>15) were selected to maximize area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Probit regression with the input parameter multiple impact, delta v, seatbelt use and impact direction gave the largest AUC of 0.91. Sensitivity of the algorithm was validated at 90% and specificity at 76% for an injury risk threshold of 2%. It appears that no major differences between Japan and Germany exist for injury estimation based on delta v and impact direction. However, far side impact and multiple crash events appear to be associated with a larger risk increase in the German data.