91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2013 (34) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Germany (16)
- Deutschland (15)
- Anfahrversuch (12)
- Conference (12)
- Konferenz (11)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (10)
- Fahrzeug (10)
- Vehicle (10)
- Active safety system (9)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (9)
- Safety (9)
- Sicherheit (9)
- Bewertung (8)
- Evaluation (assessment) (8)
- Impact test (veh) (8)
- Passive safety system (8)
- Prüfverfahren (8)
- Test method (8)
- Driver assistance system (7)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (7)
- Pedestrian (7)
- Simulation (7)
- Collision (6)
- Fußgänger (6)
- Vehicle regulations (6)
- Zusammenstoß (6)
- Lorry (5)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (5)
- injury) (5)
- Accident (4)
- Accident prevention (4)
- Anthropometric dummy (4)
- Cost benefit analysis (4)
- Dummy (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Head (4)
- Injury (4)
- Insasse (4)
- Kopf (4)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (4)
- Severity (accid (4)
- Unfall (4)
- Unfallverhütung (4)
- Vehicle occupant (4)
- Verletzung (4)
- Verletzung) (4)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (4)
- Analyse (math) (3)
- Analysis (math) (3)
- Antikollisionssystem (3)
- Auffahrunfall (3)
- Aufprallschlitten (3)
- Belastung (3)
- Child (3)
- Collision avoidance system (3)
- Compatibility (3)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (3)
- Forschungsbericht (3)
- Impact sled (3)
- Impact test (3)
- Kind (3)
- Kompatibilität (3)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (3)
- Lkw (3)
- Load (3)
- Prevention (3)
- Reconstruction (accid) (3)
- Research report (3)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (3)
- Severity (accid, injury) (3)
- Technologie (3)
- Technology (3)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (3)
- Activity report (2)
- Ausrüstung (2)
- Automatisch (2)
- Benutzung (2)
- Biomechanics (2)
- Biomechanik (2)
- Bremse (2)
- Datenbank (2)
- Decrease (2)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (2)
- Deformation (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Equipment (2)
- Error (2)
- Europa (2)
- Europe (2)
- Fatality (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Forschungsarbeit (2)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (2)
- Gesetzgebung (2)
- Head on collision (2)
- Hinten (2)
- Improvement (2)
- Interior (veh) (2)
- Kunststoff (2)
- LKW (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Maintenance (2)
- Modification (2)
- Nachhaltige Entwicklung (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- Official approval (2)
- On the spot accident investigation (2)
- Organisation (2)
- Plastic material (2)
- Rear (2)
- Rear end collision (2)
- Research project (2)
- Road construction (2)
- Road traffic (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Sensor (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Standardisierung (2)
- Straßenbau (2)
- Straßenverkehr (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- Telematics (2)
- Telematik (2)
- Test (2)
- Traffic engineering (2)
- Transport infrastructure (2)
- Tätigkeitsbericht (2)
- Tödlicher Unfall (2)
- Unterhaltung (2)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (2)
- Use (2)
- Verbesserung (2)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (2)
- Verformung (2)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (2)
- Verkehrstechnik (2)
- Verminderung (2)
- Versuch (2)
- Active safety system; Automatic; Brake; Car; Collision avoidance system; Conference; Driver assistance system; Germany; Impact test (veh); Rear end collision; Severity (accid (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Automatic (1)
- Battery (1)
- Baumusterzulassung (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Bemessung (1)
- Bewehrung (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Bildschirm (1)
- Brake (1)
- Braking (1)
- Bremsung (1)
- Brennstoffzelle (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Brustkorb (1)
- Bus (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Car (1)
- Cause (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crash helmet (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Damping (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Database (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Deceleration (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Demand (1)
- Design (overall design) (1)
- Deutschland ; Konferenz (1)
- Development (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Disabled person (1)
- Dynamic penetration test (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- Dämpfung (1)
- EU directive (1)
- EU-Richtlinie (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Electric vehicle (1)
- Elektrofahrzeug (1)
- Empfindlichkeit (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Ergonomics (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrzeugdach (1)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (1)
- Fahrzeugsitz (1)
- Failure (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Fire (1)
- Force (1)
- Forecast (1)
- Front (1)
- Fuel cell (1)
- Fussgänger (1)
- Geschwindigkeit (1)
- Gewicht (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Headlamp (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Human body (1)
- Hybrid vehicle (1)
- Hybridfahrzeug (1)
- Installation (1)
- International (1)
- Interview (1)
- Kamera (1)
- Knee (human) (1)
- Knie (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kraft (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (Allg.) (1)
- Leuchtdichte (1)
- Limit (1)
- Luminance (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Matrix (1)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (1)
- Menschlicher Körper (1)
- Method (1)
- Montage (1)
- Nachfrage (1)
- Nacht (1)
- Night (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Overturning (veh) (1)
- PKW (1)
- Perception (1)
- Pkw (1)
- Policy (1)
- Politik (1)
- Prognose (1)
- Prototyp (1)
- Prototype (1)
- Radfahrer (1)
- Rammsondierung (1)
- Rear view mirror (1)
- Reinforcement (in mater) (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Risiko (1)
- Risk (1)
- Road user (1)
- Roof (veh) (1)
- Rückspiegel (1)
- Safety belt (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Safety glass (1)
- Scheinwerfer (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schutzhelm (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Seat (veh) (1)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (1)
- Sensitivity (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Sicherheitsglas (1)
- Sicherheitsgurt (1)
- Side impact (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Speed (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Statistics (1)
- Statistik (1)
- Stochastic process (1)
- Stochastischer Prozess (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (1)
- Thorax (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Train (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- USA (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Unterfahrschutz (1)
- Ursache (1)
- Usa (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Verfahren (1)
- Verhütung (1)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (1)
- Verzögerung (1)
- Veränderung (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Visual display (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Wahrnehmung (1)
- Weight (1)
- Windschutzscheibe (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Überschlagen (1)
Institut
Since integrated safety systems combine active and passive safety elements in one safety system, it is necessary to define new procedures to evaluate vehicle safety from the overall system point of view. The main goal of the ASSESS project is to develop harmonized and standardized assessment procedures for collision mitigation and avoidance systems. Methods and Data Sources: In ASSESS, procedures are developed for: driver behaviour evaluation, pre-crash system performance evaluation, crash performance evaluation, socio-economic assessment. This paper will concentrate on the activities related to the crash evaluation. The objective is to perform simulations, sled tests and crash tests in order tounderstand the influence of the activation of the pre-crash systems on the occupants" injuries during the crash phase. When a traffic accident is unavoidable, pre-crash systems work on various safety devices in order to improve the vehicle occupants" protection. Braking assistance and adaptive restraint systems are the main pre-crash systems whose effect on the occupants" protection will be described in this paper. Results: The results will be a description of the effect of the activation of the pre-crash systems on the crash phase. Additionally, a set of recommendations for future methodology developments will be delivered. Furthermore, a first approach to the study of the effect of the pre-crash systems activation on the occupants" protection when the impact is unavoidable will be presented. This effect will be quantified using the biomechanical values obtained from the simulation and testing activities and their related injury risks. Simulation and testing activities will consider the following scenarios: - No activation of any pre-crash system, - Activation of one or a combination of several pre-crash systems. In this way, differences in the results obtained from different scenarios will show the effect of each pre-crash system separately during the crash phase. Discussion and Limitations: The set of activities developed in this research project is limited by the fact that with the given resources only a limited number of vehicle models could be investigated. In addition, there are also limitations related to the injury risk curves and the passive safety tools currently on the market. Conclusion and Relevance to session submitted: The paper will present a complete analysis of the effect of pre-crash systems during the crash phase when the impact is unavoidable. Details, limitations and first application experience based on a few examples will be discussed. Currently, there is not any regulation, assessment program, or other similar official procedure able to assess pre-crash systems during the crash phase. This project comprises phases of traffic accidents which have been historically analysed separately, and aims to evaluate them taking into account their interrelationship. ASSESS is one of the first European projects which deals in depth with the concept of integrated safety, defining methodologies to analyse vehicle safety from a global point of view.
A biofidelic flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been developed from the year 2000 onwards and evaluated by a technical evaluation group (Flex-TEG) of UN-ECE GRSP. A recently established UN-ECE GRSP Informal Group on GTR9 Phase 2 is aiming at introducing the FlexPLI within world-wide regulations on pedestrian safety (Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 as well as the new UN regulation 127 on pedestrian safety) as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents. Besides, the FlexPLI has already been introduced within JNCAP and is on the Euro NCAP roadmap for 2014. Despite of the biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia sections, several open issues related to the FlexPLI, like the estimation of the cost benefit, the feasibility of vehicle compliance with the threshold values, the robustness of the impactor and of the test results, the comparability between prototype and production level and the finalization of certification corridors still needed to be solved. Furthermore, discussions with stakeholders about a harmonized lower legform to bumper test area are still going on. This paper describes several studies carried out by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) regarding the benefit due to the introduction of the FlexPLI within legislation for type approval, the robustness of test results, the establishment of new assembly certification corridors and a proposal for a harmonized legform to bumper test area. Furthermore, a report on vehicle tests that previously had been carried out with three prototype legforms and were now being repeated using legforms with serial production status, is given. Finally, the paper gives a status report on the ongoing simulation and testing activities with respect to the development and evaluation of an improved test procedure with upper body mass for assessing pedestrian femur injuries.
Recent accident statistics from the German national database state bicyclists being the second endangered group of vulnerable road users besides pedestrians. With 399 fatalities, more than 14.000 seriously injured and more than 61.000 slightly injured persons on german roads in the year 2011, the group of bicyclists is ranked second of all road user groups (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2012). While the overall bicycle helmet usage frequency in Germany is very low, evidence is given that its usage leads to a significant reduction of severe head injuries. After an estimation of the benefit of bicycle helmet usage as well as an appropriate test procedure for bicyclists, this paper describes two different approaches for the improvement of bicyclist safety. While the first one is focusing on the assessment of the vehicle based protection potential for bicyclists, the second one is concentrating on the safety assessment of bicycle helmets. Within the first part of the study the possible revision of the existing pedestrian testing protocols is being examined, using in depth accident data, full scale simulation and hardware testing. Within the second part of the study, the results of tests according to supplemental test procedures for the safety assessment of bicycle helmets developed by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) are presented. An additional full scale test performed at reduced impact speed proves that measures of active vehicle safety as e.g. braking before the collision event do not necessarily always lead to a reduction of injury severity.
Within this paper different European accident data sources were used to investigate the causations and backgrounds of road traffic accidents with pedestrians. Analyses of high level national data and in-depth accident data from Germany and Great Britain was used to confirm and refine preliminary accident scenarios identified from other sources using a literature review. General observations made included that a high proportion of killed or seriously injured pedestrian casualties impacted by cars were in "dark" light conditions. Seven accident scenarios were identified (each divided into "daylight" and "dark" light conditions) which included the majority of the car front-to-pedestrian crash configurations. Test scenarios were developed using the identified accident scenarios and relevant parameters. Hypothetical parameters were derived to describe the performance of pedestrian pre-crash systems based on the assumption that these systems are designed to avoid false positives as a very high priority, i.e. at virtually all costs. As result, three "Base Test Scenarios" were selected to be developed in detail in the AsPeCSS project. However, further Enhanced Test Scenarios may be needed to address environmental factors such as darkness if it is determined that system performance is sensitive to these factors. Finally, weighting factors for the accident scenarios for Europe (EU-27) were developed by averaging and extrapolation of the available data. This paper represents interim results of Work Package 1 within the AsPeCSS project.
In Germany the number of casualties in passenger car to pedestrian crashes has been reduced by a considerable amount of 40% as regards fatalities and 25% with regard to seriously injured pedestrians since the year 2001. Similar trends can be seen in other European countries. The reasons for that positive development are still under investigation. As infrastructural or behavioral changes do in general take a longer time to be effective in real world, explanations related to improved active and passive safety of passenger vehicles can be more relevant in providing answers for this trend. The effect of passive pedestrian protection " specified by the Euro NCAP pedestrian test result " is of particular interest and has already been analyzed by several authors. However, the number of vehicles with some valid Euro NCAP pedestrian score (post 2002 rating) was quite limited in most of those studies. To overcome this problem of small datasets German National Accident Records have been taken to investigate a similar objective but now based on a much bigger dataset. The paper uses German National Accident Records from the years 2009 to 2011. In total 65.140 records of pedestrian to passenger car crashes have been available. Considering crash parameters like accident location (rural / urban areas) etc., 27.143 of those crashes have been classified to be relevant for the analysis of passive pedestrian safety. In those 27.143 records 7.576 Euro NCAP rated vehicles (post 2002 rating) have been identified. In addition it was possible to identify vehicles which comply with pedestrian protection legislation (2003/102/EG) where phase 1 came into force in October 2005. A significant correlation between Euro NCAP pedestrian score and injury outcome in real-life car to pedestrian crashes was found. Comparing a vehicle scoring 5 points and a vehicle scoring 22 points, pedestrians" conditional probability of getting fatally injured is reduced by 35% (from 0.58% to 0.37%) for the later one. At the same time the probability of serious injuries can be reduced by 16% (from 27.4% to 22.9%). No significant injury reducing effect, associated with the introduction of pedestrian protection legislation (phase 1) was detected. Considerable effects have also been identified comparing diesel and gasoline cars. Higher engine displacements are associated with a lower injury risk for pedestrians. The most relevant parameter has been "time of accident", whereas pedestrians face a more than 2 times higher probability to be fatally injured during night and darkness as compared to daytime conditions.
Thoracic injuries are one of the main causes of fatally and severely injured casualties in car crashes. Advances in restraint system technology and airbags may be needed to address this problem; however, the crash test dummies available today for studying these injuries have limitations that prevent them from being able to demonstrate the benefits of such innovations. THORAX-FP7 was a collaborative medium scale project under the European Seventh Framework. It focused on the mitigation and prevention of thoracic injuries through an improved understanding of the thoracic injury mechanisms and the implementation of this understanding in an updated design for the thorax-shoulder complex of the THOR dummy. The updated dummy should enable the design and evaluation of advanced restraint systems for a wide variety (gender, age and size) of car occupants. The hardware development involved five steps: 1) Identification of the dominant thoracic injury types from field data, 2) Specification of biomechanical requirements, 3) Identification of injury parameters and necessary instrumentation, 4) Dummy hardware development and 5) Evaluation of the demonstrator dummy. The activities resulted in the definition of new biofidelity and instrumentation requirements for an updated thorax-shoulder complex. Prototype versions were realised and implemented in three THOR dummies for biomechanical evaluation testing. This paper documents the hardware developments and biomechanical evaluation testing carried out.
It is well known that most accidents with pedestrians are caused by the driver not being alert or misinterpreting the situation. For that reason advanced forward looking safety systems have a high potential to improve safety for this group of vulnerable road users. Active pedestrian protection systems combine reduction of impact speed by driver warning and/or autonomous braking with deployment of protective devices shortly before the imminent impact. According to the Euro NCAP roadmap the Autonomous Emergency Braking system tests for Pedestrians Protection will be set in force from 2016 onwards. Various projects and organisations in Europe are developing performance tests and assessment procedures as accompanying measures to the Euro NCAP initiative. To provide synthesised input to Euro NCAP so-called Harmonisation Platforms (HP-) have been established. Their main goal is to foster exchange of information on key subjects, thereby generating a clear overview of similarities and differences on the approaches chosen and, on that basis, recommend on future test procedures. In this paper activities of the Harmonisation Platform 2 on the development of Test Equipment are presented. For the testing targets that mimic humans different sensing technologies are required. A first set of specifications for pedestrian targets and the propulsion systems as collected by Harmonisation Platform 2 are presented together with a first evaluation for a number of available tools.
For a number of EU regulatory acts Virtual Testing (VT) is already allowed for type approval (see Commission Regulation No. 371/2010 of 16 April 2010 amending the Framework Directive 2007/46/EC). However, only a very general procedure on how to apply VT for type approval is provided. Technical details for specific regulatory acts are not given yet. The main objective of the European project IMVITER (IMplementation of VIrtual TEsting in Safety Regulations) was to promote the implementation of VT in safety regulations. When proposing VT procedures the new regulation was taken into account, in particular, addressing open issues. Special attention was paid to pedestrian protection as pilot cases. A key aspect for VT implementation is to demonstrate that the employed simulation models are reliable. This paper describes how the Verification and Validation (V&V) method defined by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers was adapted for pedestrian protection VT based assessment. or the certification of headform impactors an extensive study was performed at two laboratories to assess the variability in calibration tests and equivalent results from a set of simulation models. Based on these results a methodology is defined for certification of headform impactor simulation models. A similar study was also performed with one vehicle in the type approval test setup. Its bonnet was highly instrumented and subjected to 45 impacts in five different positions at two laboratories in order to obtain an estimation of the variability in the physical tests. An equivalent study was performed using stochastic simulation with a metamodel fed with observed variability in impact conditions of physical headforms. An estimation of the test method uncertainty was obtained and used in the definition of a validation corridor for simulation models. Validation metric and criteria were defined in cooperation with the ISO TC22 SC10 and SC12 WG4 "Virtual Testing". A complete validation procedure including different test setups, physical magnitudes and evaluation criteria is provided. A detailed procedural flowchart is developed for VT implementation in EC Regulation No 78/2009 based on a so called "Hybrid VT" approach, which combines real hardware based head impact tests and simulations. This detailed flowchart is shown and explained within this paper. Another important point within the virtual testing based procedures is the documentation of relevant information resulting from the verification and validation process of the numerical models used. For this purpose report templates were developed within the project. The proposed procedure fixes minimum V&V requirements for numerical models to be confidently used within the type-approval process. It is not intended to be a thorough guide on how to build such reliable models. Different modeling methodologies are therefore possible, according to particular OEM know-how. These requirements respond to a balance amongst the type-approval stakeholders interests. A cost-benefit analysis, which was also performed within the IMVITER project, supports this approach, showing the conditions in which VT implementation is beneficial. Based on the experience gained in the project and the background of the experts involved an outlook is given as a roadmap of VT implementation, identifying the most important milestones to be reached along the way to a future vehicle type approval procedure supported by VT. The results presented in this paper show an important step addressing open questions and fostering the future acceptance of virtual testing in pedestrian protection type approval procedures.
Aktive Systeme der passiven Fahrzeugsicherheit zum Fußgängerschutz, sogenannte crash-aktive Fußgängerschutzsysteme, werden seit 2005 zur Erfüllung der gesetzlichen Anforderungen (siehe Verordnung (EG) Nr. 78/2009 und 631/2009) in Serienfahrzeugen eingesetzt. Diese crash-aktiven Fußgängerschutzsysteme stellen im Gegensatz zu den rein passiven Systemen nur eine instationäre Lösung dar. Da die innerhalb der gesetzlichen Anforderungen definierten Testverfahren zur Bewertung stationärer Systeme entwickelt wurden, können derzeit mögliche Risiken instationärer Systeme nicht berücksichtigt werden. Im Rahmen dieses Forschungsprojektes soll ein Bewertungsverfahren für diese crash-aktiven Fußgängerschutzsysteme entwickelt werden, welches das reale Potential dieser Systeme möglichst gut wiedergibt. Basis hierfür soll eine umfangreiche Untersuchung zusätzlicher Risiken bilden. Die hier untersuchten instationären Schutzmaßnahmen werden nur im Falle eines Fahrzeuganpralls gegen Fußgänger aktiviert, der daher zuverlässig erkannt werden muss. Für die hierfür eingesetzten, kontaktbasierten Sensorsysteme stellen Fußgänger mit geringen Lasteinträgen in die Fahrzeugfront eine große Herausforderung dar. Die Lasteinträge hängen von zahlreichen Faktoren, wie bspw. der Höhe der entsprechenden Krafteinleitungspfade sowie der Größe und dem Gewichts des Fußgängers, ab. Mit Hilfe von umfangreichen Anprallversuchen und -simulationen wird gezeigt, dass die bisher eingesetzten Prüfkörper nur zum Teil für die Erfüllung dieser Anforderungen geeignet sind. Für ein geeignetes Prüfverfahren müssen daher neue Prüfkörper entwickelt werden. Durch die Aktivierung der Schutzmaßnahme soll bei den crash-aktiven Systemen vor allem das Verletzungsrisiko beim Kopfanprall verringert werden. Hierfür wird häufig die hintere Motorhaubenkante angehoben, um zusätzlichen Deformationsfreiraum zur Verfügung zu stellen. Die Haubenanhebung kann jedoch auch in zusätzlichen Verletzungsrisiken resultieren, bspw. durch die exponierte hintere Haubenkante oder die Verringerung des Deformationsfreiraums in Folge des Oberkörperanpralls. Ein Ersatzprüfverfahren zur Bewertung der Haubendeformation mit Hilfe des Hüftimpaktors wird vorgestellt. Ein hybrides Testverfahren bestehend aus Simulation und Versuch eignet sich für eine objektive Bewertung dieser Systeme, wobei die entsprechenden Versuchsparameter mit Hilfe der vorherigen Simulation bestimmt werden können.
Um die zukünftige Entwicklung von Fahrzeugen mit alternativem Antrieb in Deutschland verfolgen, analysieren und mögliche negative Auswirkungen auf die Verkehrssicherheit zeitnah identifizieren zu können, hat die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) im Jahr 2010 die Einrichtung einer langfristigen Beobachtung des Fahrzeugmarktes und des Unfallgeschehens von Pkw mit alternativen Antriebsarten initiiert. Die Daten des vorliegenden Berichtes dokumentieren die Marktdurchdringung von Personenkraftwagen mit alternativen Antriebsarten und informieren über die Unfallbeteiligung von Fahrzeugen mit alternativem Antrieb bis 2011. Es hat sich gezeigt, dass Fahrzeuge mit Hybridantrieb nach wie vor ein starkes Marktwachstum aufweisen. Die Zuwachsrate ist nahezu auf dem gleichen hohen Niveau wie in den Vorjahren (ca. 28%, getypter Bestand). Bei den reinen Elektrofahrzeugen ist die Anzahl getypter Fahrzeuge sehr stark angestiegen, von 212 im Jahr 2010 auf 1880 im Jahr 2011. Der reale Bestand an Elektrofahrzeugen (inklusive ungetypter Fahrzeuge) hat sich demgegenüber von 2010 auf 2011 auf 4.541 Pkw verdoppelt. Dies deutet auf eine zunehmende Serienreife von Elektro-Kfz hin. Pkw mit alternativem Antrieb weisen 2011 (bis auf Gas) einen höheren Anteil an Unfällen innerorts auf als Pkw mit herkömmlichem Antrieb. Hybrid Fahrzeuge haben dabei eine erhöhte Beteiligungsquote innerorts von ca. 76%. Der relativ hohe Anteil von Innerortsunfällen von alternativ betriebenen Fahrzeugen ist vor allem vor dem Hintergrund der Nutzung der Fahrzeuge zu interpretieren.