84 Personenschäden
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (79)
- Buch (Monographie) (13)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (92) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (75)
- Konferenz (75)
- Injury (61)
- Verletzung (61)
- Deutschland (57)
- Germany (56)
- Accident (35)
- Unfall (35)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (30)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (24)
Institut
- Sonstige (92) (entfernen)
To elucidate the risk of pedestrians, bicycle and motorbike users, data of two accident research units from 1999 to 2014 were analysed in regard to demographic data, collision details, preclinical and clinical data using SPSS. 14.295 injured vulnerable road users were included. 92 out of 3610 pedestrians ("P", 2.5%), 90 out of 8307 bicyclists ("B", 1.1%) and 115 out of 4094 motorcycle users ("M", 2.8%) were diagnosed with spinal fractures. Thoracic fractures were most frequent ahead of lumbar and cervical fractures. Car collisions were most frequent mechanism (68, 62 and 36%). MAIS was 3.8, 2.8 and 3.2 for P, B and A with ISS 32, 16 and 23. AIS-head was 2.2, 1.3 and 1.5). Vulnerable road users are at significant risk for spine fractures. These are often associated with severe additional injuries, e.g. the head and a very high overall trauma severity (polytrauma).
Introduction: Spine injuries pose a considerable risk to life and quality of life. The total number of road deaths in developed countries has markedly decreased, e.g. in Germany from over 20000 in 1970 to less than 4000 in 2010, but little is known how this is reflected in the burden of spine fractures of motor vehicle users. In this study, we aimed to show the actual incidence of spine injuries among drivers and front passengers and elucidate possible dependencies between crash mechanisms and types of injuries.
This study aims to analyze spine injuries in motor vehicle accidents. Between 1985 and 2004 the Hannover accident research unit documented 18353 accidents. We identified 161 front passengers (0.53%) with cervical spine injuries, 84 (0.28%) with thoracic and 95 (0.31%) with lumbar injuries. Technical and medical data was reviewed. Patients" records were retrieved. X-rays were evaluated and fractures were classified according to the Magerl classification. 68% and 57% of thoracic and lumbar fractures occurred in accidents with multiple impacts. Delta-v was 50, 40 and 40 kph in passengers with cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine, resp. Passengers with spinal fractures frequently showed numerous concomitant injuries, e.g. additional vertebral fractures. The influence of seat belts and airbags is discussed. Patient work-up has to include a thorough investigation for additional injuries.
With an ever rising human life expectancy the share of elderly people in society is constantly rising. This leads to the fact that at the same rate the share of people with age related diseases such as dementia and poor eyesight taking part in traffic will rise and therefore traffic accidents caused by this group of people due to the disease will play an ever greater role. This Situation will be among the future challenges of road safety work. At present this study displays specific characteristics of accidents caused by elderly car drivers (aged 65 or higher) based on the analysis of the German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS. Herein almost 1000 elderly car drivers were identified as accident participants in the years 2008 to 2011. The focus of this study lies on identifying special types of accidents which are caused by elderly drivers and on characterizing these types with the information gathered on scene and by interviewing the participants. The main evidence analyzed is the knowledge about the accident locality, the trajectories of the participants as well as the reasons for the occurrence of the accidents. Furthermore personal information such as the personal condition before the accident and driving purposes is used to identify patterns of contributing circumstances for accidents caused by elderly traffic participants.
The so-called "seat-belt injuries" or "seat-belt syndromes", described as 2-point seat-belt injuries, contain heavy inflection injuries of the lumbal spinal column, combined with heavy abdominal injuries as rupture of the upper intestinal bold or heavy injuries of the upper entrails. With "playing" children in the font of the car, with inappropriate plant of 3-point belts, identical injuries can occur.
In Germany averagely two million traffic accidents happen each year and emergency medical services are called to more than 400 000 patients. Even though this number is decreasing continuously (due to improvements in the fields of vehicle safety, road construction, and accident prevention) every case is yet a challenge for the rescuers and requires improvements in emergency medicine as well. Especially during diagnostics right at the accident scene, there are only limited instruments available to gain the necessary knowledge of the injuries suffered, to come to essential decisions about treatment or transport. To provide an additional diagnostic aid by scouting and estimating the situation, a software-tool calculating the likeliness of the most frequent severe injuries (AIS 3-6) of front occupants in passenger cars has been developed to deliver this necessary information about particular accident scenarios. To achieve this, logistic likelihood functions have been calculated in a multivariate regression analysis analysing all AIS 3+ injuries in the GIDAS database of the years 1999-2006 that happened more than four times
In most of developed countries, the progress made in passive safety during the last three decades allowed to drastically reduce the number of killed and severely injured especially for occupants of passenger cars. This reduction is mainly observed for frontal impacts for which the AIS3+ injuries has been reduced about 52% for drivers and 38% for front passengers. The stiffening of the cars' structure coupled with the generalization of airbags and the improvement of the seatbelt restraint (load limiter, pretension, etc.) allowed to protect vital body regions such as head, neck and thorax. However, the abdomen did not take advantage with so much success of this progress. The objective of this study is to draw up an inventory on the abdominal injuries of the belted car occupants involved in frontal impact, to present adapted counter-measures and to assess their potential effectiveness. In the first part the stakes corresponding to the abdominal injuries will be defined according to types of impact, seat location, occupants' age and type of injured organs. Then, we shall focus on the abdominal injury risk curves for adults involved in frontal impact and on the comparisons of the average risks according to the seat location. In the second part we will list counter-measures and we shall calculate their effectiveness. The method of case control will be used in order to estimate odds ratio, comparing two samples, given by occupants having or not having the studied safety system. For this study, two type of data sources are used: national road injured accident census and retrospective in-depth accident data collection. Abdominal injuries are mainly observed in frontal impact (52%). Fatal or severe abdominal occupant- injuries are observed at least in 27% of cases, ranking this body region as the most injured just after the thorax (51%). In spite of a twice lower occupation rate in the back seats compared to the front seats, the number of persons sustaining abdominal injuries at the rear place is higher than in the front place. In recent cars, the risk of having a serious or fatal abdominal injury in a frontal impact is 1.6% for the driver, 3.6% for the front passenger and 6.3% for the rear occupants. The most frequently hurt organs are the small intestine (17%), the spleen (16%) and the liver (13%). The most common countermeasures have a good efficiency in the reduction of the abdominal injuries for the adults: the stiffness of the structure of the seats allows decreasing the abdominal injury risk from 54% (driver) to 60% (front occupant), the seatbelt pretensioners decrease also this risk from 90% (driver) to 83% (front passenger).
Im Rahmen der Optimierung des Sicherheitssystems Reisebusverkehr beauftragte die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) das Institut für Fahrzeugtechnik an der Fachhochschule Trier eine Schwachstellenanalyse zur Optimierung des Notausstiegssystems bei Reisebussen durchzuführen. Die Bearbeitung des Projektes geschah in den folgenden Einzelschritten: Die entsprechenden Paragraphen des nationalen und europäischen Regelwerkes wurden in Anlage V systematisch zusammengestellt und verglichen. Ergänzend wurden die teilweise erheblich abweichenden Regelungen in den USA, Japan und Australien betrachtet. Eine erste Schwachstellenanalyse aus Hersteller- bzw. Konstrukteurssicht wurde erstellt. Darauf folgten Expertengespräche in der Fahrzeug- und Zulieferindustrie sowie international tätigen Prüforganisationen. Hier wurden die bestehenden bzw. sich in der Entwicklung befindlichen konstruktiven Lösungen von Rohbau, Umbau und Innenausstattung von Reisebussen ermittelt und systematisiert. Eine zweite Schwachstellenanalyse beinhaltete die Sicht des Gebrauchs und Missbrauchs sowie des Notfalls und der Rettung. Als Ausgangslage dienten Einsatzberichte und Befragungen von Feuerwehr und Technischem Hilfswerk (THW) sowie Unfallgutachten. Als nächster Schritt wurden Evakuierungsversuche am Reisebus in Seitenlage durchgeführt. Sie dienten dazu, die bisher gewonnenen Erkenntnisse näher zu untersuchen, zu ergänzen und zu belegen sowie neue Erkenntnisse zu gewinnen. Die Evakuierungsversuche wurden durch CAD-Simulationen erweitert. In einem Workshop mit Experten aller betroffenen Bereiche wurden die erarbeiteten Schwachstellen und Lösungsmöglichkeiten diskutiert, systematisiert und hinsichtlich ihrer Relevanz bewertet. Die gewonnenen Erkenntnisse wurden zu einem "Lastenheft für ein optimiertes Notausstiegssystem bei Reisebussen" zusammengefasst. Die nach der Bearbeitung der oben genannten Arbeitspunkte noch offenen Fragen wurden als Forschungsbedarf formuliert. Der Originalberichte enthält als Anlagen einen Auszug aus den Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS 217, USA) (I), die Fragenkataloge für Bushersteller (II), Busunternehmen (III) und Feuerwehren (IV), eine Zusammenfassung der europäischen Regelungen (V), den Fragebogen Gruppenversuche (VI) sowie die Teilnehmerliste des Expertengespräches (VII). Auf die Wiedergabe dieser Anlagen wurde in dieser Veröffentlichung verzichtet. Sie liegen bei der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen vor und sind dort einsehbar. Verweise auf die Anlagen im Berichtstext wurden beibehalten.
While cyclists and pedestrians are known to be at significant risk for severe injuries when exposed to road traffic accidents (RTAs) involving trucks, little is known about RTA injury risk for truck drivers. The objective of this study is to analyze the injury severity in truck drivers following RTAs. Between 1999 and 2008 the Hannover Medical School Accident Research Unit prospectively documented 43,000 RTAs involving 582 trucks. Injury severity including the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the maximum abbreviated injury scale (MAIS) were analyzed. Technical parameters (e.g. delta-v, direction of impact), the location of accident, and its dependency on the road type were also taken into consideration. The results show that the safety of truck drivers is assured by their vehicles, the consequence being that the risk of becoming injured is likely to be low. However, the legs especially are at high risk for severe injuries during RTAs. This probability increases in the instance of a collision with another truck. Nevertheless, in RTAs involving trucks and regular passenger vehicles, the other party is in higher risk of injury.
Das Projekt Deutsche Datenbank Rettungsdienst beinhaltet die Entwicklung und Erprobung eines bundeseinheitlichen Referenzdatensatzes für den Rettungsdienst, dessen Basis die medizinisch logistische Verlaufsdokumentation rettungsdienstlicher Einsätze mittels DIVI-Protokollen bzw. alternativer Dokumentationsprotokolle darstellt. Im Anschluss an die Entwicklung eines Referenzdatensatzes für den Rettungsdienst wurden insgesamt 9.689 Einsatzprotokolle im Rahmen einer repräsentativen bundesweiten Stichprobe erfasst. Diese wurden hinsichtlich logistischer wie auch medizinischer Parameter ausgewertet. Führende Diagnosen im Einsatzspektrum waren akute Erkrankungen, insbesondere des Herzkreislaufsystems, des Zentralnervensystems und der Atmungsorgane. Unter den dokumentierten Verletzungen hatten Schädel-Traumata (ohne Berücksichtigung des Schweregrads) und Extremitätenverletzungen den größten Anteil. Analysen der Versorgungsqualität gemäß nationaler Leitlinien zeigten bei der notärztlichen Versorgung von Patienten mit akutem Koronarsyndrom überwiegend gute, bei der Versorgung vom schwer Schädel-Hirn-Verletzten unzureichende Befolgung der Therapie-Empfehlungen. Bei nicht-notärztlich versorgten Patienten werden in nennenswertem Umfang die Gabe von Infusionen und Medikamenten ohne Beteiligung eines Notarztes dokumentiert. Im Rahmen der Datenauswertung traten verschiedene Defizite hinsichtlich der Dokumentation rettungsdienstlicher Einsätze in Deutschland zu Tage, die sich überwiegend durch das Problem fehlender Angaben kennzeichnen ließen. Die Dokumentation von Rettungseinsätzen stellt demnach keineswegs eine Idealsituation dar, wie es die aktuelle Datenlage zeigt. Die Ergebnisse untermauern die Notwendigkeit eines bundeseinheitlichen Einsatzprotokolls zur Erfassung von Notfalleinsätzen mit und ohne Notarztbeteiligung, bei dem die Erkenntnisse aus diesem Forschungsprojekt eingebunden werden.