Der vorliegende Bericht befasst sich mit den Auswirkungen von teilasphärischen Außenspiegeln von Kraftfahrzeugen auf das Unfallgeschehen. Es wird untersucht, ob die Vorteile teilasphärischer Spiegel (größeres Sichtfeld, Reduzierung des "toten Winkels") mit Nachteilen durch die optisch bedingten Verzerrungen des Spiegels verbunden sind (zum Beispiel fehlerhafte Distanz- oder Geschwindigkeitsschätzungen). Hierzu wird ein mehrstufiges Vorgehen gewählt, dass aus der Bestimmung des derzeitigen Ausrüstungsstands, einer Zusammenstellung und vergleichenden Betrachtung nationaler und internationaler Richtlinien und einer umfangreichen Literaturrecherche zur bisherigen Spiegelforschung besteht. Auf der Grundlage dieser Informationen wird der aktuelle Wissensstand zur seitlichen und rückwärtigen Sicht aus Kraftfahrzeugen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der verschiedenen Arten von Außenspiegeln (plan, sphärisch konvex und teilasphärisch) ermittelt und systematisiert. Ergänzend wird im Rahmen von Unfallanalysen untersucht, ob die Verwendung neuartiger Spiegelsysteme einen messbaren Einfluss auf die Unfallstatistik hat. Besondere Relevanz haben in diesem Zusammenhang Unfälle bei AbbiegevorgÃ-¤ngen und Fahrspurwechseln, also Unfalltypen, bei denen der so genannte "tote Winkel" eine maßgebliche Rolle spielen könnte. Zusätzlich wird die Verwendung unterschiedlicher Spiegelsysteme und der Stand der Technik in der derzeitigen Fahrzeugpopulation ermittelt und eine Prognose für die weitere Entwicklung erarbeitet. Diese Erhebungen dienen als Basis für die Durchführung von drei Experimenten, die Informationen zum Einfluss teilasphärischer Spiegel auf die Wahrnehmung liefern sollen. Experiment 1 beschäftigt sich mit Distanzschätzungen durch plane, sphärische und teilasphärische Spiegel. Experiment 2 untersucht die Fähigkeit von Versuchspersonen, mit Hilfe eines planen, sphärischen oder teilasphärischen Außenspiegels die Distanz- und Geschwindigkeit eines sich nähernden Fahrzeugs einzuschätzen und so den Kollisionszeitpunkt zu bestimmen. Während die ersten beiden Experimente eher Nachteile teilasphärischer Spiegel zu entdecken versuchen, widmet sich Experiment 3 explizit der Frage nach den Vorteilen dieser Spiegel. Es wird daher untersucht, ob das größere Sichtfeld trotz optischer Verzerrungen genutzt werden kann und sich somit Fehleinschätzungen bei der Objekterkennung im "toten Winkel" signifikant reduzieren lassen. Die Experimente können keine Belege für sicherheitsrelevante Nachteile teilasphÃ-¤rischer Außenspiegel finden, sie zeigen jedoch, dass ein größeres, rückwärtiges Sichtfeld genutzt werden kann. Die EinfÃ-¼hrung teilasphärischer Außenspiegel wird daher befürwortet und es wird erwartet, dass diese positive Auswirkungen auf das Unfallgeschehen haben werden.
This study is aimed to investigate the correlations of impact conditions and dynamic responses with the injuries and injury severity of child pedestrians by accident reconstruction. For this purpose, the pedestrian accident cases were selected from Sweden and Germany with detailed information about injuries, accident cars, and accident environment. The selected accident cases were reconstructed using mathematical models of pedestrian and passenger car. The pedestrian models were generated based on the height, weight, and age of the pedestrian involved in accidents. The car models were built up based on the corresponding accident car. The impact speeds in simulations were defined based on the reported data. The calculated physical quantities were analyzed to find the correlation with injury outcomes registered in the accident database. The reconstruction approaches are discussed in terms of data collection, estimating vehicle impact speeds, pedestrian moving speeds and initial posture, secondary ground impact, validity of the mathematical models, as well as impact biomechanics.
Pedestrian and cyclist are the most vulnerable road users in traffic crashes. One important aspect of this study was the comparable analysis of the exact impact configuration and the resulting injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists in view of epidemiology. The secondary aim was assessment of head injury risks and kinematics of adult pedestrian and cyclists in primary and secondary impacts and to correlate the injuries related to physical parameters like HIC value, 3ms linear acceleration, and discuss the technical parameter with injuries observed in real-world accidents based documented real accidents of GIDAS and explains the head injuries by simulated load and impact conditions based on PC-Crash and MADYMO. A subsample of n=402 pedestrians and n=940 bicyclists from GIDAS database, Germany was used for preselection, from which 22 pedestrian and 18 cyclist accidents were selected for reconstruction by initially using PC-Crash to calculate impact conditions, such as vehicle impact velocity, vehicle kinematic sequence and throw out distance. The impact conditions then were employed to identify the initial conditions in simulation of MADYMO reconstruction. The results show that cyclists always suffer lower injury outcomes for the same accident severity. Differences in HIC, head relative impact velocity, 3ms linear contiguous acceleration, maximum angular velocity and acceleration, contact force, throwing distance and head contact timing are shown. The differences of landing conditions in secondary impacts of pedestrians and cyclists are also identified. Injury risk curves were generated by logistic regression model for each predicting physical parameters.
Since a number of human models have been developed it appears sensible to use these models also in the accident analysis. Especially the understanding of injury mechanisms and probably even injury risk curves can be significantly improved when interesting accidents are reconstructed using human body models. However, an important limitation for utilising human models for accident reconstruction is the effort needed to develop detailed FE models of the accident partners or to prepare the human model reconstruction by running physical accident reconstructions. The proposed approach for using human models for accident reconstruction is to use simplified and parametric car models. These models can be adapted to the crash opponents in a fast and cost effective way. Although, accuracy is less compared to detailed FE models, the relevant change in velocity can be simulated well, indicating that the computation of a detailed crash pulse is not needed. Two frontal impact test accidents that were reconstructed experimentally and using the parametric car models are indicating sufficient correlation of the adapted parametric car models with the full scale crash reconstructions. However, further developments of the parametric models to be capable for the use in lateral impacts and rear impacts are needed. For the PC Crash simulation runs the output sampling rate is too large to allow sufficient analysis. In addition the performance appears to be too general.
This study aimed at prediction of long bone fractures and assessment of lower extremity injury mechanisms in real world passenger car to pedestrian collision. For this purpose, two pedestrian accident cases with detail recorded lower limb injuries were reconstructed via combining MBS (Multi-body system) and FE (Finite element) methods. The code of PC Crash was used to determine the boundary conditions before collision, and then MBS models were used to reproduce the pedestrian kinematics and injuries during crash. Furthermore, a validated lower limb FE model was chosen to conduct reconstruction of injuries and prediction of long bone fracture via physical parameters of von Mises stress and bending moment. The injury outcomes from simulations were compared with hospital recorded injury data and the same long bone fracture patterns and positions can be observed. Moreover, the calculated long bone fracture tolerance corresponded to the outcome from cadaver tests. The result shows that FE model is capable to reproduce the dynamic injury process and is an effective tool to predict the risk of long bone fractures.