Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (16) (entfernen)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (12)
- Sonstige (6)
- Präsident (1)
The Joint Transport Research Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the International Transport Forum recently conducted a benchmarking study of the safety and productivity of typical highway transport trucks from various countries. This paper focuses on vehicle productivity and efficiency in regard to the movement of freight. Forty vehicles from 10 countries were examined. The vehicles were designed for longer-haul applications and were classified in three separate categories: workhorse vehicles, which are the most common and can travel on most roads; high-capacity vehicles, which may be restricted to a certain class of road; and very high-capacity vehicles, which may be restricted to specific highways or routes. The metrics used in the analysis include maximum cargo mass and volume capacity, optimum cargo density, fuel consumption, and carbon dioxide output as a function of the freight task. The study found that size and weight regulations have a significant effect on the productivity and efficiency of heavy vehicles, including fuel consumption and vehicle emissions per unit of cargo transported. Significant variations were found among the vehicles from participating countries as well as within vehicle classes. It was also apparent that, in general, higher-productivity vehicles are correlated more strongly with increased cargo volume than with increased cargo mass and that larger trucks are better suited to lower-density freight than are workhorse vehicles. The study also found that it is important to consider the freight task when evaluating vehicle fuel consumption and emissions.
Ziel des Projektes war es, bedingt durch die wachsende Anzahl der im Verkehr befindlichen elektrisch und hybrid-elektrisch betriebenen Fahrzeuge, notwendige Anpassungen der periodisch technischen Überwachung zu erarbeiten. Dazu wurden von verschiedenen Fahrzeugen die relevanten Bauteile des elektrischen Antriebsstrangs identifiziert und deren Ausfallverhalten analysiert. Um die Degradationsauswirkungen einzelner Bauteile und Funktionen auf das gesamte System bestimmen zu können, hat die FSD ein Simulationsmodell erstellt. Die daraus ermittelten Ergebnisse waren Grundlage für die Bestimmung verkehrssicherheits- und umweltkritischer Bauteile sowie deren Funktionen. Diese Modellaussagen wurden mit Realversuchen an Fahrzeugen validiert. Zusätzlich konnten in einem Feldversuch 2.560 Fahrzeuge mit elektrischem Antriebsstrang untersucht werden. Aus diesen Ergebnissen lassen sich Änderungsvorschläge für die Untersuchungen und Vorgaben ableiten. Dafür ist für einen Großteil dieser Untersuchungen die Nutzung von Diagnosedaten eine geeignete Möglichkeit. Die 47. Verordnung zur Änderung straßenverkehrsrechtlicher Vorschriften berücksichtigt bereits an vielen Stellen die neuen Antriebskonzepte. Von daher werden lediglich geringe Anpassungen in der StVZO für -§ 19 und den Beispielkatalog dazu, -§ 29, Anlage VIIIa, Anlage VIIId sowie die HU-Richtlinie vorgeschlagen. Für die Durchführung der Untersuchungspunkte zum HV-System ist die Entwicklung einer Hochvolt-Richtlinie empfehlenswert. Einige wichtige Prüfverfahren lassen sich derzeit technisch noch nicht umsetzen. Dazu sind Änderungen der internationalen Bau- und Betriebsvorschriften notwendig. Diese werden bei der EU/UNECE anzuregen sein. Es besteht über dieses Projekt hinaus weiterhin Forschungsbedarf, um sich intensiv mit diesen Fahrzeugen zu befassen und deren Weiterentwicklung zu beobachten, damit notwendige Auswirkungen auf die PTI rechtzeitig erkannt werden können.
Although the bus belongs to the safest traffic means, single accidents can be particularly severe and concern many passengers. Especially in case of fires a high number of injured and killed persons can be the outcome. Fire safety of buses therefore is of high importance. With the increase of synthetic and plastic materials as a material for the interior equipment of buses and coaches because of their ood mechanical properties combined with low weight, the question arises whether the safety level has decreased in case of a fire during the last years - also compared to other means of transport. Because of the combustible plastics and their ability to release a high amount of heat the main fire load in buses is no longer the fuel but the plastic materials which are also often easy to ignite. Besides the flammability of the equipments, the production of smoke, the smoke development and propagation and its toxicity for the people as well as the testing methods and limit values are of interest. For those reasons research projects were initiated on behalf of the German Federal Highway Research Institute. At the one hand the fire behavior of coach interiors was examined in general focusing on fire propagation as well as fire detection and signalling. As result, recommendations with regard to early fire detection systems for the engine compartments and on-board extinguishing equipment were elaborated. At the other hand research is carried out to examine heat release, smoke, smoke propagation and its toxicity due to burning bus interior materials. The paper describes which effective and economically reasonable fire safety requirements for interiors of buses would improve the current situation. Proposals for amendments of current requirements are recommended including the specification of appropriate limit values. In particular, it is taken into consideration which reasonable fire safety standards from other transport sectors, especially the rail sector, should be transferred to buses.
The GRSP informal group on child restraint systems (CRS) finalised phase 1 of a new regulation for the homologation of CRS . This regulation is the subject of several discussions concerning the safety benefits and the advantages and disadvantages that certain specific points may bring. However, these discussions are sometimes not based on scientific facts and do not consider the whole package but only single items. Based on the experience of the CASPER partners in the fields of human behaviour, accident analysis, test procedures and biomechanics in the area of child safety, a consideration of the safety benefits of phase 1 of the new regulation and recommendations for phase 2 will be given.
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe (EU27) is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car's safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EU-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car's frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation. This paper reports the cost benefit analyses performed to estimate the effect of the following potential changes to the frontal impact regulation: • Option 1 " No change and allow current measures to propagate throughout the vehicle fleet. • Option 2 " Add a full width test to the current offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) test. • Option 3 " Add a full width test and replace the current ODB test with a Progressive Deformable Barrier (PDB) test. For the analyses national data were used from Great Britain (STATS 19) and from Germany (German Federal Statistical Office). In addition in-depth real word crash data were used from CCIS (Great Britain) and GIDAS (Germany). To estimate the benefit a generalised linear model, an injury reduction model and a matched pairs modelling approach were applied. The benefits were estimated to be: for Option 1 "No change" about 2.0%; for Option 2 "FW test" ranging from 5 to 12% and for Option 3 "FW and PDB tests" 9 to 14% of car occupant killed and seriously injured casualties.
Regarding to the German road traffic licensing regulations it is mandatory to have a light system using a bicycle in public traffic. All attached components must be approved. The admission requires additional restrictions such as a dynamo as energy source with a nominal voltage of 6 V. Batteries are only allowed in addition to this. To adopt the German bicycle regulation to the state of art of an energy efficient lighting, additional power sources such as a battery respectively rechargeable batterie should be evaluated. The project will propose amendments for German Road Traffic Regulations and technical requirements.
A series of drop tests and vehicle tests with the adult head impactor according to Regulation (EC) 631/2009 and drop tests with the phantom head impactor according to UN Regulation No. 43 have been carried out by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development (BMVBS). Aim of the test series was to study the injury risk for vulnerable road users, especially pedestrians, in case of being impacted by a motor vehicle in a way described within the European Regulations (EC) 78/2009 and (EC) 631/2009. Furthermore, the applicability of the phantom head drop test described in UN Regulation No. 43 for plastic glazing should be investigated. In total, 30 drop tests, thereof 18 with the adult head impactor and 12 with the phantom head impactor, and 49 vehicle tests with the adult head impactor were carried out on panes of laminated safety glass (VSG), polycarbonate (PC) and laminated polycarbonate (L-PC). The influence of parameters such as the particular material properties, test point locations, fixations, ambient conditions (temperature and impact angle) was investigated in detail. In general, higher values of the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) were observed in tests on polycarbonate glazing. As the HIC is the current criterion for the assessment of head injury risk, polycarbonate glazing has to be seen as more injurious in terms of vulnerable road user protection. In addition, the significantly higher rebound of the head observed in tests with polycarbonate glazing is suspected to lead to higher neck loads and may also cause higher injury risks in secondary impacts of vulnerable road users. However, as in all tests with PC glazing no damage of the panes was observed, the risk of skin cut injuries may be expected to be reduced significantly. The performed test series give no indication for the test procedure prescribed in UN Regulation No. 43 as a methodology to approve glass windscreen not being feasible for polycarbonate glazing, as all PC panes tested fulfilled the UN R 43 requirements. The performance of the windscreen area will not be relevant for vehicle type approval according to the upcoming UN Regulation for pedestrian protection. However, it is recommended that pedestrian protection being considered for plastic windscreens to ensure at least the same level of protection as glass windscreens.
Although the bus belongs to the safest traffic means, single accidents can be particularly severe and concern many passengers. Especially in case of fires a high number of injured and killed persons can be the outcome. Fire safety of buses therefore is of high importance. With the increase of plastic materials as a material for the interior equipment of buses and coaches due to their good mechanical properties combined with low weight, the question arises whether the safety level has decreased in case of a fire during the last years " also compared to other means of transport. Because of the combustible plastics and their ability to release a high amount of heat the main fire load in buses is no longer the fuel but the plastic materials which are also often easy to ignite. Besides the flammability of the equipments, also the production of smoke, the smoke development and propagation as well as its toxicity are of interest. That counts for the passengers as well as for the test methods and its limit values. The severe fire in Germany near Hanover in 2008 with 20 fatalities showed how disastrous such fires can be. For those reasons several research projects were initiated on behalf of the German Federal Highway Research Institute. At the one hand the fire behaviour of coach interiors was examined in general focusing on fire propagation as well as fire detection and signalling. As result, recommendations with regard to early fire detection systems for the engine compartments and onboard extinguishing equipment were elaborated. On the other hand research was carried out to examine heat release, smoke, smoke propagation and its toxicity due to burning bus interior materials. In this project small and real scale experiments on material specimens, interior parts and vehicles were performed. Trains and buses often have very similar operation conditions. Consequently, bus interior material was tested according to the regulations for rail vehicles, i.e. DIN EN 45545 as well as DIN 5510. None of the tested bus interior materials would have been allowed to use in a train. The fire safety regulations for bus materials are on a low level compared to other transport sectors, i.e. railway, ship and aircraft. Also numerical investigations with the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) were performed. The very rapid fire development during the severe bus fire from 2008 could be predicted with the numerical model. The model was then used to investigate the influence of different materials, ventilation conditions and ignition sources. The bus materials contribute significantly to a very rapid fire development in bus fires. Especially, the flammable ceiling and the passenger seats were identified to be key issues of the fire propagation in a bus and can be explained by the rapid fire spread along the ceiling and the high fire load of passenger seats. As conclusion of the project effective and economically reasonable fire safety requirements for interiors of buses are recommended which would improve the current situation. Proposals for amendments of current requirements are recommended including the specification of appropriate limit values. In particular, it is taken into consideration which reasonable fire safety standards from other transport sectors, especially the rail sector, should be transferred to buses
Die verschärften Anforderungen an das Emissionsverhalten von Pkw und leichten Nutzfahrzeugen haben aufwändige Technologien erforderlich gemacht. Ein wesentlicher Bestandteil aktueller Abgasnachbehandlungssysteme ist der Katalysator. Wenn ein Katalysator beschädigt wird oder seine Wirksamkeit nachlässt, kann er durch einen Austauschkatalysator ersetzt werden. Austauschkatalysatoren, die im Zubehörmarkt angeboten werden, werden auf Basis der Regelung Nr. 103 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UNECE - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) genehmigt. Entsprechend dieser Regelung muss der Austauschkatalysator so beschaffen sein und so eingebaut werden können, dass das Fahrzeug den Vorschriften der Regelungen entspricht, die bei seiner Typprüfung zu Grunde gelegt worden sind. Außerdem müssen die Schadstoffemissionen während der gesamten normalen Lebensdauer des Fahrzeuges unter normalen Betriebsbedingungen wirksam begrenzt werden. Im Rahmen des Forschungsvorhabens wurde die Dauerhaltbarkeit von Austauschkatalysatoren untersucht. Als Testfahrzeug wurde ein VW Golf der Abgasstufe Euro 4 mit einem 1.4-l-Benzinmotor (55 kW) ausgewaehlt. Bei Beginn der Untersuchungen wies das Fahrzeug eine Laufleistung von 75.500 km auf. Das ausgewählte Fahrzeug war regelmäßig entsprechend den Herstellervorgaben gewartet worden. Im OBD-System waren keine abgasrelevanten Fehler abgelegt. Bei der Eingangsmessung des Fahrzeuges im Anlieferungszustand mit dem ursprünglich verbauten Katalysator wurden die anzuwendenden Euro 4-Grenzwerte deutlich unterschritten. Anschließend wurden ein Original-Austauschkatalysator, der in einer markengebundenen Fachwerkstatt, und 4 Katalysatoren, die verdeckt im freien Teilemarkt beschafft worden waren, untersucht. Die Austauschkatalysatoren wurden entsprechend den Vorgaben der ECE Regelung Nr. 103 konditioniert und dann im Neuzustand vermessen. Anschließend wurden die Katalysatoren auf einem Brennerprüfstand gealtert. Dabei wurde eine Laufleistung von insgesamt 80.000 km simuliert. Nach 10.000 km und 40.000 km wurde die Alterung unterbrochen und die Abgasemissionen des Testfahrzeugs wurden mit den gealterten Katalysatoren gemessen. Sobald bei einem Katalysator eine Grenzwertüberschreitung festgestellt wurde, wurde die Untersuchung beendet. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung zeigen, dass bei im freien Teilemarkt erhältlichen Austauschsystemen zur Abgasnachbehandlung erhebliche Qualitätsunterschiede auftreten können. Nur mit dem Original-Austauschkatalysator und mit einem Austauschkatalysator, der im freien Markt beschafft worden war, konnten auch nach einer Alterung über 80.000 km die Euro 4 Grenzwerte eingehalten werden. Bei einem Austauschkatalysator wurden bereits im Neuzustand die Euro 4 Grenzwerte überschritten. Bei einem anderen Austauschkatalysator wurde die Untersuchung nach 10.000 km Alterung und bei einem weiteren Katalysator nach 40.000 km Alterung aufgrund einer Überschreitung der Euro 4 Grenzwerte abgebrochen. Die ECE Regelung Nr. 103 sieht eine Prüfung der Dauerhaltbarkeit derartiger Systeme über 80.000 km vor, ermöglicht jedoch alternativ die Verwendung von festen Verschlechterungsfaktoren. In der Praxis wird die Dauerhaltbarkeit der Austauschsysteme zur Abgasnachbehandlung von ihren Herstellern garantiert, eine Überprüfung findet im Rahmen der Genehmigung jedoch in den seltensten Fällen statt. Eine Feldüberwachung für Austauschsysteme zur Abgasnachbehandlung ist in den entsprechenden Vorschriften nicht vorgesehen. Die Ergebnisse dieser Untersuchung weisen darauf hin, dass die Anforderungen in der ECE Regelung Nr. 103 nicht ausreichen, um die Dauerhaltbarkeit von Austauschkatalysatoren sicherzustellen.
Automatische Lenkfunktionen sind abgesehen von korrigierenden Lenkeingriffen entsprechend der UN-Regelung Nr. 79 bisher nur in einem Geschwindigkeitsbereich bis 10 km/h erlaubt. Die Weiterentwicklung der Technik im Bereich der Fahrerassistenzsysteme und der Automatisierung der Fahraufgabe wuerden es jedoch technisch erlauben, automatische Lenkfunktionen auch bei höheren Geschwindigkeiten einzusetzen. Neben einem Zugewinn an Komfort wird von diesen Systemen auch ein Beitrag zur Erhöhung der Verkehrssicherheit erwartet. Dieses Verkehrssicherheitspotenzial wird man jedoch nur ausschöpfen können, wenn die automatisierten Lenksysteme entsprechend gestaltet sind. Insbesondere sollten mögliche Risiken auf Grund automatischen Lenkens minimiert sein. Aus diesen Gründen laufen derzeit Arbeiten auf UNECE-Ebene, die Regelung Nr. 79 über einheitliche Bedingungen für die Genehmigung der Fahrzeuge hinsichtlich der Lenkanlage in Bezug auf automatische Lenkfunktionen (ACSF = Automatically Commanded Steering Functions) zu überarbeiten, um diese unter bestimmten Bedingungen auch bei höheren Geschwindigkeiten genehmigen zu können. Der vorliegende Beitrag reflektiert diese Arbeiten und stellt die Entwicklung der technischen Anforderungen an automatisches Lenken und der für die fahrzeugtechnischen Vorschriften vorgesehenen Testprozeduren dar.
The UN Regulation No. 79 is going to be amended to allow automatically commanded steering functions (ACSF) at speeds above 10 km/h. Hence, requirements concerning the approval of automatically performed steering manoeuvres have to be set in order to allow safe use of automatic steering on public roads as well as improve overall road safety for the driver and the surroundings. By order of the German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI), BASt developed and verified physical test procedures for automatic steering to be implemented in UN Regulation No. 79. The usability of currently available test tools was examined. The paper at hand describes these test procedures and presents results from verification tests. The designated tests are divided in three sections: functionality tests, verifications for the transition of control and emergency tests. System functionality tests are auto matic lane keeping, automatic lane change and an automatic abort of an initiated lane change due to traffic. Those tests check if the vehicle remains in its lane (under normal operating conditions), is able to perform safe automatic lane change manoeuvres and if it considers other road users during its manoeuvres. Transition tests examine the vehicle's behaviour when the driver fails to monitor the system and in situations when the system has to hand over the steering control back to the driver. For instance these tests provoke driver-in-the-loop requests by approaching system boundary limitations, like missing lane markings, surpassing maximum lateral acceleration in a bend or even a major system failure. Even further the driver and his inputs are monitored and if the system detects that he is overriding system actions or contrary want to quit the driving task and unfastens the seat belt, it has to shut down and put the human back into manually control and the responsibility of driving. The last series of test consists of two emergency situations in which the system has to react to a time critical event: A hard decelerating vehicle and a stationary vehicle in front both with no lane change possibility for the ACSF vehicle. Some of the tests, especially the emergency manoeuvres, require special target vehicles and propulsion systems. Since no fully automatic steering vehicles are available, a current Mercedes E-Class with Mercedes' "drive pilot" system was used. It was shown that the vehicle is automatically able to brake to a full stop towards a static Euro NCAP target from partial-automatic driving at 90 km/h, that it could brake towards a rapidly decelerating lead vehicle when travelling at 70 km/h, that it was able during partially automatic driving to remain in its lane in normal operation conditions and to perform a automatic (driver initiated) lane change while surveilling the driver- activities.
Schutz von schwächeren Verkehrsteilnehmern: kommende Anforderungen aus Gesetzgebung und Euro NCAP
(2017)
Systeme der aktiven Fahrzeugsicherheit, insbesondere Notbremsassistenzsysteme und automatische Notbremssysteme, haben in den letzten zwei Dekaden große technische Fortschritte gemacht, und das im Wesentlichen ohne "Druck" von Gesetzgeber oder unabhängigen Testorganisationen " diese können aber durch passende Anforderungen den Vormarsch der Systeme in die Breite und die Ausnutzung von ansonsten für den Hersteller vielleicht nicht wirtschaftlichen Potentialen unterstützen. Dieser Bericht hat das Ziel, einen Überblick über die kommenden Anforderungen an Schutzsysteme für schwächere Verkehrsteilnehmer zu geben und diese Anforderungen in den Kontext Euro NCAP (=welchen Einfluss haben diese Anforderungen auf die Gesamtbewertung?) sowie Gesetzgebung (schwächere Anforderungen, aber dafür ein Markteintrittskriterium) zu stellen: - Anforderungen und Testprozeduren für Notbremsassistenz Fahrradunfälle 2018 und 2020 in Euro NCAP; - Anforderungen und Testprozeduren für Notbremsassistenz bei Nachtunfällen mit Fußgängern in Euro NCAP 2018; - Anforderungen und Testprozeduren für Abbiegeassistenzsysteme zum Schutz von Radfahrern in Unfallsituationen mit rechtsabbiegenden Lkw innerhalb der Fahrzeugtypgenehmigung.
Except for corrective steering functions automatic steering is up to now only allowed at speeds up to 10 km/h according to UN Regulation No. 79. Progress in automotive engineering with regard to driver assistance systems and automation of driving tasks is that far that it would be technically feasible to realise automatically commanded steering functions also at higher vehicle speeds. Besides improvements in terms of comfort these automated systems are expected to contribute to road traffic safety as well. However, this safety potential will only be exhausted if automated steering systems are properly designed. Especially possible new risks due to automated steering have to be addressed and reduced to a minimum. For these reasons work is currently ongoing on UNECE level with the aim to amend the regulation dealing with provisions concerning the approval of steering equipment. It is the aim to revise requirements for automatically commanded steering functions (ACSF) so that they can be approved also for higher speeds if certain performance requirements are fulfilled. The paper at hand describes the derivation of reasonable system specifications from an analysis of relevant driving situations with an automated steering system. Needs are explained with regard to covering normal driving, sudden unexpected critical events, transition to manual driving, driver availability and manoeuvres to reach a state of minimal risk. These issues form the basis for the development of test procedures for automated steering to be implemented in international regulations. This holds for system functionalities like automatic lane keeping or automatic lane change as well as for addressing transition situations in which the system has to hand over steering to the driver or addressing emergency situations in which the system has to react instead of the driver.
Anforderungen, Zielkonflikte
(2019)
Um Sicherheit und Umweltverträglichkeit von Straßen- bzw. Kraftfahrzeugen zu gewährleisten, werden an die Gestaltung der Fahrzeuge technische Anforderungen gestellt. Es gibt Anforderungen durch den Gesetzgeber, die erfüllt werden müssen, um ein Fahrzeug in den Verkehr bringen zu dürfen. Darüber hinaus bestehen herstellerinterne Anforderungen an das Produkt, die über das vom Gesetzgeber geforderte Maß hinausgehen, um den Kundenwünschen und der Firmenphilosophie zu genügen. Und als dritter Punkt stellen auch Verbraucherschutz-Organisationen Kriterien auf, anhand derer sie die Eigenschaften der auf dem Markt befindlichen Fahrzeuge bewerten und die Fahrzeuge eingruppieren, was dann der Kundeninformation dient. Auch diese Anforderungen gehen über die des Gesetzgebers hinaus. Das Setzen der gesetzlichen Mindestanforderungen ist für die Fahrzeugtechnik mittlerweile jedoch nicht mehr einzelnen Staaten überlassen. Vielmehr sind die für die Genehmigung von Fahrzeugtypen einzuhaltenden Bedingungen international harmonisiert: Für die EU sind dies EU-Richtlinien oder EU-Verordnungen, die von der Europäischen Kommission in Brüssel vorgeschlagen werden. Für über die EU hinausgehende Staaten bzw. Regionen sind dies unter anderem Regelungen der UN, erstellt von der UN-Wirtschaftskommission für Europa (UNECE) in Genf.
The term driver assistance systems in the chapter title shall be understood to include vehicle automation. This chapter starts with a homogeneous and consistent classification and nomenclature of all kinds of driver assistance systems known and under discussion today (including vehicle automation). It thereby builds upon familiar classification schemes by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and the standardization body SAE international. Detailed evaluation of the German legal situation for driver assistance systems and vehicle automation is provided in the following Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, an overview is given on the legal system in the US to reveal aspects relevant for vehicle automation. This is intended as initial information for those not acquainted to the US legal system which has been the first to regulate automation in several federal states. Finally, in Sect. 4, the current rating scheme of the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) is presented in comparison to legal instruments. The model of a consumer protection based approach proves to be a flexible instrument with great advantages in promoting new technologies. Technical vehicle regulations on the other hand rule minimum requirements. Both approaches are needed to achieve maximum vehicle safety.