Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (4) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Collision (4) (entfernen)
Institut
In der amtlichen Statistik der Unfälle wird zwischen "Abkommen von der Fahrbahn nach links" und "Abkommen nach rechts" unterschieden. Jene Unfälle sind nicht erfasst, bei denen es zunächst auf der Fahrbahn zu einem leichten Zusammenstoß kommt, infolge dessen ein Auto von der Fahrbahn abkommt, wobei unter Umständen schwere Unfallfolgen entstehen. Im Jahre 1984 wurden unter Unfallart "Abkommen" 2.092 Getötete = 28,5 % aller im Straßenverkehr 1984 Getöteten ausgewiesen. Die Verteilung der Unfälle auf Innerortsstraßen, Landstraßen und Autobahnen wird angegeben. Die Unfallschwere beim Abkommen nach rechts ist bedeutend größer als beim Abkommen nach links. Mehr als 80 % der abkommenden Fahrzeuge verlassen die Fahrbahn unter 20 Grad. Die größere Unfallschwere beim Abkommen nach rechts wird auf Fehlen von Schutzplanken zurückgeführt. Der günstige Einfluss von Randmarkierungen wird nicht erwähnt. An der Zahl schwerer Unfallfolgen haben Bäume an Landstraßen einen 50 %-Anteil. Sie sollten 5 m, in Außenkurven 10 m vom Fahrbahnrand entfernt sein, andernfalls durch Buschgruppen ersetzt oder durch Schutzplanken geschützt werden. Würde man durch wirksame Maßnahmen die Unfälle durch Abkommen nach rechts auf die Zahl der Unfälle durch Abkommen nach links reduzieren, würden sich die volkswirtschaftlichen Kosten um rund. 3 Mrd. DM jährlich vermindern.
To improve vehicle safety in frontal collisions, the crash compatibility between the colliding vehicles is crucial. Compatibility aims to improve both the self and partner protection properties of vehicles. Although compatibility has received worldwide attention for many years, no final assessment approach has been defined. Within the Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research (FIMCAR) project, different frontal impact test procedures (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test as currently used for Economic Commission for Europe [ECE] R94, progressive deformable barrier test as proposed by France for a new ECE regulation, moveable deformable barrier test as discussed worldwide, full-width rigid barrier test as used in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard [FMVSS] 208, and full-width deformable barrier test) were analyzed regarding their potential for future frontal impact legislation. The research activities focused on car-to-car frontal impact accidents based on accident investigations involving newer cars. Test procedures were developed with both a crash test program and numerical simulations. The proposal from FIMCAR is to use a full-width test procedure with a deformable element and compatibility metrics in combination with the current offset test as a frontal impact assessment approach that also addresses compatibility. By adding a full-width test to the current ODB test it is possible to better address the issues of structural misalignment and injuries resulting from high acceleration accidents as observed in the current fleet. The estimated benefit ranges from a 5 to 12 percent reduction of fatalities and serious injuries resulting from frontal impact accidents. By using a deformable element in the full-width test, the test conditions are more representative of real-world situations with respect to acceleration pulse, restraint system triggering time, and deformation pattern of the front structure. The test results are therefore expected to better represent real-world performance of the tested car. Furthermore, the assessment of the structural alignment is more robust than in the rigid wall test.
It is commonly agreed that active safety will have a significant impact on reducing accident figures for pedestrians and probably also bicyclists. However, chances and limitations for active safety systems have only been derived based on accident data and the current state of the art, based on proprietary simulation models. The objective of this article is to investigate these chances and limitations by developing an open simulation model. This article introduces a simulation model, incorporating accident kinematics, driving dynamics, driver reaction times, pedestrian dynamics, performance parameters of different autonomous emergency braking (AEB) generations, as well as legal and logical limitations. The level of detail for available pedestrian accident data is limited. Relevant variables, especially timing of the pedestrian appearance and the pedestrian's moving speed, are estimated using assumptions. The model in this article uses the fact that a pedestrian and a vehicle in an accident must have been in the same spot at the same time and defines the impact position as a relevant accident parameter, which is usually available from accident data. The calculations done within the model identify the possible timing available for braking by an AEB system as well as the possible speed reduction for different accident scenarios as well as for different system configurations. The simulation model identifies the lateral impact position of the pedestrian as a significant parameter for system performance, and the system layout is designed to brake when the accident becomes unavoidable by the vehicle driver. Scenarios with a pedestrian running from behind an obstruction are the most demanding scenarios and will very likely never be avoidable for all vehicle speeds due to physical limits. Scenarios with an unobstructed person walking will very likely be treatable for a wide speed range for next generation AEB systems.
The goal of the project FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) was to define an integrated set of test procedures and associated metrics to assess a vehicle's frontal impact protection, which includes self- and partner-protection. For the development of the set, two different full-width tests (full-width deformable barrier [FWDB] test, full-width rigid barrier test) and three different offset tests (offset deformable barrier [ODB] test, progressive deformable barrier [PDB] test, moveable deformable barrier with the PDB barrier face [MPDB] test) have been investigated. Different compatibility assessment procedures were analysed and metrics for assessing structural interaction (structural alignment, vertical and horizontal load spreading) as well as several promising metrics for the PDB/MPDB barrier were developed. The final assessment approach consists of a combination of the most suitable full-width and offset tests. For the full-width test (FWDB), a metric was developed to address structural alignment based on load cell wall information in the first 40 ms of the test. For the offset test (ODB), the existing ECE R94 was chosen. Within the paper, an overview of the final assessment approach for the frontal impact test procedures and their development is given.