Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (24)
- Buch (Monographie) (10)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (3)
- Arbeitspapier (2)
Schlagworte
- Unfall (39) (entfernen)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (39) (entfernen)
Recent accident statistics from the German national database state bicyclists being the second endangered group of vulnerable road users besides pedestrians. With 399 fatalities, more than 14.000 seriously injured and more than 61.000 slightly injured persons on german roads in the year 2011, the group of bicyclists is ranked second of all road user groups (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2012). While the overall bicycle helmet usage frequency in Germany is very low, evidence is given that its usage leads to a significant reduction of severe head injuries. After an estimation of the benefit of bicycle helmet usage as well as an appropriate test procedure for bicyclists, this paper describes two different approaches for the improvement of bicyclist safety. While the first one is focusing on the assessment of the vehicle based protection potential for bicyclists, the second one is concentrating on the safety assessment of bicycle helmets. Within the first part of the study the possible revision of the existing pedestrian testing protocols is being examined, using in depth accident data, full scale simulation and hardware testing. Within the second part of the study, the results of tests according to supplemental test procedures for the safety assessment of bicycle helmets developed by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) are presented. An additional full scale test performed at reduced impact speed proves that measures of active vehicle safety as e.g. braking before the collision event do not necessarily always lead to a reduction of injury severity.
Within this paper different European accident data sources were used to investigate the causations and backgrounds of road traffic accidents with pedestrians. Analyses of high level national data and in-depth accident data from Germany and Great Britain was used to confirm and refine preliminary accident scenarios identified from other sources using a literature review. General observations made included that a high proportion of killed or seriously injured pedestrian casualties impacted by cars were in "dark" light conditions. Seven accident scenarios were identified (each divided into "daylight" and "dark" light conditions) which included the majority of the car front-to-pedestrian crash configurations. Test scenarios were developed using the identified accident scenarios and relevant parameters. Hypothetical parameters were derived to describe the performance of pedestrian pre-crash systems based on the assumption that these systems are designed to avoid false positives as a very high priority, i.e. at virtually all costs. As result, three "Base Test Scenarios" were selected to be developed in detail in the AsPeCSS project. However, further Enhanced Test Scenarios may be needed to address environmental factors such as darkness if it is determined that system performance is sensitive to these factors. Finally, weighting factors for the accident scenarios for Europe (EU-27) were developed by averaging and extrapolation of the available data. This paper represents interim results of Work Package 1 within the AsPeCSS project.
The EVERSAFE project addressed many safety issues for electric vehicles including the crash and post-crash safety. The project reviewed the market shares of full electric and hybrid vehicles, latest road traffic accident data involving severely damaged electric vehicles in Europe, and identified critical scenarios that may be particular for electric vehicles. Also, recent results from international research on the safety of electric vehicles were included in this paper such as results from performed experimental abuse cell and vehicle crash tests (incl. non-standardized tests with the Mitsubishi i-MiEV and the BMW i3), from discussions in the UN IG REESS and the GTR EVS as well as guidelines (handling procedures) for fire brigades from Germany, Sweden and the United States of America. Potential hazards that might arise from damaged electric vehicles after severe traffic accidents are an emerging issue for modern vehicles and were summarized from the perspective of different national approaches and discussed from the practical view of fire fighters. Recent rescue guidelines were reviewed and used as the basis for a newly developed rescue procedure. The paper gives recommendations in particular towards fire fighters, but also to vehicle manufacturers and first-aiders.
A reduction of around 48% of all road fatalities was achieved in Europe in the past years including a reduced number of fatalities with an older age. However, among all road fatalities, the proportion of elderly is steadily increasing. In an ageing society, the European (Horizon2020) project SENIORS aims to improve the safe mobility of older road users, who have different transportation habits compared to other age groups. To increase their level of safe mobility by determining appropriate requirements for vehicle safety systems, the characteristics of current road traffic collisions involving the elderly and the injuries that they sustain need to be understood in detail. Hereby, the paper focuses on their traffic participation as pedestrian, cyclist or passenger car occupant. Following a literature review, several national and international crash databases and hospital statistics have been analysed to determine the body regions most frequently and severely injured, specific injuries sustained and types of crashes involved, always comparing older road users (65 years and more) with mid-aged road users (25-64 years). The most important crash scenarios were highlighted. The data sources included European statistics from CARE, data on national level from Germany, Sweden, Italy, United Kingdom and Spain as well as in-depth crash information from GIDAS (Germany), RAIDS (UK), CIREN and NASS-CDS (US). In addition, familiar hospital data from Germany (TraumaRegister DGU-®), Italy (Italian Register of Acute Traumas) and UK hospital statistics (TARN) were included in the study to gain further insight into specific injury patterns. Comprehensive data analyses were performed showing injury patterns of older road users in crashes. When comparing with mid-aged road users, all databases showed that the thorax body region is of particularly high importance for the older car occupant with injury severities of AIS 2 or AIS 3+, whereas the body regions lower extremities, head and thorax need to be considered for the older pedestrians and cyclists. Besides these comparisons, the most frequent and severe top 5 injuries were highlighted per road user group. Further, the most important crash configurations were identified and injury risk functions are provided per age group and road user group. Although several databases have been analysed, the picture on the road safety situation of older road users in Europe was not complete, as only Western European data was available. The linkage between crash data and hospital data could only be made on a general level as their inclusion criteria were quite different.
Europe has benefited from a decreasing number of road traffic fatalities. However, the proportion of older road users increases steadily. In an ageing society, the SENIORS project aims to improve the safe mobility of older road users by determining appropriate requirements towards passive vehicle safety systems. Therefore, the characteristics of road traffic crashes involving the elderly people need to be understood. This paper focuses on car occupants and pedestrians or cyclists in crashes with modern passenger cars. Ten crash databases and four hospital statistics from Europe have been analysed to answer the questions on which body regions are most frequently and severely injured in the elderly, and specific injuries sustained by always comparing older (65 years and above) with midâ€aged road users (25â€64 years). It was found that the body region thorax is of particularly high importance for the older car occupant with injury severities of AIS2 or AIS3+, where as the lower extremities, head and the thorax need to be considered for older pedestrians and cyclists. Further, injury risk functions were provided. The hospital data analysis showed less difference between the age groups. The linkage between crash and hospital data could only be made on a general level as their inclusion criteria were quite different.
The presence and performance of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) has increased over last years. Systems available on the market address also conflicts with vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists. Within the European project PROSPECT (Horizon2020, funded by the EC) improved VRU ADAS systems are developed and tested. However, before determining systems" properties and starting testing, an up-to-date analysis of VRU crashes was needed in order to derive the most important Use Cases (detailed crash descriptions) the systems should address. Besides the identified Accident Scenarios (basic crash descriptions), this paper describes in short the method of deriving the Use Cases for car-to-cyclist crashes. Method Crashes involving one passenger car and one cyclist were investigated in several European crash databases looking for all injury severity levels (slight, severe and fatal). These data sources included European statistics from CARE, data on national level from Germany, Sweden and Hungary as well as detailed accident information from these three countries using GIDAS, the Volvo Cars Cyclist Accident database and Hungarian in-depth accident data, respectively. The most frequent accident scenarios were studied and Use Cases were derived considering the key aspects of these crash situations (e.g., view orientation of the cyclist and the car driver- manoeuvre intention) and thus, form an appropriate basis for the development of Test Scenarios. Results Latest information on car-to-cyclist crashes in Europe was compiled including details on the related crash configurations, driving directions, outcome in terms of injury severity, accident location, other environmental aspects and driver responsibilities. The majority of car-to-cyclist crashes occurred during daylight and in clear weather conditions. Car-to-cyclist crashes in which the vehicle was traveling straight and the cyclist is moving in line with the traffic were found to result in the greatest number of fatalities. Considering also slightly and seriously injured cyclists led to a different order of crash patterns according to the three considered European countries. Finally the paper introduced the Use Cases derived from the crash data analysis. A total of 29 Use Cases were derived considering the group of seriously or fatally injured cyclists and 35 Use Cases were derived considering the group of slightly, seriously or fatally injured cyclists. The highest ranked Use Case describes the collision between a car turning to the nearside and a cyclist riding on a bicycle lane against the usual driving direction. A unified European dataset on car-to-cyclist crash scenarios is not available as the data available in CARE is limited, hence national datasets had to be used for the study and further work will be required to extrapolate the results to a European level. Due to the large number of Use Cases, the paper shows only highest ranked ones.
The Intersection 2020 project was initiated to develop a test procedure for Automatic Emergency Braking systems in intersection car-to-car scenarios to be transferred to Euro NCAP. The project aims to address current road traffic accidents on European roads and therefore sets a priority of the identification of the most important car-to-car accidents and Use Cases. Taking into account technological and practical limitations, Test Scenarios are derived from the Use Cases in a later stage of the project. This paper presents parts of a larger study and provides an overview of common car-to-vehicle(at least four wheels) collision types at junctions in Europe and specifies seven Accident Scenarios from which the three scenarios “Straight Crossing Paths (SCP)”, “Left Turn Across Path – Opposite Direction Conflict (LTAP/OD)” and “Left Turn Across Path – Lateral Direction (LTAP/LD)” are most important due to their high relevance regarding severe car-to-car accidents. Technical details about crash parameters such as collision and initial speeds are delivered. The analysis work performed is input for the definition and selection of the Use Cases as well as for the project’s benefit estimation. The numbers of accidents and fatalities in accidents at intersections involving a passenger car were shown per intersection type. In both statistics, it was found that accidents at crossroads and T- or staggered junctions are of highest relevance, followed by roundabouts. Focusing on accidents at intersections between one passenger car and another road user shows that around one-third of all accidents and related fatalities could have been assigned to car-to-PTW accidents and one-fifth of all accidents and fatalities to car-to-car accidents. Regarding car-to-car accidents with at least serious injury outcome 38% out of 34,489 car-to-car accidents happened at intersections. These figures correspond to 18% of the fatalities (4,236 fatalities in total). Considering all intersection types, around half of all related accidents happened in urban environments whereas this number decreased to one-third of all fatalities. Further, the proportion of road fatalities per country occurring at intersections varies widely across the EU. Also, there are proportionately more fatalities in daylight or twilight conditions at junctions. Use Cases are supposed to be derived from Accident Scenarios and by adding detailed information for example about the road layout, right-of-way and the vehicle trajectories prior to the collision. Instead of applying cluster algorithms to the accident data, a pragmatic approach was finally preferred to create them. Note: Use Cases serve as an intermediate step between the Accident Scenarios and the Test Scenarios which describe the actual testing conditions. Finally, 74 Use Cases were identified. This large number indicates the complexity of intersection crashes due to the combination of several parameters.
Einfluss von Notbremssystemen auf die Entwicklung von Lkw-Auffahrunfällen auf Bundesautobahnen
(2021)
Auf deutschen Bundesautobahnen kommt es immer wieder zu schweren Auffahrunfällen, die von Güterkraftfahrzeugen oder Bussen verursacht werden. Moderne Notbremsassistenzsysteme (AEBS), wie sie schon seit vielen Jahren in Personenkraftwagen verbaut werden, haben das Potenzial, eine große Anzahl dieser Unfälle vollständig zu vermeiden oder die Unfallfolgen abzumildern. Daher hat die Europäische Kommission mit dem Inkrafttreten der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 347/2012 in einem zweistufigen Verfahren die pflichtmäßige Ausstattung von Güterkraftfahrzeugen (GKfz) und Bussen mit einem Notbremssystem vorgeschrieben.
Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, die Auswirkungen des Inkrafttretens der Verordnung hinsichtlich des Unfallgeschehen auf Bundesautobahnen zu untersuchen bzw. den Maßnahmeneffekt der Einführung von Notbremssystemen zu ermitteln. Die Grundlage der Auswertungen bilden die Einzeldaten der amtlichen Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik für die Jahre 2009 bis 2018 und ergänzende fahrzeugtechnische Angaben des Kraftfahrtbundesamtes. Letztere Angaben liegen nur für in Deutschland zugelassene Fahrzeuge vor, wodurch sich der Untersuchungsbereich auf eben diese Fahrzeuge beschränkte. Die Verordnung gilt für die Fahrzeugklassen M2, M3, N2 und N3, beinhaltet jedoch einige Ausnahmen. Für die Auswertung wurden die Fahrzeugklassen, für die das AEBS verpflichtend ist, daher mithilfe der Verkehrsbeteiligungsart in den Unfalldaten abgegrenzt. Auf diese Weise wurden neun Verkehrsbeteiligungsarten den Güterkraftfahrzeugen zugeordnet und eine Verkehrsbeteiligungsart den Bussen.
Notbremsassistenzsysteme dienen vornehmlich der Vermeidung von Auffahrunfällen, sodass zunächst ausgehend von Unfalltyp und Unfallart das Unfallszenario Auffahrunfall abgegrenzt wurde. Ergänzend wurden zwei weitere Unfallszenarien gebildet, nämlich die Spurverlassen-Unfälle und die anderen Unfälle. Untersucht wurden Unfälle mit Personenschaden und schwerwiegende Unfälle mit Sachschaden im engeren Sinne, die von Güterkraftfahrzeugen und Bussen auf Bundesautobahnen verursacht wurden.
Innerhalb der Gruppe der als GKfz bzw. Busse abgegrenzten Fahrzeuge nahm die Anzahl der Unfälle im Zeitraum von 2009 bis 2018 um 6,5 % leicht zu. Die Unfallzahlen entwickelten sich jedoch besser, je jünger die Fahrzeuge waren. Fahrzeuge mit einem Alter von weniger als fünf Jahren wiesen rückläufige Unfallzahlen auf. Während die Anzahl der Spurverlassen-Unfälle und der anderen Unfälle konstant bis leicht rückläufig war, stieg die Gesamtzahl der Auffahrunfälle mit einem Zuwachs von 21 % deutlich an.
Der Bestand von Lkw und Zugmaschinen mit einer zulässigen Gesamtmasse über 8 t nahm in den Jahren 2012 bis 2018 zu, wobei insbesondere der Bestand älterer Fahrzeuge angewachsen ist. Die Unfallrate blieb hingegen nahezu konstant, während die Unfallbelastung im gleichen Zeitraum um 11,7 % gesunken ist.
Der Gesamteffekt der Maßnahme, welcher angibt, wie stark sich die Unfallzahlen von Güterkraftfahrzeugen und Bussen vom Vor- zum Analysezeitraum durch Notbremssysteme insgesamt reduziert haben, wurde mithilfe von Odds Ratios ermittelt. Neben der Untersuchungsgruppe wurden drei Vergleichsgruppen definiert, sodass der Gesamteffekt aus den einzelnen Veränderungen aller vier Gruppen vom Vor- zum Analysezeitraum bestimmt werden konnte. Die Vergleichsgruppen wurden so definiert, dass sie von der Maßnahme nicht betroffen waren. Der Gesamteffekt (Maßnahmeneffekt) beläuft sich auf 37 % und ist signifikant. Aufgrund der sehr trennscharfen Eingrenzung der Untersuchungsgruppe auf Fahrzeuge, die sicher mit AEBS ausgestattet sind, und auf Auffahrunfälle, auf deren Vermeidung AEBS bestimmungsgemäß abzielt, ist ein Effekt von 37 % in Bezug auf seine Größenordnung durchaus zu erwarten. Die Wirkung der ersten Stufe der EU-Verordnung mit noch verhältnismäßig geringen Anforderungen wird mit dem ermittelten Gesamteffekt vermutlich etwas überschätzt, da sich unter den Fahrzeugen mit AEBS auch solche befinden, die bereits vorzeitig das geforderte Leistungsvermögen der zweiten Stufe der EU-Verordnung erfüllen, und auch solche, die in Bezug auf ihr Leistungsvermögen freiwillig noch weiter darüber hinausgehen.4
Außerdem wurde untersucht, ob neben den Unfallzahlen auch eine Veränderung der Verletzungsschwere verzeichnet werden kann. Es konnte ein deutlicher Rückgang der Zahl der Schwerverletzten vom Vor- zum Analysezeitraum beim Vergleich von Untersuchungsgruppe und der ersten Vergleichsgruppe festgestellt werden.
Insgesamt deuten die Ergebnisse darauf hin, dass durch die verpflichtende Ausstattung von Güterkraftfahrzeugen und Bussen mit einem Notbremssystem nicht nur die Unfallzahlen deutlich reduziert, sondern auch die Unfallschwere der verbleibenden Unfälle abgemildert wurde. Ungeachtet dessen zeigt die Analyse auch, dass trotz AEBS nach wie vor eine große Zahl nicht vermiedener Auffahrunfälle zu verzeichnen ist und hier somit weitere Schritte zur Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit von schweren Güterkraftfahrzeugen und Bussen erforderlich sind.
Die Beurteilung der technischen und unfallrelevanten Eigenschaften der beiden Scheibenarten zeigt, dass die VSG-Scheibe gegenüber der ESG-Scheibe hinsichtlich der Verletzungs- und Unfallgefahr zwar überwiegend Vorteile aufweist; diese Vorteile sind jedoch vor allem vor dem Hintergrund steigender Gurtanlegequoten nicht als so entscheidend anzusehen, dass daraus die Begründung für ein Verbot der ESG-Scheibe abzuleiten wäre. Diese Feststellung wird insbesondere auch gestützt durch eine Nutzen-Kosten-Betrachtung, die zeigt, dass aus gesamtwirtschaftlicher Sicht bei einem generellen Ersatz der ESG-Scheibe durch die teurere VSG-Scheibe bei günstigen Annahmen der Nutzen unter den Kosten liegen würde.
Since its beginning in 1999, the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) evolved into the presumably leading representative road traffic accident investigation in Europe, based on the work started in Hanover in 1973. The detailed and comprehensive description of traffic accidents forms an essential basis for vehicle safety research. Due to the ongoing extension of demands of researchers, there is a continuous progress in the techniques and systematic of accident investigation within GIDAS. This paper presents some of the most important developments over the last years. Primary vehicle safety systems are expected to have a significant and increasing influence on reducing accidents. GIDAS therefore began to include and collect active safety parameters as new variables from the year 2005 onwards. This will facilitate to assess the impact of present and future active safety measures. A new system to analyse causation factors of traffic accidents, called ACASS, was implemented in GIDAS in the year 2008. The whole process of data handling was optimised. Since 2005 the on-scene data acquisition is completely conducted with mobile tablet PCs. Comprehensive plausibility checks assure a high data quality. Multi-language codebooks are automatically generated from the database structure itself and interfaces ensure the connection to various database management systems. Members of the consortium can download database and codebook, and synchronize half a terabyte of photographic documentation through a secured online access. With the introduction of the AIS 2005 in the year 2006, some medical categorizations have been revised. To ensure the correct assignment of AIS codes to specific injuries an application based on a diagnostic dictionary was developed. Furthermore a coding tool for the AO classification was introduced. All these enhancements enable GIDAS to be up to date for future research questions.