Sonstige
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (43)
- Book (5)
- Article (4)
- Working Paper (2)
Keywords
- Schweregrad (Unfall (54) (remove)
Institute
- Sonstige (54) (remove)
Analysis of pedestrian leg contacts and distribution of contact points across the vehicle front
(2015)
Determining the risk to pedestrians that are impacted by areas of the front bumper not currently regulated in type-approval testing requires an understanding of the target population and the injury risk posed by the edges of the bumper. National statistics show that approximately 10% of all accident casualties are pedestrians, with 20% to 30% of these pedestrian casualties being killed or seriously injured. However, the contact position across the front of the bumper is not recorded in national statistics and so in-depth accident databases (OTS, UK and GIDAS, Germany) were used to examine injury risk in greater detail. The results showed that some injury types and severities of injuries appear to peak around the bumper edges. Although there are sometimes inconsistencies in the data, generally there is no evidence to suggest that the edges of the bumper are less likely to be contacted or cause injury.
The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Informal Group on GTR No. 7 Phase 2 are working to define a build level for the BioRID II rear impact (whiplash) crash test dummy that ensures repeatable and reproducible performance in a test procedure that has been proposed for future legislation. This includes the specification of dummy hardware, as well as the development of comprehensive certification procedures for the dummy. This study evaluated whether the dummy build level and certification procedures deliver the desired level of repeatability and reproducibility. A custom-designed laboratory seat was made using the seat base, back, and head restraint from a production car seat to ensure a representative interface with the dummy. The seat back was reinforced for use in multiple tests and the recliner mechanism was replaced by an external spring-damper mechanism. A total of 65 tests were performed with 6 BioRID IIg dummies using the draft GTR No.7 sled pulse and seating procedure. All dummies were subject to the build, maintenance, and certification procedures defined by the Informal Group. The test condition was highly repeatable, with a very repeatable pulse, a well-controlled seat back response, and minimal observed degradation of seat foams. The results showed qualitatively reasonable repeatability and reproducibility for the upper torso and head accelerations, as well as for T1 Fx and upper neck Fx. However, reproducibility was not acceptable for T1 and upper neck Fz or for T1 and upper neck My. The Informal Group has not selected injury or seat assessment criteria for use with BioRID II, so it is not known whether these channels would be used in the regulation. However, the ramping-up behavior of the dummy showed poor reproducibility, which would be expected to affect the reproducibility of dummy measurements in general. Pelvis and spine characteristics were found to significantly influence the dummy measurements for which poor reproducibility was observed. It was also observed that the primary neck response in these tests was flexion, not extension. This correlates well with recent findings from Japan and the United States showing a correlation between neck flexion and injury in accident replication simulations and postmortem human subjects (PMHS) studies, respectively. The present certification tests may not adequately control front cervical spine bumper characteristics, which are important for neck flexion response. The certification sled test also does not include the pelvis and so cannot be used to control pelvis response and does not substantially load the lumbar bumpers and so does not control these parts of the dummy. The stiffness of all spine bumpers and of the pelvis flesh should be much more tightly controlled. It is recommended that a method for certifying the front cervical bumpers should be developed. Recommendations are also made for tighter tolerance on the input parameters for the existing certification tests.
In general the passive safety capability is much greater in newer versus older cars due to the stiff compartment preventing intrusion in severe collisions. However, the stiffer structure which increases the deceleration can lead to a change in injury patterns. In order to analyse possible injury mechanisms for thoracic and lumbar spine injuries, data from the German Inâ€Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) were used in this study. A twoâ€step approach of statistical and caseâ€byâ€case analysis was applied for this investigation. In total 4,289 collisions were selected involving 8,844 vehicles, 5,765 injured persons and 9,468 coded injuries. Thoracic and lumbar spine injuries such as burst, compression or dislocation fractures as well as soft tissue injuries were found to occur in frontal impacts even without intrusion to the passenger compartment. If a MAIS 2+ injury occurred, in 15% of the cases a thoracic and/or lumbar spine injury is included. Considering AIS 2+ thoracic and lumbar spine, most injuries were fractures and occurred in the lumbar spine area. From the case by case analyses it can be concluded that lumbar spine fractures occur in accidents without the engagement of longitudinals, lateral loading to the occupant and/or very severe accidents with MAIS being much higher than the spine AIS.
Die Zielsetzung der Arbeit bestand darin, Erkenntnisse über das "Dunkelfeld" beziehungsweise die "Unfalldunkelziffer" der amtlichen Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik in Deutschland zu gewinnen. Dazu wurde eine Datenerhebung in einem begrenzten Gebiet durchgeführt. Die Untersuchung sollte Hinweise ermöglichen über die Größe der Unfalldunkelziffer in Abhängigkeit von bestimmten Unfallmerkmalen sowie über die Struktur des Dunkelfeldes im Vergleich zur amtlichen Statistik. Als unterer Grenzwert für die Unfalldunkelziffer in der Pilotstudie wird ein Wert von 44 % angesehen. Die Untersuchung zeigt eine deutliche Abhängigkeit der Dunkelziffer von der Unfallschwere. Die Dunkelziffer liegt geringer bei Unfällen mit "ungeschützten" Unfallobjekten (Unfälle mit Fußgängern und Zweiradfahrern). Der Erfassungsgrad für Nachtunfälle ist größer als für Tagunfälle. Die Untersuchungsergebnisse zeigen insgesamt, dass die Struktur der amtlichen Statistik deutlich von der Struktur des Dunkelfeldes abweicht. Es wird die begründete Annahme ausgesprochen, dass die amtliche Verkehrsunfallstatistik unvollständig ist, wobei der Erfassungsgrad nicht einheitlich ist, sondern von verschiedenen Merkmalen (Unfallschwere, Unfallart, etc.) abhängt.
Aus der Gegenüberstellung der in England und in Deutschland ermittelten Kenngrößen konnten Vermutungen beziehungsweise Tendenzen bezüglich der Verhaltensweisen abgeleitet werden. Die durch die ermittelten Daten fundierten Aussagen lassen sich wie folgt zusammenfassen: - Die deutschen Fahrer nutzen im Mittel kleinere Zeitlücken beziehungsweise Zeitdifferenzen zum Einfahren in den Hauptstrom als die englischen Fahrer, weshalb ein riskanteres Verhalten vermutet werden kann. - Auf deutschen Landstraßen scheint schneller gefahren zu werden als auf englischen Landstraßen. - Die deutschen Fahrer nähern sich im Nebenstrom dem Knoten mit höherer Geschwindigkeit als die englischen Fahrer, was ebenfalls auf eine größere Risikobereitschaft oder sogar größere Aggressivität schließen läßt. Bezüglich des Unfallgeschehens lässt sich daher vermuten, dass in Deutschland durch riskanteres Einfahren in die Hauptstraße die Unfallzahl, und durch höhere Geschwindigkeiten die Unfallschwere erhöht werden. Es lässt sich weiter vermuten, dass die englische Fahrweise, da sich die Fahrer langsamer der Einmündung nähern, defensiver ist, woraus sich günstige Auswirkungen auf das Unfallgeschehen ergeben. In dieser Studie wurden am Beispiel der Einmündung die Probleme solcher Messungen und Vergleiche aufgezeigt und versucht, die Risikoakzeptanz messtechnisch zu quantifizieren; anhand der Ergebnisse konnte dabei generell ein etwas riskanteres Verhalten der deutschen Fahrer festgestellt werden. Die Aussagen beziehen sich dabei natürlich zunächst nur auf die den Messungen zugrundeliegenden Einmündungen. Um allgemeingültige Aussagen zum Verhalten der Verkehrsteilnehmer zu erhalten, bedarf es weiterführender Untersuchungen, in die weitere typische Verkehrssituationen mit entsprechenden Aufgaben für die Verkehrsteilnehmer aufgenommen werden.
Cycling supports the independence and health of the aging population. However, elderly cyclists have an increased injury risk. The majority of injured cyclists is victim of a single-sided accident, an accident in which there is no other party involved. The aim of the project "Safe and Aware on the bicycle" is to develop guidelines for an advisory system that is useful in preventing single-sided accidents. This system is able to support the elderly cyclist; enabling the cyclist to timely adapt his cycling behaviour and improve cycling safety and comfort. For the development of such advisory system the causes of singles accidents and the wishes of the elderly cyclist must be known. First step to obtain this insight was a literature survey and an GIDAS research. Unfortunately accidentology research with GIDAS did not give the full understanding of the pre-crash situations and (especially the behaviour related) factors leading to the accident. The second step was consultation of elderly cyclist through a questionnaire (n=800), in-depth interviews (n=12) and focus group sessions (n=15). This offered complementary information and a much better understanding of the behavioural aspects. Results concern the behaviour in traffic and identify specific physical (i.e. problems looking backwards over the shoulder) and mental issues. Furthermore, the needs and wishes for support in specific cycling situations were identified. In conclusion; The GIDAS results together with the information obtained contacting the elderly cyclists enabled setting up requirements for an advisory system, which is useful in preventing single-sided accidents.
Die flächendeckende Einrichtung von Notarztsystemen ist eine zentrale Aufgabe der jüngsten Ausbaustufe des Rettungswesens. Es ist das Ziel des Forschungsprojekts, die möglichen Organisationsformen von Notarztsystemen aufzuzeigen und die für die Auswahl einer Variante bedeutsamen Planungs- und Entscheidungsfaktoren zu ermitteln und zu systematisieren. Der Gang der Untersuchung gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Aufgabe des ersten Arbeitsschrittes ist es, eine wissenschaftlich abgesicherte Basis zum Planungsproblem der Organisation von Notarztsystemen zu entwickeln. Im Mittelpunkt dieses Untersuchungsabschnitts steht eine sowohl rettungstaktische als auch Kostengesichtspunkte beachtende Analyse der strategischen Organisationsmöglichkeiten von Notarztsystemen. Der zweite Untersuchungsteil ist empirisch ausgelegt. Er hat zur Aufgabe, einen Überblick über die bereits bestehenden Notarztsysteme zu vermitteln und die mit den verschiedenen Ausgestaltungsformen in der Praxis gemachten Erfahrungen aufzuzeigen. Zu diesem Zweck wurden verschiedene Informationsquellen herangezogen. Einerseits wurden die in der Literatur relativ zahlreich vorzufindenden Beschreibungen bereits eingerichteter Notarztsysteme systematisch ausgewertet. Darüber hinaus wurden durch eine Umfrage die in den Bundesländern Saarland und Niedersachsen bestehenden Notarztsysteme flächendeckend erfasst. Die Forschungsergebnisse zeigen, dass die Eignung einer Organisationsform zur Versorgung eines bestimmten Gebietes von einer Vielzahl ortsspezifischer Rahmenbedingungen abhängt und daher keine allgemeingültigen Empfehlungen zur Ausgestaltung von Notarztsystemen ausgesprochen werden können. Allerdings gibt die Untersuchung zu erkennen, dass bei vielen typischen Ausgangslagern ein an ein Krankenhaus angegliedertes, im Rendezvous-Verfahren betriebenes Notarztsystem die günstigste Organisationsvariante darstellt. Zum Abschluss der Untersuchung sind die wichtigsten Planungsempfehlungen zusammengefasst dargelegt. Als gundlegender Punkt wird auf die Notwendigkeit hingewiesen, Notarztsystemen als Teilbereichen des Rettungsdienstes einen rechtlichen und organisatorischen Rahmen zu geben. Wichtig ist dabei zum Beispiel, dass eindeutige Regelungen für die Zuständigkeiten bei der Planung und Durchführung der Dienste getroffen werden.
This study aimed at developing an injury estimation algorithm for AACN technologies for Germany and compared them to findings based on Japanese data. The data to build and to verify the algorithm was obtained from the German in-depth Accident Database (GIDAS) and split into a training and a validation dataset. Significant input variables and the generalized linear regression model to predict severe injuries (ISS>15) were selected to maximize area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Probit regression with the input parameter multiple impact, delta v, seatbelt use and impact direction gave the largest AUC of 0.91. Sensitivity of the algorithm was validated at 90% and specificity at 76% for an injury risk threshold of 2%. It appears that no major differences between Japan and Germany exist for injury estimation based on delta v and impact direction. However, far side impact and multiple crash events appear to be associated with a larger risk increase in the German data.
Pedestrians represent about 20% of the overall fatalities in Europe- road traffic accidents. In this paper a methodology is proposed to understand why the numbers are so high, especially in the south of Europe and particularly in Portugal, . First a detailed statistical analysis using Ordinal Logistic Regression model (OLR) was applied to the gathered data from all Portuguese accidents with victims in the period 2010-2012. In a second stage accident reconstruction computational techniques using pedestrian biomechanical models are used to evaluate the accident conditions that lead to the injuries, such as the speed and the impact location. For biomechanical injury criterions, the AIS (Abbreviated Injury Scale), the HIC (Head Injury Criterion) and other injury criterions based on the resulting accelerations in the pedestrian's body are used. The statistical model reported that there were several predictors that significantly influenced the pedestrian injury severity in the event of a road accident, such as Pedestrian's age, Pedestrian's gender, Vehicle Design/Category or Driver's gender. The use of injury scales and biomechanical criterions in in-depth investigation of road accidents, such as AIS, can significantly improve the quality of the reconstruction process.
Today's volumes of traffic require more and more responsibility from each individual road user in their interactions. Those who drive motor vehicles have the singular obligation to minimise the risk of accidents and hence the severity of injuries, particularly with a view to the most vulnerable road users such as motor bikes, bikes and pedestrians. Since responsible and pro-active driving depends first and foremost on the visual information relayed by our eyes and the visual channel this requires good command of the traffic and all-round visibility from our driver's seat. Granted that human error can never be fully excluded, improving visibility around the car is nevertheless an urgent priority. To do so, we need to rate visibility in the most realistic driving situations. Since the existing visibility metrics and methodology are not applicable to real-life driving situations, this study aimed at developing a new visibility rating methodology based on real-life accident scenarios. On the basis of the cases documented by the accident research project, this study analysed criteria indicative of diminishing visibility on the one hand and revealing some peculiarities in connection with the visibility issue on the other. Based on the above, the project set out to develop a rating methodology allowing to assess all-round visibility in various road situations taking into account both driver and road geometries. In this context, the assessment of visibility while turning a corner, crossing an intersection and joining traffic on a major road (priority through route) is of major importance. The first tests have shown that critical situations can be avoided by adapting the relevant geometries and technical solutions and that significant improvements of road safety can be derived therefrom.