Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (1366)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (637)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (544)
- Bericht (83)
- Arbeitspapier (53)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (40)
- Sonstiges (25)
Sprache
- Deutsch (2263)
- Englisch (482)
- Mehrsprachig (3)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (1083)
- Germany (1079)
- Forschungsbericht (724)
- Research report (704)
- Safety (514)
- Sicherheit (514)
- Unfall (444)
- Accident (434)
- Bewertung (423)
- Conference (413)
Institut
- Sonstige (1197)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (425)
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (396)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (268)
- Abteilung Straßenbautechnik (268)
- Abteilung Brücken- und Ingenieurbau (231)
- Stabstelle Presse und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (24)
- Präsident (11)
- Zentralabteilung (8)
- Stabstelle Forschungscontrolling, Qualitätsmanagement (2)
Das in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten zu beobachtende und auch für die Zukunft anzunehmende Wachstum der Gütertransportleistung auf den Bundesfernstraßen sowie die allmähliche Einführung von Funktionsbauverträgen, die dem ausführenden Bauunternehmen die Verantwortung für sein Bauwerk über Jahrzehnte in die Hand geben, lässt die Frage nach der Nutzungsdauer von Straßenbefestigungen zunehmend in den Vordergrund treten. Für die Oberbauweisen aus Asphalt werden zur Ermittlung eines Substanzwertes, auf dessen Basis gleichfalls eine Bemessung wie auch eine Restwertbestimmung durchführbar sein soll, zum einen analytische Berechnungsverfahren, zum anderen Verfahren, in denen Ergebnisse aus Ermüdungsversuchen vergleichend bewertet werden, verfolgt. Letzteres Verfahren, das vorrangig für die Bestimmung der Restsubstanz einer bereits langjährig unter Verkehr liegenden Asphaltbefestigung angewendet werden soll, wird im Folgenden vorgestellt.
Die Ermittlung einer voraussichtlichen Restnutzungsdauer von Verkehrsbefestigungen und somit der Abschätzung des Eingreifzeitpunktes für eine grundhafte Erneuerung ist ohne die Kenntnis der strukturellen Substanz nur sehr unzureichend zu bewerkstelligen. Mit Vorliegen des Entwurfes zu den "Richtlinien zur Bewertung der strukturellen Substanz des Oberbaus von Verkehrsflächen in Asphaltbauweise" (RSO Asphalt) ist zwar ein hierfür nutzbares Verfahren verfügbar, allerdings basiert dieses auf der Analyse von Laborversuchen an den aus Streckenabschnitten zu entnehmenden Bohrkernen, wodurch eine netzweite Anwendung nicht praktikabel ist. Um trotzdem einen umfassenden Einsatz zu ermöglichen und eine deutliche Verbesserung gegenüber bisherigen Verfahren herbeizuführen, können aber begründete Annahmen zu den Materialkennwerten getroffen werden. Alle weiteren Eingangsdaten des Verfahrens decken sich mit denen des bisherigen. Deren Vollständigkeit und Plausibilität muss zukünftig mehr Bedeutung zugemessen werden.
Der Autor beleuchtet die aktuelle Situation am Arbeitsmarkt und die universitäre Ausbildung. Zum einen stehen, da 45% der Bauingenieure älter als 50 Jahre sind, Unternehmen und der öffentliche Dienst im Wettbewerb um gut ausgebildete Absolventen. Zum anderen müssen Ausbildungsinhalte und der Ausbildungsstandard (Bachelor/Master) Schritt halten mit den anspruchsvoller werdenden Tätigkeiten. Erfordernisse, um die Attraktivität des Berufs des Straßenbauingenieurs zu verdeutlichen, werden aufgezeigt.
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection of passenger cars are in place for many years within world-wide regulations as well as consumer test programmes. Nevertheless, recent accident investigations show a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads alongside increasing injury severities for older road users. The EU-funded SENIORS (Safety ENhancing Innovations for Older Road userS) project developed and evaluated a thorax injury prediction tool (TIPT) for later incorporation within test and assessment procedures. Accident data indicates an increasing portion of AIS2 and AIS3+ thoracic injuries of older pedestrians and cyclists which are currently not assessed in any test procedure for vulnerable road users. Therefore, SENIORS focused on the development of a test tool predicting the risk of rib fractures of vulnerable road users (VRU). While injury risk functions were reanalyzed, human body model (HBM) simulations against categorized generic vehicle frontends served as input for the definition of test setups and corresponding impact parameters. TIPT component tests against a generic frontend and an actual vehicle were used for the evaluation of the technical feasibility. The TIPT component tests shows the general feasibility of a test procedure for the assessment of thoracic injuries, with good repeatability and reproducibility of kinematics and results. Impact parameters such as the inclination angles of the thorax, angles of the velocity vector and impact speeds well replicate the parameters gained from the HBM simulations. The proposed markup and assessment scheme offers the possibility of a homogeneous evaluation of the protection potential of vehicle frontends while maintaining justifiable testing efforts. During evaluation testing, the proposed requirements were entirely met. The developed prototype of TIPT and launching system offer impact angles and speeds as suggested by HBM simulations. However, since thorax impacts during pedestrian accidents do not occur perpendicularly to the vehicle surface in most cases, the TIPT built-in linear potentiometers do not acquire the true resultant intrusions on the ribcage and thus, TIPT rib deflections do not reflect the actual human injury risk. However; for the impact forward to the bonnet leading edge, the TIPT seems applicable without further modifications. The test and assessment procedures using the TIPT offer for the first time the possibility of replicating the kinematics of a pedestrian thorax with a component test. The developed assessment scheme gives a first indication on how the risk for thoracic injuries could be implemented within the Euro NCAP Box 3 assessment. Future development of the TIPT may focus on implementing a rib cage that can deflect in all axes in a humanlike way.
Since the beginning of the testing activities related to passive pedestrian safety, the width of the test area being assessed regarding its protection level for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users has been determined by geometrical measurements at the outer contour of the vehicle. During the past years, the trend of a decreased width of the lower extremity test and assessment area realized by special features of the outer vehicle frontend design could be observed. This study discusses different possibilities for counteracting this development and thus finding a robust definition for this area including all structures with high injury risk for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users in the event of a collision with a motor vehicle. While Euro NCAP is addressing the described problem by defining a test area under consideration of the stiff structures underneath the bumper fascia, a detailed study was carried out on behalf of the European Commission, aiming at a robust, worldwide harmonized definition of the bumper test area for legislation, taking into account the specific requirements of different certification procedures of the contracting parties of the UN/ECE agreements from 1958 and 1998. This paper details the work undertaken by BASt, also serving as a contribution to the TF-BTA of the UN/ECE GRSP, towards a harmonized test area in order to better protect the lower extremities of vulnerable road users. The German In-Depth Accident Database GIDAS is studied with respect to the potential benefit of a revised test area. Several practical options are discussed and applied to actual vehicles, investigating the differences and possible effects. Tests are carried out and the results studied in detail. Finally, a proposal for a feasible definition is given and a suggestion is made for solving possible open issues at angled surfaces due to rotation of the impactor. The study shows that, in principle, there is a need for the entire vehicle width being assessed with regard to the protection potential for lower extremities of vulnerable road users. It gives evidence on the necessity for a robust definition of the lower extremity test area including stiff and thus injurious structures at the vehicle frontend, especially underneath the bumper fascia. The legal definition of the lower extremity test area will shortly be almost harmonized with the robust Euro NCAP requirements, as already endorsed by GRSP, taking into account injurious structures and thus contributing to the enhanced protection of vulnerable road users. After finalization of the development of a torso mass for the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) it is recommended to consider again the additional benefit of assessing the entire vehicle width.
A biofidelic flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been developed from the year 2000 onwards and evaluated by a technical evaluation group (Flex-TEG) of UN-ECE GRSP. A recently established UN-ECE GRSP Informal Group on GTR9 Phase 2 is aiming at introducing the FlexPLI within world-wide regulations on pedestrian safety (Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 as well as the new UN regulation 127 on pedestrian safety) as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents. Besides, the FlexPLI has already been introduced within JNCAP and is on the Euro NCAP roadmap for 2014. Despite of the biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia sections, several open issues related to the FlexPLI, like the estimation of the cost benefit, the feasibility of vehicle compliance with the threshold values, the robustness of the impactor and of the test results, the comparability between prototype and production level and the finalization of certification corridors still needed to be solved. Furthermore, discussions with stakeholders about a harmonized lower legform to bumper test area are still going on. This paper describes several studies carried out by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) regarding the benefit due to the introduction of the FlexPLI within legislation for type approval, the robustness of test results, the establishment of new assembly certification corridors and a proposal for a harmonized legform to bumper test area. Furthermore, a report on vehicle tests that previously had been carried out with three prototype legforms and were now being repeated using legforms with serial production status, is given. Finally, the paper gives a status report on the ongoing simulation and testing activities with respect to the development and evaluation of an improved test procedure with upper body mass for assessing pedestrian femur injuries.