Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis <Tokyo>rnAbstract: Analyses were conducted to clarify the features of rear-end collisions, using an integrated accident database developed by the Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis (ITARDA). Focusing on neck injuries in rear-end collisions, analyses were made of the relation to struck-vehicle properties. Regarding the relation to the initial year of registration, the results did not show that newer vehicles tended to have a lower no-neck-injury rate, which was defined in this study as an index. On the contrary, in some passenger car classes, it was observed that the no-neck-injury rate was higher in newer vehicles. The effect of an active head restraint system, which is one type of anti-whiplash device, was analyzed by using not only the no-neck-injury rate but also a regression analysis. The results showed that the effect of an active head restraint system on suppressing the incidence of neck injuries was statistically significant.rn
Rear-end collisions are the most frequent same and opposite-direction crashes. Common causes include momentary inattention, inadequate speed or inadequate distance. While most rear-end collisions in urban traffic only result in vehicle damage or slight injuries, rear-end collisions outside built-up areas or on motorways usually cause fatal or serious injuries. Driver assistance systems that detect dangerous situations in the longitudinal vehicle direction are therefore an essential safety plus. In view of this, for ADAC, systems that alert drivers to dangerous situations and initiate autonomous braking complement ESC as one of the most important active safety features in modern vehicles. The aim of ADAC is to provide consumers with technical advice and competent information about the systems available on the market. Reliable comparative tests that are based on standardised test criteria may provide motorists with important information and help them make a buying decision. In addition, they raise consumer awareness of the systems and speed up their market penetration. The assessment must focus on as many aspects of effectiveness as possible and include not only autonomous braking but also collision warning and autonomous brake assist. The work of the ADAC accident research is the development of the testing scenarios with direct link to accident situations and the identification of useful test criteria for testing.
Event Data Recorder (EDR) is an additional function installed in airbag control module (ACM) to record vehicle and occupant information for a brief period of time before, during, and after a crash event. EDRs are now being installed in ACMs by several automakers in the USA and in Japan. The aim of this study is to understand the performance of EDRs for the improvement of accident reconstruction with more reliable information. In the first report of the study, data obtained from EDRs of seven vehicle types were evaluated using 2006-2007 J-NCAP (Japanese new car assessment program) full-lap frontal barrier crash tests and offset frontal deformable barrier crash tests data. For more practical standpoint, we conducted thirteen crash tests reconstructing typical real-world accidents such as single vehicle accidents with barriers or poles, car to car accidents and multi rear-end collisions focusing on Japanese typical accident types. Data obtained from EDRs are compared with data obtained from optical speed sensor, instrumented accelerometers and high speed video cameras. The velocities determined from pre-crash data of EDRs and the maximum change in velocity, delta-V, and delta-V time history data obtained from post-crash data of EDRs are analyzed. The results are as follows: - Pre-crash velocities of EDRs were very accurate and reliable. An average difference between the EDR recording values and reference speeds was 4.2% and a root mean square of the differences was 9.2%. Only two cases resulted large differences for the pre-crash velocity. Both of them were cases with braking prior to the collision. However, another test with braking resulted less difference. The braking condition may influence accuracy of pre-crash velocities. - Maximum delta-Vs obtained from the EDRs showed uncertainty of measurement in several cases in comparisons with the reliable delta-V data. The differences in maximum delta-V were more than 10% in five of twenty-five events data and more than 20% in two of twenty-five events data. An average of the all differences was about 4% and root mean square of the differences was about 11%. Especially large deformation at narrow area may influence accuracy of post-crash delta-V. - Multiple rear-end crash tests were reconstructed using EDRs data as case studies. Some EDRs recorded two events and a time gap between two events, so that these reconstruction case studies were very accurate and reliable. - If though only one of three vehicles in multiple rear end crash was equipped EDR, overview and velocities of all cars may be reconstructed using these limited EDR data. In this case study, leading car- EDR data and middle car- EDR data were valuable. However if only following car was equipped EDR, the reconstruction was not accurate
Euro NCAP will start to test pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEB) from 2016 on. Test procedures for these tests had been developed by and discussed between the AsPeCSS project and other initiatives (e.g. the AEB group with Thatcham Research from the UK). This paper gives an overview on the development process from the AsPeCSS side, summarizes the current test and assessment procedures as of March 2015 and shows test and assessment results of five cars that had been tested by BASt for AsPeCSS and the respective manufacturer. The test and assessment methodology seems appropriate to rate the performance of different vehicles. The best test result - still one year ahead of the test implementation - is around 80%, while the worst rating result is around 10%. Other vehicles are between these boundaries.
Methods for analyzing the efficiency of primary safety measures based on real life accident data
(2009)
Primary safety measures are designed to help to avoid accidents or, if this is not possible, to stabilize respectively reduce the dynamics of the vehicle to such an extent that the secondary safety measures are able to act as good as possible. The efficiency of a primary safety measure is a criterion for the effectiveness, with which a system of primary safety succeeds in avoiding or mitigation the severity of accidents within its range of operation and in interactionwith driver and vehicle. Based on Daimler-´s philosophy of the "Real Life Safety" the reflection of the real world accidents in the systems range of operation is both starting point as well as benchmark for its optimization. This paper deals with the methodology to perform assessments of statistical representative efficiency of primary safety measures. To be able to carry out an investigation concerning the efficiency of a primary safety measure in a transparent and comparable way basic definitions and systematics were introduced. Based on these definitions different systematic methods for estimating efficiency were discussed and related to each other. The paper is completed by presenting an example for estimating the efficiency of actual "single" and "multi" connected primary safety systems.
Mit der vorliegenden Untersuchung knüpft die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen an die letzte Untersuchung zum Unfallgeschehen von Wohnmobilen aus dem Jahr 1999 an. Neben der Entwicklung der Anzahl der Unfälle von Wohnmobilen im Zeitraum 2000 bis 2010 wird die Struktur der Unfälle beleuchtet. Auch die charakteristischen Merkmale der beteiligten Fahrer der Wohnmobile und einige technische Merkmale wie z.B. die Motorisierung und das zulässige Gesamtgewicht werden untersucht. Weiterhin wird die im Unfallgeschehen kleine Gruppe der Pkw mit Wohnanhänger soweit möglich in die Untersuchung einbezogen. Diese beiden Gruppen werden der Gesamtgruppe der Pkw-Unfälle vergleichend gegenübergestellt. Wohnmobile werden in der amtlichen Unfallstatistik nicht explizit codiert. Somit sind -im Rahmen der regelmäßigen Veröffentlichungen des Statistischen Bundesamtes -keine Informationen zum Unfallgeschehen von Wohnmobilen verfügbar. Dennoch ist es möglich, über die vom Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt ergänzten fahrzeugtechnischen Angaben zum Kraftfahrzeug, deutsche Wohnmobile zu identifizieren und mit der vollen Merkmalsbreite des amtlichen Datenmaterials auszuwerten. Mit einem Anteil von weniger als 0,3% an allen Unfällen mit Personenschaden stellen Unfälle unter Beteiligung von Wohnmobilen keinen Schwerpunkt im Unfallgeschehen dar. Im Jahr 2010 wurden 743 Unfälle mit Personenschaden registriert, an denen ein Wohnmobil beteiligt war. Die Entwicklung der Unfallbeteiligung stellt sich im Zeitraum 2000 bis 2010 mit einem Rückgang von 36% bei den Unfällen mit Personenschaden sogar günstiger dar, als die Entwicklung der Unfälle unter Pkw-Beteiligung (-28%). Bei Unfällen unter Beteiligung von Wohnmobilen wurden im Jahr 2010 insgesamt 19 Personen getötet und 202 Personen schwer verletzt. Darunter waren jedoch nur 4 getötete und 62 schwerverletzte Personen Insassen eines Wohnmobils; die übrigen Verunglückten wurden beim Unfallgegner registriert. Gleichwohl zeigt die nach Fahrern und Mitfahrern differenzierte Betrachtung der Unfallschwere bei den Wohnmobilen Ansatzpunkte zur Verbesserung der Sicherheit. Im Mittel des Zeitraumes 2000 bis 2010 weisen die Mitfahrer von Wohnmobilen eine deutlich erhöhte Unfallschwere im Vergleich zu den Fahrern auf. So liegt die Kenngrösse \"Schwere Personenschäden bezogen auf die Fahrer bzw. Mitfahrer\" bei den Mitfahrern bei 51 schweren Personenschäden je 1.000 Mitfahrer und bei den Fahrern bei 34 schweren Personenschäden je 1.000 Fahrer.
Twenty-eight percent of traffic accidents in Japan are rear-end collisions, and of these, 13% are multiple collisions (three or more vehicles and/or roadside objects). A post-crash braking system enables the driver to stop the vehicle in a short distance after a rear-end collision to prevent secondary collisions. In this study, the effectiveness of a post-crash braking system was examined using a drive recorder database. In 64% of rear-end collisions, the driver's braking was interrupted after the collision. The stopping distance was estimated with time data from the drive recorder. We predict that the brake assist would be effective in preventing secondary collisions in 21% of cases.
From an automotive safety occupant protection standpoint, effective occupant restraint requires a system capable of providing non-injurious occupant ride down of anticipated crash forces. This is not only the case for frontal collisions, where occupant restraint is provided primarily by seatbelts and airbags, but is also critical for other crash modes such as side impacts, rear impacts, rollovers, as well as multiple impact events. In the rear impact crash mode, occupant restraint is provided primarily by the seatbacks and to some extent the seatbelts. Foundationally, therefore, what becomes fundamental to the seatback's role in rear occupant protection is its ability to contain the occupant within the seat, preventing occupant ramping, as well as preventing the seat's, and/or its occupant's, dangerous intrusion into the rear occupant's survival space where contact with rear compartment components and/ or rear seated occupants can present a significant injury risk. An analysis is presented of a series of rear impact sled testing conducted by the authors that evaluates the timing, position and extent of the front seatback's reward displacement toward and into the rear occupant compartment as well as consideration of the front seat occupant' ramping potential and its injury potential relative to the rear compartment. Additionally, three other series of testing are presented which assess various seat designs occupant retention capabilities. Lastly, a matched-pair comparison test series is presented which evaluates occupant motion in rear impact with and without use of a typical vehicle body mounted 3-point seatbelt. Discussion of restraint system performance observed in all the testing is included along with ATD biofidelity and thigh-gap considerations. The data collected and presented includes accelerometer instrumentation and high speed video analysis.
Erkenntnisse über den Nutzen zusätzlicher hochgesetzter Bremsleuchten sind lückenhaft und zum Teil widersprüchlich. Im Rahmen einer Untersuchung über den Einfluss zusätzlicher Bremsleuchten auf das Unfallgeschehen wurden u.a. folgende Fragen behandelt: 1. Entwicklung der Unfälle durch Auffahren auf Fahrzeuge, die mit zusätzlichen Bremsleuchten ausgerüstet sind, 2. Entwicklung der Auffahrunfälle insgesamt, 3. Verletzungen von Fahrzeuginsassen durch Leuchten, 4. Auswirkungen auf die übrigen Verkehrsteilnehmer (Abstand, Blendung, Fehlreaktion). Anhand konkreter Daten über das Unfallgeschehen in Bayern und Niedersachsen kommt der Beitrag insgesamt zu dem Urteil, dass die derzeitige Regelung weder durch eine Einbauvorschrift noch durch ein Einbauverbot hochgesetzter Bremsleuchten ersetzt werden müsste.
Im Rahmen eines Pilotversuches wurden auf der A 24 (Hamburg-Berlin) zwischen den Anschlussstellen Herzsprung und Fehrbellin Rüttelstreifen in den Seitenstreifen eingefräst. Hintergrund der Maßnahme war die Erprobung von Rüttelstreifen zur Senkung der Unfallzahlen auf diesem 35,9 km langen Streckenabschnitt, insbesondere der ermüdungsbedingten Unfälle mit Abkommen von der Fahrbahn. Die durchgeführte Unfallanalyse konnte zeigen, dass die Unfallzahlen innerhalb des Untersuchungszeitraumes (2000-2006) deutlich zurückgegangen sind. Aufgrund der Tatsache, dass während des Untersuchungszeitraumes mehrere Maßnahmen umgesetzt wurden, konnte die Reduktion jedoch nicht eindeutig den Rüttelstreifen zugeordnet werden. Um dennoch die Wirksamkeit der Rüttelstreifen zu beurteilen, wurde ein Vorher-Nachher-Vergleich mit Kontrollstrecke (86,7 km) durchgeführt. Im Ergebnis konnte nachgewiesen werden, dass Rüttelstreifen die Schwere der Unfälle positiv beeinflussen jedoch nur einen kleinen Einfluss auf die Unfallzahlen haben. Statistisch gesicherte Ergebnisse konnten nur für zwei Unfallmerkmale ermittelt werden. Danach nahmen die Anzahl der Unfälle der Unfallart "Abkommen von der Fahrbahn nach rechts" um 43% sowie die Anzahl von Unfällen infolge der Unfallursache "Andere Fehler" (i.d.R. Unaufmerksamkeit) um 34% ab. Bei der Bestimmung des Nutzen-Kosten-Verhältnisses (NKV) konnte festgestellt werden, dass die Kosten der Maßnahme relativ gering sind, der Nutzen dagegen vor allen durch die eingesparten Unfallkosten sehr hoch sind. Für einen Abschreibungszeitraum von 12,5 Jahren (Asphaltdeckschicht) und unter Annahme eines konstanten Nutzenverlaufes ergab sich ein NKV von 46. Aufgrund des hohen NKV wird der Einsatz von eingefrästen Rüttelstreifen auf Autobahnen empfohlen, insbesondere auf Streckenabschnitten, an denen die beiden oben genannten Unfallmerkmale überdurchschnittlich häufig vorkommen.