Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Conference (329) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (329) (entfernen)
HORN stellt in ihrem Eingangsreferat den "Neuen Bundesverkehrswegeplan und die SUP in der Verkehrswegeplanung" vor. Das zentrale Element des in der Regel auf 10 bis 15 Jahre angelegten Plans ist die aus europäischen Vorgaben abgeleitete Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung. Diese erfordert bei der Erstellung des Bundesverkehrswegeplans einen kontinuierlichen Kommunikationsprozess. Zugleich betonte HORN die starke Unterfinanzierung des aktuellen Plans. Der Erhaltung der vorhandenen Verkehrsinfrastruktur komme in den Bereichen Straße, Schiene und Wasser der Vorrang vor Neubauten zu. FEHLING plädiert in seinem Beitrag "Die Straße im Kontext des öffentlichen Personennahverkehrs" für eine nahverkehrsfreundliche Planung und Gestaltung des Straßenraums. Die Planungen verschiedener Verkehrsträger und Planungsebenen müssten aufeinander aber auch mit straßenverkehrsrechtlichen Anordnungen abgestimmt werden. Die entsprechende Koordination sei allerdings verbesserungsbedürftig. Namentlich die Vernetzung der Nahverkehrsplanung mit anderen Planungsebenen müsse ausgebaut werden. KUGELE berichtet in seinem Beitrag "Selbstfinanzierte Straßen" für eine längerfristige Verlässlichkeit der Verkehrsfinanzierung. Gegenwärtig fließe nur etwa die Hälfte der Abgaben aus dem Verkehr dem Gesamtverkehrssystem auch wieder zu. Diese Mittel müssten gesteigert und längerfristig für den Verkehr verfügbar gemacht werden, etwa durch längerfristige Leistungs- und Finanzierungsvereinbarungen oder durch Sondervermögen. Der abschließende Beitrag "Das neue Vergaberecht" von SIEGEL behandelt drei neue EU-Vergaberichtlinien, die am 17.04.2014 in Kraft getreten und nun binnen zweier Jahre umzusetzen sind. Nach dem neuen Recht können künftig ökologische und soziale Kriterien verstärkt eine Rolle bei der Vergabe von öffentlichen Aufträgen spielen. Diese neuen Richtlinien vergrößern indes die Nachweispflichten und den bürokratischen Aufwand. Neben das Kriterium des "wirtschaftlich günstigsten Angebots" zählt zudem nunmehr auch das beste Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis.
S. RINKE referiert über das Infrastrukturplanungsbeschleunigungsgesetz. Es trat am 17.12.2006 in Kraft und hat einheitlich für die gesamte Bundesrepublik Deutschland ein vereinfachtes Planungsrecht für Projekte im Bereich von Bundesfernstraßen, Eisenbahn-Infrastrukturanlagen, Bundeswasserstraßen, Flughäfen, Strom- und Gasversorgungsleitungen geschaffen. Das nunmehrige rechtliche Planungsinstrumentarium soll es ermöglichen, dass die Zulassungsverfahren eine Beschleunigung um bis zu 21/2 Jahre erfahren. Der Referent erläutert die wichtigsten Änderungen durch dieses Gesetz, würdigt die Rollen der beteiligten gesetzgebenden Organe und gibt einen Ausblick auf die Ergebnisse einer Bund-Länder-Arbeitsgruppe zur Angleichung der Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetze von Bund und Ländern an dieses Gesetz. Auch KERN beschäftigt sich mit der Tatsache, dass Zulassungsverfahren für Infrastrukturvorhaben und etwaige mit der Zulassungsentscheidung verbundene gerichtliche Verfahren oft unangemessen lange dauern. Dies gilt insbesondere für den Verkehrsbereich. Er erläutert in seinem Referat die Tendenzen zur weiteren Planungsbeschleunigung, wobei er auch von seinen Erfahrungen über die Entwicklung dieses Bereiches während der letzten beiden Jahrzehnte berichtet, sowohl auf Bundesebene als auch in einzelnen Bundesländern. Das Ende 2006 in Kraft getretene Infrastrukturplanungsbeschleunigungsgesetz überlässt es bewusst den Landesgesetzgebern, zahlreiche offene Regelungen zu füllen , in dem Gesetz sind damit die entsprechenden Vorschläge des Bundesrates berücksichtigt worden. Abschließend stellt der Autor weitere Überlegungen zu einer möglichen Planungsbeschleunigung vor und endet mit einem kritischen Ausblick. KERN geht davon aus, dass die neuesten Beschleunigungsvorschläge den zeitlichen Ablauf von Zulassungsverfahren weiter deutlich straffen werden. G. GEYER (Vortrag durch MAß) referiert im um-fangreichsten Beitrag des Forschungsseminares über "50 Jahre Länderfachausschuss Straßenbaurecht " 50 Jahre gelebter Förderalismus in der Auftragsverwaltung für Bundesfernstraßen". Der Länderfachausschuss Straßenbaurecht ist ein Ländergremium, in dem juristische Vertreter der Straßenbauverwaltungen der Länder und des Bundesverkehrsministeriums in Fragen des Straßenbaurechts unter dem Blick der Bundesauftragsverwaltung mit dem Ziel einheitlicher Lösungen bis zu seiner Auflösung zum 1. Januar 2005 eng zusammengearbeitet haben. Anhand historischer Dokumente gibt der Referent Einblicke in die zurückliegende Arbeit des Ausschusses seit seiner offiziellen Gründung im Mai 1957. Über seine Entstehungsgeschichte, seine Aufgaben und Tätigkeiten und seine Organisation hinaus gibt der Autor verfassungsrechtliche Bewertungen von Regelungen und der Zulässigkeit von allgemeinen Weisungen und beleuchtet die künftige Arbeit der Nachfolgeinstitution des Länderfachausschusses, der "Dienstbesprechung Straßenbaurecht" unter der Leitung eines Vertreters des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, deren Schwerpunkt er mit "Europa und kein Ende" überschreibt. Gegenstand des Beitrages von Ch. HEITSCH zur Situation der Fernstraßenplanung nach der Föderalismusreform ist deren Auswirkungen auf die Rechtsgebiete, die für die Planung der Bundesfernstraßen bedeutsam sind. Neben dem Fernstraßenrecht zählen dazu auch das Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht, das Naturschutz- und das Raumordnungsrecht. Der Autor weist bereits einleitend auf das Paradoxon der Föderalismusreform hin, dass straßenrechtliche Gesetzgebungskompetenzen des Bundes weiterhin der Erforderlichkeitsklausel des durch die Föderalismusreform geänderten Artikels 72 des Grundgesetzes unterliegen , diese Klausel wird vom Bundesverfassungsgericht äußerst restriktiv ausgelegt. Am Beispiel des Infrastrukturplanungsbeschleunigungsgesetzes macht der Verfasser deutlich, welche Konsequenzen die fortdauernde Bindung der fernstraßenrechtlichen Gesetzgebungskompetenzen an die Erforderlichkeitsklausel haben könnte. HEITSCH stellt schwerpunktmäßig die unterschiedlichen Gesetzgebungszuständigkeiten in den einzelnen Bereichen dar und erläutert die Probleme, die sich aus konkurrierenden Kompetenzen zur Gesetzgebung ergeben.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and accuracy of Event Data Recorders (EDRs). The analysis was based on J-NCAP crash tests from 2006"2007, with the corresponding EDR datasets. The pre-crash velocity, maximum delta-V and delta-V versus time history data recorded in the EDRs were compared with the reliable crash test data. The difference between the EDR pre-crash velocity and the laboratory test speed was less than 4 percent. In contrast, in several cases the maximum delta-V and delta-V versus time history data obtained from the EDRs showed uncertainty of measurement in comparisons with the reliable delta-V data. The difference in maximum delta-V in these comparisons was more than 5 percent in 10 of 14 tests and more than 10 percent in 4 of 14 tests. The EDRs underestimated the maximum delta-V in almost all tests. It was also concluded that the calculated acceleration from the EDR delta-V versus time history data showed good agreement with the instrumented accelerometer signal during the collision in almost all tests.
Since 2008, the authors inspected fatal traffic accidents on the spot every year, with the cooperation of Toyota police station in Aichi pref. In the jurisdiction, numbers of fatal accidents were 18 in 2008, 12 in 2009, 14 accidents in 2010, and 16 in 2011. We here report the results of our analysis of information obtained by detailed inspection for those that occurred from 2008 to 2010. We focused on vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents, which accounted for about 45% of all accidents in 2008. Because many accidents occurred on residential roads not far from pedestrians" homes, it was revealed that the decrease of the collision speed by traffic calming such as humps and zone speed management, was highly effective. On the other hand, pedestrian detection technologies seemed to be also effective as a countermeasure on vehicle side. Every pedestrian position against a vehicle was clarified and TTC (Time to Collision) was calculated provisionally. Pedestrian accidents in intersections were also examined. Among the intersection pedestrian accidents within the jurisdiction, compared with the national average in Japan, the ratio of intersections without a signal and the ratio without a pedestrian crossing were high. According to the comparison of the Japanese traffic accident patterns between 2001 and 2008, pedestrian accidents during turning right and turning left did not decrease much. For elderly drivers, these accidents occurred very often. Finally, single vehicle accidents were analysed with the accident pattern analysis methods used above. There were high numbers of single vehicle accidents against object on single roads. Although fatal accidents against guardrails decreased, the numbers of fatal accidents against a utility pole and a sign pole were nearly constant. As for the impact with narrow width objects such as utility poles, the fatality rate was very high, and countermeasures of both road infrastructure and vehicles seem to be effective.
The "Seven Steps Method" is an analysis and classification system, which describes the human participation factors and their causes in the temporal sequence (from the perceptibility to concrete action errors) taking into consideration the logical sequence of individual basic functions. By means of the "seven steps" it is possible to describe the relevant human causes of accidents from persons involved in the accident in an economic way with a sufficient degree of exactitude, because the causes can be further differentiated in their value (e.g. diversion as external diversion with regard to impact due to surroundings) and their sub values (e.g. external diversion with regard to impact due to surroundings in the shape of a "capture" of the perception by a prominent object of the traffic environment). Theoretically it is possible that one or more causing moments can be assigned to a person involved in an accident in each of the "seven steps"; however it is also possible to sufficiently clarify the cause in only one level (examples for this are described). In the practice of accident investigation at the site of the accident, the sequence chart is also relevant. With its assistance the questioning of the people involved in an accident can be accomplished in a structured way by assigning a set of questions to each step.
Impact severity is a fundamental measure for all in-depth crash investigation projects. One methodology used in the UK is based on the US Calspan software package CRASH3. The UK- in-depth crash investigation studies routinely use AiDamage3 a software package which is based on an updated version of the original CRASH3 algorithm, including enhancements to the vehicle stiffness coefficients. Real world accident-damaged vehicles are measured and their crush is correlated with a library of stiffness coefficients. These measurements are then used, along with other parameters, to calculate the crash energy and equivalent changes of velocity of the vehicles (delta-v), which is a measure of the impact severity. UK in-depth accident studies routinely validate the crash severity methodologies applied as the vehicle fleet changes. This is achieved by analysing crash test data and using the appropriate residual crush damage and other inputs to AiDamage3 and checking the program- outputs with the known crash severity parameters. This procedure checks, at least in part, the default stiffness values in the data libraries and the reconstruction methods used.
Small overlap frontal crashes are defined by a damage pattern with most of the vehicle deformation concentrated outboard of the main longitudinal structures. These crashes are prominent among frontal crashes resulting in serious and fatal injuries, even among vehicles that perform well in regulatory and consumer information crash tests. One of the critical aspects of understanding these crashes is knowing the crash speeds that cause the types of damage associated with serious injuries. Laboratory crash tests were conducted using 12 vehicles in three small overlap test conditions: pole, vehicle-to-vehicle collinear, and vehicle-to-vehicle oblique (15-degree striking angle). Field reconstruction techniques were used to estimate the delta V for each vehicle, and these results were compared with actual delta V values based on vehicle accelerometer data. Estimated delta Vs were 50% lower than actual values. Velocity change estimates for small overlap frontal crashes in databases such as NASS-CDS significantly underestimate actual values.
Rear-end collisions are the most frequent same and opposite-direction crashes. Common causes include momentary inattention, inadequate speed or inadequate distance. While most rear-end collisions in urban traffic only result in vehicle damage or slight injuries, rear-end collisions outside built-up areas or on motorways usually cause fatal or serious injuries. Driver assistance systems that detect dangerous situations in the longitudinal vehicle direction are therefore an essential safety plus. In view of this, for ADAC, systems that alert drivers to dangerous situations and initiate autonomous braking complement ESC as one of the most important active safety features in modern vehicles. The aim of ADAC is to provide consumers with technical advice and competent information about the systems available on the market. Reliable comparative tests that are based on standardised test criteria may provide motorists with important information and help them make a buying decision. In addition, they raise consumer awareness of the systems and speed up their market penetration. The assessment must focus on as many aspects of effectiveness as possible and include not only autonomous braking but also collision warning and autonomous brake assist. The work of the ADAC accident research is the development of the testing scenarios with direct link to accident situations and the identification of useful test criteria for testing.
Bicyclists are minimally or unprotected road users. Their vulnerability results in a high injury risk despite their relatively low own speed. However, the actual injury situation of bicyclists has not been investigated very well so far. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual injury situation of bicyclists in Germany to create a basis for effective preventive measures. Technical and medical data were prospectively collected shortly after the accident at the accident scenes and medical institutions providing care for the injured. Data of injured bicyclists from 1985 to 2003 were analyzed for the following parameters: collision opponent, collision type, collision speed (km/h), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Maximum AIS (MAIS), incidence of polytrauma (Injury Severity Score >16), incidence of death (death before end of first hospital stay). 4,264 injured bicyclists were included. 55% were male and 45% female. The age was grouped to preschool age in 0.9%, 6 to 12 years in 10.8%, 13 to 17 years in 10.4%, 18 to 64 years in 64.7%, and over 64 years in 13.2%. The MAIS was 1 in 78.8%, 2 in 17.0%, 3 in 3.0%, 4 in 0.6%, 5 in 0.4%, and 6 in 0.2%. The incidence of polytrauma was 0.9%, and the incidence of death was 0.5%. The incidence of injuries to different body regions was as follows: head, 47.8%; neck, 5.2%, thorax, 21%; upper extremities, 46.3%; abdomen, 5.8%; pelvis, 11.5%, lower extremities, 62.1%. The accident location was urban in 95.2%, and rural in 4.8%. The accidents happened during daylight in 82.4%, during night in 12.2%, and during dawn/dusk in 5.3%. The road situation was as follows: straight, 27.3%; bend, 3.0%; junction, 32.0%; crossing, 26.4%; gate, 5.9%; others, 5.4%. The collision opponents were cars in 65.8%, trucks in 7.2%, bicycles in 7.4%, standing objects in 8.8%, multiple objects in 4.3%, and others in 6.5%. The collision speed was grouped <31 in 77.9%, 31-50 in 4.9%, 51-70 in 3.7%, and >70 in 1.5%. The helmet use rate was 1.5%. 68% of the registered head injuries were located in the effective helmet protection area. In bicyclists, head and extremities are at high risk for injuries. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. Remarkably, two thirds of the head injuries could have been prevented by helmets. Accidents are concentrated to crossings, junctions and gates. A significant lower mean injury severity was observed in victims using separate bicycle lanes. These results do strongly support the extension or addition of bicycle lanes and their consequent use. However, the lanes are frequently interrupted at crossings and junctions. This emphasizes also the important endangering of bicyclists coming from crossings, junctions and gates, i.e. all situations in which contact of bicyclists to motorized vehicles is possible. Redesigning junctions and bicycle traffic lanes to minimize the possibility of this dangerous contact would be preventive measures. A more consequent helmet use and use and an extension of bicycle paths for a better separation of bicyclists and motorized vehicle would be simple but very effective preventive measures.
The current Brussels EU Regulation No. 1235/2011, valid from May 30, 2012, has introduced an European Tyre Label with wet grip index G classes from A to G for passenger car tyres C1, light commercial vehicles tyres C2 and heavy truck- and bus tyres C3. Every wet grip class for each vehicle category has a defined band of numerical values for the wet grip index G. The legislated wet grip values G in this EU- Regulation are very low. The measured braking distances and corresponding impact speeds of the test vehicles are showing very critical results. Regulation No. 1235/2011 of the European Parliament and the Council for Type Approval of Vehicles (EU) should be changed in such a way, that for C1-tyres (normal passenger cars tyres) the minimum wet grip index G is 1.25. All C2-tyres (light commercial vehicles tyres) should at least meet a minimum wet grip index of G = 1.1. All C3-tyres (heavy trucks and buses tyres) should at least meet a minimum wet grip index of G = 0.95. Due to the missing lower limits for G in the wet grip class F for C1, C2 and C3 tyres according to Commission Regulation (EU) No. 1235/2011, officially valid from 30 May 2012, a tyre-to-road coefficient of adhesion in the extreme of 0 (zero) is legally permitted. This is an apparent flaw in above cited EU Regulation, which causes a potential danger to the road traffic safety for all motor vehicles in Europe with such tyres. The wet grip class F has to be removed urgently from said EURegulation, since a direct liability of the responsible EU-Commission can not be excluded.