Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (68) (entfernen)
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (68) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (21)
- Konferenz (21)
- Bewertung (19)
- Evaluation (assessment) (19)
- Prüfverfahren (17)
- Test method (17)
- Safety (16)
- Sicherheit (16)
- Accident (14)
- Impact test (veh) (14)
- Unfall (14)
- Anfahrversuch (13)
- Injury (13)
- Verletzung (13)
- Anthropometric dummy (12)
- Dummy (12)
- Fußgänger (11)
- Pedestrian (11)
- Europa (10)
- Europe (10)
- Analyse (math) (9)
- Analysis (math) (9)
- Simulation (9)
- Collision (8)
- Radfahrer (8)
- Biomechanics (7)
- Biomechanik (7)
- Cyclist (7)
- Deutschland (7)
- Driver assistance system (7)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (7)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (7)
- Germany (7)
- Head on collision (7)
- Richtlinien (7)
- Specifications (7)
- Tunnel (7)
- Zusammenstoß (7)
- Child (6)
- Kind (6)
- Passive safety system (6)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (6)
- Severity (accid, injury) (6)
- Verletzung) (6)
- injury) (6)
- Alte Leute (5)
- Car (5)
- Datenbank (5)
- Driver (5)
- Fahrzeug (5)
- Head (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Kopf (5)
- Severity (accid (5)
- Unfallverhütung (5)
- Accident prevention (4)
- Bemessung (4)
- Boden (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Fahrer (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Old people (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Rigid pavement (4)
- Risikobewertung (4)
- Risk assessment (4)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (4)
- Side impact (4)
- Soil (4)
- Standardisierung (4)
- Standardization (4)
- Statistics (4)
- Statistik (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Vehicle (4)
- Active safety system (3)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Belastung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Betonstraße (Oberbau) (3)
- Cement (3)
- Concrete (3)
- Cracking (3)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (3)
- Design (overall design) (3)
- Durability (3)
- Earthworks (3)
- Erdarbeiten (3)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (3)
- Fatality (3)
- Fuge (3)
- Fugenfüllung (3)
- Gesetzgebung (3)
- Improvement (3)
- Insasse (3)
- Interior (veh) (3)
- International (3)
- Joint (structural) (3)
- Lebenszyklus (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Life cycle (3)
- Load (3)
- Measurement (3)
- Messung (3)
- Method (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- On the spot accident investigation (3)
- Pkw (3)
- Research project (3)
- Rissbildung (3)
- Road network (3)
- Straßennetz (3)
- Surfacing (3)
- Transport infrastructure (3)
- Tödlicher Unfall (3)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (3)
- Use (3)
- Vehicle occupant (3)
- Verbesserung (3)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (3)
- Zement (3)
- Abdichtung (2)
- Abdomen (2)
- Accident rate (2)
- Airbag (2)
- Arbeitsgruppe (2)
- Autobahn (2)
- Automatic (2)
- Automatisch (2)
- Autonomes Fahren (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous driving (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Bau (2)
- Beton (2)
- Braking (2)
- Brand (2)
- Bremsung (2)
- CEN (2)
- Cause (2)
- Classification (2)
- Compatibility (2)
- Construction (2)
- Cost benefit analysis (2)
- Data acquisition (2)
- Data bank (2)
- Database (2)
- Datenerfassung (2)
- Decke (Straße) (2)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (2)
- Deformation (2)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Driver information (2)
- Electric vehicle (2)
- Elektrofahrzeug (2)
- Error (2)
- Fahrerinformation (2)
- Fahrstabilität (2)
- Fahrzeugsitz (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Festigkeit (2)
- Fire (2)
- Forschungsarbeit (2)
- Frau (2)
- Front (2)
- Gefahrenabwehr (2)
- Geologie (2)
- Geomembran (2)
- Geomembrane (2)
- Hospital (2)
- Human body (2)
- Intelligent transport system (2)
- Joint sealing (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Kompatibilität (2)
- Krankenhaus (2)
- Mathematical model (2)
- Menschlicher Körper (2)
- Modification (2)
- Motorway (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- PVC (2)
- Polyvinylchloride (2)
- Rechenmodell (2)
- Risiko (2)
- Risk (2)
- Road construction (2)
- Road user (2)
- Safety belt (2)
- Seat (veh) (2)
- Security (2)
- Sicherheitsgurt (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Straßenbau (2)
- Strength (mater) (2)
- Technologie (2)
- Technology (2)
- Traffic (2)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vehicle handling (2)
- Verfahren (2)
- Verkehr (2)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (2)
- Veränderung (2)
- Waterproofing (2)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (2)
- Woman (2)
- Working group (2)
- (menschl) (1)
- Accident reconstruction (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Adolescent (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Ageing (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Air quality management (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Alcohol (1)
- Alkohol (1)
- Alterung (mater) (1)
- Aluminat (1)
- Aluminate (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anti locking device (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Asphaltoberbau (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Aufprallschlitten (1)
- Auslaugung (1)
- Ausrüstung (1)
- Bearing capacity (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Bein (1)
- Beton ; Betonstraße (Oberbau) (1)
- Bewehrung (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Bindemittel (1)
- Binder (1)
- Bridge (1)
- Bridge management system (1)
- Bridge surfacing (1)
- Brittleness (1)
- Brücke (1)
- Brücken Management System (1)
- Brückenbelag (1)
- Calcium (1)
- Camera (1)
- Carriageway (1)
- Cervical vertebrae (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Clay (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Communication (1)
- Condition survey (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Costs (1)
- Crash Test (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Critical path method (1)
- Cross section (1)
- Cycle track (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data base (1)
- Data processing (1)
- Data security (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Datenverarbeitung (1)
- Decision process (1)
- Decke [Straße] (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demand (econ) (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Design (1)
- Deterioration (1)
- Development (1)
- Digitale Bildverarbeitung (1)
- Driver training (1)
- EU (1)
- Economic efficiency (1)
- Education (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Empfindlichkeit (1)
- Entscheidungsprozess (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Environment (1)
- Equipment (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- Erziehung (1)
- Evacuation (1)
- Evakuierung (1)
- Experimental road (1)
- Fahranfänger (1)
- Fahrausbildung (1)
- Fahrbahn (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Flooding (1)
- Foot (not a measure) (1)
- Force (1)
- Full depth asphalt pavement (1)
- Fuß (1)
- Gewicht (1)
- Gravity (1)
- Griffigkeit (1)
- Grooving (1)
- Halswirbel (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Heissmischgut (1)
- Highway traffic (1)
- Hot coated material (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Image processing (1)
- Impact sled (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Impact test (1)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interface (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Interview (1)
- Jugendlicher (1)
- Kalk (1)
- Kamera (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Klimawandel (1)
- Knie (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Kosten (1)
- Kraft (1)
- Kraftfahrzeug (1)
- Laboratorium (1)
- Laboratory (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Langfristig (1)
- Layer (1)
- Leaching (1)
- Learning (1)
- Lebensdauer (1)
- Lernen (1)
- Lime (1)
- Long term (1)
- Luftreinhaltung (1)
- Maintenance (1)
- Man (1)
- Mann (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Materialveraenderung (allg) (1)
- Mechanics (1)
- Mechanik (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Model (not math) (1)
- Modell (1)
- Motorcycle (1)
- Motorrad (1)
- Nachfrage (1)
- Netherlands (1)
- Netzplantechnik (1)
- Neural network (1)
- Neuronales Netz (1)
- Niederlande (1)
- Nutzwertanalyse (1)
- Oberfläche (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Oxidation (1)
- Pavement Management System (1)
- Peat (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pflasterstein (1)
- Pile (1)
- Planning (1)
- Planung (1)
- Police (1)
- Policy (1)
- Politik (1)
- Polizei (1)
- Pollutant (1)
- Polyolefin (1)
- Polyvinylhydrocarbon (1)
- Preloading (soil) (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Probability (1)
- Prototyp (1)
- Prototype (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Quer (1)
- Querschnitt (1)
- Radweg (1)
- Rail traffic (1)
- Rain (1)
- Recently qualified driver (1)
- Reconstruction (accid) (1)
- Regen (1)
- Reinforcement (in mater) (1)
- Rillenherstellung (1)
- Risikoverhalten (1)
- Risk taking (1)
- Road (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Schadstoff (1)
- Schicht (1)
- Schienenverkehr (1)
- Schnittstelle (1)
- Schutz (1)
- Schwerkraft (1)
- Sealing compound (1)
- Seite (1)
- Sensitivity (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Service life (1)
- Sett (1)
- Settlement (1)
- Setzung (1)
- Severity (acid (1)
- Side (1)
- Skidding resistance (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Spain (1)
- Spaltzugfestigkeitsversuch (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Spinal column (1)
- Splitting tensile test (1)
- Sprödigkeit (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Straße (1)
- Straßenverkehr (1)
- Stress (psychol) (1)
- Subsoil (1)
- Sulfat (1)
- Sulphate (1)
- Surface (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Test (1)
- Test procedure (1)
- Ton (Gestein) (1)
- Torf (1)
- Traffic infrastructure (1)
- Tragfähigkeit (1)
- Transfer (phys) (1)
- Transverse (1)
- Umwelt (1)
- Untergrund (1)
- Unterhaltung (1)
- Value analysis (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle safety (1)
- Verfahren ; Verkehrsinfrastruktur (1)
- Verformung (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Versuch (1)
- Versuchsstrecke (1)
- Vorbelastung (Boden) (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Wahrscheinlichkeit (1)
- Wasser (1)
- Water (1)
- Weight (1)
- Windschutzscheibe (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirbelsäule (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Wirtschaftlichkeit (1)
- Zusammenstoss (1)
- Zustandsbewertung (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
- Überschwemmung (1)
- Übertragung (phys) (1)
Institut
- Sonstige (68) (entfernen)
Radfahren - aber sicher!
(1989)
Bei der Veranstaltung, die am 16. und 17. November 1987 zu dem Thema "Radfahren - aber sicher!" in Wiesbaden stattfand, ging es darum, dem Sicherheitsbedürfnis des zunehmenden Radfahrverkehrs in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland gerecht zu werden, andererseits aber auch das nicht unproblematische Verhältnis zwischen der Radfahrerpopulation auf der einen und den übrigen Verkehrsteilnehmergruppen auf der anderen Seite auszuleuchten. In der jüngeren Vergangenheit wurden Klagen geäußert wie etwa die, dass sich die Radfahrer ihr eigenes Gesetz schafften. Von den Betroffenen wird dagegengehalten, dass die den Straßenverkehr betreffenden Gesetze und Verordnungen aus dem Blickwinkel des Kraftfahrers heraus gemacht worden seien und ein Verstoß dagegen für Radfahrer oft die naheliegendste Möglichkeit sei, einer Selbstgefährdung zu entgehen. Aus diesem Grunde wurde die Thematik in dem von der Deutschen Verkehrswacht gemeinsam mit der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) und dem Bundesverkehrsministerium durchgeführten Symposium aus unterschiedlichster Sicht angesprochen. Vertreten war sowohl die Unfallforschung, die Straßenplanung, die Fahrzeugtechnik und die Polizei wie auch die Interessenvertreter der Rad- und der Autofahrer. Von vornherein war klar, dass ein Symposium dieser Art nicht dazu angetan sein konnte, "Patentlösungen" zu erarbeiten. Ziel der Veranstaltung war es vielmehr, das gegenseitige Verständnis der unterschiedlichen Verkehrsteilnehmergruppen füreinander zu wecken bzw. zu fördern. Dabei wurde deutlich, dass auch die Problematik des "Rollenwechsels" keineswegs frei von Schwierigkeiten ist: Das Verhalten des möglicherweise überwiegenden Teils der Verkehrsteilnehmer ist nicht so sehr an einem Grundwissen und ein Grundverhalten gebunden, als vielmehr von der Art der jeweiligen Verkehrsteilnahme abhängig.
An approach to the standardization of accident and injury registration systems (STAIRS) in Europe
(1998)
STAIRS is a European Commission funded study whose aim is to produce a set of guidelines for a harmonised, crash injury database. The need to evaluate the effectiveness of the forthcoming European Union front and side impact directives has emphasised the need for real world crash injury data-sets that can be representative of the crash population throughout Europe. STAIRS will provide a methodology to achieve this. The ultimate aim of STAIRS is to produce a set of data collection tools which will aid decision making on vehicle crashworthiness as well as providing a means to evaluate the effectiveness of safety regulations. This paper will disseminate the up-to-date findings of the group as they try to harmonise their methods. The stage has been reached where studies into the diverse methods of the UK, French and German systems of crash injury investigation have been undertaken. An assessment has already been made of the relationships between the three current systems in order to define the areas of agreement and divergence. The conclusions reached stated that there were many areas that are already closely related and that the differences were only at the detailed level. With the emphasis on secondary safety and injury causation, core data sets were decided upon, taking into account: vehicle description, collision configuration, structural response of vehicles, restraint and airbag performance, child restraint performance, Euro NCAP, pedestrian and vehicle occupant kinematics, injury description and causation. Each variable was studied objectively, the important elements isolated and developed into a form that all partners were agreeable on. A glossary of terms is being developed as the project progresses which includes ISO standards and other definitions from the associated CAREPLUS project, which addresses the comparability of national data sets. A major consideration of the group was the data collection method to be employed. The strengths and weaknesses of each study were investigated to obtain a clear idea of which aspects offered the best way forward. The quality of this information and transference into a common format, as well as the necessary error checking systems to be employed have just been completed and are described. In tandem with this area of study the problem of the statistical relationship of each sample to the national population is also being investigated. The study proposes a mechanism to use a sample of crash injury data to represent the national and international crash injury problem
A means of assessing the passive safety of automobiles is a desirable instrument for legislative bodies, the automobile industry, and the consumer. As opposed to the dominating motor vehicle assessment criteria, such as engine power, spaciousness, aerodynamics and consumption, there are no clear and generally accepted criteria for assessing the passive safety of cars. The proposed method of assessment combines the results of experimental safety tests, carried out according to existing legally prescribed or currently discussed testing conditions, and a biomechanical validation of the loading values determined in the test. This evaluation is carried out with the aid of risk functions which are specified for individual parts of the body by correlating the results of accident analysis with those obtained by computer simulation. The degree of conformance to the respective protection criterion thus deduced is then weighted with factors which take into account the frequency of occurrence and the severity of the accident on the basis of resulting costs. Each of the test series includes at least two frontal and one lateral crash test against a deformable barrier. The computer-aided analysis and evaluation of the simulation results enables a vehicle-specific overall safety index as well as partial and individual safety values to be determined and plotted graphically. The passive safety provided by the respective vehicle under test can be defined for specific seating positions, special types of accident, or for individual endangered parts of the body.
Side-impact safety of passenger cars is assessed in Europe in a full-scale test using a moving barrier. The front of this barrier is deformable and represents the stiffness of an 'average' car. The EU Directive 96/27/EC on side impact protection has adopted the EEVC Side Impact Test Procedure, including the original performance specification for the barrier face when impacting a flat dynamometric rigid wall. The requirements of the deformable barrier face, as laid down in the Directive, are related to geometrical characteristics, deformation characteristics and energy dissipation figures. Due to these limited requirements, many variations are possible in designing a deformable barrier face. As a result, several barrier face designs are in the market. However, research institutes and car manufacturers report significant difference in test results when using these different devices. It appears that the present approval test is not able to distinguish between the different designs that may perform differently when they impact real vehicles. Therefore, EEVC Working Group 13 has developed a number of tests to evaluate the different designs. In these tests the barrier faces are loaded and deformed in a specific and/or more representative way. Barrier faces of different design have been evaluated. In the paper the set-up and the reasoning behind the tests is presented. Results showing specific differences in performance are demonstrated.
This paper provides an overview of the research work of the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) in the field of crash compatibility between passenger cars. Since July 1997 the EC Commission is partly funding the research work of EEVC. The running period of this project will be two years. The progress of five working packages of this research project is presented: Literature review, Accident analysis, Structural survey of cars, Crash testing, and Mathematical modelling. According to the planned time schedule the progress of research work is different for the five working packages.
The first stage of the work has been to collate information on bridge assessment from the participating countries. In the later stages, the aim is to provide guidelines that reflect the current best practices, a methodology that will allow for future development and sufficient flexibility to accommodate variations in national priorities as the process of harmonisation is pursued. The following tasks fall within the scope of the project: (1) a review of current procedures and standards used for bridge assessment in Europe; (2) the development of models for taking into account the bridge specific traffic conditions and material properties; (3) the use of reliability methods based on a probabilistic approach for bridge assessment including the use of measurements for updating the reliability of structural elements; and (4) the provision of recommendations for methods and procedures that can be adopted for the assessment module of the management framework highlighting where further development will be beneficial.
Despite the steadily declining number of pedestrian fatalities and injuries in most European countries during recent decades, pedestrian protection is still of great importance in the European Union as well as in Germany. This is because they still constitute a large proportion of road user casualties and are more likely to suffer serious and fatal injuries than most other road users. In 1999 only car occupants suffered more fatal injuries than pedestrians in Germany. In December 1998, EEVC WG 17 completed their review and updating of the EEVC WG 10 pedestrian test procedure that made it possible to evaluate the protection afforded to pedestrians by the front of passenger cars in an accident. Within the scope of this procedure, four different impactors are used representing those parts of the body which are injured very often and/or very seriously in vehicle-pedestrian-collisions. In a project executed by IKA and BASt, a small family car was tested according to the EEVC WG 17 test procedure. Afterwards modifications to the car were carried out in order to improve the pedestrian protection provided by the vehicle design. There were certain restrictions placed on the level of modifications undertaken, e.g. only minor modifications to vehicle styling and to the vehicle structures, which provide passenger protection. The redesigned vehicle was tested again using the WG 17 test procedure. The test results of the modified vehicle were compared with those of the standard vehicle and evaluated. The results show that considered measures for pedestrian protection in many areas of the vehicle front structure and the use of innovative techniques can lead to a significant reduction of the loads of pedestrians at an acceptable expense.
The Swedish National Road Administration (SNRA), the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) and the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) are co-operating in the International Harmonized Research Activities on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IHRA-ITS). Under this umbrella a joint study was conducted. The overall objective of this study was to contribute to the definition and validation of a "battery of tools" which enables a prediction and an assessment of changes in driver workload due to the use of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) while driving. In this sense \"validation\" means to produce empirical evidence from which it can be concluded that these methods reliably discriminate between IVIS which differ in terms of relevant features of the HMI-design. Additionally these methods should also be sensitive to the task demands imposed on the driver by the traffic situation and their interactions with HMI-design. To achieve these goals experimental validation studies (on-road and in the simulator) were performed in Sweden, Germany and Japan. As a common element these studies focused on the secondary task methodology as an approach to the study of driver workload. In a joint German-Swedish on-road study the Peripheral Detection Task (PDT) was assessed with respect to its sensitivity to the complexity of traffic situations and effects of different types of navigation systems. Results show that the PDT performance of both the German and the Swedish subjects reflects the task demands of the traffic situations better than those of the IVIS. However, alternative explanations are possible which will be examined by further analyses. Results of this study are supplemented by the Japanese study where informational demands induced by various traffic situations were analysed by using a simple arithmetic task as a secondary task. Results of this study show that relatively large task demands can be expected even from simple traffic situations.
The frontal crash is still an important contributor to deaths and serious injured resulting from road accidents in Europe. As the Hybrid-III dummy used in crash tests is over two decades old, the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee is studying the potential for a new test device. Key is the availability of a well-defined set of requirements that identifies the minimum level of biofidelity required for an advanced frontal dummy. In this paper, a complete set of frontal impact biofidelity requirements, consisting of references , description of test conditions and corridors, is presented.
When the EEVC proposed the full-scale side impact test procedure, it recommended that consideration should be given to an interior headform test in addition. This was to evaluate areas of contact not assessed by the dummy. EEVC Working Group 13 has been researching the parameters of a possible European headform test procedure in four phases. Earlier stages of the research have been presented at previous ESV conferences. The conclusions from these have suggested that the US free motion headform should be used in any European test procedure and that it should be a free flight test, not guided. This research has now culminated in proposals for a European test procedure. This paper presents the proposed EEVC side impact interior headform test procedure, giving the rationale for the test and the first results from the validation phase of the test protocol.
Federal highway A 26 in Germany : reinforced dams in soft soils - control method according DIN 1054
(2004)
In 2001 the construction of the Federal Highway A 26 in Lower Saxony (north of Germany) was started. In this area the underground is without any substantial bearing capacity as it consists of soft layers ( clay, peat) with a thickness of up to 12 m. Because it was not possible to exchange the soil neither completely nor partially pre-loading procedure (consolidation method) was chosen for this construction. Short- and long-term stability are ensured by the use of high-tensile fabrics for reinforcement at the dam basis. The vertical and horizontal deformations and the stress changes in the soil, caused by the pre-load procedure, has to be controlled by special geotechnical measurements. Additionally, in the higher parts of the dam the strain behaviour of the high-tensile fabrics is measured. These measurements form the basis for the application of the control method according DIN 1054. In this article, the special circumstances of this project are described. Further on the geotechnical measurements, the winning and evaluation of the necessary parameters of the subsoil, and the consequences of these data for the ongoing of the project are laid down. Intermediate results of the geotechnical measurements are described.
The European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee wants to promote the use of more biofidelic child dummies and biomechanical based tolerance limits in regulatory and consumer testing. This study has investigated the feasibility and potential impact of Q-dummies and new injury criteria for child restraint system assessment in frontal impact. European accident statistics have been reviewed for all ECE-R44 CRS groups. For frontal impact, injury measures are recommended for the head, neck, chest and abdomen. Priority of body segment protection depends on the ECE-R44 group. The Q-dummy family is able to reflect these injuries, because of its biofidelity performance and measurement capabilities for these body segments. Currently, the Q0, Q1, Q1.5, Q3 and Q6 are available representing children of 0, 1, 1.5, 3 and 6 years old. These Q-dummies cover almost all dummy weight groups as defined in ECE-R44. Q10, representing a 10 year-old child, is under development. New child dummy injury criteria are under discussion in EEVC WG12. Therefore, the ECE-R44 criteria are assessed by comparing the existing P-dummies and new Q-dummies in ECE-R44 frontal impact sled tests. In total 300 tests covering 30 CRSs of almost all existing child seat categories are performed by 11 European organizations. From this benchmark study, it is concluded that the performance of the Q-dummy family is good with respect to repeatability of the measurement signals and the durability of the dummies. Applying ECE-R44 criteria, the first impression is that results for P- and Q-dummy are similar. For child seat evaluation the potential merits of the Q-dummy family lie in the extra measurement possibilities of these dummies and in the more biofidelic response.
Der Allgemeine Deutsche Automobil-Club e.V. (ADAC) und die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) veranstalteten am 13. Oktober 2006 in Baden-Baden das 6. Symposium "Sicher fahren in Europa". Die Fachvorträge befassten sich mit den Themenbereichen: Ansätze zu mehr Verkehrssicherheit, - Verbesserung der Fahrzeugsicherheit, - Besondere Zielgruppen. Die CD-ROM dokumentiert die Grußworte, die Referate und die Podiumsdiskussion.
At the 2005 ESV conference, the International Harmonisation of Research Activities (IHRA) side impact working group proposed a 4 part draft test procedure, to form the basis of harmonisation of regulation world-wide and to help advances in car occupant protection. This paper presents the work performed by a European Commission 6th framework project, called APROSYS, an further development and evaluation of the proposed procedure from a European perspective. The 4 parts of the proposed procedure are: - A Mobile Deformable Barrier test; - An oblique Pole side impact test; - Interior headform tests; - Side Out of Position (OOP) tests. Full scale test and modelling work to develop the Advanced European Mobile Deformable Barrier (AE-MDB) further is described, resulting in a recommendation to revise the barrier face to include a bumper beam element. An evaluation of oblique and perpendicular pole tests was made from tests and numerical simulations using ES-2 and WorldSID 50th percentile dummies. It was concluded that an oblique pole test is feasible but that a perpendicular test would be preferable for Europe. The interior headform test protocol was evaluated to assess its repeatability and reproducibility and to solve issues such as the head impact angle and limitation zones. Recommendations for updates to the test protocol are made. Out-of-position (OOP) tests applicable for the European situation were performed, which included additional tests with Child Restraint Systems (CRS) which use is mandatory in Europe. It was concluded that the proposed IHRA OOP tests do cover the worst case situations, but the current test protocol is not ready for regulatory use.
The use of proper child restraint systems (CRS) is mandatory for children travelling in cars in most countries of the world. The analysis of the quantity of restrained children shows that more than 90% of the children in Germany are restrained. Looking at the quality of the protection, a large discrepancy between restrained and well protected children can be seen. Two out of three children in Germany are not properly restrained. In addition, considerable difference exists with respect to the technical performance of CRS. For that reason investigations and optimisations on two different topics are necessary: The technical improvement of CRS and the ease of use of CRS. Consideration of the knowledge gained by the comparison of different CRS in crash tests would lead to some improvements of the CRS. But improvement of child safety is not only a technical issue. People should use CRS in the correct way. Misuse and incorrect handling could lead to less safety than correct usage of a poor CRS. For that reason new technical issues are necessary to improve the child safety AND the ease of use. Only the combination of both parts can significantly increase child safety. For the assessment of the safety level of common CRS, frontal and lateral sled tests simulating different severity levels were conducted comparing pairs of CRS which were felt to be good and CRS which were felt to be poor. The safety of some CRS is currently at a high level. All well known products were not damaged in the performed tests. The performance of non-branded CRS was mostly worse than that of the well known products. Although the branded child restraint systems already show a high safety level it is still possible to further improve their technical performance as demonstrated with a baby shell and a harness type CRS.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
The PDB, BASt and Opel conducted two test series to evaluate possible effects on the results obtained using the EEVC WG17 Lower Legform Impactor as a test tool for the assessment of pedestrian safety. The reproducibility and repeatability of the test results were assessed using six legform impactors while keeping the test parameters constant. In the second series one impactor was used and the test parameters were varied to assess the effects on the readings of the legform. The test parameters were velocity, temperature, relative humidity, the point of first contact regarding the deviation in z-direction and the deviations of the pitch, roll and yaw angle. The tests were performed using an inverse setup, i.e. the legform was hit by a guided linear impactor equipped with a honeycomb deformation element. This setup was chosen to be able to vary each single parameter while avoiding variations of the other test parameters at the same time. The test parameters were varied stronger than allowed in regulatory use in order to determine possible dependencies between the parameters and the readings which were acceleration, bending angle and shear displacement.
Straßentunnel mit integriertem Rettungsweg: Konstruktions- und betriebliche Sicherheitsaspekte
(2009)
Infolge der seit 2003 in den RABT formulierten schärferen Sicherheitsanforderungen ist für Gegenverkehrstunnel bei Neuplanungen und bautechnischen Nachrüstungen häufig die Anordnung eines parallel zur Hauptröhre verlaufenden Rettungsstollens erforderlich. Untersuchungen der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) zur Wirtschaftlichkeit verschiedener aktueller und auch neuer Querschnittsvarianten haben gezeigt, dass insbesondere ein Querschnitt mit integriertem begehbarem Rettungsweg unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen Kostenvorteile gegenüber der Regellösung mit parallelem Rettungsstollen bietet. In ergänzenden Untersuchungen wurden konstruktive und sicherheitstechnische Detailfragen für einen Regelquerschnitt mit integriertem Rettungsweg untersucht und bewertet und ein Kostenvergleich mit der Regellösung mit parallelem Rettungsstollen wurde durchgeführt.
Powered Two Wheelers (PTWs) accidents constitute one of the road safety problems in Europe. PTWs fatalities represent 22% at EU level in 2006, having increased during last years, representing an opposite trend compared to other road users" figures. In order to reduce these figures it is necessary to investigate the accident causation mechanisms from different points of view (e.g.: human factor, vehicle characteristics, influence of the environment, type of accident). SAFERIDER project ("Advanced telematics for enhancing the SAFEty and comfort of motorcycle RIDERs", under the European Commission "7th Framework Program") has investigated PTW accident mechanisms through literature review and statistical analyses of National and In-depth accident databases; detecting and describing all the possible PTW's accident configurations where the implementation of ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) and IVIS (In-Vehicle Information Systems) could contribute to avoid an accident or mitigate its severity. DIANA, the Spanish in-depth database developed by CIDAUT, has been analyzed for that purpose. DIANA comprises of accident investigation teams, in close cooperation with police forces, medical services, forensic surgeons, garages and scrap yards. An important innovation is the fact that before injured people arrive to hospitals, photographs and explanations about the possible accident injury mechanisms are sent to the respective hospitals (via 3G GPRS technology). By this, additional information to medical staff can be provided in order to predict in advance possible internal injuries and select the best medical treatment. This methodology is presented in this paper. On the other hand, the main results (corresponding to road, rider and PTW characteristics; pre and post-accident manoeuvres; road layout; rider behaviour; impact points; accident causations;...) from the analyses of the PTW accidents used for SAFERIDER are shown. Only accident types relevant to ADAS and IVIS devices have been considered.
Since its beginning in 1999, the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) evolved into the presumably leading representative road traffic accident investigation in Europe, based on the work started in Hanover in 1973. The detailed and comprehensive description of traffic accidents forms an essential basis for vehicle safety research. Due to the ongoing extension of demands of researchers, there is a continuous progress in the techniques and systematic of accident investigation within GIDAS. This paper presents some of the most important developments over the last years. Primary vehicle safety systems are expected to have a significant and increasing influence on reducing accidents. GIDAS therefore began to include and collect active safety parameters as new variables from the year 2005 onwards. This will facilitate to assess the impact of present and future active safety measures. A new system to analyse causation factors of traffic accidents, called ACASS, was implemented in GIDAS in the year 2008. The whole process of data handling was optimised. Since 2005 the on-scene data acquisition is completely conducted with mobile tablet PCs. Comprehensive plausibility checks assure a high data quality. Multi-language codebooks are automatically generated from the database structure itself and interfaces ensure the connection to various database management systems. Members of the consortium can download database and codebook, and synchronize half a terabyte of photographic documentation through a secured online access. With the introduction of the AIS 2005 in the year 2006, some medical categorizations have been revised. To ensure the correct assignment of AIS codes to specific injuries an application based on a diagnostic dictionary was developed. Furthermore a coding tool for the AO classification was introduced. All these enhancements enable GIDAS to be up to date for future research questions.