Sonstige
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Vehicle regulations (8) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (8)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (3)
Ziel des Projektes war es, bedingt durch die wachsende Anzahl der im Verkehr befindlichen elektrisch und hybrid-elektrisch betriebenen Fahrzeuge, notwendige Anpassungen der periodisch technischen Überwachung zu erarbeiten. Dazu wurden von verschiedenen Fahrzeugen die relevanten Bauteile des elektrischen Antriebsstrangs identifiziert und deren Ausfallverhalten analysiert. Um die Degradationsauswirkungen einzelner Bauteile und Funktionen auf das gesamte System bestimmen zu können, hat die FSD ein Simulationsmodell erstellt. Die daraus ermittelten Ergebnisse waren Grundlage für die Bestimmung verkehrssicherheits- und umweltkritischer Bauteile sowie deren Funktionen. Diese Modellaussagen wurden mit Realversuchen an Fahrzeugen validiert. Zusätzlich konnten in einem Feldversuch 2.560 Fahrzeuge mit elektrischem Antriebsstrang untersucht werden. Aus diesen Ergebnissen lassen sich Änderungsvorschläge für die Untersuchungen und Vorgaben ableiten. Dafür ist für einen Großteil dieser Untersuchungen die Nutzung von Diagnosedaten eine geeignete Möglichkeit. Die 47. Verordnung zur Änderung straßenverkehrsrechtlicher Vorschriften berücksichtigt bereits an vielen Stellen die neuen Antriebskonzepte. Von daher werden lediglich geringe Anpassungen in der StVZO für -§ 19 und den Beispielkatalog dazu, -§ 29, Anlage VIIIa, Anlage VIIId sowie die HU-Richtlinie vorgeschlagen. Für die Durchführung der Untersuchungspunkte zum HV-System ist die Entwicklung einer Hochvolt-Richtlinie empfehlenswert. Einige wichtige Prüfverfahren lassen sich derzeit technisch noch nicht umsetzen. Dazu sind Änderungen der internationalen Bau- und Betriebsvorschriften notwendig. Diese werden bei der EU/UNECE anzuregen sein. Es besteht über dieses Projekt hinaus weiterhin Forschungsbedarf, um sich intensiv mit diesen Fahrzeugen zu befassen und deren Weiterentwicklung zu beobachten, damit notwendige Auswirkungen auf die PTI rechtzeitig erkannt werden können.
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe (EU27) is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car's safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EU-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car's frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation. This paper reports the cost benefit analyses performed to estimate the effect of the following potential changes to the frontal impact regulation: • Option 1 " No change and allow current measures to propagate throughout the vehicle fleet. • Option 2 " Add a full width test to the current offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) test. • Option 3 " Add a full width test and replace the current ODB test with a Progressive Deformable Barrier (PDB) test. For the analyses national data were used from Great Britain (STATS 19) and from Germany (German Federal Statistical Office). In addition in-depth real word crash data were used from CCIS (Great Britain) and GIDAS (Germany). To estimate the benefit a generalised linear model, an injury reduction model and a matched pairs modelling approach were applied. The benefits were estimated to be: for Option 1 "No change" about 2.0%; for Option 2 "FW test" ranging from 5 to 12% and for Option 3 "FW and PDB tests" 9 to 14% of car occupant killed and seriously injured casualties.
The term driver assistance systems in the chapter title shall be understood to include vehicle automation. This chapter starts with a homogeneous and consistent classification and nomenclature of all kinds of driver assistance systems known and under discussion today (including vehicle automation). It thereby builds upon familiar classification schemes by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and the standardization body SAE international. Detailed evaluation of the German legal situation for driver assistance systems and vehicle automation is provided in the following Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, an overview is given on the legal system in the US to reveal aspects relevant for vehicle automation. This is intended as initial information for those not acquainted to the US legal system which has been the first to regulate automation in several federal states. Finally, in Sect. 4, the current rating scheme of the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) is presented in comparison to legal instruments. The model of a consumer protection based approach proves to be a flexible instrument with great advantages in promoting new technologies. Technical vehicle regulations on the other hand rule minimum requirements. Both approaches are needed to achieve maximum vehicle safety.
A series of drop tests and vehicle tests with the adult head impactor according to Regulation (EC) 631/2009 and drop tests with the phantom head impactor according to UN Regulation No. 43 have been carried out by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development (BMVBS). Aim of the test series was to study the injury risk for vulnerable road users, especially pedestrians, in case of being impacted by a motor vehicle in a way described within the European Regulations (EC) 78/2009 and (EC) 631/2009. Furthermore, the applicability of the phantom head drop test described in UN Regulation No. 43 for plastic glazing should be investigated. In total, 30 drop tests, thereof 18 with the adult head impactor and 12 with the phantom head impactor, and 49 vehicle tests with the adult head impactor were carried out on panes of laminated safety glass (VSG), polycarbonate (PC) and laminated polycarbonate (L-PC). The influence of parameters such as the particular material properties, test point locations, fixations, ambient conditions (temperature and impact angle) was investigated in detail. In general, higher values of the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) were observed in tests on polycarbonate glazing. As the HIC is the current criterion for the assessment of head injury risk, polycarbonate glazing has to be seen as more injurious in terms of vulnerable road user protection. In addition, the significantly higher rebound of the head observed in tests with polycarbonate glazing is suspected to lead to higher neck loads and may also cause higher injury risks in secondary impacts of vulnerable road users. However, as in all tests with PC glazing no damage of the panes was observed, the risk of skin cut injuries may be expected to be reduced significantly. The performed test series give no indication for the test procedure prescribed in UN Regulation No. 43 as a methodology to approve glass windscreen not being feasible for polycarbonate glazing, as all PC panes tested fulfilled the UN R 43 requirements. The performance of the windscreen area will not be relevant for vehicle type approval according to the upcoming UN Regulation for pedestrian protection. However, it is recommended that pedestrian protection being considered for plastic windscreens to ensure at least the same level of protection as glass windscreens.
Although the bus belongs to the safest traffic means, single accidents can be particularly severe and concern many passengers. Especially in case of fires a high number of injured and killed persons can be the outcome. Fire safety of buses therefore is of high importance. With the increase of plastic materials as a material for the interior equipment of buses and coaches due to their good mechanical properties combined with low weight, the question arises whether the safety level has decreased in case of a fire during the last years " also compared to other means of transport. Because of the combustible plastics and their ability to release a high amount of heat the main fire load in buses is no longer the fuel but the plastic materials which are also often easy to ignite. Besides the flammability of the equipments, also the production of smoke, the smoke development and propagation as well as its toxicity are of interest. That counts for the passengers as well as for the test methods and its limit values. The severe fire in Germany near Hanover in 2008 with 20 fatalities showed how disastrous such fires can be. For those reasons several research projects were initiated on behalf of the German Federal Highway Research Institute. At the one hand the fire behaviour of coach interiors was examined in general focusing on fire propagation as well as fire detection and signalling. As result, recommendations with regard to early fire detection systems for the engine compartments and onboard extinguishing equipment were elaborated. On the other hand research was carried out to examine heat release, smoke, smoke propagation and its toxicity due to burning bus interior materials. In this project small and real scale experiments on material specimens, interior parts and vehicles were performed. Trains and buses often have very similar operation conditions. Consequently, bus interior material was tested according to the regulations for rail vehicles, i.e. DIN EN 45545 as well as DIN 5510. None of the tested bus interior materials would have been allowed to use in a train. The fire safety regulations for bus materials are on a low level compared to other transport sectors, i.e. railway, ship and aircraft. Also numerical investigations with the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) were performed. The very rapid fire development during the severe bus fire from 2008 could be predicted with the numerical model. The model was then used to investigate the influence of different materials, ventilation conditions and ignition sources. The bus materials contribute significantly to a very rapid fire development in bus fires. Especially, the flammable ceiling and the passenger seats were identified to be key issues of the fire propagation in a bus and can be explained by the rapid fire spread along the ceiling and the high fire load of passenger seats. As conclusion of the project effective and economically reasonable fire safety requirements for interiors of buses are recommended which would improve the current situation. Proposals for amendments of current requirements are recommended including the specification of appropriate limit values. In particular, it is taken into consideration which reasonable fire safety standards from other transport sectors, especially the rail sector, should be transferred to buses
Automotive interiors have long been a potentially injurious impact area to occupants during accidents, especially in the absence of adequate padding. The U.S. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 201, Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, outlines test procedures and performance criteria in order to mitigate potentially injurious head impacts to interior surfaces. FMVSS 201 specifies a finite set of impact locations and applies to passenger vehicles of a specified year range and with a gross vehicle weight rating less than 10,000 lb. In this paper, two head impact test methodologies are presented, a pendulum-test device and a Free Motion Headform (FMH) launching device, which allows for dynamic, repeatable impact evaluation of various vehicle interior surfaces and their impact attenuation abilities. The presented testing includes multiple series that evaluate the effect of differing vehicle upper interior padding on occupant head injury. One study in particular, analyzes a head impact to the side header of a heavy truck (not included in FMVSS 201) during a 90 degree rollover. Additionally, two other series of tests are presented which assess the injury reduction effect of side airbags to near side as well as far side occupants in a side impact scenario. Lastly, a forensic analysis is presented which evaluates two possible head impact locations experienced in a real world accident by analysis of the resulting interior compartment damage utilizing the FMH launching device test method. The data collected and presented includes accelerometer instrumentation and high speed video analysis. These studies demonstrate that adequate padding and airbags are very effective at mitigating head injury potential at impact speeds of 12-25 mph (19-40 kph).
Die verschärften Anforderungen an das Emissionsverhalten von Pkw und leichten Nutzfahrzeugen haben aufwändige Technologien erforderlich gemacht. Ein wesentlicher Bestandteil aktueller Abgasnachbehandlungssysteme ist der Katalysator. Wenn ein Katalysator beschädigt wird oder seine Wirksamkeit nachlässt, kann er durch einen Austauschkatalysator ersetzt werden. Austauschkatalysatoren, die im Zubehörmarkt angeboten werden, werden auf Basis der Regelung Nr. 103 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UNECE - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) genehmigt. Entsprechend dieser Regelung muss der Austauschkatalysator so beschaffen sein und so eingebaut werden können, dass das Fahrzeug den Vorschriften der Regelungen entspricht, die bei seiner Typprüfung zu Grunde gelegt worden sind. Außerdem müssen die Schadstoffemissionen während der gesamten normalen Lebensdauer des Fahrzeuges unter normalen Betriebsbedingungen wirksam begrenzt werden. Im Rahmen des Forschungsvorhabens wurde die Dauerhaltbarkeit von Austauschkatalysatoren untersucht. Als Testfahrzeug wurde ein VW Golf der Abgasstufe Euro 4 mit einem 1.4-l-Benzinmotor (55 kW) ausgewaehlt. Bei Beginn der Untersuchungen wies das Fahrzeug eine Laufleistung von 75.500 km auf. Das ausgewählte Fahrzeug war regelmäßig entsprechend den Herstellervorgaben gewartet worden. Im OBD-System waren keine abgasrelevanten Fehler abgelegt. Bei der Eingangsmessung des Fahrzeuges im Anlieferungszustand mit dem ursprünglich verbauten Katalysator wurden die anzuwendenden Euro 4-Grenzwerte deutlich unterschritten. Anschließend wurden ein Original-Austauschkatalysator, der in einer markengebundenen Fachwerkstatt, und 4 Katalysatoren, die verdeckt im freien Teilemarkt beschafft worden waren, untersucht. Die Austauschkatalysatoren wurden entsprechend den Vorgaben der ECE Regelung Nr. 103 konditioniert und dann im Neuzustand vermessen. Anschließend wurden die Katalysatoren auf einem Brennerprüfstand gealtert. Dabei wurde eine Laufleistung von insgesamt 80.000 km simuliert. Nach 10.000 km und 40.000 km wurde die Alterung unterbrochen und die Abgasemissionen des Testfahrzeugs wurden mit den gealterten Katalysatoren gemessen. Sobald bei einem Katalysator eine Grenzwertüberschreitung festgestellt wurde, wurde die Untersuchung beendet. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung zeigen, dass bei im freien Teilemarkt erhältlichen Austauschsystemen zur Abgasnachbehandlung erhebliche Qualitätsunterschiede auftreten können. Nur mit dem Original-Austauschkatalysator und mit einem Austauschkatalysator, der im freien Markt beschafft worden war, konnten auch nach einer Alterung über 80.000 km die Euro 4 Grenzwerte eingehalten werden. Bei einem Austauschkatalysator wurden bereits im Neuzustand die Euro 4 Grenzwerte überschritten. Bei einem anderen Austauschkatalysator wurde die Untersuchung nach 10.000 km Alterung und bei einem weiteren Katalysator nach 40.000 km Alterung aufgrund einer Überschreitung der Euro 4 Grenzwerte abgebrochen. Die ECE Regelung Nr. 103 sieht eine Prüfung der Dauerhaltbarkeit derartiger Systeme über 80.000 km vor, ermöglicht jedoch alternativ die Verwendung von festen Verschlechterungsfaktoren. In der Praxis wird die Dauerhaltbarkeit der Austauschsysteme zur Abgasnachbehandlung von ihren Herstellern garantiert, eine Überprüfung findet im Rahmen der Genehmigung jedoch in den seltensten Fällen statt. Eine Feldüberwachung für Austauschsysteme zur Abgasnachbehandlung ist in den entsprechenden Vorschriften nicht vorgesehen. Die Ergebnisse dieser Untersuchung weisen darauf hin, dass die Anforderungen in der ECE Regelung Nr. 103 nicht ausreichen, um die Dauerhaltbarkeit von Austauschkatalysatoren sicherzustellen.
High demands on exhaust emissions of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles require complex technologies. The three-way catalytic converter is an essential part of state of the art emission control systems. If a catalytic converter is damaged or its effectiveness deteriorates, it can be replaced by a replacement converter. Replacement catalytic converters from the aftermarket are approved on the basis of Regulation No 103 of the UNECE - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. According to this regulation the replacement catalytic converter shall be designed, constructed and capable of being mounted so as to enable the vehicle to comply with the provisions taken as a basis for its type approval. Furthermore the pollution emissions must be effectively limited throughout the entire normal service life of the vehicle under normal operating conditions. In the context of the research project, the durability of replacement catalytic converters was examined. A VW Golf with emission standard Euro 4, 1.4 l petrol engine (55 kW) was selected as a test vehicle. At the start of the examinations, the vehicle showed a mileage of 75,000 km. The selected vehicle was regularly serviced in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. No emission-relevant faults were recorded by the OBD system. The initial control measurement of the vehicle in as-delivered condition with the originally installed catalytic converter showed that the corresponding emissions of the regulated pollutants were considerably below the Euro 4 emission limits to be applied. Subsequently, an original replacement catalytic converter, which was purchased from an authorised dealer, and 4 catalytic converters purchased in the independent aftermarket, were examined. The replacement catalytic converters were conditioned according to the specifications of ECE Regulation No 103 and then measured in new condition. The catalytic converters were then aged on a burner test rig. Here a total mileage of 80,000 km was simulated. After 10,000 km and 40,000 km, the ageing was interrupted and the exhaust gas emissions of the test vehicle with the aged catalytic converters were measured. The examination was ended as soon as a limit value had been exceeded. The results of the project indicate that with the replacement systems for the after-treatment of exhaust gases available in the independent aftermarket, considerable quality differences can occur. At the end of the ageing over a distance of 80,000 km only the original replacement catalytic converter and one replacement catalytic converter from the independent aftermarket complied with the Euro 4 emission limits. With one replacement catalytic converter, the Euro 4 emission limits were already exceeded in new condition. With another replacement catalytic converter, the examination was aborted after 10,000 km ageing and with a further catalytic converter after 40,000 km ageing due to the Euro 4 emission limits being exceeded. The ECE Regulation No 103 provides for a test of durability of such systems over 80,000 km, but also alternatively enables the use of fixed deterioration factors. In practice, the durability of the replacement systems for the after-treatment of exhaust gases is guaranteed by their manufacturers. However, replacement catalytic converters are rarely inspected as part of the approval. In-use compliance provisions for replacement systems for the after-treatment of exhaust gases are not mentioned in the corresponding specifications. The results of this study indicate that the requirements in the ECE Regulation No 103 are not adequate to ensure the durability of replacement catalytic converters.