Sonstige
Cyclists are more likely to be injured in fatal crashes than motorised vehicles. To gain detailed and precise behavioural data of road users, i.e. trajectories, a measuring campaign was conducted. Therefore, a black-spot for accidents with cyclists in Berlin, Germany was selected. The traffic has been detected by a fully automated traffic video analysis system continuously for twelve hours. The video surveillance system is capable of automatically extracting trajectories, classifying road user types and precise determining and positioning of conflicts and accidents. Additionally, pre-conflict and pre-accident situations could be analysed to provide further in-depth understanding of accident causation. The evaluation of the measuring campaign comprised the investigation of traffic parameters, e.g. traffic flow, as well as traffic-safety related parameters based on Surrogate Safety Measures (SSM). Furthermore, the spatial and temporal distributions of conflicts involving cyclists were determined. As a result, three possible conflict clusters could be identified, of which one cluster could be confirmed by detailed video analysis, showing conflicts caused by right turning vehicles.
Injury probability functions for pedestrians and bicyclists based on real-world accident data
(2017)
The paper is focusing on the modelling of injury severity probabilities, often called as Injury Risk Functions (IRF). These are mathematical functions describing the probability for a defined population and for possible explanatory factors (variables) to sustain a certain injury severity. Injury risk functions are becoming more and more important as basis for the assessment of automotive safety systems. They contribute to the understanding of injury mechanisms, (prospective) evaluation of safety systems and definition of protection criteria or are used within regulation and/or consumer ratings. In all cases, knowledge about the correlation between mechanical behavior and injury severity is needed. IRFs are often based on biomechanical data. This paper is focusing on the derivation of injury probability models from real world accident data of the GIDAS database (German In-depth Accident Study). In contrast to most academic terms there is no explicit term definition or definition of creation processes existing for injury probability models based on empirical data. Different approaches are existing for such kind of models in the field of accident research. There is a need for harmonization in terms of the used methods and data as well as the handling with the existing challenges. These are preparation of the dataset, model assumptions, censored/unknown data, evaluation of model accuracy, definition of dependent and independent variable, and others. In the presented study, several empirical, statistical and phenomenological approaches were analyzed regarding their advantages and disadvantages and also their applicability. Furthermore, the identification of appropriate prediction parameters for the injury severity of pedestrians has been considered. Due to its main effect on injuries of pedestrians and bicyclists, the importance of the secondary impact has also been analyzed. Finally, the model accuracy, evaluated by several criteria, is the rating factor that gives the quality and reliability for application of the resulting models. After the investigation and evaluation of statistical approaches one method was chosen and appropriate prediction variables were examined. Finally, all findings were summarized and injury risk functions for pedestrians in real world accidents were created. Additionally, the paper gives instructions for the interpretation and usage of such functions. The presented results include IRFs for several injury severity levels and age groups. The presented models are based on a high amount of real world accidents and describe very well the injury severity probability of pedestrians and bicyclists in frontal collisions with current vehicles. The functions can serve as basis for the evaluation of effectiveness of systems like Pedestrian-AEB or Bicycle-AEB.
To elucidate the risk of pedestrians, bicycle and motorbike users, data of two accident research units from 1999 to 2014 were analysed in regard to demographic data, collision details, preclinical and clinical data using SPSS. 14.295 injured vulnerable road users were included. 92 out of 3610 pedestrians ("P", 2.5%), 90 out of 8307 bicyclists ("B", 1.1%) and 115 out of 4094 motorcycle users ("M", 2.8%) were diagnosed with spinal fractures. Thoracic fractures were most frequent ahead of lumbar and cervical fractures. Car collisions were most frequent mechanism (68, 62 and 36%). MAIS was 3.8, 2.8 and 3.2 for P, B and A with ISS 32, 16 and 23. AIS-head was 2.2, 1.3 and 1.5). Vulnerable road users are at significant risk for spine fractures. These are often associated with severe additional injuries, e.g. the head and a very high overall trauma severity (polytrauma).
Ziel dieses Projekts war es, die visuelle und akustische Wahrnehmung der Verkehrsumwelt von Radfahrern zu beschreiben, und Wahrnehmungsfehler und deren Ursachen zu identifizieren. In einer Literaturanalyse wurden die bisherigen Erkenntnisse zusammengetragen. Noch weiß man nicht viel über die visuellen und noch viel weniger über die akustischen Wahrnehmungsmechanismen und Wahrnehmungsfehler von Radfahrern, auch wenn das Thema zunehmend ins Forschungsinteresse rückt. Um herauszufinden wie viele Unfälle auf Wahrnehmungsfehler zurückgehen, und unter welchen Bedingungen sie besonders häufig auftreten, wurde eine Unfallanalyse durchgeführt. Bei 1232 Radverkehrsunfällen aus GIDAS wurden Art, Häufigkeit und mögliche (mit-)beeinflussende Faktoren von Wahrnehmungsfehlern haupt- oder alleinschuldiger Radfahrer bestimmt. So wurde bei jedem vierten Unfall ein visueller (nie ein akustischer!) Wahrnehmungsfehler des haupt-/alleinschuldigen Radfahrers in der Unfallhergangsbeschreibung berichtet. Explorativ geprüft wurde daraufhin, bei welchen Umwelt- und Fahrermerkmalen Wahrnehmungsfehler vergleichsweise häufiger auftreten als andere Fehler. Häufiger sind sie: - beim Einbiegen/Kreuzen, - an Grundstückszufahrten und Einmündungen, - bei Tage, - und bei Radfahrern unter 15 Jahren. Nicht (wesentlich) häufiger sind sie hingegen bei - schlechter Witterung, z.B. Regen und Nebel, - Radfahrern über 55 Jahren oder über 75 Jahren, - und (nicht korrigierten) Sehbeeinträchtigungen der Radfahrer. Dafür kommen verschiedene Erklärungen (z.B. Kompensationseffekte, methodische Artefakte) in Frage. Zu selten berichtet, um den Zusammenhang zu Wahrnehmungsfehlern zu prüfen wurden bspw. ablenkende Tätigkeiten (Underreporting möglich). Die oft knappen Unfallhergangsbeschreibungen erschweren die nachträgliche Identifikation von Wahrnehmungsfehlern. Ziel der Aufgabenanalyse war es, die Art der Bewältigung verschiedener Fahrsituationen durch Radfahrer zu erfassen. Der Fokus lag auf der Identifizierung typischer perzeptiver und auch kognitiver Prozesse, und der daraus resultierenden Beanspruchung in fünf auf Video aufgezeichneten Verkehrssituationen. Aufgabe der Probanden war es, laut zu denken, wo sie als Radfahrer hinschauen oder hinhören, welche Entscheidung sie treffen, wie sie handeln, von welchen Faktoren dies abhängt, und wie beanspruchend sie dies empfinden. Die Ergebnisse liefern einen Einblick in typische Wahrnehmungsmechanismen, wie z.B. den Wechsel zur gezielten Informationssuche von einer eher reizgesteuerten Aufmerksamkeit bei bestimmten Hinweisreizen, die akustische Überwachung des rückwärtigen Verkehrsraums, die erkannte Fehleranfälligkeit rein akustischer Wahrnehmung und deren Kompensation durch Kontrollblicke, auf die bei Entscheidungen unter Zeitdruck verzichtet wird. Zu Projektabschluss wurde ein Expertenworkshop durchgeführt, um Maßnahmen zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit des Radverkehrs zu diskutieren und weitere Forschungsbedarfe abzuleiten. Diskutiert wurden Maßnahmen zur Vermeidung von Wahrnehmungsfehlern bei Radfahrern aus folgenden Gründen: - Unaufmerksamkeit bzw. Ablenkung, - Unpassende Gestaltung der Verkehrsumwelt, - Eingeschränkte Kompetenz oder Bereitschaft zu sicherem Verkehrsverhalten. Die im Workshop diskutierten Maßnahmen zur Vermeidung von Wahrnehmungsfehlern setzen auf verschiedenen Ebenen (Unterstützung der Wahrnehmung, der Situationseinschätzung, der Bewusstmachung oder des Enforcements sicheren Verkehrsverhaltens) an. Weitere Forschungsbedarfe wurden aufgezeigt. Dazu gehören u.a. die Evaluation der Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen, und das Verständnis der typischen visuellen und akustischen Wahrnehmungsprozesse von Radfahrern.
Die Radfahrausbildung (RA) im vierten Schuljahr ist der wichtigste Baustein der Verkehrssicherheitsarbeit in der Schule. Ihr Stellenwert entspricht der Bedeutung, die das Fahrrad für Kinder und Jugendliche zunächst als Spielgerät, dann zunehmend als Verkehrsmittel hat. Die Verkehrsteilnahme von Kindern hat sich in den letzten Jahren jedoch stark verändert, die eigenständige Mobilität hat abgenommen. Das Fahrrad stellt zwar weiterhin ein für Kinder aller Altersgruppen wichtiges Verkehrsmittel dar, Kinder haben jedoch insbesondere in den Städten immer weniger Gelegenheit, es eigenständig zu nutzen. Auch deshalb nehmen Kinder heute mit anderen motorischen Voraussetzungen an der schulischen RA teil als früher. Im vorliegenden Forschungsprojekt war zu untersuchen, mit welchen Inhalten und Vorgehensweisen die heutige Radfahrerziehung in der Grundschule arbeitet. Andererseits war auch zu klären, wie sich individuelle Leistungsunterschiede und -schwächen von Kindern beim Beherrschen des Fahrrads empirisch erfassen lassen und von welchen individuellen, sozialen oder physischen Randmerkmalen sie vorrangig beeinflusst werden; der derzeitige Forschungsstand hierzu wurde diskutiert und bildete die Grundlage für die Planung der breit ausgelegten empirischen Erhebungen. Auf der Grundlage der Erkenntnisse sollten Vorschläge für eine künftige Radfahrausbildung in der Schule erarbeitet werden. Dazu wurden während laufender Kurse zur Radfahrausbildung Polizisten, Lehrerinnen, Eltern und Kinder (insgesamt etwa 3.000) schriftlich befragt, zusätzlich erfolgte eine bundesweit repräsentative Online-Befragung von 1.000 Eltern 8-10-jähriger Kinder. In einer weiteren Befragung von Polizeiverkehrslehrern wurde nach innovativen Modellen der motorischen Förderung gesucht, von denen 17 Polizeidienststellen, die zuständigen Klassenlehrerinnen, Eltern sowie Kindern als zweite Welle der Hauptbefragung näher untersucht wurden. Zur qualitativen Analyse der Abläufe bei der Radfahrausbildung und zur Entwicklung von Vorschlägen wurden vier Fachkonferenzen und ergänzende Interviews bundesweit durchgeführt. Die Auswertung der Befragungen zeigte, dass die Radfahrausbildung nach wie vor flächendeckend im ganzen Land durchgeführt wird, in der Regel in der Arbeitsteilung von Schule und Polizei. Allerdings gibt es auf Seiten der Polizei in den letzten Jahren Veränderungen. Die Inklusion wird zunehmend wichtiger, stößt aber bei der praktischen Radfahr-Ausbildung vor allem im Verkehrsraum an ihre Grenzen. Die von allen Beteiligten intensiv diskutierten motorischen Schwächen der Kinder beim Radfahren lassen sich anhand der erhobenen Kenngrößen (Einschätzungen von Eltern, Selbsteinschätzungen der Kinder, Ergebnisse von experimentellen Kurztests, Schulnoten) ausreichend präzise erfassen, wobei eine Fülle verschiedener Faktoren als Ursachen anzusehen sind. Allerdings ist das Thema für die Polizei wichtiger als für Lehrkräfte, die motorische Schwächen der Kinder vergleichsweise seltener erkennen. Eine vielfältige motorische Förderung gehört heute zur Praxis der Schulen, ist aber oft nicht umfassend und kontinuierlich genug. In einem Umfeld, das Bewegungserfahrungen der Kinder einschränkt, wird vermehrt eine besonders intensive Förderung angeboten, wie die Untersuchung belegt. Fast alle Kinder haben ein Kinderrad (im Mittel seit dem Alter von 3,6 Jahren), 50 % der Kinder haben vorher mit einem Laufrad gespielt. Die Laufradnutzung wirkt sich positiv auf die motorischen Fertigkeiten aus. Etwa 1/6 der Kinder hat im Umfeld der Wohnung keine Möglichkeit zum Radfahren. Der Großteil der Eltern hat mit dem Kind das Radfahren geübt, am intensivsten zwischen dem 5. und 8. Lebensjahr. Ein Drittel der Eltern hatte die Kinder dabei jedoch nicht oder nur wenig unterstützt. Die Autoren empfehlen, wegen des großen Stellenwertes der Polizei-Mitwirkung diese unbedingt zu erhalten. In Bundesländern, wo Kürzungen nicht verhindert werden können, sollte vorab versucht werden, durch Absprachen zwischen allen Beteiligten (Schule, Polizei, Elternvertreter, außerschulische Unterstützer) Erfolg und Qualität der Ausbildung langfristig zu sichern. Unabhängig davon sollte auch überlegt werden, wie Eltern in stärkerem Maße selber unterstützen können und in stärkerem Maße beteiligt werden können. Ein gewisses grundlegendes Maß an Polizeiunterstützung ist aber aus Sicht der Autoren unverzichtbar, damit das System funktionsfähig bleibt. Optimierungspotenziale werden auch bei einer intensiveren Abstimmung und Kommunikation zwischen allen Beteiligten (Kindergärten, Schulen, Polizei, Eltern), bei einer umfassenderen motorischen Förderung sowie bei der Lehrerausbildung gesehen. Eltern sollten frühzeitig schon im Kindergarten informiert werden (z. B. über den Nutzen von Laufrädern) und klare Hinweise sowie Übungsangebote erhalten, z.B. in Form von Hausaufgaben mit Bewegungsanteil oder zu Radfahrübungen.
Injury severity of e.g. pedestrians or bikers after crashes with cars that are reversing is almost unknown. However, crash victims of these injuries can frequently be seen in emergency departments and account for a large amount of patients every year. The objective of this study is to analyze injury severity of patients that were crashed into by reversing cars. The Hannover Medical School local accident research unit prospectively documented 43,000 road traffic accidents including 234 crashes involving reversing cars. Injury severity including the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the maximum abbreviated injury scale (MAIS) was analyzed as well as the location of the accident. As a result 234 accidents were included into this study. Pedestrians were injured in 141 crashes followed by 70 accidents involving bikers. The mean age of all crash victims was 57 -± 23 years. Most injuries took place on straight stretches (n = 81) as well as parking areas (n = 59), entries (n = 36) or crossroads (n = 24). The AIS of the lower extremities was highest followed by the upper extremities. The AIS of the neck was lowest. The mean MAIS was 1.3 -± 0.6. The paper concludes that the lower extremities show the highest risk to become injured during accidents with reversing cars. However, the risk of severe injuries is likely low.
The Traffic Accident Research Institute at University of Technology Dresden investigates about 1,000 accidents annually in the area around and in Dresden. These datasets have been summarized and evaluated in the GIDAS (German Accident In-Depth Study) project for 13 years. During the project it became apparent that the specific traffic situation of a covert exit of a passenger car and an intersecting two-wheeler involves a high risk potential. This critical situation develops in a large part due to the lack of visibility between the driver and the intersecting bike. In this paper the accident avoidance potential of front camera systems with lateral field of view, which allows the driver to have an indirect sight into the crossing street area will be presented.
Cycling supports the independence and health of the aging population. However, elderly cyclists have an increased injury risk. The majority of injured cyclists is victim of a single-sided accident, an accident in which there is no other party involved. The aim of the project "Safe and Aware on the bicycle" is to develop guidelines for an advisory system that is useful in preventing single-sided accidents. This system is able to support the elderly cyclist; enabling the cyclist to timely adapt his cycling behaviour and improve cycling safety and comfort. For the development of such advisory system the causes of singles accidents and the wishes of the elderly cyclist must be known. First step to obtain this insight was a literature survey and an GIDAS research. Unfortunately accidentology research with GIDAS did not give the full understanding of the pre-crash situations and (especially the behaviour related) factors leading to the accident. The second step was consultation of elderly cyclist through a questionnaire (n=800), in-depth interviews (n=12) and focus group sessions (n=15). This offered complementary information and a much better understanding of the behavioural aspects. Results concern the behaviour in traffic and identify specific physical (i.e. problems looking backwards over the shoulder) and mental issues. Furthermore, the needs and wishes for support in specific cycling situations were identified. In conclusion; The GIDAS results together with the information obtained contacting the elderly cyclists enabled setting up requirements for an advisory system, which is useful in preventing single-sided accidents.
This study aimed at comparing head Wrap Around Distance (WAD) of Vulnerable Road User (VRU) obtained from the German in-depth Accident Database (GIDAS), the China in-depth Accident Database (CIDAS) and the Japanese in-depth Accident Database (ITARDA micro). Cumulative distribution of WAD of pedestrian and cyclist were obtained for each database (AIS2+) showing that WAD of cyclists were larger than the ones of pedestrians. Comparing three regions, the 50%tile WAD of GIDAS was larger than that of both Asian accident databases. Using linear regression that might predict WAD of pedestrians and cyclists from Impact speed and VRU height, WADs were calculated to be 206cm/219cm (Pedestrian/Cyclist) for GIDAS, 170cm/192cm for CIDAS and 211cm/235cm for ITARDA. In addition, this study may be helpful for reconsideration of WAD measurement alignment between accident reconstruction and test procedures.
Within the COST Action TU1101 the working group WG 1 is dealing with acceptance criteria and problems in helmet use while bicycling concerning conspicuity, thermal stress, ventilation deficits and other potential confounding. To analyze the helmet usage practice of bicyclists in Europe a questionnaire was developed in the scope of working group 1 to collect relevant information by means of a field study. The questionnaire consists of some 66 questions covering the fields of personal data of the cyclist, riding und helmet usage habits, information concerning the helmet model and the sensation of the helmet, as well as information on previous bicycle accidents. A second complementary study is conducted to analyze if the use of a bicycle helmet influences the seating geometry and the posture of cyclists when riding a bicycle and if the if the helmet vertically limits the vision. For this purpose cyclists with and without helmets were photographed in real world situations and relevant geometrical values such as the decline of the torso, the head posture of the upper vertical vision limit due to the helmet were established from the photos. The interim results of the field studies which were conducted in Germany by the Hannover Medical School are presented in this study. Some 227 questionnaires were filled out, of which 67 participants had used a helmet and 42 of the 227 participants have had a bicycle accident before. For the analysis of the riding position and posture of the cyclist over 40 pictures of riders with a helmet and over 240 pictures of riders without a helmet were measured concerning the seating geometry to describe the influence of using a bicycle helmet. Some results in summary: From the riders interviewed with the questionnaire only 11% of the city bike riders and 12% of the mountain bike riders always used the helmet, while 38% of the racing bike riders and 88% of the e-bike-riders always used the helmet. The helmet use seems not to change the sensation of safety of cycling compared to the use of a car. The arguments for not wearing a helmet are mostly stated to be the short distance of a trip, high temperatures or carelessness and waste of time. The reasons for using a helmet are stated to be the feeling of safety and being used to using a helmet. Being a role model for others was also stated to be a reason for helmet use. Concerning the sensation of the helmet 9% of the riders reported problems with the field of vision when using a helmet, 57% saw the problem of sweating too much, and 10% reported headaches or other unpleasant symptoms like pressure on the forehead when using the helmet. The analysis of the seating posture from the pictures taken of cyclists revealed that older cyclists generally have a riding position where the handle bar is higher than the seat (0-° to 10-° incline from seat to handlebar), while younger riders had a higher variance (between -10-° decline and 20-° incline). Further, elderly riders and riders with helmets seem to have a more upright position of the upper body when cycling. The vertical vision limit due to the helmet is determined by the front rim of the helmet (mostly the sun shade). Typical values here range from 0-° (horizontal line from the eye to the sun shade) to 75-° upwards, in which elderly riders tend to have a slightly higher vertical vision limit possibly due to the helmet being worn more towards the face.
Police records about traffic accidents like used by IRTAD (International Road Traffic and Accident Database) and CARE (Community Road Accident Database) do not represent all road injuries. For instance, road accidents of bicyclists without a counterpart are usually not reported. Furthermore, IRTAD-like data contains hardly any information on injury outcome and accident circumstances. This information gap leads to an under-representation of the safety concerns of the most vulnerable road users like children and the elderly both in accident research and safety promotion. Injury registration for the European Injury Database (IDB), in turn, combines details of accident causation with diagnostic information that can be used to assess injury severity and long term consequences. The IDB is collecting data from hospital emergency department patients and is being implemented in a growing number of countries. In this article IDB results on mode of transport and injury outcome are presented from a sample of nine EU member states.
The objective of the study is to measure the risk of pedestrian and bicyclist in urban traffic through an analysis of real-world accident data. The kinematics and injury mechanisms for both pedestrian and bicyclists are investigated to find the correlation of injury risks with injury related parameters. For this purpose, firstly 338 cases are selected as a sample from an IVAC accident database based on the In-depth Investigation of Vehicle Accident in Changsha of China. A statistic measurement of the fatality and serious injury risks with respect to impact speed was carried out by logistic regression analysis. Secondly, 12 pedestrian and 12 bicyclist accidents were further selected for reconstruction with MADYMO program. A comparative analysis was conducted based on the results from accident analysis and computer reconstructions for the injury risk, head impact conditions and dynamic response of pedestrians and bicyclists. The results indicate that bicyclists suffered lower risks of severe injuries and fatalities compared with pedestrians. The risks of AIS 3+ injury and fatality are 50% for pedestrians at impact speeds of 53.2 km/h and 63.3 km/h, respectively, while that for bicyclists at 62.5 km/h and 71.1 km/h, respectively. The findings could have a contribution to get a better understanding of pedestrians" and bicyclists" exposures in urban traffic in China, and provide background knowledge to generate strategies for pedestrian protection.
Cycle helmets have continued to increase in popularity since their introduction half a century ago. Many studies indicate that overall, head injury can be significantly reduced by wearing them. This study was conducted using two distinct sets of real-world cycling collision data from Ireland, namely cases involving police collision reports and cases involving admission to a hospital emergency department. The analyses sought to simulate and analyse the protective performance of cycle helmets in such collision scenarios, by comparing the Head Injury Criterion score and peak head accelerations, both linear and angular. Cycle collisions were simulated using the specialised commercial software MADYMO. From the simulation results, these key metrics were compared between the same-scenario helmeted and unhelmeted cyclist models. Results showed that the inclusion of bicycle helmets reduced linear accelerations very significantly, but also increased angular accelerations significantly compared to unhelmeted situations. Given the modest protective performance of cycle helmets against angular accelerations, it is recommended that cycle helmet manufacturers and international test standards need to pay more attention to head angular accelerations.
A total survey of road traffic accidents involving most severely injured, defined as sustaining a polytrauma or severe monotrauma (ISS > 15) or being killed, was conducted over 14 months in a large study region in Germany. Data on injuries, pre-clinical and clinical care, crash circumstances and vehicle damage were obtained both prospectively and retrospectively from trauma centers, dispatch centers, police and fire departments. 149 patients with a polytrauma and eight with a severe monotrauma were recorded altogether. 22 patients died in hospital. Another 76 victims had deceased at the accident scene. In 2008, 49 % of patients treated with life-threatening injuries were car or van occupants, 21 % motorcyclists, 18 % cyclists and 10 % pedestrians. Among fatalities at the scene, vehicle occupants constituted an even larger portion. The number of road users with life-threatening trauma in the region was extrapolated to the German situation. It suggests that 10 % among the "seriously injured" as defined in national accident statistics are surviving accident victims with a polytrauma or severe monotrauma.
Pedestrian and cyclist are the most vulnerable road users in traffic crashes. One important aspect of this study was the comparable analysis of the exact impact configuration and the resulting injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists in view of epidemiology. The secondary aim was assessment of head injury risks and kinematics of adult pedestrian and cyclists in primary and secondary impacts and to correlate the injuries related to physical parameters like HIC value, 3ms linear acceleration, and discuss the technical parameter with injuries observed in real-world accidents based documented real accidents of GIDAS and explains the head injuries by simulated load and impact conditions based on PC-Crash and MADYMO. A subsample of n=402 pedestrians and n=940 bicyclists from GIDAS database, Germany was used for preselection, from which 22 pedestrian and 18 cyclist accidents were selected for reconstruction by initially using PC-Crash to calculate impact conditions, such as vehicle impact velocity, vehicle kinematic sequence and throw out distance. The impact conditions then were employed to identify the initial conditions in simulation of MADYMO reconstruction. The results show that cyclists always suffer lower injury outcomes for the same accident severity. Differences in HIC, head relative impact velocity, 3ms linear contiguous acceleration, maximum angular velocity and acceleration, contact force, throwing distance and head contact timing are shown. The differences of landing conditions in secondary impacts of pedestrians and cyclists are also identified. Injury risk curves were generated by logistic regression model for each predicting physical parameters.
Aim of the study was to evaluate the protective effect of bicycle helmets particularly considering injuries to the head and to the face. Accidents with the participation of bicyclists which occurred from 2000 to 2007 were chosen from GIDAS. We observed that injuries to the head and face were more severe in the group of non-helmeted riders. There seems to be no significant difference in injuries with AIS 3-6. Altogether 26 cyclists were killed. 2 of them wore a helmet (1% of helmeted cyclists), 24 did not (1% of non-helmeted cyclists). Only one killed rider (without helmet) did not suffer from polytrauma (only head injuries recorded). The findings seem to support the thesis of a preventive effect of the bicycle helmet, however the two groups are different in their characteristics related to riding speed. Necessarily we need a multivariate model to evaluate the effect of helmets.
The purpose of this study was to analyse the actual injury situation of bicyclists regarding accidents involving more than one bicyclist. Bicyclists were included in a medical and technical analysis to create a basis for preventive measures and discovered repeating accident patterns and circumstances such as daytime, environment, helmet use rate. Technical and medical data were collected at the scene, shortly after accident. The population was compared focusing on bicycle versus bicycle accidents. Technical analysis included speed at crash, type of collision, impact angle, environment, used lane and relative velocity. Medical analysis included injury pattern and severity (AIS, ISS). Included were 578 injured bicyclists in 289 accidents from years 1999 to 2008, 61 percent were male (n=350) and 39 percent female (n=228). Sixty-seven percent ranged between 18 to 64 years of age, twelve percent each between 13 to 17 years of age and older than 65 years, eight percent between 6 to 12 years and one percent between 2 to 5 years.. Crashes took place in urban areas in 92 percent, in rural areas in 8 percent. Weather conditions were dry lanes in 97 percent and wet conditions in 3 percent. Eighty-three percent of all accidents happened during daytime, ten percent during night, and seven percent during dawn. The helmet use rate was only 7,5 percent in all involved bicyclists. The mean Maximum Abbreviated injury scale, Injury severity score was 1,31. Bicyclists are still minimally- or unprotected road users. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. The incidence of bicycle to bicycle crashes is high. Most of these accidents take place in urban areas. The level and pattern of injuries is moderate. Most of the more severe injuries occur to the head and could have been avoided by frequent helmet use.
An increased use of bicycles comes along with an increased number of bicycle accidents. Bicycle accidents are more frequent than recorded by the police. To evaluate the real number of bicycle accidents during 12 months in Münster, Germany, injuries were collected by the Police and in each emergency unit anonymously. 2,153 patients had to be treated in a hospital, nearly triple the number of accidents that were registered by the police. Beside fractures of the upper extremities with major surgery, traumatic brain injuries were the leading cause for hospital admission. Bicycle helmet use can reduce traumatic brain injuries and the related number of deaths and hospital admissions. Laws on bicycle helmet might decrease the use of bicycles and therefore the reduction of positive health benefits. Other methods of accident prevention may lead to positive effects as helmet legislation as well, while having no reduction in bicycle use.
The bicyclist accidents were analyzed to get better understanding of the occurrences and frequency of the accidents, injury distributions, as well as correlation of injury severity/outcomes with engineering and human factors in two different countries of China and Germany. The accident cases that occurred from 2001 to 2006 were collected from IVAC database in Changsha and GIDAS database in Hannover. Based on specified sampling criteria, 1,570 bicyclist cases were selected from IVAC database in Changsha, and 1806 cases were collected from Hannover, documented in GIDAS database. Statistical analyses were carried out by using these selected data. The results from the statistical analysis are presented and discussed in this study.