Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (101)
- Buch (Monographie) (20)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (4)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Schlagworte
- Injury (126) (entfernen)
Institut
The incidence of side impacts was investigated from GIDAS data. Both vehicle-fixed object and vehicle-vehicle collisions were analysed as these are enclosed within the consumer testing program. Vehicle-fixed object collisions were stratified according to ESC availability. Results indicated that vehicles equipped with ESC rarely have pure-lateral impacts. An increase in oblique collisions was seen for the vehicles with ESC whereby most vehicle were driving in left curves. The analysis of vehicle-vehicle collisions developed injury risk curves were developed at the AIS3+ injury severity for the vehicle-vehicle side impacts. Results suggested that greatest injury risk occurred when a Pre Euro NCAP vehicle was struck by a Post Euro-NCAP vehicle. The remaining curves did not show different behaviour, indicating that stiffness increased have been equally combated. This was attributable to the few Post Euro-NCAP vehicles that had a deployed curtain airbag available in the sample. The integration of Euro NCAP testing has shown to improve vehicle crashworthiness for pole collisions, as those vehicles with ESC rarely incur lateral impacts.
Car occupants have a high level of mortality in road accidents, since passenger cars are the prevalent mode of transport. In 2013, car occupant fatalities accounted for 45% of all road accident fatalities in the EU. The objective of this research is the analysis of basic road safety parameters related to car occupants in the European countries over a period of 10 years (2004-2013), through the exploitation of the EU CARE database with disaggregate data on road accidents. Data from the EU Injury Database for the period 2005 - 2008 are used to identify injury patterns, and additional insight into accident causation for car occupants is offered through the use of in-depth accident data from the EC SafetyNet project Accident Causation System (SNACS). The results of the analysis allow for a better understanding of the car occupants' safety situation in Europe, thus providing useful support to decision makers working for the improvement of road safety level in Europe.
To elucidate the risk of pedestrians, bicycle and motorbike users, data of two accident research units from 1999 to 2014 were analysed in regard to demographic data, collision details, preclinical and clinical data using SPSS. 14.295 injured vulnerable road users were included. 92 out of 3610 pedestrians ("P", 2.5%), 90 out of 8307 bicyclists ("B", 1.1%) and 115 out of 4094 motorcycle users ("M", 2.8%) were diagnosed with spinal fractures. Thoracic fractures were most frequent ahead of lumbar and cervical fractures. Car collisions were most frequent mechanism (68, 62 and 36%). MAIS was 3.8, 2.8 and 3.2 for P, B and A with ISS 32, 16 and 23. AIS-head was 2.2, 1.3 and 1.5). Vulnerable road users are at significant risk for spine fractures. These are often associated with severe additional injuries, e.g. the head and a very high overall trauma severity (polytrauma).
In this study, we compared the injury severity of occupants according to the seating position and the crashing direction in motor vehicle accidents. In the driver's point of view, it was separated the seating position as "Near-side" and "Far-side". The study subjects were targeted by people who visited 4 regional emergency centers following motor vehicle accidents. Real-world investigation was performed by direct and indirect methods after patient- consent. The information of the damaged vehicle was informed by Collision Deformation Classification (CDC) code and the information of the injury of patients was informed by using the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS). When the column 3 in CDC code was P, damaged at the middle part of lateral side, the average point of AIS 3 was 1.91-±1.72 in near-side and 1.02-±1.31 in far-side (p<0.01). The average point of maximum AIS (MAIS) was 2.78-±1.39 in near-side and 2.02-±1.11 in far-side (p<0.01). The average point of ISS was 15.74-±14.71 in near-side and 8.11-±8.39 in far-side (p<0.01). Also, when the column 3 in CDC code was D, damaged at the whole part of lateral side, it was significant that the average point of AIS 3 and MAIS in near-side was bigger than in far-side (p=0.02).
Injury probability functions for pedestrians and bicyclists based on real-world accident data
(2017)
The paper is focusing on the modelling of injury severity probabilities, often called as Injury Risk Functions (IRF). These are mathematical functions describing the probability for a defined population and for possible explanatory factors (variables) to sustain a certain injury severity. Injury risk functions are becoming more and more important as basis for the assessment of automotive safety systems. They contribute to the understanding of injury mechanisms, (prospective) evaluation of safety systems and definition of protection criteria or are used within regulation and/or consumer ratings. In all cases, knowledge about the correlation between mechanical behavior and injury severity is needed. IRFs are often based on biomechanical data. This paper is focusing on the derivation of injury probability models from real world accident data of the GIDAS database (German In-depth Accident Study). In contrast to most academic terms there is no explicit term definition or definition of creation processes existing for injury probability models based on empirical data. Different approaches are existing for such kind of models in the field of accident research. There is a need for harmonization in terms of the used methods and data as well as the handling with the existing challenges. These are preparation of the dataset, model assumptions, censored/unknown data, evaluation of model accuracy, definition of dependent and independent variable, and others. In the presented study, several empirical, statistical and phenomenological approaches were analyzed regarding their advantages and disadvantages and also their applicability. Furthermore, the identification of appropriate prediction parameters for the injury severity of pedestrians has been considered. Due to its main effect on injuries of pedestrians and bicyclists, the importance of the secondary impact has also been analyzed. Finally, the model accuracy, evaluated by several criteria, is the rating factor that gives the quality and reliability for application of the resulting models. After the investigation and evaluation of statistical approaches one method was chosen and appropriate prediction variables were examined. Finally, all findings were summarized and injury risk functions for pedestrians in real world accidents were created. Additionally, the paper gives instructions for the interpretation and usage of such functions. The presented results include IRFs for several injury severity levels and age groups. The presented models are based on a high amount of real world accidents and describe very well the injury severity probability of pedestrians and bicyclists in frontal collisions with current vehicles. The functions can serve as basis for the evaluation of effectiveness of systems like Pedestrian-AEB or Bicycle-AEB.
In most of developed countries, the progress made in passive safety during the last three decades allowed to drastically reduce the number of killed and severely injured especially for occupants of passenger cars. This reduction is mainly observed for frontal impacts for which the AIS3+ injuries has been reduced about 52% for drivers and 38% for front passengers. The stiffening of the cars' structure coupled with the generalization of airbags and the improvement of the seatbelt restraint (load limiter, pretension, etc.) allowed to protect vital body regions such as head, neck and thorax. However, the abdomen did not take advantage with so much success of this progress. The objective of this study is to draw up an inventory on the abdominal injuries of the belted car occupants involved in frontal impact, to present adapted counter-measures and to assess their potential effectiveness. In the first part the stakes corresponding to the abdominal injuries will be defined according to types of impact, seat location, occupants' age and type of injured organs. Then, we shall focus on the abdominal injury risk curves for adults involved in frontal impact and on the comparisons of the average risks according to the seat location. In the second part we will list counter-measures and we shall calculate their effectiveness. The method of case control will be used in order to estimate odds ratio, comparing two samples, given by occupants having or not having the studied safety system. For this study, two type of data sources are used: national road injured accident census and retrospective in-depth accident data collection. Abdominal injuries are mainly observed in frontal impact (52%). Fatal or severe abdominal occupant- injuries are observed at least in 27% of cases, ranking this body region as the most injured just after the thorax (51%). In spite of a twice lower occupation rate in the back seats compared to the front seats, the number of persons sustaining abdominal injuries at the rear place is higher than in the front place. In recent cars, the risk of having a serious or fatal abdominal injury in a frontal impact is 1.6% for the driver, 3.6% for the front passenger and 6.3% for the rear occupants. The most frequently hurt organs are the small intestine (17%), the spleen (16%) and the liver (13%). The most common countermeasures have a good efficiency in the reduction of the abdominal injuries for the adults: the stiffness of the structure of the seats allows decreasing the abdominal injury risk from 54% (driver) to 60% (front occupant), the seatbelt pretensioners decrease also this risk from 90% (driver) to 83% (front passenger).
Supported by field accident data and monitoring results of European Regulation (EC) No. 78/2009, recent plans of the European Commission regarding a way forward to improve passive safety of vulnerable road users include, amongst other things, an extension of the head test area. The inclusion of passive cyclist safety is also being considered by Euro NCAP. Although passenger car to cyclist collisions are often severe and have a significant share within the accident statistics, cyclists are neither considered sufficiently in the legislative nor in the consumer ratings tests. Therefore, a test procedure to assess the protection potential of vehicle fronts in a collision with cyclists has been developed within a current research project. For this purpose, the existing pedestrian head impact test procedures were modified in order to include boundary conditions relevant for cyclists as the second big group of vulnerable road users. Based on an in-depth analysis of passenger car to cyclist accidents in Germany the three most representative accident constellations have been initially defined. The development of the test procedure itself was based on corresponding simulations with representative vehicle and bicycle models. In addition to different cyclist heights, reaching from a 6-year-old child to a 95%-male, also four pedal positions were considered. By reconstruction of a real accident the defined simulation parameters could be validated in advance. The conducted accident kinematics analysis shows for a large portion of the constellations an increased head impact area, which can reach beyond the roof leading edge, as well as high average values for head impact velocity and angle. Based on the simulation data obtained for the different vehicle models, cyclist-specific test parameters for impactor tests have been derived, which have been further examined in the course of head and leg impact tests. In order to study the cyclist accident kinematics under real test conditions, different full scale tests with a Polar-II dummy positioned on a bicycle have been conducted. Overall, the tests showed a good correlation with the simulations and support the defined boundary test conditions. Typical accident scenarios and simulations reveal higher head impact locations, angles and velocities. An extended head impact area with modified test parameters will contribute to an improved protection of vulnerable road users including cyclists. However, due to significantly differing impact kinematics and postures between the lower extremities of pedestrians and cyclists, these injuries cannot be addressed by the means of current test tools such as the flexible pedestrian legform impactor FlexPLI. Based on the findings obtained within the project as well as the existing pedestrian protection requirements a cyclist protection test procedure for use in legislation and consumer test programmes has been developed, whose requirements have been transferred into a corresponding test specification. This specification provides common head test boundary conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, whereby the existing requirements are modified and two parallel test procedures are avoided.
Die Elektromobilität ist nicht erst seit dem Nationalen Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität der Bundesregierung, der u.a. als Zielsetzung hat, dass eine Million Elektrofahrzeuge bis 2020 auf deutschen Straßen fahren sollen, ein allgegenwärtiges Thema. Eine zu lösende Aufgabe auf dem Weg zu diesem Ziel ist die Betrachtung der Abhängigkeiten der Systeme Elektrofahrzeug, Ladeverbindungseinheit und Ladesystem, welche bisher weitgehend autonom normiert sind. Um Personen- und Sachschäden beim Laden von Fahrzeugen zu vermeiden, ist es möglicherweise erforderlich, Anforderungen an die Sicherheit dieses Gesamtsystems zu definieren. Zu diesem Zweck beauftragte die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen die SGS-TÜV Saar GmbH, Competence Center Funktionale Sicherheit mit der Durchführung einer Risikoanalyse, mit dem Ziel die Sicherheitsaspekte beim Laden eines Elektrofahrzeuges zu untersuchen. Bisher nicht bzw. unzureichend betrachtete Gefährdungen während des Ladevorganges sollten aufgezeigt werden. Nötige Maßnahmen sollten definiert und punktuell mittels Tests validiert werden, um identifizierte Risiken auf ein ausreichend geringes Maß zu senken. Im Kern wurde untersucht, welche potenziellen Risiken (Das Risiko definiert sich als die Beschreibung eines Ereignisses mit der Möglichkeit negativer Auswirkungen. Das Risiko wird allgemein als Produkt aus Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit eines Ereignisses und dessen Konsequenz angesehen. (Quelle: Wikipedia)) beim Laden eines Elektrofahrzeugs auftreten. Auf Basis einer Normenrecherche wurde die Frage beantwortet, an welchen Stellen normativer und gesetzlicher Handlungsbedarf besteht. Dazu wurden die nachfolgenden Schwerpunkte erarbeitet: - Darstellung möglicher sicherheitskritischer Bedingungen beim Laden; - Zuordnung der sicherheitskritischen Bedingungen zu den Subsystemen Infrastruktur, Kabel und Fahrzeug; - Definition von Maßnahmen zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit beim Laden; - Aufzeigen der Zuständigkeiten für die Gewährleistung der Sicherheit; - Offenlegung des regelungsseitigen Bedarfs. Im ersten Schritt wurde eine Risikoanalyse durchgeführt, um die potenziellen Risiken beim Laden eines Elektrofahrzeugs aufzuzeigen. Die Risikoanalyse wurde zunächst ohne Berücksichtigung bereits normativ oder gesetzlich festgelegter Schutzmaßnahmen durchgeführt. Anschließend erfolgte eine iterative Weiterführung der Betrachtung der Risiken in zweierlei Hinsicht: a) Berücksichtigung existierender normativer und/ oder gesetzlicher Anforderungen, welche parallel zur Risikoanalyse recherchiert wurden; b) Beschreibung ergänzender technischer und/ oder organisatorischer Maßnahmen, um nicht abgedeckte Risiken weiter zu reduzieren. Danach wurde eine erneute Beurteilung der Risiken vorgenommen, um aufzuzeigen, ob die vorhandenen bzw. neu definierten Maßnahmen in der Lage sind, das identifizierte Risiko in ausreichendem Maß zu reduzieren. Generell zeigte sich im Rahmen der Risikoanalyse eine breite, durch Normen und Richtlinien bzw. gesetzlichen Regelungen, vorhandene Abdeckung der möglichen Risiken. Derzeit nicht abgedeckte Risiken konnten adressiert und wirksame Lösungsmöglichkeiten vorgeschlagen werden. Bei Umsetzung aller aufgezeigten Lösungsansätze bleiben somit keine relevanten Risiken offen. Jedoch zeigt sich auch, dass zu bestimmten Themen dringender Handlungsbedarf besteht. Als Ergebnis ließ sich zu folgenden Punkten ein konkreter Handlungsbedarf ableiten: - Als eines der Hauptrisiken wurde das Laden an einer haushaltsüblichen Schukosteckdose, ohne die Nutzung einer zusätzlichen in der Ladeleitung integrierten Schutzeinrichtung, identifiziert. Bei Ladeleitungen mit Schutzeinrichtung hängt deren Schutzwirkung nicht zuletzt von einer regelmäßigen technischen Überprüfung ab; - Als relevant wurden weiterhin die elektromagnetischen Felder, die von einer Ladeleitung bei hohen Strömen ausgehen (zukünftige Schnellladesysteme), identifiziert, hier sind tiefergehende Untersuchungen erforderlich; Im Sinne der Risikominimierung sollte auch das maximal zulässige Gewicht der Ladegarnitur limitiert sein; - Auch Risiken, die sich durch die Bedienung ergeben, wurden untersucht. Mit entsprechenden Hinweisen im Bedienungshandbuch des Elektrofahrzeuges kann hier bereits einigen möglichen Gefahren begegnet werden. Dies betrifft unter anderem die Handhabung der Ladegarnitur beim Laden im öffentlichen Raum. Aus den ermittelten, noch umzusetzenden Maßnahmen geht hervor, dass der derzeitige Stand der Normung und gesetzlichen Regelungen noch nicht vollkommen ausreichend ist, um alle ermittelten und aufgezeigten Risiken in ausreichendem Maße zu reduzieren. Aus den Ergebnissen der Studie wird aber auch deutlich, dass die Sicherheit nicht alleine von einem Teilsystem alleine, sondern vielmehr durch das sichere Zusammenwirken aller Teile, auch in Kombination mit dem Verhalten der Nutzer und partizipierender Personen, gewährleistet wird.
In line with the new definition introduced by the European Commission (EC), the number of seriously injured road casualties in Germany for 2014 is assessed in this study. The number of MAIS3+ casualties is estimated by two different methodological approaches. The first approach is based on data from the German Inâ€Depth Accident Study (GIDAS), which is closely related to the German Road Traffic Accident Statistics. The second approach is based on data from the German TraumaRegister DGU-® (TRâ€DGU), which includes many more hospitals but not all MAIS3+ injuries.
Die Feststellung empirisch belegten Alkoholkonsums bei Kindern und Jugendlichen, aber nur rudimentärer Dokumentation entsprechender Verkehrsunfälle begründete die vorliegende Untersuchung. Qualitative mündliche Befragungen von Experten und Jugendlichen, Feldbeobachtungen und quantitative schriftliche Befragungen von Jugendlichen führten zu folgenden Ergebnissen: Etwa 65 % der schriftlich befragten 12- bis 22-Jährigen waren vor dem 18. Lebensjahr mindestens einmal im Monat übermäßig alkoholisiert mobil. Mit durchschnittlich 15 Jahren findet nicht nur der erste übermäßige Alkoholkonsum statt, sondern auch die ersten Situationen alkoholisierter Mobilität, vorrangig bei männlichen Jugendlichen. Wenngleich nur rd. 5 % der Befragten eine erlebte gefährliche Verkehrssituation als "echten" Verkehrsunfall bezeichneten, verwiesen immerhin etwa 27 % auf mindestens eine gefährliche Verkehrssituation unter Alkoholeinfluss vor dem 18. Lebensjahr. Von den insgesamt 349 berichteten gefährlichen Verkehrssituationen gingen 113 mit leichten und 24 mit schweren Verletzungen einher. Aber auch die Nichtverletzten verwiesen auf zahlreiche erlebte Gefahren bei ihrer Mobilität unter Alkoholeinfluss. Vorrangig männliche Jugendliche erleben solche Situationen mit durchschnittlich 15,7 Jahren. In mehr als der Hälfte der gefährlichen Verkehrssituationen unter Alkoholeinfluss waren die Akteure alleine unterwegs. Die alkoholisierten Kinder und Jugendlichen verunfallten zumeist als Fahrradfahrer und Fußgänger. In rd. 40 % der Fälle erfolgte eine medizinische Versorgung, von nur rd. 20% dieser Alkoholunfälle erlangt die Polizei Kenntnis. Unterstrichen wird die Notwendigkeit weiterer, differenzierender Untersuchungen, um die explorativ gewonnenen Erkenntnisse zu verifizieren und geeignete Präventionsmaßnahmen zu begründen. Inhaltlich und aufwandsökonomisch wird die ressortübergreifende Zusammenarbeit mit der Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung empfohlen.