Sonstige
Der Allgemeine Deutsche Automobil-Club e.V. (ADAC) und die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) veranstalteten am 13. Oktober 2006 in Baden-Baden das 6. Symposium "Sicher fahren in Europa". Die Fachvorträge befassten sich mit den Themenbereichen: Ansätze zu mehr Verkehrssicherheit, - Verbesserung der Fahrzeugsicherheit, - Besondere Zielgruppen. Die CD-ROM dokumentiert die Grußworte, die Referate und die Podiumsdiskussion.
Außerortsstraßen sind in Deutschland im Vergleich zu Innerortsstraßen oder Autobahnen durch eine besonders hohe Unfallschwere gekennzeichnet. Maßgebende Faktoren dafür sind zum einen eine sehr hohe und oft nicht hinreichend angepasste Geschwindigkeit und zum anderen Fehleinschätzungen von Geschwindigkeiten bzw. Geschwindigkeitsdifferenzen entgegenkommender und vorausfahrender Fahrzeuge. Mit der Aufgabe der Erarbeitung kurz- und mittelfristig umsetzbarer Maßnahmen zur Erhöhung der Verkehrssicherheit auf Landstraßen wurde durch die BASt im Auftrag des BMVBS die Projektgruppe ("AOSI" " Außerortsstraßensicherheit) gegründet. Die entwickelten Maßnahmen sollten in einem bundesweiten Großversuch umgesetzt, getestet und bewertet werden. Für die Durchsetzung der zulässigen Höchstgeschwindigkeit wurden linienhaft angeordnete ortsfeste Geschwindigkeitsüberwachungsanlagen (OGUE) empfohlen. Die Sicherung von Überholvorgängen sollte durch abschnittsweise angelegte Überholfahrstreifen (UEFS) in Kombination mit Überholverboten (UEV) in den verbleibenden zweistreifigen Zwischenabschnitten erfolgen. Je Untersuchungsstrecke wurde entweder die zulässige Höchstgeschwindigkeit durchgesetzt oder das Überholen gesichert. Eine Kombination beider Maßnahmen erfolgte nicht. In einem Vorher/Nachher-Vergleich wurden die Wirkungen dieser Maßnahmen auf das Unfallgeschehen und den Verkehrsablauf untersucht. Ergänzend wurde die Akzeptanz der Maßnahmen durch Befragungen an den Untersuchungsstrecken erhoben. Durch den Einsatz von OGUE konnte die Verkehrssicherheit deutlich erhöht werden. Der Sicherheitsgewinn war auf denjenigen Untersuchungsstrecken besonders hoch, auf denen das Unfallgeschehen vorwiegend auf unangepasste und zu hohe Geschwindigkeiten im Vorher-Zeitraum zurückzuführen war. Es konnte nachgewiesen werden, dass durch den OGUE-Einsatz eine Harmonisierung der Geschwindigkeiten auf der Höhe der zulässigen Geschwindigkeit stattfindet. Die Entwicklung hin zu geringeren Geschwindigkeitsdifferenzen zwischen den Fahrzeugen hatte neben der Reduktion der Fahrunfälle, auf Untersuchungsstrecken mit einer gestreckten Linienführung, auch zu einer deutlichen Reduktion der Unfälle im Längsverkehr geführt. Der Einsatz der OGUE wird von den Verkehrsteilnehmern akzeptiert, wenn die Gründe für sie nachvollziehbar sind. Die Ankündigung der Geschwindigkeitsüberwachung über eine auffällige örtliche Beschilderung hat sich als akzeptanzfördernd herausgestellt. Die Sicherung von Überholvorgängen durch zusätzliche Überholfahrstreifen (UEFS) und Überholverbot (UEV) in den angrenzenden zweistreifigen Abschnitten führte auf den Untersuchungsstrecken zu einer Erhöhung der Verkehrssicherheit. Besonders die Entwicklung hin zu einer geringeren Unfallschwere und einer deutlichen Reduktion der Überholunfälle konnte festgestellt werden. Die Analysen des Verkehrsablaufes zeigten, dass bereits kurze Überholfahrstreifen mit Längen von nur 600 m und 700 m effektiv zum Abbau von Überholdruck beitragen können. Diese Strecken sind platzsparend und somit besonders für das Bestandsnetz zum "Nachrüsten" geeignet. Die Akzeptanz der Verkehrsteilnehmer für dieses Maßnahmepaket (UEFS/UEV) war besonders groß. Überholverbotsabschnitte zwischen den UEFS sollten jedoch vier Kilometer nicht überschreiten. Fazit: Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die im AOSI-Projekt entwickelten und kurz- und mittelfristig umsetzbaren Maßnahmen zu einer wirksamen Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit auf Landstraßen beitragen, wenn das Unfallgeschehen nachweislich auf eine zu hohe und oft nicht angepasste Geschwindigkeit oder auf Unfälle im Längsverkehr im Zuge von Überholvorgängen zurückzuführen ist.
The role of a national motor vehicle crash causation study-style data set in rollover data analysis
(2010)
On 1 January 2005, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, an agency of the United States Department of Transportation, implemented a new data collection strategy designed to assess crash avoidance technologies and report associated behavioral inputs and outcomes. The original goal was a six-year program, however, during the shortened data collection period; it proved a valuable resource for understanding a precrash environment previously obscured by forensic case investigation. Another unintended consequence was an overlap with infrastructure, roadway geometry, and design with the occupant and vehicle outcomes, by virtue of well-defined attributes. External to the collected data, supplementary information was extrapolated, by using manuals published in the United States, by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials and selected State Departments of Transportation, in conjunction with the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Study (NMVCCS). This provided a backdrop to the infrastructure framework of the rollover problem within which the occupant and vehicle outcomes were studied. If a NMVCCS-style data collection were to be implemented elsewhere, then complementary manuals produced by federal transportation officials might be consulted producing similar relationships. The current study uses NMVCCS data to describe vehicles travelling through diverse design geometries and the outcome for occupants involved in crashes within that system. Codified and extrapolated data form the basis for assessing NMVCCS and its value to the transportation safety community, as the protocols are applicable universally. The benefit in continuing a NMVCCS-style study is noted, as the interaction of roadway infrastructure and occupant protection agencies might find paths to better work together in solving the complex rollover problem using a common data-driven approach.
Estimation of the benefits for the UK for potential options to modify UNECE Regulation No. 95
(2010)
The side impact problem in Europe remains substantial. UK data shows that between 22% and 26% of car occupant casualties are involved in a side impact, but this rises to between 29% and 38% for those who are fatally injured. This indicates the more injurious nature of side impacts compared with frontal impacts. The European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) has performed work to address the side impact issue since 1979. As part of its continuing work, it has recently investigated potential options for regulatory changes to improve side impact protection in cars further. To support this work the UK undertook an analysis to estimate the benefit for potential options to modify UNECE Regulation 95. The analysis used the UK national STATS19 and detailed Co-operative Crash Injury Study (CCIS) accident databases. Of the potential options reviewed, it was found that the addition of a pole test offered the greatest benefit.
Accident data shows that the vast majority of pedestrian accidents involve a passenger car. A refined method for estimating the potential effectiveness of a technology designed to support the car driver in mitigating or avoiding pedestrian accidents is presented. The basis of the benefit prediction method consists of accident scenario information for pedestrian-passenger car accidents from GIDAS, including vehicle and pedestrian velocities. These real world pedestrian accidents were first reconstructed and the system effectiveness was determined by comparing injury outcome with and without the functionality enabled for each accident. The predictions from Volvo Cars" general Benefit Estimation Model are refined by including the actual system algorithm and sensing models for a relevant car in the simulation environment. The feasibility of the method is proven by a case study on a authentic technology; the Auto Brake functionality in Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake and Pedestrian Detection (CWAB-PD). Assuming the system is adopted by all vehicles, the Case Study indicates a 24% reduction in pedestrian fatalities for crashes where the pedestrians were struck by the front of a passenger car.
In a first step, we have examined approximately 23 000 single vehicle accidents within the Austrian National Statistics database. In a second step, we considered 15% of all fatal "running off the road" accidents that occurred in Austria in 2003. As a result, two accident categories were specified; "leaving the road without preceding manoeuvre" and "leaving the road with preceding manoeuvre". These two categories can be basically characterised by the vehicle- heading angle and its velocity angle. In this report, we further suggest theoretical approaches for the dimensioning of a safety zone, an area adjacent to the road free of fixed objects or dangerous slopes. We also show the link between the two accident categories mentioned above and the real world accidents analysed in detail. These observations also form the basis for the required length for safety devices. Finally, we summarise accident avoidance strategies.
Over the last decades the number of traffic accident fatalities on German roads decreased by 77% down to 4968 in the year 2007. This positive development is due to optimisations of vehicle safety, roads and infrastructure and medical rescue issues. Up to now mostly the optimisations of secondary safety measures lead to this effect on vehicle safety. Since some years more and more driver assistance systems are available and lead to a further reduction of all accidents. These new systems are often comfort systems and have not primarily been developed to increase vehicle safety. In contrast to secondary safety systems primary safety systems are able to mitigate and avoid accidents. So in the future it is important to estimate the benefit of these systems in reducing accident numbers as well. Current benefit estimation methods mostly focus on a single system only and not on the combination of systems. In this paper a new method for a multivariate benefit estimation based on real accident data is developed. The paper describes the basic method to estimate the benefit of primary and secondary safety systems in combination. With the presented method the benefit will not be overestimated as it would be by a simple addition of the benefits of single systems. The model will be validated by a multivariate prospective benefit estimation of different vehicle safety systems in comparison to single benefit estimations of the same systems. For this the German In-Depth Accident Database is used. The results show the importance to implement the interactions of safety systems in the estimation process and rate the overestimation by a simple addition of the single system benefits. The validation includes primary and secondary safety systems in combination. The validation is done using more than 3500 real accidents which were initiated by cars. This sample out of the GIDAS database is representative for the current accident situation in Germany. The paper shows the necessity of a multivariate estimation of the benefit for existing and future safety systems.
A set of recommendations for pan-European transparent and independent road accident investigations has been developed by the SafetyNet project. The aim of these recommendations is to pave the way for future EU scale accident investigation activities by setting out the necessary steps for establishing safety oriented road accident investigations in Member States. This can be seen as the start of the process for establishing road accident investigations throughout Europe which operate according to a common methodology. The recommendations propose a European Safety Oriented Road Accident Investigation Programme which sets out the procedures that need to be put in place to investigate a sample of every day road accidents. They address four sets of issues; institutional addressing the characteristics of the programme; operational describing the conditions under which data isrncollected; data storage and protection; and reports, countermeasures and the dissemination of data.rn
Methods for analyzing the efficiency of primary safety measures based on real life accident data
(2009)
Primary safety measures are designed to help to avoid accidents or, if this is not possible, to stabilize respectively reduce the dynamics of the vehicle to such an extent that the secondary safety measures are able to act as good as possible. The efficiency of a primary safety measure is a criterion for the effectiveness, with which a system of primary safety succeeds in avoiding or mitigation the severity of accidents within its range of operation and in interactionwith driver and vehicle. Based on Daimler-´s philosophy of the "Real Life Safety" the reflection of the real world accidents in the systems range of operation is both starting point as well as benchmark for its optimization. This paper deals with the methodology to perform assessments of statistical representative efficiency of primary safety measures. To be able to carry out an investigation concerning the efficiency of a primary safety measure in a transparent and comparable way basic definitions and systematics were introduced. Based on these definitions different systematic methods for estimating efficiency were discussed and related to each other. The paper is completed by presenting an example for estimating the efficiency of actual "single" and "multi" connected primary safety systems.
In the last years various new driver information and driver assistance systems made their way into modern vehicles and there are yet countless systems underway. However, expenses for both, the development and the construction of these systems are tremendous. Therefore the interest of evaluating systems keeps growing steadily, not only regarding the results of systems developed in the last years but also regarding system ideas. Only if at least a rough benefit estimation is given, the industry can decide which development should be supported. However, there is still a lack of transparency of possible and useful methods for these kinds of estimations. These were analyses and structured in this study.