Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (106) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Anfahrversuch (37)
- Safety (35)
- Impact test (veh) (34)
- Sicherheit (34)
- Bewertung (30)
- Conference (29)
- Evaluation (assessment) (29)
- Konferenz (29)
- Fahrzeug (26)
- Test method (25)
- Vehicle (25)
- Prüfverfahren (24)
- Dummy (20)
- Fußgänger (20)
- Pedestrian (20)
- Accident (19)
- Unfall (19)
- Anthropometric dummy (18)
- Verletzung (18)
- Deutschland (17)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (17)
- Germany (17)
- Injury (17)
- Collision (16)
- Head on collision (16)
- Simulation (16)
- Kompatibilität (15)
- Compatibility (14)
- Driver assistance system (14)
- Versuch (14)
- Zusammenstoß (14)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (13)
- Test (13)
- Analyse (math) (12)
- Analysis (math) (12)
- Biomechanics (11)
- Biomechanik (11)
- Europa (11)
- Europe (11)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (10)
- injury) (10)
- Car (9)
- Child (9)
- Head (9)
- Kind (9)
- Kopf (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (9)
- Severity (accid, injury) (9)
- Side impact (9)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (9)
- Verletzung) (9)
- Bemessung (8)
- Cyclist (8)
- Design (overall design) (8)
- Forschungsarbeit (8)
- Method (8)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (8)
- Research project (8)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (8)
- Severity (accid (8)
- Vehicle regulations (8)
- Verfahren (8)
- Automatic (7)
- Automatisch (7)
- Driver (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (7)
- Improvement (7)
- Insasse (7)
- Interior (veh) (7)
- Passive safety system (7)
- Standardisierung (7)
- Vehicle occupant (7)
- Verbesserung (7)
- Active safety system (6)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (6)
- Brustkorb (6)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (6)
- Gesetzgebung (6)
- Knee (human) (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Perception (6)
- Pkw (6)
- Schlag (6)
- Shock (6)
- Thorax (6)
- Unfallverhütung (6)
- Wahrnehmung (6)
- Accident prevention (5)
- Autonomes Fahren (5)
- Autonomous driving (5)
- Behaviour (5)
- Braking (5)
- Bremsung (5)
- Cost benefit analysis (5)
- Datenbank (5)
- Deformation (5)
- Development (5)
- Driver information (5)
- Entwicklung (5)
- Fahrerinformation (5)
- Fatality (5)
- Forschungsbericht (5)
- Impact test (5)
- Lkw (5)
- Lorry (5)
- Research report (5)
- Standardization (5)
- Tödlicher Unfall (5)
- Verhalten (5)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (5)
- Alte Leute (4)
- Aufprallschlitten (4)
- Database (4)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (4)
- Fahrstabilität (4)
- Impact sled (4)
- Knie (menschl) (4)
- Leg (human) (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Measurement (4)
- Messung (4)
- Modification (4)
- Motorcycle (4)
- Motorrad (4)
- Prevention (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Statistics (4)
- Statistik (4)
- Technologie (4)
- Technology (4)
- Vehicle handling (4)
- Verformung (4)
- Airbag (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Belastung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Body (car) (3)
- Collision avoidance system (3)
- Communication (3)
- EU (3)
- Efficiency (3)
- Empfindlichkeit (3)
- Ergonomics (3)
- Error (3)
- Fahrzeugführung (3)
- Fahrzeugsitz (3)
- Fehler (3)
- Front (3)
- Gewicht (3)
- Halswirbel (3)
- Human body (3)
- Intelligent transport system (3)
- Karosserie (3)
- Kommunikation (3)
- Kraftfahrzeug (3)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (3)
- Load (3)
- Mathematical model (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Motorcyclist (3)
- Motorradfahrer (3)
- Official approval (3)
- Old people (3)
- Reaction (human) (3)
- Reaktionsverhalten (3)
- Rechenmodell (3)
- Risiko (3)
- Risk (3)
- Safety belt (3)
- Seat (veh) (3)
- Sensitivity (3)
- Sensor (3)
- Sicherheitsgurt (3)
- Steering (process) (3)
- Straßenverkehrsrecht (3)
- Use (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Visual display (3)
- Weight (3)
- Wirbelsäule (3)
- Abdomen (2)
- Ablenkung (psychol) (2)
- Anthropmetric dummy (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Antikollisionssystem (2)
- Auffahrunfall (2)
- Ausrüstung (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Bildschirm (2)
- Cause (2)
- Cervical vertebrae (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crash Test (2)
- Decrease (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Distraction (2)
- Driving (veh) (2)
- Emission (2)
- Equipment (2)
- Forecast (2)
- Geschwindigkeit (2)
- Haftung (jur) (2)
- Headlamp (2)
- Hospital (2)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (2)
- Interface (2)
- International (2)
- Kamera (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Krankenhaus (2)
- Kunststoff (2)
- Leuchtdichte (2)
- Liability (2)
- Luminance (2)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (2)
- Messgerät (2)
- Nacht (2)
- Night (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- On the spot accident investigation (2)
- Organisation (2)
- Plastic material (2)
- Prognose (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Rear end collision (2)
- Rear view mirror (2)
- Rückspiegel (2)
- Scheinwerfer (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Severity (acid (2)
- Sichtbarkeit (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Speed (2)
- Spinal column (2)
- Stress (psychol) (2)
- Traffic (2)
- Traffic regulations (2)
- Transport infrastructure (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Unterfahrschutz (2)
- Unterleib (2)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (2)
- Verhütung (2)
- Verkehr (2)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (2)
- Verminderung (2)
- Sichtbarkeit (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Windschutzscheibe (2)
- Windscreen (veh) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- (menschl) (1)
- Ablenkung (1)
- Accessibility (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Accident reconstruction (1)
- Achslast (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Angle (1)
- Ankündigung (1)
- Anordnung (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Apparatus (measuring) (1)
- Articulated vehicle (1)
- Attention (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Augenbewegungen (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Axle load (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Baumusterzulassung (1)
- Baustelle (1)
- Beanspruchung (1)
- Bein (1)
- Benchmark (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Brake light (1)
- Bremslicht (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Bus (1)
- Cadaver (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Camera (1)
- Car park (1)
- Carbon dioxide (1)
- Cervical vertebrae; Conference; Evaluation (assessment); Injury; Spinal column; Test (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Compression (1)
- Congestion (traffic) (1)
- Construction (1)
- Construction site (1)
- Contact (tyre road) (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crashtest (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Datenerfassung (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Decke (Straße) (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Detection response task (1)
- Deterioration (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Dimension (1)
- Disstraction (1)
- Driver (veh) (1)
- Driver information system (1)
- Driving aptitude (1)
- Durability (1)
- Dynamic penetration test (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- EU directive (1)
- EU-Richtlinie (1)
- Echtzeit (1)
- Economic efficiency (1)
- Economics of transport (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emergency (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Ergonomie (1)
- Ersatzfahraufgabe (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Eye movement (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahnmarkierung (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrerinformationssystem (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrsimulator (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrtauglichkeit (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Failure (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- Foot (not a measure) (1)
- Form (1)
- Frau (1)
- Freight transport (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Frequenz (1)
- Fuel consumption (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Fuß (1)
- Gelenkfahrzeug (1)
- Grenzfläche (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Güterverkehr (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Herstellung (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Impact study (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- Increase (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Kognitive Aufgabenanforderung (1)
- Kohlendioxid (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kontakt Reifen Straße (1)
- Kontrolle (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kraftstoffverbrauch (1)
- Laborexperiment (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Layout (1)
- Leichnam (1)
- Limit (1)
- Location (1)
- Lärm (1)
- Man-machine interface (1)
- Manufacture (1)
- Market (1)
- Markt (1)
- Materialveränderung (allg) (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nasse Straße (1)
- Noise (1)
- Notfall (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Oberfläche (1)
- Oberflächentextur (1)
- Optimum (1)
- Optische Anzeige (1)
- Organization (1)
- Organization (association) (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Parkfläche (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Productivity (1)
- Properties (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Radio (1)
- Rammsondierung (1)
- Real time (1)
- Rear (1)
- Reconstruction (accid) (1)
- Reflectorized material (1)
- Reflexstoffe (1)
- Reifen (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road marking (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rundfunk (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Safety fence (1)
- Safety glass (1)
- Schallpegel (1)
- Schnittstelle (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzeinrichtung (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Sicherheitsglas (1)
- Side (1)
- Simulator (driving) (1)
- Size and weight regulations (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Sound level (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Soziologie (1)
- Spain (1)
- Spanien (1)
- Specification (standard ) (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Spectrum (1)
- Spektrum (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- Standard (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Stress (1)
- Stress (psycho) (1)
- Surface (1)
- Surface texture (1)
- Surfacing (1)
- Surrogate driving set-up (1)
- Surveillance (1)
- Tactile perception (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Taktiles Signal (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Tracking task (1)
- Trackingaufgabe (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic regulation (1)
- Train (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- Tyre (1)
- USA (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Vehicle regulation (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Vergrößerung (1)
- Verkehrsstauung (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Verkehrswirtschaft (1)
- Vibration (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Warning (1)
- Weather (1)
- Wet road (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Wirtschaftlichkeit (1)
- Witterung (1)
- Woman (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zugänglichkeit (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zulassung (tech) (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
As set out in the Terms of Reference, the objective of European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) Working Group (WG) 15 Car Crash Compatibility and Frontal Impact is to develop a test procedure(s) with associated performance criteria for car frontal impact compatibility. This work should lead to improved car to car frontal compatibility and self protection without decreasing the safety in other impact configuration such as impacts with car sides, trucks, and pedestrians. Since 2003, EEVC WG 15 served as a steering group for the car-to-car activities in the "Improvement of Vehicle Crash Compatibility through the development of Crash Test Procedures" (VC-COMPAT) project that was finalised at the end of 2006 and partly funded by the European Commission. This paper presents the research work carried out in the VC-COMPAT project and the results of its assessment by EEVC WG 15. Other additional work presented by the UK and French governments and industry " in particular the European industry - was taken into consideration. It also identifies current issues with candidate testing approaches. The candidate test approaches are: - an offset barrier test with the progressive deformable barrier (PDB) face in combination with a full width rigid barrier test - a full width wall test with a deformable aluminium honeycomb face and a high resolution load cell wall supplemented by the forces measured in the offset deformable barrier (ODB) test with the current EEVC barrier. These candidate test approaches must assess the structural interaction and give information of frontal force levels and compartment strength for passenger vehicles. Further, this paper presents the planned route map of EEVC WG 15 for the evaluation of the proposed test procedures and assessment criteria.
At the 2005 ESV conference, the International Harmonisation of Research Activities (IHRA) side impact working group proposed a 4 part draft test procedure, to form the basis of harmonisation of regulation world-wide and to help advances in car occupant protection. This paper presents the work performed by a European Commission 6th framework project, called APROSYS, an further development and evaluation of the proposed procedure from a European perspective. The 4 parts of the proposed procedure are: - A Mobile Deformable Barrier test; - An oblique Pole side impact test; - Interior headform tests; - Side Out of Position (OOP) tests. Full scale test and modelling work to develop the Advanced European Mobile Deformable Barrier (AE-MDB) further is described, resulting in a recommendation to revise the barrier face to include a bumper beam element. An evaluation of oblique and perpendicular pole tests was made from tests and numerical simulations using ES-2 and WorldSID 50th percentile dummies. It was concluded that an oblique pole test is feasible but that a perpendicular test would be preferable for Europe. The interior headform test protocol was evaluated to assess its repeatability and reproducibility and to solve issues such as the head impact angle and limitation zones. Recommendations for updates to the test protocol are made. Out-of-position (OOP) tests applicable for the European situation were performed, which included additional tests with Child Restraint Systems (CRS) which use is mandatory in Europe. It was concluded that the proposed IHRA OOP tests do cover the worst case situations, but the current test protocol is not ready for regulatory use.
The use of proper child restraint systems (CRS) is mandatory for children travelling in cars in most countries of the world. The analysis of the quantity of restrained children shows that more than 90% of the children in Germany are restrained. Looking at the quality of the protection, a large discrepancy between restrained and well protected children can be seen. Two out of three children in Germany are not properly restrained. In addition, considerable difference exists with respect to the technical performance of CRS. For that reason investigations and optimisations on two different topics are necessary: The technical improvement of CRS and the ease of use of CRS. Consideration of the knowledge gained by the comparison of different CRS in crash tests would lead to some improvements of the CRS. But improvement of child safety is not only a technical issue. People should use CRS in the correct way. Misuse and incorrect handling could lead to less safety than correct usage of a poor CRS. For that reason new technical issues are necessary to improve the child safety AND the ease of use. Only the combination of both parts can significantly increase child safety. For the assessment of the safety level of common CRS, frontal and lateral sled tests simulating different severity levels were conducted comparing pairs of CRS which were felt to be good and CRS which were felt to be poor. The safety of some CRS is currently at a high level. All well known products were not damaged in the performed tests. The performance of non-branded CRS was mostly worse than that of the well known products. Although the branded child restraint systems already show a high safety level it is still possible to further improve their technical performance as demonstrated with a baby shell and a harness type CRS.
Today, Euro NCAP is a well established rating system for passive car safety. The significance of the ratings must however be evaluated by comparison with national accident data. For this purpose accidents with involvement of two passenger cars have been taken from the German National Road Accident Register (record years 1998 to 2004) to evaluate the results of the NCAP frontal impact test configuration. Injury data from both drivers involved in frontal car to car collisions have been sampled and have been compared, using a "Bradley Terry Model" which is well established in the area of paired comparisons. Confounders " like mass ratio of the cars involved, gender of the driver, etc. " have been accounted for in the statistical model. Applying the Bradley Terry Model to the national accident data the safety ranking from Euro NCAP has been validated (safety level: 1star <2 star <3 star <4 star). Significant safety differences are found between cars of the 1 and 2 star category as compared to cars of the 3 and 4 star category. The impact of the mass ratio was highly significant and most influential. Changing the mass ratio by an amount of 10% will raise the chance for the driver of the heavier car to get better off by about 18%. The impact of driver gender was again highly significant, showing a nearly 2 times lower injury risk for male drivers. With regard to the NCAP rating drivers of a high rated car are more than 2 times more probable (70% chance) to get off less injured in a frontal collision as compared to the driver of a low rated car.
Since 2005 the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) also records aspects of active vehicle safety. This is done because vehicles are fitted with an increasing number of active safety devices which have undoubtedly an influence on the number, severity and course of accidents. Accident researchers expect that collecting active safety data will facilitate to assess and quantify the impact of these and future devices. It is the aim of this paper to outline benefits and limitations associated with the recording of active safety aspects within indepth studies. An overview about possible areas where active safety data can be useful will be given. For that purpose single safety or comfort systems will be selected to estimate the effects of an accident database which includes variables associated with these systems. Questions with regard to the limitations of collecting active safety data will be addressed. Possible items are for example the usability of the data recorded, the real accident cause, the small number of relevant accidents, the time span needed to gather a sufficient dataset, the small share of vehicles equipped with a certain system or different functionalities of systems that are supposed to fall in the same category. As a result user needs for a reasonable data collection of active safety elements will be elaborated.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
The PDB, BASt and Opel conducted two test series to evaluate possible effects on the results obtained using the EEVC WG17 Lower Legform Impactor as a test tool for the assessment of pedestrian safety. The reproducibility and repeatability of the test results were assessed using six legform impactors while keeping the test parameters constant. In the second series one impactor was used and the test parameters were varied to assess the effects on the readings of the legform. The test parameters were velocity, temperature, relative humidity, the point of first contact regarding the deviation in z-direction and the deviations of the pitch, roll and yaw angle. The tests were performed using an inverse setup, i.e. the legform was hit by a guided linear impactor equipped with a honeycomb deformation element. This setup was chosen to be able to vary each single parameter while avoiding variations of the other test parameters at the same time. The test parameters were varied stronger than allowed in regulatory use in order to determine possible dependencies between the parameters and the readings which were acceleration, bending angle and shear displacement.
Powered Two Wheelers (PTWs) accidents constitute one of the road safety problems in Europe. PTWs fatalities represent 22% at EU level in 2006, having increased during last years, representing an opposite trend compared to other road users" figures. In order to reduce these figures it is necessary to investigate the accident causation mechanisms from different points of view (e.g.: human factor, vehicle characteristics, influence of the environment, type of accident). SAFERIDER project ("Advanced telematics for enhancing the SAFEty and comfort of motorcycle RIDERs", under the European Commission "7th Framework Program") has investigated PTW accident mechanisms through literature review and statistical analyses of National and In-depth accident databases; detecting and describing all the possible PTW's accident configurations where the implementation of ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) and IVIS (In-Vehicle Information Systems) could contribute to avoid an accident or mitigate its severity. DIANA, the Spanish in-depth database developed by CIDAUT, has been analyzed for that purpose. DIANA comprises of accident investigation teams, in close cooperation with police forces, medical services, forensic surgeons, garages and scrap yards. An important innovation is the fact that before injured people arrive to hospitals, photographs and explanations about the possible accident injury mechanisms are sent to the respective hospitals (via 3G GPRS technology). By this, additional information to medical staff can be provided in order to predict in advance possible internal injuries and select the best medical treatment. This methodology is presented in this paper. On the other hand, the main results (corresponding to road, rider and PTW characteristics; pre and post-accident manoeuvres; road layout; rider behaviour; impact points; accident causations;...) from the analyses of the PTW accidents used for SAFERIDER are shown. Only accident types relevant to ADAS and IVIS devices have been considered.
Since its beginning in 1999, the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) evolved into the presumably leading representative road traffic accident investigation in Europe, based on the work started in Hanover in 1973. The detailed and comprehensive description of traffic accidents forms an essential basis for vehicle safety research. Due to the ongoing extension of demands of researchers, there is a continuous progress in the techniques and systematic of accident investigation within GIDAS. This paper presents some of the most important developments over the last years. Primary vehicle safety systems are expected to have a significant and increasing influence on reducing accidents. GIDAS therefore began to include and collect active safety parameters as new variables from the year 2005 onwards. This will facilitate to assess the impact of present and future active safety measures. A new system to analyse causation factors of traffic accidents, called ACASS, was implemented in GIDAS in the year 2008. The whole process of data handling was optimised. Since 2005 the on-scene data acquisition is completely conducted with mobile tablet PCs. Comprehensive plausibility checks assure a high data quality. Multi-language codebooks are automatically generated from the database structure itself and interfaces ensure the connection to various database management systems. Members of the consortium can download database and codebook, and synchronize half a terabyte of photographic documentation through a secured online access. With the introduction of the AIS 2005 in the year 2006, some medical categorizations have been revised. To ensure the correct assignment of AIS codes to specific injuries an application based on a diagnostic dictionary was developed. Furthermore a coding tool for the AO classification was introduced. All these enhancements enable GIDAS to be up to date for future research questions.