91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (82) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (27)
- Konferenz (26)
- Test method (26)
- Prüfverfahren (25)
- Safety (25)
- Sicherheit (25)
- Anfahrversuch (24)
- Impact test (veh) (24)
- Bewertung (22)
- Evaluation (assessment) (22)
- Fahrzeug (22)
- Fußgänger (22)
- Pedestrian (22)
- Vehicle (21)
- Anthropometric dummy (16)
- Collision (16)
- Dummy (16)
- Accident (15)
- Simulation (15)
- Unfall (15)
- Zusammenstoß (14)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (12)
- Deutschland (11)
- Germany (11)
- Head on collision (11)
- Analyse (math) (10)
- Analysis (math) (10)
- Driver assistance system (10)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (10)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (10)
- Biomechanics (9)
- Biomechanik (9)
- Car (9)
- Child (9)
- Kind (9)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Severity (accid, injury) (9)
- Active safety system (8)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (8)
- Autonomes Fahren (8)
- Autonomous driving (8)
- Europa (8)
- Europe (8)
- Kompatibilität (8)
- Passive safety system (8)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (8)
- Vehicle regulations (8)
- Versuch (8)
- Automatic (7)
- Automatisch (7)
- Compatibility (7)
- Cyclist (7)
- Driver (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- Forschungsarbeit (7)
- Improvement (7)
- Pkw (7)
- Research project (7)
- Test (7)
- Verbesserung (7)
- Bemessung (6)
- Design (overall design) (6)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (6)
- Severity (accid (6)
- Side impact (6)
- Standardisierung (6)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (6)
- injury) (6)
- Collision avoidance system (5)
- Cost benefit analysis (5)
- Deformierbare Barriere (Anpralltest) (5)
- Fahrstabilität (5)
- Gesetzgebung (5)
- Head (5)
- Injury (5)
- Insasse (5)
- Knee (human) (5)
- Kopf (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Lkw (5)
- Lorry (5)
- Official approval (5)
- Vehicle handling (5)
- Vehicle occupant (5)
- Verletzung (5)
- Verletzung) (5)
- Accident prevention (4)
- Antikollisionssystem (4)
- Brustkorb (4)
- Datenbank (4)
- Development (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Entwicklung (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Modification (4)
- Prevention (4)
- Reproducibility (4)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (4)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (4)
- Standardization (4)
- Technologie (4)
- Technology (4)
- Thorax (4)
- Unfallverhütung (4)
- Alte Leute (3)
- Aufprallschlitten (3)
- Ausrüstung (3)
- Bein (menschl) (3)
- Belastung (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Body (car) (3)
- Database (3)
- Decrease (3)
- Deformable barrier (impact test) (3)
- Deformation (3)
- EU (3)
- Equipment (3)
- Error (3)
- Fahrzeugführung (3)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (3)
- Fahrzeugsitz (3)
- Fehler (3)
- Human body (3)
- Impact sled (3)
- Intelligent transport system (3)
- Interior (veh) (3)
- Karosserie (3)
- Knie (menschl) (3)
- Leg (human) (3)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (3)
- Load (3)
- Menschlicher Körper (3)
- Method (3)
- Motorcycle (3)
- Motorrad (3)
- Safety belt (3)
- Seat (veh) (3)
- Sicherheitsgurt (3)
- Steering (process) (3)
- Unterfahrschutz (3)
- Use (3)
- Verfahren (3)
- Verhütung (3)
- Verminderung (3)
- Veränderung (3)
- Active safety (2)
- Airbag (2)
- Aktive Sicherheit (2)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (2)
- Autonomous vehicle (2)
- Baumusterzulassung (2)
- Behaviour (2)
- Bicyclist (2)
- Braking (2)
- Bremsung (2)
- Cause (2)
- Classification (2)
- Crashtest (2)
- Data acquisition (2)
- Datenerfassung (2)
- Detection (2)
- Detektion (2)
- Driver information (2)
- Driving (veh) (2)
- Empfindlichkeit (2)
- Fahrerinformation (2)
- Fatality (2)
- Forecast (2)
- Front (2)
- Geschwindigkeit (2)
- Gewicht (2)
- Headlamp (2)
- Hinten (2)
- Impact test (2)
- Individueller Verkehr (2)
- Information (2)
- Intelligentes Transportsystem (2)
- International (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Knie (2)
- Kraftfahrzeug (2)
- Mathematical model (2)
- Measurement (2)
- Messung (2)
- Nacht (2)
- Night (2)
- Norm (tech) (2)
- Old people (2)
- Private transport (2)
- Prognose (2)
- Prototyp (2)
- Prototype (2)
- Rear (2)
- Rechenmodell (2)
- Richtlinien (2)
- Risiko (2)
- Risk (2)
- Road user (2)
- Sample (mater) (2)
- Scheinwerfer (2)
- Schutz (2)
- Sensitivity (2)
- Sensor (2)
- Specification (standard) (2)
- Specifications (2)
- Speed (2)
- Statistics (2)
- Statistik (2)
- Tödlicher Unfall (2)
- Underride protection (2)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (2)
- Ursache (2)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (2)
- Verformung (2)
- Verhalten (2)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (2)
- Warning (2)
- Warnung (2)
- Weight (2)
- Zulassung (tech) (2)
- Zusammenstoss (2)
- Abdomen (1)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (1)
- Accident data (1)
- Accident rate (1)
- Accident reconstruction (1)
- Adaptive cruise control (1)
- Adult (1)
- Aged people (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Angle (1)
- Anti locking device (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antikollisisonssystem (1)
- Apparatus (measurement) (1)
- Arbeitsgruppe (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Autobahn (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bau (1)
- Benefit cost analysis (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bildschirm (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Brake (1)
- Bremse (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Bus (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Chassis (1)
- Comfort (1)
- Communication (1)
- Compatiblity (1)
- Components of the vehicle (1)
- Compression (1)
- Construction (1)
- Cooperative intelligent transport system (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Crash Test (1)
- Crash helmet (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Data processing (1)
- Data security (1)
- Data transmission (1)
- Datensicherheit (1)
- Datenverarbeitung (1)
- Datenübertragung (telekom) (1)
- Dauerhaftigkeit (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Deformable barrier (Impact test) (1)
- Deformable barrier system (impact test) (1)
- Dehnungsmessstreifen (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Demographie (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Digital model (1)
- Driving (1)
- Durability (1)
- Dynamo (1)
- Echtzeit (1)
- Eichung (1)
- Electric vehicle (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektrofahrzeug (1)
- Elektronische Fahrhilfe (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emission control (1)
- Emissionskontrolle (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Ergonomics (1)
- Erwachsener (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrleistung (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrstreifen (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrwerk (1)
- Fahrzeugbeleuchtung (1)
- Fahrzeugteile (1)
- Failure (1)
- Feuer (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Fire (1)
- Form (1)
- Frau (1)
- Future transport mode (1)
- Gestaltung (1)
- Grenzwert (1)
- Harmonisation (1)
- Harmonisierung (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Head (human) (1)
- Height (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Höhe (1)
- Hüfte (menschl) (1)
- Impact study (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- Information documentation (1)
- Information management (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Interactive model (1)
- Interaktives Modell (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Kamera (1)
- Kleintransporter (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Komfort (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kompatiblität (1)
- Kooperatives System (ITS) (1)
- Kopf (menschl) (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kunststoff (1)
- Landstraße (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Layout (1)
- Leuchtdichte (1)
- Limit (1)
- Luminance (1)
- Mensch Maschine Verhältnis (1)
- Messgerät (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Motorway (1)
- Moving (1)
- Naturalistic Driving (1)
- Naturalistic driving (1)
- Numerisches Modell (1)
- Organisation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Pelvis (1)
- Perception (1)
- Pfahl (1)
- Pile (1)
- Plastic material (1)
- Population (1)
- Probe (1)
- Prüefverfahren (1)
- Prüfkörper (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Quality (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualität (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radio (1)
- Real time (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Rear view mirror (1)
- Reconstruction (accid) (1)
- Reflectorized material (1)
- Reflexstoffe (1)
- Reifen (1)
- Rippe (menschl) (1)
- Road traffic (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Route guidance (1)
- Rundfunk (1)
- Rural road (1)
- Rückspiegel (1)
- Schulter (1)
- Schutzhelm (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Seite (1)
- Shape (1)
- Shoulder (human) (1)
- Sichtbarkeit (1)
- Side (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Stadardization (1)
- Stadt (1)
- Stand der Technik (Bericht) (1)
- State of the art report (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Strain gauge (1)
- Straßenverkehr (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Telekommunikation (1)
- Tests (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Toxicity (1)
- Toxizität (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Traffic control (1)
- Traffic lanes (1)
- Train (1)
- Typenzulassung (1)
- Tyre (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfalldaten (1)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Unterleib (1)
- Urban area (1)
- Vehicle Regulations (1)
- Vehicle lighting (1)
- Vehicle mile (1)
- Veraenderung (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrssteuerung (1)
- Video camera (1)
- Sichtbarkeit (1)
- Visual display (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Vorne (1)
- Wahrnehmung (1)
- Windschutzscheibe (1)
- Windscreen (veh) (1)
- Winkel (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- Woman (1)
- Working group (1)
- Zielführungssystem (1)
- Zug (Eisenbahn) (1)
- Zukünftiges Verkehrsmittel (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Überdeckung (1)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (82) (entfernen)
Die Level kontinuierlicher Fahrzeugautomatisierung sind unter Fahrerassistenzexperten weithin bekannt und erleichtern das Verständnis. Sie können aber nicht Fahrzeugautomatisierung insgesamt zufriedenstellend beschreiben: Insbesondere temporär intervenierende Funktionen, die in unfallnahen Situationen eingreifen, können offensichtlich nicht nach dem Level kontinuierlicher Fahrzeugautomatisierung beschrieben werden. Diese beschreiben nämlich die zunehmende Aufgabenverlagerung vom Fahrer zur maschinellen Steuerung bei zunehmendem Automatisierungsgrad. Notbremsfunktionen, beispielsweise, sind offensichtlich diskontinuierlich und nehmen zugleich auf intensive Weise Einfluss auf die Fahrzeugsteuerung. Sie lassen sich gerade nicht sinnvoll nach dem Level kontinuierlicher Fahrzeugautomatisierung beschreiben. Das Ergebnis kann indes nicht zufriedenstellen: Die fehlende Sichtbarkeit dieser Funktionen wird ihrer Bedeutung für die Verkehrssicherheit nicht gerecht. Daher wird hier, um ein vollständiges Bild der Fahrzeugautomatisierung zu erlangen, ein umfassender Ansatz zur Beschreibung verfolgt, der auf oberster Ebene nach Wirkweise unterscheidet. Auf dieser Basis lassen sich sowohl informierende und warnende Funktionen als auch solche, die nur temporär in unfallgeneigten Situationen intervenieren, im Detail beschreiben. Das ermöglicht es, eine eigenständige Klassifikation für unfallgeneigte Situationen zu erstellen. Dies kann für diese wichtigen Funktionen die eigenständige Sichtbarkeit herstellen, die ihrer Bedeutung gerecht wird.
Im Rahmen des weltweiten ESV-Programmes (Enhanced Safety of Vehicles) werden seit mehreren Jahren internationale Forschungsbemühungen unternommen (International Harmonized Research Activities, IHRA), um im Vorfeld der Gesetzgebung die wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen gemeinsam zu erarbeiten. Ziel der IHRA-Arbeiten ist es, auf der Grundlage dieser Forschungsergebnisse die Harmonisierung der Vorschriften zu erleichtern. Eine besondere Aktivität bezieht sich auf Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird die Aufgabe dieser IHRA-ITS-Arbeiten geschildert, sowie der derzeitige Stand der Forschungsbemühungen beschrieben. Es zeigt sich, dass die beschriebene Sicherheitsbewertung eine Fülle von Fragestellungen aufwirft und weitere Forschungsanstrengungen erfordert. Die zukünftigen Bemühungen sind darauf gerichtet, in internationaler Zusammenarbeit und Arbeitsteilung die als besonders wichtig erkannten Themen zur Bewertung der fahrzeugseitigen Fahrerassistenzsysteme zu bearbeiten.
For a number of EU regulatory acts Virtual Testing (VT) is already allowed for type approval (see Commission Regulation No. 371/2010 of 16 April 2010 amending the Framework Directive 2007/46/EC). However, only a very general procedure on how to apply VT for type approval is provided. Technical details for specific regulatory acts are not given yet. The main objective of the European project IMVITER (IMplementation of VIrtual TEsting in Safety Regulations) was to promote the implementation of VT in safety regulations. When proposing VT procedures the new regulation was taken into account, in particular, addressing open issues. Special attention was paid to pedestrian protection as pilot cases. A key aspect for VT implementation is to demonstrate that the employed simulation models are reliable. This paper describes how the Verification and Validation (V&V) method defined by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers was adapted for pedestrian protection VT based assessment. or the certification of headform impactors an extensive study was performed at two laboratories to assess the variability in calibration tests and equivalent results from a set of simulation models. Based on these results a methodology is defined for certification of headform impactor simulation models. A similar study was also performed with one vehicle in the type approval test setup. Its bonnet was highly instrumented and subjected to 45 impacts in five different positions at two laboratories in order to obtain an estimation of the variability in the physical tests. An equivalent study was performed using stochastic simulation with a metamodel fed with observed variability in impact conditions of physical headforms. An estimation of the test method uncertainty was obtained and used in the definition of a validation corridor for simulation models. Validation metric and criteria were defined in cooperation with the ISO TC22 SC10 and SC12 WG4 "Virtual Testing". A complete validation procedure including different test setups, physical magnitudes and evaluation criteria is provided. A detailed procedural flowchart is developed for VT implementation in EC Regulation No 78/2009 based on a so called "Hybrid VT" approach, which combines real hardware based head impact tests and simulations. This detailed flowchart is shown and explained within this paper. Another important point within the virtual testing based procedures is the documentation of relevant information resulting from the verification and validation process of the numerical models used. For this purpose report templates were developed within the project. The proposed procedure fixes minimum V&V requirements for numerical models to be confidently used within the type-approval process. It is not intended to be a thorough guide on how to build such reliable models. Different modeling methodologies are therefore possible, according to particular OEM know-how. These requirements respond to a balance amongst the type-approval stakeholders interests. A cost-benefit analysis, which was also performed within the IMVITER project, supports this approach, showing the conditions in which VT implementation is beneficial. Based on the experience gained in the project and the background of the experts involved an outlook is given as a roadmap of VT implementation, identifying the most important milestones to be reached along the way to a future vehicle type approval procedure supported by VT. The results presented in this paper show an important step addressing open questions and fostering the future acceptance of virtual testing in pedestrian protection type approval procedures.
Fahrerassistenzsysteme unterstützen den Fahrer durch Information, Warnung oder Eingriff in die Fahrzeugsteuerung. Zukünftige Systeme zur Kollisionsvermeidung oder bis hin zum automatischen Fahren werden den Fahrer immer mehr entlasten. Wegen ihres erheblichen Potenzials zur Verbesserung vor allem der aktiven Sicherheit können die Fahrerassistenzsysteme wesentlich zur Vermeidung von Unfällen oder der Reduktion von Unfallfolgen beitragen. Andererseits können Fahrerassistenzsysteme aufgrund des komplexen Systemzusammenhangs zwischen Fahrer, Fahrzeug und Umwelt negative Auswirkungen auf das Verkehrsgeschehen haben. Dieser Aspekt muss schon bei der Entwicklung der Systeme berücksichtigt werden. Die Empfehlung der Europäischen Kommission zur Gestaltung von Informations- und Kommunikationssystemen gibt dazu Leitlinien vor. Die BASt ist mit der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung der Thematik beauftragt. Die Industrie ist dazu aufgefordert darzulegen, welche Maßnahmen zur Einhaltung der Grundsätze ergriffen worden sind beziehungsweise werden. Um das Potenzial der Fahrerassistenzsysteme zur Steigerung der Verkehrssicherheit voll ausschöpfen zu können, sind weiterhin Forschungsarbeiten zur Entwicklung neuer und zur Weiterentwicklung bestehender Systeme unter Berücksichtigung der Gestaltungsanforderungen für sichere Assistenzsysteme durchzuführen.
The project UR:BAN "Cognitive assistance (KA)" aims at developing future assistance systems providing improved performance in complex city traffic. New state-of-the-art panoramic sensor technologies now allow comprehensive monitoring and evaluation of the vehicle environment. In order to improve protection of vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists, a particular objective of UR:BAN is the evaluation and prediction of their behaviour and actions. The objective of subproject "WER" is development support by providing quantitative estimates of traffic collisions at the very start and predict potential in terms of optimized accident avoidance and reduction of injury severity. For this purpose an integrated computer simulation toolkit is being devised based on real world accidents (GIDAS as well as video documented accidents), allowing the prediction of potential effectiveness and future benefit of assistance systems in this accident scenario. Subsequently, this toolkit may be used for optimizing the design of implemented assistance systems for improved effectiveness.
A biofidelic flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been developed from the year 2000 onwards and evaluated by a technical evaluation group (Flex-TEG) of UN-ECE GRSP. A recently established UN-ECE GRSP Informal Group on GTR9 Phase 2 is aiming at introducing the FlexPLI within world-wide regulations on pedestrian safety (Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 as well as the new UN regulation 127 on pedestrian safety) as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents. Besides, the FlexPLI has already been introduced within JNCAP and is on the Euro NCAP roadmap for 2014. Despite of the biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia sections, several open issues related to the FlexPLI, like the estimation of the cost benefit, the feasibility of vehicle compliance with the threshold values, the robustness of the impactor and of the test results, the comparability between prototype and production level and the finalization of certification corridors still needed to be solved. Furthermore, discussions with stakeholders about a harmonized lower legform to bumper test area are still going on. This paper describes several studies carried out by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) regarding the benefit due to the introduction of the FlexPLI within legislation for type approval, the robustness of test results, the establishment of new assembly certification corridors and a proposal for a harmonized legform to bumper test area. Furthermore, a report on vehicle tests that previously had been carried out with three prototype legforms and were now being repeated using legforms with serial production status, is given. Finally, the paper gives a status report on the ongoing simulation and testing activities with respect to the development and evaluation of an improved test procedure with upper body mass for assessing pedestrian femur injuries.
Automated driving will provide many kinds of benefits - some direct and some indirect. The benefits originate at the individual level, from changes in the behaviour of drivers and travellers with regard to driving and mobility, ending up with benefits at the social level via changes in the whole transport system and society, where many of the current planning and operations paradigms are likely to be transformed by automated driving. There may also be disbenefits, particularly at a social level, for example in intensity of travel which could result in additional congestion and increased use of natural resources. There may also be unintended consequences. For example, we do not know the impacts on public transport: driverless vehicles could provide a means to a lower cost service provision, but the availability of automated cars could lead to more car travel at the expense of collective transport.
Past European collaborative research involving government bodies, vehicle manufacturers and test laboratories has resulted in a prototype barrier face called the Advanced European Mobile Deformable Barrier (AE-MDB) for use in a new side impact test procedure . This procedure offers a better representation of the current accident situation and, in particular, the barrier concept is a better reflection of front-end stiffness seen in today- passenger car fleet compared to that of the current legislative barrier face. Based on the preliminary performance corridors of the prototype AE-MDB, a refined AE-MDB specification has been developed. A programme of barrier to load cell wall testing was undertaken to complete and standardise the AE-MDB specification. Barrier faces were supplied by the four leading manufacturers to demonstrate that the specification could be met by all. This paper includes background, specification and proof of compliance.
Side-impact safety of passenger cars is assessed in Europe in a full-scale test using a moving barrier. The front of this barrier is deformable and represents the stiffness of an 'average' car. The EU Directive 96/27/EC on side impact protection has adopted the EEVC Side Impact Test Procedure, including the original performance specification for the barrier face when impacting a flat dynamometric rigid wall. The requirements of the deformable barrier face, as laid down in the Directive, are related to geometrical characteristics, deformation characteristics and energy dissipation figures. Due to these limited requirements, many variations are possible in designing a deformable barrier face. As a result, several barrier face designs are in the market. However, research institutes and car manufacturers report significant difference in test results when using these different devices. It appears that the present approval test is not able to distinguish between the different designs that may perform differently when they impact real vehicles. Therefore, EEVC Working Group 13 has developed a number of tests to evaluate the different designs. In these tests the barrier faces are loaded and deformed in a specific and/or more representative way. Barrier faces of different design have been evaluated. In the paper the set-up and the reasoning behind the tests is presented. Results showing specific differences in performance are demonstrated.