91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Anfahrversuch (53) (entfernen)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (39)
- Sonstige (28)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (1)
- Präsident (1)
Rollovers continue to be a major source of heavy truck fatalities when compared to other accident modes. Real world rollover accidents are analyzed and two distinct damage patterns are identified. Damage to heavy truck roofs can occur from lateral loading that transitions to vertical roof loading as the vehicle rolls onto its side and then over onto its roof. A second load path can occur when the vehicle has rolled onto its side and furrows into the ground generating large longitudinal friction forces between the roof and ground. A review of the previous literature and various test methodologies are presented. A sled impact test methodology is presented which allows for structural assessment of a heavy truck cab's crashworthiness in both of these loading environments. Two test series are presented using the sled impact test methodology in order to analyze real world truck rollovers using varying impact platen and contact angles. The structural deformation and failure patterns were found to be consistent with damage seen in real world accident vehicles. In each case, a second equivalent truck cab was then reinforced and tested under similar conditions to evaluate the energy management and crush resistance of a stronger cab structure. These structural reinforcements demonstrated a substantial reduction in roof crush and protected the survival space of the occupant compartment. The sled impact test procedure is an effective method for testing the structural performance of a heavy truck cab in a variety of loading scenarios comparable to real world accidents and ascertaining the load and energy load levels in these accident modes.
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe (EU27) is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car's safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EU-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car's frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation. This paper reports the cost benefit analyses performed to estimate the effect of the following potential changes to the frontal impact regulation: • Option 1 " No change and allow current measures to propagate throughout the vehicle fleet. • Option 2 " Add a full width test to the current offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) test. • Option 3 " Add a full width test and replace the current ODB test with a Progressive Deformable Barrier (PDB) test. For the analyses national data were used from Great Britain (STATS 19) and from Germany (German Federal Statistical Office). In addition in-depth real word crash data were used from CCIS (Great Britain) and GIDAS (Germany). To estimate the benefit a generalised linear model, an injury reduction model and a matched pairs modelling approach were applied. The benefits were estimated to be: for Option 1 "No change" about 2.0%; for Option 2 "FW test" ranging from 5 to 12% and for Option 3 "FW and PDB tests" 9 to 14% of car occupant killed and seriously injured casualties.
The utilisation of secondary-safety systems to protect occupants has attained a very high level over the past decades. Further improvements are still possible, but increasingly minor progress is only to be had with a high degree of effort. Thus, a key aspect must be the impact to overall safety in an accident. If reliable information is available on an imminent crash, measures already taken in the pre-crash phase can result in a significantly great influence on the outcomes of the crash. With this background preventive measures are the key to a sustainable further reduction of the figures of crash victims on our roads. This paper aims to show a preventive approach that can contribute to lessening the consequences of a crash by creating an optimum interaction of measures in the fields of primary and secondary safety. To further enhance vehicle safety, driver assistant systems are already available that warn the driver of an imminent front-to-rear-end crash. The next step is to support him in his reactions or if he fails to react sufficiently, to even initiate an automatic braking when the crash becomes unavoidable. Automatic pre-crash braking can, in an ideal situation, fully prevent a crash or can significantly reduce the impact speed and thus the impact energy (and the severity of the accident). If a vehicle is being braked in the pre-crash phase, the occupants are already being pre-stressed by the deceleration. The information available about the imminent crash can be used to activate the belt tensioners and likewise other secondary safety systems in the vehicle right before the impact. The pre-crash deceleration also causes the front of the vehicle to dip. Conventional crash tests do not take this specific impact situation into consideration. This is why, for example, the influences of the pre-crash displacements of the occupants are not recorded in the test results. Furthermore, a reproducible representation of the benefit of the vehicle safety systems which prepare the occupants for the imminent impact is not possible. In order to demonstrate the functions of automated pre-crash braking and to investigate the differences during the impact as a consequence of the altered occupant positions as well as the initiation of force and deformations of the vehicle front, DEKRA teamed up with BMW to carry out a joint crash test with the latest BMW 5 series vehicle. It involved the vehicle braking automatically from a starting test speed of 64 km/h (corresponding to the impact speed set by Euro NCAP) down to 40 km/h. The test was still run by the intelligent drive system of the crash test facility. This required several modifications to be made to the test facility as well as to the vehicle. The paper will describe and discuss some relevant results of the crash test. In addition, the possible benefits of such systems will also be considered. The test supplemented the work of the vFSS working group (vFSS stands advanced Forward-looking Safety Systems).
Rear-end collisions are the most frequent same and opposite-direction crashes. Common causes include momentary inattention, inadequate speed or inadequate distance. While most rear-end collisions in urban traffic only result in vehicle damage or slight injuries, rear-end collisions outside built-up areas or on motorways usually cause fatal or serious injuries. Driver assistance systems that detect dangerous situations in the longitudinal vehicle direction are therefore an essential safety plus. In view of this, for ADAC, systems that alert drivers to dangerous situations and initiate autonomous braking complement ESC as one of the most important active safety features in modern vehicles. The aim of ADAC is to provide consumers with technical advice and competent information about the systems available on the market. Reliable comparative tests that are based on standardised test criteria may provide motorists with important information and help them make a buying decision. In addition, they raise consumer awareness of the systems and speed up their market penetration. The assessment must focus on as many aspects of effectiveness as possible and include not only autonomous braking but also collision warning and autonomous brake assist. The work of the ADAC accident research is the development of the testing scenarios with direct link to accident situations and the identification of useful test criteria for testing.
Over the past two decades the popularity of consumer crash test programs, commonly referred to as New Car Assessment Programs (NCAP), has grown across the world. They are popular among government regulators as they afford a means of promoting safety innovations and levels of vehicle performance beyond those dictated by national standards. They also fulfill the demand for information regarding the safety ranking of vehicles among consumers contemplating the purchase of a new vehicle. There is no question that consumer crash test programs greatly influence vehicle design changes as well as accelerate the fitment of new safety features. The extent to which these changes can be expected to reduce serious and potentially fatal injuries will be influenced by how well the testing protocols and associated rating schemes correctly reflect the nature of the residual safety problem they seek to address. Drawing on data contained primarily in the US National Automotive Sampling System (NASS), the field relevance of current and proposed testing and rating protocols addressing frontal crash test protection is examined. Emphasis is placed on examining how accurately injury rates computed from the dummy responses measured in consumer crash tests correspond to actual injury rates observed in the field. Additional data from Canadian field investigations and US databases such as the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey (NMVCCS) are examined to see how well frontal airbag firing times, crush pulse durations and other determinants of injury are replicated in consumer testing protocols. This portion of the analysis draws on data obtained from Event Data Recorders (EDR) in both field collisions and staged tests of the same vehicle model. Vehicle rankings and overall frontal crash test ratings were found to be particularly sensitive to the choice of injury risk functions employed in the test. This was particularly true in the case of injury risk functions used to assess neck injury potential. Neck injury risk derived from Nij was found to show the least agreement with the field. Agreement between field chest injury rates and those derived from crash tests was improved considerably when chest injury risk functions for "older" occupants were employed. The paper concludes with a discussion of how different current testing protocols could be improved to enhance their field relevance.
Females sustain Cervical Spine Distortion injury (CSD) more often than males. Most work dealing with the biomechanics background (e.g. injury mechanism/criteria) as well as the application in seat design/testing, focuses on the occupant model of an average male. Therefore the EU-Project ADSEAT (Adaptive Seat to Reduce Neck Injuries for Female and Male Occupants) is aimed at adding a female model for gender balanced research of CSD and improving seat design. An extensive literature review, searching for risk factors and injury criteria for males and females, was accompanied by the evaluation of different databases containing CSD cases. The database evaluations suggests that an anthropometry quite close to the 50%ile female anthropometry as known from crash test dummy design is appropriate. The results presented here form the basis for the future development of a computational female model and the improvement of seat design for better protection of both males and females in the frame of the ADSEAT-Project.
Impact severity is a fundamental measure for all in-depth crash investigation projects. One methodology used in the UK is based on the US Calspan software package CRASH3. The UK- in-depth crash investigation studies routinely use AiDamage3 a software package which is based on an updated version of the original CRASH3 algorithm, including enhancements to the vehicle stiffness coefficients. Real world accident-damaged vehicles are measured and their crush is correlated with a library of stiffness coefficients. These measurements are then used, along with other parameters, to calculate the crash energy and equivalent changes of velocity of the vehicles (delta-v), which is a measure of the impact severity. UK in-depth accident studies routinely validate the crash severity methodologies applied as the vehicle fleet changes. This is achieved by analysing crash test data and using the appropriate residual crush damage and other inputs to AiDamage3 and checking the program- outputs with the known crash severity parameters. This procedure checks, at least in part, the default stiffness values in the data libraries and the reconstruction methods used.
The price of a new car increased almost every year for a long period. In recent years however, the budget available to most people for purchasing a car either did not grow or became even smaller. Therefore it was in the interest of some OEMs to offer economical car models in the so-called "8,000- Euro class". Here an important question arose regarding the safety of these vehicles. There is no question that the very high safety level of cars reached in Europe during the last decades should not be sacrificed as a consequence of smaller budgets. Customers with sense of responsibility have the right to be properly informed about the balance between safety and price so that they can make a deliberate decision when buying either a new or a used car. Against this background, the German magazine "AutoBILD" commissioned DEKRA to conduct fullscale frontal crash tests with a view to publishing the results. These tests have been carried out in accordance with the corresponding Euro NCAP crash test requirements and performance criteria. The tested vehicles were two new Logans produced by the manufacturer Dacia, two used cars of the type VW Golf IV (registration date 2000) and one new VW Fox. This paper describes the safety features of the vehicles and the results of the five crash tests to demonstrate state-of-the-art safety levels and what levels may be expected from vehicles in the "8,000- Euro class". Looking at real-world crashes it is of interest to think about future trends in a more detailed manner. Therefore it will be more and more necessary to supplement the federal statistics with more detailed in-depth information about the consequences of accidents and the safety performance of crashed vehicles.
Neben der zunehmenden Bedeutung der aktiven Sicherheit bleiben Maßnahmen der passiven Sicherheit bei der Entwicklung moderner Kraftfahrzeuge unabdingbar. Die Weiterentwicklung von Maßnahmen zum passiven Fußgängerschutz war zunächst größtenteils durch Verbraucherschutztests wie zum Beispiel Euro NCAP oder JNCAP getrieben und ist nun auch durch gesetzliche Regelungen verpflichtend geworden. Im vorangegangenen Forschungsprojekt der BASt FE 82.229/2002 Schutz von Fußgängern beim Scheibenaufprall ist die Grundlage eines modularen Prüfverfahrens für den Kopfaufprall im Bereich der Windschutzscheibe, bestehend aus einem Versuchs- und einem Simulationsteil, erarbeitet worden. Im Rahmen dieses Projektes wurde ein hybrides Testverfahren bestehend aus Versuch und Simulation ausgearbeitet, das den Bereich der Windschutzscheibe und dabei auch crashaktive Systeme wie Airbags berücksichtigt. Das Testverfahren kombiniert Komponentenversuche mit einem Simulationsteil, in dem Fahrzeug-Fußgänger-Simulationen und lmpaktorsimulationen durchgeführt werden. Zusätzliche Dummyversuche dienten zur Bewertung des Testverfahrens. Alle erarbeiteten virtuellen und realen Testmethoden wurden an einem Referenzfahrzeug (Opel Signum), welches repräsentativ für eine durchschnittliche Mittelklasselimousine steht, durchgeführt. Das Fahrzeug wurde mit einem Airbagsystem ausgerüstet und der Testprozedur mit und ohne diesem System vergleichend unterzogen. Innerhalb dieser Untersuchungen konnte gezeigt werden, dass neue Testmethoden unter Ausnutzung von Simulationen und Komponententests es erlauben, realistischere Versuchsbedingungen unter Berücksichtigung von potenziellen Kopfaufprallpositionen und -zeiten zu definieren. Dabei können sehr gute Übereinstimmungen zwischen Fußgängersimulation und Dummyversuch erreicht werden. Die Randbedingungen für den Kopfaufprall und die Aufprallzeit wurden durch den Einsatz von Fußgängermodellen ermittelt. Weiterhin ermöglichen die Simulationen, zusätzliche Einflussdaten wie Vektoren mit den Kopfaufprallgeschwindigkeiten und -winkeln zu bestimmen.
Abstract: Für Kinder in Deutschland existiert im Pkw weiterhin ein höheres Risiko, im Straßenverkehr bei einem Unfall schwer verletzt oder getötet zu werden, als es für ungeschützte Verkehrsteilnehmer wie Fahrradfahrer oder Fußgänger besteht. Dies erscheint auf den ersten Blick nicht nachvollziehbar, da der Pkw und die vorgeschriebenen Kindersitze den Kindern eine hohe Sicherheit bieten müssten. Der vorliegende Projektbericht gibt Aufschluss über den aktuellen Stand der Sicherheit von Kindern im Pkw in Deutschland und zeigt Optimierungspotenzial auf. Die Schutzwirkung der Kindersitze hängt von mehreren Faktoren ab. Dabei stehen technische Aspekte, die hier detailliert untersucht wurden, im Vordergrund. Doch vor allem in den letzten Jahren zeigte sich immer wieder in Feldstudien, aber auch in der Unfallanalyse, dass Kinderschutzsysteme (KSS) oftmals nicht nach den Vorgaben installiert wurden. Wenn der Kindersitz und/oder das Kind nicht entsprechend der Bedienungsanleitung gesichert werden, kann sich das Schutzpotenzial der KSS reduzieren und gegen Null gehen. Im schlimmsten Fall stellt eine fehlerhafte Benutzung von KSS eine Gefahr sowohl für das Kind als auch für andere Pkw-Insassen dar. Die Unfallanalyse ergab keine Aussage darüber, ob verschiedene KSS-Modelle zu unterschiedlichen Verletzungsmustern führen, da die Unfallkonstellationen pro KSS-Modell zu verschieden waren. Des Weiteren wurde analysiert, inwieweit heutige Testverfahren mit diesen Konstellationen übereinstimmen. Das Ziel, mit wenigen Verfahren möglichst alle relevanten Unfälle abzubilden, wurde zum Teil ereicht. Zu viele Testverfahren mit unterschiedlichen Bewertungssystemen stellen heutzutage die Endverbraucher vor das Problem, dass nicht klar ist, welches KSS wirklich das beste ist. In der Realität hängt die Schutzwirkung zudem noch wesentlich von der KSS-Pkw-Kombination ab, die nur annähernd durch Versuche überprüft werden kann, da sich eine zu hohe Anzahl von Kombinationsmöglichkeiten ergibt. Anhand von mehr als 100 Versuchen wurde das Schutzpotenzial von verschiedenen aktuellen Kindersitzmodellen untersucht. Dabei wurden immer vermeintlich gute und schlechte KSS gegenübergestellt und unter gleichen Randbedingungen getestet. Ziel dieses Vorgehens war es, anhand der Messergebnisse Maßnahmen zu erkennen, die dem Schutz der Kinder dienlich sind. Zusammenfassend kann gesagt werden, dass prinzipiell für Kinder ein gutes Schutzniveau durch KSS besteht, was aber von KSS zu KSS verschieden sein kann. Die teureren KSS wiesen keine mechanische Zerstörung auf und überstanden alle Tests ohne ernsthafte Beschädigungen. Lediglich das oftmals als Dämpfungsmaterial eingesetzte Polystyrol nahm Energie auf und verformte sich wie vorgesehen plastisch. Bei den "Billig-Kindersitzen" ergab sich leider ein komplett anderes Bild. Sobald die Anforderungen über die der Gesetzgebung hinausgehen, ist immer weniger Schutz für die Kinder vorhanden. Besonders im Seitenaufprall offenbarten sich erhebliche Lücken in der Sicherheit. Dies reichte von mechanischem Versagen mancher Plastikteile bis hin zu konstruktiven Unzulänglichkeiten. Vor allem die Gurtführung muss deutlicher gekennzeichnet und mechanisch verstärkt werden. Trotz des hohen Schutzpotenzials einiger Kindersitze ist das Ende der Entwicklung noch nicht abzusehen. In allen Kindersitzklassen ist es prinzipiell möglich, die Belastungswerte weiter zu reduzieren. Dazu werden am Ende des Berichtes verschiedene Möglichkeiten aufgezeigt. Zum einen ist dies eine optimierte Babyschale, die durch eine Trägheitsbewegung gezielt Energie abbaut und das Baby in eine günstigere Position bringt, in der die Belastungen des Körpers reduziert sind. Zum anderen wird gezeigt, dass durch die feste Anbindung des KSS an den Pkw und die Reduzierung der Rotation um die Y-Achse die Belastungen für Kinder reduziert werden können. Größtes Entwicklungspotenzial bietet dabei das ISOFIX-System. Es ist bekannt, dass ISOFIX die Fehlbedienung des Kindersitzes und die Belastungen der Kinder deutlich reduzieren kann. Trotzdem ist die bisherige Marktdurchdringung von ISOFIX eher gering. Obwohl insgesamt ein positives Fazit gezogen werden kann, darf nicht aufgehört werden, die Kindersicherheit weiter zu verbessern. Denn nicht alle Kindersitze schützen heute gleich gut. Einige genügen lediglich den Gesetzesansprüchen und finden in vielen Fällen durch einen sehr geringen Verkaufspreis Zugang in die Pkw. Durch verschärfte Testbedingungen sollten diese Kindersitze abgeschafft und der Weg für neue und bessere Kinderschutzsysteme frei gemacht werden.