91 Fahrzeugkonstruktion
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (109)
- Buch (Monographie) (60)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (5)
- Bericht (5)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (3)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (89)
- Germany (89)
- Conference (79)
- Konferenz (78)
- Safety (53)
- Sicherheit (52)
- Research report (45)
- Forschungsbericht (44)
- Bewertung (39)
- Evaluation (assessment) (38)
Institut
- Sonstige (183) (entfernen)
Der Allgemeine Deutsche Automobil-Club e.V. (ADAC) und die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) veranstalteten am 13. Oktober 2006 in Baden-Baden das 6. Symposium "Sicher fahren in Europa". Die Fachvorträge befassten sich mit den Themenbereichen: Ansätze zu mehr Verkehrssicherheit, - Verbesserung der Fahrzeugsicherheit, - Besondere Zielgruppen. Die CD-ROM dokumentiert die Grußworte, die Referate und die Podiumsdiskussion.
The overall purpose of the ASSESS project is to develop a relevant and standardised set of test and assessment methods and associated tools for integrated vehicle safety systems, primarily focussing on currently available pre-crash sensing systems. The first stage of the project was to define casualty relevant accident scenarios so that the test scenarios will be developed based on accident scenarios which currently result in the greatest injury outcome, measured by a combination of casualty severity and casualty frequency. The first analysis stage was completed using data from a range of accident databases, including those which were nationally representative (STATS19, UK and STRADA, SE) and in-depth sources which provided more detailed parameters to characterise the accident scenarios (GIDAS, DE and OTS, UK). A common analysis method was developed in order to compare the data from these different sources, and while the data sets were not completely compatible, the majority of the data was aligned in such a way that allowed a useful comparison to be made. As the ASSESS project focuses on pre-crash sensing systems fitted to passenger cars, the data selected for the analysis was "injury accidents which involved at least one passenger car". The accident data analysis yielded the following ranked list of most relevant accident scenarios: Rank Accident scenario 1 Driving accident - single vehicle loss of control 2 Accidents in longitudinal traffic (same and opposite directions) 3 Accidents with turning vehicle(s) or crossing paths in junctions 4 Accidents involving pedestrians The ranked list highlights the relatively large role played by "accidents in longitudinal traffic", and "accidents with turning vehicle(s) or crossing paths in junctions" (the second and third most prevalent accident scenarios, respectively). The pre-crash systems addressed in ASSESS propose to yield beneficial safety outcomes with specific regard to these accident scenarios. This indicates that the ASSESS project is highly relevant to the current casualty crash problem. In the second stage of the analysis a selection of these accident scenarios were analysed further to define the accident parameters at a more detailed level .This paper describes the analysis approach and results from the first analysis stage.
This work aims at bringing evidence for mass incompatibility in frontal impact for cars built according to the UNECE R94 regulation. French national injury accidents database census for years 2005 to 2008 were used for the analysis. The heterogeneity of frontal self-protection among cars of different masses is investigated, as well as the partner protection parameter offered by these cars. The last part of the analysis deals with the estimation of the benefit, in terms of fatal and severe injuries avoided, if crashworthiness was harmonized for the whole fleet of vehicle. This calculation is done for France and is extended to all Europe.
Over the past two decades the popularity of consumer crash test programs, commonly referred to as New Car Assessment Programs (NCAP), has grown across the world. They are popular among government regulators as they afford a means of promoting safety innovations and levels of vehicle performance beyond those dictated by national standards. They also fulfill the demand for information regarding the safety ranking of vehicles among consumers contemplating the purchase of a new vehicle. There is no question that consumer crash test programs greatly influence vehicle design changes as well as accelerate the fitment of new safety features. The extent to which these changes can be expected to reduce serious and potentially fatal injuries will be influenced by how well the testing protocols and associated rating schemes correctly reflect the nature of the residual safety problem they seek to address. Drawing on data contained primarily in the US National Automotive Sampling System (NASS), the field relevance of current and proposed testing and rating protocols addressing frontal crash test protection is examined. Emphasis is placed on examining how accurately injury rates computed from the dummy responses measured in consumer crash tests correspond to actual injury rates observed in the field. Additional data from Canadian field investigations and US databases such as the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey (NMVCCS) are examined to see how well frontal airbag firing times, crush pulse durations and other determinants of injury are replicated in consumer testing protocols. This portion of the analysis draws on data obtained from Event Data Recorders (EDR) in both field collisions and staged tests of the same vehicle model. Vehicle rankings and overall frontal crash test ratings were found to be particularly sensitive to the choice of injury risk functions employed in the test. This was particularly true in the case of injury risk functions used to assess neck injury potential. Neck injury risk derived from Nij was found to show the least agreement with the field. Agreement between field chest injury rates and those derived from crash tests was improved considerably when chest injury risk functions for "older" occupants were employed. The paper concludes with a discussion of how different current testing protocols could be improved to enhance their field relevance.
In road traffic accidents, a car-seat and its occupant can be subjected to various crash pulses in the case of a rear impact. This study investigates the influence of crash pulse shape on seat-occupant response and evaluates the corresponding risk of whiplash injury. For this purpose, a rigorously validated seat-occupant system model is used to study different carseat designs and crash pulses. Two different car-seat concepts are also presented which can effectively mitigate whiplash injury for a wide range of crash severity. It is shown that for crash pulses of similar severity, the level of whiplash-risk depends strongly on the combined effects of seat design and crash pulse shape.
An analysis of NASS and FARS was conducted to determine crash conditions that involved injuries that are not currently being directly addressed by vehicle safety standards or by consumer information test protocols. Analysis of both field data and US NCAP tests were conducted to determine the relative safety provided by seating position and by vehicle model year. Opportunities for improvements were determined by crash categories with large populations of injuries that were not addressed by safety tests or smaller numbers that were increasing in frequency. Areas of opportunities include improved occupant restrain in rollovers, improved frontal protection for rear seat occupants and improved fire prevention in frontal and rollover crashes.
The share of high-tensile steel in car bodies has increased over the last years. While occupant safety has generally benefited from this measure, there is a potential risk that, as a result, rescue time may increase considerably. In more than 60% of all car occupant fatalities a technical rescue has been necessary. These are in particular those cases where occupants die immediately at the accident scene. Therefore, in these cases "rescue time" is a very sensitive parameter. In addition to the general analysis of the need of technical rescue and the actual rescue time depending on model years, the injury pattern of occupants requiring technical rescue will be analysed to provide advice for rescue teams. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of rescue measures for the most popular car models depending on the safety cell design is given.
Auf Grundlage von gebräuchlichen und anerkannten Modellen im Kontext der Fahrzeugführung werden zentrale Konzepte identifiziert, die mögliche Ansatzpunkte von langfristigen Wirkungen von Systemen zur Erkennung des Fahrerzustands bilden. Dabei werden nicht nur klassische Mehr-Ebenen-Modelle der Fahraufgabe mit beteiligten Kontrollprozessen berücksichtigt, sondern auch weitere Blickwinkel eingenommen, die in individuellen Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen, Einstellungen oder dem Fahrstil wichtige moderierende Einflussfaktoren identifizieren. Im Rahmen eines allgemeinen Evaluationsansatzes können grundlegende Taxonomien von Bewertungsverfahren, diverse Charakterisierungen von Bewertungsdimensionen sowie wichtige und zu dokumentierende Attribute und Fragestellungen von Evaluationsuntersuchungen beschrieben werden. In diesem Rahmen werden aus den betrachteten Modellen und Konzepten Kriterien abgeleitet, Aspekte der Operationalisierung erörtert sowie methodische Erhebungsansätze vorgeschlagen und diskutiert. Die Bandbreite der betrachteten Methoden ist vielfältig und reicht von unstrukturierten Befragungen über den Einsatz standardisierter Fragebögen bis hin zur maschinellen Erfassung von fahrrelevanten Kenngrößen über fahrzeugeigene Sensorsysteme. Besondere Bedeutung für die Realisierung einer Evaluationsstudie wird möglichst realitätsnahen Erhebungsumständen beigemessen. Daher wird als Rahmenansatz ein Field Operational Test zur Integration der diversen Erhebungsverfahren vorgeschlagen.
Elektronik und IT werden auch im Automobilbereich zunehmend Gegenstand unautorisierter Veränderungen. Diese Studie stellt einen ersten, breiteren Überblick über die praktische Relevanz elektronischer Veränderungen an Fahrzeug- und Infrastruktursystemen dar. Es liefert einen Überblick über wesentliche bekannte und existente Beispiele von Möglichkeiten derartiger Veränderungen, das Risiko ihres Auftretens und damit verbundene Gefahren. Die Ergebnisse basieren auf einer Recherche, die neben wissenschaftlichen Quellen insbesondere das Internet als neues, interaktives Medium einbezieht. Es werden Abschätzungen zur praktischen Relevanz dieser Veränderungen vorgenommen und potentielle Folgen insbesondere für die Verkehrssicherheit reflektiert. Praktische Hinweise auf elektronische Veränderungen sind an 24 Fahrzeug- und Infrastruktursystemen dokumentiert, die als Ziel teils mehrerer Arten von elektronischen Veränderungen identifiziert wurden. Dies erstreckt sich über verschiedene Domänen wie u.a. den Antriebstrang, das Fahrwerk, Infotainment, Fahrerassistenz und mehrere Infrastrukturkomponenten. Diese Systematisierung enthält zudem eine Klassifikation der agierenden Personen, wobei deren individuelle Motivationen, technische Kenntnisse und Ausstattung unterschieden werden. Das Spektrum potentiell resultierender Gefahren wird einerseits theoretisch anhand der erstellten Systematisierungen aufgezeigt und andererseits an 19 Rechercheergebnissen aus verschiedenen Bereichen illustriert. Die so vorgenommene Analyse des Gefährdungspotentials wird ergänzt durch einen Ausblick auf potentielle zukünftige Gefährdungen, die sich insbesondere in kommenden Car-to-Car Kommunikationsnetzen ergeben könnten und die weitere Erforschung von Schutzkonzepten motivieren. Während die recherchierten Veränderungen heute noch meist vom Nutzer ausgehen und das Gefährdungspotential häufig unbeabsichtigt entsteht, könnte zukünftig das vorsätzliche Herbeiführen von Gefährdungen an Bedeutung gewinnen.
The paper presents a methodology for the benefit estimation of several secondary safety systems for pedestrians, using the exceptional data depth of GIDAS. A total of 667 frontal pedestrian accidents up to 40kph and more than 500 AIS2+ injuries have been considered. In addition to the severity, affected body region, exact impact point on the vehicle, and the causing part of every injury, the related Euro NCAP test zone was determined. One results of the study is a detailed impact distribution for AIS2+ injuries across the vehicle front. It can be stated, how often a test zone or vehicle part is hit by pedestrians in frontal accidents and which role the ground impact plays. Basing on that, different secondary safety measures can be evaluated by an injury shift method concerning their real world effectiveness. As an example, measures concerning the Euro NCAP pedestrian rating tests have been evaluated. It was analysed which Euro NCAP test zones are the most effective ones. In addition, real test results have been evaluated. Using the presented methodology, other secondary safety like the active bonnet (pop-up bonnet) or a pedestrian airbag measures can be evaluated.